Word for products that cannot be bought individually [on hold]












-3














i.e. product B could be purchased if you have product A or must be purchased together.



I remember this term, its on the tip of my tongue - going crazy over it. PLEASE HELP =(










share|improve this question







New contributor




Arthur Romanov is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











put on hold as off-topic by tchrist yesterday


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – tchrist

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • I don't fully understand the context. Do you mean that the producer / supplier won't sell you Product A unless you present proof that you already own Product B (or you're simultaneously buying both products)? What about if someone else previously bought both products, but his A is broken - can he offer to sell you his B (which is no use to him without a working A) on eBay?
    – FumbleFingers
    2 days ago










  • What immediately comes to mine is "prerequisite", in your given context. As in: Purchasing Item A is a prerequisite to purchase Item B. (but as FumbleFingers indicated, it's not really a feasible scenario)
    – Gwendolyn
    2 days ago












  • Are you talking about things that are packaged together or cases where the one item is an accessory and you just wouldn’t want to buy it without having the thing it goes with?
    – Laurel
    2 days ago










  • Thank you for ask­ing. Some in­for­ma­tion will help us give you the cor­rect an­swer. Please [ᴇᴅɪᴛ] to add de­tails of re­search you’ve done, es­pe­cially so­lu­tions you’ve al­ready re­jected, and why. In­clude the de­sired con­no­ta­tion, reg­is­ter (for­mal­ity), part of speech, and con­text in which it is to be used, and if pos­si­ble pro­vide the ex­act en­clos­ing sen­tence or pas­sage. See: “How much re­search is needed? – EL&U Meta”, “single-word-requests tag wiki”.
    – tchrist
    yesterday
















-3














i.e. product B could be purchased if you have product A or must be purchased together.



I remember this term, its on the tip of my tongue - going crazy over it. PLEASE HELP =(










share|improve this question







New contributor




Arthur Romanov is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











put on hold as off-topic by tchrist yesterday


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – tchrist

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • I don't fully understand the context. Do you mean that the producer / supplier won't sell you Product A unless you present proof that you already own Product B (or you're simultaneously buying both products)? What about if someone else previously bought both products, but his A is broken - can he offer to sell you his B (which is no use to him without a working A) on eBay?
    – FumbleFingers
    2 days ago










  • What immediately comes to mine is "prerequisite", in your given context. As in: Purchasing Item A is a prerequisite to purchase Item B. (but as FumbleFingers indicated, it's not really a feasible scenario)
    – Gwendolyn
    2 days ago












  • Are you talking about things that are packaged together or cases where the one item is an accessory and you just wouldn’t want to buy it without having the thing it goes with?
    – Laurel
    2 days ago










  • Thank you for ask­ing. Some in­for­ma­tion will help us give you the cor­rect an­swer. Please [ᴇᴅɪᴛ] to add de­tails of re­search you’ve done, es­pe­cially so­lu­tions you’ve al­ready re­jected, and why. In­clude the de­sired con­no­ta­tion, reg­is­ter (for­mal­ity), part of speech, and con­text in which it is to be used, and if pos­si­ble pro­vide the ex­act en­clos­ing sen­tence or pas­sage. See: “How much re­search is needed? – EL&U Meta”, “single-word-requests tag wiki”.
    – tchrist
    yesterday














-3












-3








-3







i.e. product B could be purchased if you have product A or must be purchased together.



I remember this term, its on the tip of my tongue - going crazy over it. PLEASE HELP =(










share|improve this question







New contributor




Arthur Romanov is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











i.e. product B could be purchased if you have product A or must be purchased together.



I remember this term, its on the tip of my tongue - going crazy over it. PLEASE HELP =(







single-word-requests phrase-requests






share|improve this question







New contributor




Arthur Romanov is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




Arthur Romanov is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




Arthur Romanov is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 days ago









Arthur Romanov

11




11




New contributor




Arthur Romanov is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Arthur Romanov is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Arthur Romanov is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




put on hold as off-topic by tchrist yesterday


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – tchrist

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




put on hold as off-topic by tchrist yesterday


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – tchrist

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • I don't fully understand the context. Do you mean that the producer / supplier won't sell you Product A unless you present proof that you already own Product B (or you're simultaneously buying both products)? What about if someone else previously bought both products, but his A is broken - can he offer to sell you his B (which is no use to him without a working A) on eBay?
    – FumbleFingers
    2 days ago










  • What immediately comes to mine is "prerequisite", in your given context. As in: Purchasing Item A is a prerequisite to purchase Item B. (but as FumbleFingers indicated, it's not really a feasible scenario)
    – Gwendolyn
    2 days ago












  • Are you talking about things that are packaged together or cases where the one item is an accessory and you just wouldn’t want to buy it without having the thing it goes with?
    – Laurel
    2 days ago










  • Thank you for ask­ing. Some in­for­ma­tion will help us give you the cor­rect an­swer. Please [ᴇᴅɪᴛ] to add de­tails of re­search you’ve done, es­pe­cially so­lu­tions you’ve al­ready re­jected, and why. In­clude the de­sired con­no­ta­tion, reg­is­ter (for­mal­ity), part of speech, and con­text in which it is to be used, and if pos­si­ble pro­vide the ex­act en­clos­ing sen­tence or pas­sage. See: “How much re­search is needed? – EL&U Meta”, “single-word-requests tag wiki”.
    – tchrist
    yesterday


















  • I don't fully understand the context. Do you mean that the producer / supplier won't sell you Product A unless you present proof that you already own Product B (or you're simultaneously buying both products)? What about if someone else previously bought both products, but his A is broken - can he offer to sell you his B (which is no use to him without a working A) on eBay?
    – FumbleFingers
    2 days ago










  • What immediately comes to mine is "prerequisite", in your given context. As in: Purchasing Item A is a prerequisite to purchase Item B. (but as FumbleFingers indicated, it's not really a feasible scenario)
    – Gwendolyn
    2 days ago












  • Are you talking about things that are packaged together or cases where the one item is an accessory and you just wouldn’t want to buy it without having the thing it goes with?
    – Laurel
    2 days ago










  • Thank you for ask­ing. Some in­for­ma­tion will help us give you the cor­rect an­swer. Please [ᴇᴅɪᴛ] to add de­tails of re­search you’ve done, es­pe­cially so­lu­tions you’ve al­ready re­jected, and why. In­clude the de­sired con­no­ta­tion, reg­is­ter (for­mal­ity), part of speech, and con­text in which it is to be used, and if pos­si­ble pro­vide the ex­act en­clos­ing sen­tence or pas­sage. See: “How much re­search is needed? – EL&U Meta”, “single-word-requests tag wiki”.
    – tchrist
    yesterday
















I don't fully understand the context. Do you mean that the producer / supplier won't sell you Product A unless you present proof that you already own Product B (or you're simultaneously buying both products)? What about if someone else previously bought both products, but his A is broken - can he offer to sell you his B (which is no use to him without a working A) on eBay?
– FumbleFingers
2 days ago




I don't fully understand the context. Do you mean that the producer / supplier won't sell you Product A unless you present proof that you already own Product B (or you're simultaneously buying both products)? What about if someone else previously bought both products, but his A is broken - can he offer to sell you his B (which is no use to him without a working A) on eBay?
– FumbleFingers
2 days ago












What immediately comes to mine is "prerequisite", in your given context. As in: Purchasing Item A is a prerequisite to purchase Item B. (but as FumbleFingers indicated, it's not really a feasible scenario)
– Gwendolyn
2 days ago






What immediately comes to mine is "prerequisite", in your given context. As in: Purchasing Item A is a prerequisite to purchase Item B. (but as FumbleFingers indicated, it's not really a feasible scenario)
– Gwendolyn
2 days ago














Are you talking about things that are packaged together or cases where the one item is an accessory and you just wouldn’t want to buy it without having the thing it goes with?
– Laurel
2 days ago




Are you talking about things that are packaged together or cases where the one item is an accessory and you just wouldn’t want to buy it without having the thing it goes with?
– Laurel
2 days ago












Thank you for ask­ing. Some in­for­ma­tion will help us give you the cor­rect an­swer. Please [ᴇᴅɪᴛ] to add de­tails of re­search you’ve done, es­pe­cially so­lu­tions you’ve al­ready re­jected, and why. In­clude the de­sired con­no­ta­tion, reg­is­ter (for­mal­ity), part of speech, and con­text in which it is to be used, and if pos­si­ble pro­vide the ex­act en­clos­ing sen­tence or pas­sage. See: “How much re­search is needed? – EL&U Meta”, “single-word-requests tag wiki”.
– tchrist
yesterday




Thank you for ask­ing. Some in­for­ma­tion will help us give you the cor­rect an­swer. Please [ᴇᴅɪᴛ] to add de­tails of re­search you’ve done, es­pe­cially so­lu­tions you’ve al­ready re­jected, and why. In­clude the de­sired con­no­ta­tion, reg­is­ter (for­mal­ity), part of speech, and con­text in which it is to be used, and if pos­si­ble pro­vide the ex­act en­clos­ing sen­tence or pas­sage. See: “How much re­search is needed? – EL&U Meta”, “single-word-requests tag wiki”.
– tchrist
yesterday















active

oldest

votes






















active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes

Popular posts from this blog

Paul Cézanne

UIScrollView CustomStickyHeader Resize height generates problems when scroll is too fast

Angular material date-picker (MatDatepicker) auto completes the date on focus out