Confirm the sentence [on hold]












0















Is this sentence correct from grammar point view



“would not be not confidently without your great support”






grammar







share|improve this question









New contributor




user334050 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











put on hold as off-topic by tchrist♦ yesterday


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Proofreading questions are off-topic unless a specific source of concern in the text is clearly identified." – tchrist

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

















  • Please confirm the sentence

    – user334050
    yesterday











  • It is neither grammatical nor a sentence. It also doesn’t make any sense.

    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    yesterday
















0















Is this sentence correct from grammar point view



“would not be not confidently without your great support”






grammar







share|improve this question









New contributor




user334050 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











put on hold as off-topic by tchrist♦ yesterday


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Proofreading questions are off-topic unless a specific source of concern in the text is clearly identified." – tchrist

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

















  • Please confirm the sentence

    – user334050
    yesterday











  • It is neither grammatical nor a sentence. It also doesn’t make any sense.

    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    yesterday














0












0








0








Is this sentence correct from grammar point view



“would not be not confidently without your great support”






grammar







share|improve this question









New contributor




user334050 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












Is this sentence correct from grammar point view



“would not be not confidently without your great support”






grammar




grammar






share|improve this question









New contributor




user334050 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




user334050 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday







user334050













New contributor




user334050 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked yesterday









user334050user334050

13




13




New contributor




user334050 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





user334050 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






user334050 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




put on hold as off-topic by tchrist♦ yesterday


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Proofreading questions are off-topic unless a specific source of concern in the text is clearly identified." – tchrist

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







put on hold as off-topic by tchrist♦ yesterday


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Proofreading questions are off-topic unless a specific source of concern in the text is clearly identified." – tchrist

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • Please confirm the sentence

    – user334050
    yesterday











  • It is neither grammatical nor a sentence. It also doesn’t make any sense.

    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    yesterday



















  • Please confirm the sentence

    – user334050
    yesterday











  • It is neither grammatical nor a sentence. It also doesn’t make any sense.

    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    yesterday

















Please confirm the sentence

– user334050
yesterday





Please confirm the sentence

– user334050
yesterday













It is neither grammatical nor a sentence. It also doesn’t make any sense.

– Janus Bahs Jacquet
yesterday





It is neither grammatical nor a sentence. It also doesn’t make any sense.

– Janus Bahs Jacquet
yesterday










0






active

oldest

votes

















0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes

-

Popular posts from this blog

"Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

Image
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box; } 2 total noob sorry any help greatly appreciated. I keep getting this "Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'." heres my codes code one CREATE TABLE supplier ( supplierID INT PRIMARY KEY, ISBN INT FOREIGN KEY REFERENCES book(ISBN), price DECIMAL (5,2), ON UPDATE CASCADE, ON DELETE CASCADE, ); code two CREATE TABLE orders ( orderID INT PRIMARY KEY, customerID INT FOREIGN KEY REFERENCES customer(customerID), ISBN INT FOREIGN KEY REFERENCES book(ISBN), orderDate date, ON UPDATE CASCADE, ON DELETE CASCADE, ); Ive run out of stuff to try other than dumbing it down to uselessness. ...
Read more

Alcedinidae

Image
Alcedinidae Martin-pêcheur à dos bleu ( Alcedo azurea ) Classification (COI) Règne Animalia Embranchement Chordata Sous-embr. Vertebrata Classe Aves Ordre Coraciiformes Famille Alcedinidae Rafinesque, 1815 Les Alcédinidés ou Alcedinidae forment une famille d'oiseaux plus connus sous les noms de martins-pêcheurs et martins-chasseurs. Sommaire 1 Description 2 Répartition et habitat 3 Systématique 3.1 Liste alphabétique des genres 3.2 Liste des espèces 4 Chez les Anciens : l'alcyon 4.1 Étymologie (Littré) 4.2 Oiseau « fabuleux » ? 5 Notes 6 Articles connexes 7 Liens externes 7.1 Bibliographie Description | Ce sont des oiseaux compacts de taille petite à moyenne (10 à 46 cm), au bec droit et long, en forme de poignard. Leurs pattes sont courtes, et ils portent un plumage aux couleurs vives. Répartition et habitat | Cosmopolites, ils fréquentent surtout ...
Read more

Origin of the phrase “under your belt”?

Image
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0; } 17 1 Today, I found myself discussing what students should have "under their belts" during a lecture, and I wondered to myself if there was some inappropriate undertone here that I might be unaware of. Question : What is the origin of the phrase "under your belt"? A google search revealed some webpages (e.g. [1]) that assert its origin is related to consumption of food -- once a meal has been eaten, it's under your belt (which is a relief). However, with such websites, I have no way to determine fact from "random guy on the internet making stuff up". etymology idioms ...
Read more