Can object be omitted in participial construction?
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
"Hyperfocus requires willpower and mental energy to activate, drawing from the limited supply we have to make it through the day."
In this sentence, I think the things that are drawn from the limited supply are willpower and mental energy. But then, is it okay to omit the repetitive object from the sentence?
grammar meaning-in-context
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
"Hyperfocus requires willpower and mental energy to activate, drawing from the limited supply we have to make it through the day."
In this sentence, I think the things that are drawn from the limited supply are willpower and mental energy. But then, is it okay to omit the repetitive object from the sentence?
grammar meaning-in-context
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
"Hyperfocus requires willpower and mental energy to activate, drawing from the limited supply we have to make it through the day."
In this sentence, I think the things that are drawn from the limited supply are willpower and mental energy. But then, is it okay to omit the repetitive object from the sentence?
grammar meaning-in-context
"Hyperfocus requires willpower and mental energy to activate, drawing from the limited supply we have to make it through the day."
In this sentence, I think the things that are drawn from the limited supply are willpower and mental energy. But then, is it okay to omit the repetitive object from the sentence?
grammar meaning-in-context
grammar meaning-in-context
asked Oct 11 at 10:53
Seulgi So
13
13
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
Since you are omitting a plural, it would make more sense to say "...drawing from the limited supplies we have to make it through the day."
I think this would be clear to most native speakers that you are referencing the two objects mentioned previously.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f467848%2fcan-object-be-omitted-in-participial-construction%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
Since you are omitting a plural, it would make more sense to say "...drawing from the limited supplies we have to make it through the day."
I think this would be clear to most native speakers that you are referencing the two objects mentioned previously.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Since you are omitting a plural, it would make more sense to say "...drawing from the limited supplies we have to make it through the day."
I think this would be clear to most native speakers that you are referencing the two objects mentioned previously.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Since you are omitting a plural, it would make more sense to say "...drawing from the limited supplies we have to make it through the day."
I think this would be clear to most native speakers that you are referencing the two objects mentioned previously.
Since you are omitting a plural, it would make more sense to say "...drawing from the limited supplies we have to make it through the day."
I think this would be clear to most native speakers that you are referencing the two objects mentioned previously.
answered Oct 11 at 11:45
Freddie R
77718
77718
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f467848%2fcan-object-be-omitted-in-participial-construction%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown