Change data context of template property











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I have a data template property on a control which I would like to wrap to change the behavior a bit.



That template property should be exposed to the user(developer) of my control but I want to change the data context, because the data context I would like to pass the user is somewhere within the visual tree and I don't want the user to navigate there every time. So in the end the binding path is just a bit simplyfied for the user (developer) of the BaseControl



XAML in control wrapper



<BaseControl SomeTemplate="{Binding MyTemplate}" />


Code behind in control wrapper



public static readonly DependencyProperty MyTemplateProperty = DependencyProperty.Register(
"MyTemplate", typeof(DataTemplate), typeof(BaseControl), new PropertyMetadata(default(DataTemplate)));

public DataTemplate MyTemplate { get { return (DataTemplate)GetValue(MyTemplateProperty ); } set { SetValue(MyTemplateProperty , value); } }


Usage of control wrapper



<BaseControl>
<BaseControl.MyTemplateProperty>
<!-- desired -->
<Label Content="{Binding Name}" />
<!-- actual -->
<!-- the data context of "OtherProperty" should be exposed to the user -->
<Label Content="{Binding DataContext.SomeProperty.OtherProperty.Name, RelativeSource={RelativeSource Mode=FindAncestor, AncestorType=SomeType}}" />
</BaseControl.MyTemplateProperty>
</BaseControl>









share|improve this question
























  • You change the DataContext of a control by setting the DataContext property of it. Your issue is unclear.
    – mm8
    Nov 19 at 12:54










  • I have some complex binding path within my control wrapper and I want that path to be simplyfied for the user of that wrapper template
    – DerApe
    Nov 20 at 8:23












  • By "user" I guess you mean the developer. That's now how it works. A control inherits a DataContext and if you want some other DataContext, you will have to set it. This is what you would expect as a WPF and XAML developer. Trying to "simplify" or modify fundamental things such as this only makes your control more complex and harder to use.
    – mm8
    Nov 20 at 10:38















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I have a data template property on a control which I would like to wrap to change the behavior a bit.



That template property should be exposed to the user(developer) of my control but I want to change the data context, because the data context I would like to pass the user is somewhere within the visual tree and I don't want the user to navigate there every time. So in the end the binding path is just a bit simplyfied for the user (developer) of the BaseControl



XAML in control wrapper



<BaseControl SomeTemplate="{Binding MyTemplate}" />


Code behind in control wrapper



public static readonly DependencyProperty MyTemplateProperty = DependencyProperty.Register(
"MyTemplate", typeof(DataTemplate), typeof(BaseControl), new PropertyMetadata(default(DataTemplate)));

public DataTemplate MyTemplate { get { return (DataTemplate)GetValue(MyTemplateProperty ); } set { SetValue(MyTemplateProperty , value); } }


Usage of control wrapper



<BaseControl>
<BaseControl.MyTemplateProperty>
<!-- desired -->
<Label Content="{Binding Name}" />
<!-- actual -->
<!-- the data context of "OtherProperty" should be exposed to the user -->
<Label Content="{Binding DataContext.SomeProperty.OtherProperty.Name, RelativeSource={RelativeSource Mode=FindAncestor, AncestorType=SomeType}}" />
</BaseControl.MyTemplateProperty>
</BaseControl>









share|improve this question
























  • You change the DataContext of a control by setting the DataContext property of it. Your issue is unclear.
    – mm8
    Nov 19 at 12:54










  • I have some complex binding path within my control wrapper and I want that path to be simplyfied for the user of that wrapper template
    – DerApe
    Nov 20 at 8:23












  • By "user" I guess you mean the developer. That's now how it works. A control inherits a DataContext and if you want some other DataContext, you will have to set it. This is what you would expect as a WPF and XAML developer. Trying to "simplify" or modify fundamental things such as this only makes your control more complex and harder to use.
    – mm8
    Nov 20 at 10:38













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I have a data template property on a control which I would like to wrap to change the behavior a bit.



That template property should be exposed to the user(developer) of my control but I want to change the data context, because the data context I would like to pass the user is somewhere within the visual tree and I don't want the user to navigate there every time. So in the end the binding path is just a bit simplyfied for the user (developer) of the BaseControl



XAML in control wrapper



<BaseControl SomeTemplate="{Binding MyTemplate}" />


Code behind in control wrapper



public static readonly DependencyProperty MyTemplateProperty = DependencyProperty.Register(
"MyTemplate", typeof(DataTemplate), typeof(BaseControl), new PropertyMetadata(default(DataTemplate)));

public DataTemplate MyTemplate { get { return (DataTemplate)GetValue(MyTemplateProperty ); } set { SetValue(MyTemplateProperty , value); } }


Usage of control wrapper



<BaseControl>
<BaseControl.MyTemplateProperty>
<!-- desired -->
<Label Content="{Binding Name}" />
<!-- actual -->
<!-- the data context of "OtherProperty" should be exposed to the user -->
<Label Content="{Binding DataContext.SomeProperty.OtherProperty.Name, RelativeSource={RelativeSource Mode=FindAncestor, AncestorType=SomeType}}" />
</BaseControl.MyTemplateProperty>
</BaseControl>









share|improve this question















I have a data template property on a control which I would like to wrap to change the behavior a bit.



That template property should be exposed to the user(developer) of my control but I want to change the data context, because the data context I would like to pass the user is somewhere within the visual tree and I don't want the user to navigate there every time. So in the end the binding path is just a bit simplyfied for the user (developer) of the BaseControl



XAML in control wrapper



<BaseControl SomeTemplate="{Binding MyTemplate}" />


Code behind in control wrapper



public static readonly DependencyProperty MyTemplateProperty = DependencyProperty.Register(
"MyTemplate", typeof(DataTemplate), typeof(BaseControl), new PropertyMetadata(default(DataTemplate)));

public DataTemplate MyTemplate { get { return (DataTemplate)GetValue(MyTemplateProperty ); } set { SetValue(MyTemplateProperty , value); } }


Usage of control wrapper



<BaseControl>
<BaseControl.MyTemplateProperty>
<!-- desired -->
<Label Content="{Binding Name}" />
<!-- actual -->
<!-- the data context of "OtherProperty" should be exposed to the user -->
<Label Content="{Binding DataContext.SomeProperty.OtherProperty.Name, RelativeSource={RelativeSource Mode=FindAncestor, AncestorType=SomeType}}" />
</BaseControl.MyTemplateProperty>
</BaseControl>






c# wpf datatemplate dependency-properties






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 20 at 11:05

























asked Nov 19 at 6:47









DerApe

2,27722643




2,27722643












  • You change the DataContext of a control by setting the DataContext property of it. Your issue is unclear.
    – mm8
    Nov 19 at 12:54










  • I have some complex binding path within my control wrapper and I want that path to be simplyfied for the user of that wrapper template
    – DerApe
    Nov 20 at 8:23












  • By "user" I guess you mean the developer. That's now how it works. A control inherits a DataContext and if you want some other DataContext, you will have to set it. This is what you would expect as a WPF and XAML developer. Trying to "simplify" or modify fundamental things such as this only makes your control more complex and harder to use.
    – mm8
    Nov 20 at 10:38


















  • You change the DataContext of a control by setting the DataContext property of it. Your issue is unclear.
    – mm8
    Nov 19 at 12:54










  • I have some complex binding path within my control wrapper and I want that path to be simplyfied for the user of that wrapper template
    – DerApe
    Nov 20 at 8:23












  • By "user" I guess you mean the developer. That's now how it works. A control inherits a DataContext and if you want some other DataContext, you will have to set it. This is what you would expect as a WPF and XAML developer. Trying to "simplify" or modify fundamental things such as this only makes your control more complex and harder to use.
    – mm8
    Nov 20 at 10:38
















You change the DataContext of a control by setting the DataContext property of it. Your issue is unclear.
– mm8
Nov 19 at 12:54




You change the DataContext of a control by setting the DataContext property of it. Your issue is unclear.
– mm8
Nov 19 at 12:54












I have some complex binding path within my control wrapper and I want that path to be simplyfied for the user of that wrapper template
– DerApe
Nov 20 at 8:23






I have some complex binding path within my control wrapper and I want that path to be simplyfied for the user of that wrapper template
– DerApe
Nov 20 at 8:23














By "user" I guess you mean the developer. That's now how it works. A control inherits a DataContext and if you want some other DataContext, you will have to set it. This is what you would expect as a WPF and XAML developer. Trying to "simplify" or modify fundamental things such as this only makes your control more complex and harder to use.
– mm8
Nov 20 at 10:38




By "user" I guess you mean the developer. That's now how it works. A control inherits a DataContext and if you want some other DataContext, you will have to set it. This is what you would expect as a WPF and XAML developer. Trying to "simplify" or modify fundamental things such as this only makes your control more complex and harder to use.
– mm8
Nov 20 at 10:38

















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53369583%2fchange-data-context-of-template-property%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53369583%2fchange-data-context-of-template-property%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

Alcedinidae

Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]