WPF Databinding intellisense












9














Ok, so I have a general question about WPF. I've messed a little with ASP.NET MVC and in the markup it has intellisense on your viewmodel object so you don't mistype it( i love it).



Enter WPF, I love it, I'm utilizing the MVVM approach and one annoying thing that I have to do is make sure I'm binding correctly to my viewmodel. So I type something up in my xaml, then I either
1) if I'm lazy just run the app and click around
2) If i'm not lazy
a)Look at the current DataContext of the control I'm working with.
b)Go to that ViewModel class look at the properties
c)Find my property and then click back to my view and make sure that I spelled it correctly.



I believe that you can look at your trace output for incorrect bindings at run time, but is there something in the horizon to allow intellisense in xaml. The View needs to know about my ViewModel, so why not expose that in xaml.



I think it would be nice for the IDE to do that for me, meaning, when I type "{Binding " it should go up the visual tree find the first non-null DataContext and display the properties, let me select one and there you have it.



Am I missing something? Are there any alternatives. Any insight?



EDIT:



Regarding the comments below there is a way to set the datacontext at design time e.g.



<Window.Resources>
<DesignTimeData:DesignTimeCustomers x:Key="designTimeCustomersDS" />
</Window.Resources>


which is a snippet from this blog:
http://karlshifflett.wordpress.com/2008/10/11/viewing-design-time-data-in-visual-studio-2008-cider-designer-in-wpf-and-silverlight-projects/



All it does is reference a class within xaml.



So with that in place could not the designer then utilize reflection on the datacontext to give you all of the properties for that class?










share|improve this question
























  • In some ways WPF really shines - in others it's a POS. This is one of those others.
    – Jonathan C Dickinson
    Jun 3 '09 at 14:13










  • That's why I'm using tests to validate all (well, almost all) view bindings against corresponding ViewModels.
    – Snowbear
    Feb 28 '11 at 11:44










  • As already suggested below, use Resharper (with d:DataContext set), it will save you a lot of time. you can directly generate viewmodel properties from xaml with alt+enter
    – Boklucius
    Aug 1 '13 at 9:52
















9














Ok, so I have a general question about WPF. I've messed a little with ASP.NET MVC and in the markup it has intellisense on your viewmodel object so you don't mistype it( i love it).



Enter WPF, I love it, I'm utilizing the MVVM approach and one annoying thing that I have to do is make sure I'm binding correctly to my viewmodel. So I type something up in my xaml, then I either
1) if I'm lazy just run the app and click around
2) If i'm not lazy
a)Look at the current DataContext of the control I'm working with.
b)Go to that ViewModel class look at the properties
c)Find my property and then click back to my view and make sure that I spelled it correctly.



I believe that you can look at your trace output for incorrect bindings at run time, but is there something in the horizon to allow intellisense in xaml. The View needs to know about my ViewModel, so why not expose that in xaml.



I think it would be nice for the IDE to do that for me, meaning, when I type "{Binding " it should go up the visual tree find the first non-null DataContext and display the properties, let me select one and there you have it.



Am I missing something? Are there any alternatives. Any insight?



EDIT:



Regarding the comments below there is a way to set the datacontext at design time e.g.



<Window.Resources>
<DesignTimeData:DesignTimeCustomers x:Key="designTimeCustomersDS" />
</Window.Resources>


which is a snippet from this blog:
http://karlshifflett.wordpress.com/2008/10/11/viewing-design-time-data-in-visual-studio-2008-cider-designer-in-wpf-and-silverlight-projects/



All it does is reference a class within xaml.



So with that in place could not the designer then utilize reflection on the datacontext to give you all of the properties for that class?










share|improve this question
























  • In some ways WPF really shines - in others it's a POS. This is one of those others.
    – Jonathan C Dickinson
    Jun 3 '09 at 14:13










  • That's why I'm using tests to validate all (well, almost all) view bindings against corresponding ViewModels.
    – Snowbear
    Feb 28 '11 at 11:44










  • As already suggested below, use Resharper (with d:DataContext set), it will save you a lot of time. you can directly generate viewmodel properties from xaml with alt+enter
    – Boklucius
    Aug 1 '13 at 9:52














9












9








9


2





Ok, so I have a general question about WPF. I've messed a little with ASP.NET MVC and in the markup it has intellisense on your viewmodel object so you don't mistype it( i love it).



Enter WPF, I love it, I'm utilizing the MVVM approach and one annoying thing that I have to do is make sure I'm binding correctly to my viewmodel. So I type something up in my xaml, then I either
1) if I'm lazy just run the app and click around
2) If i'm not lazy
a)Look at the current DataContext of the control I'm working with.
b)Go to that ViewModel class look at the properties
c)Find my property and then click back to my view and make sure that I spelled it correctly.



I believe that you can look at your trace output for incorrect bindings at run time, but is there something in the horizon to allow intellisense in xaml. The View needs to know about my ViewModel, so why not expose that in xaml.



I think it would be nice for the IDE to do that for me, meaning, when I type "{Binding " it should go up the visual tree find the first non-null DataContext and display the properties, let me select one and there you have it.



Am I missing something? Are there any alternatives. Any insight?



EDIT:



Regarding the comments below there is a way to set the datacontext at design time e.g.



<Window.Resources>
<DesignTimeData:DesignTimeCustomers x:Key="designTimeCustomersDS" />
</Window.Resources>


which is a snippet from this blog:
http://karlshifflett.wordpress.com/2008/10/11/viewing-design-time-data-in-visual-studio-2008-cider-designer-in-wpf-and-silverlight-projects/



All it does is reference a class within xaml.



So with that in place could not the designer then utilize reflection on the datacontext to give you all of the properties for that class?










share|improve this question















Ok, so I have a general question about WPF. I've messed a little with ASP.NET MVC and in the markup it has intellisense on your viewmodel object so you don't mistype it( i love it).



Enter WPF, I love it, I'm utilizing the MVVM approach and one annoying thing that I have to do is make sure I'm binding correctly to my viewmodel. So I type something up in my xaml, then I either
1) if I'm lazy just run the app and click around
2) If i'm not lazy
a)Look at the current DataContext of the control I'm working with.
b)Go to that ViewModel class look at the properties
c)Find my property and then click back to my view and make sure that I spelled it correctly.



I believe that you can look at your trace output for incorrect bindings at run time, but is there something in the horizon to allow intellisense in xaml. The View needs to know about my ViewModel, so why not expose that in xaml.



I think it would be nice for the IDE to do that for me, meaning, when I type "{Binding " it should go up the visual tree find the first non-null DataContext and display the properties, let me select one and there you have it.



Am I missing something? Are there any alternatives. Any insight?



EDIT:



Regarding the comments below there is a way to set the datacontext at design time e.g.



<Window.Resources>
<DesignTimeData:DesignTimeCustomers x:Key="designTimeCustomersDS" />
</Window.Resources>


which is a snippet from this blog:
http://karlshifflett.wordpress.com/2008/10/11/viewing-design-time-data-in-visual-studio-2008-cider-designer-in-wpf-and-silverlight-projects/



All it does is reference a class within xaml.



So with that in place could not the designer then utilize reflection on the datacontext to give you all of the properties for that class?







wpf data-binding mvvm intellisense






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Aug 1 '11 at 16:19









Dave Clemmer

2,977114371




2,977114371










asked Jun 3 '09 at 14:10









Jose

6,009185482




6,009185482












  • In some ways WPF really shines - in others it's a POS. This is one of those others.
    – Jonathan C Dickinson
    Jun 3 '09 at 14:13










  • That's why I'm using tests to validate all (well, almost all) view bindings against corresponding ViewModels.
    – Snowbear
    Feb 28 '11 at 11:44










  • As already suggested below, use Resharper (with d:DataContext set), it will save you a lot of time. you can directly generate viewmodel properties from xaml with alt+enter
    – Boklucius
    Aug 1 '13 at 9:52


















  • In some ways WPF really shines - in others it's a POS. This is one of those others.
    – Jonathan C Dickinson
    Jun 3 '09 at 14:13










  • That's why I'm using tests to validate all (well, almost all) view bindings against corresponding ViewModels.
    – Snowbear
    Feb 28 '11 at 11:44










  • As already suggested below, use Resharper (with d:DataContext set), it will save you a lot of time. you can directly generate viewmodel properties from xaml with alt+enter
    – Boklucius
    Aug 1 '13 at 9:52
















In some ways WPF really shines - in others it's a POS. This is one of those others.
– Jonathan C Dickinson
Jun 3 '09 at 14:13




In some ways WPF really shines - in others it's a POS. This is one of those others.
– Jonathan C Dickinson
Jun 3 '09 at 14:13












That's why I'm using tests to validate all (well, almost all) view bindings against corresponding ViewModels.
– Snowbear
Feb 28 '11 at 11:44




That's why I'm using tests to validate all (well, almost all) view bindings against corresponding ViewModels.
– Snowbear
Feb 28 '11 at 11:44












As already suggested below, use Resharper (with d:DataContext set), it will save you a lot of time. you can directly generate viewmodel properties from xaml with alt+enter
– Boklucius
Aug 1 '13 at 9:52




As already suggested below, use Resharper (with d:DataContext set), it will save you a lot of time. you can directly generate viewmodel properties from xaml with alt+enter
– Boklucius
Aug 1 '13 at 9:52












5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















5















So with that in place could not the
designer then utilize reflection on
the datacontext to give you all of the
properties for that class?




Resharper 6 has this feature and can show you members of the d:DataContext in the intellisense, if you set the d:DataContext on the View.






share|improve this answer





























    6














    VS 2013:



    IntelliSense with resolved DataContext
    enter image description here



    IntelliSense with design time DataContext
    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer





















    • Nice, this fixed it for me using VS2017. Had to add a reference to the namespace in my Window: xmlns:vm="clr-namespace:my.viewmodel.namespace" and then set the design time viewmodel on the Window: d:DataContext="{d:DesignInstance Type=vm:MyViewModel}". I now have intellisense on my bindings even though the DataContext is initialised in external code.
      – Richard Moore
      Oct 29 at 19:49



















    4














    Visual Studio 2010 will support intellisense on Bindings. However, this is limited to the properties of the Binding object itself. For example after typing "{Binding " into the XAML editor I then get intellisense on the remaining properties (Path, ElementName, etc.).



    I don't think the type of intellisense regarding the data context you specified would be possible as the data context is set at run-time. I've tried experimenting in VS 2010 by setting the data context directly in the constructor but did not have any luck.






    share|improve this answer





















    • Here's the link for the MIX09 video that goes over some of this, fast forward to around 20min to get into the Resource Picker and intellisence: videos.visitmix.com/MIX09/T73M
      – rmoore
      Jun 3 '09 at 15:48










    • Given that the DataContext is set a run time, I doubt that it's possible to implement intellisense for bindings, unfortunately. Just because the type of the variable set as the DataContext is Foo, it could really be a Bar and Bar's properties are fair game to use for bindings. How could Visual Studio know this to be the case?
      – Andy
      Jun 3 '09 at 17:29










    • I made some updates above that basically indicates that we can assign the datacontext in design time. But from your comments, it seems this isn't on the horizon.
      – Jose
      Jun 4 '09 at 16:22



















    2














    According to :



    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudio/archive/2013/08/09/xaml-editor-improvements-in-visual-studio-2013.aspx



    Visual studio 2013 xaml Editor now is supporting IntelliSense for Data Binding






    share|improve this answer





























      1














      In Visual Studio 2010 there is a binding builder which you can enable
      http://blogs.msdn.com/b/wpfsldesigner/archive/2010/06/14/how-to-enable-using-the-binding-builder-in-wpf-and-silverlight-applications.aspx
      but you still don't get intellisense which is weird.






      share|improve this answer























        Your Answer






        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
        StackExchange.snippets.init();
        });
        });
        }, "code-snippets");

        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "1"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f944987%2fwpf-databinding-intellisense%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        5 Answers
        5






        active

        oldest

        votes








        5 Answers
        5






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        5















        So with that in place could not the
        designer then utilize reflection on
        the datacontext to give you all of the
        properties for that class?




        Resharper 6 has this feature and can show you members of the d:DataContext in the intellisense, if you set the d:DataContext on the View.






        share|improve this answer


























          5















          So with that in place could not the
          designer then utilize reflection on
          the datacontext to give you all of the
          properties for that class?




          Resharper 6 has this feature and can show you members of the d:DataContext in the intellisense, if you set the d:DataContext on the View.






          share|improve this answer
























            5












            5








            5







            So with that in place could not the
            designer then utilize reflection on
            the datacontext to give you all of the
            properties for that class?




            Resharper 6 has this feature and can show you members of the d:DataContext in the intellisense, if you set the d:DataContext on the View.






            share|improve this answer













            So with that in place could not the
            designer then utilize reflection on
            the datacontext to give you all of the
            properties for that class?




            Resharper 6 has this feature and can show you members of the d:DataContext in the intellisense, if you set the d:DataContext on the View.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Jun 17 '11 at 8:54









            Liviu Trifoi

            2,36611527




            2,36611527

























                6














                VS 2013:



                IntelliSense with resolved DataContext
                enter image description here



                IntelliSense with design time DataContext
                enter image description here






                share|improve this answer





















                • Nice, this fixed it for me using VS2017. Had to add a reference to the namespace in my Window: xmlns:vm="clr-namespace:my.viewmodel.namespace" and then set the design time viewmodel on the Window: d:DataContext="{d:DesignInstance Type=vm:MyViewModel}". I now have intellisense on my bindings even though the DataContext is initialised in external code.
                  – Richard Moore
                  Oct 29 at 19:49
















                6














                VS 2013:



                IntelliSense with resolved DataContext
                enter image description here



                IntelliSense with design time DataContext
                enter image description here






                share|improve this answer





















                • Nice, this fixed it for me using VS2017. Had to add a reference to the namespace in my Window: xmlns:vm="clr-namespace:my.viewmodel.namespace" and then set the design time viewmodel on the Window: d:DataContext="{d:DesignInstance Type=vm:MyViewModel}". I now have intellisense on my bindings even though the DataContext is initialised in external code.
                  – Richard Moore
                  Oct 29 at 19:49














                6












                6








                6






                VS 2013:



                IntelliSense with resolved DataContext
                enter image description here



                IntelliSense with design time DataContext
                enter image description here






                share|improve this answer












                VS 2013:



                IntelliSense with resolved DataContext
                enter image description here



                IntelliSense with design time DataContext
                enter image description here







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Feb 15 '15 at 15:50









                RAM

                7,61243658




                7,61243658












                • Nice, this fixed it for me using VS2017. Had to add a reference to the namespace in my Window: xmlns:vm="clr-namespace:my.viewmodel.namespace" and then set the design time viewmodel on the Window: d:DataContext="{d:DesignInstance Type=vm:MyViewModel}". I now have intellisense on my bindings even though the DataContext is initialised in external code.
                  – Richard Moore
                  Oct 29 at 19:49


















                • Nice, this fixed it for me using VS2017. Had to add a reference to the namespace in my Window: xmlns:vm="clr-namespace:my.viewmodel.namespace" and then set the design time viewmodel on the Window: d:DataContext="{d:DesignInstance Type=vm:MyViewModel}". I now have intellisense on my bindings even though the DataContext is initialised in external code.
                  – Richard Moore
                  Oct 29 at 19:49
















                Nice, this fixed it for me using VS2017. Had to add a reference to the namespace in my Window: xmlns:vm="clr-namespace:my.viewmodel.namespace" and then set the design time viewmodel on the Window: d:DataContext="{d:DesignInstance Type=vm:MyViewModel}". I now have intellisense on my bindings even though the DataContext is initialised in external code.
                – Richard Moore
                Oct 29 at 19:49




                Nice, this fixed it for me using VS2017. Had to add a reference to the namespace in my Window: xmlns:vm="clr-namespace:my.viewmodel.namespace" and then set the design time viewmodel on the Window: d:DataContext="{d:DesignInstance Type=vm:MyViewModel}". I now have intellisense on my bindings even though the DataContext is initialised in external code.
                – Richard Moore
                Oct 29 at 19:49











                4














                Visual Studio 2010 will support intellisense on Bindings. However, this is limited to the properties of the Binding object itself. For example after typing "{Binding " into the XAML editor I then get intellisense on the remaining properties (Path, ElementName, etc.).



                I don't think the type of intellisense regarding the data context you specified would be possible as the data context is set at run-time. I've tried experimenting in VS 2010 by setting the data context directly in the constructor but did not have any luck.






                share|improve this answer





















                • Here's the link for the MIX09 video that goes over some of this, fast forward to around 20min to get into the Resource Picker and intellisence: videos.visitmix.com/MIX09/T73M
                  – rmoore
                  Jun 3 '09 at 15:48










                • Given that the DataContext is set a run time, I doubt that it's possible to implement intellisense for bindings, unfortunately. Just because the type of the variable set as the DataContext is Foo, it could really be a Bar and Bar's properties are fair game to use for bindings. How could Visual Studio know this to be the case?
                  – Andy
                  Jun 3 '09 at 17:29










                • I made some updates above that basically indicates that we can assign the datacontext in design time. But from your comments, it seems this isn't on the horizon.
                  – Jose
                  Jun 4 '09 at 16:22
















                4














                Visual Studio 2010 will support intellisense on Bindings. However, this is limited to the properties of the Binding object itself. For example after typing "{Binding " into the XAML editor I then get intellisense on the remaining properties (Path, ElementName, etc.).



                I don't think the type of intellisense regarding the data context you specified would be possible as the data context is set at run-time. I've tried experimenting in VS 2010 by setting the data context directly in the constructor but did not have any luck.






                share|improve this answer





















                • Here's the link for the MIX09 video that goes over some of this, fast forward to around 20min to get into the Resource Picker and intellisence: videos.visitmix.com/MIX09/T73M
                  – rmoore
                  Jun 3 '09 at 15:48










                • Given that the DataContext is set a run time, I doubt that it's possible to implement intellisense for bindings, unfortunately. Just because the type of the variable set as the DataContext is Foo, it could really be a Bar and Bar's properties are fair game to use for bindings. How could Visual Studio know this to be the case?
                  – Andy
                  Jun 3 '09 at 17:29










                • I made some updates above that basically indicates that we can assign the datacontext in design time. But from your comments, it seems this isn't on the horizon.
                  – Jose
                  Jun 4 '09 at 16:22














                4












                4








                4






                Visual Studio 2010 will support intellisense on Bindings. However, this is limited to the properties of the Binding object itself. For example after typing "{Binding " into the XAML editor I then get intellisense on the remaining properties (Path, ElementName, etc.).



                I don't think the type of intellisense regarding the data context you specified would be possible as the data context is set at run-time. I've tried experimenting in VS 2010 by setting the data context directly in the constructor but did not have any luck.






                share|improve this answer












                Visual Studio 2010 will support intellisense on Bindings. However, this is limited to the properties of the Binding object itself. For example after typing "{Binding " into the XAML editor I then get intellisense on the remaining properties (Path, ElementName, etc.).



                I don't think the type of intellisense regarding the data context you specified would be possible as the data context is set at run-time. I've tried experimenting in VS 2010 by setting the data context directly in the constructor but did not have any luck.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Jun 3 '09 at 15:46









                Richard McGuire

                7,18482633




                7,18482633












                • Here's the link for the MIX09 video that goes over some of this, fast forward to around 20min to get into the Resource Picker and intellisence: videos.visitmix.com/MIX09/T73M
                  – rmoore
                  Jun 3 '09 at 15:48










                • Given that the DataContext is set a run time, I doubt that it's possible to implement intellisense for bindings, unfortunately. Just because the type of the variable set as the DataContext is Foo, it could really be a Bar and Bar's properties are fair game to use for bindings. How could Visual Studio know this to be the case?
                  – Andy
                  Jun 3 '09 at 17:29










                • I made some updates above that basically indicates that we can assign the datacontext in design time. But from your comments, it seems this isn't on the horizon.
                  – Jose
                  Jun 4 '09 at 16:22


















                • Here's the link for the MIX09 video that goes over some of this, fast forward to around 20min to get into the Resource Picker and intellisence: videos.visitmix.com/MIX09/T73M
                  – rmoore
                  Jun 3 '09 at 15:48










                • Given that the DataContext is set a run time, I doubt that it's possible to implement intellisense for bindings, unfortunately. Just because the type of the variable set as the DataContext is Foo, it could really be a Bar and Bar's properties are fair game to use for bindings. How could Visual Studio know this to be the case?
                  – Andy
                  Jun 3 '09 at 17:29










                • I made some updates above that basically indicates that we can assign the datacontext in design time. But from your comments, it seems this isn't on the horizon.
                  – Jose
                  Jun 4 '09 at 16:22
















                Here's the link for the MIX09 video that goes over some of this, fast forward to around 20min to get into the Resource Picker and intellisence: videos.visitmix.com/MIX09/T73M
                – rmoore
                Jun 3 '09 at 15:48




                Here's the link for the MIX09 video that goes over some of this, fast forward to around 20min to get into the Resource Picker and intellisence: videos.visitmix.com/MIX09/T73M
                – rmoore
                Jun 3 '09 at 15:48












                Given that the DataContext is set a run time, I doubt that it's possible to implement intellisense for bindings, unfortunately. Just because the type of the variable set as the DataContext is Foo, it could really be a Bar and Bar's properties are fair game to use for bindings. How could Visual Studio know this to be the case?
                – Andy
                Jun 3 '09 at 17:29




                Given that the DataContext is set a run time, I doubt that it's possible to implement intellisense for bindings, unfortunately. Just because the type of the variable set as the DataContext is Foo, it could really be a Bar and Bar's properties are fair game to use for bindings. How could Visual Studio know this to be the case?
                – Andy
                Jun 3 '09 at 17:29












                I made some updates above that basically indicates that we can assign the datacontext in design time. But from your comments, it seems this isn't on the horizon.
                – Jose
                Jun 4 '09 at 16:22




                I made some updates above that basically indicates that we can assign the datacontext in design time. But from your comments, it seems this isn't on the horizon.
                – Jose
                Jun 4 '09 at 16:22











                2














                According to :



                http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudio/archive/2013/08/09/xaml-editor-improvements-in-visual-studio-2013.aspx



                Visual studio 2013 xaml Editor now is supporting IntelliSense for Data Binding






                share|improve this answer


























                  2














                  According to :



                  http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudio/archive/2013/08/09/xaml-editor-improvements-in-visual-studio-2013.aspx



                  Visual studio 2013 xaml Editor now is supporting IntelliSense for Data Binding






                  share|improve this answer
























                    2












                    2








                    2






                    According to :



                    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudio/archive/2013/08/09/xaml-editor-improvements-in-visual-studio-2013.aspx



                    Visual studio 2013 xaml Editor now is supporting IntelliSense for Data Binding






                    share|improve this answer












                    According to :



                    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudio/archive/2013/08/09/xaml-editor-improvements-in-visual-studio-2013.aspx



                    Visual studio 2013 xaml Editor now is supporting IntelliSense for Data Binding







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered Jun 3 '14 at 14:09









                    M.Sabaa

                    1137




                    1137























                        1














                        In Visual Studio 2010 there is a binding builder which you can enable
                        http://blogs.msdn.com/b/wpfsldesigner/archive/2010/06/14/how-to-enable-using-the-binding-builder-in-wpf-and-silverlight-applications.aspx
                        but you still don't get intellisense which is weird.






                        share|improve this answer




























                          1














                          In Visual Studio 2010 there is a binding builder which you can enable
                          http://blogs.msdn.com/b/wpfsldesigner/archive/2010/06/14/how-to-enable-using-the-binding-builder-in-wpf-and-silverlight-applications.aspx
                          but you still don't get intellisense which is weird.






                          share|improve this answer


























                            1












                            1








                            1






                            In Visual Studio 2010 there is a binding builder which you can enable
                            http://blogs.msdn.com/b/wpfsldesigner/archive/2010/06/14/how-to-enable-using-the-binding-builder-in-wpf-and-silverlight-applications.aspx
                            but you still don't get intellisense which is weird.






                            share|improve this answer














                            In Visual Studio 2010 there is a binding builder which you can enable
                            http://blogs.msdn.com/b/wpfsldesigner/archive/2010/06/14/how-to-enable-using-the-binding-builder-in-wpf-and-silverlight-applications.aspx
                            but you still don't get intellisense which is weird.







                            share|improve this answer














                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer








                            edited Jul 8 '11 at 2:51

























                            answered Feb 28 '11 at 11:41









                            Jeremy Thomas

                            14914




                            14914






























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded




















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                                Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                                Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f944987%2fwpf-databinding-intellisense%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

                                Alcedinidae

                                Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]