Is there anything in the rules giving Loxodons disadvantage on Stealth checks?
$begingroup$
I'm curious if there is a ruling on this topic. Specifically the debate was over whether a Loxodon Way of the Shadow Monk could benefit from the massive stealth advantages and ninja-teleportation. This would apply equally I presume for Centaurs and other larger (but still medium) playable races.
Speaking of "flavor" it seems a Loxodon/Centaur ninja would be highly ineffective. A 7ft tall 400lb elephant probably wouldn't make a great ninja, right? It makes sense from a world concept level.
But is there actually anything in the rules that would give these large (but still Medium-sized) creatures disadvantage on Stealth checks?
dnd-5e races stealth ravnica
edited yesterday
V2Blast
21.9k366139
asked yesterday
Nick TydryszewskiNick Tydryszewski
1995
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm curious if there is a ruling on this topic. Specifically the debate was over whether a Loxodon Way of the Shadow Monk could benefit from the massive stealth advantages and ninja-teleportation. This would apply equally I presume for Centaurs and other larger (but still medium) playable races.
Speaking of "flavor" it seems a Loxodon/Centaur ninja would be highly ineffective. A 7ft tall 400lb elephant probably wouldn't make a great ninja, right? It makes sense from a world concept level.
But is there actually anything in the rules that would give these large (but still Medium-sized) creatures disadvantage on Stealth checks?
dnd-5e races stealth ravnica
edited yesterday
V2Blast
21.9k366139
asked yesterday
Nick TydryszewskiNick Tydryszewski
1995
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Tigers are up to 12 feet and weigh 800lb and they have massive stealth advantages
$endgroup$
– Dale M
20 hours ago
5
$begingroup$
If you've never seen a Loxodon Ninja, is it because they are really good at stealth?
$endgroup$
– Caleth
20 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm curious if there is a ruling on this topic. Specifically the debate was over whether a Loxodon Way of the Shadow Monk could benefit from the massive stealth advantages and ninja-teleportation. This would apply equally I presume for Centaurs and other larger (but still medium) playable races.
Speaking of "flavor" it seems a Loxodon/Centaur ninja would be highly ineffective. A 7ft tall 400lb elephant probably wouldn't make a great ninja, right? It makes sense from a world concept level.
But is there actually anything in the rules that would give these large (but still Medium-sized) creatures disadvantage on Stealth checks?
dnd-5e races stealth ravnica
edited yesterday
V2Blast
21.9k366139
asked yesterday
Nick TydryszewskiNick Tydryszewski
1995
$endgroup$
I'm curious if there is a ruling on this topic. Specifically the debate was over whether a Loxodon Way of the Shadow Monk could benefit from the massive stealth advantages and ninja-teleportation. This would apply equally I presume for Centaurs and other larger (but still medium) playable races.
Speaking of "flavor" it seems a Loxodon/Centaur ninja would be highly ineffective. A 7ft tall 400lb elephant probably wouldn't make a great ninja, right? It makes sense from a world concept level.
But is there actually anything in the rules that would give these large (but still Medium-sized) creatures disadvantage on Stealth checks?
dnd-5e races stealth ravnica
dnd-5e races stealth ravnica
edited yesterday
V2Blast
21.9k366139
asked yesterday
Nick TydryszewskiNick Tydryszewski
1995
edited yesterday
V2Blast
21.9k366139
asked yesterday
Nick TydryszewskiNick Tydryszewski
1995
edited yesterday
V2Blast
21.9k366139
edited yesterday
V2Blast
21.9k366139
edited yesterday
V2Blast
21.9k366139
21.9k366139
asked yesterday
Nick TydryszewskiNick Tydryszewski
1995
asked yesterday
Nick TydryszewskiNick Tydryszewski
1995
asked yesterday
Nick TydryszewskiNick Tydryszewski
1995
1995
1
$begingroup$
Tigers are up to 12 feet and weigh 800lb and they have massive stealth advantages
$endgroup$
– Dale M
20 hours ago
5
$begingroup$
If you've never seen a Loxodon Ninja, is it because they are really good at stealth?
$endgroup$
– Caleth
20 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Tigers are up to 12 feet and weigh 800lb and they have massive stealth advantages
$endgroup$
– Dale M
20 hours ago
5
$begingroup$
If you've never seen a Loxodon Ninja, is it because they are really good at stealth?
$endgroup$
– Caleth
20 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Tigers are up to 12 feet and weigh 800lb and they have massive stealth advantages
$endgroup$
– Dale M
20 hours ago
$begingroup$
Tigers are up to 12 feet and weigh 800lb and they have massive stealth advantages
$endgroup$
– Dale M
20 hours ago
5
5
$begingroup$
If you've never seen a Loxodon Ninja, is it because they are really good at stealth?
$endgroup$
– Caleth
20 hours ago
$begingroup$
If you've never seen a Loxodon Ninja, is it because they are really good at stealth?
$endgroup$
– Caleth
20 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
There are no hard rules associating a creature's size with their ability to sneak in this way. Mechanically, the Loxodon is as capable of learning the art of stealth as any race.
The fifth edition of DnD does allow for a way for GM to introduce "common sense" elements into difficulty: advantage and disadvantage. Having one's ankles chained together would be a good example of a reason why a GM'd give disadvantage.
However, introducing a permanent disadvantage for a skill the character uses a lot --- stealth in this case --- is in bad taste if the player was not aware of the penalty in advance. How you want to apply this kind of realism in the table is your choice as a group, so talk with your players if you have a problem with it.
answered yesterday
kviirikviiri
35.6k8134203
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, but they won't be able to hide as often.
There is nothing giving loxodon or centaur players a straight disadvantage at stealth check. Actually, size doesn't even affect Dexterity(Stealth) ability checks at all. When rolling to hide, a Gargantuan Gold Dragon has better chances than a Tiny Cat.
It does not mean that they have the same chances to crawl unnoticed behind your sofa, though ; this is covered by the "hiding" rules :
HIDING
The DM decides when circumstances are appropriate for hiding.
Obviously, a loxodon or centaur will have much more trouble finding an appropriate hiding spot than, say, a human or a dwarf. The DM may use disadvantage at stealth, or advantage at perception, to solve this kind of situation - but he also may decide you can't hide at all.
On the other hand... It may be worth it - as once you hit level 11 and can turn invisible in shadows... There's much fun to be had. I guess the look on your opponent's face, when you reveal yourself, should be priceless.
answered 20 hours ago
BashBash
63413
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Exactly this. To hide, you have to have a hiding spot.
$endgroup$
– Mark Wells
16 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f140592%2fis-there-anything-in-the-rules-giving-loxodons-disadvantage-on-stealth-checks%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
There are no hard rules associating a creature's size with their ability to sneak in this way. Mechanically, the Loxodon is as capable of learning the art of stealth as any race.
The fifth edition of DnD does allow for a way for GM to introduce "common sense" elements into difficulty: advantage and disadvantage. Having one's ankles chained together would be a good example of a reason why a GM'd give disadvantage.
However, introducing a permanent disadvantage for a skill the character uses a lot --- stealth in this case --- is in bad taste if the player was not aware of the penalty in advance. How you want to apply this kind of realism in the table is your choice as a group, so talk with your players if you have a problem with it.
answered yesterday
kviirikviiri
35.6k8134203
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There are no hard rules associating a creature's size with their ability to sneak in this way. Mechanically, the Loxodon is as capable of learning the art of stealth as any race.
The fifth edition of DnD does allow for a way for GM to introduce "common sense" elements into difficulty: advantage and disadvantage. Having one's ankles chained together would be a good example of a reason why a GM'd give disadvantage.
However, introducing a permanent disadvantage for a skill the character uses a lot --- stealth in this case --- is in bad taste if the player was not aware of the penalty in advance. How you want to apply this kind of realism in the table is your choice as a group, so talk with your players if you have a problem with it.
answered yesterday
kviirikviiri
35.6k8134203
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There are no hard rules associating a creature's size with their ability to sneak in this way. Mechanically, the Loxodon is as capable of learning the art of stealth as any race.
The fifth edition of DnD does allow for a way for GM to introduce "common sense" elements into difficulty: advantage and disadvantage. Having one's ankles chained together would be a good example of a reason why a GM'd give disadvantage.
However, introducing a permanent disadvantage for a skill the character uses a lot --- stealth in this case --- is in bad taste if the player was not aware of the penalty in advance. How you want to apply this kind of realism in the table is your choice as a group, so talk with your players if you have a problem with it.
answered yesterday
kviirikviiri
35.6k8134203
$endgroup$
There are no hard rules associating a creature's size with their ability to sneak in this way. Mechanically, the Loxodon is as capable of learning the art of stealth as any race.
The fifth edition of DnD does allow for a way for GM to introduce "common sense" elements into difficulty: advantage and disadvantage. Having one's ankles chained together would be a good example of a reason why a GM'd give disadvantage.
However, introducing a permanent disadvantage for a skill the character uses a lot --- stealth in this case --- is in bad taste if the player was not aware of the penalty in advance. How you want to apply this kind of realism in the table is your choice as a group, so talk with your players if you have a problem with it.
answered yesterday
kviirikviiri
35.6k8134203
answered yesterday
kviirikviiri
35.6k8134203
answered yesterday
kviirikviiri
35.6k8134203
answered yesterday
kviirikviiri
35.6k8134203
35.6k8134203
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, but they won't be able to hide as often.
There is nothing giving loxodon or centaur players a straight disadvantage at stealth check. Actually, size doesn't even affect Dexterity(Stealth) ability checks at all. When rolling to hide, a Gargantuan Gold Dragon has better chances than a Tiny Cat.
It does not mean that they have the same chances to crawl unnoticed behind your sofa, though ; this is covered by the "hiding" rules :
HIDING
The DM decides when circumstances are appropriate for hiding.
Obviously, a loxodon or centaur will have much more trouble finding an appropriate hiding spot than, say, a human or a dwarf. The DM may use disadvantage at stealth, or advantage at perception, to solve this kind of situation - but he also may decide you can't hide at all.
On the other hand... It may be worth it - as once you hit level 11 and can turn invisible in shadows... There's much fun to be had. I guess the look on your opponent's face, when you reveal yourself, should be priceless.
answered 20 hours ago
BashBash
63413
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Exactly this. To hide, you have to have a hiding spot.
$endgroup$
– Mark Wells
16 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, but they won't be able to hide as often.
There is nothing giving loxodon or centaur players a straight disadvantage at stealth check. Actually, size doesn't even affect Dexterity(Stealth) ability checks at all. When rolling to hide, a Gargantuan Gold Dragon has better chances than a Tiny Cat.
It does not mean that they have the same chances to crawl unnoticed behind your sofa, though ; this is covered by the "hiding" rules :
HIDING
The DM decides when circumstances are appropriate for hiding.
Obviously, a loxodon or centaur will have much more trouble finding an appropriate hiding spot than, say, a human or a dwarf. The DM may use disadvantage at stealth, or advantage at perception, to solve this kind of situation - but he also may decide you can't hide at all.
On the other hand... It may be worth it - as once you hit level 11 and can turn invisible in shadows... There's much fun to be had. I guess the look on your opponent's face, when you reveal yourself, should be priceless.
answered 20 hours ago
BashBash
63413
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Exactly this. To hide, you have to have a hiding spot.
$endgroup$
– Mark Wells
16 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, but they won't be able to hide as often.
There is nothing giving loxodon or centaur players a straight disadvantage at stealth check. Actually, size doesn't even affect Dexterity(Stealth) ability checks at all. When rolling to hide, a Gargantuan Gold Dragon has better chances than a Tiny Cat.
It does not mean that they have the same chances to crawl unnoticed behind your sofa, though ; this is covered by the "hiding" rules :
HIDING
The DM decides when circumstances are appropriate for hiding.
Obviously, a loxodon or centaur will have much more trouble finding an appropriate hiding spot than, say, a human or a dwarf. The DM may use disadvantage at stealth, or advantage at perception, to solve this kind of situation - but he also may decide you can't hide at all.
On the other hand... It may be worth it - as once you hit level 11 and can turn invisible in shadows... There's much fun to be had. I guess the look on your opponent's face, when you reveal yourself, should be priceless.
answered 20 hours ago
BashBash
63413
$endgroup$
No, but they won't be able to hide as often.
There is nothing giving loxodon or centaur players a straight disadvantage at stealth check. Actually, size doesn't even affect Dexterity(Stealth) ability checks at all. When rolling to hide, a Gargantuan Gold Dragon has better chances than a Tiny Cat.
It does not mean that they have the same chances to crawl unnoticed behind your sofa, though ; this is covered by the "hiding" rules :
HIDING
The DM decides when circumstances are appropriate for hiding.
Obviously, a loxodon or centaur will have much more trouble finding an appropriate hiding spot than, say, a human or a dwarf. The DM may use disadvantage at stealth, or advantage at perception, to solve this kind of situation - but he also may decide you can't hide at all.
On the other hand... It may be worth it - as once you hit level 11 and can turn invisible in shadows... There's much fun to be had. I guess the look on your opponent's face, when you reveal yourself, should be priceless.
answered 20 hours ago
BashBash
63413
answered 20 hours ago
BashBash
63413
answered 20 hours ago
BashBash
63413
answered 20 hours ago
BashBash
63413
63413
$begingroup$
Exactly this. To hide, you have to have a hiding spot.
$endgroup$
– Mark Wells
16 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Exactly this. To hide, you have to have a hiding spot.
$endgroup$
– Mark Wells
16 hours ago
$begingroup$
Exactly this. To hide, you have to have a hiding spot.
$endgroup$
– Mark Wells
16 hours ago
$begingroup$
Exactly this. To hide, you have to have a hiding spot.
$endgroup$
– Mark Wells
16 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f140592%2fis-there-anything-in-the-rules-giving-loxodons-disadvantage-on-stealth-checks%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Tigers are up to 12 feet and weigh 800lb and they have massive stealth advantages
$endgroup$
– Dale M
20 hours ago
5
$begingroup$
If you've never seen a Loxodon Ninja, is it because they are really good at stealth?
$endgroup$
– Caleth
20 hours ago