Data science related funny quotes












31














It has been customary for the users of different communities to quote funny things about their fields. It may be fun to share your funny things about Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Data Science and the things that you face every day!










share|improve this question




















  • 1




    Not quite data science, as it's more data management & archiving, but see youtube.com/watch?v=N2zK3sAtr-4
    – Joe
    Dec 15 '18 at 23:36






  • 3




    I like this, but really, does this belong here? Maybe it's better off on the Meta.
    – Mr Lister
    Dec 16 '18 at 14:55






  • 1




    @MrLister as I've mentioned, you can see this post in other comunities too. It has been just for fun :) don't take that seriously. On the other hand I don't think it is off topic. It is about datascience, isn't it?
    – Media
    Dec 16 '18 at 15:03








  • 1




    related: stats.stackexchange.com/questions/1337/statistics-jokes and stats.stackexchange.com/questions/423/…
    – moooeeeep
    Dec 17 '18 at 7:30








  • 1




    How many epochs will we need to find ourselves in an epoch (Hellenic meaning), where the machine learning algorithm can make good jokes, to post here?
    – gsamaras
    Dec 18 '18 at 10:45


















31














It has been customary for the users of different communities to quote funny things about their fields. It may be fun to share your funny things about Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Data Science and the things that you face every day!










share|improve this question




















  • 1




    Not quite data science, as it's more data management & archiving, but see youtube.com/watch?v=N2zK3sAtr-4
    – Joe
    Dec 15 '18 at 23:36






  • 3




    I like this, but really, does this belong here? Maybe it's better off on the Meta.
    – Mr Lister
    Dec 16 '18 at 14:55






  • 1




    @MrLister as I've mentioned, you can see this post in other comunities too. It has been just for fun :) don't take that seriously. On the other hand I don't think it is off topic. It is about datascience, isn't it?
    – Media
    Dec 16 '18 at 15:03








  • 1




    related: stats.stackexchange.com/questions/1337/statistics-jokes and stats.stackexchange.com/questions/423/…
    – moooeeeep
    Dec 17 '18 at 7:30








  • 1




    How many epochs will we need to find ourselves in an epoch (Hellenic meaning), where the machine learning algorithm can make good jokes, to post here?
    – gsamaras
    Dec 18 '18 at 10:45
















31












31








31


10





It has been customary for the users of different communities to quote funny things about their fields. It may be fun to share your funny things about Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Data Science and the things that you face every day!










share|improve this question















It has been customary for the users of different communities to quote funny things about their fields. It may be fun to share your funny things about Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Data Science and the things that you face every day!







machine-learning neural-network deep-learning humor






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Dec 18 '18 at 8:23


























community wiki





5 revs, 2 users 70%
Media









  • 1




    Not quite data science, as it's more data management & archiving, but see youtube.com/watch?v=N2zK3sAtr-4
    – Joe
    Dec 15 '18 at 23:36






  • 3




    I like this, but really, does this belong here? Maybe it's better off on the Meta.
    – Mr Lister
    Dec 16 '18 at 14:55






  • 1




    @MrLister as I've mentioned, you can see this post in other comunities too. It has been just for fun :) don't take that seriously. On the other hand I don't think it is off topic. It is about datascience, isn't it?
    – Media
    Dec 16 '18 at 15:03








  • 1




    related: stats.stackexchange.com/questions/1337/statistics-jokes and stats.stackexchange.com/questions/423/…
    – moooeeeep
    Dec 17 '18 at 7:30








  • 1




    How many epochs will we need to find ourselves in an epoch (Hellenic meaning), where the machine learning algorithm can make good jokes, to post here?
    – gsamaras
    Dec 18 '18 at 10:45
















  • 1




    Not quite data science, as it's more data management & archiving, but see youtube.com/watch?v=N2zK3sAtr-4
    – Joe
    Dec 15 '18 at 23:36






  • 3




    I like this, but really, does this belong here? Maybe it's better off on the Meta.
    – Mr Lister
    Dec 16 '18 at 14:55






  • 1




    @MrLister as I've mentioned, you can see this post in other comunities too. It has been just for fun :) don't take that seriously. On the other hand I don't think it is off topic. It is about datascience, isn't it?
    – Media
    Dec 16 '18 at 15:03








  • 1




    related: stats.stackexchange.com/questions/1337/statistics-jokes and stats.stackexchange.com/questions/423/…
    – moooeeeep
    Dec 17 '18 at 7:30








  • 1




    How many epochs will we need to find ourselves in an epoch (Hellenic meaning), where the machine learning algorithm can make good jokes, to post here?
    – gsamaras
    Dec 18 '18 at 10:45










1




1




Not quite data science, as it's more data management & archiving, but see youtube.com/watch?v=N2zK3sAtr-4
– Joe
Dec 15 '18 at 23:36




Not quite data science, as it's more data management & archiving, but see youtube.com/watch?v=N2zK3sAtr-4
– Joe
Dec 15 '18 at 23:36




3




3




I like this, but really, does this belong here? Maybe it's better off on the Meta.
– Mr Lister
Dec 16 '18 at 14:55




I like this, but really, does this belong here? Maybe it's better off on the Meta.
– Mr Lister
Dec 16 '18 at 14:55




1




1




@MrLister as I've mentioned, you can see this post in other comunities too. It has been just for fun :) don't take that seriously. On the other hand I don't think it is off topic. It is about datascience, isn't it?
– Media
Dec 16 '18 at 15:03






@MrLister as I've mentioned, you can see this post in other comunities too. It has been just for fun :) don't take that seriously. On the other hand I don't think it is off topic. It is about datascience, isn't it?
– Media
Dec 16 '18 at 15:03






1




1




related: stats.stackexchange.com/questions/1337/statistics-jokes and stats.stackexchange.com/questions/423/…
– moooeeeep
Dec 17 '18 at 7:30






related: stats.stackexchange.com/questions/1337/statistics-jokes and stats.stackexchange.com/questions/423/…
– moooeeeep
Dec 17 '18 at 7:30






1




1




How many epochs will we need to find ourselves in an epoch (Hellenic meaning), where the machine learning algorithm can make good jokes, to post here?
– gsamaras
Dec 18 '18 at 10:45






How many epochs will we need to find ourselves in an epoch (Hellenic meaning), where the machine learning algorithm can make good jokes, to post here?
– gsamaras
Dec 18 '18 at 10:45












13 Answers
13






active

oldest

votes


















37














Q: How many machine learning specialists does it take to change a light bulb?



A: Just one, but they require a million light bulbs to train properly.



Q: How many machine learning specialists does it take to change a fluorescent light bulb?



A: That wasn't in the training data!






share|improve this answer



















  • 5




    I usually find light bulb jokes boring, but this one is cool :D
    – Jérémy Blain
    Dec 14 '18 at 15:38






  • 2




    @JérémyBlain All the other light bulb jokes were training - we now have to rerun them with this as a model.
    – Lio Elbammalf
    Dec 18 '18 at 14:19



















29














Neural Network are not black boxes. They are a big pile of linear algebra :



https://xkcd.com/1838/



image from xkcd






share|improve this answer



















  • 1




    Ah, yes, there is xkcd about everything!
    – val
    Dec 14 '18 at 20:47



















13















  1. If you torture data long enough, it will tell you whatever you want to hear.


  2. Statistics shows that statistics cannot be trusted.







share|improve this answer























  • So laconic and true!
    – gsamaras
    Dec 18 '18 at 10:39



















11














Frequentists vs. Bayesians



Frequentists vs. Bayesians – xkcd



Transcript:




Did the sun just explode?

(It's night, so we're not sure)



[[Two statisticians stand alongside an adorable little computer that is suspiciously similar to K-9 that speaks in Westminster typeface]]
Frequentist Statistician: This neutrino detector measures whether the sun has gone nova.
Bayesian Statistician: Then, it rolls two dice. If they both come up as six, it lies to us. Otherwise, it tells the truth.
FS: Let's try. [[to the detector]] Detector! Has the sun gone nova?
Detector: <<roll>> YES.



Frequentist Statistician:
FS: The probability of this result happening by chance is $frac1{36}=0.027$. Since $p< 0.05$, I conclude that the sun has exploded.



Bayesian Statistician:
BS: Bet you $50 it hasn't.




Title text:




'Detector! What would the Bayesian statistician say if I asked him whether the–' [roll] 'I AM A NEUTRINO DETECTOR, NOT A LABYRINTH GUARD. SERIOUSLY, DID YOUR BRAIN FALL OUT?' [roll] '... yes.'







share|improve this answer































    11














    I find this funny because it's true.



    enter image description here



    source





    Cute funny...



    enter image description here





    This one always cracks me up for no reason...



    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer



















    • 1




      But but but, the bar with the large uncertainty is the only one I trust. Who would trust someone who claims to be absolutely sure of everything, rather than the one who rightly puts in a realistic level of uncertainty?
      – gerrit
      Dec 16 '18 at 12:41










    • The first one is a twist on XKCD #303 without reference to the source.
      – molnarm
      Dec 18 '18 at 11:06



















    9














    enter image description here



    ​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​






    share|improve this answer























    • cursed machine learning.
      – wacax
      Dec 17 '18 at 2:55



















    7














    enter image description here



    Unsure whether they qualify, but there are some fun facts taken from various sources:



    Beginning from Yann Lecun:




    • Geoff Hinton doesn't need to make hidden units. They hide by
      themselves when he approaches.


    • Geoff Hinton doesn't disagree with you, he contrastively diverges

      (from Vincent Vanhoucke)


    • Shakespeare and Bayes are in a boat, fishing. Bayes is trying to figure out which net to cast when Shakespeare says:
      "loopy or not loopy? that is the question".


    • Deep Belief Nets actually believe deeply in Geoff Hinton.


    • Geoff Hinton discovered how the brain really works. Once a year for

      the last 25 years.



    • Bayesians are the only people who can feel marginalized after being integrated



      And now the legend:



      enter image description here




    One from Reddit:



    YOLO: you only LEARN once



    P.S: Ian Goodfellow and Jurgen Schmidhuber are co-authoring a paper (to be presented at NIPS 2019) on Inverse GANs (More jokes on the topic here)






    share|improve this answer































      6














      Trump



      Let me embrace thee, sour adversity, for wise men say it is the wisest course.



      Yann Le Trump! 😂😂😂






      share|improve this answer































        5














        Question: What's the different between machine learning and AI?



        Answer:



        If it's written in Python, then it's probably machine learning.



        If it's written in PowerPoint, then it's probably AI.






        share|improve this answer































          4














          A Machine Learning algorithm walks into a bar.



          The bartender asks, "What'll you have?"



          The algorithm says, "What's everyone else having?"






          share|improve this answer































            3














            A: What is machine learning sir?
            B: It is not machine learning! It is machine burning, man.





            enter image description here



            by Davide Mazzini






            share|improve this answer































              3














              "Predictions are hard -- especially about the future."



              (Yogi Berra or Neils Bohr, depending whether you prefer physics or baseball)






              share|improve this answer































                2














                In 2006, a common joke was that you would get an award for writing a paper that would either have "Karl Marx" or "Neural Network" in the title and get accepted at NIPS. Now that's become the standard for the latter... :D






                share|improve this answer






















                  protected by Media Dec 19 '18 at 13:40



                  Thank you for your interest in this question.
                  Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



                  Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?














                  13 Answers
                  13






                  active

                  oldest

                  votes








                  13 Answers
                  13






                  active

                  oldest

                  votes









                  active

                  oldest

                  votes






                  active

                  oldest

                  votes









                  37














                  Q: How many machine learning specialists does it take to change a light bulb?



                  A: Just one, but they require a million light bulbs to train properly.



                  Q: How many machine learning specialists does it take to change a fluorescent light bulb?



                  A: That wasn't in the training data!






                  share|improve this answer



















                  • 5




                    I usually find light bulb jokes boring, but this one is cool :D
                    – Jérémy Blain
                    Dec 14 '18 at 15:38






                  • 2




                    @JérémyBlain All the other light bulb jokes were training - we now have to rerun them with this as a model.
                    – Lio Elbammalf
                    Dec 18 '18 at 14:19
















                  37














                  Q: How many machine learning specialists does it take to change a light bulb?



                  A: Just one, but they require a million light bulbs to train properly.



                  Q: How many machine learning specialists does it take to change a fluorescent light bulb?



                  A: That wasn't in the training data!






                  share|improve this answer



















                  • 5




                    I usually find light bulb jokes boring, but this one is cool :D
                    – Jérémy Blain
                    Dec 14 '18 at 15:38






                  • 2




                    @JérémyBlain All the other light bulb jokes were training - we now have to rerun them with this as a model.
                    – Lio Elbammalf
                    Dec 18 '18 at 14:19














                  37












                  37








                  37






                  Q: How many machine learning specialists does it take to change a light bulb?



                  A: Just one, but they require a million light bulbs to train properly.



                  Q: How many machine learning specialists does it take to change a fluorescent light bulb?



                  A: That wasn't in the training data!






                  share|improve this answer














                  Q: How many machine learning specialists does it take to change a light bulb?



                  A: Just one, but they require a million light bulbs to train properly.



                  Q: How many machine learning specialists does it take to change a fluorescent light bulb?



                  A: That wasn't in the training data!







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  answered Dec 14 '18 at 15:31


























                  community wiki





                  Nuclear Wang









                  • 5




                    I usually find light bulb jokes boring, but this one is cool :D
                    – Jérémy Blain
                    Dec 14 '18 at 15:38






                  • 2




                    @JérémyBlain All the other light bulb jokes were training - we now have to rerun them with this as a model.
                    – Lio Elbammalf
                    Dec 18 '18 at 14:19














                  • 5




                    I usually find light bulb jokes boring, but this one is cool :D
                    – Jérémy Blain
                    Dec 14 '18 at 15:38






                  • 2




                    @JérémyBlain All the other light bulb jokes were training - we now have to rerun them with this as a model.
                    – Lio Elbammalf
                    Dec 18 '18 at 14:19








                  5




                  5




                  I usually find light bulb jokes boring, but this one is cool :D
                  – Jérémy Blain
                  Dec 14 '18 at 15:38




                  I usually find light bulb jokes boring, but this one is cool :D
                  – Jérémy Blain
                  Dec 14 '18 at 15:38




                  2




                  2




                  @JérémyBlain All the other light bulb jokes were training - we now have to rerun them with this as a model.
                  – Lio Elbammalf
                  Dec 18 '18 at 14:19




                  @JérémyBlain All the other light bulb jokes were training - we now have to rerun them with this as a model.
                  – Lio Elbammalf
                  Dec 18 '18 at 14:19











                  29














                  Neural Network are not black boxes. They are a big pile of linear algebra :



                  https://xkcd.com/1838/



                  image from xkcd






                  share|improve this answer



















                  • 1




                    Ah, yes, there is xkcd about everything!
                    – val
                    Dec 14 '18 at 20:47
















                  29














                  Neural Network are not black boxes. They are a big pile of linear algebra :



                  https://xkcd.com/1838/



                  image from xkcd






                  share|improve this answer



















                  • 1




                    Ah, yes, there is xkcd about everything!
                    – val
                    Dec 14 '18 at 20:47














                  29












                  29








                  29






                  Neural Network are not black boxes. They are a big pile of linear algebra :



                  https://xkcd.com/1838/



                  image from xkcd






                  share|improve this answer














                  Neural Network are not black boxes. They are a big pile of linear algebra :



                  https://xkcd.com/1838/



                  image from xkcd







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  answered Dec 14 '18 at 15:01


























                  community wiki





                  Jérémy Blain









                  • 1




                    Ah, yes, there is xkcd about everything!
                    – val
                    Dec 14 '18 at 20:47














                  • 1




                    Ah, yes, there is xkcd about everything!
                    – val
                    Dec 14 '18 at 20:47








                  1




                  1




                  Ah, yes, there is xkcd about everything!
                  – val
                  Dec 14 '18 at 20:47




                  Ah, yes, there is xkcd about everything!
                  – val
                  Dec 14 '18 at 20:47











                  13















                  1. If you torture data long enough, it will tell you whatever you want to hear.


                  2. Statistics shows that statistics cannot be trusted.







                  share|improve this answer























                  • So laconic and true!
                    – gsamaras
                    Dec 18 '18 at 10:39
















                  13















                  1. If you torture data long enough, it will tell you whatever you want to hear.


                  2. Statistics shows that statistics cannot be trusted.







                  share|improve this answer























                  • So laconic and true!
                    – gsamaras
                    Dec 18 '18 at 10:39














                  13












                  13








                  13







                  1. If you torture data long enough, it will tell you whatever you want to hear.


                  2. Statistics shows that statistics cannot be trusted.







                  share|improve this answer















                  1. If you torture data long enough, it will tell you whatever you want to hear.


                  2. Statistics shows that statistics cannot be trusted.








                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited Dec 18 '18 at 15:06


























                  community wiki





                  2 revs
                  sds













                  • So laconic and true!
                    – gsamaras
                    Dec 18 '18 at 10:39


















                  • So laconic and true!
                    – gsamaras
                    Dec 18 '18 at 10:39
















                  So laconic and true!
                  – gsamaras
                  Dec 18 '18 at 10:39




                  So laconic and true!
                  – gsamaras
                  Dec 18 '18 at 10:39











                  11














                  Frequentists vs. Bayesians



                  Frequentists vs. Bayesians – xkcd



                  Transcript:




                  Did the sun just explode?

                  (It's night, so we're not sure)



                  [[Two statisticians stand alongside an adorable little computer that is suspiciously similar to K-9 that speaks in Westminster typeface]]
                  Frequentist Statistician: This neutrino detector measures whether the sun has gone nova.
                  Bayesian Statistician: Then, it rolls two dice. If they both come up as six, it lies to us. Otherwise, it tells the truth.
                  FS: Let's try. [[to the detector]] Detector! Has the sun gone nova?
                  Detector: <<roll>> YES.



                  Frequentist Statistician:
                  FS: The probability of this result happening by chance is $frac1{36}=0.027$. Since $p< 0.05$, I conclude that the sun has exploded.



                  Bayesian Statistician:
                  BS: Bet you $50 it hasn't.




                  Title text:




                  'Detector! What would the Bayesian statistician say if I asked him whether the–' [roll] 'I AM A NEUTRINO DETECTOR, NOT A LABYRINTH GUARD. SERIOUSLY, DID YOUR BRAIN FALL OUT?' [roll] '... yes.'







                  share|improve this answer




























                    11














                    Frequentists vs. Bayesians



                    Frequentists vs. Bayesians – xkcd



                    Transcript:




                    Did the sun just explode?

                    (It's night, so we're not sure)



                    [[Two statisticians stand alongside an adorable little computer that is suspiciously similar to K-9 that speaks in Westminster typeface]]
                    Frequentist Statistician: This neutrino detector measures whether the sun has gone nova.
                    Bayesian Statistician: Then, it rolls two dice. If they both come up as six, it lies to us. Otherwise, it tells the truth.
                    FS: Let's try. [[to the detector]] Detector! Has the sun gone nova?
                    Detector: <<roll>> YES.



                    Frequentist Statistician:
                    FS: The probability of this result happening by chance is $frac1{36}=0.027$. Since $p< 0.05$, I conclude that the sun has exploded.



                    Bayesian Statistician:
                    BS: Bet you $50 it hasn't.




                    Title text:




                    'Detector! What would the Bayesian statistician say if I asked him whether the–' [roll] 'I AM A NEUTRINO DETECTOR, NOT A LABYRINTH GUARD. SERIOUSLY, DID YOUR BRAIN FALL OUT?' [roll] '... yes.'







                    share|improve this answer


























                      11












                      11








                      11






                      Frequentists vs. Bayesians



                      Frequentists vs. Bayesians – xkcd



                      Transcript:




                      Did the sun just explode?

                      (It's night, so we're not sure)



                      [[Two statisticians stand alongside an adorable little computer that is suspiciously similar to K-9 that speaks in Westminster typeface]]
                      Frequentist Statistician: This neutrino detector measures whether the sun has gone nova.
                      Bayesian Statistician: Then, it rolls two dice. If they both come up as six, it lies to us. Otherwise, it tells the truth.
                      FS: Let's try. [[to the detector]] Detector! Has the sun gone nova?
                      Detector: <<roll>> YES.



                      Frequentist Statistician:
                      FS: The probability of this result happening by chance is $frac1{36}=0.027$. Since $p< 0.05$, I conclude that the sun has exploded.



                      Bayesian Statistician:
                      BS: Bet you $50 it hasn't.




                      Title text:




                      'Detector! What would the Bayesian statistician say if I asked him whether the–' [roll] 'I AM A NEUTRINO DETECTOR, NOT A LABYRINTH GUARD. SERIOUSLY, DID YOUR BRAIN FALL OUT?' [roll] '... yes.'







                      share|improve this answer














                      Frequentists vs. Bayesians



                      Frequentists vs. Bayesians – xkcd



                      Transcript:




                      Did the sun just explode?

                      (It's night, so we're not sure)



                      [[Two statisticians stand alongside an adorable little computer that is suspiciously similar to K-9 that speaks in Westminster typeface]]
                      Frequentist Statistician: This neutrino detector measures whether the sun has gone nova.
                      Bayesian Statistician: Then, it rolls two dice. If they both come up as six, it lies to us. Otherwise, it tells the truth.
                      FS: Let's try. [[to the detector]] Detector! Has the sun gone nova?
                      Detector: <<roll>> YES.



                      Frequentist Statistician:
                      FS: The probability of this result happening by chance is $frac1{36}=0.027$. Since $p< 0.05$, I conclude that the sun has exploded.



                      Bayesian Statistician:
                      BS: Bet you $50 it hasn't.




                      Title text:




                      'Detector! What would the Bayesian statistician say if I asked him whether the–' [roll] 'I AM A NEUTRINO DETECTOR, NOT A LABYRINTH GUARD. SERIOUSLY, DID YOUR BRAIN FALL OUT?' [roll] '... yes.'








                      share|improve this answer














                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      answered Dec 15 '18 at 21:21


























                      community wiki





                      wizzwizz4
























                          11














                          I find this funny because it's true.



                          enter image description here



                          source





                          Cute funny...



                          enter image description here





                          This one always cracks me up for no reason...



                          enter image description here






                          share|improve this answer



















                          • 1




                            But but but, the bar with the large uncertainty is the only one I trust. Who would trust someone who claims to be absolutely sure of everything, rather than the one who rightly puts in a realistic level of uncertainty?
                            – gerrit
                            Dec 16 '18 at 12:41










                          • The first one is a twist on XKCD #303 without reference to the source.
                            – molnarm
                            Dec 18 '18 at 11:06
















                          11














                          I find this funny because it's true.



                          enter image description here



                          source





                          Cute funny...



                          enter image description here





                          This one always cracks me up for no reason...



                          enter image description here






                          share|improve this answer



















                          • 1




                            But but but, the bar with the large uncertainty is the only one I trust. Who would trust someone who claims to be absolutely sure of everything, rather than the one who rightly puts in a realistic level of uncertainty?
                            – gerrit
                            Dec 16 '18 at 12:41










                          • The first one is a twist on XKCD #303 without reference to the source.
                            – molnarm
                            Dec 18 '18 at 11:06














                          11












                          11








                          11






                          I find this funny because it's true.



                          enter image description here



                          source





                          Cute funny...



                          enter image description here





                          This one always cracks me up for no reason...



                          enter image description here






                          share|improve this answer














                          I find this funny because it's true.



                          enter image description here



                          source





                          Cute funny...



                          enter image description here





                          This one always cracks me up for no reason...



                          enter image description here







                          share|improve this answer














                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer








                          edited Dec 18 '18 at 15:53


























                          community wiki





                          2 revs
                          BrunoGL









                          • 1




                            But but but, the bar with the large uncertainty is the only one I trust. Who would trust someone who claims to be absolutely sure of everything, rather than the one who rightly puts in a realistic level of uncertainty?
                            – gerrit
                            Dec 16 '18 at 12:41










                          • The first one is a twist on XKCD #303 without reference to the source.
                            – molnarm
                            Dec 18 '18 at 11:06














                          • 1




                            But but but, the bar with the large uncertainty is the only one I trust. Who would trust someone who claims to be absolutely sure of everything, rather than the one who rightly puts in a realistic level of uncertainty?
                            – gerrit
                            Dec 16 '18 at 12:41










                          • The first one is a twist on XKCD #303 without reference to the source.
                            – molnarm
                            Dec 18 '18 at 11:06








                          1




                          1




                          But but but, the bar with the large uncertainty is the only one I trust. Who would trust someone who claims to be absolutely sure of everything, rather than the one who rightly puts in a realistic level of uncertainty?
                          – gerrit
                          Dec 16 '18 at 12:41




                          But but but, the bar with the large uncertainty is the only one I trust. Who would trust someone who claims to be absolutely sure of everything, rather than the one who rightly puts in a realistic level of uncertainty?
                          – gerrit
                          Dec 16 '18 at 12:41












                          The first one is a twist on XKCD #303 without reference to the source.
                          – molnarm
                          Dec 18 '18 at 11:06




                          The first one is a twist on XKCD #303 without reference to the source.
                          – molnarm
                          Dec 18 '18 at 11:06











                          9














                          enter image description here



                          ​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​






                          share|improve this answer























                          • cursed machine learning.
                            – wacax
                            Dec 17 '18 at 2:55
















                          9














                          enter image description here



                          ​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​






                          share|improve this answer























                          • cursed machine learning.
                            – wacax
                            Dec 17 '18 at 2:55














                          9












                          9








                          9






                          enter image description here



                          ​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​






                          share|improve this answer














                          enter image description here



                          ​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​







                          share|improve this answer














                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer








                          answered Dec 16 '18 at 15:09


























                          community wiki





                          Mr Lister













                          • cursed machine learning.
                            – wacax
                            Dec 17 '18 at 2:55


















                          • cursed machine learning.
                            – wacax
                            Dec 17 '18 at 2:55
















                          cursed machine learning.
                          – wacax
                          Dec 17 '18 at 2:55




                          cursed machine learning.
                          – wacax
                          Dec 17 '18 at 2:55











                          7














                          enter image description here



                          Unsure whether they qualify, but there are some fun facts taken from various sources:



                          Beginning from Yann Lecun:




                          • Geoff Hinton doesn't need to make hidden units. They hide by
                            themselves when he approaches.


                          • Geoff Hinton doesn't disagree with you, he contrastively diverges

                            (from Vincent Vanhoucke)


                          • Shakespeare and Bayes are in a boat, fishing. Bayes is trying to figure out which net to cast when Shakespeare says:
                            "loopy or not loopy? that is the question".


                          • Deep Belief Nets actually believe deeply in Geoff Hinton.


                          • Geoff Hinton discovered how the brain really works. Once a year for

                            the last 25 years.



                          • Bayesians are the only people who can feel marginalized after being integrated



                            And now the legend:



                            enter image description here




                          One from Reddit:



                          YOLO: you only LEARN once



                          P.S: Ian Goodfellow and Jurgen Schmidhuber are co-authoring a paper (to be presented at NIPS 2019) on Inverse GANs (More jokes on the topic here)






                          share|improve this answer




























                            7














                            enter image description here



                            Unsure whether they qualify, but there are some fun facts taken from various sources:



                            Beginning from Yann Lecun:




                            • Geoff Hinton doesn't need to make hidden units. They hide by
                              themselves when he approaches.


                            • Geoff Hinton doesn't disagree with you, he contrastively diverges

                              (from Vincent Vanhoucke)


                            • Shakespeare and Bayes are in a boat, fishing. Bayes is trying to figure out which net to cast when Shakespeare says:
                              "loopy or not loopy? that is the question".


                            • Deep Belief Nets actually believe deeply in Geoff Hinton.


                            • Geoff Hinton discovered how the brain really works. Once a year for

                              the last 25 years.



                            • Bayesians are the only people who can feel marginalized after being integrated



                              And now the legend:



                              enter image description here




                            One from Reddit:



                            YOLO: you only LEARN once



                            P.S: Ian Goodfellow and Jurgen Schmidhuber are co-authoring a paper (to be presented at NIPS 2019) on Inverse GANs (More jokes on the topic here)






                            share|improve this answer


























                              7












                              7








                              7






                              enter image description here



                              Unsure whether they qualify, but there are some fun facts taken from various sources:



                              Beginning from Yann Lecun:




                              • Geoff Hinton doesn't need to make hidden units. They hide by
                                themselves when he approaches.


                              • Geoff Hinton doesn't disagree with you, he contrastively diverges

                                (from Vincent Vanhoucke)


                              • Shakespeare and Bayes are in a boat, fishing. Bayes is trying to figure out which net to cast when Shakespeare says:
                                "loopy or not loopy? that is the question".


                              • Deep Belief Nets actually believe deeply in Geoff Hinton.


                              • Geoff Hinton discovered how the brain really works. Once a year for

                                the last 25 years.



                              • Bayesians are the only people who can feel marginalized after being integrated



                                And now the legend:



                                enter image description here




                              One from Reddit:



                              YOLO: you only LEARN once



                              P.S: Ian Goodfellow and Jurgen Schmidhuber are co-authoring a paper (to be presented at NIPS 2019) on Inverse GANs (More jokes on the topic here)






                              share|improve this answer














                              enter image description here



                              Unsure whether they qualify, but there are some fun facts taken from various sources:



                              Beginning from Yann Lecun:




                              • Geoff Hinton doesn't need to make hidden units. They hide by
                                themselves when he approaches.


                              • Geoff Hinton doesn't disagree with you, he contrastively diverges

                                (from Vincent Vanhoucke)


                              • Shakespeare and Bayes are in a boat, fishing. Bayes is trying to figure out which net to cast when Shakespeare says:
                                "loopy or not loopy? that is the question".


                              • Deep Belief Nets actually believe deeply in Geoff Hinton.


                              • Geoff Hinton discovered how the brain really works. Once a year for

                                the last 25 years.



                              • Bayesians are the only people who can feel marginalized after being integrated



                                And now the legend:



                                enter image description here




                              One from Reddit:



                              YOLO: you only LEARN once



                              P.S: Ian Goodfellow and Jurgen Schmidhuber are co-authoring a paper (to be presented at NIPS 2019) on Inverse GANs (More jokes on the topic here)







                              share|improve this answer














                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer








                              answered Dec 16 '18 at 8:41


























                              community wiki





                              Failed Scientist
























                                  6














                                  Trump



                                  Let me embrace thee, sour adversity, for wise men say it is the wisest course.



                                  Yann Le Trump! 😂😂😂






                                  share|improve this answer




























                                    6














                                    Trump



                                    Let me embrace thee, sour adversity, for wise men say it is the wisest course.



                                    Yann Le Trump! 😂😂😂






                                    share|improve this answer


























                                      6












                                      6








                                      6






                                      Trump



                                      Let me embrace thee, sour adversity, for wise men say it is the wisest course.



                                      Yann Le Trump! 😂😂😂






                                      share|improve this answer














                                      Trump



                                      Let me embrace thee, sour adversity, for wise men say it is the wisest course.



                                      Yann Le Trump! 😂😂😂







                                      share|improve this answer














                                      share|improve this answer



                                      share|improve this answer








                                      answered Dec 18 '18 at 11:35


























                                      community wiki





                                      TitoOrt
























                                          5














                                          Question: What's the different between machine learning and AI?



                                          Answer:



                                          If it's written in Python, then it's probably machine learning.



                                          If it's written in PowerPoint, then it's probably AI.






                                          share|improve this answer




























                                            5














                                            Question: What's the different between machine learning and AI?



                                            Answer:



                                            If it's written in Python, then it's probably machine learning.



                                            If it's written in PowerPoint, then it's probably AI.






                                            share|improve this answer


























                                              5












                                              5








                                              5






                                              Question: What's the different between machine learning and AI?



                                              Answer:



                                              If it's written in Python, then it's probably machine learning.



                                              If it's written in PowerPoint, then it's probably AI.






                                              share|improve this answer














                                              Question: What's the different between machine learning and AI?



                                              Answer:



                                              If it's written in Python, then it's probably machine learning.



                                              If it's written in PowerPoint, then it's probably AI.







                                              share|improve this answer














                                              share|improve this answer



                                              share|improve this answer








                                              answered Dec 17 '18 at 4:47


























                                              community wiki





                                              iBug
























                                                  4














                                                  A Machine Learning algorithm walks into a bar.



                                                  The bartender asks, "What'll you have?"



                                                  The algorithm says, "What's everyone else having?"






                                                  share|improve this answer




























                                                    4














                                                    A Machine Learning algorithm walks into a bar.



                                                    The bartender asks, "What'll you have?"



                                                    The algorithm says, "What's everyone else having?"






                                                    share|improve this answer


























                                                      4












                                                      4








                                                      4






                                                      A Machine Learning algorithm walks into a bar.



                                                      The bartender asks, "What'll you have?"



                                                      The algorithm says, "What's everyone else having?"






                                                      share|improve this answer














                                                      A Machine Learning algorithm walks into a bar.



                                                      The bartender asks, "What'll you have?"



                                                      The algorithm says, "What's everyone else having?"







                                                      share|improve this answer














                                                      share|improve this answer



                                                      share|improve this answer








                                                      answered Dec 18 '18 at 10:41


























                                                      community wiki





                                                      gsamaras
























                                                          3














                                                          A: What is machine learning sir?
                                                          B: It is not machine learning! It is machine burning, man.





                                                          enter image description here



                                                          by Davide Mazzini






                                                          share|improve this answer




























                                                            3














                                                            A: What is machine learning sir?
                                                            B: It is not machine learning! It is machine burning, man.





                                                            enter image description here



                                                            by Davide Mazzini






                                                            share|improve this answer


























                                                              3












                                                              3








                                                              3






                                                              A: What is machine learning sir?
                                                              B: It is not machine learning! It is machine burning, man.





                                                              enter image description here



                                                              by Davide Mazzini






                                                              share|improve this answer














                                                              A: What is machine learning sir?
                                                              B: It is not machine learning! It is machine burning, man.





                                                              enter image description here



                                                              by Davide Mazzini







                                                              share|improve this answer














                                                              share|improve this answer



                                                              share|improve this answer








                                                              edited Dec 14 '18 at 20:17


























                                                              community wiki





                                                              Media
























                                                                  3














                                                                  "Predictions are hard -- especially about the future."



                                                                  (Yogi Berra or Neils Bohr, depending whether you prefer physics or baseball)






                                                                  share|improve this answer




























                                                                    3














                                                                    "Predictions are hard -- especially about the future."



                                                                    (Yogi Berra or Neils Bohr, depending whether you prefer physics or baseball)






                                                                    share|improve this answer


























                                                                      3












                                                                      3








                                                                      3






                                                                      "Predictions are hard -- especially about the future."



                                                                      (Yogi Berra or Neils Bohr, depending whether you prefer physics or baseball)






                                                                      share|improve this answer














                                                                      "Predictions are hard -- especially about the future."



                                                                      (Yogi Berra or Neils Bohr, depending whether you prefer physics or baseball)







                                                                      share|improve this answer














                                                                      share|improve this answer



                                                                      share|improve this answer








                                                                      answered Dec 17 '18 at 4:31


























                                                                      community wiki





                                                                      jkf
























                                                                          2














                                                                          In 2006, a common joke was that you would get an award for writing a paper that would either have "Karl Marx" or "Neural Network" in the title and get accepted at NIPS. Now that's become the standard for the latter... :D






                                                                          share|improve this answer




























                                                                            2














                                                                            In 2006, a common joke was that you would get an award for writing a paper that would either have "Karl Marx" or "Neural Network" in the title and get accepted at NIPS. Now that's become the standard for the latter... :D






                                                                            share|improve this answer


























                                                                              2












                                                                              2








                                                                              2






                                                                              In 2006, a common joke was that you would get an award for writing a paper that would either have "Karl Marx" or "Neural Network" in the title and get accepted at NIPS. Now that's become the standard for the latter... :D






                                                                              share|improve this answer














                                                                              In 2006, a common joke was that you would get an award for writing a paper that would either have "Karl Marx" or "Neural Network" in the title and get accepted at NIPS. Now that's become the standard for the latter... :D







                                                                              share|improve this answer














                                                                              share|improve this answer



                                                                              share|improve this answer








                                                                              answered Dec 16 '18 at 22:48


























                                                                              community wiki





                                                                              J. Reinhard


















                                                                                  protected by Media Dec 19 '18 at 13:40



                                                                                  Thank you for your interest in this question.
                                                                                  Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



                                                                                  Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?



                                                                                  Popular posts from this blog

                                                                                  "Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

                                                                                  Alcedinidae

                                                                                  RAC Tourist Trophy