A question on dominant morphism of affine schemes
Let $A subseteq B$ be a ring extension where $A,B$ are both finitely generated $mathbb C$-domain of the same Krull dimension. Also assume $A$ is regular (i.e. $A_{ mathfrak p}$ is regular local ring for every prime ideal $mathfrak p$ of $A$ ).
If $P$ is a prime ideal of $A$ with finitely many prime ideals of $B$ lying over it , then does there exist $f in A setminus P$ such that every prime ideal of $A_f$ has finitely many prime ideals of $B$ lying over it ?
ag.algebraic-geometry ac.commutative-algebra dimension-theory
|
show 1 more comment
Let $A subseteq B$ be a ring extension where $A,B$ are both finitely generated $mathbb C$-domain of the same Krull dimension. Also assume $A$ is regular (i.e. $A_{ mathfrak p}$ is regular local ring for every prime ideal $mathfrak p$ of $A$ ).
If $P$ is a prime ideal of $A$ with finitely many prime ideals of $B$ lying over it , then does there exist $f in A setminus P$ such that every prime ideal of $A_f$ has finitely many prime ideals of $B$ lying over it ?
ag.algebraic-geometry ac.commutative-algebra dimension-theory
I am not able to understand where is the dominant morphism of Affine schemes...
– Praphulla Koushik
Jan 1 at 6:23
@PraphullaKoushik: just the inclusion $A to B$ ...
– user521337
Jan 1 at 6:25
Do you think title can be edited to make it clearer or it is difficult to say this in one line.. I am not questioning anything I am simply asking.. Can you tell how does algebraic geometry tag is relevant here?
– Praphulla Koushik
Jan 1 at 6:26
@PraphullaKoushik: In algebraic geometric terms ... let $X,Y$ be integral, finite type, affine $mathbb C$-schemes with $dim X=dim Y$ with $Y$ non-singular, normal. Let $f: X to Y$ be a dominant morphism. Let $U:={yin Y : f^{-1}({y}) $ is finite and non-empty $}$ . Question: Is $U$ open ?
– user521337
Jan 1 at 6:32
2
This is a duplicate from [mathoverflow.net/questions/193/…
– Matthieu Romagny
2 days ago
|
show 1 more comment
Let $A subseteq B$ be a ring extension where $A,B$ are both finitely generated $mathbb C$-domain of the same Krull dimension. Also assume $A$ is regular (i.e. $A_{ mathfrak p}$ is regular local ring for every prime ideal $mathfrak p$ of $A$ ).
If $P$ is a prime ideal of $A$ with finitely many prime ideals of $B$ lying over it , then does there exist $f in A setminus P$ such that every prime ideal of $A_f$ has finitely many prime ideals of $B$ lying over it ?
ag.algebraic-geometry ac.commutative-algebra dimension-theory
Let $A subseteq B$ be a ring extension where $A,B$ are both finitely generated $mathbb C$-domain of the same Krull dimension. Also assume $A$ is regular (i.e. $A_{ mathfrak p}$ is regular local ring for every prime ideal $mathfrak p$ of $A$ ).
If $P$ is a prime ideal of $A$ with finitely many prime ideals of $B$ lying over it , then does there exist $f in A setminus P$ such that every prime ideal of $A_f$ has finitely many prime ideals of $B$ lying over it ?
ag.algebraic-geometry ac.commutative-algebra dimension-theory
ag.algebraic-geometry ac.commutative-algebra dimension-theory
asked Jan 1 at 5:41
user521337
56115
56115
I am not able to understand where is the dominant morphism of Affine schemes...
– Praphulla Koushik
Jan 1 at 6:23
@PraphullaKoushik: just the inclusion $A to B$ ...
– user521337
Jan 1 at 6:25
Do you think title can be edited to make it clearer or it is difficult to say this in one line.. I am not questioning anything I am simply asking.. Can you tell how does algebraic geometry tag is relevant here?
– Praphulla Koushik
Jan 1 at 6:26
@PraphullaKoushik: In algebraic geometric terms ... let $X,Y$ be integral, finite type, affine $mathbb C$-schemes with $dim X=dim Y$ with $Y$ non-singular, normal. Let $f: X to Y$ be a dominant morphism. Let $U:={yin Y : f^{-1}({y}) $ is finite and non-empty $}$ . Question: Is $U$ open ?
– user521337
Jan 1 at 6:32
2
This is a duplicate from [mathoverflow.net/questions/193/…
– Matthieu Romagny
2 days ago
|
show 1 more comment
I am not able to understand where is the dominant morphism of Affine schemes...
– Praphulla Koushik
Jan 1 at 6:23
@PraphullaKoushik: just the inclusion $A to B$ ...
– user521337
Jan 1 at 6:25
Do you think title can be edited to make it clearer or it is difficult to say this in one line.. I am not questioning anything I am simply asking.. Can you tell how does algebraic geometry tag is relevant here?
– Praphulla Koushik
Jan 1 at 6:26
@PraphullaKoushik: In algebraic geometric terms ... let $X,Y$ be integral, finite type, affine $mathbb C$-schemes with $dim X=dim Y$ with $Y$ non-singular, normal. Let $f: X to Y$ be a dominant morphism. Let $U:={yin Y : f^{-1}({y}) $ is finite and non-empty $}$ . Question: Is $U$ open ?
– user521337
Jan 1 at 6:32
2
This is a duplicate from [mathoverflow.net/questions/193/…
– Matthieu Romagny
2 days ago
I am not able to understand where is the dominant morphism of Affine schemes...
– Praphulla Koushik
Jan 1 at 6:23
I am not able to understand where is the dominant morphism of Affine schemes...
– Praphulla Koushik
Jan 1 at 6:23
@PraphullaKoushik: just the inclusion $A to B$ ...
– user521337
Jan 1 at 6:25
@PraphullaKoushik: just the inclusion $A to B$ ...
– user521337
Jan 1 at 6:25
Do you think title can be edited to make it clearer or it is difficult to say this in one line.. I am not questioning anything I am simply asking.. Can you tell how does algebraic geometry tag is relevant here?
– Praphulla Koushik
Jan 1 at 6:26
Do you think title can be edited to make it clearer or it is difficult to say this in one line.. I am not questioning anything I am simply asking.. Can you tell how does algebraic geometry tag is relevant here?
– Praphulla Koushik
Jan 1 at 6:26
@PraphullaKoushik: In algebraic geometric terms ... let $X,Y$ be integral, finite type, affine $mathbb C$-schemes with $dim X=dim Y$ with $Y$ non-singular, normal. Let $f: X to Y$ be a dominant morphism. Let $U:={yin Y : f^{-1}({y}) $ is finite and non-empty $}$ . Question: Is $U$ open ?
– user521337
Jan 1 at 6:32
@PraphullaKoushik: In algebraic geometric terms ... let $X,Y$ be integral, finite type, affine $mathbb C$-schemes with $dim X=dim Y$ with $Y$ non-singular, normal. Let $f: X to Y$ be a dominant morphism. Let $U:={yin Y : f^{-1}({y}) $ is finite and non-empty $}$ . Question: Is $U$ open ?
– user521337
Jan 1 at 6:32
2
2
This is a duplicate from [mathoverflow.net/questions/193/…
– Matthieu Romagny
2 days ago
This is a duplicate from [mathoverflow.net/questions/193/…
– Matthieu Romagny
2 days ago
|
show 1 more comment
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The comment of @MatthieuRomagny gives a link to some positive answers under additional hypotheses. Nonetheless, the answer is negative without further hypotheses. Before stating the negative counterexamples, let me state the positive result (that I suspect motivated this question).
Zariski's Main Theorem (Original Form). A birational (separated, finite type) morphism to a normal (finite type) $k$-scheme restricts as an open immersion on the maximal open of the domain where the morphism is quasi-finite.
One excellent reference for Zariski's Main Theorem is Section III.9 of the following (the formulation above is on p. 288).
MR0971985 (89k:14001)
Mumford, David
The red book of varieties and schemes.
Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1358.
Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1988.
Corollary of ZMT. For a birational (separated, finite type) morphism to a normal (finite type) $k$-scheme, for every point of the target where the fiber is nonempty and finite, there exists an open neighborhood of the point over which the morphism is an isomorphism.
Counterexamples. Nonetheless, if you remove the hypothesis that the morphism is birational, there are counterexamples. Here is one.
Let $k$ be a field, and let $A$ be the polynomial ring $k[s,t,u]$. Let $B$ be the ring $k[x,y,z,w]/langle zw-1 rangle$. Both of these are finitely generated $k$-algebras that are regular, in fact $k$-smooth. Now consider the $k$-algebra homomorphism, $$p:Ato B, p(s) = x(1-x), p(t) = xy, p(u) = z(1-xz).$$ If we invert the element $s$ in $A$ and the image element $x(1-x)$ in $B$, then the induced ring homomorphism is finite and flat of rank $4$. In particular, the localized ring homomorphism is injective. Since the natural map from $A$ to $A[1/s]$ is injective, also $p$ is injective.
Finally, consider the prime ideal $P=langle s,t,urangle$ in $A$. There is precisely one prime lying above this prime, namely $langle x-1,y,z-1,w-1rangle$. However, the prime ideal $Q=langle s,t rangle$ has infinitely many primes lying over it, e.g., $langle x,q(y) rangle$ where $q(y)in k[y]$ is an arbitrary nonzero, noninvertible element that is irreducible. Since $Q$ is contained in $P$, for every $fin Asetminus P$, also $f$ is in $Asetminus Q$. Thus, the ideal $QA_f$ is a prime ideal of $A_f$. So the induced ring homomorphism $A_f to B_{p(f)}$ still admits a prime ideal $QA_f$ that has infinitely many primes lying over it in $B_{p(f)}$.
There are also counterexamples to the corollary if we allow that the fiber is empty (but the morphism is still birational). Namely, consider the self-map, $$r:Ato A, r(s) = s, r(t) = st, r(u) = 1-su.$$ This ring homomorphism is birational. The fiber over $langle s,t,urangle$ is empty. Yet the fiber over $langle s,t rangle$ is infinite, as above.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "504"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f319855%2fa-question-on-dominant-morphism-of-affine-schemes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The comment of @MatthieuRomagny gives a link to some positive answers under additional hypotheses. Nonetheless, the answer is negative without further hypotheses. Before stating the negative counterexamples, let me state the positive result (that I suspect motivated this question).
Zariski's Main Theorem (Original Form). A birational (separated, finite type) morphism to a normal (finite type) $k$-scheme restricts as an open immersion on the maximal open of the domain where the morphism is quasi-finite.
One excellent reference for Zariski's Main Theorem is Section III.9 of the following (the formulation above is on p. 288).
MR0971985 (89k:14001)
Mumford, David
The red book of varieties and schemes.
Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1358.
Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1988.
Corollary of ZMT. For a birational (separated, finite type) morphism to a normal (finite type) $k$-scheme, for every point of the target where the fiber is nonempty and finite, there exists an open neighborhood of the point over which the morphism is an isomorphism.
Counterexamples. Nonetheless, if you remove the hypothesis that the morphism is birational, there are counterexamples. Here is one.
Let $k$ be a field, and let $A$ be the polynomial ring $k[s,t,u]$. Let $B$ be the ring $k[x,y,z,w]/langle zw-1 rangle$. Both of these are finitely generated $k$-algebras that are regular, in fact $k$-smooth. Now consider the $k$-algebra homomorphism, $$p:Ato B, p(s) = x(1-x), p(t) = xy, p(u) = z(1-xz).$$ If we invert the element $s$ in $A$ and the image element $x(1-x)$ in $B$, then the induced ring homomorphism is finite and flat of rank $4$. In particular, the localized ring homomorphism is injective. Since the natural map from $A$ to $A[1/s]$ is injective, also $p$ is injective.
Finally, consider the prime ideal $P=langle s,t,urangle$ in $A$. There is precisely one prime lying above this prime, namely $langle x-1,y,z-1,w-1rangle$. However, the prime ideal $Q=langle s,t rangle$ has infinitely many primes lying over it, e.g., $langle x,q(y) rangle$ where $q(y)in k[y]$ is an arbitrary nonzero, noninvertible element that is irreducible. Since $Q$ is contained in $P$, for every $fin Asetminus P$, also $f$ is in $Asetminus Q$. Thus, the ideal $QA_f$ is a prime ideal of $A_f$. So the induced ring homomorphism $A_f to B_{p(f)}$ still admits a prime ideal $QA_f$ that has infinitely many primes lying over it in $B_{p(f)}$.
There are also counterexamples to the corollary if we allow that the fiber is empty (but the morphism is still birational). Namely, consider the self-map, $$r:Ato A, r(s) = s, r(t) = st, r(u) = 1-su.$$ This ring homomorphism is birational. The fiber over $langle s,t,urangle$ is empty. Yet the fiber over $langle s,t rangle$ is infinite, as above.
add a comment |
The comment of @MatthieuRomagny gives a link to some positive answers under additional hypotheses. Nonetheless, the answer is negative without further hypotheses. Before stating the negative counterexamples, let me state the positive result (that I suspect motivated this question).
Zariski's Main Theorem (Original Form). A birational (separated, finite type) morphism to a normal (finite type) $k$-scheme restricts as an open immersion on the maximal open of the domain where the morphism is quasi-finite.
One excellent reference for Zariski's Main Theorem is Section III.9 of the following (the formulation above is on p. 288).
MR0971985 (89k:14001)
Mumford, David
The red book of varieties and schemes.
Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1358.
Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1988.
Corollary of ZMT. For a birational (separated, finite type) morphism to a normal (finite type) $k$-scheme, for every point of the target where the fiber is nonempty and finite, there exists an open neighborhood of the point over which the morphism is an isomorphism.
Counterexamples. Nonetheless, if you remove the hypothesis that the morphism is birational, there are counterexamples. Here is one.
Let $k$ be a field, and let $A$ be the polynomial ring $k[s,t,u]$. Let $B$ be the ring $k[x,y,z,w]/langle zw-1 rangle$. Both of these are finitely generated $k$-algebras that are regular, in fact $k$-smooth. Now consider the $k$-algebra homomorphism, $$p:Ato B, p(s) = x(1-x), p(t) = xy, p(u) = z(1-xz).$$ If we invert the element $s$ in $A$ and the image element $x(1-x)$ in $B$, then the induced ring homomorphism is finite and flat of rank $4$. In particular, the localized ring homomorphism is injective. Since the natural map from $A$ to $A[1/s]$ is injective, also $p$ is injective.
Finally, consider the prime ideal $P=langle s,t,urangle$ in $A$. There is precisely one prime lying above this prime, namely $langle x-1,y,z-1,w-1rangle$. However, the prime ideal $Q=langle s,t rangle$ has infinitely many primes lying over it, e.g., $langle x,q(y) rangle$ where $q(y)in k[y]$ is an arbitrary nonzero, noninvertible element that is irreducible. Since $Q$ is contained in $P$, for every $fin Asetminus P$, also $f$ is in $Asetminus Q$. Thus, the ideal $QA_f$ is a prime ideal of $A_f$. So the induced ring homomorphism $A_f to B_{p(f)}$ still admits a prime ideal $QA_f$ that has infinitely many primes lying over it in $B_{p(f)}$.
There are also counterexamples to the corollary if we allow that the fiber is empty (but the morphism is still birational). Namely, consider the self-map, $$r:Ato A, r(s) = s, r(t) = st, r(u) = 1-su.$$ This ring homomorphism is birational. The fiber over $langle s,t,urangle$ is empty. Yet the fiber over $langle s,t rangle$ is infinite, as above.
add a comment |
The comment of @MatthieuRomagny gives a link to some positive answers under additional hypotheses. Nonetheless, the answer is negative without further hypotheses. Before stating the negative counterexamples, let me state the positive result (that I suspect motivated this question).
Zariski's Main Theorem (Original Form). A birational (separated, finite type) morphism to a normal (finite type) $k$-scheme restricts as an open immersion on the maximal open of the domain where the morphism is quasi-finite.
One excellent reference for Zariski's Main Theorem is Section III.9 of the following (the formulation above is on p. 288).
MR0971985 (89k:14001)
Mumford, David
The red book of varieties and schemes.
Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1358.
Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1988.
Corollary of ZMT. For a birational (separated, finite type) morphism to a normal (finite type) $k$-scheme, for every point of the target where the fiber is nonempty and finite, there exists an open neighborhood of the point over which the morphism is an isomorphism.
Counterexamples. Nonetheless, if you remove the hypothesis that the morphism is birational, there are counterexamples. Here is one.
Let $k$ be a field, and let $A$ be the polynomial ring $k[s,t,u]$. Let $B$ be the ring $k[x,y,z,w]/langle zw-1 rangle$. Both of these are finitely generated $k$-algebras that are regular, in fact $k$-smooth. Now consider the $k$-algebra homomorphism, $$p:Ato B, p(s) = x(1-x), p(t) = xy, p(u) = z(1-xz).$$ If we invert the element $s$ in $A$ and the image element $x(1-x)$ in $B$, then the induced ring homomorphism is finite and flat of rank $4$. In particular, the localized ring homomorphism is injective. Since the natural map from $A$ to $A[1/s]$ is injective, also $p$ is injective.
Finally, consider the prime ideal $P=langle s,t,urangle$ in $A$. There is precisely one prime lying above this prime, namely $langle x-1,y,z-1,w-1rangle$. However, the prime ideal $Q=langle s,t rangle$ has infinitely many primes lying over it, e.g., $langle x,q(y) rangle$ where $q(y)in k[y]$ is an arbitrary nonzero, noninvertible element that is irreducible. Since $Q$ is contained in $P$, for every $fin Asetminus P$, also $f$ is in $Asetminus Q$. Thus, the ideal $QA_f$ is a prime ideal of $A_f$. So the induced ring homomorphism $A_f to B_{p(f)}$ still admits a prime ideal $QA_f$ that has infinitely many primes lying over it in $B_{p(f)}$.
There are also counterexamples to the corollary if we allow that the fiber is empty (but the morphism is still birational). Namely, consider the self-map, $$r:Ato A, r(s) = s, r(t) = st, r(u) = 1-su.$$ This ring homomorphism is birational. The fiber over $langle s,t,urangle$ is empty. Yet the fiber over $langle s,t rangle$ is infinite, as above.
The comment of @MatthieuRomagny gives a link to some positive answers under additional hypotheses. Nonetheless, the answer is negative without further hypotheses. Before stating the negative counterexamples, let me state the positive result (that I suspect motivated this question).
Zariski's Main Theorem (Original Form). A birational (separated, finite type) morphism to a normal (finite type) $k$-scheme restricts as an open immersion on the maximal open of the domain where the morphism is quasi-finite.
One excellent reference for Zariski's Main Theorem is Section III.9 of the following (the formulation above is on p. 288).
MR0971985 (89k:14001)
Mumford, David
The red book of varieties and schemes.
Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1358.
Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1988.
Corollary of ZMT. For a birational (separated, finite type) morphism to a normal (finite type) $k$-scheme, for every point of the target where the fiber is nonempty and finite, there exists an open neighborhood of the point over which the morphism is an isomorphism.
Counterexamples. Nonetheless, if you remove the hypothesis that the morphism is birational, there are counterexamples. Here is one.
Let $k$ be a field, and let $A$ be the polynomial ring $k[s,t,u]$. Let $B$ be the ring $k[x,y,z,w]/langle zw-1 rangle$. Both of these are finitely generated $k$-algebras that are regular, in fact $k$-smooth. Now consider the $k$-algebra homomorphism, $$p:Ato B, p(s) = x(1-x), p(t) = xy, p(u) = z(1-xz).$$ If we invert the element $s$ in $A$ and the image element $x(1-x)$ in $B$, then the induced ring homomorphism is finite and flat of rank $4$. In particular, the localized ring homomorphism is injective. Since the natural map from $A$ to $A[1/s]$ is injective, also $p$ is injective.
Finally, consider the prime ideal $P=langle s,t,urangle$ in $A$. There is precisely one prime lying above this prime, namely $langle x-1,y,z-1,w-1rangle$. However, the prime ideal $Q=langle s,t rangle$ has infinitely many primes lying over it, e.g., $langle x,q(y) rangle$ where $q(y)in k[y]$ is an arbitrary nonzero, noninvertible element that is irreducible. Since $Q$ is contained in $P$, for every $fin Asetminus P$, also $f$ is in $Asetminus Q$. Thus, the ideal $QA_f$ is a prime ideal of $A_f$. So the induced ring homomorphism $A_f to B_{p(f)}$ still admits a prime ideal $QA_f$ that has infinitely many primes lying over it in $B_{p(f)}$.
There are also counterexamples to the corollary if we allow that the fiber is empty (but the morphism is still birational). Namely, consider the self-map, $$r:Ato A, r(s) = s, r(t) = st, r(u) = 1-su.$$ This ring homomorphism is birational. The fiber over $langle s,t,urangle$ is empty. Yet the fiber over $langle s,t rangle$ is infinite, as above.
edited 2 days ago
community wiki
3 revs
Jason Starr
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f319855%2fa-question-on-dominant-morphism-of-affine-schemes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
I am not able to understand where is the dominant morphism of Affine schemes...
– Praphulla Koushik
Jan 1 at 6:23
@PraphullaKoushik: just the inclusion $A to B$ ...
– user521337
Jan 1 at 6:25
Do you think title can be edited to make it clearer or it is difficult to say this in one line.. I am not questioning anything I am simply asking.. Can you tell how does algebraic geometry tag is relevant here?
– Praphulla Koushik
Jan 1 at 6:26
@PraphullaKoushik: In algebraic geometric terms ... let $X,Y$ be integral, finite type, affine $mathbb C$-schemes with $dim X=dim Y$ with $Y$ non-singular, normal. Let $f: X to Y$ be a dominant morphism. Let $U:={yin Y : f^{-1}({y}) $ is finite and non-empty $}$ . Question: Is $U$ open ?
– user521337
Jan 1 at 6:32
2
This is a duplicate from [mathoverflow.net/questions/193/…
– Matthieu Romagny
2 days ago