Is there a condition under which a child can be exempt from honoring his father?












1















This is a serious question seeking sources that discuss the topic.




  1. I speculate that a father that regrets his son being born, does not support him, does not teach him Torah or Mitzvos etc., is considered "תוהא על הראשונות" (Rambam: one that regrets doing a Mitzvah is not rewarded for it.) may somehow lose his right to Kibud Av of the child.


  2. Maybe serious child abuse or even rape can suffice.



Any sources or thoughts on this?










share|improve this question

























  • "On the day that I was born, Daddy sat down and cried..."--Robert Hunter/Jerry Garcia

    – Gary
    Dec 23 '18 at 23:43













  • Even a mamzer has to honor his parents, so the answer’s probably “no.”

    – DonielF
    Dec 24 '18 at 2:05






  • 1





    @donielF a rasha is diff,see my answer

    – sam
    Dec 24 '18 at 2:36











  • זכור... כבד. Shabbat

    – kouty
    Dec 24 '18 at 8:37
















1















This is a serious question seeking sources that discuss the topic.




  1. I speculate that a father that regrets his son being born, does not support him, does not teach him Torah or Mitzvos etc., is considered "תוהא על הראשונות" (Rambam: one that regrets doing a Mitzvah is not rewarded for it.) may somehow lose his right to Kibud Av of the child.


  2. Maybe serious child abuse or even rape can suffice.



Any sources or thoughts on this?










share|improve this question

























  • "On the day that I was born, Daddy sat down and cried..."--Robert Hunter/Jerry Garcia

    – Gary
    Dec 23 '18 at 23:43













  • Even a mamzer has to honor his parents, so the answer’s probably “no.”

    – DonielF
    Dec 24 '18 at 2:05






  • 1





    @donielF a rasha is diff,see my answer

    – sam
    Dec 24 '18 at 2:36











  • זכור... כבד. Shabbat

    – kouty
    Dec 24 '18 at 8:37














1












1








1








This is a serious question seeking sources that discuss the topic.




  1. I speculate that a father that regrets his son being born, does not support him, does not teach him Torah or Mitzvos etc., is considered "תוהא על הראשונות" (Rambam: one that regrets doing a Mitzvah is not rewarded for it.) may somehow lose his right to Kibud Av of the child.


  2. Maybe serious child abuse or even rape can suffice.



Any sources or thoughts on this?










share|improve this question
















This is a serious question seeking sources that discuss the topic.




  1. I speculate that a father that regrets his son being born, does not support him, does not teach him Torah or Mitzvos etc., is considered "תוהא על הראשונות" (Rambam: one that regrets doing a Mitzvah is not rewarded for it.) may somehow lose his right to Kibud Av of the child.


  2. Maybe serious child abuse or even rape can suffice.



Any sources or thoughts on this?







halacha kibbud-av-veim-honoring






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Dec 24 '18 at 7:57









WAF

17.1k43399




17.1k43399










asked Dec 23 '18 at 23:37









Al BerkoAl Berko

4,721526




4,721526













  • "On the day that I was born, Daddy sat down and cried..."--Robert Hunter/Jerry Garcia

    – Gary
    Dec 23 '18 at 23:43













  • Even a mamzer has to honor his parents, so the answer’s probably “no.”

    – DonielF
    Dec 24 '18 at 2:05






  • 1





    @donielF a rasha is diff,see my answer

    – sam
    Dec 24 '18 at 2:36











  • זכור... כבד. Shabbat

    – kouty
    Dec 24 '18 at 8:37



















  • "On the day that I was born, Daddy sat down and cried..."--Robert Hunter/Jerry Garcia

    – Gary
    Dec 23 '18 at 23:43













  • Even a mamzer has to honor his parents, so the answer’s probably “no.”

    – DonielF
    Dec 24 '18 at 2:05






  • 1





    @donielF a rasha is diff,see my answer

    – sam
    Dec 24 '18 at 2:36











  • זכור... כבד. Shabbat

    – kouty
    Dec 24 '18 at 8:37

















"On the day that I was born, Daddy sat down and cried..."--Robert Hunter/Jerry Garcia

– Gary
Dec 23 '18 at 23:43







"On the day that I was born, Daddy sat down and cried..."--Robert Hunter/Jerry Garcia

– Gary
Dec 23 '18 at 23:43















Even a mamzer has to honor his parents, so the answer’s probably “no.”

– DonielF
Dec 24 '18 at 2:05





Even a mamzer has to honor his parents, so the answer’s probably “no.”

– DonielF
Dec 24 '18 at 2:05




1




1





@donielF a rasha is diff,see my answer

– sam
Dec 24 '18 at 2:36





@donielF a rasha is diff,see my answer

– sam
Dec 24 '18 at 2:36













זכור... כבד. Shabbat

– kouty
Dec 24 '18 at 8:37





זכור... כבד. Shabbat

– kouty
Dec 24 '18 at 8:37










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















11














The Shulchan Aruch 240:18 discusses a father who is a Rasha. The Mechaber holds that there is Kibud av by a Rasha (not defined), but Ram"a argues.




ממזר חייב בכבוד אביו ובמוראו. אפילו היה אביו רשע ובעל עבירות – מכבדו ומתיירא ממנו.



הגה: ויש אומרים דאינו מחוייב לכבד אביו רשע, אלא אם כן עשה תשובה.

(טור ומרדכי פרק "כיצד", ובהגהות מיימוני פרק שישי דהלכות ממרים.)




There is a very good Hakira article on this subject.






share|improve this answer





















  • 2





    Good answer, +1. Consider summarizing some of the points in the article.

    – רבות מחשבות
    Dec 24 '18 at 5:10











  • 1. Thank you. 2. Do we say then that Sefardim honor anyway and Ashkenazis are exempt? :) How does יש אמרים value? I read Tur but he sounds very distant - a very weak proof (from a stolen cow...). 2.5 A very serious (albeit a bit biased) article. I also think it's worth to try to summarize it to the answer would be full and exhaustive.

    – Al Berko
    Dec 24 '18 at 12:00



















5














I think one can shed light on this issue by examining the sources regarding the term "honor" (sometimes translated also as "respect").



No where does it say to love, appreciate, etc etc. In fact I heard one Rabbi asked by a woman, what if the situation is so tense that every time she tries talking to her mother, things get dicey, and it seems her mother doesn't even want to talk to her. The rabbi's response: you honor her by NOT talking to her...



So yes, honor is required; but look closely at what practical implications this has in halacha.






share|improve this answer































    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    11














    The Shulchan Aruch 240:18 discusses a father who is a Rasha. The Mechaber holds that there is Kibud av by a Rasha (not defined), but Ram"a argues.




    ממזר חייב בכבוד אביו ובמוראו. אפילו היה אביו רשע ובעל עבירות – מכבדו ומתיירא ממנו.



    הגה: ויש אומרים דאינו מחוייב לכבד אביו רשע, אלא אם כן עשה תשובה.

    (טור ומרדכי פרק "כיצד", ובהגהות מיימוני פרק שישי דהלכות ממרים.)




    There is a very good Hakira article on this subject.






    share|improve this answer





















    • 2





      Good answer, +1. Consider summarizing some of the points in the article.

      – רבות מחשבות
      Dec 24 '18 at 5:10











    • 1. Thank you. 2. Do we say then that Sefardim honor anyway and Ashkenazis are exempt? :) How does יש אמרים value? I read Tur but he sounds very distant - a very weak proof (from a stolen cow...). 2.5 A very serious (albeit a bit biased) article. I also think it's worth to try to summarize it to the answer would be full and exhaustive.

      – Al Berko
      Dec 24 '18 at 12:00
















    11














    The Shulchan Aruch 240:18 discusses a father who is a Rasha. The Mechaber holds that there is Kibud av by a Rasha (not defined), but Ram"a argues.




    ממזר חייב בכבוד אביו ובמוראו. אפילו היה אביו רשע ובעל עבירות – מכבדו ומתיירא ממנו.



    הגה: ויש אומרים דאינו מחוייב לכבד אביו רשע, אלא אם כן עשה תשובה.

    (טור ומרדכי פרק "כיצד", ובהגהות מיימוני פרק שישי דהלכות ממרים.)




    There is a very good Hakira article on this subject.






    share|improve this answer





















    • 2





      Good answer, +1. Consider summarizing some of the points in the article.

      – רבות מחשבות
      Dec 24 '18 at 5:10











    • 1. Thank you. 2. Do we say then that Sefardim honor anyway and Ashkenazis are exempt? :) How does יש אמרים value? I read Tur but he sounds very distant - a very weak proof (from a stolen cow...). 2.5 A very serious (albeit a bit biased) article. I also think it's worth to try to summarize it to the answer would be full and exhaustive.

      – Al Berko
      Dec 24 '18 at 12:00














    11












    11








    11







    The Shulchan Aruch 240:18 discusses a father who is a Rasha. The Mechaber holds that there is Kibud av by a Rasha (not defined), but Ram"a argues.




    ממזר חייב בכבוד אביו ובמוראו. אפילו היה אביו רשע ובעל עבירות – מכבדו ומתיירא ממנו.



    הגה: ויש אומרים דאינו מחוייב לכבד אביו רשע, אלא אם כן עשה תשובה.

    (טור ומרדכי פרק "כיצד", ובהגהות מיימוני פרק שישי דהלכות ממרים.)




    There is a very good Hakira article on this subject.






    share|improve this answer















    The Shulchan Aruch 240:18 discusses a father who is a Rasha. The Mechaber holds that there is Kibud av by a Rasha (not defined), but Ram"a argues.




    ממזר חייב בכבוד אביו ובמוראו. אפילו היה אביו רשע ובעל עבירות – מכבדו ומתיירא ממנו.



    הגה: ויש אומרים דאינו מחוייב לכבד אביו רשע, אלא אם כן עשה תשובה.

    (טור ומרדכי פרק "כיצד", ובהגהות מיימוני פרק שישי דהלכות ממרים.)




    There is a very good Hakira article on this subject.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Dec 24 '18 at 11:54









    Al Berko

    4,721526




    4,721526










    answered Dec 24 '18 at 0:32









    samsam

    25.1k14895




    25.1k14895








    • 2





      Good answer, +1. Consider summarizing some of the points in the article.

      – רבות מחשבות
      Dec 24 '18 at 5:10











    • 1. Thank you. 2. Do we say then that Sefardim honor anyway and Ashkenazis are exempt? :) How does יש אמרים value? I read Tur but he sounds very distant - a very weak proof (from a stolen cow...). 2.5 A very serious (albeit a bit biased) article. I also think it's worth to try to summarize it to the answer would be full and exhaustive.

      – Al Berko
      Dec 24 '18 at 12:00














    • 2





      Good answer, +1. Consider summarizing some of the points in the article.

      – רבות מחשבות
      Dec 24 '18 at 5:10











    • 1. Thank you. 2. Do we say then that Sefardim honor anyway and Ashkenazis are exempt? :) How does יש אמרים value? I read Tur but he sounds very distant - a very weak proof (from a stolen cow...). 2.5 A very serious (albeit a bit biased) article. I also think it's worth to try to summarize it to the answer would be full and exhaustive.

      – Al Berko
      Dec 24 '18 at 12:00








    2




    2





    Good answer, +1. Consider summarizing some of the points in the article.

    – רבות מחשבות
    Dec 24 '18 at 5:10





    Good answer, +1. Consider summarizing some of the points in the article.

    – רבות מחשבות
    Dec 24 '18 at 5:10













    1. Thank you. 2. Do we say then that Sefardim honor anyway and Ashkenazis are exempt? :) How does יש אמרים value? I read Tur but he sounds very distant - a very weak proof (from a stolen cow...). 2.5 A very serious (albeit a bit biased) article. I also think it's worth to try to summarize it to the answer would be full and exhaustive.

    – Al Berko
    Dec 24 '18 at 12:00





    1. Thank you. 2. Do we say then that Sefardim honor anyway and Ashkenazis are exempt? :) How does יש אמרים value? I read Tur but he sounds very distant - a very weak proof (from a stolen cow...). 2.5 A very serious (albeit a bit biased) article. I also think it's worth to try to summarize it to the answer would be full and exhaustive.

    – Al Berko
    Dec 24 '18 at 12:00











    5














    I think one can shed light on this issue by examining the sources regarding the term "honor" (sometimes translated also as "respect").



    No where does it say to love, appreciate, etc etc. In fact I heard one Rabbi asked by a woman, what if the situation is so tense that every time she tries talking to her mother, things get dicey, and it seems her mother doesn't even want to talk to her. The rabbi's response: you honor her by NOT talking to her...



    So yes, honor is required; but look closely at what practical implications this has in halacha.






    share|improve this answer




























      5














      I think one can shed light on this issue by examining the sources regarding the term "honor" (sometimes translated also as "respect").



      No where does it say to love, appreciate, etc etc. In fact I heard one Rabbi asked by a woman, what if the situation is so tense that every time she tries talking to her mother, things get dicey, and it seems her mother doesn't even want to talk to her. The rabbi's response: you honor her by NOT talking to her...



      So yes, honor is required; but look closely at what practical implications this has in halacha.






      share|improve this answer


























        5












        5








        5







        I think one can shed light on this issue by examining the sources regarding the term "honor" (sometimes translated also as "respect").



        No where does it say to love, appreciate, etc etc. In fact I heard one Rabbi asked by a woman, what if the situation is so tense that every time she tries talking to her mother, things get dicey, and it seems her mother doesn't even want to talk to her. The rabbi's response: you honor her by NOT talking to her...



        So yes, honor is required; but look closely at what practical implications this has in halacha.






        share|improve this answer













        I think one can shed light on this issue by examining the sources regarding the term "honor" (sometimes translated also as "respect").



        No where does it say to love, appreciate, etc etc. In fact I heard one Rabbi asked by a woman, what if the situation is so tense that every time she tries talking to her mother, things get dicey, and it seems her mother doesn't even want to talk to her. The rabbi's response: you honor her by NOT talking to her...



        So yes, honor is required; but look closely at what practical implications this has in halacha.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Dec 24 '18 at 5:38









        YsiegelYsiegel

        1293




        1293















            Popular posts from this blog

            "Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

            Alcedinidae

            Origin of the phrase “under your belt”?