Where does this memory leak come from?












-3















In my implementation of ArrayList I have a method for resizing the array. It looks like this:



template<typename T>
int ArrayList<T>::changeSize(int newsize)
{
T* tmp = (T*)(T*)realloc(internal_array,sizeof(T)*newsize);
if(tmp == NULL)
{
return 0;
}
internal_array=tmp;
Capacity = newsize;
return 1;
}


This part of code causes a memory leak when using it, any idea, what could be wrong here?
EDIT: Handling realloc being NULL still didn't help, updated the code and added adress sanitizer output:



=================================================================
==4615==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks



Direct leak of 16 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:



#0 0x7f0c9d1b5f40 in realloc (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.4+0xdef40)
#1 0x557b3b693fb2 in ArrayList<int>::changeSize(int) (/media/mdvorak/Maxtor/Vysoká Škola/PA1/progtest5/a.out+0x2fb2)
#2 0x557b3b6939c4 in ArrayList<int>::Add(int) (/media/mdvorak/Maxtor/Vysoká Škola/PA1/progtest5/a.out+0x29c4)
#3 0x557b3b692671 in readInput(ArrayList<int>*) (/media/mdvorak/Maxtor/Vysoká Škola/PA1/progtest5/a.out+0x1671)
#4 0x557b3b693339 in main (/media/mdvorak/Maxtor/Vysoká Škola/PA1/progtest5/a.out+0x2339)
#5 0x7f0c9cd07b96 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21b96)


Direct leak of 4 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:



#0 0x7f0c9d1b5f40 in realloc (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.4+0xdef40)
#1 0x557b3b693fb2 in ArrayList<int>::changeSize(int) (/media/mdvorak/Maxtor/Vysoká Škola/PA1/progtest5/a.out+0x2fb2)
#2 0x557b3b693e0b in ArrayList<int>::Remove(int) (/media/mdvorak/Maxtor/Vysoká Škola/PA1/progtest5/a.out+0x2e0b)
#3 0x557b3b692d07 in findMinDistances(ArrayList<int>) (/media/mdvorak/Maxtor/Vysoká Škola/PA1/progtest5/a.out+0x1d07)
#4 0x557b3b6934a3 in main (/media/mdvorak/Maxtor/Vysoká Škola/PA1/progtest5/a.out+0x24a3)
#5 0x7f0c9cd07b96 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21b96)


SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 20 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s).










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    How do you determine that it leaks? What do you do if realloc() fails? Curious: what is T?

    – Swordfish
    Nov 21 '18 at 2:08








  • 3





    The correct way to call realloc is to save the return value in a temporary variable and check it for NULL. That way if realloc has failed, you haven't lost your original memory, like in this answer: stackoverflow.com/a/44789446/1212725

    – bruceg
    Nov 21 '18 at 2:21











  • @Swordfish, it's a generic type, but in my program it's an integer (int)

    – Michal Dvořák
    Nov 21 '18 at 11:03











  • Updated my question, checking the realloc is NULL didn't help.

    – Michal Dvořák
    Nov 21 '18 at 11:20











  • Are you sure that internal_array holds either NULL or a valid pointer value returned by malloc(), calloc(), realloc(NULL, ...) before you call realloc() with it as the firest parameter?

    – Swordfish
    Nov 21 '18 at 13:42


















-3















In my implementation of ArrayList I have a method for resizing the array. It looks like this:



template<typename T>
int ArrayList<T>::changeSize(int newsize)
{
T* tmp = (T*)(T*)realloc(internal_array,sizeof(T)*newsize);
if(tmp == NULL)
{
return 0;
}
internal_array=tmp;
Capacity = newsize;
return 1;
}


This part of code causes a memory leak when using it, any idea, what could be wrong here?
EDIT: Handling realloc being NULL still didn't help, updated the code and added adress sanitizer output:



=================================================================
==4615==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks



Direct leak of 16 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:



#0 0x7f0c9d1b5f40 in realloc (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.4+0xdef40)
#1 0x557b3b693fb2 in ArrayList<int>::changeSize(int) (/media/mdvorak/Maxtor/Vysoká Škola/PA1/progtest5/a.out+0x2fb2)
#2 0x557b3b6939c4 in ArrayList<int>::Add(int) (/media/mdvorak/Maxtor/Vysoká Škola/PA1/progtest5/a.out+0x29c4)
#3 0x557b3b692671 in readInput(ArrayList<int>*) (/media/mdvorak/Maxtor/Vysoká Škola/PA1/progtest5/a.out+0x1671)
#4 0x557b3b693339 in main (/media/mdvorak/Maxtor/Vysoká Škola/PA1/progtest5/a.out+0x2339)
#5 0x7f0c9cd07b96 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21b96)


Direct leak of 4 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:



#0 0x7f0c9d1b5f40 in realloc (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.4+0xdef40)
#1 0x557b3b693fb2 in ArrayList<int>::changeSize(int) (/media/mdvorak/Maxtor/Vysoká Škola/PA1/progtest5/a.out+0x2fb2)
#2 0x557b3b693e0b in ArrayList<int>::Remove(int) (/media/mdvorak/Maxtor/Vysoká Škola/PA1/progtest5/a.out+0x2e0b)
#3 0x557b3b692d07 in findMinDistances(ArrayList<int>) (/media/mdvorak/Maxtor/Vysoká Škola/PA1/progtest5/a.out+0x1d07)
#4 0x557b3b6934a3 in main (/media/mdvorak/Maxtor/Vysoká Škola/PA1/progtest5/a.out+0x24a3)
#5 0x7f0c9cd07b96 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21b96)


SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 20 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s).










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    How do you determine that it leaks? What do you do if realloc() fails? Curious: what is T?

    – Swordfish
    Nov 21 '18 at 2:08








  • 3





    The correct way to call realloc is to save the return value in a temporary variable and check it for NULL. That way if realloc has failed, you haven't lost your original memory, like in this answer: stackoverflow.com/a/44789446/1212725

    – bruceg
    Nov 21 '18 at 2:21











  • @Swordfish, it's a generic type, but in my program it's an integer (int)

    – Michal Dvořák
    Nov 21 '18 at 11:03











  • Updated my question, checking the realloc is NULL didn't help.

    – Michal Dvořák
    Nov 21 '18 at 11:20











  • Are you sure that internal_array holds either NULL or a valid pointer value returned by malloc(), calloc(), realloc(NULL, ...) before you call realloc() with it as the firest parameter?

    – Swordfish
    Nov 21 '18 at 13:42
















-3












-3








-3








In my implementation of ArrayList I have a method for resizing the array. It looks like this:



template<typename T>
int ArrayList<T>::changeSize(int newsize)
{
T* tmp = (T*)(T*)realloc(internal_array,sizeof(T)*newsize);
if(tmp == NULL)
{
return 0;
}
internal_array=tmp;
Capacity = newsize;
return 1;
}


This part of code causes a memory leak when using it, any idea, what could be wrong here?
EDIT: Handling realloc being NULL still didn't help, updated the code and added adress sanitizer output:



=================================================================
==4615==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks



Direct leak of 16 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:



#0 0x7f0c9d1b5f40 in realloc (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.4+0xdef40)
#1 0x557b3b693fb2 in ArrayList<int>::changeSize(int) (/media/mdvorak/Maxtor/Vysoká Škola/PA1/progtest5/a.out+0x2fb2)
#2 0x557b3b6939c4 in ArrayList<int>::Add(int) (/media/mdvorak/Maxtor/Vysoká Škola/PA1/progtest5/a.out+0x29c4)
#3 0x557b3b692671 in readInput(ArrayList<int>*) (/media/mdvorak/Maxtor/Vysoká Škola/PA1/progtest5/a.out+0x1671)
#4 0x557b3b693339 in main (/media/mdvorak/Maxtor/Vysoká Škola/PA1/progtest5/a.out+0x2339)
#5 0x7f0c9cd07b96 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21b96)


Direct leak of 4 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:



#0 0x7f0c9d1b5f40 in realloc (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.4+0xdef40)
#1 0x557b3b693fb2 in ArrayList<int>::changeSize(int) (/media/mdvorak/Maxtor/Vysoká Škola/PA1/progtest5/a.out+0x2fb2)
#2 0x557b3b693e0b in ArrayList<int>::Remove(int) (/media/mdvorak/Maxtor/Vysoká Škola/PA1/progtest5/a.out+0x2e0b)
#3 0x557b3b692d07 in findMinDistances(ArrayList<int>) (/media/mdvorak/Maxtor/Vysoká Škola/PA1/progtest5/a.out+0x1d07)
#4 0x557b3b6934a3 in main (/media/mdvorak/Maxtor/Vysoká Škola/PA1/progtest5/a.out+0x24a3)
#5 0x7f0c9cd07b96 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21b96)


SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 20 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s).










share|improve this question
















In my implementation of ArrayList I have a method for resizing the array. It looks like this:



template<typename T>
int ArrayList<T>::changeSize(int newsize)
{
T* tmp = (T*)(T*)realloc(internal_array,sizeof(T)*newsize);
if(tmp == NULL)
{
return 0;
}
internal_array=tmp;
Capacity = newsize;
return 1;
}


This part of code causes a memory leak when using it, any idea, what could be wrong here?
EDIT: Handling realloc being NULL still didn't help, updated the code and added adress sanitizer output:



=================================================================
==4615==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks



Direct leak of 16 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:



#0 0x7f0c9d1b5f40 in realloc (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.4+0xdef40)
#1 0x557b3b693fb2 in ArrayList<int>::changeSize(int) (/media/mdvorak/Maxtor/Vysoká Škola/PA1/progtest5/a.out+0x2fb2)
#2 0x557b3b6939c4 in ArrayList<int>::Add(int) (/media/mdvorak/Maxtor/Vysoká Škola/PA1/progtest5/a.out+0x29c4)
#3 0x557b3b692671 in readInput(ArrayList<int>*) (/media/mdvorak/Maxtor/Vysoká Škola/PA1/progtest5/a.out+0x1671)
#4 0x557b3b693339 in main (/media/mdvorak/Maxtor/Vysoká Škola/PA1/progtest5/a.out+0x2339)
#5 0x7f0c9cd07b96 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21b96)


Direct leak of 4 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:



#0 0x7f0c9d1b5f40 in realloc (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.4+0xdef40)
#1 0x557b3b693fb2 in ArrayList<int>::changeSize(int) (/media/mdvorak/Maxtor/Vysoká Škola/PA1/progtest5/a.out+0x2fb2)
#2 0x557b3b693e0b in ArrayList<int>::Remove(int) (/media/mdvorak/Maxtor/Vysoká Škola/PA1/progtest5/a.out+0x2e0b)
#3 0x557b3b692d07 in findMinDistances(ArrayList<int>) (/media/mdvorak/Maxtor/Vysoká Škola/PA1/progtest5/a.out+0x1d07)
#4 0x557b3b6934a3 in main (/media/mdvorak/Maxtor/Vysoká Škola/PA1/progtest5/a.out+0x24a3)
#5 0x7f0c9cd07b96 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21b96)


SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 20 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s).







c++ memory memory-leaks dynamic-memory-allocation realloc






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 21 '18 at 13:49









Swordfish

9,22211335




9,22211335










asked Nov 21 '18 at 2:02









Michal DvořákMichal Dvořák

1127




1127








  • 1





    How do you determine that it leaks? What do you do if realloc() fails? Curious: what is T?

    – Swordfish
    Nov 21 '18 at 2:08








  • 3





    The correct way to call realloc is to save the return value in a temporary variable and check it for NULL. That way if realloc has failed, you haven't lost your original memory, like in this answer: stackoverflow.com/a/44789446/1212725

    – bruceg
    Nov 21 '18 at 2:21











  • @Swordfish, it's a generic type, but in my program it's an integer (int)

    – Michal Dvořák
    Nov 21 '18 at 11:03











  • Updated my question, checking the realloc is NULL didn't help.

    – Michal Dvořák
    Nov 21 '18 at 11:20











  • Are you sure that internal_array holds either NULL or a valid pointer value returned by malloc(), calloc(), realloc(NULL, ...) before you call realloc() with it as the firest parameter?

    – Swordfish
    Nov 21 '18 at 13:42
















  • 1





    How do you determine that it leaks? What do you do if realloc() fails? Curious: what is T?

    – Swordfish
    Nov 21 '18 at 2:08








  • 3





    The correct way to call realloc is to save the return value in a temporary variable and check it for NULL. That way if realloc has failed, you haven't lost your original memory, like in this answer: stackoverflow.com/a/44789446/1212725

    – bruceg
    Nov 21 '18 at 2:21











  • @Swordfish, it's a generic type, but in my program it's an integer (int)

    – Michal Dvořák
    Nov 21 '18 at 11:03











  • Updated my question, checking the realloc is NULL didn't help.

    – Michal Dvořák
    Nov 21 '18 at 11:20











  • Are you sure that internal_array holds either NULL or a valid pointer value returned by malloc(), calloc(), realloc(NULL, ...) before you call realloc() with it as the firest parameter?

    – Swordfish
    Nov 21 '18 at 13:42










1




1





How do you determine that it leaks? What do you do if realloc() fails? Curious: what is T?

– Swordfish
Nov 21 '18 at 2:08







How do you determine that it leaks? What do you do if realloc() fails? Curious: what is T?

– Swordfish
Nov 21 '18 at 2:08






3




3





The correct way to call realloc is to save the return value in a temporary variable and check it for NULL. That way if realloc has failed, you haven't lost your original memory, like in this answer: stackoverflow.com/a/44789446/1212725

– bruceg
Nov 21 '18 at 2:21





The correct way to call realloc is to save the return value in a temporary variable and check it for NULL. That way if realloc has failed, you haven't lost your original memory, like in this answer: stackoverflow.com/a/44789446/1212725

– bruceg
Nov 21 '18 at 2:21













@Swordfish, it's a generic type, but in my program it's an integer (int)

– Michal Dvořák
Nov 21 '18 at 11:03





@Swordfish, it's a generic type, but in my program it's an integer (int)

– Michal Dvořák
Nov 21 '18 at 11:03













Updated my question, checking the realloc is NULL didn't help.

– Michal Dvořák
Nov 21 '18 at 11:20





Updated my question, checking the realloc is NULL didn't help.

– Michal Dvořák
Nov 21 '18 at 11:20













Are you sure that internal_array holds either NULL or a valid pointer value returned by malloc(), calloc(), realloc(NULL, ...) before you call realloc() with it as the firest parameter?

– Swordfish
Nov 21 '18 at 13:42







Are you sure that internal_array holds either NULL or a valid pointer value returned by malloc(), calloc(), realloc(NULL, ...) before you call realloc() with it as the firest parameter?

– Swordfish
Nov 21 '18 at 13:42














1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














You are reading the error wrong:



Direct leak of 16 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:

#0 0x7f0c9d1b5f40 in realloc (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.4+0xdef40)
#1 0x557b3b693fb2 in ArrayList<int>::changeSize(int) (/media/mdvorak/Maxtor/Vysoká Škola/PA1/progtest5/a.out+0x2fb2)
#2 0x557b3b6939c4 in ArrayList<int>::Add(int) (/media/mdvorak/Maxtor/Vysoká Škola/PA1/progtest5/a.out+0x29c4)
#3 0x557b3b692671 in readInput(ArrayList<int>*) (/media/mdvorak/Maxtor/Vysoká Škola/PA1/progtest5/a.out+0x1671)
#4 0x557b3b693339 in main (/media/mdvorak/Maxtor/Vysoká Škola/PA1/progtest5/a.out+0x2339)
#5 0x7f0c9cd07b96 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21b96)


It clearly says that the memory allocated at ArrayList<int>::changeSize(int) is the memory that leaks. It does not say what operation caused it to leak.



This means that changeSize(int) is ok. The problem lies elsewhere. You must make sure that the rule of 5 is followed:




  1. Destructor frees the memory.

  2. Copy constructor copies contents of internal_array, not the pointer.

  3. Assignment operator copies the contents, and not the pointer. Consider the copy-and-swap idiom.

  4. Move constructor copies the pointer, but nullifies the other object.

  5. Move assignment swaps the pointers, or assigns one pointer and frees the other.


The bug is probably due to missing, or wrong, one of the above. A good way to make it easier to catch such bugs during compile time, is to use std::unique_ptr with a custom deleter instead of freeing manually.



Please note that your code will crash and/or leak memory with anything complex, like T=vector or T=big num. You can add static_assert(std::is_trivial<T>::value); to make sure it is not instantiated with, e.g., std::map.






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    });
    });
    }, "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53404321%2fwhere-does-this-memory-leak-come-from%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1














    You are reading the error wrong:



    Direct leak of 16 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:

    #0 0x7f0c9d1b5f40 in realloc (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.4+0xdef40)
    #1 0x557b3b693fb2 in ArrayList<int>::changeSize(int) (/media/mdvorak/Maxtor/Vysoká Škola/PA1/progtest5/a.out+0x2fb2)
    #2 0x557b3b6939c4 in ArrayList<int>::Add(int) (/media/mdvorak/Maxtor/Vysoká Škola/PA1/progtest5/a.out+0x29c4)
    #3 0x557b3b692671 in readInput(ArrayList<int>*) (/media/mdvorak/Maxtor/Vysoká Škola/PA1/progtest5/a.out+0x1671)
    #4 0x557b3b693339 in main (/media/mdvorak/Maxtor/Vysoká Škola/PA1/progtest5/a.out+0x2339)
    #5 0x7f0c9cd07b96 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21b96)


    It clearly says that the memory allocated at ArrayList<int>::changeSize(int) is the memory that leaks. It does not say what operation caused it to leak.



    This means that changeSize(int) is ok. The problem lies elsewhere. You must make sure that the rule of 5 is followed:




    1. Destructor frees the memory.

    2. Copy constructor copies contents of internal_array, not the pointer.

    3. Assignment operator copies the contents, and not the pointer. Consider the copy-and-swap idiom.

    4. Move constructor copies the pointer, but nullifies the other object.

    5. Move assignment swaps the pointers, or assigns one pointer and frees the other.


    The bug is probably due to missing, or wrong, one of the above. A good way to make it easier to catch such bugs during compile time, is to use std::unique_ptr with a custom deleter instead of freeing manually.



    Please note that your code will crash and/or leak memory with anything complex, like T=vector or T=big num. You can add static_assert(std::is_trivial<T>::value); to make sure it is not instantiated with, e.g., std::map.






    share|improve this answer




























      1














      You are reading the error wrong:



      Direct leak of 16 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:

      #0 0x7f0c9d1b5f40 in realloc (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.4+0xdef40)
      #1 0x557b3b693fb2 in ArrayList<int>::changeSize(int) (/media/mdvorak/Maxtor/Vysoká Škola/PA1/progtest5/a.out+0x2fb2)
      #2 0x557b3b6939c4 in ArrayList<int>::Add(int) (/media/mdvorak/Maxtor/Vysoká Škola/PA1/progtest5/a.out+0x29c4)
      #3 0x557b3b692671 in readInput(ArrayList<int>*) (/media/mdvorak/Maxtor/Vysoká Škola/PA1/progtest5/a.out+0x1671)
      #4 0x557b3b693339 in main (/media/mdvorak/Maxtor/Vysoká Škola/PA1/progtest5/a.out+0x2339)
      #5 0x7f0c9cd07b96 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21b96)


      It clearly says that the memory allocated at ArrayList<int>::changeSize(int) is the memory that leaks. It does not say what operation caused it to leak.



      This means that changeSize(int) is ok. The problem lies elsewhere. You must make sure that the rule of 5 is followed:




      1. Destructor frees the memory.

      2. Copy constructor copies contents of internal_array, not the pointer.

      3. Assignment operator copies the contents, and not the pointer. Consider the copy-and-swap idiom.

      4. Move constructor copies the pointer, but nullifies the other object.

      5. Move assignment swaps the pointers, or assigns one pointer and frees the other.


      The bug is probably due to missing, or wrong, one of the above. A good way to make it easier to catch such bugs during compile time, is to use std::unique_ptr with a custom deleter instead of freeing manually.



      Please note that your code will crash and/or leak memory with anything complex, like T=vector or T=big num. You can add static_assert(std::is_trivial<T>::value); to make sure it is not instantiated with, e.g., std::map.






      share|improve this answer


























        1












        1








        1







        You are reading the error wrong:



        Direct leak of 16 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:

        #0 0x7f0c9d1b5f40 in realloc (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.4+0xdef40)
        #1 0x557b3b693fb2 in ArrayList<int>::changeSize(int) (/media/mdvorak/Maxtor/Vysoká Škola/PA1/progtest5/a.out+0x2fb2)
        #2 0x557b3b6939c4 in ArrayList<int>::Add(int) (/media/mdvorak/Maxtor/Vysoká Škola/PA1/progtest5/a.out+0x29c4)
        #3 0x557b3b692671 in readInput(ArrayList<int>*) (/media/mdvorak/Maxtor/Vysoká Škola/PA1/progtest5/a.out+0x1671)
        #4 0x557b3b693339 in main (/media/mdvorak/Maxtor/Vysoká Škola/PA1/progtest5/a.out+0x2339)
        #5 0x7f0c9cd07b96 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21b96)


        It clearly says that the memory allocated at ArrayList<int>::changeSize(int) is the memory that leaks. It does not say what operation caused it to leak.



        This means that changeSize(int) is ok. The problem lies elsewhere. You must make sure that the rule of 5 is followed:




        1. Destructor frees the memory.

        2. Copy constructor copies contents of internal_array, not the pointer.

        3. Assignment operator copies the contents, and not the pointer. Consider the copy-and-swap idiom.

        4. Move constructor copies the pointer, but nullifies the other object.

        5. Move assignment swaps the pointers, or assigns one pointer and frees the other.


        The bug is probably due to missing, or wrong, one of the above. A good way to make it easier to catch such bugs during compile time, is to use std::unique_ptr with a custom deleter instead of freeing manually.



        Please note that your code will crash and/or leak memory with anything complex, like T=vector or T=big num. You can add static_assert(std::is_trivial<T>::value); to make sure it is not instantiated with, e.g., std::map.






        share|improve this answer













        You are reading the error wrong:



        Direct leak of 16 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:

        #0 0x7f0c9d1b5f40 in realloc (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.4+0xdef40)
        #1 0x557b3b693fb2 in ArrayList<int>::changeSize(int) (/media/mdvorak/Maxtor/Vysoká Škola/PA1/progtest5/a.out+0x2fb2)
        #2 0x557b3b6939c4 in ArrayList<int>::Add(int) (/media/mdvorak/Maxtor/Vysoká Škola/PA1/progtest5/a.out+0x29c4)
        #3 0x557b3b692671 in readInput(ArrayList<int>*) (/media/mdvorak/Maxtor/Vysoká Škola/PA1/progtest5/a.out+0x1671)
        #4 0x557b3b693339 in main (/media/mdvorak/Maxtor/Vysoká Škola/PA1/progtest5/a.out+0x2339)
        #5 0x7f0c9cd07b96 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21b96)


        It clearly says that the memory allocated at ArrayList<int>::changeSize(int) is the memory that leaks. It does not say what operation caused it to leak.



        This means that changeSize(int) is ok. The problem lies elsewhere. You must make sure that the rule of 5 is followed:




        1. Destructor frees the memory.

        2. Copy constructor copies contents of internal_array, not the pointer.

        3. Assignment operator copies the contents, and not the pointer. Consider the copy-and-swap idiom.

        4. Move constructor copies the pointer, but nullifies the other object.

        5. Move assignment swaps the pointers, or assigns one pointer and frees the other.


        The bug is probably due to missing, or wrong, one of the above. A good way to make it easier to catch such bugs during compile time, is to use std::unique_ptr with a custom deleter instead of freeing manually.



        Please note that your code will crash and/or leak memory with anything complex, like T=vector or T=big num. You can add static_assert(std::is_trivial<T>::value); to make sure it is not instantiated with, e.g., std::map.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Nov 21 '18 at 14:26









        Michael VekslerMichael Veksler

        2,6071515




        2,6071515






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53404321%2fwhere-does-this-memory-leak-come-from%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

            Alcedinidae

            Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]