Gap between infill and walls for one filament only












2












$begingroup$


When I'm printing with my Chromatik filament white, 1.75 mm in diameter, I observe a gap between the infill and the walls (see picture).



Everywhere on the web I can find explanations for this kind of problem (apparently it's the symptom of loose belts), but I have this problem for this filament only. I have the filaments Chromatik electric blue and Octofiber black and I don't have this issue with them. I tried to increase the temperature by ~10 °C, but it didn't have much effect.



Have you ever seen that guys? I repeat, it's with this filament only.



Print showing infill and wall not touching










share|improve this question









New contributor




JPFrancoia is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$

















    2












    $begingroup$


    When I'm printing with my Chromatik filament white, 1.75 mm in diameter, I observe a gap between the infill and the walls (see picture).



    Everywhere on the web I can find explanations for this kind of problem (apparently it's the symptom of loose belts), but I have this problem for this filament only. I have the filaments Chromatik electric blue and Octofiber black and I don't have this issue with them. I tried to increase the temperature by ~10 °C, but it didn't have much effect.



    Have you ever seen that guys? I repeat, it's with this filament only.



    Print showing infill and wall not touching










    share|improve this question









    New contributor




    JPFrancoia is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.







    $endgroup$















      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      When I'm printing with my Chromatik filament white, 1.75 mm in diameter, I observe a gap between the infill and the walls (see picture).



      Everywhere on the web I can find explanations for this kind of problem (apparently it's the symptom of loose belts), but I have this problem for this filament only. I have the filaments Chromatik electric blue and Octofiber black and I don't have this issue with them. I tried to increase the temperature by ~10 °C, but it didn't have much effect.



      Have you ever seen that guys? I repeat, it's with this filament only.



      Print showing infill and wall not touching










      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      JPFrancoia is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.







      $endgroup$




      When I'm printing with my Chromatik filament white, 1.75 mm in diameter, I observe a gap between the infill and the walls (see picture).



      Everywhere on the web I can find explanations for this kind of problem (apparently it's the symptom of loose belts), but I have this problem for this filament only. I have the filaments Chromatik electric blue and Octofiber black and I don't have this issue with them. I tried to increase the temperature by ~10 °C, but it didn't have much effect.



      Have you ever seen that guys? I repeat, it's with this filament only.



      Print showing infill and wall not touching







      filament infill






      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      JPFrancoia is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      JPFrancoia is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 2 days ago









      0scar

      10.3k21345




      10.3k21345






      New contributor




      JPFrancoia is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 2 days ago









      JPFrancoiaJPFrancoia

      1132




      1132




      New contributor




      JPFrancoia is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      JPFrancoia is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      JPFrancoia is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          I have observed similar issues between walls, not necessarily between the infill and the walls.



          It is most likely that the viscosity of this filament is way different (less fluid) than the other filaments you print. Not only mechanical issues (to be precise: inaccurate positioning e.g. caused by loose belts) could play a part in this, but also printing speed. A more viscous filament needs more pressure and time to get the filament through the nozzle. This is exactly what happened in my case, because of different wall speed line settings (inner and outer), the filament did not flow fast enough leading to under extrusion. In your case you probably also have a higher infill than wall speed, so lowering your infill speed may mitigate your problem. Also, most slicers have an option to define the overlap between the infill and the perimeters/walls, you could also increase that for this filament.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            It makes sense. I decreased the inner wall speed (60 to 45 mm/s) and the infill speed (60 to 45). The outer wall speed is still 30 mm/s. Print temperature increased by 5 °C. The issue is totally fixed. I know there shouldn't be any reason to expect it, but still, I'm a bit surprised that for the same brand of filament print settings need to be so different.
            $endgroup$
            – JPFrancoia
            2 days ago











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "640"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });






          JPFrancoia is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2f3dprinting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f7957%2fgap-between-infill-and-walls-for-one-filament-only%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2












          $begingroup$

          I have observed similar issues between walls, not necessarily between the infill and the walls.



          It is most likely that the viscosity of this filament is way different (less fluid) than the other filaments you print. Not only mechanical issues (to be precise: inaccurate positioning e.g. caused by loose belts) could play a part in this, but also printing speed. A more viscous filament needs more pressure and time to get the filament through the nozzle. This is exactly what happened in my case, because of different wall speed line settings (inner and outer), the filament did not flow fast enough leading to under extrusion. In your case you probably also have a higher infill than wall speed, so lowering your infill speed may mitigate your problem. Also, most slicers have an option to define the overlap between the infill and the perimeters/walls, you could also increase that for this filament.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            It makes sense. I decreased the inner wall speed (60 to 45 mm/s) and the infill speed (60 to 45). The outer wall speed is still 30 mm/s. Print temperature increased by 5 °C. The issue is totally fixed. I know there shouldn't be any reason to expect it, but still, I'm a bit surprised that for the same brand of filament print settings need to be so different.
            $endgroup$
            – JPFrancoia
            2 days ago
















          2












          $begingroup$

          I have observed similar issues between walls, not necessarily between the infill and the walls.



          It is most likely that the viscosity of this filament is way different (less fluid) than the other filaments you print. Not only mechanical issues (to be precise: inaccurate positioning e.g. caused by loose belts) could play a part in this, but also printing speed. A more viscous filament needs more pressure and time to get the filament through the nozzle. This is exactly what happened in my case, because of different wall speed line settings (inner and outer), the filament did not flow fast enough leading to under extrusion. In your case you probably also have a higher infill than wall speed, so lowering your infill speed may mitigate your problem. Also, most slicers have an option to define the overlap between the infill and the perimeters/walls, you could also increase that for this filament.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            It makes sense. I decreased the inner wall speed (60 to 45 mm/s) and the infill speed (60 to 45). The outer wall speed is still 30 mm/s. Print temperature increased by 5 °C. The issue is totally fixed. I know there shouldn't be any reason to expect it, but still, I'm a bit surprised that for the same brand of filament print settings need to be so different.
            $endgroup$
            – JPFrancoia
            2 days ago














          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          I have observed similar issues between walls, not necessarily between the infill and the walls.



          It is most likely that the viscosity of this filament is way different (less fluid) than the other filaments you print. Not only mechanical issues (to be precise: inaccurate positioning e.g. caused by loose belts) could play a part in this, but also printing speed. A more viscous filament needs more pressure and time to get the filament through the nozzle. This is exactly what happened in my case, because of different wall speed line settings (inner and outer), the filament did not flow fast enough leading to under extrusion. In your case you probably also have a higher infill than wall speed, so lowering your infill speed may mitigate your problem. Also, most slicers have an option to define the overlap between the infill and the perimeters/walls, you could also increase that for this filament.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          I have observed similar issues between walls, not necessarily between the infill and the walls.



          It is most likely that the viscosity of this filament is way different (less fluid) than the other filaments you print. Not only mechanical issues (to be precise: inaccurate positioning e.g. caused by loose belts) could play a part in this, but also printing speed. A more viscous filament needs more pressure and time to get the filament through the nozzle. This is exactly what happened in my case, because of different wall speed line settings (inner and outer), the filament did not flow fast enough leading to under extrusion. In your case you probably also have a higher infill than wall speed, so lowering your infill speed may mitigate your problem. Also, most slicers have an option to define the overlap between the infill and the perimeters/walls, you could also increase that for this filament.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 2 days ago









          0scar0scar

          10.3k21345




          10.3k21345












          • $begingroup$
            It makes sense. I decreased the inner wall speed (60 to 45 mm/s) and the infill speed (60 to 45). The outer wall speed is still 30 mm/s. Print temperature increased by 5 °C. The issue is totally fixed. I know there shouldn't be any reason to expect it, but still, I'm a bit surprised that for the same brand of filament print settings need to be so different.
            $endgroup$
            – JPFrancoia
            2 days ago


















          • $begingroup$
            It makes sense. I decreased the inner wall speed (60 to 45 mm/s) and the infill speed (60 to 45). The outer wall speed is still 30 mm/s. Print temperature increased by 5 °C. The issue is totally fixed. I know there shouldn't be any reason to expect it, but still, I'm a bit surprised that for the same brand of filament print settings need to be so different.
            $endgroup$
            – JPFrancoia
            2 days ago
















          $begingroup$
          It makes sense. I decreased the inner wall speed (60 to 45 mm/s) and the infill speed (60 to 45). The outer wall speed is still 30 mm/s. Print temperature increased by 5 °C. The issue is totally fixed. I know there shouldn't be any reason to expect it, but still, I'm a bit surprised that for the same brand of filament print settings need to be so different.
          $endgroup$
          – JPFrancoia
          2 days ago




          $begingroup$
          It makes sense. I decreased the inner wall speed (60 to 45 mm/s) and the infill speed (60 to 45). The outer wall speed is still 30 mm/s. Print temperature increased by 5 °C. The issue is totally fixed. I know there shouldn't be any reason to expect it, but still, I'm a bit surprised that for the same brand of filament print settings need to be so different.
          $endgroup$
          – JPFrancoia
          2 days ago










          JPFrancoia is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          JPFrancoia is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













          JPFrancoia is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          JPFrancoia is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















          Thanks for contributing an answer to 3D Printing Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2f3dprinting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f7957%2fgap-between-infill-and-walls-for-one-filament-only%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          "Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

          Alcedinidae

          RAC Tourist Trophy