What are good platforms for collaborative writing with multiple senior authors with limited technical...












5















I am taking part in a project that involves several authors with so many back and forth in writing. I am curious to know what usually are digital platforms or role of thumbs in term of managing writing, edits, and comments by several authors who do not have a vast technical background and do not have time to learn new things such as GIT or LateX?



Do you prefer google documents for example or what?






writing collaboration







share|improve this question




















  • 1





    I am not sure if 'the best' tool can be given as an objective answer, maybe the question needs to be rephrased?

    – Jonas Schwarz
    2 days ago






  • 2





    Actually, you don't need the "best" platform. You need one that everyone finds useful.

    – Buffy
    2 days ago











  • @JonasSchwarz: It doesn't need to be objective, just supportable with evidence and/or experience (likely the latter, in this case). See Good Subjective, Bad Subjective. "What is the best platform" is definitely better wording than "What are good platforms", because the latter has no way to determine a single "best" answer for the OP to accept - it's simply an unending list, and no one answer will provide a complete answer to the question. (That's my opinion on the matter, at least.)

    – V2Blast
    2 days ago
















5















I am taking part in a project that involves several authors with so many back and forth in writing. I am curious to know what usually are digital platforms or role of thumbs in term of managing writing, edits, and comments by several authors who do not have a vast technical background and do not have time to learn new things such as GIT or LateX?



Do you prefer google documents for example or what?






writing collaboration







share|improve this question




















  • 1





    I am not sure if 'the best' tool can be given as an objective answer, maybe the question needs to be rephrased?

    – Jonas Schwarz
    2 days ago






  • 2





    Actually, you don't need the "best" platform. You need one that everyone finds useful.

    – Buffy
    2 days ago











  • @JonasSchwarz: It doesn't need to be objective, just supportable with evidence and/or experience (likely the latter, in this case). See Good Subjective, Bad Subjective. "What is the best platform" is definitely better wording than "What are good platforms", because the latter has no way to determine a single "best" answer for the OP to accept - it's simply an unending list, and no one answer will provide a complete answer to the question. (That's my opinion on the matter, at least.)

    – V2Blast
    2 days ago














5












5








5


1






I am taking part in a project that involves several authors with so many back and forth in writing. I am curious to know what usually are digital platforms or role of thumbs in term of managing writing, edits, and comments by several authors who do not have a vast technical background and do not have time to learn new things such as GIT or LateX?



Do you prefer google documents for example or what?






writing collaboration







share|improve this question
















I am taking part in a project that involves several authors with so many back and forth in writing. I am curious to know what usually are digital platforms or role of thumbs in term of managing writing, edits, and comments by several authors who do not have a vast technical background and do not have time to learn new things such as GIT or LateX?



Do you prefer google documents for example or what?






writing collaboration




writing collaboration






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 days ago







N00

















asked 2 days ago









N00N00

6071218




6071218








  • 1





    I am not sure if 'the best' tool can be given as an objective answer, maybe the question needs to be rephrased?

    – Jonas Schwarz
    2 days ago






  • 2





    Actually, you don't need the "best" platform. You need one that everyone finds useful.

    – Buffy
    2 days ago











  • @JonasSchwarz: It doesn't need to be objective, just supportable with evidence and/or experience (likely the latter, in this case). See Good Subjective, Bad Subjective. "What is the best platform" is definitely better wording than "What are good platforms", because the latter has no way to determine a single "best" answer for the OP to accept - it's simply an unending list, and no one answer will provide a complete answer to the question. (That's my opinion on the matter, at least.)

    – V2Blast
    2 days ago














  • 1





    I am not sure if 'the best' tool can be given as an objective answer, maybe the question needs to be rephrased?

    – Jonas Schwarz
    2 days ago






  • 2





    Actually, you don't need the "best" platform. You need one that everyone finds useful.

    – Buffy
    2 days ago











  • @JonasSchwarz: It doesn't need to be objective, just supportable with evidence and/or experience (likely the latter, in this case). See Good Subjective, Bad Subjective. "What is the best platform" is definitely better wording than "What are good platforms", because the latter has no way to determine a single "best" answer for the OP to accept - it's simply an unending list, and no one answer will provide a complete answer to the question. (That's my opinion on the matter, at least.)

    – V2Blast
    2 days ago








1




1





I am not sure if 'the best' tool can be given as an objective answer, maybe the question needs to be rephrased?

– Jonas Schwarz
2 days ago





I am not sure if 'the best' tool can be given as an objective answer, maybe the question needs to be rephrased?

– Jonas Schwarz
2 days ago




2




2





Actually, you don't need the "best" platform. You need one that everyone finds useful.

– Buffy
2 days ago





Actually, you don't need the "best" platform. You need one that everyone finds useful.

– Buffy
2 days ago













@JonasSchwarz: It doesn't need to be objective, just supportable with evidence and/or experience (likely the latter, in this case). See Good Subjective, Bad Subjective. "What is the best platform" is definitely better wording than "What are good platforms", because the latter has no way to determine a single "best" answer for the OP to accept - it's simply an unending list, and no one answer will provide a complete answer to the question. (That's my opinion on the matter, at least.)

– V2Blast
2 days ago





@JonasSchwarz: It doesn't need to be objective, just supportable with evidence and/or experience (likely the latter, in this case). See Good Subjective, Bad Subjective. "What is the best platform" is definitely better wording than "What are good platforms", because the latter has no way to determine a single "best" answer for the OP to accept - it's simply an unending list, and no one answer will provide a complete answer to the question. (That's my opinion on the matter, at least.)

– V2Blast
2 days ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















6














I use the following myself:



Non-technical: Google docs. Low threshold, can do basic stuff, cannot view history. Main drawback: No version control. (Also my university in principle does not allow it, but if you promise not to tell anybody...)



Technical, many collaborators: Overleaf. Can do full latex, not straightforward to go to commit history, but can be done since it is git based. I am not too fond of their interface, find it a bit clunky, but many of my collaborators really like it, so I use it anyway.



Technical, few collaborators: latex documents on private gitlab instance. This is for me the best. Commit history easily accessible, anything you want to do, can be done. Gitlab even has a builtin IDE, so you can do small edits directly in the browser. Drawback: high threshold.



This, for me, covers all use cases.






share|improve this answer



















  • 1





    You can view history on Google docs. Office 365 now has a similar feature (online collaborative), so that's another option and most universities have one of the two (we actually have both, so we're at least AOK using Docs).

    – guifa
    2 days ago






  • 1





    Google Docs does have some form of version control. You can view edit history, see who made what change when, and save named versions, and can revert to any recorded change if needed.

    – GoodDeeds
    2 days ago






  • 1





    Thanks, then I also learned something today :-).

    – nabla
    yesterday



















5














If you are in a hurry, you might want to try an online TeX editor such as Overleaf.



Another solution if you are using TeX would be to work alongside a version control system, e.g. git. Keep in mind that it takes some time to get used to it, though.



I do not know about non-TeX-solutions but i feel that a plain-text format has a couple of advantages for this kind of application.



I am looking forward to read other responses to learn about other options.






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "415"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f123007%2fwhat-are-good-platforms-for-collaborative-writing-with-multiple-senior-authors-w%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    6














    I use the following myself:



    Non-technical: Google docs. Low threshold, can do basic stuff, cannot view history. Main drawback: No version control. (Also my university in principle does not allow it, but if you promise not to tell anybody...)



    Technical, many collaborators: Overleaf. Can do full latex, not straightforward to go to commit history, but can be done since it is git based. I am not too fond of their interface, find it a bit clunky, but many of my collaborators really like it, so I use it anyway.



    Technical, few collaborators: latex documents on private gitlab instance. This is for me the best. Commit history easily accessible, anything you want to do, can be done. Gitlab even has a builtin IDE, so you can do small edits directly in the browser. Drawback: high threshold.



    This, for me, covers all use cases.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 1





      You can view history on Google docs. Office 365 now has a similar feature (online collaborative), so that's another option and most universities have one of the two (we actually have both, so we're at least AOK using Docs).

      – guifa
      2 days ago






    • 1





      Google Docs does have some form of version control. You can view edit history, see who made what change when, and save named versions, and can revert to any recorded change if needed.

      – GoodDeeds
      2 days ago






    • 1





      Thanks, then I also learned something today :-).

      – nabla
      yesterday
















    6














    I use the following myself:



    Non-technical: Google docs. Low threshold, can do basic stuff, cannot view history. Main drawback: No version control. (Also my university in principle does not allow it, but if you promise not to tell anybody...)



    Technical, many collaborators: Overleaf. Can do full latex, not straightforward to go to commit history, but can be done since it is git based. I am not too fond of their interface, find it a bit clunky, but many of my collaborators really like it, so I use it anyway.



    Technical, few collaborators: latex documents on private gitlab instance. This is for me the best. Commit history easily accessible, anything you want to do, can be done. Gitlab even has a builtin IDE, so you can do small edits directly in the browser. Drawback: high threshold.



    This, for me, covers all use cases.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 1





      You can view history on Google docs. Office 365 now has a similar feature (online collaborative), so that's another option and most universities have one of the two (we actually have both, so we're at least AOK using Docs).

      – guifa
      2 days ago






    • 1





      Google Docs does have some form of version control. You can view edit history, see who made what change when, and save named versions, and can revert to any recorded change if needed.

      – GoodDeeds
      2 days ago






    • 1





      Thanks, then I also learned something today :-).

      – nabla
      yesterday














    6












    6








    6







    I use the following myself:



    Non-technical: Google docs. Low threshold, can do basic stuff, cannot view history. Main drawback: No version control. (Also my university in principle does not allow it, but if you promise not to tell anybody...)



    Technical, many collaborators: Overleaf. Can do full latex, not straightforward to go to commit history, but can be done since it is git based. I am not too fond of their interface, find it a bit clunky, but many of my collaborators really like it, so I use it anyway.



    Technical, few collaborators: latex documents on private gitlab instance. This is for me the best. Commit history easily accessible, anything you want to do, can be done. Gitlab even has a builtin IDE, so you can do small edits directly in the browser. Drawback: high threshold.



    This, for me, covers all use cases.






    share|improve this answer













    I use the following myself:



    Non-technical: Google docs. Low threshold, can do basic stuff, cannot view history. Main drawback: No version control. (Also my university in principle does not allow it, but if you promise not to tell anybody...)



    Technical, many collaborators: Overleaf. Can do full latex, not straightforward to go to commit history, but can be done since it is git based. I am not too fond of their interface, find it a bit clunky, but many of my collaborators really like it, so I use it anyway.



    Technical, few collaborators: latex documents on private gitlab instance. This is for me the best. Commit history easily accessible, anything you want to do, can be done. Gitlab even has a builtin IDE, so you can do small edits directly in the browser. Drawback: high threshold.



    This, for me, covers all use cases.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 2 days ago









    nablanabla

    5,60221431




    5,60221431








    • 1





      You can view history on Google docs. Office 365 now has a similar feature (online collaborative), so that's another option and most universities have one of the two (we actually have both, so we're at least AOK using Docs).

      – guifa
      2 days ago






    • 1





      Google Docs does have some form of version control. You can view edit history, see who made what change when, and save named versions, and can revert to any recorded change if needed.

      – GoodDeeds
      2 days ago






    • 1





      Thanks, then I also learned something today :-).

      – nabla
      yesterday














    • 1





      You can view history on Google docs. Office 365 now has a similar feature (online collaborative), so that's another option and most universities have one of the two (we actually have both, so we're at least AOK using Docs).

      – guifa
      2 days ago






    • 1





      Google Docs does have some form of version control. You can view edit history, see who made what change when, and save named versions, and can revert to any recorded change if needed.

      – GoodDeeds
      2 days ago






    • 1





      Thanks, then I also learned something today :-).

      – nabla
      yesterday








    1




    1





    You can view history on Google docs. Office 365 now has a similar feature (online collaborative), so that's another option and most universities have one of the two (we actually have both, so we're at least AOK using Docs).

    – guifa
    2 days ago





    You can view history on Google docs. Office 365 now has a similar feature (online collaborative), so that's another option and most universities have one of the two (we actually have both, so we're at least AOK using Docs).

    – guifa
    2 days ago




    1




    1





    Google Docs does have some form of version control. You can view edit history, see who made what change when, and save named versions, and can revert to any recorded change if needed.

    – GoodDeeds
    2 days ago





    Google Docs does have some form of version control. You can view edit history, see who made what change when, and save named versions, and can revert to any recorded change if needed.

    – GoodDeeds
    2 days ago




    1




    1





    Thanks, then I also learned something today :-).

    – nabla
    yesterday





    Thanks, then I also learned something today :-).

    – nabla
    yesterday











    5














    If you are in a hurry, you might want to try an online TeX editor such as Overleaf.



    Another solution if you are using TeX would be to work alongside a version control system, e.g. git. Keep in mind that it takes some time to get used to it, though.



    I do not know about non-TeX-solutions but i feel that a plain-text format has a couple of advantages for this kind of application.



    I am looking forward to read other responses to learn about other options.






    share|improve this answer




























      5














      If you are in a hurry, you might want to try an online TeX editor such as Overleaf.



      Another solution if you are using TeX would be to work alongside a version control system, e.g. git. Keep in mind that it takes some time to get used to it, though.



      I do not know about non-TeX-solutions but i feel that a plain-text format has a couple of advantages for this kind of application.



      I am looking forward to read other responses to learn about other options.






      share|improve this answer


























        5












        5








        5







        If you are in a hurry, you might want to try an online TeX editor such as Overleaf.



        Another solution if you are using TeX would be to work alongside a version control system, e.g. git. Keep in mind that it takes some time to get used to it, though.



        I do not know about non-TeX-solutions but i feel that a plain-text format has a couple of advantages for this kind of application.



        I am looking forward to read other responses to learn about other options.






        share|improve this answer













        If you are in a hurry, you might want to try an online TeX editor such as Overleaf.



        Another solution if you are using TeX would be to work alongside a version control system, e.g. git. Keep in mind that it takes some time to get used to it, though.



        I do not know about non-TeX-solutions but i feel that a plain-text format has a couple of advantages for this kind of application.



        I am looking forward to read other responses to learn about other options.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 2 days ago









        Jonas SchwarzJonas Schwarz

        1,0441621




        1,0441621






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Academia Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f123007%2fwhat-are-good-platforms-for-collaborative-writing-with-multiple-senior-authors-w%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            "Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

            Image
            .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box; } 2 total noob sorry any help greatly appreciated. I keep getting this "Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'." heres my codes code one CREATE TABLE supplier ( supplierID INT PRIMARY KEY, ISBN INT FOREIGN KEY REFERENCES book(ISBN), price DECIMAL (5,2), ON UPDATE CASCADE, ON DELETE CASCADE, ); code two CREATE TABLE orders ( orderID INT PRIMARY KEY, customerID INT FOREIGN KEY REFERENCES customer(customerID), ISBN INT FOREIGN KEY REFERENCES book(ISBN), orderDate date, ON UPDATE CASCADE, ON DELETE CASCADE, ); Ive run out of stuff to try other than dumbing it down to uselessness.
            Read more

            Alcedinidae

            Image
            Alcedinidae Martin-pêcheur à dos bleu ( Alcedo azurea ) Classification (COI) Règne Animalia Embranchement Chordata Sous-embr. Vertebrata Classe Aves Ordre Coraciiformes Famille Alcedinidae Rafinesque, 1815 Les Alcédinidés ou Alcedinidae forment une famille d'oiseaux plus connus sous les noms de martins-pêcheurs et martins-chasseurs. Sommaire 1 Description 2 Répartition et habitat 3 Systématique 3.1 Liste alphabétique des genres 3.2 Liste des espèces 4 Chez les Anciens : l'alcyon 4.1 Étymologie (Littré) 4.2 Oiseau « fabuleux » ? 5 Notes 6 Articles connexes 7 Liens externes 7.1 Bibliographie Description | Ce sont des oiseaux compacts de taille petite à moyenne (10 à 46 cm), au bec droit et long, en forme de poignard. Leurs pattes sont courtes, et ils portent un plumage aux couleurs vives. Répartition et habitat | Cosmopolites, ils fréquentent surtout
            Read more

            RAC Tourist Trophy

            Image
            Pour les articles homonymes, voir Tourist Trophy. Le RAC Tourist Trophy est une course automobile organisée par le Royal Automobile Club d'Angleterre. Créée en 1905, cette course a fait partie des épreuves comptant pour le championnat du monde des voitures de sport entre 1953 et 1955, en 1958 et 1959, et entre 1962 et 1965. Après une interruption de 17 ans (l'épreuve s'arrête après 1988), le RAC Tourist Trophy reprend en 2005 sous l'égide de la FIA GT. Palmarès | John Napier sur Arrol-Johnston, vainqueur du premier RAC Tourist Trophy, en 1905. L'honorable C.S. Rolls, vainqueur du RAC Tourist Trophy 1906. Ernest Curtis, sur Rover 20 hp, vainqueur du RAC Tourist Trophy 1907. William Watson, vainqueur du RAC Tourist Trophy 1908. Kenelm Lee Guinness, vainqueur du RAC Tourist Trophy 1914 sur Sunbeam. Départ du RAC Tourist Trophy 1928. Louis Gérard, vainqueur du RAC Tourist Trophy 1938 sur Delage. Année Circuit Vainqueur
            Read more