“They're using a cell phone” vs. “They're using cell phones”












2














The usage of singular and plural has always been confusing for me.



I often see sentences like these





  1. People are using cell phones.

  2. People are using a cell phone.




Does the first sentence mean everyone has a phone and they are all using their own?
Does the second sentence mean they are sharing one cell phone?



If I see a group of people holding a cell phone in their hand(s), <- even this is confusing for me, should I use the first sentence then?



Another example: you see two men, and both of them are carrying a bag. Which sentence should I say/use?





  1. They are carrying backpacks

  2. They are carrying a backpack




Could you please make it clear for me?










share|improve this question
























  • This is something that native speakers do not do consistently, so don't worry too much about it.
    – phoog
    Jan 22 '16 at 17:20










  • Context helps explain sloppy speech patterns such as these. How many cell phones does each person usually use? Does a crowd generally share one cell phone? How many backpacks would it normally be if you say "they are carrying a backpack"? What if you said "Two men are carrying a sofa"? Careful speech: "Each person is using his or her cell phone." "Everyone is using a cell phone."
    – Steven Littman
    Jan 22 '16 at 18:45










  • "People are using a cellphone" might be used in the context of "I look down the street. People are browsing at the newsstand. People are chatting. People are using a cellphone." In this case it means that some people from the group are using their cellphones.
    – Hot Licks
    Jan 22 '16 at 21:58






  • 2




    Related: Should a noun after the determiner their take in the form of singular or of plural?
    – Mari-Lou A
    Jan 25 '16 at 12:28
















2














The usage of singular and plural has always been confusing for me.



I often see sentences like these





  1. People are using cell phones.

  2. People are using a cell phone.




Does the first sentence mean everyone has a phone and they are all using their own?
Does the second sentence mean they are sharing one cell phone?



If I see a group of people holding a cell phone in their hand(s), <- even this is confusing for me, should I use the first sentence then?



Another example: you see two men, and both of them are carrying a bag. Which sentence should I say/use?





  1. They are carrying backpacks

  2. They are carrying a backpack




Could you please make it clear for me?










share|improve this question
























  • This is something that native speakers do not do consistently, so don't worry too much about it.
    – phoog
    Jan 22 '16 at 17:20










  • Context helps explain sloppy speech patterns such as these. How many cell phones does each person usually use? Does a crowd generally share one cell phone? How many backpacks would it normally be if you say "they are carrying a backpack"? What if you said "Two men are carrying a sofa"? Careful speech: "Each person is using his or her cell phone." "Everyone is using a cell phone."
    – Steven Littman
    Jan 22 '16 at 18:45










  • "People are using a cellphone" might be used in the context of "I look down the street. People are browsing at the newsstand. People are chatting. People are using a cellphone." In this case it means that some people from the group are using their cellphones.
    – Hot Licks
    Jan 22 '16 at 21:58






  • 2




    Related: Should a noun after the determiner their take in the form of singular or of plural?
    – Mari-Lou A
    Jan 25 '16 at 12:28














2












2








2


1





The usage of singular and plural has always been confusing for me.



I often see sentences like these





  1. People are using cell phones.

  2. People are using a cell phone.




Does the first sentence mean everyone has a phone and they are all using their own?
Does the second sentence mean they are sharing one cell phone?



If I see a group of people holding a cell phone in their hand(s), <- even this is confusing for me, should I use the first sentence then?



Another example: you see two men, and both of them are carrying a bag. Which sentence should I say/use?





  1. They are carrying backpacks

  2. They are carrying a backpack




Could you please make it clear for me?










share|improve this question















The usage of singular and plural has always been confusing for me.



I often see sentences like these





  1. People are using cell phones.

  2. People are using a cell phone.




Does the first sentence mean everyone has a phone and they are all using their own?
Does the second sentence mean they are sharing one cell phone?



If I see a group of people holding a cell phone in their hand(s), <- even this is confusing for me, should I use the first sentence then?



Another example: you see two men, and both of them are carrying a bag. Which sentence should I say/use?





  1. They are carrying backpacks

  2. They are carrying a backpack




Could you please make it clear for me?







grammatical-number singular-they






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jan 25 '16 at 9:45









Mari-Lou A

61.8k55218456




61.8k55218456










asked Jan 22 '16 at 15:08









Nayana

867




867












  • This is something that native speakers do not do consistently, so don't worry too much about it.
    – phoog
    Jan 22 '16 at 17:20










  • Context helps explain sloppy speech patterns such as these. How many cell phones does each person usually use? Does a crowd generally share one cell phone? How many backpacks would it normally be if you say "they are carrying a backpack"? What if you said "Two men are carrying a sofa"? Careful speech: "Each person is using his or her cell phone." "Everyone is using a cell phone."
    – Steven Littman
    Jan 22 '16 at 18:45










  • "People are using a cellphone" might be used in the context of "I look down the street. People are browsing at the newsstand. People are chatting. People are using a cellphone." In this case it means that some people from the group are using their cellphones.
    – Hot Licks
    Jan 22 '16 at 21:58






  • 2




    Related: Should a noun after the determiner their take in the form of singular or of plural?
    – Mari-Lou A
    Jan 25 '16 at 12:28


















  • This is something that native speakers do not do consistently, so don't worry too much about it.
    – phoog
    Jan 22 '16 at 17:20










  • Context helps explain sloppy speech patterns such as these. How many cell phones does each person usually use? Does a crowd generally share one cell phone? How many backpacks would it normally be if you say "they are carrying a backpack"? What if you said "Two men are carrying a sofa"? Careful speech: "Each person is using his or her cell phone." "Everyone is using a cell phone."
    – Steven Littman
    Jan 22 '16 at 18:45










  • "People are using a cellphone" might be used in the context of "I look down the street. People are browsing at the newsstand. People are chatting. People are using a cellphone." In this case it means that some people from the group are using their cellphones.
    – Hot Licks
    Jan 22 '16 at 21:58






  • 2




    Related: Should a noun after the determiner their take in the form of singular or of plural?
    – Mari-Lou A
    Jan 25 '16 at 12:28
















This is something that native speakers do not do consistently, so don't worry too much about it.
– phoog
Jan 22 '16 at 17:20




This is something that native speakers do not do consistently, so don't worry too much about it.
– phoog
Jan 22 '16 at 17:20












Context helps explain sloppy speech patterns such as these. How many cell phones does each person usually use? Does a crowd generally share one cell phone? How many backpacks would it normally be if you say "they are carrying a backpack"? What if you said "Two men are carrying a sofa"? Careful speech: "Each person is using his or her cell phone." "Everyone is using a cell phone."
– Steven Littman
Jan 22 '16 at 18:45




Context helps explain sloppy speech patterns such as these. How many cell phones does each person usually use? Does a crowd generally share one cell phone? How many backpacks would it normally be if you say "they are carrying a backpack"? What if you said "Two men are carrying a sofa"? Careful speech: "Each person is using his or her cell phone." "Everyone is using a cell phone."
– Steven Littman
Jan 22 '16 at 18:45












"People are using a cellphone" might be used in the context of "I look down the street. People are browsing at the newsstand. People are chatting. People are using a cellphone." In this case it means that some people from the group are using their cellphones.
– Hot Licks
Jan 22 '16 at 21:58




"People are using a cellphone" might be used in the context of "I look down the street. People are browsing at the newsstand. People are chatting. People are using a cellphone." In this case it means that some people from the group are using their cellphones.
– Hot Licks
Jan 22 '16 at 21:58




2




2




Related: Should a noun after the determiner their take in the form of singular or of plural?
– Mari-Lou A
Jan 25 '16 at 12:28




Related: Should a noun after the determiner their take in the form of singular or of plural?
– Mari-Lou A
Jan 25 '16 at 12:28










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















11





+50









This aspect of grammar is called the distributive plural. Swan in Practical English Usage (p530) has the following discussion:




Singular and plural: distributive plural



1. people doing the same thing



To talk about several people doing the same thing, English usually
prefers a plural noun for a repeated idea.




  • Tell the kids to bring raincoats to school tomorrow.


  • (More natural than Tell the kids to bring a raincoat ...)



Plural forms are almost always used in this case if there are
possessives.





  • Tell the children to blow their noses. (not ... to blow their nose.)


  • Six people lost their lives in the accident.




Quirk et al. in A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language (p768) list two similar examples:





  • Have you all brought your cameras? [Each has a camera.]


  • Hand in your papers next Monday. [Each has to hand in one paper.]





and agree with Swan that "... the distributive plural is the norm ...".



But the CGEL goes on to state that:




... the distributive singular may also be used to focus on individual
instances. We therefore often have a number choice.




  • Some children have understanding fathers / an understanding father.


  • We all have good appetites / a good appetite.





The CGEL concludes its discussion as follows:




The singular is sometimes used to avoid ambiguity:




  • Students were asked to name their favorite sport.


The singular makes it clear that only one sport was to be named. Similarly:




  • Children must be accompanied by a parent.




Turning to the OP's example, the speaker has a 'number choice'. While, according to Swan and Quirk, the plural is the more usual form (People are using cell phones), the singular (People are using a cell phone) can also be used 'to focus on individual instances'.



As for the recipient of the message, their world-knowledge will most likely lead them to interpret both sentences identically, namely that each person is using his or her own single phone. People don't usually use more than one phone at a time, and people even less usually jointly and simultaneously use a single phone.



The same reasoning applies to the backpack example. Our experience of the world tells us that people almost always carry a single backpack and almost never share the carrying of a single backpack.



It is incumbent, therefore, on the maker of the message to anticipate when our real-world experience may lead us to the wrong interpretation or when the message is inherently ambiguous and a correct interpretation is important. In both such cases, the message needs to be phrased in such a way as to be clear to the recipient how many of the items are involved for each of the people.



For example:





  • Two people and one backpack: They are carrying a backpack between
    them
    .


  • People, all using more than one phone: People are using each of their
    phones
    .








share|improve this answer





















  • Your explanation was amazing! Thanks! I think I get the idea.
    – Nayana
    Jan 28 '16 at 15:34



















2














The original post includes 5 inter-related questions and 2 split examples... Making this tricky usage very hard to solve with examples.



So here is a principle: "If the occurrence described is generalized, then the plurality of objects is also generalized."



Here is an example of a specific description:
"Right now people in the next room are using a phone."



Since the description is specific to 1 occurrence, the plural "people" and singular "phone" should be treated literally.
There is 1 occurrence of multiple people using 1 phone.



Here is an example of a general description:
"Once you needed a computer to go online, but now people are using cell phones."



Since the situation is generalized the details involved are also generalized.
The speaker references both plural "people" and plural "cell phones" emphasizing the fact that this description is not specific. They don't care about the exact relationship between number of people and number of phones.



For reading and listening to English watch for "specific or general" indicators. Not everyone will use them consistently, but it is common enough to serve as a guideline.



For speaking or writing, make it a goal to use good "specific & literal" or "general and non-literal" indicators:



"I saw 2 men, each carrying a backpack." { specific & literal, each man has a backpack}



"I saw 2 men carrying a backpack." { specific & literal, without a clarifying word like "each" this means they are both holding the same backpack. }



"I have often seen men carrying backpacks" {general & non-literal, there was more than one occasion, there was more than 1 man, there was more than 1 backpack...}






share|improve this answer



















  • 1




    To be fair it's a rambling question... it called to me.
    – H.R.Rambler
    Jan 25 '16 at 18:53






  • 1




    You should add the example "I saw two men carrying a backpack" and explain what its literal meaning would be. Then it's +1 from me.
    – Mari-Lou A
    Jan 25 '16 at 19:15



















0














So, this is difficult.



Imagine you are reading a recounting of a historical event.



"The Romans are armed with a short sword known as a gladius which they use to great effect."



Obviously the Roman army has more than one sword but we are using the singular of Gladius here. But there is no way to be certain if that other than context.



I would recommend avoiding phrasing like this and using context to decipher it when you come across it. It is grammatically correct however.






share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    The reason "a short sword known as a Gladius" is singular is because it is identifying a particular type of sword. If you just wanted to say that the Romans are armed with swords, as opposed to, say, spears, you'd have to use the plural.
    – phoog
    Jan 22 '16 at 17:22










  • Yes, that was what I was missing as far as explain the context. But if I say "the imperials are armed with a super weapon known as a death star which they use to great effect." I have not changed anything grammatically but you are still not getting precise information on how many death stars they have
    – user156476
    Jan 22 '16 at 17:27










  • I doubt there would be need of a plural form. One Death Star should do the trick.
    – Steven Littman
    Jan 22 '16 at 18:42










  • Yes, that's what they thought initially as well..
    – user156476
    Jan 22 '16 at 18:43











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f301625%2ftheyre-using-a-cell-phone-vs-theyre-using-cell-phones%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









11





+50









This aspect of grammar is called the distributive plural. Swan in Practical English Usage (p530) has the following discussion:




Singular and plural: distributive plural



1. people doing the same thing



To talk about several people doing the same thing, English usually
prefers a plural noun for a repeated idea.




  • Tell the kids to bring raincoats to school tomorrow.


  • (More natural than Tell the kids to bring a raincoat ...)



Plural forms are almost always used in this case if there are
possessives.





  • Tell the children to blow their noses. (not ... to blow their nose.)


  • Six people lost their lives in the accident.




Quirk et al. in A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language (p768) list two similar examples:





  • Have you all brought your cameras? [Each has a camera.]


  • Hand in your papers next Monday. [Each has to hand in one paper.]





and agree with Swan that "... the distributive plural is the norm ...".



But the CGEL goes on to state that:




... the distributive singular may also be used to focus on individual
instances. We therefore often have a number choice.




  • Some children have understanding fathers / an understanding father.


  • We all have good appetites / a good appetite.





The CGEL concludes its discussion as follows:




The singular is sometimes used to avoid ambiguity:




  • Students were asked to name their favorite sport.


The singular makes it clear that only one sport was to be named. Similarly:




  • Children must be accompanied by a parent.




Turning to the OP's example, the speaker has a 'number choice'. While, according to Swan and Quirk, the plural is the more usual form (People are using cell phones), the singular (People are using a cell phone) can also be used 'to focus on individual instances'.



As for the recipient of the message, their world-knowledge will most likely lead them to interpret both sentences identically, namely that each person is using his or her own single phone. People don't usually use more than one phone at a time, and people even less usually jointly and simultaneously use a single phone.



The same reasoning applies to the backpack example. Our experience of the world tells us that people almost always carry a single backpack and almost never share the carrying of a single backpack.



It is incumbent, therefore, on the maker of the message to anticipate when our real-world experience may lead us to the wrong interpretation or when the message is inherently ambiguous and a correct interpretation is important. In both such cases, the message needs to be phrased in such a way as to be clear to the recipient how many of the items are involved for each of the people.



For example:





  • Two people and one backpack: They are carrying a backpack between
    them
    .


  • People, all using more than one phone: People are using each of their
    phones
    .








share|improve this answer





















  • Your explanation was amazing! Thanks! I think I get the idea.
    – Nayana
    Jan 28 '16 at 15:34
















11





+50









This aspect of grammar is called the distributive plural. Swan in Practical English Usage (p530) has the following discussion:




Singular and plural: distributive plural



1. people doing the same thing



To talk about several people doing the same thing, English usually
prefers a plural noun for a repeated idea.




  • Tell the kids to bring raincoats to school tomorrow.


  • (More natural than Tell the kids to bring a raincoat ...)



Plural forms are almost always used in this case if there are
possessives.





  • Tell the children to blow their noses. (not ... to blow their nose.)


  • Six people lost their lives in the accident.




Quirk et al. in A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language (p768) list two similar examples:





  • Have you all brought your cameras? [Each has a camera.]


  • Hand in your papers next Monday. [Each has to hand in one paper.]





and agree with Swan that "... the distributive plural is the norm ...".



But the CGEL goes on to state that:




... the distributive singular may also be used to focus on individual
instances. We therefore often have a number choice.




  • Some children have understanding fathers / an understanding father.


  • We all have good appetites / a good appetite.





The CGEL concludes its discussion as follows:




The singular is sometimes used to avoid ambiguity:




  • Students were asked to name their favorite sport.


The singular makes it clear that only one sport was to be named. Similarly:




  • Children must be accompanied by a parent.




Turning to the OP's example, the speaker has a 'number choice'. While, according to Swan and Quirk, the plural is the more usual form (People are using cell phones), the singular (People are using a cell phone) can also be used 'to focus on individual instances'.



As for the recipient of the message, their world-knowledge will most likely lead them to interpret both sentences identically, namely that each person is using his or her own single phone. People don't usually use more than one phone at a time, and people even less usually jointly and simultaneously use a single phone.



The same reasoning applies to the backpack example. Our experience of the world tells us that people almost always carry a single backpack and almost never share the carrying of a single backpack.



It is incumbent, therefore, on the maker of the message to anticipate when our real-world experience may lead us to the wrong interpretation or when the message is inherently ambiguous and a correct interpretation is important. In both such cases, the message needs to be phrased in such a way as to be clear to the recipient how many of the items are involved for each of the people.



For example:





  • Two people and one backpack: They are carrying a backpack between
    them
    .


  • People, all using more than one phone: People are using each of their
    phones
    .








share|improve this answer





















  • Your explanation was amazing! Thanks! I think I get the idea.
    – Nayana
    Jan 28 '16 at 15:34














11





+50







11





+50



11




+50




This aspect of grammar is called the distributive plural. Swan in Practical English Usage (p530) has the following discussion:




Singular and plural: distributive plural



1. people doing the same thing



To talk about several people doing the same thing, English usually
prefers a plural noun for a repeated idea.




  • Tell the kids to bring raincoats to school tomorrow.


  • (More natural than Tell the kids to bring a raincoat ...)



Plural forms are almost always used in this case if there are
possessives.





  • Tell the children to blow their noses. (not ... to blow their nose.)


  • Six people lost their lives in the accident.




Quirk et al. in A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language (p768) list two similar examples:





  • Have you all brought your cameras? [Each has a camera.]


  • Hand in your papers next Monday. [Each has to hand in one paper.]





and agree with Swan that "... the distributive plural is the norm ...".



But the CGEL goes on to state that:




... the distributive singular may also be used to focus on individual
instances. We therefore often have a number choice.




  • Some children have understanding fathers / an understanding father.


  • We all have good appetites / a good appetite.





The CGEL concludes its discussion as follows:




The singular is sometimes used to avoid ambiguity:




  • Students were asked to name their favorite sport.


The singular makes it clear that only one sport was to be named. Similarly:




  • Children must be accompanied by a parent.




Turning to the OP's example, the speaker has a 'number choice'. While, according to Swan and Quirk, the plural is the more usual form (People are using cell phones), the singular (People are using a cell phone) can also be used 'to focus on individual instances'.



As for the recipient of the message, their world-knowledge will most likely lead them to interpret both sentences identically, namely that each person is using his or her own single phone. People don't usually use more than one phone at a time, and people even less usually jointly and simultaneously use a single phone.



The same reasoning applies to the backpack example. Our experience of the world tells us that people almost always carry a single backpack and almost never share the carrying of a single backpack.



It is incumbent, therefore, on the maker of the message to anticipate when our real-world experience may lead us to the wrong interpretation or when the message is inherently ambiguous and a correct interpretation is important. In both such cases, the message needs to be phrased in such a way as to be clear to the recipient how many of the items are involved for each of the people.



For example:





  • Two people and one backpack: They are carrying a backpack between
    them
    .


  • People, all using more than one phone: People are using each of their
    phones
    .








share|improve this answer












This aspect of grammar is called the distributive plural. Swan in Practical English Usage (p530) has the following discussion:




Singular and plural: distributive plural



1. people doing the same thing



To talk about several people doing the same thing, English usually
prefers a plural noun for a repeated idea.




  • Tell the kids to bring raincoats to school tomorrow.


  • (More natural than Tell the kids to bring a raincoat ...)



Plural forms are almost always used in this case if there are
possessives.





  • Tell the children to blow their noses. (not ... to blow their nose.)


  • Six people lost their lives in the accident.




Quirk et al. in A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language (p768) list two similar examples:





  • Have you all brought your cameras? [Each has a camera.]


  • Hand in your papers next Monday. [Each has to hand in one paper.]





and agree with Swan that "... the distributive plural is the norm ...".



But the CGEL goes on to state that:




... the distributive singular may also be used to focus on individual
instances. We therefore often have a number choice.




  • Some children have understanding fathers / an understanding father.


  • We all have good appetites / a good appetite.





The CGEL concludes its discussion as follows:




The singular is sometimes used to avoid ambiguity:




  • Students were asked to name their favorite sport.


The singular makes it clear that only one sport was to be named. Similarly:




  • Children must be accompanied by a parent.




Turning to the OP's example, the speaker has a 'number choice'. While, according to Swan and Quirk, the plural is the more usual form (People are using cell phones), the singular (People are using a cell phone) can also be used 'to focus on individual instances'.



As for the recipient of the message, their world-knowledge will most likely lead them to interpret both sentences identically, namely that each person is using his or her own single phone. People don't usually use more than one phone at a time, and people even less usually jointly and simultaneously use a single phone.



The same reasoning applies to the backpack example. Our experience of the world tells us that people almost always carry a single backpack and almost never share the carrying of a single backpack.



It is incumbent, therefore, on the maker of the message to anticipate when our real-world experience may lead us to the wrong interpretation or when the message is inherently ambiguous and a correct interpretation is important. In both such cases, the message needs to be phrased in such a way as to be clear to the recipient how many of the items are involved for each of the people.



For example:





  • Two people and one backpack: They are carrying a backpack between
    them
    .


  • People, all using more than one phone: People are using each of their
    phones
    .









share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Jan 26 '16 at 19:13









Shoe

25k43684




25k43684












  • Your explanation was amazing! Thanks! I think I get the idea.
    – Nayana
    Jan 28 '16 at 15:34


















  • Your explanation was amazing! Thanks! I think I get the idea.
    – Nayana
    Jan 28 '16 at 15:34
















Your explanation was amazing! Thanks! I think I get the idea.
– Nayana
Jan 28 '16 at 15:34




Your explanation was amazing! Thanks! I think I get the idea.
– Nayana
Jan 28 '16 at 15:34













2














The original post includes 5 inter-related questions and 2 split examples... Making this tricky usage very hard to solve with examples.



So here is a principle: "If the occurrence described is generalized, then the plurality of objects is also generalized."



Here is an example of a specific description:
"Right now people in the next room are using a phone."



Since the description is specific to 1 occurrence, the plural "people" and singular "phone" should be treated literally.
There is 1 occurrence of multiple people using 1 phone.



Here is an example of a general description:
"Once you needed a computer to go online, but now people are using cell phones."



Since the situation is generalized the details involved are also generalized.
The speaker references both plural "people" and plural "cell phones" emphasizing the fact that this description is not specific. They don't care about the exact relationship between number of people and number of phones.



For reading and listening to English watch for "specific or general" indicators. Not everyone will use them consistently, but it is common enough to serve as a guideline.



For speaking or writing, make it a goal to use good "specific & literal" or "general and non-literal" indicators:



"I saw 2 men, each carrying a backpack." { specific & literal, each man has a backpack}



"I saw 2 men carrying a backpack." { specific & literal, without a clarifying word like "each" this means they are both holding the same backpack. }



"I have often seen men carrying backpacks" {general & non-literal, there was more than one occasion, there was more than 1 man, there was more than 1 backpack...}






share|improve this answer



















  • 1




    To be fair it's a rambling question... it called to me.
    – H.R.Rambler
    Jan 25 '16 at 18:53






  • 1




    You should add the example "I saw two men carrying a backpack" and explain what its literal meaning would be. Then it's +1 from me.
    – Mari-Lou A
    Jan 25 '16 at 19:15
















2














The original post includes 5 inter-related questions and 2 split examples... Making this tricky usage very hard to solve with examples.



So here is a principle: "If the occurrence described is generalized, then the plurality of objects is also generalized."



Here is an example of a specific description:
"Right now people in the next room are using a phone."



Since the description is specific to 1 occurrence, the plural "people" and singular "phone" should be treated literally.
There is 1 occurrence of multiple people using 1 phone.



Here is an example of a general description:
"Once you needed a computer to go online, but now people are using cell phones."



Since the situation is generalized the details involved are also generalized.
The speaker references both plural "people" and plural "cell phones" emphasizing the fact that this description is not specific. They don't care about the exact relationship between number of people and number of phones.



For reading and listening to English watch for "specific or general" indicators. Not everyone will use them consistently, but it is common enough to serve as a guideline.



For speaking or writing, make it a goal to use good "specific & literal" or "general and non-literal" indicators:



"I saw 2 men, each carrying a backpack." { specific & literal, each man has a backpack}



"I saw 2 men carrying a backpack." { specific & literal, without a clarifying word like "each" this means they are both holding the same backpack. }



"I have often seen men carrying backpacks" {general & non-literal, there was more than one occasion, there was more than 1 man, there was more than 1 backpack...}






share|improve this answer



















  • 1




    To be fair it's a rambling question... it called to me.
    – H.R.Rambler
    Jan 25 '16 at 18:53






  • 1




    You should add the example "I saw two men carrying a backpack" and explain what its literal meaning would be. Then it's +1 from me.
    – Mari-Lou A
    Jan 25 '16 at 19:15














2












2








2






The original post includes 5 inter-related questions and 2 split examples... Making this tricky usage very hard to solve with examples.



So here is a principle: "If the occurrence described is generalized, then the plurality of objects is also generalized."



Here is an example of a specific description:
"Right now people in the next room are using a phone."



Since the description is specific to 1 occurrence, the plural "people" and singular "phone" should be treated literally.
There is 1 occurrence of multiple people using 1 phone.



Here is an example of a general description:
"Once you needed a computer to go online, but now people are using cell phones."



Since the situation is generalized the details involved are also generalized.
The speaker references both plural "people" and plural "cell phones" emphasizing the fact that this description is not specific. They don't care about the exact relationship between number of people and number of phones.



For reading and listening to English watch for "specific or general" indicators. Not everyone will use them consistently, but it is common enough to serve as a guideline.



For speaking or writing, make it a goal to use good "specific & literal" or "general and non-literal" indicators:



"I saw 2 men, each carrying a backpack." { specific & literal, each man has a backpack}



"I saw 2 men carrying a backpack." { specific & literal, without a clarifying word like "each" this means they are both holding the same backpack. }



"I have often seen men carrying backpacks" {general & non-literal, there was more than one occasion, there was more than 1 man, there was more than 1 backpack...}






share|improve this answer














The original post includes 5 inter-related questions and 2 split examples... Making this tricky usage very hard to solve with examples.



So here is a principle: "If the occurrence described is generalized, then the plurality of objects is also generalized."



Here is an example of a specific description:
"Right now people in the next room are using a phone."



Since the description is specific to 1 occurrence, the plural "people" and singular "phone" should be treated literally.
There is 1 occurrence of multiple people using 1 phone.



Here is an example of a general description:
"Once you needed a computer to go online, but now people are using cell phones."



Since the situation is generalized the details involved are also generalized.
The speaker references both plural "people" and plural "cell phones" emphasizing the fact that this description is not specific. They don't care about the exact relationship between number of people and number of phones.



For reading and listening to English watch for "specific or general" indicators. Not everyone will use them consistently, but it is common enough to serve as a guideline.



For speaking or writing, make it a goal to use good "specific & literal" or "general and non-literal" indicators:



"I saw 2 men, each carrying a backpack." { specific & literal, each man has a backpack}



"I saw 2 men carrying a backpack." { specific & literal, without a clarifying word like "each" this means they are both holding the same backpack. }



"I have often seen men carrying backpacks" {general & non-literal, there was more than one occasion, there was more than 1 man, there was more than 1 backpack...}







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Jan 25 '16 at 20:00

























answered Jan 22 '16 at 21:42









H.R.Rambler

1,480410




1,480410








  • 1




    To be fair it's a rambling question... it called to me.
    – H.R.Rambler
    Jan 25 '16 at 18:53






  • 1




    You should add the example "I saw two men carrying a backpack" and explain what its literal meaning would be. Then it's +1 from me.
    – Mari-Lou A
    Jan 25 '16 at 19:15














  • 1




    To be fair it's a rambling question... it called to me.
    – H.R.Rambler
    Jan 25 '16 at 18:53






  • 1




    You should add the example "I saw two men carrying a backpack" and explain what its literal meaning would be. Then it's +1 from me.
    – Mari-Lou A
    Jan 25 '16 at 19:15








1




1




To be fair it's a rambling question... it called to me.
– H.R.Rambler
Jan 25 '16 at 18:53




To be fair it's a rambling question... it called to me.
– H.R.Rambler
Jan 25 '16 at 18:53




1




1




You should add the example "I saw two men carrying a backpack" and explain what its literal meaning would be. Then it's +1 from me.
– Mari-Lou A
Jan 25 '16 at 19:15




You should add the example "I saw two men carrying a backpack" and explain what its literal meaning would be. Then it's +1 from me.
– Mari-Lou A
Jan 25 '16 at 19:15











0














So, this is difficult.



Imagine you are reading a recounting of a historical event.



"The Romans are armed with a short sword known as a gladius which they use to great effect."



Obviously the Roman army has more than one sword but we are using the singular of Gladius here. But there is no way to be certain if that other than context.



I would recommend avoiding phrasing like this and using context to decipher it when you come across it. It is grammatically correct however.






share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    The reason "a short sword known as a Gladius" is singular is because it is identifying a particular type of sword. If you just wanted to say that the Romans are armed with swords, as opposed to, say, spears, you'd have to use the plural.
    – phoog
    Jan 22 '16 at 17:22










  • Yes, that was what I was missing as far as explain the context. But if I say "the imperials are armed with a super weapon known as a death star which they use to great effect." I have not changed anything grammatically but you are still not getting precise information on how many death stars they have
    – user156476
    Jan 22 '16 at 17:27










  • I doubt there would be need of a plural form. One Death Star should do the trick.
    – Steven Littman
    Jan 22 '16 at 18:42










  • Yes, that's what they thought initially as well..
    – user156476
    Jan 22 '16 at 18:43
















0














So, this is difficult.



Imagine you are reading a recounting of a historical event.



"The Romans are armed with a short sword known as a gladius which they use to great effect."



Obviously the Roman army has more than one sword but we are using the singular of Gladius here. But there is no way to be certain if that other than context.



I would recommend avoiding phrasing like this and using context to decipher it when you come across it. It is grammatically correct however.






share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    The reason "a short sword known as a Gladius" is singular is because it is identifying a particular type of sword. If you just wanted to say that the Romans are armed with swords, as opposed to, say, spears, you'd have to use the plural.
    – phoog
    Jan 22 '16 at 17:22










  • Yes, that was what I was missing as far as explain the context. But if I say "the imperials are armed with a super weapon known as a death star which they use to great effect." I have not changed anything grammatically but you are still not getting precise information on how many death stars they have
    – user156476
    Jan 22 '16 at 17:27










  • I doubt there would be need of a plural form. One Death Star should do the trick.
    – Steven Littman
    Jan 22 '16 at 18:42










  • Yes, that's what they thought initially as well..
    – user156476
    Jan 22 '16 at 18:43














0












0








0






So, this is difficult.



Imagine you are reading a recounting of a historical event.



"The Romans are armed with a short sword known as a gladius which they use to great effect."



Obviously the Roman army has more than one sword but we are using the singular of Gladius here. But there is no way to be certain if that other than context.



I would recommend avoiding phrasing like this and using context to decipher it when you come across it. It is grammatically correct however.






share|improve this answer












So, this is difficult.



Imagine you are reading a recounting of a historical event.



"The Romans are armed with a short sword known as a gladius which they use to great effect."



Obviously the Roman army has more than one sword but we are using the singular of Gladius here. But there is no way to be certain if that other than context.



I would recommend avoiding phrasing like this and using context to decipher it when you come across it. It is grammatically correct however.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Jan 22 '16 at 16:49









user156476

241




241








  • 1




    The reason "a short sword known as a Gladius" is singular is because it is identifying a particular type of sword. If you just wanted to say that the Romans are armed with swords, as opposed to, say, spears, you'd have to use the plural.
    – phoog
    Jan 22 '16 at 17:22










  • Yes, that was what I was missing as far as explain the context. But if I say "the imperials are armed with a super weapon known as a death star which they use to great effect." I have not changed anything grammatically but you are still not getting precise information on how many death stars they have
    – user156476
    Jan 22 '16 at 17:27










  • I doubt there would be need of a plural form. One Death Star should do the trick.
    – Steven Littman
    Jan 22 '16 at 18:42










  • Yes, that's what they thought initially as well..
    – user156476
    Jan 22 '16 at 18:43














  • 1




    The reason "a short sword known as a Gladius" is singular is because it is identifying a particular type of sword. If you just wanted to say that the Romans are armed with swords, as opposed to, say, spears, you'd have to use the plural.
    – phoog
    Jan 22 '16 at 17:22










  • Yes, that was what I was missing as far as explain the context. But if I say "the imperials are armed with a super weapon known as a death star which they use to great effect." I have not changed anything grammatically but you are still not getting precise information on how many death stars they have
    – user156476
    Jan 22 '16 at 17:27










  • I doubt there would be need of a plural form. One Death Star should do the trick.
    – Steven Littman
    Jan 22 '16 at 18:42










  • Yes, that's what they thought initially as well..
    – user156476
    Jan 22 '16 at 18:43








1




1




The reason "a short sword known as a Gladius" is singular is because it is identifying a particular type of sword. If you just wanted to say that the Romans are armed with swords, as opposed to, say, spears, you'd have to use the plural.
– phoog
Jan 22 '16 at 17:22




The reason "a short sword known as a Gladius" is singular is because it is identifying a particular type of sword. If you just wanted to say that the Romans are armed with swords, as opposed to, say, spears, you'd have to use the plural.
– phoog
Jan 22 '16 at 17:22












Yes, that was what I was missing as far as explain the context. But if I say "the imperials are armed with a super weapon known as a death star which they use to great effect." I have not changed anything grammatically but you are still not getting precise information on how many death stars they have
– user156476
Jan 22 '16 at 17:27




Yes, that was what I was missing as far as explain the context. But if I say "the imperials are armed with a super weapon known as a death star which they use to great effect." I have not changed anything grammatically but you are still not getting precise information on how many death stars they have
– user156476
Jan 22 '16 at 17:27












I doubt there would be need of a plural form. One Death Star should do the trick.
– Steven Littman
Jan 22 '16 at 18:42




I doubt there would be need of a plural form. One Death Star should do the trick.
– Steven Littman
Jan 22 '16 at 18:42












Yes, that's what they thought initially as well..
– user156476
Jan 22 '16 at 18:43




Yes, that's what they thought initially as well..
– user156476
Jan 22 '16 at 18:43


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f301625%2ftheyre-using-a-cell-phone-vs-theyre-using-cell-phones%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

"Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

Alcedinidae

Origin of the phrase “under your belt”?