How to prove the existence and uniqueness of the solution of a second order linear ODE?
$begingroup$
Considering homogeneous, linear, second order differential equation
$$y'' + p(x)y' + q(x)y = r(x), a<x<b$$
$p, q, r$ are given. We already know $y(a) = A, y(b) = B$ and $q(x) < o$. How to prove that this equation has unique solution in $[a,b]$ if it has a solution?
ordinary-differential-equations analysis
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Considering homogeneous, linear, second order differential equation
$$y'' + p(x)y' + q(x)y = r(x), a<x<b$$
$p, q, r$ are given. We already know $y(a) = A, y(b) = B$ and $q(x) < o$. How to prove that this equation has unique solution in $[a,b]$ if it has a solution?
ordinary-differential-equations analysis
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Considering homogeneous, linear, second order differential equation
$$y'' + p(x)y' + q(x)y = r(x), a<x<b$$
$p, q, r$ are given. We already know $y(a) = A, y(b) = B$ and $q(x) < o$. How to prove that this equation has unique solution in $[a,b]$ if it has a solution?
ordinary-differential-equations analysis
$endgroup$
Considering homogeneous, linear, second order differential equation
$$y'' + p(x)y' + q(x)y = r(x), a<x<b$$
$p, q, r$ are given. We already know $y(a) = A, y(b) = B$ and $q(x) < o$. How to prove that this equation has unique solution in $[a,b]$ if it has a solution?
ordinary-differential-equations analysis
ordinary-differential-equations analysis
edited Dec 24 '18 at 13:19
amWhy
1
1
asked Dec 24 '18 at 5:18
X.T ChenX.T Chen
517
517
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Suppose $y_1(x)$ and $y_2(x)$ both satisfy
$y'' + p(x) y' + q(x)y = r(x) tag 1$
with
$y_1(a) = y_2(a) = A, ; y_1(b) = y_2(b) = B; tag 2$
then we have
$y_1'' + p(x) y_1' + q(x)y_1 = r(x) tag 3$
and
$y_2'' + p(x) y_2' + q(x)y_2 = r(x), tag 4$
and, subtracting,
$(y_1 - y_2)'' + p(x) (y_1 - y_2)' + q(x)(y_1 - y_2) = 0, tag 5$
and
$(y_1 - y_2)(a) = y_1(a) - y_2(a) = 0 = y_1(b) - y_2(b) = (y_1 - y_2)(b); tag 6$
setting
$z(x) = y_1(x) - y_2(x), tag 7$
we have
$z'' + p(x) z' + q(x) z = 0, ; z(a) = z(b) = 0; tag 8$
now if $z'(a) = 0$, then by uniqueness of solutions we must have $z(x) = 0$, $x in [a, b]$, since $z(a) = 0$, and thus $y_1(x) = y_2(x)$, and we are done; so we assume $z'(a) ne 0$; in fact, since (8) is linear, we may take $z'(a) > 0$, and thus, by the continuity of $z'(x)$, there is some $delta > 0$ such that
$z'(x) > 0, ; x in [a, a + delta); tag 9$
we then have
$z(x) = z(x) - z(a) = displaystyle int_0^x z'(s) ; ds > 0, x in (a, a + delta); tag{10}$
since $z(x) > 0$ somewhere on $[a, b]$, it must have a positive absolute maximum $x_M in (a, b)$; at such a point
$z'(x_M) = 0, tag{11}$
and thus by (8),
$z''(x_M) = -q(x_M)z(x_M) > 0 tag{12}$
by virtue of the facts that $z(x_M) > 0$, $q(x_M) < 0$; but (12) is impossible at a maximum of $z(x)$, where we must have $z''(x_M) le 0$; this contradiction forces $z'(a) = 0$ and thus also
$z(x) = 0, ; x in [a, b], tag{13}$
and hence
$y_1(x) - y_2(x) = z(x) = 0, ; x in [a, b]; tag{14}$
we conclude the equation (1) with boundary conditions (2) has at most one solution on $[a, b]$.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
why does $z'(a)=0$ lead to $z(x)=0$ and what does "by the uniqueness of solutions" mean?
$endgroup$
– X.T Chen
Dec 24 '18 at 6:17
$begingroup$
@X.TChen: it's the standard result on uniqueness of solutions to ODEs with initial conditions. $z(x) =0$ is the only solution with $z(a) = z'(a) = 0$. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Picard%E2%80%93Lindel%C3%B6f_theorem
$endgroup$
– Robert Lewis
Dec 24 '18 at 6:20
$begingroup$
@X.TChen: "uniqueness of solutions" means there is at most one solution for given initial conditions. So since solutions are unique, we have $z(x) = 0$ if $z(a) = z'(a) = 0$.
$endgroup$
– Robert Lewis
Dec 24 '18 at 6:23
$begingroup$
picard theorem only gives the situation of order one, does it hold for order two? and what is the $z(b)=0$ used for?
$endgroup$
– X.T Chen
Dec 24 '18 at 6:39
$begingroup$
@X.TChen: Picard-Lindeloef extends to all orders. $z(b) = 0$ is what forces a maximum of $z(x)$ to exist; it means that $z(x)$, once positive, must return to $0$ and not just keep growing.
$endgroup$
– Robert Lewis
Dec 24 '18 at 6:44
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3050962%2fhow-to-prove-the-existence-and-uniqueness-of-the-solution-of-a-second-order-line%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Suppose $y_1(x)$ and $y_2(x)$ both satisfy
$y'' + p(x) y' + q(x)y = r(x) tag 1$
with
$y_1(a) = y_2(a) = A, ; y_1(b) = y_2(b) = B; tag 2$
then we have
$y_1'' + p(x) y_1' + q(x)y_1 = r(x) tag 3$
and
$y_2'' + p(x) y_2' + q(x)y_2 = r(x), tag 4$
and, subtracting,
$(y_1 - y_2)'' + p(x) (y_1 - y_2)' + q(x)(y_1 - y_2) = 0, tag 5$
and
$(y_1 - y_2)(a) = y_1(a) - y_2(a) = 0 = y_1(b) - y_2(b) = (y_1 - y_2)(b); tag 6$
setting
$z(x) = y_1(x) - y_2(x), tag 7$
we have
$z'' + p(x) z' + q(x) z = 0, ; z(a) = z(b) = 0; tag 8$
now if $z'(a) = 0$, then by uniqueness of solutions we must have $z(x) = 0$, $x in [a, b]$, since $z(a) = 0$, and thus $y_1(x) = y_2(x)$, and we are done; so we assume $z'(a) ne 0$; in fact, since (8) is linear, we may take $z'(a) > 0$, and thus, by the continuity of $z'(x)$, there is some $delta > 0$ such that
$z'(x) > 0, ; x in [a, a + delta); tag 9$
we then have
$z(x) = z(x) - z(a) = displaystyle int_0^x z'(s) ; ds > 0, x in (a, a + delta); tag{10}$
since $z(x) > 0$ somewhere on $[a, b]$, it must have a positive absolute maximum $x_M in (a, b)$; at such a point
$z'(x_M) = 0, tag{11}$
and thus by (8),
$z''(x_M) = -q(x_M)z(x_M) > 0 tag{12}$
by virtue of the facts that $z(x_M) > 0$, $q(x_M) < 0$; but (12) is impossible at a maximum of $z(x)$, where we must have $z''(x_M) le 0$; this contradiction forces $z'(a) = 0$ and thus also
$z(x) = 0, ; x in [a, b], tag{13}$
and hence
$y_1(x) - y_2(x) = z(x) = 0, ; x in [a, b]; tag{14}$
we conclude the equation (1) with boundary conditions (2) has at most one solution on $[a, b]$.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
why does $z'(a)=0$ lead to $z(x)=0$ and what does "by the uniqueness of solutions" mean?
$endgroup$
– X.T Chen
Dec 24 '18 at 6:17
$begingroup$
@X.TChen: it's the standard result on uniqueness of solutions to ODEs with initial conditions. $z(x) =0$ is the only solution with $z(a) = z'(a) = 0$. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Picard%E2%80%93Lindel%C3%B6f_theorem
$endgroup$
– Robert Lewis
Dec 24 '18 at 6:20
$begingroup$
@X.TChen: "uniqueness of solutions" means there is at most one solution for given initial conditions. So since solutions are unique, we have $z(x) = 0$ if $z(a) = z'(a) = 0$.
$endgroup$
– Robert Lewis
Dec 24 '18 at 6:23
$begingroup$
picard theorem only gives the situation of order one, does it hold for order two? and what is the $z(b)=0$ used for?
$endgroup$
– X.T Chen
Dec 24 '18 at 6:39
$begingroup$
@X.TChen: Picard-Lindeloef extends to all orders. $z(b) = 0$ is what forces a maximum of $z(x)$ to exist; it means that $z(x)$, once positive, must return to $0$ and not just keep growing.
$endgroup$
– Robert Lewis
Dec 24 '18 at 6:44
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose $y_1(x)$ and $y_2(x)$ both satisfy
$y'' + p(x) y' + q(x)y = r(x) tag 1$
with
$y_1(a) = y_2(a) = A, ; y_1(b) = y_2(b) = B; tag 2$
then we have
$y_1'' + p(x) y_1' + q(x)y_1 = r(x) tag 3$
and
$y_2'' + p(x) y_2' + q(x)y_2 = r(x), tag 4$
and, subtracting,
$(y_1 - y_2)'' + p(x) (y_1 - y_2)' + q(x)(y_1 - y_2) = 0, tag 5$
and
$(y_1 - y_2)(a) = y_1(a) - y_2(a) = 0 = y_1(b) - y_2(b) = (y_1 - y_2)(b); tag 6$
setting
$z(x) = y_1(x) - y_2(x), tag 7$
we have
$z'' + p(x) z' + q(x) z = 0, ; z(a) = z(b) = 0; tag 8$
now if $z'(a) = 0$, then by uniqueness of solutions we must have $z(x) = 0$, $x in [a, b]$, since $z(a) = 0$, and thus $y_1(x) = y_2(x)$, and we are done; so we assume $z'(a) ne 0$; in fact, since (8) is linear, we may take $z'(a) > 0$, and thus, by the continuity of $z'(x)$, there is some $delta > 0$ such that
$z'(x) > 0, ; x in [a, a + delta); tag 9$
we then have
$z(x) = z(x) - z(a) = displaystyle int_0^x z'(s) ; ds > 0, x in (a, a + delta); tag{10}$
since $z(x) > 0$ somewhere on $[a, b]$, it must have a positive absolute maximum $x_M in (a, b)$; at such a point
$z'(x_M) = 0, tag{11}$
and thus by (8),
$z''(x_M) = -q(x_M)z(x_M) > 0 tag{12}$
by virtue of the facts that $z(x_M) > 0$, $q(x_M) < 0$; but (12) is impossible at a maximum of $z(x)$, where we must have $z''(x_M) le 0$; this contradiction forces $z'(a) = 0$ and thus also
$z(x) = 0, ; x in [a, b], tag{13}$
and hence
$y_1(x) - y_2(x) = z(x) = 0, ; x in [a, b]; tag{14}$
we conclude the equation (1) with boundary conditions (2) has at most one solution on $[a, b]$.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
why does $z'(a)=0$ lead to $z(x)=0$ and what does "by the uniqueness of solutions" mean?
$endgroup$
– X.T Chen
Dec 24 '18 at 6:17
$begingroup$
@X.TChen: it's the standard result on uniqueness of solutions to ODEs with initial conditions. $z(x) =0$ is the only solution with $z(a) = z'(a) = 0$. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Picard%E2%80%93Lindel%C3%B6f_theorem
$endgroup$
– Robert Lewis
Dec 24 '18 at 6:20
$begingroup$
@X.TChen: "uniqueness of solutions" means there is at most one solution for given initial conditions. So since solutions are unique, we have $z(x) = 0$ if $z(a) = z'(a) = 0$.
$endgroup$
– Robert Lewis
Dec 24 '18 at 6:23
$begingroup$
picard theorem only gives the situation of order one, does it hold for order two? and what is the $z(b)=0$ used for?
$endgroup$
– X.T Chen
Dec 24 '18 at 6:39
$begingroup$
@X.TChen: Picard-Lindeloef extends to all orders. $z(b) = 0$ is what forces a maximum of $z(x)$ to exist; it means that $z(x)$, once positive, must return to $0$ and not just keep growing.
$endgroup$
– Robert Lewis
Dec 24 '18 at 6:44
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose $y_1(x)$ and $y_2(x)$ both satisfy
$y'' + p(x) y' + q(x)y = r(x) tag 1$
with
$y_1(a) = y_2(a) = A, ; y_1(b) = y_2(b) = B; tag 2$
then we have
$y_1'' + p(x) y_1' + q(x)y_1 = r(x) tag 3$
and
$y_2'' + p(x) y_2' + q(x)y_2 = r(x), tag 4$
and, subtracting,
$(y_1 - y_2)'' + p(x) (y_1 - y_2)' + q(x)(y_1 - y_2) = 0, tag 5$
and
$(y_1 - y_2)(a) = y_1(a) - y_2(a) = 0 = y_1(b) - y_2(b) = (y_1 - y_2)(b); tag 6$
setting
$z(x) = y_1(x) - y_2(x), tag 7$
we have
$z'' + p(x) z' + q(x) z = 0, ; z(a) = z(b) = 0; tag 8$
now if $z'(a) = 0$, then by uniqueness of solutions we must have $z(x) = 0$, $x in [a, b]$, since $z(a) = 0$, and thus $y_1(x) = y_2(x)$, and we are done; so we assume $z'(a) ne 0$; in fact, since (8) is linear, we may take $z'(a) > 0$, and thus, by the continuity of $z'(x)$, there is some $delta > 0$ such that
$z'(x) > 0, ; x in [a, a + delta); tag 9$
we then have
$z(x) = z(x) - z(a) = displaystyle int_0^x z'(s) ; ds > 0, x in (a, a + delta); tag{10}$
since $z(x) > 0$ somewhere on $[a, b]$, it must have a positive absolute maximum $x_M in (a, b)$; at such a point
$z'(x_M) = 0, tag{11}$
and thus by (8),
$z''(x_M) = -q(x_M)z(x_M) > 0 tag{12}$
by virtue of the facts that $z(x_M) > 0$, $q(x_M) < 0$; but (12) is impossible at a maximum of $z(x)$, where we must have $z''(x_M) le 0$; this contradiction forces $z'(a) = 0$ and thus also
$z(x) = 0, ; x in [a, b], tag{13}$
and hence
$y_1(x) - y_2(x) = z(x) = 0, ; x in [a, b]; tag{14}$
we conclude the equation (1) with boundary conditions (2) has at most one solution on $[a, b]$.
$endgroup$
Suppose $y_1(x)$ and $y_2(x)$ both satisfy
$y'' + p(x) y' + q(x)y = r(x) tag 1$
with
$y_1(a) = y_2(a) = A, ; y_1(b) = y_2(b) = B; tag 2$
then we have
$y_1'' + p(x) y_1' + q(x)y_1 = r(x) tag 3$
and
$y_2'' + p(x) y_2' + q(x)y_2 = r(x), tag 4$
and, subtracting,
$(y_1 - y_2)'' + p(x) (y_1 - y_2)' + q(x)(y_1 - y_2) = 0, tag 5$
and
$(y_1 - y_2)(a) = y_1(a) - y_2(a) = 0 = y_1(b) - y_2(b) = (y_1 - y_2)(b); tag 6$
setting
$z(x) = y_1(x) - y_2(x), tag 7$
we have
$z'' + p(x) z' + q(x) z = 0, ; z(a) = z(b) = 0; tag 8$
now if $z'(a) = 0$, then by uniqueness of solutions we must have $z(x) = 0$, $x in [a, b]$, since $z(a) = 0$, and thus $y_1(x) = y_2(x)$, and we are done; so we assume $z'(a) ne 0$; in fact, since (8) is linear, we may take $z'(a) > 0$, and thus, by the continuity of $z'(x)$, there is some $delta > 0$ such that
$z'(x) > 0, ; x in [a, a + delta); tag 9$
we then have
$z(x) = z(x) - z(a) = displaystyle int_0^x z'(s) ; ds > 0, x in (a, a + delta); tag{10}$
since $z(x) > 0$ somewhere on $[a, b]$, it must have a positive absolute maximum $x_M in (a, b)$; at such a point
$z'(x_M) = 0, tag{11}$
and thus by (8),
$z''(x_M) = -q(x_M)z(x_M) > 0 tag{12}$
by virtue of the facts that $z(x_M) > 0$, $q(x_M) < 0$; but (12) is impossible at a maximum of $z(x)$, where we must have $z''(x_M) le 0$; this contradiction forces $z'(a) = 0$ and thus also
$z(x) = 0, ; x in [a, b], tag{13}$
and hence
$y_1(x) - y_2(x) = z(x) = 0, ; x in [a, b]; tag{14}$
we conclude the equation (1) with boundary conditions (2) has at most one solution on $[a, b]$.
edited Dec 24 '18 at 6:15
answered Dec 24 '18 at 6:00
Robert LewisRobert Lewis
44.9k22964
44.9k22964
1
$begingroup$
why does $z'(a)=0$ lead to $z(x)=0$ and what does "by the uniqueness of solutions" mean?
$endgroup$
– X.T Chen
Dec 24 '18 at 6:17
$begingroup$
@X.TChen: it's the standard result on uniqueness of solutions to ODEs with initial conditions. $z(x) =0$ is the only solution with $z(a) = z'(a) = 0$. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Picard%E2%80%93Lindel%C3%B6f_theorem
$endgroup$
– Robert Lewis
Dec 24 '18 at 6:20
$begingroup$
@X.TChen: "uniqueness of solutions" means there is at most one solution for given initial conditions. So since solutions are unique, we have $z(x) = 0$ if $z(a) = z'(a) = 0$.
$endgroup$
– Robert Lewis
Dec 24 '18 at 6:23
$begingroup$
picard theorem only gives the situation of order one, does it hold for order two? and what is the $z(b)=0$ used for?
$endgroup$
– X.T Chen
Dec 24 '18 at 6:39
$begingroup$
@X.TChen: Picard-Lindeloef extends to all orders. $z(b) = 0$ is what forces a maximum of $z(x)$ to exist; it means that $z(x)$, once positive, must return to $0$ and not just keep growing.
$endgroup$
– Robert Lewis
Dec 24 '18 at 6:44
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
why does $z'(a)=0$ lead to $z(x)=0$ and what does "by the uniqueness of solutions" mean?
$endgroup$
– X.T Chen
Dec 24 '18 at 6:17
$begingroup$
@X.TChen: it's the standard result on uniqueness of solutions to ODEs with initial conditions. $z(x) =0$ is the only solution with $z(a) = z'(a) = 0$. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Picard%E2%80%93Lindel%C3%B6f_theorem
$endgroup$
– Robert Lewis
Dec 24 '18 at 6:20
$begingroup$
@X.TChen: "uniqueness of solutions" means there is at most one solution for given initial conditions. So since solutions are unique, we have $z(x) = 0$ if $z(a) = z'(a) = 0$.
$endgroup$
– Robert Lewis
Dec 24 '18 at 6:23
$begingroup$
picard theorem only gives the situation of order one, does it hold for order two? and what is the $z(b)=0$ used for?
$endgroup$
– X.T Chen
Dec 24 '18 at 6:39
$begingroup$
@X.TChen: Picard-Lindeloef extends to all orders. $z(b) = 0$ is what forces a maximum of $z(x)$ to exist; it means that $z(x)$, once positive, must return to $0$ and not just keep growing.
$endgroup$
– Robert Lewis
Dec 24 '18 at 6:44
1
1
$begingroup$
why does $z'(a)=0$ lead to $z(x)=0$ and what does "by the uniqueness of solutions" mean?
$endgroup$
– X.T Chen
Dec 24 '18 at 6:17
$begingroup$
why does $z'(a)=0$ lead to $z(x)=0$ and what does "by the uniqueness of solutions" mean?
$endgroup$
– X.T Chen
Dec 24 '18 at 6:17
$begingroup$
@X.TChen: it's the standard result on uniqueness of solutions to ODEs with initial conditions. $z(x) =0$ is the only solution with $z(a) = z'(a) = 0$. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Picard%E2%80%93Lindel%C3%B6f_theorem
$endgroup$
– Robert Lewis
Dec 24 '18 at 6:20
$begingroup$
@X.TChen: it's the standard result on uniqueness of solutions to ODEs with initial conditions. $z(x) =0$ is the only solution with $z(a) = z'(a) = 0$. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Picard%E2%80%93Lindel%C3%B6f_theorem
$endgroup$
– Robert Lewis
Dec 24 '18 at 6:20
$begingroup$
@X.TChen: "uniqueness of solutions" means there is at most one solution for given initial conditions. So since solutions are unique, we have $z(x) = 0$ if $z(a) = z'(a) = 0$.
$endgroup$
– Robert Lewis
Dec 24 '18 at 6:23
$begingroup$
@X.TChen: "uniqueness of solutions" means there is at most one solution for given initial conditions. So since solutions are unique, we have $z(x) = 0$ if $z(a) = z'(a) = 0$.
$endgroup$
– Robert Lewis
Dec 24 '18 at 6:23
$begingroup$
picard theorem only gives the situation of order one, does it hold for order two? and what is the $z(b)=0$ used for?
$endgroup$
– X.T Chen
Dec 24 '18 at 6:39
$begingroup$
picard theorem only gives the situation of order one, does it hold for order two? and what is the $z(b)=0$ used for?
$endgroup$
– X.T Chen
Dec 24 '18 at 6:39
$begingroup$
@X.TChen: Picard-Lindeloef extends to all orders. $z(b) = 0$ is what forces a maximum of $z(x)$ to exist; it means that $z(x)$, once positive, must return to $0$ and not just keep growing.
$endgroup$
– Robert Lewis
Dec 24 '18 at 6:44
$begingroup$
@X.TChen: Picard-Lindeloef extends to all orders. $z(b) = 0$ is what forces a maximum of $z(x)$ to exist; it means that $z(x)$, once positive, must return to $0$ and not just keep growing.
$endgroup$
– Robert Lewis
Dec 24 '18 at 6:44
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3050962%2fhow-to-prove-the-existence-and-uniqueness-of-the-solution-of-a-second-order-line%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown