violated - parent key not found error
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}
I have the following error appearing:
INSERT INTO GroupMembers VALUES ('Goldfrat', 'Simon Palm')
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-02291: integrity constraint (SHAHA1.IAM_IS_GROUP_FK) violated - parent key
not found
The constraint in the GroupMembers
table is:
CONSTRAINT iam_is_group_fk FOREIGN KEY(is_group) REFERENCES Members(group_name)
The Members Table looks like this:
CREATE TABLE Members (
group_name VARCHAR2(40),
CONSTRAINT g_id_pk PRIMARY KEY(group_name),
CONSTRAINT m_group_name_fk FOREIGN KEY(group_name) REFERENCES Artist(artistic_name));
All of the tables are created fine until it comes to creating the GroupMembers
table. Anyone have any ideas? I've been scratching for quite a while.
sql database oracle
add a comment |
I have the following error appearing:
INSERT INTO GroupMembers VALUES ('Goldfrat', 'Simon Palm')
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-02291: integrity constraint (SHAHA1.IAM_IS_GROUP_FK) violated - parent key
not found
The constraint in the GroupMembers
table is:
CONSTRAINT iam_is_group_fk FOREIGN KEY(is_group) REFERENCES Members(group_name)
The Members Table looks like this:
CREATE TABLE Members (
group_name VARCHAR2(40),
CONSTRAINT g_id_pk PRIMARY KEY(group_name),
CONSTRAINT m_group_name_fk FOREIGN KEY(group_name) REFERENCES Artist(artistic_name));
All of the tables are created fine until it comes to creating the GroupMembers
table. Anyone have any ideas? I've been scratching for quite a while.
sql database oracle
I'm scratching for the error,too. I've disabled the foreign constraint and did some insert and delete actions. After I updated, I could not enable this foreign constraint. It said ORA-02298: cannot validate (PRODUSR.SYS_C0037867) - parent keys not found. But I checked many times and still cannot find out any records not in parent table.
– user3572072
Apr 25 '14 at 8:11
add a comment |
I have the following error appearing:
INSERT INTO GroupMembers VALUES ('Goldfrat', 'Simon Palm')
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-02291: integrity constraint (SHAHA1.IAM_IS_GROUP_FK) violated - parent key
not found
The constraint in the GroupMembers
table is:
CONSTRAINT iam_is_group_fk FOREIGN KEY(is_group) REFERENCES Members(group_name)
The Members Table looks like this:
CREATE TABLE Members (
group_name VARCHAR2(40),
CONSTRAINT g_id_pk PRIMARY KEY(group_name),
CONSTRAINT m_group_name_fk FOREIGN KEY(group_name) REFERENCES Artist(artistic_name));
All of the tables are created fine until it comes to creating the GroupMembers
table. Anyone have any ideas? I've been scratching for quite a while.
sql database oracle
I have the following error appearing:
INSERT INTO GroupMembers VALUES ('Goldfrat', 'Simon Palm')
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-02291: integrity constraint (SHAHA1.IAM_IS_GROUP_FK) violated - parent key
not found
The constraint in the GroupMembers
table is:
CONSTRAINT iam_is_group_fk FOREIGN KEY(is_group) REFERENCES Members(group_name)
The Members Table looks like this:
CREATE TABLE Members (
group_name VARCHAR2(40),
CONSTRAINT g_id_pk PRIMARY KEY(group_name),
CONSTRAINT m_group_name_fk FOREIGN KEY(group_name) REFERENCES Artist(artistic_name));
All of the tables are created fine until it comes to creating the GroupMembers
table. Anyone have any ideas? I've been scratching for quite a while.
sql database oracle
sql database oracle
edited Oct 28 '13 at 11:06
Kiquenet
7,18627110200
7,18627110200
asked Nov 22 '12 at 18:23
AkshaiShahAkshaiShah
1,88072737
1,88072737
I'm scratching for the error,too. I've disabled the foreign constraint and did some insert and delete actions. After I updated, I could not enable this foreign constraint. It said ORA-02298: cannot validate (PRODUSR.SYS_C0037867) - parent keys not found. But I checked many times and still cannot find out any records not in parent table.
– user3572072
Apr 25 '14 at 8:11
add a comment |
I'm scratching for the error,too. I've disabled the foreign constraint and did some insert and delete actions. After I updated, I could not enable this foreign constraint. It said ORA-02298: cannot validate (PRODUSR.SYS_C0037867) - parent keys not found. But I checked many times and still cannot find out any records not in parent table.
– user3572072
Apr 25 '14 at 8:11
I'm scratching for the error,too. I've disabled the foreign constraint and did some insert and delete actions. After I updated, I could not enable this foreign constraint. It said ORA-02298: cannot validate (PRODUSR.SYS_C0037867) - parent keys not found. But I checked many times and still cannot find out any records not in parent table.
– user3572072
Apr 25 '14 at 8:11
I'm scratching for the error,too. I've disabled the foreign constraint and did some insert and delete actions. After I updated, I could not enable this foreign constraint. It said ORA-02298: cannot validate (PRODUSR.SYS_C0037867) - parent keys not found. But I checked many times and still cannot find out any records not in parent table.
– user3572072
Apr 25 '14 at 8:11
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
The problem is that
CONSTRAINT iam_is_group_fk FOREIGN KEY(is_group) REFERENCES Members(group_name);
references the table Members on the group_name field.
This means that the field is_group on the table GroupMembers
must have an identical value on the table Members
and group_name
field.
In my opinion this is bad practice.
First of all you should have a primary key field on the table GroupMembers. You should not store the names of the group members in the table GroupMembers, but their corresponding id from the table Members.
Also the table Members, should look something like this:
CREATE TABLE Members (
member_id NUMBER PRIMARY KEY
member_name VARCHAR2(40),
CONSTRAINT g_id_pk PRIMARY KEY(member_id),
CONSTRAINT m_group_name_fk FOREIGN KEY(group_name) REFERENCES Artist(artistic_name));
Then on the table GroupMembers
, I suppose you want to associate some members to their set of groups and back, so you should do something like this:
CREATE TABLE GroupMembers (
member_id NUMBER,
group_id NUMBER
)
CONSTRAINT iam_is_member_fk FOREIGN KEY(member_id) REFERENCES Members(member_id);
CONSTRAINT iam_is_member_fk FOREIGN KEY(group_id) REFERENCES Groups(group_id);
Supposing that you have a table Groups
containing all the group details, with the primary key
stored as number
, and name group_id
.
Always remeber that each table must have a primary key
. It is good practice for this key to be a number.
So by having member_id in Members
, group_id
in Groups
, you can create a many to many relationship in GroupMembers
. Also, put a unique index on this table so you don't have duplicates ( the same member associated to the same id several times ).
Look at this example linking users to roles. It is the same case:
add a comment |
error is
you have to use same column name which is defined in reference table
i.e
CONSTRAINT m_group_name_fk FOREIGN KEY(group_name) REFERENCES Artist(group_name)
That group_name
should be define as primary key
in Artist
Table.
No, you don't, have a look at the accepted answer. Moreover, please use the code block in your answers.
– b.enoit.be
Feb 2 '15 at 13:05
add a comment |
Order in which you are insert is the reason for the error.
Members(group_name)
does not contain Goldfrat
. If this is not true then it's not there in the table Artists
.
I'm inserting that line after i insert everything else
– AkshaiShah
Nov 22 '12 at 18:29
Ah yes of course, i missed that completely
– AkshaiShah
Nov 22 '12 at 18:34
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f13518246%2fviolated-parent-key-not-found-error%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The problem is that
CONSTRAINT iam_is_group_fk FOREIGN KEY(is_group) REFERENCES Members(group_name);
references the table Members on the group_name field.
This means that the field is_group on the table GroupMembers
must have an identical value on the table Members
and group_name
field.
In my opinion this is bad practice.
First of all you should have a primary key field on the table GroupMembers. You should not store the names of the group members in the table GroupMembers, but their corresponding id from the table Members.
Also the table Members, should look something like this:
CREATE TABLE Members (
member_id NUMBER PRIMARY KEY
member_name VARCHAR2(40),
CONSTRAINT g_id_pk PRIMARY KEY(member_id),
CONSTRAINT m_group_name_fk FOREIGN KEY(group_name) REFERENCES Artist(artistic_name));
Then on the table GroupMembers
, I suppose you want to associate some members to their set of groups and back, so you should do something like this:
CREATE TABLE GroupMembers (
member_id NUMBER,
group_id NUMBER
)
CONSTRAINT iam_is_member_fk FOREIGN KEY(member_id) REFERENCES Members(member_id);
CONSTRAINT iam_is_member_fk FOREIGN KEY(group_id) REFERENCES Groups(group_id);
Supposing that you have a table Groups
containing all the group details, with the primary key
stored as number
, and name group_id
.
Always remeber that each table must have a primary key
. It is good practice for this key to be a number.
So by having member_id in Members
, group_id
in Groups
, you can create a many to many relationship in GroupMembers
. Also, put a unique index on this table so you don't have duplicates ( the same member associated to the same id several times ).
Look at this example linking users to roles. It is the same case:
add a comment |
The problem is that
CONSTRAINT iam_is_group_fk FOREIGN KEY(is_group) REFERENCES Members(group_name);
references the table Members on the group_name field.
This means that the field is_group on the table GroupMembers
must have an identical value on the table Members
and group_name
field.
In my opinion this is bad practice.
First of all you should have a primary key field on the table GroupMembers. You should not store the names of the group members in the table GroupMembers, but their corresponding id from the table Members.
Also the table Members, should look something like this:
CREATE TABLE Members (
member_id NUMBER PRIMARY KEY
member_name VARCHAR2(40),
CONSTRAINT g_id_pk PRIMARY KEY(member_id),
CONSTRAINT m_group_name_fk FOREIGN KEY(group_name) REFERENCES Artist(artistic_name));
Then on the table GroupMembers
, I suppose you want to associate some members to their set of groups and back, so you should do something like this:
CREATE TABLE GroupMembers (
member_id NUMBER,
group_id NUMBER
)
CONSTRAINT iam_is_member_fk FOREIGN KEY(member_id) REFERENCES Members(member_id);
CONSTRAINT iam_is_member_fk FOREIGN KEY(group_id) REFERENCES Groups(group_id);
Supposing that you have a table Groups
containing all the group details, with the primary key
stored as number
, and name group_id
.
Always remeber that each table must have a primary key
. It is good practice for this key to be a number.
So by having member_id in Members
, group_id
in Groups
, you can create a many to many relationship in GroupMembers
. Also, put a unique index on this table so you don't have duplicates ( the same member associated to the same id several times ).
Look at this example linking users to roles. It is the same case:
add a comment |
The problem is that
CONSTRAINT iam_is_group_fk FOREIGN KEY(is_group) REFERENCES Members(group_name);
references the table Members on the group_name field.
This means that the field is_group on the table GroupMembers
must have an identical value on the table Members
and group_name
field.
In my opinion this is bad practice.
First of all you should have a primary key field on the table GroupMembers. You should not store the names of the group members in the table GroupMembers, but their corresponding id from the table Members.
Also the table Members, should look something like this:
CREATE TABLE Members (
member_id NUMBER PRIMARY KEY
member_name VARCHAR2(40),
CONSTRAINT g_id_pk PRIMARY KEY(member_id),
CONSTRAINT m_group_name_fk FOREIGN KEY(group_name) REFERENCES Artist(artistic_name));
Then on the table GroupMembers
, I suppose you want to associate some members to their set of groups and back, so you should do something like this:
CREATE TABLE GroupMembers (
member_id NUMBER,
group_id NUMBER
)
CONSTRAINT iam_is_member_fk FOREIGN KEY(member_id) REFERENCES Members(member_id);
CONSTRAINT iam_is_member_fk FOREIGN KEY(group_id) REFERENCES Groups(group_id);
Supposing that you have a table Groups
containing all the group details, with the primary key
stored as number
, and name group_id
.
Always remeber that each table must have a primary key
. It is good practice for this key to be a number.
So by having member_id in Members
, group_id
in Groups
, you can create a many to many relationship in GroupMembers
. Also, put a unique index on this table so you don't have duplicates ( the same member associated to the same id several times ).
Look at this example linking users to roles. It is the same case:
The problem is that
CONSTRAINT iam_is_group_fk FOREIGN KEY(is_group) REFERENCES Members(group_name);
references the table Members on the group_name field.
This means that the field is_group on the table GroupMembers
must have an identical value on the table Members
and group_name
field.
In my opinion this is bad practice.
First of all you should have a primary key field on the table GroupMembers. You should not store the names of the group members in the table GroupMembers, but their corresponding id from the table Members.
Also the table Members, should look something like this:
CREATE TABLE Members (
member_id NUMBER PRIMARY KEY
member_name VARCHAR2(40),
CONSTRAINT g_id_pk PRIMARY KEY(member_id),
CONSTRAINT m_group_name_fk FOREIGN KEY(group_name) REFERENCES Artist(artistic_name));
Then on the table GroupMembers
, I suppose you want to associate some members to their set of groups and back, so you should do something like this:
CREATE TABLE GroupMembers (
member_id NUMBER,
group_id NUMBER
)
CONSTRAINT iam_is_member_fk FOREIGN KEY(member_id) REFERENCES Members(member_id);
CONSTRAINT iam_is_member_fk FOREIGN KEY(group_id) REFERENCES Groups(group_id);
Supposing that you have a table Groups
containing all the group details, with the primary key
stored as number
, and name group_id
.
Always remeber that each table must have a primary key
. It is good practice for this key to be a number.
So by having member_id in Members
, group_id
in Groups
, you can create a many to many relationship in GroupMembers
. Also, put a unique index on this table so you don't have duplicates ( the same member associated to the same id several times ).
Look at this example linking users to roles. It is the same case:
edited Nov 23 '18 at 17:59
Michu93
93911233
93911233
answered Nov 22 '12 at 18:41
ionutabionutab
300216
300216
add a comment |
add a comment |
error is
you have to use same column name which is defined in reference table
i.e
CONSTRAINT m_group_name_fk FOREIGN KEY(group_name) REFERENCES Artist(group_name)
That group_name
should be define as primary key
in Artist
Table.
No, you don't, have a look at the accepted answer. Moreover, please use the code block in your answers.
– b.enoit.be
Feb 2 '15 at 13:05
add a comment |
error is
you have to use same column name which is defined in reference table
i.e
CONSTRAINT m_group_name_fk FOREIGN KEY(group_name) REFERENCES Artist(group_name)
That group_name
should be define as primary key
in Artist
Table.
No, you don't, have a look at the accepted answer. Moreover, please use the code block in your answers.
– b.enoit.be
Feb 2 '15 at 13:05
add a comment |
error is
you have to use same column name which is defined in reference table
i.e
CONSTRAINT m_group_name_fk FOREIGN KEY(group_name) REFERENCES Artist(group_name)
That group_name
should be define as primary key
in Artist
Table.
error is
you have to use same column name which is defined in reference table
i.e
CONSTRAINT m_group_name_fk FOREIGN KEY(group_name) REFERENCES Artist(group_name)
That group_name
should be define as primary key
in Artist
Table.
edited Nov 23 '18 at 16:03
Michu93
93911233
93911233
answered Feb 2 '15 at 12:41
srinathsrinath
1
1
No, you don't, have a look at the accepted answer. Moreover, please use the code block in your answers.
– b.enoit.be
Feb 2 '15 at 13:05
add a comment |
No, you don't, have a look at the accepted answer. Moreover, please use the code block in your answers.
– b.enoit.be
Feb 2 '15 at 13:05
No, you don't, have a look at the accepted answer. Moreover, please use the code block in your answers.
– b.enoit.be
Feb 2 '15 at 13:05
No, you don't, have a look at the accepted answer. Moreover, please use the code block in your answers.
– b.enoit.be
Feb 2 '15 at 13:05
add a comment |
Order in which you are insert is the reason for the error.
Members(group_name)
does not contain Goldfrat
. If this is not true then it's not there in the table Artists
.
I'm inserting that line after i insert everything else
– AkshaiShah
Nov 22 '12 at 18:29
Ah yes of course, i missed that completely
– AkshaiShah
Nov 22 '12 at 18:34
add a comment |
Order in which you are insert is the reason for the error.
Members(group_name)
does not contain Goldfrat
. If this is not true then it's not there in the table Artists
.
I'm inserting that line after i insert everything else
– AkshaiShah
Nov 22 '12 at 18:29
Ah yes of course, i missed that completely
– AkshaiShah
Nov 22 '12 at 18:34
add a comment |
Order in which you are insert is the reason for the error.
Members(group_name)
does not contain Goldfrat
. If this is not true then it's not there in the table Artists
.
Order in which you are insert is the reason for the error.
Members(group_name)
does not contain Goldfrat
. If this is not true then it's not there in the table Artists
.
edited Nov 23 '18 at 17:48
Michu93
93911233
93911233
answered Nov 22 '12 at 18:27
Shamis ShukoorShamis Shukoor
2,06722131
2,06722131
I'm inserting that line after i insert everything else
– AkshaiShah
Nov 22 '12 at 18:29
Ah yes of course, i missed that completely
– AkshaiShah
Nov 22 '12 at 18:34
add a comment |
I'm inserting that line after i insert everything else
– AkshaiShah
Nov 22 '12 at 18:29
Ah yes of course, i missed that completely
– AkshaiShah
Nov 22 '12 at 18:34
I'm inserting that line after i insert everything else
– AkshaiShah
Nov 22 '12 at 18:29
I'm inserting that line after i insert everything else
– AkshaiShah
Nov 22 '12 at 18:29
Ah yes of course, i missed that completely
– AkshaiShah
Nov 22 '12 at 18:34
Ah yes of course, i missed that completely
– AkshaiShah
Nov 22 '12 at 18:34
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f13518246%2fviolated-parent-key-not-found-error%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
I'm scratching for the error,too. I've disabled the foreign constraint and did some insert and delete actions. After I updated, I could not enable this foreign constraint. It said ORA-02298: cannot validate (PRODUSR.SYS_C0037867) - parent keys not found. But I checked many times and still cannot find out any records not in parent table.
– user3572072
Apr 25 '14 at 8:11