Can we estimate the loss of entropy when applying a N-bit hash function to and N-bit random input?












3












$begingroup$


Someone pointed out recently to me that a cryptographic hash function " is not designed as a bijective mapping from N bit input to N bit output".



So if I feed an N-bit cryptographic hash function with N bits of random input, there's a loss of entropy between the input and output of the hash function.



Considering the md5 hash function, is there a way to estimate that loss of entropy? And is this loss cumulative so I could say, if I apply the hash function enough times, I end up with a 50% loss of entropy?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Sylvain Leroux is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of Entropy when iterating cryptographic hash functions. The only reason it might not be a duplicate is because this question asks about MD5 specifically.
    $endgroup$
    – Ella Rose
    9 hours ago
















3












$begingroup$


Someone pointed out recently to me that a cryptographic hash function " is not designed as a bijective mapping from N bit input to N bit output".



So if I feed an N-bit cryptographic hash function with N bits of random input, there's a loss of entropy between the input and output of the hash function.



Considering the md5 hash function, is there a way to estimate that loss of entropy? And is this loss cumulative so I could say, if I apply the hash function enough times, I end up with a 50% loss of entropy?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Sylvain Leroux is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of Entropy when iterating cryptographic hash functions. The only reason it might not be a duplicate is because this question asks about MD5 specifically.
    $endgroup$
    – Ella Rose
    9 hours ago














3












3








3





$begingroup$


Someone pointed out recently to me that a cryptographic hash function " is not designed as a bijective mapping from N bit input to N bit output".



So if I feed an N-bit cryptographic hash function with N bits of random input, there's a loss of entropy between the input and output of the hash function.



Considering the md5 hash function, is there a way to estimate that loss of entropy? And is this loss cumulative so I could say, if I apply the hash function enough times, I end up with a 50% loss of entropy?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Sylvain Leroux is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




Someone pointed out recently to me that a cryptographic hash function " is not designed as a bijective mapping from N bit input to N bit output".



So if I feed an N-bit cryptographic hash function with N bits of random input, there's a loss of entropy between the input and output of the hash function.



Considering the md5 hash function, is there a way to estimate that loss of entropy? And is this loss cumulative so I could say, if I apply the hash function enough times, I end up with a 50% loss of entropy?







hash entropy






share|improve this question









New contributor




Sylvain Leroux is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Sylvain Leroux is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 10 hours ago







Sylvain Leroux













New contributor




Sylvain Leroux is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 10 hours ago









Sylvain LerouxSylvain Leroux

1164




1164




New contributor




Sylvain Leroux is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Sylvain Leroux is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Sylvain Leroux is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of Entropy when iterating cryptographic hash functions. The only reason it might not be a duplicate is because this question asks about MD5 specifically.
    $endgroup$
    – Ella Rose
    9 hours ago














  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of Entropy when iterating cryptographic hash functions. The only reason it might not be a duplicate is because this question asks about MD5 specifically.
    $endgroup$
    – Ella Rose
    9 hours ago








3




3




$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of Entropy when iterating cryptographic hash functions. The only reason it might not be a duplicate is because this question asks about MD5 specifically.
$endgroup$
– Ella Rose
9 hours ago




$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of Entropy when iterating cryptographic hash functions. The only reason it might not be a duplicate is because this question asks about MD5 specifically.
$endgroup$
– Ella Rose
9 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

Actually, no. If it is a good Hash, you should roughly have $N-k$ bits of output entropy for some $k$ of much lower order than $N$.



The problem arises when the input is much longer than $N$ bits.



One way to estimate the entropy loss of such a Hash applied to $N$ bit inputs is to model it as a randomly chosen function on $N$ bits.
This was first done by Odlyzko and Flajolet. There is a nice review with updated results here



Let $tau_m$ be the image size of the $m$th iterate of the function. The entropy can be related to its behaviour.



If the function is a permutation, $tau_m=2^N$ for all $mgeq 1$ and there is no entropy loss.



Edit: See the comment and link by @fgrieu which is an estimate of what I called $tau_1.$ He is saying that
$$
tau_1approx 2^{128-0.8272cdots }
$$

for $N=128.$






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Is there any estimate for the $k$?
    $endgroup$
    – kelalaka
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Except for small $N$, the $k$ depends very little on $N$, and for $N=128$ is already very close to its asymptotic value $eta=displaystyle{1over e}sum_{j=1}^infty{j;log_2jover j!};;=0.8272dotstext{bit}$. See this.
    $endgroup$
    – fgrieu
    8 hours ago













Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "281"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});






Sylvain Leroux is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcrypto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f67217%2fcan-we-estimate-the-loss-of-entropy-when-applying-a-n-bit-hash-function-to-and-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3












$begingroup$

Actually, no. If it is a good Hash, you should roughly have $N-k$ bits of output entropy for some $k$ of much lower order than $N$.



The problem arises when the input is much longer than $N$ bits.



One way to estimate the entropy loss of such a Hash applied to $N$ bit inputs is to model it as a randomly chosen function on $N$ bits.
This was first done by Odlyzko and Flajolet. There is a nice review with updated results here



Let $tau_m$ be the image size of the $m$th iterate of the function. The entropy can be related to its behaviour.



If the function is a permutation, $tau_m=2^N$ for all $mgeq 1$ and there is no entropy loss.



Edit: See the comment and link by @fgrieu which is an estimate of what I called $tau_1.$ He is saying that
$$
tau_1approx 2^{128-0.8272cdots }
$$

for $N=128.$






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Is there any estimate for the $k$?
    $endgroup$
    – kelalaka
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Except for small $N$, the $k$ depends very little on $N$, and for $N=128$ is already very close to its asymptotic value $eta=displaystyle{1over e}sum_{j=1}^infty{j;log_2jover j!};;=0.8272dotstext{bit}$. See this.
    $endgroup$
    – fgrieu
    8 hours ago


















3












$begingroup$

Actually, no. If it is a good Hash, you should roughly have $N-k$ bits of output entropy for some $k$ of much lower order than $N$.



The problem arises when the input is much longer than $N$ bits.



One way to estimate the entropy loss of such a Hash applied to $N$ bit inputs is to model it as a randomly chosen function on $N$ bits.
This was first done by Odlyzko and Flajolet. There is a nice review with updated results here



Let $tau_m$ be the image size of the $m$th iterate of the function. The entropy can be related to its behaviour.



If the function is a permutation, $tau_m=2^N$ for all $mgeq 1$ and there is no entropy loss.



Edit: See the comment and link by @fgrieu which is an estimate of what I called $tau_1.$ He is saying that
$$
tau_1approx 2^{128-0.8272cdots }
$$

for $N=128.$






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Is there any estimate for the $k$?
    $endgroup$
    – kelalaka
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Except for small $N$, the $k$ depends very little on $N$, and for $N=128$ is already very close to its asymptotic value $eta=displaystyle{1over e}sum_{j=1}^infty{j;log_2jover j!};;=0.8272dotstext{bit}$. See this.
    $endgroup$
    – fgrieu
    8 hours ago
















3












3








3





$begingroup$

Actually, no. If it is a good Hash, you should roughly have $N-k$ bits of output entropy for some $k$ of much lower order than $N$.



The problem arises when the input is much longer than $N$ bits.



One way to estimate the entropy loss of such a Hash applied to $N$ bit inputs is to model it as a randomly chosen function on $N$ bits.
This was first done by Odlyzko and Flajolet. There is a nice review with updated results here



Let $tau_m$ be the image size of the $m$th iterate of the function. The entropy can be related to its behaviour.



If the function is a permutation, $tau_m=2^N$ for all $mgeq 1$ and there is no entropy loss.



Edit: See the comment and link by @fgrieu which is an estimate of what I called $tau_1.$ He is saying that
$$
tau_1approx 2^{128-0.8272cdots }
$$

for $N=128.$






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Actually, no. If it is a good Hash, you should roughly have $N-k$ bits of output entropy for some $k$ of much lower order than $N$.



The problem arises when the input is much longer than $N$ bits.



One way to estimate the entropy loss of such a Hash applied to $N$ bit inputs is to model it as a randomly chosen function on $N$ bits.
This was first done by Odlyzko and Flajolet. There is a nice review with updated results here



Let $tau_m$ be the image size of the $m$th iterate of the function. The entropy can be related to its behaviour.



If the function is a permutation, $tau_m=2^N$ for all $mgeq 1$ and there is no entropy loss.



Edit: See the comment and link by @fgrieu which is an estimate of what I called $tau_1.$ He is saying that
$$
tau_1approx 2^{128-0.8272cdots }
$$

for $N=128.$







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 8 hours ago

























answered 10 hours ago









kodlukodlu

8,72111229




8,72111229








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Is there any estimate for the $k$?
    $endgroup$
    – kelalaka
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Except for small $N$, the $k$ depends very little on $N$, and for $N=128$ is already very close to its asymptotic value $eta=displaystyle{1over e}sum_{j=1}^infty{j;log_2jover j!};;=0.8272dotstext{bit}$. See this.
    $endgroup$
    – fgrieu
    8 hours ago
















  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Is there any estimate for the $k$?
    $endgroup$
    – kelalaka
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Except for small $N$, the $k$ depends very little on $N$, and for $N=128$ is already very close to its asymptotic value $eta=displaystyle{1over e}sum_{j=1}^infty{j;log_2jover j!};;=0.8272dotstext{bit}$. See this.
    $endgroup$
    – fgrieu
    8 hours ago










3




3




$begingroup$
Is there any estimate for the $k$?
$endgroup$
– kelalaka
9 hours ago




$begingroup$
Is there any estimate for the $k$?
$endgroup$
– kelalaka
9 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Except for small $N$, the $k$ depends very little on $N$, and for $N=128$ is already very close to its asymptotic value $eta=displaystyle{1over e}sum_{j=1}^infty{j;log_2jover j!};;=0.8272dotstext{bit}$. See this.
$endgroup$
– fgrieu
8 hours ago






$begingroup$
Except for small $N$, the $k$ depends very little on $N$, and for $N=128$ is already very close to its asymptotic value $eta=displaystyle{1over e}sum_{j=1}^infty{j;log_2jover j!};;=0.8272dotstext{bit}$. See this.
$endgroup$
– fgrieu
8 hours ago












Sylvain Leroux is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















Sylvain Leroux is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













Sylvain Leroux is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Sylvain Leroux is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















Thanks for contributing an answer to Cryptography Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcrypto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f67217%2fcan-we-estimate-the-loss-of-entropy-when-applying-a-n-bit-hash-function-to-and-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

Alcedinidae

Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]