A question on dominant morphism of affine schemes












5














Let $A subseteq B$ be a ring extension where $A,B$ are both finitely generated $mathbb C$-domain of the same Krull dimension. Also assume $A$ is regular (i.e. $A_{ mathfrak p}$ is regular local ring for every prime ideal $mathfrak p$ of $A$ ).



If $P$ is a prime ideal of $A$ with finitely many prime ideals of $B$ lying over it , then does there exist $f in A setminus P$ such that every prime ideal of $A_f$ has finitely many prime ideals of $B$ lying over it ?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • I am not able to understand where is the dominant morphism of Affine schemes...
    – Praphulla Koushik
    Jan 1 at 6:23










  • @PraphullaKoushik: just the inclusion $A to B$ ...
    – user521337
    Jan 1 at 6:25












  • Do you think title can be edited to make it clearer or it is difficult to say this in one line.. I am not questioning anything I am simply asking.. Can you tell how does algebraic geometry tag is relevant here?
    – Praphulla Koushik
    Jan 1 at 6:26












  • @PraphullaKoushik: In algebraic geometric terms ... let $X,Y$ be integral, finite type, affine $mathbb C$-schemes with $dim X=dim Y$ with $Y$ non-singular, normal. Let $f: X to Y$ be a dominant morphism. Let $U:={yin Y : f^{-1}({y}) $ is finite and non-empty $}$ . Question: Is $U$ open ?
    – user521337
    Jan 1 at 6:32








  • 2




    This is a duplicate from [mathoverflow.net/questions/193/…
    – Matthieu Romagny
    2 days ago
















5














Let $A subseteq B$ be a ring extension where $A,B$ are both finitely generated $mathbb C$-domain of the same Krull dimension. Also assume $A$ is regular (i.e. $A_{ mathfrak p}$ is regular local ring for every prime ideal $mathfrak p$ of $A$ ).



If $P$ is a prime ideal of $A$ with finitely many prime ideals of $B$ lying over it , then does there exist $f in A setminus P$ such that every prime ideal of $A_f$ has finitely many prime ideals of $B$ lying over it ?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • I am not able to understand where is the dominant morphism of Affine schemes...
    – Praphulla Koushik
    Jan 1 at 6:23










  • @PraphullaKoushik: just the inclusion $A to B$ ...
    – user521337
    Jan 1 at 6:25












  • Do you think title can be edited to make it clearer or it is difficult to say this in one line.. I am not questioning anything I am simply asking.. Can you tell how does algebraic geometry tag is relevant here?
    – Praphulla Koushik
    Jan 1 at 6:26












  • @PraphullaKoushik: In algebraic geometric terms ... let $X,Y$ be integral, finite type, affine $mathbb C$-schemes with $dim X=dim Y$ with $Y$ non-singular, normal. Let $f: X to Y$ be a dominant morphism. Let $U:={yin Y : f^{-1}({y}) $ is finite and non-empty $}$ . Question: Is $U$ open ?
    – user521337
    Jan 1 at 6:32








  • 2




    This is a duplicate from [mathoverflow.net/questions/193/…
    – Matthieu Romagny
    2 days ago














5












5








5







Let $A subseteq B$ be a ring extension where $A,B$ are both finitely generated $mathbb C$-domain of the same Krull dimension. Also assume $A$ is regular (i.e. $A_{ mathfrak p}$ is regular local ring for every prime ideal $mathfrak p$ of $A$ ).



If $P$ is a prime ideal of $A$ with finitely many prime ideals of $B$ lying over it , then does there exist $f in A setminus P$ such that every prime ideal of $A_f$ has finitely many prime ideals of $B$ lying over it ?










share|cite|improve this question













Let $A subseteq B$ be a ring extension where $A,B$ are both finitely generated $mathbb C$-domain of the same Krull dimension. Also assume $A$ is regular (i.e. $A_{ mathfrak p}$ is regular local ring for every prime ideal $mathfrak p$ of $A$ ).



If $P$ is a prime ideal of $A$ with finitely many prime ideals of $B$ lying over it , then does there exist $f in A setminus P$ such that every prime ideal of $A_f$ has finitely many prime ideals of $B$ lying over it ?







ag.algebraic-geometry ac.commutative-algebra dimension-theory






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 1 at 5:41









user521337

56115




56115












  • I am not able to understand where is the dominant morphism of Affine schemes...
    – Praphulla Koushik
    Jan 1 at 6:23










  • @PraphullaKoushik: just the inclusion $A to B$ ...
    – user521337
    Jan 1 at 6:25












  • Do you think title can be edited to make it clearer or it is difficult to say this in one line.. I am not questioning anything I am simply asking.. Can you tell how does algebraic geometry tag is relevant here?
    – Praphulla Koushik
    Jan 1 at 6:26












  • @PraphullaKoushik: In algebraic geometric terms ... let $X,Y$ be integral, finite type, affine $mathbb C$-schemes with $dim X=dim Y$ with $Y$ non-singular, normal. Let $f: X to Y$ be a dominant morphism. Let $U:={yin Y : f^{-1}({y}) $ is finite and non-empty $}$ . Question: Is $U$ open ?
    – user521337
    Jan 1 at 6:32








  • 2




    This is a duplicate from [mathoverflow.net/questions/193/…
    – Matthieu Romagny
    2 days ago


















  • I am not able to understand where is the dominant morphism of Affine schemes...
    – Praphulla Koushik
    Jan 1 at 6:23










  • @PraphullaKoushik: just the inclusion $A to B$ ...
    – user521337
    Jan 1 at 6:25












  • Do you think title can be edited to make it clearer or it is difficult to say this in one line.. I am not questioning anything I am simply asking.. Can you tell how does algebraic geometry tag is relevant here?
    – Praphulla Koushik
    Jan 1 at 6:26












  • @PraphullaKoushik: In algebraic geometric terms ... let $X,Y$ be integral, finite type, affine $mathbb C$-schemes with $dim X=dim Y$ with $Y$ non-singular, normal. Let $f: X to Y$ be a dominant morphism. Let $U:={yin Y : f^{-1}({y}) $ is finite and non-empty $}$ . Question: Is $U$ open ?
    – user521337
    Jan 1 at 6:32








  • 2




    This is a duplicate from [mathoverflow.net/questions/193/…
    – Matthieu Romagny
    2 days ago
















I am not able to understand where is the dominant morphism of Affine schemes...
– Praphulla Koushik
Jan 1 at 6:23




I am not able to understand where is the dominant morphism of Affine schemes...
– Praphulla Koushik
Jan 1 at 6:23












@PraphullaKoushik: just the inclusion $A to B$ ...
– user521337
Jan 1 at 6:25






@PraphullaKoushik: just the inclusion $A to B$ ...
– user521337
Jan 1 at 6:25














Do you think title can be edited to make it clearer or it is difficult to say this in one line.. I am not questioning anything I am simply asking.. Can you tell how does algebraic geometry tag is relevant here?
– Praphulla Koushik
Jan 1 at 6:26






Do you think title can be edited to make it clearer or it is difficult to say this in one line.. I am not questioning anything I am simply asking.. Can you tell how does algebraic geometry tag is relevant here?
– Praphulla Koushik
Jan 1 at 6:26














@PraphullaKoushik: In algebraic geometric terms ... let $X,Y$ be integral, finite type, affine $mathbb C$-schemes with $dim X=dim Y$ with $Y$ non-singular, normal. Let $f: X to Y$ be a dominant morphism. Let $U:={yin Y : f^{-1}({y}) $ is finite and non-empty $}$ . Question: Is $U$ open ?
– user521337
Jan 1 at 6:32






@PraphullaKoushik: In algebraic geometric terms ... let $X,Y$ be integral, finite type, affine $mathbb C$-schemes with $dim X=dim Y$ with $Y$ non-singular, normal. Let $f: X to Y$ be a dominant morphism. Let $U:={yin Y : f^{-1}({y}) $ is finite and non-empty $}$ . Question: Is $U$ open ?
– user521337
Jan 1 at 6:32






2




2




This is a duplicate from [mathoverflow.net/questions/193/…
– Matthieu Romagny
2 days ago




This is a duplicate from [mathoverflow.net/questions/193/…
– Matthieu Romagny
2 days ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















5














The comment of @MatthieuRomagny gives a link to some positive answers under additional hypotheses. Nonetheless, the answer is negative without further hypotheses. Before stating the negative counterexamples, let me state the positive result (that I suspect motivated this question).



Zariski's Main Theorem (Original Form). A birational (separated, finite type) morphism to a normal (finite type) $k$-scheme restricts as an open immersion on the maximal open of the domain where the morphism is quasi-finite.



One excellent reference for Zariski's Main Theorem is Section III.9 of the following (the formulation above is on p. 288).



MR0971985 (89k:14001)

Mumford, David

The red book of varieties and schemes.

Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1358.

Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1988.



Corollary of ZMT. For a birational (separated, finite type) morphism to a normal (finite type) $k$-scheme, for every point of the target where the fiber is nonempty and finite, there exists an open neighborhood of the point over which the morphism is an isomorphism.



Counterexamples. Nonetheless, if you remove the hypothesis that the morphism is birational, there are counterexamples. Here is one.



Let $k$ be a field, and let $A$ be the polynomial ring $k[s,t,u]$. Let $B$ be the ring $k[x,y,z,w]/langle zw-1 rangle$. Both of these are finitely generated $k$-algebras that are regular, in fact $k$-smooth. Now consider the $k$-algebra homomorphism, $$p:Ato B, p(s) = x(1-x), p(t) = xy, p(u) = z(1-xz).$$ If we invert the element $s$ in $A$ and the image element $x(1-x)$ in $B$, then the induced ring homomorphism is finite and flat of rank $4$. In particular, the localized ring homomorphism is injective. Since the natural map from $A$ to $A[1/s]$ is injective, also $p$ is injective.



Finally, consider the prime ideal $P=langle s,t,urangle$ in $A$. There is precisely one prime lying above this prime, namely $langle x-1,y,z-1,w-1rangle$. However, the prime ideal $Q=langle s,t rangle$ has infinitely many primes lying over it, e.g., $langle x,q(y) rangle$ where $q(y)in k[y]$ is an arbitrary nonzero, noninvertible element that is irreducible. Since $Q$ is contained in $P$, for every $fin Asetminus P$, also $f$ is in $Asetminus Q$. Thus, the ideal $QA_f$ is a prime ideal of $A_f$. So the induced ring homomorphism $A_f to B_{p(f)}$ still admits a prime ideal $QA_f$ that has infinitely many primes lying over it in $B_{p(f)}$.



There are also counterexamples to the corollary if we allow that the fiber is empty (but the morphism is still birational). Namely, consider the self-map, $$r:Ato A, r(s) = s, r(t) = st, r(u) = 1-su.$$ This ring homomorphism is birational. The fiber over $langle s,t,urangle$ is empty. Yet the fiber over $langle s,t rangle$ is infinite, as above.






share|cite|improve this answer























    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "504"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f319855%2fa-question-on-dominant-morphism-of-affine-schemes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5














    The comment of @MatthieuRomagny gives a link to some positive answers under additional hypotheses. Nonetheless, the answer is negative without further hypotheses. Before stating the negative counterexamples, let me state the positive result (that I suspect motivated this question).



    Zariski's Main Theorem (Original Form). A birational (separated, finite type) morphism to a normal (finite type) $k$-scheme restricts as an open immersion on the maximal open of the domain where the morphism is quasi-finite.



    One excellent reference for Zariski's Main Theorem is Section III.9 of the following (the formulation above is on p. 288).



    MR0971985 (89k:14001)

    Mumford, David

    The red book of varieties and schemes.

    Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1358.

    Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1988.



    Corollary of ZMT. For a birational (separated, finite type) morphism to a normal (finite type) $k$-scheme, for every point of the target where the fiber is nonempty and finite, there exists an open neighborhood of the point over which the morphism is an isomorphism.



    Counterexamples. Nonetheless, if you remove the hypothesis that the morphism is birational, there are counterexamples. Here is one.



    Let $k$ be a field, and let $A$ be the polynomial ring $k[s,t,u]$. Let $B$ be the ring $k[x,y,z,w]/langle zw-1 rangle$. Both of these are finitely generated $k$-algebras that are regular, in fact $k$-smooth. Now consider the $k$-algebra homomorphism, $$p:Ato B, p(s) = x(1-x), p(t) = xy, p(u) = z(1-xz).$$ If we invert the element $s$ in $A$ and the image element $x(1-x)$ in $B$, then the induced ring homomorphism is finite and flat of rank $4$. In particular, the localized ring homomorphism is injective. Since the natural map from $A$ to $A[1/s]$ is injective, also $p$ is injective.



    Finally, consider the prime ideal $P=langle s,t,urangle$ in $A$. There is precisely one prime lying above this prime, namely $langle x-1,y,z-1,w-1rangle$. However, the prime ideal $Q=langle s,t rangle$ has infinitely many primes lying over it, e.g., $langle x,q(y) rangle$ where $q(y)in k[y]$ is an arbitrary nonzero, noninvertible element that is irreducible. Since $Q$ is contained in $P$, for every $fin Asetminus P$, also $f$ is in $Asetminus Q$. Thus, the ideal $QA_f$ is a prime ideal of $A_f$. So the induced ring homomorphism $A_f to B_{p(f)}$ still admits a prime ideal $QA_f$ that has infinitely many primes lying over it in $B_{p(f)}$.



    There are also counterexamples to the corollary if we allow that the fiber is empty (but the morphism is still birational). Namely, consider the self-map, $$r:Ato A, r(s) = s, r(t) = st, r(u) = 1-su.$$ This ring homomorphism is birational. The fiber over $langle s,t,urangle$ is empty. Yet the fiber over $langle s,t rangle$ is infinite, as above.






    share|cite|improve this answer




























      5














      The comment of @MatthieuRomagny gives a link to some positive answers under additional hypotheses. Nonetheless, the answer is negative without further hypotheses. Before stating the negative counterexamples, let me state the positive result (that I suspect motivated this question).



      Zariski's Main Theorem (Original Form). A birational (separated, finite type) morphism to a normal (finite type) $k$-scheme restricts as an open immersion on the maximal open of the domain where the morphism is quasi-finite.



      One excellent reference for Zariski's Main Theorem is Section III.9 of the following (the formulation above is on p. 288).



      MR0971985 (89k:14001)

      Mumford, David

      The red book of varieties and schemes.

      Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1358.

      Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1988.



      Corollary of ZMT. For a birational (separated, finite type) morphism to a normal (finite type) $k$-scheme, for every point of the target where the fiber is nonempty and finite, there exists an open neighborhood of the point over which the morphism is an isomorphism.



      Counterexamples. Nonetheless, if you remove the hypothesis that the morphism is birational, there are counterexamples. Here is one.



      Let $k$ be a field, and let $A$ be the polynomial ring $k[s,t,u]$. Let $B$ be the ring $k[x,y,z,w]/langle zw-1 rangle$. Both of these are finitely generated $k$-algebras that are regular, in fact $k$-smooth. Now consider the $k$-algebra homomorphism, $$p:Ato B, p(s) = x(1-x), p(t) = xy, p(u) = z(1-xz).$$ If we invert the element $s$ in $A$ and the image element $x(1-x)$ in $B$, then the induced ring homomorphism is finite and flat of rank $4$. In particular, the localized ring homomorphism is injective. Since the natural map from $A$ to $A[1/s]$ is injective, also $p$ is injective.



      Finally, consider the prime ideal $P=langle s,t,urangle$ in $A$. There is precisely one prime lying above this prime, namely $langle x-1,y,z-1,w-1rangle$. However, the prime ideal $Q=langle s,t rangle$ has infinitely many primes lying over it, e.g., $langle x,q(y) rangle$ where $q(y)in k[y]$ is an arbitrary nonzero, noninvertible element that is irreducible. Since $Q$ is contained in $P$, for every $fin Asetminus P$, also $f$ is in $Asetminus Q$. Thus, the ideal $QA_f$ is a prime ideal of $A_f$. So the induced ring homomorphism $A_f to B_{p(f)}$ still admits a prime ideal $QA_f$ that has infinitely many primes lying over it in $B_{p(f)}$.



      There are also counterexamples to the corollary if we allow that the fiber is empty (but the morphism is still birational). Namely, consider the self-map, $$r:Ato A, r(s) = s, r(t) = st, r(u) = 1-su.$$ This ring homomorphism is birational. The fiber over $langle s,t,urangle$ is empty. Yet the fiber over $langle s,t rangle$ is infinite, as above.






      share|cite|improve this answer


























        5












        5








        5






        The comment of @MatthieuRomagny gives a link to some positive answers under additional hypotheses. Nonetheless, the answer is negative without further hypotheses. Before stating the negative counterexamples, let me state the positive result (that I suspect motivated this question).



        Zariski's Main Theorem (Original Form). A birational (separated, finite type) morphism to a normal (finite type) $k$-scheme restricts as an open immersion on the maximal open of the domain where the morphism is quasi-finite.



        One excellent reference for Zariski's Main Theorem is Section III.9 of the following (the formulation above is on p. 288).



        MR0971985 (89k:14001)

        Mumford, David

        The red book of varieties and schemes.

        Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1358.

        Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1988.



        Corollary of ZMT. For a birational (separated, finite type) morphism to a normal (finite type) $k$-scheme, for every point of the target where the fiber is nonempty and finite, there exists an open neighborhood of the point over which the morphism is an isomorphism.



        Counterexamples. Nonetheless, if you remove the hypothesis that the morphism is birational, there are counterexamples. Here is one.



        Let $k$ be a field, and let $A$ be the polynomial ring $k[s,t,u]$. Let $B$ be the ring $k[x,y,z,w]/langle zw-1 rangle$. Both of these are finitely generated $k$-algebras that are regular, in fact $k$-smooth. Now consider the $k$-algebra homomorphism, $$p:Ato B, p(s) = x(1-x), p(t) = xy, p(u) = z(1-xz).$$ If we invert the element $s$ in $A$ and the image element $x(1-x)$ in $B$, then the induced ring homomorphism is finite and flat of rank $4$. In particular, the localized ring homomorphism is injective. Since the natural map from $A$ to $A[1/s]$ is injective, also $p$ is injective.



        Finally, consider the prime ideal $P=langle s,t,urangle$ in $A$. There is precisely one prime lying above this prime, namely $langle x-1,y,z-1,w-1rangle$. However, the prime ideal $Q=langle s,t rangle$ has infinitely many primes lying over it, e.g., $langle x,q(y) rangle$ where $q(y)in k[y]$ is an arbitrary nonzero, noninvertible element that is irreducible. Since $Q$ is contained in $P$, for every $fin Asetminus P$, also $f$ is in $Asetminus Q$. Thus, the ideal $QA_f$ is a prime ideal of $A_f$. So the induced ring homomorphism $A_f to B_{p(f)}$ still admits a prime ideal $QA_f$ that has infinitely many primes lying over it in $B_{p(f)}$.



        There are also counterexamples to the corollary if we allow that the fiber is empty (but the morphism is still birational). Namely, consider the self-map, $$r:Ato A, r(s) = s, r(t) = st, r(u) = 1-su.$$ This ring homomorphism is birational. The fiber over $langle s,t,urangle$ is empty. Yet the fiber over $langle s,t rangle$ is infinite, as above.






        share|cite|improve this answer














        The comment of @MatthieuRomagny gives a link to some positive answers under additional hypotheses. Nonetheless, the answer is negative without further hypotheses. Before stating the negative counterexamples, let me state the positive result (that I suspect motivated this question).



        Zariski's Main Theorem (Original Form). A birational (separated, finite type) morphism to a normal (finite type) $k$-scheme restricts as an open immersion on the maximal open of the domain where the morphism is quasi-finite.



        One excellent reference for Zariski's Main Theorem is Section III.9 of the following (the formulation above is on p. 288).



        MR0971985 (89k:14001)

        Mumford, David

        The red book of varieties and schemes.

        Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1358.

        Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1988.



        Corollary of ZMT. For a birational (separated, finite type) morphism to a normal (finite type) $k$-scheme, for every point of the target where the fiber is nonempty and finite, there exists an open neighborhood of the point over which the morphism is an isomorphism.



        Counterexamples. Nonetheless, if you remove the hypothesis that the morphism is birational, there are counterexamples. Here is one.



        Let $k$ be a field, and let $A$ be the polynomial ring $k[s,t,u]$. Let $B$ be the ring $k[x,y,z,w]/langle zw-1 rangle$. Both of these are finitely generated $k$-algebras that are regular, in fact $k$-smooth. Now consider the $k$-algebra homomorphism, $$p:Ato B, p(s) = x(1-x), p(t) = xy, p(u) = z(1-xz).$$ If we invert the element $s$ in $A$ and the image element $x(1-x)$ in $B$, then the induced ring homomorphism is finite and flat of rank $4$. In particular, the localized ring homomorphism is injective. Since the natural map from $A$ to $A[1/s]$ is injective, also $p$ is injective.



        Finally, consider the prime ideal $P=langle s,t,urangle$ in $A$. There is precisely one prime lying above this prime, namely $langle x-1,y,z-1,w-1rangle$. However, the prime ideal $Q=langle s,t rangle$ has infinitely many primes lying over it, e.g., $langle x,q(y) rangle$ where $q(y)in k[y]$ is an arbitrary nonzero, noninvertible element that is irreducible. Since $Q$ is contained in $P$, for every $fin Asetminus P$, also $f$ is in $Asetminus Q$. Thus, the ideal $QA_f$ is a prime ideal of $A_f$. So the induced ring homomorphism $A_f to B_{p(f)}$ still admits a prime ideal $QA_f$ that has infinitely many primes lying over it in $B_{p(f)}$.



        There are also counterexamples to the corollary if we allow that the fiber is empty (but the morphism is still birational). Namely, consider the self-map, $$r:Ato A, r(s) = s, r(t) = st, r(u) = 1-su.$$ This ring homomorphism is birational. The fiber over $langle s,t,urangle$ is empty. Yet the fiber over $langle s,t rangle$ is infinite, as above.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited 2 days ago


























        community wiki





        3 revs
        Jason Starr































            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f319855%2fa-question-on-dominant-morphism-of-affine-schemes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

            Alcedinidae

            Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]