Is it possible to understand and enjoy classical music just by listening, without music theory knowledge?












4















Pretty much every book out there which claims to teach the readers to appreciate classical music, has significant amount of theory in it. Ex: What to listen for in Music by Aaron Copland. Is it not possible to enjoy a classical piece without having any theoretical knowledge? If it is possible, kindly point to correct resources which helps in achieving the goal.










share|improve this question









New contributor




gokul is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • In my career as music teacher I always hat some problems with classes with their stereotypes: all renaissance music was Christmas music for their ear. At least this showed they could distinguish the renaissance style and sound from others. When movie Amadeus appeared there was from one day to the other a quite different acceptance. There is a big aversion to new things in the children perception and also in adults. What we don't know is strange. strange says it all.

    – Albrecht Hügli
    12 hours ago






  • 6





    If they just said "listen and enjoy", they'd need to use very big letters to fill an entire book.

    – piiperi
    11 hours ago






  • 3





    Any kid who has ever loved the Star Wars Theme, the Imperial March, the Jaws theme, or any of a large number of orchestral instrumental works already appreciates “classical” music without knowing theory. You don’t have to know anything to love any kind of music. You either love it or you don’t.

    – Todd Wilcox
    10 hours ago













  • If you write about a piece of music, or a composer, you don't want to just write, "I like it. It makes me happy." That wouldn't be interesting to read. Instead you'd write about what makes the music/composer distinctive/different. How can you write about music without making it sound like "what to listen for"?

    – jwvh
    3 hours ago











  • I tend to feel that if you need a book or resource to tell you how to enjoy a particular piece of music, then that music might not be for you.

    – Aaron Lavers
    34 mins ago
















4















Pretty much every book out there which claims to teach the readers to appreciate classical music, has significant amount of theory in it. Ex: What to listen for in Music by Aaron Copland. Is it not possible to enjoy a classical piece without having any theoretical knowledge? If it is possible, kindly point to correct resources which helps in achieving the goal.










share|improve this question









New contributor




gokul is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • In my career as music teacher I always hat some problems with classes with their stereotypes: all renaissance music was Christmas music for their ear. At least this showed they could distinguish the renaissance style and sound from others. When movie Amadeus appeared there was from one day to the other a quite different acceptance. There is a big aversion to new things in the children perception and also in adults. What we don't know is strange. strange says it all.

    – Albrecht Hügli
    12 hours ago






  • 6





    If they just said "listen and enjoy", they'd need to use very big letters to fill an entire book.

    – piiperi
    11 hours ago






  • 3





    Any kid who has ever loved the Star Wars Theme, the Imperial March, the Jaws theme, or any of a large number of orchestral instrumental works already appreciates “classical” music without knowing theory. You don’t have to know anything to love any kind of music. You either love it or you don’t.

    – Todd Wilcox
    10 hours ago













  • If you write about a piece of music, or a composer, you don't want to just write, "I like it. It makes me happy." That wouldn't be interesting to read. Instead you'd write about what makes the music/composer distinctive/different. How can you write about music without making it sound like "what to listen for"?

    – jwvh
    3 hours ago











  • I tend to feel that if you need a book or resource to tell you how to enjoy a particular piece of music, then that music might not be for you.

    – Aaron Lavers
    34 mins ago














4












4








4








Pretty much every book out there which claims to teach the readers to appreciate classical music, has significant amount of theory in it. Ex: What to listen for in Music by Aaron Copland. Is it not possible to enjoy a classical piece without having any theoretical knowledge? If it is possible, kindly point to correct resources which helps in achieving the goal.










share|improve this question









New contributor




gokul is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












Pretty much every book out there which claims to teach the readers to appreciate classical music, has significant amount of theory in it. Ex: What to listen for in Music by Aaron Copland. Is it not possible to enjoy a classical piece without having any theoretical knowledge? If it is possible, kindly point to correct resources which helps in achieving the goal.







theory classical-music musicology






share|improve this question









New contributor




gokul is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




gokul is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 12 hours ago







gokul













New contributor




gokul is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 13 hours ago









gokulgokul

262




262




New contributor




gokul is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





gokul is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






gokul is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.













  • In my career as music teacher I always hat some problems with classes with their stereotypes: all renaissance music was Christmas music for their ear. At least this showed they could distinguish the renaissance style and sound from others. When movie Amadeus appeared there was from one day to the other a quite different acceptance. There is a big aversion to new things in the children perception and also in adults. What we don't know is strange. strange says it all.

    – Albrecht Hügli
    12 hours ago






  • 6





    If they just said "listen and enjoy", they'd need to use very big letters to fill an entire book.

    – piiperi
    11 hours ago






  • 3





    Any kid who has ever loved the Star Wars Theme, the Imperial March, the Jaws theme, or any of a large number of orchestral instrumental works already appreciates “classical” music without knowing theory. You don’t have to know anything to love any kind of music. You either love it or you don’t.

    – Todd Wilcox
    10 hours ago













  • If you write about a piece of music, or a composer, you don't want to just write, "I like it. It makes me happy." That wouldn't be interesting to read. Instead you'd write about what makes the music/composer distinctive/different. How can you write about music without making it sound like "what to listen for"?

    – jwvh
    3 hours ago











  • I tend to feel that if you need a book or resource to tell you how to enjoy a particular piece of music, then that music might not be for you.

    – Aaron Lavers
    34 mins ago



















  • In my career as music teacher I always hat some problems with classes with their stereotypes: all renaissance music was Christmas music for their ear. At least this showed they could distinguish the renaissance style and sound from others. When movie Amadeus appeared there was from one day to the other a quite different acceptance. There is a big aversion to new things in the children perception and also in adults. What we don't know is strange. strange says it all.

    – Albrecht Hügli
    12 hours ago






  • 6





    If they just said "listen and enjoy", they'd need to use very big letters to fill an entire book.

    – piiperi
    11 hours ago






  • 3





    Any kid who has ever loved the Star Wars Theme, the Imperial March, the Jaws theme, or any of a large number of orchestral instrumental works already appreciates “classical” music without knowing theory. You don’t have to know anything to love any kind of music. You either love it or you don’t.

    – Todd Wilcox
    10 hours ago













  • If you write about a piece of music, or a composer, you don't want to just write, "I like it. It makes me happy." That wouldn't be interesting to read. Instead you'd write about what makes the music/composer distinctive/different. How can you write about music without making it sound like "what to listen for"?

    – jwvh
    3 hours ago











  • I tend to feel that if you need a book or resource to tell you how to enjoy a particular piece of music, then that music might not be for you.

    – Aaron Lavers
    34 mins ago

















In my career as music teacher I always hat some problems with classes with their stereotypes: all renaissance music was Christmas music for their ear. At least this showed they could distinguish the renaissance style and sound from others. When movie Amadeus appeared there was from one day to the other a quite different acceptance. There is a big aversion to new things in the children perception and also in adults. What we don't know is strange. strange says it all.

– Albrecht Hügli
12 hours ago





In my career as music teacher I always hat some problems with classes with their stereotypes: all renaissance music was Christmas music for their ear. At least this showed they could distinguish the renaissance style and sound from others. When movie Amadeus appeared there was from one day to the other a quite different acceptance. There is a big aversion to new things in the children perception and also in adults. What we don't know is strange. strange says it all.

– Albrecht Hügli
12 hours ago




6




6





If they just said "listen and enjoy", they'd need to use very big letters to fill an entire book.

– piiperi
11 hours ago





If they just said "listen and enjoy", they'd need to use very big letters to fill an entire book.

– piiperi
11 hours ago




3




3





Any kid who has ever loved the Star Wars Theme, the Imperial March, the Jaws theme, or any of a large number of orchestral instrumental works already appreciates “classical” music without knowing theory. You don’t have to know anything to love any kind of music. You either love it or you don’t.

– Todd Wilcox
10 hours ago







Any kid who has ever loved the Star Wars Theme, the Imperial March, the Jaws theme, or any of a large number of orchestral instrumental works already appreciates “classical” music without knowing theory. You don’t have to know anything to love any kind of music. You either love it or you don’t.

– Todd Wilcox
10 hours ago















If you write about a piece of music, or a composer, you don't want to just write, "I like it. It makes me happy." That wouldn't be interesting to read. Instead you'd write about what makes the music/composer distinctive/different. How can you write about music without making it sound like "what to listen for"?

– jwvh
3 hours ago





If you write about a piece of music, or a composer, you don't want to just write, "I like it. It makes me happy." That wouldn't be interesting to read. Instead you'd write about what makes the music/composer distinctive/different. How can you write about music without making it sound like "what to listen for"?

– jwvh
3 hours ago













I tend to feel that if you need a book or resource to tell you how to enjoy a particular piece of music, then that music might not be for you.

– Aaron Lavers
34 mins ago





I tend to feel that if you need a book or resource to tell you how to enjoy a particular piece of music, then that music might not be for you.

– Aaron Lavers
34 mins ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















10














Of course it is. And most people do.



And, while any piece more extended than a simple song probably does involve a 'journey' of some kind, there's no need to invent a storyline.






share|improve this answer































    6














    Is it possible to enjoy driving a car without understanding how the gearbox works? Watching t.v. without understanding the electronics involved?



    Yes, of course! In fact, once theory is studied and understood, most music is listened to and appreciated in other ways. Not better or worse, just different.



    Think about it: if music was only appreciated if the listener was versed in theory, it would have probably died the death well before now.



    A lot of my students have commented that they don't listen to music in the same way, once they understand the tricks used and the theory involved. Which can be detrimental, as they then tend to analyse it more, delving deeper into it, to different layers. But that's not necessarily good or bad as far as listening and appreciating goes, just different.



    This may get closed as 'how does a layman understand a piece' is very subjective. Take ten people who've listened to a piece of music, and there will likely be ten different reactions, interpretations, or whatever you want to call it, that the music will have given them. O.k., a minor piece may(?) give a sad feeling , but go deeper, and it could be interpreted as nostalgic, sorrowful, serious, tear-jerking, or lots of other emotional effects. Then you'll get the ones who liked the Tierce de Picardie at the end, or the way it modulated in the middle, or the way the staccato part came over. Get the idea?






    share|improve this answer
























    • I'd add that if anything, knowing theory allows me to think about and appreciate the composer's work more than I'd be able to without it. It's the same thing that allows me to appreciate software much more because I know how to code it, and I know the effort that it entails. None of that is necessary to use or appreciate any of those things, but it definitely gives perspective, which in a way may (or may not) be good or helpful to you.

      – Ars
      34 mins ago



















    2














    Yes, it is. They might probably say this is a opinion based question. But everyone who has ever heard some classical music as a baby will confirm that this music is in his mind and his soul like he drunk the milk of his mothers breast.



    The adaption to classical music is like the learning of a language, if you've learnt it as a child you will understand it without grammar and theory. But later it will be more difficult like learning a foreign language than the mother language. Theory could be a good help to make it easier but more important are the elements of what you got when you was brought up.




    Is it possible to fully enjoy a classical music piece without knowing
    the theory behind it? If one should know music theory to enjoy a
    piece, was/is classical music for aristocrats? How would layman
    understand a piece?




    So to answer your question: it is not only possible, it would be quite ordinary that one could understands and enjoy classical music - if he has been adapted to it or if he really wants to listen to it.






    share|improve this answer


























    • I've been recently on a UNICEF-benefit concert of the high school where my son is employed as music teacher. This is may be an elite school but it is to say that we have in our classes over 50% (sometimes over 80% children of fugitives and migrants. A girl played this concerto for clarinet by Copland and she was very fine accepted by all comrades. They really enjoyed it.. youtube.com/watch?v=9RX1m5JCCCA

      – Albrecht Hügli
      12 hours ago



















    -1














    Sure. Not bothering about music theory is a valid shortcut to thoroughly engaging with classical music. Like most shortcuts, it actually tends to take quite longer to arrive at any desired destination but if making progress is not on your agenda that may not matter to you.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    user57505 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.




















      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "240"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });






      gokul is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f79818%2fis-it-possible-to-understand-and-enjoy-classical-music-just-by-listening-withou%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes








      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      10














      Of course it is. And most people do.



      And, while any piece more extended than a simple song probably does involve a 'journey' of some kind, there's no need to invent a storyline.






      share|improve this answer




























        10














        Of course it is. And most people do.



        And, while any piece more extended than a simple song probably does involve a 'journey' of some kind, there's no need to invent a storyline.






        share|improve this answer


























          10












          10








          10







          Of course it is. And most people do.



          And, while any piece more extended than a simple song probably does involve a 'journey' of some kind, there's no need to invent a storyline.






          share|improve this answer













          Of course it is. And most people do.



          And, while any piece more extended than a simple song probably does involve a 'journey' of some kind, there's no need to invent a storyline.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 12 hours ago









          Laurence PayneLaurence Payne

          33.9k1562




          33.9k1562























              6














              Is it possible to enjoy driving a car without understanding how the gearbox works? Watching t.v. without understanding the electronics involved?



              Yes, of course! In fact, once theory is studied and understood, most music is listened to and appreciated in other ways. Not better or worse, just different.



              Think about it: if music was only appreciated if the listener was versed in theory, it would have probably died the death well before now.



              A lot of my students have commented that they don't listen to music in the same way, once they understand the tricks used and the theory involved. Which can be detrimental, as they then tend to analyse it more, delving deeper into it, to different layers. But that's not necessarily good or bad as far as listening and appreciating goes, just different.



              This may get closed as 'how does a layman understand a piece' is very subjective. Take ten people who've listened to a piece of music, and there will likely be ten different reactions, interpretations, or whatever you want to call it, that the music will have given them. O.k., a minor piece may(?) give a sad feeling , but go deeper, and it could be interpreted as nostalgic, sorrowful, serious, tear-jerking, or lots of other emotional effects. Then you'll get the ones who liked the Tierce de Picardie at the end, or the way it modulated in the middle, or the way the staccato part came over. Get the idea?






              share|improve this answer
























              • I'd add that if anything, knowing theory allows me to think about and appreciate the composer's work more than I'd be able to without it. It's the same thing that allows me to appreciate software much more because I know how to code it, and I know the effort that it entails. None of that is necessary to use or appreciate any of those things, but it definitely gives perspective, which in a way may (or may not) be good or helpful to you.

                – Ars
                34 mins ago
















              6














              Is it possible to enjoy driving a car without understanding how the gearbox works? Watching t.v. without understanding the electronics involved?



              Yes, of course! In fact, once theory is studied and understood, most music is listened to and appreciated in other ways. Not better or worse, just different.



              Think about it: if music was only appreciated if the listener was versed in theory, it would have probably died the death well before now.



              A lot of my students have commented that they don't listen to music in the same way, once they understand the tricks used and the theory involved. Which can be detrimental, as they then tend to analyse it more, delving deeper into it, to different layers. But that's not necessarily good or bad as far as listening and appreciating goes, just different.



              This may get closed as 'how does a layman understand a piece' is very subjective. Take ten people who've listened to a piece of music, and there will likely be ten different reactions, interpretations, or whatever you want to call it, that the music will have given them. O.k., a minor piece may(?) give a sad feeling , but go deeper, and it could be interpreted as nostalgic, sorrowful, serious, tear-jerking, or lots of other emotional effects. Then you'll get the ones who liked the Tierce de Picardie at the end, or the way it modulated in the middle, or the way the staccato part came over. Get the idea?






              share|improve this answer
























              • I'd add that if anything, knowing theory allows me to think about and appreciate the composer's work more than I'd be able to without it. It's the same thing that allows me to appreciate software much more because I know how to code it, and I know the effort that it entails. None of that is necessary to use or appreciate any of those things, but it definitely gives perspective, which in a way may (or may not) be good or helpful to you.

                – Ars
                34 mins ago














              6












              6








              6







              Is it possible to enjoy driving a car without understanding how the gearbox works? Watching t.v. without understanding the electronics involved?



              Yes, of course! In fact, once theory is studied and understood, most music is listened to and appreciated in other ways. Not better or worse, just different.



              Think about it: if music was only appreciated if the listener was versed in theory, it would have probably died the death well before now.



              A lot of my students have commented that they don't listen to music in the same way, once they understand the tricks used and the theory involved. Which can be detrimental, as they then tend to analyse it more, delving deeper into it, to different layers. But that's not necessarily good or bad as far as listening and appreciating goes, just different.



              This may get closed as 'how does a layman understand a piece' is very subjective. Take ten people who've listened to a piece of music, and there will likely be ten different reactions, interpretations, or whatever you want to call it, that the music will have given them. O.k., a minor piece may(?) give a sad feeling , but go deeper, and it could be interpreted as nostalgic, sorrowful, serious, tear-jerking, or lots of other emotional effects. Then you'll get the ones who liked the Tierce de Picardie at the end, or the way it modulated in the middle, or the way the staccato part came over. Get the idea?






              share|improve this answer













              Is it possible to enjoy driving a car without understanding how the gearbox works? Watching t.v. without understanding the electronics involved?



              Yes, of course! In fact, once theory is studied and understood, most music is listened to and appreciated in other ways. Not better or worse, just different.



              Think about it: if music was only appreciated if the listener was versed in theory, it would have probably died the death well before now.



              A lot of my students have commented that they don't listen to music in the same way, once they understand the tricks used and the theory involved. Which can be detrimental, as they then tend to analyse it more, delving deeper into it, to different layers. But that's not necessarily good or bad as far as listening and appreciating goes, just different.



              This may get closed as 'how does a layman understand a piece' is very subjective. Take ten people who've listened to a piece of music, and there will likely be ten different reactions, interpretations, or whatever you want to call it, that the music will have given them. O.k., a minor piece may(?) give a sad feeling , but go deeper, and it could be interpreted as nostalgic, sorrowful, serious, tear-jerking, or lots of other emotional effects. Then you'll get the ones who liked the Tierce de Picardie at the end, or the way it modulated in the middle, or the way the staccato part came over. Get the idea?







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered 12 hours ago









              TimTim

              99.9k10101253




              99.9k10101253













              • I'd add that if anything, knowing theory allows me to think about and appreciate the composer's work more than I'd be able to without it. It's the same thing that allows me to appreciate software much more because I know how to code it, and I know the effort that it entails. None of that is necessary to use or appreciate any of those things, but it definitely gives perspective, which in a way may (or may not) be good or helpful to you.

                – Ars
                34 mins ago



















              • I'd add that if anything, knowing theory allows me to think about and appreciate the composer's work more than I'd be able to without it. It's the same thing that allows me to appreciate software much more because I know how to code it, and I know the effort that it entails. None of that is necessary to use or appreciate any of those things, but it definitely gives perspective, which in a way may (or may not) be good or helpful to you.

                – Ars
                34 mins ago

















              I'd add that if anything, knowing theory allows me to think about and appreciate the composer's work more than I'd be able to without it. It's the same thing that allows me to appreciate software much more because I know how to code it, and I know the effort that it entails. None of that is necessary to use or appreciate any of those things, but it definitely gives perspective, which in a way may (or may not) be good or helpful to you.

              – Ars
              34 mins ago





              I'd add that if anything, knowing theory allows me to think about and appreciate the composer's work more than I'd be able to without it. It's the same thing that allows me to appreciate software much more because I know how to code it, and I know the effort that it entails. None of that is necessary to use or appreciate any of those things, but it definitely gives perspective, which in a way may (or may not) be good or helpful to you.

              – Ars
              34 mins ago











              2














              Yes, it is. They might probably say this is a opinion based question. But everyone who has ever heard some classical music as a baby will confirm that this music is in his mind and his soul like he drunk the milk of his mothers breast.



              The adaption to classical music is like the learning of a language, if you've learnt it as a child you will understand it without grammar and theory. But later it will be more difficult like learning a foreign language than the mother language. Theory could be a good help to make it easier but more important are the elements of what you got when you was brought up.




              Is it possible to fully enjoy a classical music piece without knowing
              the theory behind it? If one should know music theory to enjoy a
              piece, was/is classical music for aristocrats? How would layman
              understand a piece?




              So to answer your question: it is not only possible, it would be quite ordinary that one could understands and enjoy classical music - if he has been adapted to it or if he really wants to listen to it.






              share|improve this answer


























              • I've been recently on a UNICEF-benefit concert of the high school where my son is employed as music teacher. This is may be an elite school but it is to say that we have in our classes over 50% (sometimes over 80% children of fugitives and migrants. A girl played this concerto for clarinet by Copland and she was very fine accepted by all comrades. They really enjoyed it.. youtube.com/watch?v=9RX1m5JCCCA

                – Albrecht Hügli
                12 hours ago
















              2














              Yes, it is. They might probably say this is a opinion based question. But everyone who has ever heard some classical music as a baby will confirm that this music is in his mind and his soul like he drunk the milk of his mothers breast.



              The adaption to classical music is like the learning of a language, if you've learnt it as a child you will understand it without grammar and theory. But later it will be more difficult like learning a foreign language than the mother language. Theory could be a good help to make it easier but more important are the elements of what you got when you was brought up.




              Is it possible to fully enjoy a classical music piece without knowing
              the theory behind it? If one should know music theory to enjoy a
              piece, was/is classical music for aristocrats? How would layman
              understand a piece?




              So to answer your question: it is not only possible, it would be quite ordinary that one could understands and enjoy classical music - if he has been adapted to it or if he really wants to listen to it.






              share|improve this answer


























              • I've been recently on a UNICEF-benefit concert of the high school where my son is employed as music teacher. This is may be an elite school but it is to say that we have in our classes over 50% (sometimes over 80% children of fugitives and migrants. A girl played this concerto for clarinet by Copland and she was very fine accepted by all comrades. They really enjoyed it.. youtube.com/watch?v=9RX1m5JCCCA

                – Albrecht Hügli
                12 hours ago














              2












              2








              2







              Yes, it is. They might probably say this is a opinion based question. But everyone who has ever heard some classical music as a baby will confirm that this music is in his mind and his soul like he drunk the milk of his mothers breast.



              The adaption to classical music is like the learning of a language, if you've learnt it as a child you will understand it without grammar and theory. But later it will be more difficult like learning a foreign language than the mother language. Theory could be a good help to make it easier but more important are the elements of what you got when you was brought up.




              Is it possible to fully enjoy a classical music piece without knowing
              the theory behind it? If one should know music theory to enjoy a
              piece, was/is classical music for aristocrats? How would layman
              understand a piece?




              So to answer your question: it is not only possible, it would be quite ordinary that one could understands and enjoy classical music - if he has been adapted to it or if he really wants to listen to it.






              share|improve this answer















              Yes, it is. They might probably say this is a opinion based question. But everyone who has ever heard some classical music as a baby will confirm that this music is in his mind and his soul like he drunk the milk of his mothers breast.



              The adaption to classical music is like the learning of a language, if you've learnt it as a child you will understand it without grammar and theory. But later it will be more difficult like learning a foreign language than the mother language. Theory could be a good help to make it easier but more important are the elements of what you got when you was brought up.




              Is it possible to fully enjoy a classical music piece without knowing
              the theory behind it? If one should know music theory to enjoy a
              piece, was/is classical music for aristocrats? How would layman
              understand a piece?




              So to answer your question: it is not only possible, it would be quite ordinary that one could understands and enjoy classical music - if he has been adapted to it or if he really wants to listen to it.







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited 12 hours ago

























              answered 12 hours ago









              Albrecht HügliAlbrecht Hügli

              1,874219




              1,874219













              • I've been recently on a UNICEF-benefit concert of the high school where my son is employed as music teacher. This is may be an elite school but it is to say that we have in our classes over 50% (sometimes over 80% children of fugitives and migrants. A girl played this concerto for clarinet by Copland and she was very fine accepted by all comrades. They really enjoyed it.. youtube.com/watch?v=9RX1m5JCCCA

                – Albrecht Hügli
                12 hours ago



















              • I've been recently on a UNICEF-benefit concert of the high school where my son is employed as music teacher. This is may be an elite school but it is to say that we have in our classes over 50% (sometimes over 80% children of fugitives and migrants. A girl played this concerto for clarinet by Copland and she was very fine accepted by all comrades. They really enjoyed it.. youtube.com/watch?v=9RX1m5JCCCA

                – Albrecht Hügli
                12 hours ago

















              I've been recently on a UNICEF-benefit concert of the high school where my son is employed as music teacher. This is may be an elite school but it is to say that we have in our classes over 50% (sometimes over 80% children of fugitives and migrants. A girl played this concerto for clarinet by Copland and she was very fine accepted by all comrades. They really enjoyed it.. youtube.com/watch?v=9RX1m5JCCCA

              – Albrecht Hügli
              12 hours ago





              I've been recently on a UNICEF-benefit concert of the high school where my son is employed as music teacher. This is may be an elite school but it is to say that we have in our classes over 50% (sometimes over 80% children of fugitives and migrants. A girl played this concerto for clarinet by Copland and she was very fine accepted by all comrades. They really enjoyed it.. youtube.com/watch?v=9RX1m5JCCCA

              – Albrecht Hügli
              12 hours ago











              -1














              Sure. Not bothering about music theory is a valid shortcut to thoroughly engaging with classical music. Like most shortcuts, it actually tends to take quite longer to arrive at any desired destination but if making progress is not on your agenda that may not matter to you.






              share|improve this answer








              New contributor




              user57505 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.

























                -1














                Sure. Not bothering about music theory is a valid shortcut to thoroughly engaging with classical music. Like most shortcuts, it actually tends to take quite longer to arrive at any desired destination but if making progress is not on your agenda that may not matter to you.






                share|improve this answer








                New contributor




                user57505 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.























                  -1












                  -1








                  -1







                  Sure. Not bothering about music theory is a valid shortcut to thoroughly engaging with classical music. Like most shortcuts, it actually tends to take quite longer to arrive at any desired destination but if making progress is not on your agenda that may not matter to you.






                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  user57505 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.










                  Sure. Not bothering about music theory is a valid shortcut to thoroughly engaging with classical music. Like most shortcuts, it actually tends to take quite longer to arrive at any desired destination but if making progress is not on your agenda that may not matter to you.







                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  user57505 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer






                  New contributor




                  user57505 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  answered 12 hours ago









                  user57505user57505

                  1




                  1




                  New contributor




                  user57505 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





                  New contributor





                  user57505 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                  user57505 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






















                      gokul is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      gokul is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                      gokul is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      gokul is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Music: Practice & Theory Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f79818%2fis-it-possible-to-understand-and-enjoy-classical-music-just-by-listening-withou%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

                      Alcedinidae

                      Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]