Operation Id is changeable when trace WPF operations by embedded ETW provider
I'm trying to trace WPF operations by ETW provider embedded into PresentationSource.
When I traced real application I was bit by changing already triggered operation Id from Post to Start phase.
At the source code I found that Id is relied on address of the object which might be changed during GC operation:
https://referencesource.microsoft.com/#windowsbase/Base/System/Windows/Threading/DispatcherOperation.cs,dff34e59b0cffd1e
Does anybody know how to track by ETW such object relocation?
c# wpf garbage-collection dispatcher etw
add a comment |
I'm trying to trace WPF operations by ETW provider embedded into PresentationSource.
When I traced real application I was bit by changing already triggered operation Id from Post to Start phase.
At the source code I found that Id is relied on address of the object which might be changed during GC operation:
https://referencesource.microsoft.com/#windowsbase/Base/System/Windows/Threading/DispatcherOperation.cs,dff34e59b0cffd1e
Does anybody know how to track by ETW such object relocation?
c# wpf garbage-collection dispatcher etw
add a comment |
I'm trying to trace WPF operations by ETW provider embedded into PresentationSource.
When I traced real application I was bit by changing already triggered operation Id from Post to Start phase.
At the source code I found that Id is relied on address of the object which might be changed during GC operation:
https://referencesource.microsoft.com/#windowsbase/Base/System/Windows/Threading/DispatcherOperation.cs,dff34e59b0cffd1e
Does anybody know how to track by ETW such object relocation?
c# wpf garbage-collection dispatcher etw
I'm trying to trace WPF operations by ETW provider embedded into PresentationSource.
When I traced real application I was bit by changing already triggered operation Id from Post to Start phase.
At the source code I found that Id is relied on address of the object which might be changed during GC operation:
https://referencesource.microsoft.com/#windowsbase/Base/System/Windows/Threading/DispatcherOperation.cs,dff34e59b0cffd1e
Does anybody know how to track by ETW such object relocation?
c# wpf garbage-collection dispatcher etw
c# wpf garbage-collection dispatcher etw
edited Nov 20 '18 at 16:20
Evgeny Burmakov
asked Nov 20 '18 at 14:06
Evgeny BurmakovEvgeny Burmakov
185
185
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Such movement might be tracked by:
ProviderName: "Microsoft-Windows-DotNETRuntime"
EventName: "GC/GCBulkMovedObjectRanges"
Event might be parsed by ClrTraceEventParser.GCBulkMovedObjectRanges
Originally answered there:
https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/7b6f9918-60ee-4e23-b443-42b4895775ad/how-to-track-change-of-wpf-dispatcheroperation-id?forum=netfxbcl
UPDATE:
Due to tracing WPF operations I would say that approach with changeable ID is worst ever implementation. It is implemented incorrectly.
Id has fixed address position during gather that Id but whole operation isn't ensure that tracing message contains correct address. It might be already moved when event is raised.
I got next event sequence:
- WClientUIContextPost
- GCBulkMovedObjectRanges
- WClientUIContextPost
Where last one may contains moved or unmoved Id. Only gods know.
The event GCBulkMovedObjectRanges is usable in 95%. But sometimes it is fails.
So it no way to track it reliable. Very sadly that this architectural/implementation mistake turn feature unusable.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53394807%2foperation-id-is-changeable-when-trace-wpf-operations-by-embedded-etw-provider%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Such movement might be tracked by:
ProviderName: "Microsoft-Windows-DotNETRuntime"
EventName: "GC/GCBulkMovedObjectRanges"
Event might be parsed by ClrTraceEventParser.GCBulkMovedObjectRanges
Originally answered there:
https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/7b6f9918-60ee-4e23-b443-42b4895775ad/how-to-track-change-of-wpf-dispatcheroperation-id?forum=netfxbcl
UPDATE:
Due to tracing WPF operations I would say that approach with changeable ID is worst ever implementation. It is implemented incorrectly.
Id has fixed address position during gather that Id but whole operation isn't ensure that tracing message contains correct address. It might be already moved when event is raised.
I got next event sequence:
- WClientUIContextPost
- GCBulkMovedObjectRanges
- WClientUIContextPost
Where last one may contains moved or unmoved Id. Only gods know.
The event GCBulkMovedObjectRanges is usable in 95%. But sometimes it is fails.
So it no way to track it reliable. Very sadly that this architectural/implementation mistake turn feature unusable.
add a comment |
Such movement might be tracked by:
ProviderName: "Microsoft-Windows-DotNETRuntime"
EventName: "GC/GCBulkMovedObjectRanges"
Event might be parsed by ClrTraceEventParser.GCBulkMovedObjectRanges
Originally answered there:
https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/7b6f9918-60ee-4e23-b443-42b4895775ad/how-to-track-change-of-wpf-dispatcheroperation-id?forum=netfxbcl
UPDATE:
Due to tracing WPF operations I would say that approach with changeable ID is worst ever implementation. It is implemented incorrectly.
Id has fixed address position during gather that Id but whole operation isn't ensure that tracing message contains correct address. It might be already moved when event is raised.
I got next event sequence:
- WClientUIContextPost
- GCBulkMovedObjectRanges
- WClientUIContextPost
Where last one may contains moved or unmoved Id. Only gods know.
The event GCBulkMovedObjectRanges is usable in 95%. But sometimes it is fails.
So it no way to track it reliable. Very sadly that this architectural/implementation mistake turn feature unusable.
add a comment |
Such movement might be tracked by:
ProviderName: "Microsoft-Windows-DotNETRuntime"
EventName: "GC/GCBulkMovedObjectRanges"
Event might be parsed by ClrTraceEventParser.GCBulkMovedObjectRanges
Originally answered there:
https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/7b6f9918-60ee-4e23-b443-42b4895775ad/how-to-track-change-of-wpf-dispatcheroperation-id?forum=netfxbcl
UPDATE:
Due to tracing WPF operations I would say that approach with changeable ID is worst ever implementation. It is implemented incorrectly.
Id has fixed address position during gather that Id but whole operation isn't ensure that tracing message contains correct address. It might be already moved when event is raised.
I got next event sequence:
- WClientUIContextPost
- GCBulkMovedObjectRanges
- WClientUIContextPost
Where last one may contains moved or unmoved Id. Only gods know.
The event GCBulkMovedObjectRanges is usable in 95%. But sometimes it is fails.
So it no way to track it reliable. Very sadly that this architectural/implementation mistake turn feature unusable.
Such movement might be tracked by:
ProviderName: "Microsoft-Windows-DotNETRuntime"
EventName: "GC/GCBulkMovedObjectRanges"
Event might be parsed by ClrTraceEventParser.GCBulkMovedObjectRanges
Originally answered there:
https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/7b6f9918-60ee-4e23-b443-42b4895775ad/how-to-track-change-of-wpf-dispatcheroperation-id?forum=netfxbcl
UPDATE:
Due to tracing WPF operations I would say that approach with changeable ID is worst ever implementation. It is implemented incorrectly.
Id has fixed address position during gather that Id but whole operation isn't ensure that tracing message contains correct address. It might be already moved when event is raised.
I got next event sequence:
- WClientUIContextPost
- GCBulkMovedObjectRanges
- WClientUIContextPost
Where last one may contains moved or unmoved Id. Only gods know.
The event GCBulkMovedObjectRanges is usable in 95%. But sometimes it is fails.
So it no way to track it reliable. Very sadly that this architectural/implementation mistake turn feature unusable.
edited Nov 29 '18 at 10:07
answered Nov 22 '18 at 14:52
Evgeny BurmakovEvgeny Burmakov
185
185
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53394807%2foperation-id-is-changeable-when-trace-wpf-operations-by-embedded-etw-provider%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown