what is the benefit of having an object of interface itself declare inside the interface for kotlin











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












for example



An interface of



interface StateInterface {

val variationTypes: List<VariationType>
get() = emptyList()

object EMPTY : StateInterface
}


then its been declared inside an actionbean like this



open val stateInterface: StateInterface = StateInterface.EMPTY



Is it all it does it just create a new interface? Why we need to do it this way?










share|improve this question


























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    for example



    An interface of



    interface StateInterface {

    val variationTypes: List<VariationType>
    get() = emptyList()

    object EMPTY : StateInterface
    }


    then its been declared inside an actionbean like this



    open val stateInterface: StateInterface = StateInterface.EMPTY



    Is it all it does it just create a new interface? Why we need to do it this way?










    share|improve this question
























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      for example



      An interface of



      interface StateInterface {

      val variationTypes: List<VariationType>
      get() = emptyList()

      object EMPTY : StateInterface
      }


      then its been declared inside an actionbean like this



      open val stateInterface: StateInterface = StateInterface.EMPTY



      Is it all it does it just create a new interface? Why we need to do it this way?










      share|improve this question













      for example



      An interface of



      interface StateInterface {

      val variationTypes: List<VariationType>
      get() = emptyList()

      object EMPTY : StateInterface
      }


      then its been declared inside an actionbean like this



      open val stateInterface: StateInterface = StateInterface.EMPTY



      Is it all it does it just create a new interface? Why we need to do it this way?







      oop kotlin interface






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 19 at 19:11









      Ezeewei

      2,29532659




      2,29532659
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          3
          down vote



          accepted










          You don't need to do it that way.



          interface StateInterface {

          val variationTypes: List<VariationType>
          get() = emptyList()

          }

          object EMPTY : StateInterface


          Would work fine, but the author decided that they wanted the usage to read StateInterface.EMPTY and not just EMPTY.



          One advantage or reason for choosing this way is that EMPTY appears in the code completion after typing StateInterface. making it easier to find.



          Code Completion



          Another readability advantage is that anyone who references StateInterface.EMPTY does not need an additional import line which they would if it wasn't a nested object.



          import com.example.StateInterface

          val x = StateInterface.EMPTY


          This bit open val stateInterface: StateInterface = StateInterface.EMPTY is a property on an object. It's open so descendant implementations can override it. If they do not, StateInterface.EMPTY will be the value of this property.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 1




            And perhaps a third advantage is that you can have another interface with its own EMPTY member, without a clash of names.
            – gidds
            Nov 19 at 23:48











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53381142%2fwhat-is-the-benefit-of-having-an-object-of-interface-itself-declare-inside-the-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          3
          down vote



          accepted










          You don't need to do it that way.



          interface StateInterface {

          val variationTypes: List<VariationType>
          get() = emptyList()

          }

          object EMPTY : StateInterface


          Would work fine, but the author decided that they wanted the usage to read StateInterface.EMPTY and not just EMPTY.



          One advantage or reason for choosing this way is that EMPTY appears in the code completion after typing StateInterface. making it easier to find.



          Code Completion



          Another readability advantage is that anyone who references StateInterface.EMPTY does not need an additional import line which they would if it wasn't a nested object.



          import com.example.StateInterface

          val x = StateInterface.EMPTY


          This bit open val stateInterface: StateInterface = StateInterface.EMPTY is a property on an object. It's open so descendant implementations can override it. If they do not, StateInterface.EMPTY will be the value of this property.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 1




            And perhaps a third advantage is that you can have another interface with its own EMPTY member, without a clash of names.
            – gidds
            Nov 19 at 23:48















          up vote
          3
          down vote



          accepted










          You don't need to do it that way.



          interface StateInterface {

          val variationTypes: List<VariationType>
          get() = emptyList()

          }

          object EMPTY : StateInterface


          Would work fine, but the author decided that they wanted the usage to read StateInterface.EMPTY and not just EMPTY.



          One advantage or reason for choosing this way is that EMPTY appears in the code completion after typing StateInterface. making it easier to find.



          Code Completion



          Another readability advantage is that anyone who references StateInterface.EMPTY does not need an additional import line which they would if it wasn't a nested object.



          import com.example.StateInterface

          val x = StateInterface.EMPTY


          This bit open val stateInterface: StateInterface = StateInterface.EMPTY is a property on an object. It's open so descendant implementations can override it. If they do not, StateInterface.EMPTY will be the value of this property.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 1




            And perhaps a third advantage is that you can have another interface with its own EMPTY member, without a clash of names.
            – gidds
            Nov 19 at 23:48













          up vote
          3
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          3
          down vote



          accepted






          You don't need to do it that way.



          interface StateInterface {

          val variationTypes: List<VariationType>
          get() = emptyList()

          }

          object EMPTY : StateInterface


          Would work fine, but the author decided that they wanted the usage to read StateInterface.EMPTY and not just EMPTY.



          One advantage or reason for choosing this way is that EMPTY appears in the code completion after typing StateInterface. making it easier to find.



          Code Completion



          Another readability advantage is that anyone who references StateInterface.EMPTY does not need an additional import line which they would if it wasn't a nested object.



          import com.example.StateInterface

          val x = StateInterface.EMPTY


          This bit open val stateInterface: StateInterface = StateInterface.EMPTY is a property on an object. It's open so descendant implementations can override it. If they do not, StateInterface.EMPTY will be the value of this property.






          share|improve this answer














          You don't need to do it that way.



          interface StateInterface {

          val variationTypes: List<VariationType>
          get() = emptyList()

          }

          object EMPTY : StateInterface


          Would work fine, but the author decided that they wanted the usage to read StateInterface.EMPTY and not just EMPTY.



          One advantage or reason for choosing this way is that EMPTY appears in the code completion after typing StateInterface. making it easier to find.



          Code Completion



          Another readability advantage is that anyone who references StateInterface.EMPTY does not need an additional import line which they would if it wasn't a nested object.



          import com.example.StateInterface

          val x = StateInterface.EMPTY


          This bit open val stateInterface: StateInterface = StateInterface.EMPTY is a property on an object. It's open so descendant implementations can override it. If they do not, StateInterface.EMPTY will be the value of this property.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Nov 19 at 19:22

























          answered Nov 19 at 19:17









          weston

          38.9k1695166




          38.9k1695166








          • 1




            And perhaps a third advantage is that you can have another interface with its own EMPTY member, without a clash of names.
            – gidds
            Nov 19 at 23:48














          • 1




            And perhaps a third advantage is that you can have another interface with its own EMPTY member, without a clash of names.
            – gidds
            Nov 19 at 23:48








          1




          1




          And perhaps a third advantage is that you can have another interface with its own EMPTY member, without a clash of names.
          – gidds
          Nov 19 at 23:48




          And perhaps a third advantage is that you can have another interface with its own EMPTY member, without a clash of names.
          – gidds
          Nov 19 at 23:48


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53381142%2fwhat-is-the-benefit-of-having-an-object-of-interface-itself-declare-inside-the-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          "Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

          Alcedinidae

          Origin of the phrase “under your belt”?