Do UK voters know if their MP will be the Speaker of the House?












9















Regarding the office of the Speaker of the House of Commons in the UK, I am wondering if voters know at election time if the MP they are voting for will become the Speaker (in which case, they will receive a reduced level of representation, since the speaker does not normally cast a vote)?



If so, is there any evidence that such knowledge can affect the outcome of the constituency vote (for example, if the constituents did not wish their MP to be the Speaker)?










share|improve this question



























    9















    Regarding the office of the Speaker of the House of Commons in the UK, I am wondering if voters know at election time if the MP they are voting for will become the Speaker (in which case, they will receive a reduced level of representation, since the speaker does not normally cast a vote)?



    If so, is there any evidence that such knowledge can affect the outcome of the constituency vote (for example, if the constituents did not wish their MP to be the Speaker)?










    share|improve this question

























      9












      9








      9








      Regarding the office of the Speaker of the House of Commons in the UK, I am wondering if voters know at election time if the MP they are voting for will become the Speaker (in which case, they will receive a reduced level of representation, since the speaker does not normally cast a vote)?



      If so, is there any evidence that such knowledge can affect the outcome of the constituency vote (for example, if the constituents did not wish their MP to be the Speaker)?










      share|improve this question














      Regarding the office of the Speaker of the House of Commons in the UK, I am wondering if voters know at election time if the MP they are voting for will become the Speaker (in which case, they will receive a reduced level of representation, since the speaker does not normally cast a vote)?



      If so, is there any evidence that such knowledge can affect the outcome of the constituency vote (for example, if the constituents did not wish their MP to be the Speaker)?







      united-kingdom house-of-commons speaker






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Apr 3 at 18:24









      Time4TeaTime4Tea

      867619




      867619






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          15














          If the Speaker is seeking to continue in the position from the previous Parliament, then he or she runs as the Speaker rather than for a party (since the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act [2000] listed as "The Speaker seeking re-election"). Major parties don't run candidates against them, so there is not usually any meaningful opposition to beat.



          If you instead mean MPs who run normally, then take up the position of the Speaker, the role is an elected one, even if historically a consensus on a single candidate happened before the actual election. As such, a prospective MP could only announce that they were willing to be nominated, and there is no formal requirement for them to do so.



          It's worth noting that while the Speaker (and his or her deputies) does not normally vote, doing so only to break a tie, they can hold considerable soft power, Particularly in a hung parliament, as currently exists. As such a constituent with personal issues might find that the Speaker is better able to help them than a junior backbencher would be.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 4





            "the role is an elected one" -- clarification: elected by MPs.

            – Roger Lipscombe
            Apr 4 at 7:38








          • 2





            a prospective MP could only announce that they were willing to be nominated. As I understand it, the candidate could not even do that. The speaker is chosen by the other MPs and is expected to feign reluctance at being chosen.

            – Buh Buh
            Apr 4 at 9:18





















          5














          If a Speaker hasn't resigned the position prior to a General Election, and is seeking to be re-elected as an MP, then the electorate will know. Convention even says that their "party" allegiance on the ballot paper should say "The Speaker seeking re-election".



          If there isn't a sitting Speaker seeking re-election as an MP then the electorate will not know as the decision is made at the start of each Parliament.



          The Parliamentary website covers this.



          Are some voters concerned by this? The answer is yes. I can't, however, find any case where these concerns materially affected a constituency election result though. In the linked case, for example, John Bercow was re-elected with a healthy majority.






          share|improve this answer


























          • There's a third option, which is probably more common than the one in the 2nd paragraph: if the sitting Speaker resigns in the middle of a parliament, and a new one is then elected. Obviously the new Speaker will have been a regular MP at the previous election (while the previous Speaker will have stood as the Speaker seeking re-election).

            – Steve Melnikoff
            Apr 3 at 22:10











          • The cases where "it materially affected a result" are exactly the cases in which the Speaker uses their casting vote. This most recently happened today.

            – Kevin
            Apr 4 at 2:39











          • @Kevin I meant that the voters’ concerns affected the election result. I’ Try to word that better.

            – Alex
            Apr 4 at 6:42






          • 1





            Yes, Bercow was re-elected with a healthy majority, but the fact that none of the major parties (Conservatives - though he was a Conservative before becoming the Speaker, Labour, and Lib Dems) stood candidates in that election meant there was no serious opposition either.

            – Christopher
            Apr 4 at 9:01











          • I can understand constituency voters being disgruntled. If the Speaker's re-election is practically guaranteed, then they are essentially being stripped of any meaningful choice. It seems quite undemocratic.

            – Time4Tea
            Apr 4 at 12:39












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "475"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f40211%2fdo-uk-voters-know-if-their-mp-will-be-the-speaker-of-the-house%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          15














          If the Speaker is seeking to continue in the position from the previous Parliament, then he or she runs as the Speaker rather than for a party (since the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act [2000] listed as "The Speaker seeking re-election"). Major parties don't run candidates against them, so there is not usually any meaningful opposition to beat.



          If you instead mean MPs who run normally, then take up the position of the Speaker, the role is an elected one, even if historically a consensus on a single candidate happened before the actual election. As such, a prospective MP could only announce that they were willing to be nominated, and there is no formal requirement for them to do so.



          It's worth noting that while the Speaker (and his or her deputies) does not normally vote, doing so only to break a tie, they can hold considerable soft power, Particularly in a hung parliament, as currently exists. As such a constituent with personal issues might find that the Speaker is better able to help them than a junior backbencher would be.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 4





            "the role is an elected one" -- clarification: elected by MPs.

            – Roger Lipscombe
            Apr 4 at 7:38








          • 2





            a prospective MP could only announce that they were willing to be nominated. As I understand it, the candidate could not even do that. The speaker is chosen by the other MPs and is expected to feign reluctance at being chosen.

            – Buh Buh
            Apr 4 at 9:18


















          15














          If the Speaker is seeking to continue in the position from the previous Parliament, then he or she runs as the Speaker rather than for a party (since the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act [2000] listed as "The Speaker seeking re-election"). Major parties don't run candidates against them, so there is not usually any meaningful opposition to beat.



          If you instead mean MPs who run normally, then take up the position of the Speaker, the role is an elected one, even if historically a consensus on a single candidate happened before the actual election. As such, a prospective MP could only announce that they were willing to be nominated, and there is no formal requirement for them to do so.



          It's worth noting that while the Speaker (and his or her deputies) does not normally vote, doing so only to break a tie, they can hold considerable soft power, Particularly in a hung parliament, as currently exists. As such a constituent with personal issues might find that the Speaker is better able to help them than a junior backbencher would be.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 4





            "the role is an elected one" -- clarification: elected by MPs.

            – Roger Lipscombe
            Apr 4 at 7:38








          • 2





            a prospective MP could only announce that they were willing to be nominated. As I understand it, the candidate could not even do that. The speaker is chosen by the other MPs and is expected to feign reluctance at being chosen.

            – Buh Buh
            Apr 4 at 9:18
















          15












          15








          15







          If the Speaker is seeking to continue in the position from the previous Parliament, then he or she runs as the Speaker rather than for a party (since the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act [2000] listed as "The Speaker seeking re-election"). Major parties don't run candidates against them, so there is not usually any meaningful opposition to beat.



          If you instead mean MPs who run normally, then take up the position of the Speaker, the role is an elected one, even if historically a consensus on a single candidate happened before the actual election. As such, a prospective MP could only announce that they were willing to be nominated, and there is no formal requirement for them to do so.



          It's worth noting that while the Speaker (and his or her deputies) does not normally vote, doing so only to break a tie, they can hold considerable soft power, Particularly in a hung parliament, as currently exists. As such a constituent with personal issues might find that the Speaker is better able to help them than a junior backbencher would be.






          share|improve this answer













          If the Speaker is seeking to continue in the position from the previous Parliament, then he or she runs as the Speaker rather than for a party (since the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act [2000] listed as "The Speaker seeking re-election"). Major parties don't run candidates against them, so there is not usually any meaningful opposition to beat.



          If you instead mean MPs who run normally, then take up the position of the Speaker, the role is an elected one, even if historically a consensus on a single candidate happened before the actual election. As such, a prospective MP could only announce that they were willing to be nominated, and there is no formal requirement for them to do so.



          It's worth noting that while the Speaker (and his or her deputies) does not normally vote, doing so only to break a tie, they can hold considerable soft power, Particularly in a hung parliament, as currently exists. As such a constituent with personal issues might find that the Speaker is better able to help them than a junior backbencher would be.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Apr 3 at 18:55









          origimboorigimbo

          13.9k23355




          13.9k23355








          • 4





            "the role is an elected one" -- clarification: elected by MPs.

            – Roger Lipscombe
            Apr 4 at 7:38








          • 2





            a prospective MP could only announce that they were willing to be nominated. As I understand it, the candidate could not even do that. The speaker is chosen by the other MPs and is expected to feign reluctance at being chosen.

            – Buh Buh
            Apr 4 at 9:18
















          • 4





            "the role is an elected one" -- clarification: elected by MPs.

            – Roger Lipscombe
            Apr 4 at 7:38








          • 2





            a prospective MP could only announce that they were willing to be nominated. As I understand it, the candidate could not even do that. The speaker is chosen by the other MPs and is expected to feign reluctance at being chosen.

            – Buh Buh
            Apr 4 at 9:18










          4




          4





          "the role is an elected one" -- clarification: elected by MPs.

          – Roger Lipscombe
          Apr 4 at 7:38







          "the role is an elected one" -- clarification: elected by MPs.

          – Roger Lipscombe
          Apr 4 at 7:38






          2




          2





          a prospective MP could only announce that they were willing to be nominated. As I understand it, the candidate could not even do that. The speaker is chosen by the other MPs and is expected to feign reluctance at being chosen.

          – Buh Buh
          Apr 4 at 9:18







          a prospective MP could only announce that they were willing to be nominated. As I understand it, the candidate could not even do that. The speaker is chosen by the other MPs and is expected to feign reluctance at being chosen.

          – Buh Buh
          Apr 4 at 9:18













          5














          If a Speaker hasn't resigned the position prior to a General Election, and is seeking to be re-elected as an MP, then the electorate will know. Convention even says that their "party" allegiance on the ballot paper should say "The Speaker seeking re-election".



          If there isn't a sitting Speaker seeking re-election as an MP then the electorate will not know as the decision is made at the start of each Parliament.



          The Parliamentary website covers this.



          Are some voters concerned by this? The answer is yes. I can't, however, find any case where these concerns materially affected a constituency election result though. In the linked case, for example, John Bercow was re-elected with a healthy majority.






          share|improve this answer


























          • There's a third option, which is probably more common than the one in the 2nd paragraph: if the sitting Speaker resigns in the middle of a parliament, and a new one is then elected. Obviously the new Speaker will have been a regular MP at the previous election (while the previous Speaker will have stood as the Speaker seeking re-election).

            – Steve Melnikoff
            Apr 3 at 22:10











          • The cases where "it materially affected a result" are exactly the cases in which the Speaker uses their casting vote. This most recently happened today.

            – Kevin
            Apr 4 at 2:39











          • @Kevin I meant that the voters’ concerns affected the election result. I’ Try to word that better.

            – Alex
            Apr 4 at 6:42






          • 1





            Yes, Bercow was re-elected with a healthy majority, but the fact that none of the major parties (Conservatives - though he was a Conservative before becoming the Speaker, Labour, and Lib Dems) stood candidates in that election meant there was no serious opposition either.

            – Christopher
            Apr 4 at 9:01











          • I can understand constituency voters being disgruntled. If the Speaker's re-election is practically guaranteed, then they are essentially being stripped of any meaningful choice. It seems quite undemocratic.

            – Time4Tea
            Apr 4 at 12:39
















          5














          If a Speaker hasn't resigned the position prior to a General Election, and is seeking to be re-elected as an MP, then the electorate will know. Convention even says that their "party" allegiance on the ballot paper should say "The Speaker seeking re-election".



          If there isn't a sitting Speaker seeking re-election as an MP then the electorate will not know as the decision is made at the start of each Parliament.



          The Parliamentary website covers this.



          Are some voters concerned by this? The answer is yes. I can't, however, find any case where these concerns materially affected a constituency election result though. In the linked case, for example, John Bercow was re-elected with a healthy majority.






          share|improve this answer


























          • There's a third option, which is probably more common than the one in the 2nd paragraph: if the sitting Speaker resigns in the middle of a parliament, and a new one is then elected. Obviously the new Speaker will have been a regular MP at the previous election (while the previous Speaker will have stood as the Speaker seeking re-election).

            – Steve Melnikoff
            Apr 3 at 22:10











          • The cases where "it materially affected a result" are exactly the cases in which the Speaker uses their casting vote. This most recently happened today.

            – Kevin
            Apr 4 at 2:39











          • @Kevin I meant that the voters’ concerns affected the election result. I’ Try to word that better.

            – Alex
            Apr 4 at 6:42






          • 1





            Yes, Bercow was re-elected with a healthy majority, but the fact that none of the major parties (Conservatives - though he was a Conservative before becoming the Speaker, Labour, and Lib Dems) stood candidates in that election meant there was no serious opposition either.

            – Christopher
            Apr 4 at 9:01











          • I can understand constituency voters being disgruntled. If the Speaker's re-election is practically guaranteed, then they are essentially being stripped of any meaningful choice. It seems quite undemocratic.

            – Time4Tea
            Apr 4 at 12:39














          5












          5








          5







          If a Speaker hasn't resigned the position prior to a General Election, and is seeking to be re-elected as an MP, then the electorate will know. Convention even says that their "party" allegiance on the ballot paper should say "The Speaker seeking re-election".



          If there isn't a sitting Speaker seeking re-election as an MP then the electorate will not know as the decision is made at the start of each Parliament.



          The Parliamentary website covers this.



          Are some voters concerned by this? The answer is yes. I can't, however, find any case where these concerns materially affected a constituency election result though. In the linked case, for example, John Bercow was re-elected with a healthy majority.






          share|improve this answer















          If a Speaker hasn't resigned the position prior to a General Election, and is seeking to be re-elected as an MP, then the electorate will know. Convention even says that their "party" allegiance on the ballot paper should say "The Speaker seeking re-election".



          If there isn't a sitting Speaker seeking re-election as an MP then the electorate will not know as the decision is made at the start of each Parliament.



          The Parliamentary website covers this.



          Are some voters concerned by this? The answer is yes. I can't, however, find any case where these concerns materially affected a constituency election result though. In the linked case, for example, John Bercow was re-elected with a healthy majority.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Apr 4 at 9:59

























          answered Apr 3 at 18:59









          AlexAlex

          4,6801225




          4,6801225













          • There's a third option, which is probably more common than the one in the 2nd paragraph: if the sitting Speaker resigns in the middle of a parliament, and a new one is then elected. Obviously the new Speaker will have been a regular MP at the previous election (while the previous Speaker will have stood as the Speaker seeking re-election).

            – Steve Melnikoff
            Apr 3 at 22:10











          • The cases where "it materially affected a result" are exactly the cases in which the Speaker uses their casting vote. This most recently happened today.

            – Kevin
            Apr 4 at 2:39











          • @Kevin I meant that the voters’ concerns affected the election result. I’ Try to word that better.

            – Alex
            Apr 4 at 6:42






          • 1





            Yes, Bercow was re-elected with a healthy majority, but the fact that none of the major parties (Conservatives - though he was a Conservative before becoming the Speaker, Labour, and Lib Dems) stood candidates in that election meant there was no serious opposition either.

            – Christopher
            Apr 4 at 9:01











          • I can understand constituency voters being disgruntled. If the Speaker's re-election is practically guaranteed, then they are essentially being stripped of any meaningful choice. It seems quite undemocratic.

            – Time4Tea
            Apr 4 at 12:39



















          • There's a third option, which is probably more common than the one in the 2nd paragraph: if the sitting Speaker resigns in the middle of a parliament, and a new one is then elected. Obviously the new Speaker will have been a regular MP at the previous election (while the previous Speaker will have stood as the Speaker seeking re-election).

            – Steve Melnikoff
            Apr 3 at 22:10











          • The cases where "it materially affected a result" are exactly the cases in which the Speaker uses their casting vote. This most recently happened today.

            – Kevin
            Apr 4 at 2:39











          • @Kevin I meant that the voters’ concerns affected the election result. I’ Try to word that better.

            – Alex
            Apr 4 at 6:42






          • 1





            Yes, Bercow was re-elected with a healthy majority, but the fact that none of the major parties (Conservatives - though he was a Conservative before becoming the Speaker, Labour, and Lib Dems) stood candidates in that election meant there was no serious opposition either.

            – Christopher
            Apr 4 at 9:01











          • I can understand constituency voters being disgruntled. If the Speaker's re-election is practically guaranteed, then they are essentially being stripped of any meaningful choice. It seems quite undemocratic.

            – Time4Tea
            Apr 4 at 12:39

















          There's a third option, which is probably more common than the one in the 2nd paragraph: if the sitting Speaker resigns in the middle of a parliament, and a new one is then elected. Obviously the new Speaker will have been a regular MP at the previous election (while the previous Speaker will have stood as the Speaker seeking re-election).

          – Steve Melnikoff
          Apr 3 at 22:10





          There's a third option, which is probably more common than the one in the 2nd paragraph: if the sitting Speaker resigns in the middle of a parliament, and a new one is then elected. Obviously the new Speaker will have been a regular MP at the previous election (while the previous Speaker will have stood as the Speaker seeking re-election).

          – Steve Melnikoff
          Apr 3 at 22:10













          The cases where "it materially affected a result" are exactly the cases in which the Speaker uses their casting vote. This most recently happened today.

          – Kevin
          Apr 4 at 2:39





          The cases where "it materially affected a result" are exactly the cases in which the Speaker uses their casting vote. This most recently happened today.

          – Kevin
          Apr 4 at 2:39













          @Kevin I meant that the voters’ concerns affected the election result. I’ Try to word that better.

          – Alex
          Apr 4 at 6:42





          @Kevin I meant that the voters’ concerns affected the election result. I’ Try to word that better.

          – Alex
          Apr 4 at 6:42




          1




          1





          Yes, Bercow was re-elected with a healthy majority, but the fact that none of the major parties (Conservatives - though he was a Conservative before becoming the Speaker, Labour, and Lib Dems) stood candidates in that election meant there was no serious opposition either.

          – Christopher
          Apr 4 at 9:01





          Yes, Bercow was re-elected with a healthy majority, but the fact that none of the major parties (Conservatives - though he was a Conservative before becoming the Speaker, Labour, and Lib Dems) stood candidates in that election meant there was no serious opposition either.

          – Christopher
          Apr 4 at 9:01













          I can understand constituency voters being disgruntled. If the Speaker's re-election is practically guaranteed, then they are essentially being stripped of any meaningful choice. It seems quite undemocratic.

          – Time4Tea
          Apr 4 at 12:39





          I can understand constituency voters being disgruntled. If the Speaker's re-election is practically guaranteed, then they are essentially being stripped of any meaningful choice. It seems quite undemocratic.

          – Time4Tea
          Apr 4 at 12:39


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Politics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f40211%2fdo-uk-voters-know-if-their-mp-will-be-the-speaker-of-the-house%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          "Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

          Alcedinidae

          Origin of the phrase “under your belt”?