Strange letter puzzle [duplicate]
This question already has an answer here:
What is the solution?
4 answers
What has $4$ letters, sometimes $9$ letters, always $6$ letters and never $5$ letters. How?
Hint: $4$ letters
word wordplay
marked as duplicate by Bass, rhsquared, Glorfindel, Chowzen, athin 2 days ago
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
add a comment |
This question already has an answer here:
What is the solution?
4 answers
What has $4$ letters, sometimes $9$ letters, always $6$ letters and never $5$ letters. How?
Hint: $4$ letters
word wordplay
marked as duplicate by Bass, rhsquared, Glorfindel, Chowzen, athin 2 days ago
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
add a comment |
This question already has an answer here:
What is the solution?
4 answers
What has $4$ letters, sometimes $9$ letters, always $6$ letters and never $5$ letters. How?
Hint: $4$ letters
word wordplay
This question already has an answer here:
What is the solution?
4 answers
What has $4$ letters, sometimes $9$ letters, always $6$ letters and never $5$ letters. How?
Hint: $4$ letters
This question already has an answer here:
What is the solution?
4 answers
word wordplay
word wordplay
edited 17 hours ago
boboquack
14.9k145115
14.9k145115
asked 2 days ago
Mohammad Zuhair Khan
1336
1336
marked as duplicate by Bass, rhsquared, Glorfindel, Chowzen, athin 2 days ago
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
marked as duplicate by Bass, rhsquared, Glorfindel, Chowzen, athin 2 days ago
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Well; for a start:
The word "what" itself has four letters, the word "sometimes" has nine, the word "always" has six letters and the word "never" has five. So...
What has $4$ letters, sometimes $9$ letters, always $6$ letters and never $5$ letters. How? $3$ letters!
* worth noting that this was entirely @WAF in the comments.
You got the trick, but how?
– Mohammad Zuhair Khan
2 days ago
Think literally
– Mohammad Zuhair Khan
2 days ago
4
Maybe just apply the same rule to the bold word as well.
– WAF
2 days ago
@WAF good thought — why didn't I think of that? If it's correct, I owe you.
– Hugh
2 days ago
Heh. It's all yours! Always happy to collaborate.
– WAF
yesterday
add a comment |
I kind of second Hugh's answer, but with a slight addition. What's in the question's body isn't really a question. It's a statement. What has 4 letters, sometimes 9 letters, always 6 letters and never 5 letters. It's just a count of the number of letters in each word succeeding the comma. This is like a guide/legend to answer the real question.
The real question
lies in the title ==> But, how is this possible?
The answer:
Taking the prototype in the statement given above... this has 4 letters. That is how THIS is possible. In other words... the answer to How is THIS possible?
1
Ha, lol. I should havs got that. Well done
– Hugh
2 days ago
1
Ummm... It was actually about "How"... A really good conclusion but the fact that the title wasn't allowing me less than 15 characters. I am sorry
– Mohammad Zuhair Khan
2 days ago
1
"How?" is a question. it implies How about "how"?
– Ahmed Abdelhameed
yesterday
I get it now @MohammadZuhairKhan. I took the title in the literal way.. good one though
– Rai
17 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Well; for a start:
The word "what" itself has four letters, the word "sometimes" has nine, the word "always" has six letters and the word "never" has five. So...
What has $4$ letters, sometimes $9$ letters, always $6$ letters and never $5$ letters. How? $3$ letters!
* worth noting that this was entirely @WAF in the comments.
You got the trick, but how?
– Mohammad Zuhair Khan
2 days ago
Think literally
– Mohammad Zuhair Khan
2 days ago
4
Maybe just apply the same rule to the bold word as well.
– WAF
2 days ago
@WAF good thought — why didn't I think of that? If it's correct, I owe you.
– Hugh
2 days ago
Heh. It's all yours! Always happy to collaborate.
– WAF
yesterday
add a comment |
Well; for a start:
The word "what" itself has four letters, the word "sometimes" has nine, the word "always" has six letters and the word "never" has five. So...
What has $4$ letters, sometimes $9$ letters, always $6$ letters and never $5$ letters. How? $3$ letters!
* worth noting that this was entirely @WAF in the comments.
You got the trick, but how?
– Mohammad Zuhair Khan
2 days ago
Think literally
– Mohammad Zuhair Khan
2 days ago
4
Maybe just apply the same rule to the bold word as well.
– WAF
2 days ago
@WAF good thought — why didn't I think of that? If it's correct, I owe you.
– Hugh
2 days ago
Heh. It's all yours! Always happy to collaborate.
– WAF
yesterday
add a comment |
Well; for a start:
The word "what" itself has four letters, the word "sometimes" has nine, the word "always" has six letters and the word "never" has five. So...
What has $4$ letters, sometimes $9$ letters, always $6$ letters and never $5$ letters. How? $3$ letters!
* worth noting that this was entirely @WAF in the comments.
Well; for a start:
The word "what" itself has four letters, the word "sometimes" has nine, the word "always" has six letters and the word "never" has five. So...
What has $4$ letters, sometimes $9$ letters, always $6$ letters and never $5$ letters. How? $3$ letters!
* worth noting that this was entirely @WAF in the comments.
edited 2 days ago
answered 2 days ago
Hugh
1,4681617
1,4681617
You got the trick, but how?
– Mohammad Zuhair Khan
2 days ago
Think literally
– Mohammad Zuhair Khan
2 days ago
4
Maybe just apply the same rule to the bold word as well.
– WAF
2 days ago
@WAF good thought — why didn't I think of that? If it's correct, I owe you.
– Hugh
2 days ago
Heh. It's all yours! Always happy to collaborate.
– WAF
yesterday
add a comment |
You got the trick, but how?
– Mohammad Zuhair Khan
2 days ago
Think literally
– Mohammad Zuhair Khan
2 days ago
4
Maybe just apply the same rule to the bold word as well.
– WAF
2 days ago
@WAF good thought — why didn't I think of that? If it's correct, I owe you.
– Hugh
2 days ago
Heh. It's all yours! Always happy to collaborate.
– WAF
yesterday
You got the trick, but how?
– Mohammad Zuhair Khan
2 days ago
You got the trick, but how?
– Mohammad Zuhair Khan
2 days ago
Think literally
– Mohammad Zuhair Khan
2 days ago
Think literally
– Mohammad Zuhair Khan
2 days ago
4
4
Maybe just apply the same rule to the bold word as well.
– WAF
2 days ago
Maybe just apply the same rule to the bold word as well.
– WAF
2 days ago
@WAF good thought — why didn't I think of that? If it's correct, I owe you.
– Hugh
2 days ago
@WAF good thought — why didn't I think of that? If it's correct, I owe you.
– Hugh
2 days ago
Heh. It's all yours! Always happy to collaborate.
– WAF
yesterday
Heh. It's all yours! Always happy to collaborate.
– WAF
yesterday
add a comment |
I kind of second Hugh's answer, but with a slight addition. What's in the question's body isn't really a question. It's a statement. What has 4 letters, sometimes 9 letters, always 6 letters and never 5 letters. It's just a count of the number of letters in each word succeeding the comma. This is like a guide/legend to answer the real question.
The real question
lies in the title ==> But, how is this possible?
The answer:
Taking the prototype in the statement given above... this has 4 letters. That is how THIS is possible. In other words... the answer to How is THIS possible?
1
Ha, lol. I should havs got that. Well done
– Hugh
2 days ago
1
Ummm... It was actually about "How"... A really good conclusion but the fact that the title wasn't allowing me less than 15 characters. I am sorry
– Mohammad Zuhair Khan
2 days ago
1
"How?" is a question. it implies How about "how"?
– Ahmed Abdelhameed
yesterday
I get it now @MohammadZuhairKhan. I took the title in the literal way.. good one though
– Rai
17 hours ago
add a comment |
I kind of second Hugh's answer, but with a slight addition. What's in the question's body isn't really a question. It's a statement. What has 4 letters, sometimes 9 letters, always 6 letters and never 5 letters. It's just a count of the number of letters in each word succeeding the comma. This is like a guide/legend to answer the real question.
The real question
lies in the title ==> But, how is this possible?
The answer:
Taking the prototype in the statement given above... this has 4 letters. That is how THIS is possible. In other words... the answer to How is THIS possible?
1
Ha, lol. I should havs got that. Well done
– Hugh
2 days ago
1
Ummm... It was actually about "How"... A really good conclusion but the fact that the title wasn't allowing me less than 15 characters. I am sorry
– Mohammad Zuhair Khan
2 days ago
1
"How?" is a question. it implies How about "how"?
– Ahmed Abdelhameed
yesterday
I get it now @MohammadZuhairKhan. I took the title in the literal way.. good one though
– Rai
17 hours ago
add a comment |
I kind of second Hugh's answer, but with a slight addition. What's in the question's body isn't really a question. It's a statement. What has 4 letters, sometimes 9 letters, always 6 letters and never 5 letters. It's just a count of the number of letters in each word succeeding the comma. This is like a guide/legend to answer the real question.
The real question
lies in the title ==> But, how is this possible?
The answer:
Taking the prototype in the statement given above... this has 4 letters. That is how THIS is possible. In other words... the answer to How is THIS possible?
I kind of second Hugh's answer, but with a slight addition. What's in the question's body isn't really a question. It's a statement. What has 4 letters, sometimes 9 letters, always 6 letters and never 5 letters. It's just a count of the number of letters in each word succeeding the comma. This is like a guide/legend to answer the real question.
The real question
lies in the title ==> But, how is this possible?
The answer:
Taking the prototype in the statement given above... this has 4 letters. That is how THIS is possible. In other words... the answer to How is THIS possible?
answered 2 days ago
Rai
68119
68119
1
Ha, lol. I should havs got that. Well done
– Hugh
2 days ago
1
Ummm... It was actually about "How"... A really good conclusion but the fact that the title wasn't allowing me less than 15 characters. I am sorry
– Mohammad Zuhair Khan
2 days ago
1
"How?" is a question. it implies How about "how"?
– Ahmed Abdelhameed
yesterday
I get it now @MohammadZuhairKhan. I took the title in the literal way.. good one though
– Rai
17 hours ago
add a comment |
1
Ha, lol. I should havs got that. Well done
– Hugh
2 days ago
1
Ummm... It was actually about "How"... A really good conclusion but the fact that the title wasn't allowing me less than 15 characters. I am sorry
– Mohammad Zuhair Khan
2 days ago
1
"How?" is a question. it implies How about "how"?
– Ahmed Abdelhameed
yesterday
I get it now @MohammadZuhairKhan. I took the title in the literal way.. good one though
– Rai
17 hours ago
1
1
Ha, lol. I should havs got that. Well done
– Hugh
2 days ago
Ha, lol. I should havs got that. Well done
– Hugh
2 days ago
1
1
Ummm... It was actually about "How"... A really good conclusion but the fact that the title wasn't allowing me less than 15 characters. I am sorry
– Mohammad Zuhair Khan
2 days ago
Ummm... It was actually about "How"... A really good conclusion but the fact that the title wasn't allowing me less than 15 characters. I am sorry
– Mohammad Zuhair Khan
2 days ago
1
1
"How?" is a question. it implies How about "how"?
– Ahmed Abdelhameed
yesterday
"How?" is a question. it implies How about "how"?
– Ahmed Abdelhameed
yesterday
I get it now @MohammadZuhairKhan. I took the title in the literal way.. good one though
– Rai
17 hours ago
I get it now @MohammadZuhairKhan. I took the title in the literal way.. good one though
– Rai
17 hours ago
add a comment |