System of equations has no solution












1















If the system of linear equations,
begin{cases}
x &+ ay &+ z &= 3\
x &+ 2y &+ 2z &= 6\
x &+ 5y &+ 3z &= b\
end{cases}

has no solution, then:




  1. $a=-1,b=9$

  2. $a=-1,b ne 9$

  3. $ane-1,b = 9$

  4. $a=1,b ne 9$




I really fail to understand why the answer cannot be option (1).



Here's my method:



For $a = -1$, the coefficient determinant determinant is 0. And if we create $Delta_z$, the determinant in which coefficients of $z$ are replaced by $3,6,b$, (b= 9), that determinant is non zero.



My book says that if coefficient determinant is $0$ and at least one of $Delta_y, Delta_z, Delta_x$ is non $0$ then the system has no solution.



But the answer given is $(2)$. What's wrong with my method? What's the best way to tackle such problems?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • For choice (1), isn't (x, y, z) = (4, 1, 0) a solution?
    – Gaffney
    Jan 2 at 22:07
















1















If the system of linear equations,
begin{cases}
x &+ ay &+ z &= 3\
x &+ 2y &+ 2z &= 6\
x &+ 5y &+ 3z &= b\
end{cases}

has no solution, then:




  1. $a=-1,b=9$

  2. $a=-1,b ne 9$

  3. $ane-1,b = 9$

  4. $a=1,b ne 9$




I really fail to understand why the answer cannot be option (1).



Here's my method:



For $a = -1$, the coefficient determinant determinant is 0. And if we create $Delta_z$, the determinant in which coefficients of $z$ are replaced by $3,6,b$, (b= 9), that determinant is non zero.



My book says that if coefficient determinant is $0$ and at least one of $Delta_y, Delta_z, Delta_x$ is non $0$ then the system has no solution.



But the answer given is $(2)$. What's wrong with my method? What's the best way to tackle such problems?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • For choice (1), isn't (x, y, z) = (4, 1, 0) a solution?
    – Gaffney
    Jan 2 at 22:07














1












1








1








If the system of linear equations,
begin{cases}
x &+ ay &+ z &= 3\
x &+ 2y &+ 2z &= 6\
x &+ 5y &+ 3z &= b\
end{cases}

has no solution, then:




  1. $a=-1,b=9$

  2. $a=-1,b ne 9$

  3. $ane-1,b = 9$

  4. $a=1,b ne 9$




I really fail to understand why the answer cannot be option (1).



Here's my method:



For $a = -1$, the coefficient determinant determinant is 0. And if we create $Delta_z$, the determinant in which coefficients of $z$ are replaced by $3,6,b$, (b= 9), that determinant is non zero.



My book says that if coefficient determinant is $0$ and at least one of $Delta_y, Delta_z, Delta_x$ is non $0$ then the system has no solution.



But the answer given is $(2)$. What's wrong with my method? What's the best way to tackle such problems?










share|cite|improve this question
















If the system of linear equations,
begin{cases}
x &+ ay &+ z &= 3\
x &+ 2y &+ 2z &= 6\
x &+ 5y &+ 3z &= b\
end{cases}

has no solution, then:




  1. $a=-1,b=9$

  2. $a=-1,b ne 9$

  3. $ane-1,b = 9$

  4. $a=1,b ne 9$




I really fail to understand why the answer cannot be option (1).



Here's my method:



For $a = -1$, the coefficient determinant determinant is 0. And if we create $Delta_z$, the determinant in which coefficients of $z$ are replaced by $3,6,b$, (b= 9), that determinant is non zero.



My book says that if coefficient determinant is $0$ and at least one of $Delta_y, Delta_z, Delta_x$ is non $0$ then the system has no solution.



But the answer given is $(2)$. What's wrong with my method? What's the best way to tackle such problems?







linear-algebra matrices systems-of-equations determinant






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 2 days ago









gt6989b

33.1k22452




33.1k22452










asked Jan 2 at 21:57









Abcd

3,02021134




3,02021134












  • For choice (1), isn't (x, y, z) = (4, 1, 0) a solution?
    – Gaffney
    Jan 2 at 22:07


















  • For choice (1), isn't (x, y, z) = (4, 1, 0) a solution?
    – Gaffney
    Jan 2 at 22:07
















For choice (1), isn't (x, y, z) = (4, 1, 0) a solution?
– Gaffney
Jan 2 at 22:07




For choice (1), isn't (x, y, z) = (4, 1, 0) a solution?
– Gaffney
Jan 2 at 22:07










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















4














You miscalculated $Delta_z$. The book solution is correct.
In order to have no solution, it is necessary that the determinant of the matrix of coefficients be zero: this indeed yields $a=-1$. The rank of the matrix is $2$ in this case, and up to a constant multiple, the only nontrivial "dependence" of the equations can be $1cdot (1)-2cdot (2) +1cdot (3) = 0$.
So under the $a=-1$ assumption, there are infinitely many solutions iff this generalizes to the right hand sides, that is, iff $3-2cdot 6 + b =0$, i.e., $b=9$.
Hence, the answer is $a=-1, bneq 9$.






share|cite|improve this answer





























    3














    I suppose the best way to tackle is to row-reduce the matrix and see what happens. You have to eliminate the third and the first columns:
    $$
    begin{pmatrix}
    1 & a & 1 & 3\
    1 & 2 & 2 & 6 \
    1 & 5 & 3 & b
    end{pmatrix}
    to
    begin{pmatrix}
    1 & a & 1 & 3\
    0 & 2-a & 1 & 3 \
    0 & 5-a & 2 & b-3
    end{pmatrix}
    to
    begin{pmatrix}
    1 & 2a-2 & 0 & 0\
    0 & 2-a & 1 & 3 \
    0 & 1+a & 0 & b-9
    end{pmatrix}
    $$

    so if $a=-1$ the last equation reads $0=b-9$, thus having $b=9$ you have $0=0$, which eliminates the equation, and now you have 2 equations in 3 unknowns, hence an infinite number of solutions. Thus (i) cannot be the answer.



    The condition for no solutions would require that $a=-1$ (forcing the last equation to read $0=b-9$) and $b ne 9$ (forcing it to be false).



    UPDATE



    In retrospect, as you say, if $a=-1$ then $Delta = 0$, so there will not be a unique solution. However, if $b = 9$, the last column of $Delta_z$ is $(3,6,9) = 3 times (1,2,3)$, so exactly $3$ times the last column of $Delta$, hence, $Delta_z = 3Delta = 0$, and the idea in your book is correct.






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • Question asks the condition for no solution...
      – Abcd
      Jan 2 at 22:16










    • @Abcd see update
      – gt6989b
      Jan 2 at 22:18










    • "you have to eliminate the third and the first columns"- why?
      – Abcd
      Jan 2 at 22:22










    • @Abcd because they have no variables, much easier to eliminate these than pivoting on column with $a$ in. You can still do it, but it is more arithmetic. BTW method of your book is correct, see another update
      – gt6989b
      Jan 2 at 22:25










    • Thanks for your time. I understand that you have applied transformations to the determinant. But I am unable to follow after that... What is the new determinant supposed to indicate?
      – Abcd
      Jan 2 at 22:27



















    0














    I would do it this way, using row reduction. The criterion for a non-homogeneous linear system to have solutions is that the matrix of the linear system (l.h.s.) and the augmented matrix have the same rank.



    From this criterion we deduce readily that if this system has no solution, the matrix of the l.h.s. cannot have rank $3$, hence its determinant, which is equal to $-(a+1)$ is zero, whence $a=-1$. Computing the determinant by row reduction shows this matrix has rank $2$.



    Now, if $a=-1$, the augmented matrix reduces as follows:
    $$begin{bmatrix}1&-1&1&3\1&2&2&6\1&5&3&bend{bmatrix}rightsquigarrow
    begin{bmatrix}1&-1&1&3\0&3&1&3\0&3&1&b-6end{bmatrix}rightsquigarrow
    begin{bmatrix}1&-1&1&3\0&3&1&3\0&0&0&b-9end{bmatrix} $$

    Thus, for $a=-1$, the augmented matrix has rank $3$ if and only if $b-9ne 0$.






    share|cite|improve this answer





























      0














      Rewrite the system as:
      $$
      AX=B
      $$

      where $X=(x,y,z)^t$, $B=(3,6,b)^t$ and
      $$A = begin{bmatrix}
      1 & a & 1 \
      1 & 2 & 2 \
      1 & 5 & 3
      end{bmatrix}$$



      First you must have $det(A)=0$ which after calculations give $a=-1$.
      So the system becomes:



      $$A = begin{bmatrix}
      1 & -1 & 1 \
      1 & 2 & 2 \
      1 & 5 & 3
      end{bmatrix}$$



      Now, row 3 becomes all zero when $r_3rightarrow r_3-2r_2+r_1$. Applying this to the augmented matrix $[A|B]$ gives the $(3,4)$ entry to be:
      $$
      b-9
      $$



      It is required that this entry is nonzero in order to have an inconsistent matrix.
      Thus, $a=-1, bneq 9$.






      share|cite|improve this answer





















        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        });
        });
        }, "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "69"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060025%2fsystem-of-equations-has-no-solution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes








        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        4














        You miscalculated $Delta_z$. The book solution is correct.
        In order to have no solution, it is necessary that the determinant of the matrix of coefficients be zero: this indeed yields $a=-1$. The rank of the matrix is $2$ in this case, and up to a constant multiple, the only nontrivial "dependence" of the equations can be $1cdot (1)-2cdot (2) +1cdot (3) = 0$.
        So under the $a=-1$ assumption, there are infinitely many solutions iff this generalizes to the right hand sides, that is, iff $3-2cdot 6 + b =0$, i.e., $b=9$.
        Hence, the answer is $a=-1, bneq 9$.






        share|cite|improve this answer


























          4














          You miscalculated $Delta_z$. The book solution is correct.
          In order to have no solution, it is necessary that the determinant of the matrix of coefficients be zero: this indeed yields $a=-1$. The rank of the matrix is $2$ in this case, and up to a constant multiple, the only nontrivial "dependence" of the equations can be $1cdot (1)-2cdot (2) +1cdot (3) = 0$.
          So under the $a=-1$ assumption, there are infinitely many solutions iff this generalizes to the right hand sides, that is, iff $3-2cdot 6 + b =0$, i.e., $b=9$.
          Hence, the answer is $a=-1, bneq 9$.






          share|cite|improve this answer
























            4












            4








            4






            You miscalculated $Delta_z$. The book solution is correct.
            In order to have no solution, it is necessary that the determinant of the matrix of coefficients be zero: this indeed yields $a=-1$. The rank of the matrix is $2$ in this case, and up to a constant multiple, the only nontrivial "dependence" of the equations can be $1cdot (1)-2cdot (2) +1cdot (3) = 0$.
            So under the $a=-1$ assumption, there are infinitely many solutions iff this generalizes to the right hand sides, that is, iff $3-2cdot 6 + b =0$, i.e., $b=9$.
            Hence, the answer is $a=-1, bneq 9$.






            share|cite|improve this answer












            You miscalculated $Delta_z$. The book solution is correct.
            In order to have no solution, it is necessary that the determinant of the matrix of coefficients be zero: this indeed yields $a=-1$. The rank of the matrix is $2$ in this case, and up to a constant multiple, the only nontrivial "dependence" of the equations can be $1cdot (1)-2cdot (2) +1cdot (3) = 0$.
            So under the $a=-1$ assumption, there are infinitely many solutions iff this generalizes to the right hand sides, that is, iff $3-2cdot 6 + b =0$, i.e., $b=9$.
            Hence, the answer is $a=-1, bneq 9$.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Jan 2 at 22:16









            A. Pongrácz

            5,4401827




            5,4401827























                3














                I suppose the best way to tackle is to row-reduce the matrix and see what happens. You have to eliminate the third and the first columns:
                $$
                begin{pmatrix}
                1 & a & 1 & 3\
                1 & 2 & 2 & 6 \
                1 & 5 & 3 & b
                end{pmatrix}
                to
                begin{pmatrix}
                1 & a & 1 & 3\
                0 & 2-a & 1 & 3 \
                0 & 5-a & 2 & b-3
                end{pmatrix}
                to
                begin{pmatrix}
                1 & 2a-2 & 0 & 0\
                0 & 2-a & 1 & 3 \
                0 & 1+a & 0 & b-9
                end{pmatrix}
                $$

                so if $a=-1$ the last equation reads $0=b-9$, thus having $b=9$ you have $0=0$, which eliminates the equation, and now you have 2 equations in 3 unknowns, hence an infinite number of solutions. Thus (i) cannot be the answer.



                The condition for no solutions would require that $a=-1$ (forcing the last equation to read $0=b-9$) and $b ne 9$ (forcing it to be false).



                UPDATE



                In retrospect, as you say, if $a=-1$ then $Delta = 0$, so there will not be a unique solution. However, if $b = 9$, the last column of $Delta_z$ is $(3,6,9) = 3 times (1,2,3)$, so exactly $3$ times the last column of $Delta$, hence, $Delta_z = 3Delta = 0$, and the idea in your book is correct.






                share|cite|improve this answer























                • Question asks the condition for no solution...
                  – Abcd
                  Jan 2 at 22:16










                • @Abcd see update
                  – gt6989b
                  Jan 2 at 22:18










                • "you have to eliminate the third and the first columns"- why?
                  – Abcd
                  Jan 2 at 22:22










                • @Abcd because they have no variables, much easier to eliminate these than pivoting on column with $a$ in. You can still do it, but it is more arithmetic. BTW method of your book is correct, see another update
                  – gt6989b
                  Jan 2 at 22:25










                • Thanks for your time. I understand that you have applied transformations to the determinant. But I am unable to follow after that... What is the new determinant supposed to indicate?
                  – Abcd
                  Jan 2 at 22:27
















                3














                I suppose the best way to tackle is to row-reduce the matrix and see what happens. You have to eliminate the third and the first columns:
                $$
                begin{pmatrix}
                1 & a & 1 & 3\
                1 & 2 & 2 & 6 \
                1 & 5 & 3 & b
                end{pmatrix}
                to
                begin{pmatrix}
                1 & a & 1 & 3\
                0 & 2-a & 1 & 3 \
                0 & 5-a & 2 & b-3
                end{pmatrix}
                to
                begin{pmatrix}
                1 & 2a-2 & 0 & 0\
                0 & 2-a & 1 & 3 \
                0 & 1+a & 0 & b-9
                end{pmatrix}
                $$

                so if $a=-1$ the last equation reads $0=b-9$, thus having $b=9$ you have $0=0$, which eliminates the equation, and now you have 2 equations in 3 unknowns, hence an infinite number of solutions. Thus (i) cannot be the answer.



                The condition for no solutions would require that $a=-1$ (forcing the last equation to read $0=b-9$) and $b ne 9$ (forcing it to be false).



                UPDATE



                In retrospect, as you say, if $a=-1$ then $Delta = 0$, so there will not be a unique solution. However, if $b = 9$, the last column of $Delta_z$ is $(3,6,9) = 3 times (1,2,3)$, so exactly $3$ times the last column of $Delta$, hence, $Delta_z = 3Delta = 0$, and the idea in your book is correct.






                share|cite|improve this answer























                • Question asks the condition for no solution...
                  – Abcd
                  Jan 2 at 22:16










                • @Abcd see update
                  – gt6989b
                  Jan 2 at 22:18










                • "you have to eliminate the third and the first columns"- why?
                  – Abcd
                  Jan 2 at 22:22










                • @Abcd because they have no variables, much easier to eliminate these than pivoting on column with $a$ in. You can still do it, but it is more arithmetic. BTW method of your book is correct, see another update
                  – gt6989b
                  Jan 2 at 22:25










                • Thanks for your time. I understand that you have applied transformations to the determinant. But I am unable to follow after that... What is the new determinant supposed to indicate?
                  – Abcd
                  Jan 2 at 22:27














                3












                3








                3






                I suppose the best way to tackle is to row-reduce the matrix and see what happens. You have to eliminate the third and the first columns:
                $$
                begin{pmatrix}
                1 & a & 1 & 3\
                1 & 2 & 2 & 6 \
                1 & 5 & 3 & b
                end{pmatrix}
                to
                begin{pmatrix}
                1 & a & 1 & 3\
                0 & 2-a & 1 & 3 \
                0 & 5-a & 2 & b-3
                end{pmatrix}
                to
                begin{pmatrix}
                1 & 2a-2 & 0 & 0\
                0 & 2-a & 1 & 3 \
                0 & 1+a & 0 & b-9
                end{pmatrix}
                $$

                so if $a=-1$ the last equation reads $0=b-9$, thus having $b=9$ you have $0=0$, which eliminates the equation, and now you have 2 equations in 3 unknowns, hence an infinite number of solutions. Thus (i) cannot be the answer.



                The condition for no solutions would require that $a=-1$ (forcing the last equation to read $0=b-9$) and $b ne 9$ (forcing it to be false).



                UPDATE



                In retrospect, as you say, if $a=-1$ then $Delta = 0$, so there will not be a unique solution. However, if $b = 9$, the last column of $Delta_z$ is $(3,6,9) = 3 times (1,2,3)$, so exactly $3$ times the last column of $Delta$, hence, $Delta_z = 3Delta = 0$, and the idea in your book is correct.






                share|cite|improve this answer














                I suppose the best way to tackle is to row-reduce the matrix and see what happens. You have to eliminate the third and the first columns:
                $$
                begin{pmatrix}
                1 & a & 1 & 3\
                1 & 2 & 2 & 6 \
                1 & 5 & 3 & b
                end{pmatrix}
                to
                begin{pmatrix}
                1 & a & 1 & 3\
                0 & 2-a & 1 & 3 \
                0 & 5-a & 2 & b-3
                end{pmatrix}
                to
                begin{pmatrix}
                1 & 2a-2 & 0 & 0\
                0 & 2-a & 1 & 3 \
                0 & 1+a & 0 & b-9
                end{pmatrix}
                $$

                so if $a=-1$ the last equation reads $0=b-9$, thus having $b=9$ you have $0=0$, which eliminates the equation, and now you have 2 equations in 3 unknowns, hence an infinite number of solutions. Thus (i) cannot be the answer.



                The condition for no solutions would require that $a=-1$ (forcing the last equation to read $0=b-9$) and $b ne 9$ (forcing it to be false).



                UPDATE



                In retrospect, as you say, if $a=-1$ then $Delta = 0$, so there will not be a unique solution. However, if $b = 9$, the last column of $Delta_z$ is $(3,6,9) = 3 times (1,2,3)$, so exactly $3$ times the last column of $Delta$, hence, $Delta_z = 3Delta = 0$, and the idea in your book is correct.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Jan 2 at 22:24

























                answered Jan 2 at 22:15









                gt6989b

                33.1k22452




                33.1k22452












                • Question asks the condition for no solution...
                  – Abcd
                  Jan 2 at 22:16










                • @Abcd see update
                  – gt6989b
                  Jan 2 at 22:18










                • "you have to eliminate the third and the first columns"- why?
                  – Abcd
                  Jan 2 at 22:22










                • @Abcd because they have no variables, much easier to eliminate these than pivoting on column with $a$ in. You can still do it, but it is more arithmetic. BTW method of your book is correct, see another update
                  – gt6989b
                  Jan 2 at 22:25










                • Thanks for your time. I understand that you have applied transformations to the determinant. But I am unable to follow after that... What is the new determinant supposed to indicate?
                  – Abcd
                  Jan 2 at 22:27


















                • Question asks the condition for no solution...
                  – Abcd
                  Jan 2 at 22:16










                • @Abcd see update
                  – gt6989b
                  Jan 2 at 22:18










                • "you have to eliminate the third and the first columns"- why?
                  – Abcd
                  Jan 2 at 22:22










                • @Abcd because they have no variables, much easier to eliminate these than pivoting on column with $a$ in. You can still do it, but it is more arithmetic. BTW method of your book is correct, see another update
                  – gt6989b
                  Jan 2 at 22:25










                • Thanks for your time. I understand that you have applied transformations to the determinant. But I am unable to follow after that... What is the new determinant supposed to indicate?
                  – Abcd
                  Jan 2 at 22:27
















                Question asks the condition for no solution...
                – Abcd
                Jan 2 at 22:16




                Question asks the condition for no solution...
                – Abcd
                Jan 2 at 22:16












                @Abcd see update
                – gt6989b
                Jan 2 at 22:18




                @Abcd see update
                – gt6989b
                Jan 2 at 22:18












                "you have to eliminate the third and the first columns"- why?
                – Abcd
                Jan 2 at 22:22




                "you have to eliminate the third and the first columns"- why?
                – Abcd
                Jan 2 at 22:22












                @Abcd because they have no variables, much easier to eliminate these than pivoting on column with $a$ in. You can still do it, but it is more arithmetic. BTW method of your book is correct, see another update
                – gt6989b
                Jan 2 at 22:25




                @Abcd because they have no variables, much easier to eliminate these than pivoting on column with $a$ in. You can still do it, but it is more arithmetic. BTW method of your book is correct, see another update
                – gt6989b
                Jan 2 at 22:25












                Thanks for your time. I understand that you have applied transformations to the determinant. But I am unable to follow after that... What is the new determinant supposed to indicate?
                – Abcd
                Jan 2 at 22:27




                Thanks for your time. I understand that you have applied transformations to the determinant. But I am unable to follow after that... What is the new determinant supposed to indicate?
                – Abcd
                Jan 2 at 22:27











                0














                I would do it this way, using row reduction. The criterion for a non-homogeneous linear system to have solutions is that the matrix of the linear system (l.h.s.) and the augmented matrix have the same rank.



                From this criterion we deduce readily that if this system has no solution, the matrix of the l.h.s. cannot have rank $3$, hence its determinant, which is equal to $-(a+1)$ is zero, whence $a=-1$. Computing the determinant by row reduction shows this matrix has rank $2$.



                Now, if $a=-1$, the augmented matrix reduces as follows:
                $$begin{bmatrix}1&-1&1&3\1&2&2&6\1&5&3&bend{bmatrix}rightsquigarrow
                begin{bmatrix}1&-1&1&3\0&3&1&3\0&3&1&b-6end{bmatrix}rightsquigarrow
                begin{bmatrix}1&-1&1&3\0&3&1&3\0&0&0&b-9end{bmatrix} $$

                Thus, for $a=-1$, the augmented matrix has rank $3$ if and only if $b-9ne 0$.






                share|cite|improve this answer


























                  0














                  I would do it this way, using row reduction. The criterion for a non-homogeneous linear system to have solutions is that the matrix of the linear system (l.h.s.) and the augmented matrix have the same rank.



                  From this criterion we deduce readily that if this system has no solution, the matrix of the l.h.s. cannot have rank $3$, hence its determinant, which is equal to $-(a+1)$ is zero, whence $a=-1$. Computing the determinant by row reduction shows this matrix has rank $2$.



                  Now, if $a=-1$, the augmented matrix reduces as follows:
                  $$begin{bmatrix}1&-1&1&3\1&2&2&6\1&5&3&bend{bmatrix}rightsquigarrow
                  begin{bmatrix}1&-1&1&3\0&3&1&3\0&3&1&b-6end{bmatrix}rightsquigarrow
                  begin{bmatrix}1&-1&1&3\0&3&1&3\0&0&0&b-9end{bmatrix} $$

                  Thus, for $a=-1$, the augmented matrix has rank $3$ if and only if $b-9ne 0$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer
























                    0












                    0








                    0






                    I would do it this way, using row reduction. The criterion for a non-homogeneous linear system to have solutions is that the matrix of the linear system (l.h.s.) and the augmented matrix have the same rank.



                    From this criterion we deduce readily that if this system has no solution, the matrix of the l.h.s. cannot have rank $3$, hence its determinant, which is equal to $-(a+1)$ is zero, whence $a=-1$. Computing the determinant by row reduction shows this matrix has rank $2$.



                    Now, if $a=-1$, the augmented matrix reduces as follows:
                    $$begin{bmatrix}1&-1&1&3\1&2&2&6\1&5&3&bend{bmatrix}rightsquigarrow
                    begin{bmatrix}1&-1&1&3\0&3&1&3\0&3&1&b-6end{bmatrix}rightsquigarrow
                    begin{bmatrix}1&-1&1&3\0&3&1&3\0&0&0&b-9end{bmatrix} $$

                    Thus, for $a=-1$, the augmented matrix has rank $3$ if and only if $b-9ne 0$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    I would do it this way, using row reduction. The criterion for a non-homogeneous linear system to have solutions is that the matrix of the linear system (l.h.s.) and the augmented matrix have the same rank.



                    From this criterion we deduce readily that if this system has no solution, the matrix of the l.h.s. cannot have rank $3$, hence its determinant, which is equal to $-(a+1)$ is zero, whence $a=-1$. Computing the determinant by row reduction shows this matrix has rank $2$.



                    Now, if $a=-1$, the augmented matrix reduces as follows:
                    $$begin{bmatrix}1&-1&1&3\1&2&2&6\1&5&3&bend{bmatrix}rightsquigarrow
                    begin{bmatrix}1&-1&1&3\0&3&1&3\0&3&1&b-6end{bmatrix}rightsquigarrow
                    begin{bmatrix}1&-1&1&3\0&3&1&3\0&0&0&b-9end{bmatrix} $$

                    Thus, for $a=-1$, the augmented matrix has rank $3$ if and only if $b-9ne 0$.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered Jan 2 at 22:24









                    Bernard

                    118k639112




                    118k639112























                        0














                        Rewrite the system as:
                        $$
                        AX=B
                        $$

                        where $X=(x,y,z)^t$, $B=(3,6,b)^t$ and
                        $$A = begin{bmatrix}
                        1 & a & 1 \
                        1 & 2 & 2 \
                        1 & 5 & 3
                        end{bmatrix}$$



                        First you must have $det(A)=0$ which after calculations give $a=-1$.
                        So the system becomes:



                        $$A = begin{bmatrix}
                        1 & -1 & 1 \
                        1 & 2 & 2 \
                        1 & 5 & 3
                        end{bmatrix}$$



                        Now, row 3 becomes all zero when $r_3rightarrow r_3-2r_2+r_1$. Applying this to the augmented matrix $[A|B]$ gives the $(3,4)$ entry to be:
                        $$
                        b-9
                        $$



                        It is required that this entry is nonzero in order to have an inconsistent matrix.
                        Thus, $a=-1, bneq 9$.






                        share|cite|improve this answer


























                          0














                          Rewrite the system as:
                          $$
                          AX=B
                          $$

                          where $X=(x,y,z)^t$, $B=(3,6,b)^t$ and
                          $$A = begin{bmatrix}
                          1 & a & 1 \
                          1 & 2 & 2 \
                          1 & 5 & 3
                          end{bmatrix}$$



                          First you must have $det(A)=0$ which after calculations give $a=-1$.
                          So the system becomes:



                          $$A = begin{bmatrix}
                          1 & -1 & 1 \
                          1 & 2 & 2 \
                          1 & 5 & 3
                          end{bmatrix}$$



                          Now, row 3 becomes all zero when $r_3rightarrow r_3-2r_2+r_1$. Applying this to the augmented matrix $[A|B]$ gives the $(3,4)$ entry to be:
                          $$
                          b-9
                          $$



                          It is required that this entry is nonzero in order to have an inconsistent matrix.
                          Thus, $a=-1, bneq 9$.






                          share|cite|improve this answer
























                            0












                            0








                            0






                            Rewrite the system as:
                            $$
                            AX=B
                            $$

                            where $X=(x,y,z)^t$, $B=(3,6,b)^t$ and
                            $$A = begin{bmatrix}
                            1 & a & 1 \
                            1 & 2 & 2 \
                            1 & 5 & 3
                            end{bmatrix}$$



                            First you must have $det(A)=0$ which after calculations give $a=-1$.
                            So the system becomes:



                            $$A = begin{bmatrix}
                            1 & -1 & 1 \
                            1 & 2 & 2 \
                            1 & 5 & 3
                            end{bmatrix}$$



                            Now, row 3 becomes all zero when $r_3rightarrow r_3-2r_2+r_1$. Applying this to the augmented matrix $[A|B]$ gives the $(3,4)$ entry to be:
                            $$
                            b-9
                            $$



                            It is required that this entry is nonzero in order to have an inconsistent matrix.
                            Thus, $a=-1, bneq 9$.






                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            Rewrite the system as:
                            $$
                            AX=B
                            $$

                            where $X=(x,y,z)^t$, $B=(3,6,b)^t$ and
                            $$A = begin{bmatrix}
                            1 & a & 1 \
                            1 & 2 & 2 \
                            1 & 5 & 3
                            end{bmatrix}$$



                            First you must have $det(A)=0$ which after calculations give $a=-1$.
                            So the system becomes:



                            $$A = begin{bmatrix}
                            1 & -1 & 1 \
                            1 & 2 & 2 \
                            1 & 5 & 3
                            end{bmatrix}$$



                            Now, row 3 becomes all zero when $r_3rightarrow r_3-2r_2+r_1$. Applying this to the augmented matrix $[A|B]$ gives the $(3,4)$ entry to be:
                            $$
                            b-9
                            $$



                            It is required that this entry is nonzero in order to have an inconsistent matrix.
                            Thus, $a=-1, bneq 9$.







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered Jan 2 at 22:27









                            Test123

                            2,762828




                            2,762828






























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded




















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                                Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                                Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060025%2fsystem-of-equations-has-no-solution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                "Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

                                Alcedinidae

                                RAC Tourist Trophy