What incentives do banks have to gather up loans into pools (backed by Ginnie Mae)and selling them?












11















This is a two part question:



1) I understand that there are certain mortgage loans that when originated by banks can be gathered up into pools and then "sold" to investors, and that these pools are backed by Ginnie Mae, in the sense that, if the borrowers are unable to make payments, and the banks that originated them are also unable to make make payments, then Ginnie Mae would step in and make the payment.



My first question is about the banks. What incentive do they have to gather up the loans in pools and sell them to investors? Because the payments made are not ending up in their pockets, but that of the investors instead.



2) Secondly, I've read that, in this process, Ginnie Mae collects a fee (of a max of 6 basis points). Who is this "fee" levied upon?



I hope my questions aren't too naive and simple to understand. Thanks!










share|edit







New contributor




ricksanchez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1





    Recommend reading The Big Short. Fun to read, interesting people in it, also details the CDO debacle, which is related to your question.

    – Almo
    11 hours ago











  • Didn't know The Big Short was a book. It's also a very entertaining and enlightening movie.

    – JoL
    10 hours ago
















11















This is a two part question:



1) I understand that there are certain mortgage loans that when originated by banks can be gathered up into pools and then "sold" to investors, and that these pools are backed by Ginnie Mae, in the sense that, if the borrowers are unable to make payments, and the banks that originated them are also unable to make make payments, then Ginnie Mae would step in and make the payment.



My first question is about the banks. What incentive do they have to gather up the loans in pools and sell them to investors? Because the payments made are not ending up in their pockets, but that of the investors instead.



2) Secondly, I've read that, in this process, Ginnie Mae collects a fee (of a max of 6 basis points). Who is this "fee" levied upon?



I hope my questions aren't too naive and simple to understand. Thanks!










share|edit







New contributor




ricksanchez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1





    Recommend reading The Big Short. Fun to read, interesting people in it, also details the CDO debacle, which is related to your question.

    – Almo
    11 hours ago











  • Didn't know The Big Short was a book. It's also a very entertaining and enlightening movie.

    – JoL
    10 hours ago














11












11








11


1






This is a two part question:



1) I understand that there are certain mortgage loans that when originated by banks can be gathered up into pools and then "sold" to investors, and that these pools are backed by Ginnie Mae, in the sense that, if the borrowers are unable to make payments, and the banks that originated them are also unable to make make payments, then Ginnie Mae would step in and make the payment.



My first question is about the banks. What incentive do they have to gather up the loans in pools and sell them to investors? Because the payments made are not ending up in their pockets, but that of the investors instead.



2) Secondly, I've read that, in this process, Ginnie Mae collects a fee (of a max of 6 basis points). Who is this "fee" levied upon?



I hope my questions aren't too naive and simple to understand. Thanks!










share|edit







New contributor




ricksanchez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












This is a two part question:



1) I understand that there are certain mortgage loans that when originated by banks can be gathered up into pools and then "sold" to investors, and that these pools are backed by Ginnie Mae, in the sense that, if the borrowers are unable to make payments, and the banks that originated them are also unable to make make payments, then Ginnie Mae would step in and make the payment.



My first question is about the banks. What incentive do they have to gather up the loans in pools and sell them to investors? Because the payments made are not ending up in their pockets, but that of the investors instead.



2) Secondly, I've read that, in this process, Ginnie Mae collects a fee (of a max of 6 basis points). Who is this "fee" levied upon?



I hope my questions aren't too naive and simple to understand. Thanks!







mortgage mortgage-rate






share|edit







New contributor




ricksanchez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|edit







New contributor




ricksanchez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|edit




share|edit






New contributor




ricksanchez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 14 hours ago









ricksanchezricksanchez

584




584




New contributor




ricksanchez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





ricksanchez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






ricksanchez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 1





    Recommend reading The Big Short. Fun to read, interesting people in it, also details the CDO debacle, which is related to your question.

    – Almo
    11 hours ago











  • Didn't know The Big Short was a book. It's also a very entertaining and enlightening movie.

    – JoL
    10 hours ago














  • 1





    Recommend reading The Big Short. Fun to read, interesting people in it, also details the CDO debacle, which is related to your question.

    – Almo
    11 hours ago











  • Didn't know The Big Short was a book. It's also a very entertaining and enlightening movie.

    – JoL
    10 hours ago








1




1





Recommend reading The Big Short. Fun to read, interesting people in it, also details the CDO debacle, which is related to your question.

– Almo
11 hours ago





Recommend reading The Big Short. Fun to read, interesting people in it, also details the CDO debacle, which is related to your question.

– Almo
11 hours ago













Didn't know The Big Short was a book. It's also a very entertaining and enlightening movie.

– JoL
10 hours ago





Didn't know The Big Short was a book. It's also a very entertaining and enlightening movie.

– JoL
10 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















24














Say I can lend money at a 10% rate. I lend you $10,000 and the note is for $11,000 due in one year. But, the next day, I can sell the note for $10,100, the buyer willing to get a return of 8.9%. ($11K/$10.1K). Why would I lend that $10K for a year, when I can turn over the loan and make 1% in a day?



The mortgage is more complex, of course. But the concept is similar. Underwriting the loan and selling it into a package (CMOs or Collateralized Mortgage Obligations) lets a small bank help their customer get the mortgage, but not have their funds tied up for decades. At the other end, are investors who can get a return on their money closer to the rate on long term loans.



The concept itself is sound so long at ethical underwriting is maintained, i.e. 20% down, 28/36 debt to income limits, etc. The market blew up when this was ignored, not because the premise was faulty.



The 6 basis points are skimmed from the payments homeowners make for the money then paid to the CMO holders.






share|improve this answer


























  • Yes, this works great for the banks if they can more than double the amount of loans they sell by making risky loans.

    – AbraCadaver
    11 hours ago








  • 2





    Great answer, but doesn't address the second question.

    – David Grinberg
    10 hours ago











  • Updated answer to address part deux.

    – JoeTaxpayer
    7 hours ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "93"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});






ricksanchez is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmoney.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f105843%2fwhat-incentives-do-banks-have-to-gather-up-loans-into-pools-backed-by-ginnie-ma%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









24














Say I can lend money at a 10% rate. I lend you $10,000 and the note is for $11,000 due in one year. But, the next day, I can sell the note for $10,100, the buyer willing to get a return of 8.9%. ($11K/$10.1K). Why would I lend that $10K for a year, when I can turn over the loan and make 1% in a day?



The mortgage is more complex, of course. But the concept is similar. Underwriting the loan and selling it into a package (CMOs or Collateralized Mortgage Obligations) lets a small bank help their customer get the mortgage, but not have their funds tied up for decades. At the other end, are investors who can get a return on their money closer to the rate on long term loans.



The concept itself is sound so long at ethical underwriting is maintained, i.e. 20% down, 28/36 debt to income limits, etc. The market blew up when this was ignored, not because the premise was faulty.



The 6 basis points are skimmed from the payments homeowners make for the money then paid to the CMO holders.






share|improve this answer


























  • Yes, this works great for the banks if they can more than double the amount of loans they sell by making risky loans.

    – AbraCadaver
    11 hours ago








  • 2





    Great answer, but doesn't address the second question.

    – David Grinberg
    10 hours ago











  • Updated answer to address part deux.

    – JoeTaxpayer
    7 hours ago
















24














Say I can lend money at a 10% rate. I lend you $10,000 and the note is for $11,000 due in one year. But, the next day, I can sell the note for $10,100, the buyer willing to get a return of 8.9%. ($11K/$10.1K). Why would I lend that $10K for a year, when I can turn over the loan and make 1% in a day?



The mortgage is more complex, of course. But the concept is similar. Underwriting the loan and selling it into a package (CMOs or Collateralized Mortgage Obligations) lets a small bank help their customer get the mortgage, but not have their funds tied up for decades. At the other end, are investors who can get a return on their money closer to the rate on long term loans.



The concept itself is sound so long at ethical underwriting is maintained, i.e. 20% down, 28/36 debt to income limits, etc. The market blew up when this was ignored, not because the premise was faulty.



The 6 basis points are skimmed from the payments homeowners make for the money then paid to the CMO holders.






share|improve this answer


























  • Yes, this works great for the banks if they can more than double the amount of loans they sell by making risky loans.

    – AbraCadaver
    11 hours ago








  • 2





    Great answer, but doesn't address the second question.

    – David Grinberg
    10 hours ago











  • Updated answer to address part deux.

    – JoeTaxpayer
    7 hours ago














24












24








24







Say I can lend money at a 10% rate. I lend you $10,000 and the note is for $11,000 due in one year. But, the next day, I can sell the note for $10,100, the buyer willing to get a return of 8.9%. ($11K/$10.1K). Why would I lend that $10K for a year, when I can turn over the loan and make 1% in a day?



The mortgage is more complex, of course. But the concept is similar. Underwriting the loan and selling it into a package (CMOs or Collateralized Mortgage Obligations) lets a small bank help their customer get the mortgage, but not have their funds tied up for decades. At the other end, are investors who can get a return on their money closer to the rate on long term loans.



The concept itself is sound so long at ethical underwriting is maintained, i.e. 20% down, 28/36 debt to income limits, etc. The market blew up when this was ignored, not because the premise was faulty.



The 6 basis points are skimmed from the payments homeowners make for the money then paid to the CMO holders.






share|improve this answer















Say I can lend money at a 10% rate. I lend you $10,000 and the note is for $11,000 due in one year. But, the next day, I can sell the note for $10,100, the buyer willing to get a return of 8.9%. ($11K/$10.1K). Why would I lend that $10K for a year, when I can turn over the loan and make 1% in a day?



The mortgage is more complex, of course. But the concept is similar. Underwriting the loan and selling it into a package (CMOs or Collateralized Mortgage Obligations) lets a small bank help their customer get the mortgage, but not have their funds tied up for decades. At the other end, are investors who can get a return on their money closer to the rate on long term loans.



The concept itself is sound so long at ethical underwriting is maintained, i.e. 20% down, 28/36 debt to income limits, etc. The market blew up when this was ignored, not because the premise was faulty.



The 6 basis points are skimmed from the payments homeowners make for the money then paid to the CMO holders.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 7 hours ago

























answered 13 hours ago









JoeTaxpayerJoeTaxpayer

144k22232465




144k22232465













  • Yes, this works great for the banks if they can more than double the amount of loans they sell by making risky loans.

    – AbraCadaver
    11 hours ago








  • 2





    Great answer, but doesn't address the second question.

    – David Grinberg
    10 hours ago











  • Updated answer to address part deux.

    – JoeTaxpayer
    7 hours ago



















  • Yes, this works great for the banks if they can more than double the amount of loans they sell by making risky loans.

    – AbraCadaver
    11 hours ago








  • 2





    Great answer, but doesn't address the second question.

    – David Grinberg
    10 hours ago











  • Updated answer to address part deux.

    – JoeTaxpayer
    7 hours ago

















Yes, this works great for the banks if they can more than double the amount of loans they sell by making risky loans.

– AbraCadaver
11 hours ago







Yes, this works great for the banks if they can more than double the amount of loans they sell by making risky loans.

– AbraCadaver
11 hours ago






2




2





Great answer, but doesn't address the second question.

– David Grinberg
10 hours ago





Great answer, but doesn't address the second question.

– David Grinberg
10 hours ago













Updated answer to address part deux.

– JoeTaxpayer
7 hours ago





Updated answer to address part deux.

– JoeTaxpayer
7 hours ago










ricksanchez is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















ricksanchez is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













ricksanchez is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












ricksanchez is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















Thanks for contributing an answer to Personal Finance & Money Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmoney.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f105843%2fwhat-incentives-do-banks-have-to-gather-up-loans-into-pools-backed-by-ginnie-ma%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

"Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

Alcedinidae

Origin of the phrase “under your belt”?