If a blood avenger somehow gets into a city of refuge and kills the killer, is he subject to the death...












8















We know that a Goel haDam (blood avenger) has a special allowance to kill the rotzeach who accidentally killed his family member. The accidental rotzeach can avoid this fate by fleeing to an ir miklat, one of the designated cities of refuge.



But what if the Goel haDam is a shrewd/sneaky guy who is somehow able to gain access into this ir miklat and kills the rotzeach.



1) Do we say that he's a murderer, and thus subject to the death penalty, since the special allowance to kill expired once the rotzeach entered or is in the ir miklat?



OR



2) Do we say the allowance to kill only expires when the Kohen Gadol dies and the ir miklat is more of a "home base" (like when playing tag) and it would be the ir miklat at fault for not preventing this/having better security?



Basically, I'd like to better understanding of the parameters for this unbelievable exception of allowance to kill that the Torah grants a person.










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    I don't think I've ever heard a halachic discussion talk about the game of tag :)

    – DonielF
    Jan 9 at 21:22











  • I think the Goel Hadam is allowed to go into the ir miklat. He just can't kill the murderer there. Obviously if he's really mad you should take precautions, but that's just common sense and not based on any specific halacha of ir miklat. For that matter the same is true even after the Kohen Gadol dies.

    – Heshy
    2 days ago











  • @Heshy very interesting thanks! do you know if there's a mekor for that?

    – alicht
    2 days ago






  • 1





    @alicht I don't. But the protection extends to the techum of the city, and if there were 24 hour guard posts that itself would extend the techum, so it's pretty much impossible to keep the goel hadam out. Also, what would you do if the goel hadam accidentally kills somebody else?

    – Heshy
    2 days ago
















8















We know that a Goel haDam (blood avenger) has a special allowance to kill the rotzeach who accidentally killed his family member. The accidental rotzeach can avoid this fate by fleeing to an ir miklat, one of the designated cities of refuge.



But what if the Goel haDam is a shrewd/sneaky guy who is somehow able to gain access into this ir miklat and kills the rotzeach.



1) Do we say that he's a murderer, and thus subject to the death penalty, since the special allowance to kill expired once the rotzeach entered or is in the ir miklat?



OR



2) Do we say the allowance to kill only expires when the Kohen Gadol dies and the ir miklat is more of a "home base" (like when playing tag) and it would be the ir miklat at fault for not preventing this/having better security?



Basically, I'd like to better understanding of the parameters for this unbelievable exception of allowance to kill that the Torah grants a person.










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    I don't think I've ever heard a halachic discussion talk about the game of tag :)

    – DonielF
    Jan 9 at 21:22











  • I think the Goel Hadam is allowed to go into the ir miklat. He just can't kill the murderer there. Obviously if he's really mad you should take precautions, but that's just common sense and not based on any specific halacha of ir miklat. For that matter the same is true even after the Kohen Gadol dies.

    – Heshy
    2 days ago











  • @Heshy very interesting thanks! do you know if there's a mekor for that?

    – alicht
    2 days ago






  • 1





    @alicht I don't. But the protection extends to the techum of the city, and if there were 24 hour guard posts that itself would extend the techum, so it's pretty much impossible to keep the goel hadam out. Also, what would you do if the goel hadam accidentally kills somebody else?

    – Heshy
    2 days ago














8












8








8








We know that a Goel haDam (blood avenger) has a special allowance to kill the rotzeach who accidentally killed his family member. The accidental rotzeach can avoid this fate by fleeing to an ir miklat, one of the designated cities of refuge.



But what if the Goel haDam is a shrewd/sneaky guy who is somehow able to gain access into this ir miklat and kills the rotzeach.



1) Do we say that he's a murderer, and thus subject to the death penalty, since the special allowance to kill expired once the rotzeach entered or is in the ir miklat?



OR



2) Do we say the allowance to kill only expires when the Kohen Gadol dies and the ir miklat is more of a "home base" (like when playing tag) and it would be the ir miklat at fault for not preventing this/having better security?



Basically, I'd like to better understanding of the parameters for this unbelievable exception of allowance to kill that the Torah grants a person.










share|improve this question
















We know that a Goel haDam (blood avenger) has a special allowance to kill the rotzeach who accidentally killed his family member. The accidental rotzeach can avoid this fate by fleeing to an ir miklat, one of the designated cities of refuge.



But what if the Goel haDam is a shrewd/sneaky guy who is somehow able to gain access into this ir miklat and kills the rotzeach.



1) Do we say that he's a murderer, and thus subject to the death penalty, since the special allowance to kill expired once the rotzeach entered or is in the ir miklat?



OR



2) Do we say the allowance to kill only expires when the Kohen Gadol dies and the ir miklat is more of a "home base" (like when playing tag) and it would be the ir miklat at fault for not preventing this/having better security?



Basically, I'd like to better understanding of the parameters for this unbelievable exception of allowance to kill that the Torah grants a person.







halacha murder city-of-refuge






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jan 9 at 22:15









Monica Cellio

36.3k577252




36.3k577252










asked Jan 9 at 19:33









alichtalicht

63515




63515








  • 1





    I don't think I've ever heard a halachic discussion talk about the game of tag :)

    – DonielF
    Jan 9 at 21:22











  • I think the Goel Hadam is allowed to go into the ir miklat. He just can't kill the murderer there. Obviously if he's really mad you should take precautions, but that's just common sense and not based on any specific halacha of ir miklat. For that matter the same is true even after the Kohen Gadol dies.

    – Heshy
    2 days ago











  • @Heshy very interesting thanks! do you know if there's a mekor for that?

    – alicht
    2 days ago






  • 1





    @alicht I don't. But the protection extends to the techum of the city, and if there were 24 hour guard posts that itself would extend the techum, so it's pretty much impossible to keep the goel hadam out. Also, what would you do if the goel hadam accidentally kills somebody else?

    – Heshy
    2 days ago














  • 1





    I don't think I've ever heard a halachic discussion talk about the game of tag :)

    – DonielF
    Jan 9 at 21:22











  • I think the Goel Hadam is allowed to go into the ir miklat. He just can't kill the murderer there. Obviously if he's really mad you should take precautions, but that's just common sense and not based on any specific halacha of ir miklat. For that matter the same is true even after the Kohen Gadol dies.

    – Heshy
    2 days ago











  • @Heshy very interesting thanks! do you know if there's a mekor for that?

    – alicht
    2 days ago






  • 1





    @alicht I don't. But the protection extends to the techum of the city, and if there were 24 hour guard posts that itself would extend the techum, so it's pretty much impossible to keep the goel hadam out. Also, what would you do if the goel hadam accidentally kills somebody else?

    – Heshy
    2 days ago








1




1





I don't think I've ever heard a halachic discussion talk about the game of tag :)

– DonielF
Jan 9 at 21:22





I don't think I've ever heard a halachic discussion talk about the game of tag :)

– DonielF
Jan 9 at 21:22













I think the Goel Hadam is allowed to go into the ir miklat. He just can't kill the murderer there. Obviously if he's really mad you should take precautions, but that's just common sense and not based on any specific halacha of ir miklat. For that matter the same is true even after the Kohen Gadol dies.

– Heshy
2 days ago





I think the Goel Hadam is allowed to go into the ir miklat. He just can't kill the murderer there. Obviously if he's really mad you should take precautions, but that's just common sense and not based on any specific halacha of ir miklat. For that matter the same is true even after the Kohen Gadol dies.

– Heshy
2 days ago













@Heshy very interesting thanks! do you know if there's a mekor for that?

– alicht
2 days ago





@Heshy very interesting thanks! do you know if there's a mekor for that?

– alicht
2 days ago




1




1





@alicht I don't. But the protection extends to the techum of the city, and if there were 24 hour guard posts that itself would extend the techum, so it's pretty much impossible to keep the goel hadam out. Also, what would you do if the goel hadam accidentally kills somebody else?

– Heshy
2 days ago





@alicht I don't. But the protection extends to the techum of the city, and if there were 24 hour guard posts that itself would extend the techum, so it's pretty much impossible to keep the goel hadam out. Also, what would you do if the goel hadam accidentally kills somebody else?

– Heshy
2 days ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















18














The Rambam (Hilchot Rotzeach uShmirat Nefesh 5:11) writes




If the [unintentional] killer is slain within the Sabbath limits of the city of
refuge, the one who slayed him should be executed.




see also end of 5:12




Thus, if a person kills unintentionally and takes refuge at the altar,
and the blood redeemer kills him there, he should be executed as if he
killed him in a city of refuge
.







share|improve this answer































    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    18














    The Rambam (Hilchot Rotzeach uShmirat Nefesh 5:11) writes




    If the [unintentional] killer is slain within the Sabbath limits of the city of
    refuge, the one who slayed him should be executed.




    see also end of 5:12




    Thus, if a person kills unintentionally and takes refuge at the altar,
    and the blood redeemer kills him there, he should be executed as if he
    killed him in a city of refuge
    .







    share|improve this answer




























      18














      The Rambam (Hilchot Rotzeach uShmirat Nefesh 5:11) writes




      If the [unintentional] killer is slain within the Sabbath limits of the city of
      refuge, the one who slayed him should be executed.




      see also end of 5:12




      Thus, if a person kills unintentionally and takes refuge at the altar,
      and the blood redeemer kills him there, he should be executed as if he
      killed him in a city of refuge
      .







      share|improve this answer


























        18












        18








        18







        The Rambam (Hilchot Rotzeach uShmirat Nefesh 5:11) writes




        If the [unintentional] killer is slain within the Sabbath limits of the city of
        refuge, the one who slayed him should be executed.




        see also end of 5:12




        Thus, if a person kills unintentionally and takes refuge at the altar,
        and the blood redeemer kills him there, he should be executed as if he
        killed him in a city of refuge
        .







        share|improve this answer













        The Rambam (Hilchot Rotzeach uShmirat Nefesh 5:11) writes




        If the [unintentional] killer is slain within the Sabbath limits of the city of
        refuge, the one who slayed him should be executed.




        see also end of 5:12




        Thus, if a person kills unintentionally and takes refuge at the altar,
        and the blood redeemer kills him there, he should be executed as if he
        killed him in a city of refuge
        .








        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Jan 9 at 19:43









        mblochmbloch

        22.7k442106




        22.7k442106















            Popular posts from this blog

            "Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

            Alcedinidae

            Origin of the phrase “under your belt”?