An adjective for “genocide” when we want to say it is a really big one?












-3
















How such ---- genocide was made possible?




So, I guess simply saying "big genocide" does not convey the meaning I intend it to. I need an adjective which is more strong that "big". I was thinking about "tremendous", but it seems to have some positive connotation, like when used in "tremendous sum of money". What is a good adjective for genocide when we want to say it is really big, one that is idiomatic?



I know every genocide is big, even bigger than big. But that does not mean we cannot use any adjective before it, does it? A genocide that kills 10000000 people is bigger than one that kills 1000 people. Right? So what should I say when I want to talk about a genocide killing 10000000 people?










share|improve this question




















  • 4





    By definition genocide is big—it's the extermination of an entire people, and it's hard to get bigger than "everyone". I suspect either you're talking about the size of the population being murdered, or the degree of success of an attempted genocide—can you clarify?

    – 1006a
    yesterday






  • 2





    The word genocide indicates a program or situation that has met or surpassed an extreme threshold. Every genocide is a major genocide; there are no minor ones. Every genocide is a significant genocide; there are no paltry ones. Please edit your post to provide an example of what you are trying to describe.

    – choster
    yesterday






  • 2





    Wow, you need something bigger than genocide? That word was only coined is the WW2 era, I'm assuming because the writer thought they needed a word to mean a really really big mass killing of people. Before then, according to Wikipedia, terms such as "massacre", "crimes against humanity", and "extermination" were used.

    – Zebrafish
    yesterday






  • 1





    in what way is is big? Is it widespread genocide, is it longlasting genocide...

    – Jim
    yesterday






  • 2





    @Jooya I am trying to advise you that genocide is a loaded term. Not every mass killing is a genocide. Do not compare one genocide to another; instead, compare aspects of them. You can say one genocide has a higher death toll than another, that a higher percentage of a population died in one or another. To say one is larger or bloodier or worse than another is to invite offense.

    – choster
    yesterday
















-3
















How such ---- genocide was made possible?




So, I guess simply saying "big genocide" does not convey the meaning I intend it to. I need an adjective which is more strong that "big". I was thinking about "tremendous", but it seems to have some positive connotation, like when used in "tremendous sum of money". What is a good adjective for genocide when we want to say it is really big, one that is idiomatic?



I know every genocide is big, even bigger than big. But that does not mean we cannot use any adjective before it, does it? A genocide that kills 10000000 people is bigger than one that kills 1000 people. Right? So what should I say when I want to talk about a genocide killing 10000000 people?










share|improve this question




















  • 4





    By definition genocide is big—it's the extermination of an entire people, and it's hard to get bigger than "everyone". I suspect either you're talking about the size of the population being murdered, or the degree of success of an attempted genocide—can you clarify?

    – 1006a
    yesterday






  • 2





    The word genocide indicates a program or situation that has met or surpassed an extreme threshold. Every genocide is a major genocide; there are no minor ones. Every genocide is a significant genocide; there are no paltry ones. Please edit your post to provide an example of what you are trying to describe.

    – choster
    yesterday






  • 2





    Wow, you need something bigger than genocide? That word was only coined is the WW2 era, I'm assuming because the writer thought they needed a word to mean a really really big mass killing of people. Before then, according to Wikipedia, terms such as "massacre", "crimes against humanity", and "extermination" were used.

    – Zebrafish
    yesterday






  • 1





    in what way is is big? Is it widespread genocide, is it longlasting genocide...

    – Jim
    yesterday






  • 2





    @Jooya I am trying to advise you that genocide is a loaded term. Not every mass killing is a genocide. Do not compare one genocide to another; instead, compare aspects of them. You can say one genocide has a higher death toll than another, that a higher percentage of a population died in one or another. To say one is larger or bloodier or worse than another is to invite offense.

    – choster
    yesterday














-3












-3








-3


1







How such ---- genocide was made possible?




So, I guess simply saying "big genocide" does not convey the meaning I intend it to. I need an adjective which is more strong that "big". I was thinking about "tremendous", but it seems to have some positive connotation, like when used in "tremendous sum of money". What is a good adjective for genocide when we want to say it is really big, one that is idiomatic?



I know every genocide is big, even bigger than big. But that does not mean we cannot use any adjective before it, does it? A genocide that kills 10000000 people is bigger than one that kills 1000 people. Right? So what should I say when I want to talk about a genocide killing 10000000 people?










share|improve this question

















How such ---- genocide was made possible?




So, I guess simply saying "big genocide" does not convey the meaning I intend it to. I need an adjective which is more strong that "big". I was thinking about "tremendous", but it seems to have some positive connotation, like when used in "tremendous sum of money". What is a good adjective for genocide when we want to say it is really big, one that is idiomatic?



I know every genocide is big, even bigger than big. But that does not mean we cannot use any adjective before it, does it? A genocide that kills 10000000 people is bigger than one that kills 1000 people. Right? So what should I say when I want to talk about a genocide killing 10000000 people?







single-word-requests idioms






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday







Jooya

















asked yesterday









JooyaJooya

7961238




7961238








  • 4





    By definition genocide is big—it's the extermination of an entire people, and it's hard to get bigger than "everyone". I suspect either you're talking about the size of the population being murdered, or the degree of success of an attempted genocide—can you clarify?

    – 1006a
    yesterday






  • 2





    The word genocide indicates a program or situation that has met or surpassed an extreme threshold. Every genocide is a major genocide; there are no minor ones. Every genocide is a significant genocide; there are no paltry ones. Please edit your post to provide an example of what you are trying to describe.

    – choster
    yesterday






  • 2





    Wow, you need something bigger than genocide? That word was only coined is the WW2 era, I'm assuming because the writer thought they needed a word to mean a really really big mass killing of people. Before then, according to Wikipedia, terms such as "massacre", "crimes against humanity", and "extermination" were used.

    – Zebrafish
    yesterday






  • 1





    in what way is is big? Is it widespread genocide, is it longlasting genocide...

    – Jim
    yesterday






  • 2





    @Jooya I am trying to advise you that genocide is a loaded term. Not every mass killing is a genocide. Do not compare one genocide to another; instead, compare aspects of them. You can say one genocide has a higher death toll than another, that a higher percentage of a population died in one or another. To say one is larger or bloodier or worse than another is to invite offense.

    – choster
    yesterday














  • 4





    By definition genocide is big—it's the extermination of an entire people, and it's hard to get bigger than "everyone". I suspect either you're talking about the size of the population being murdered, or the degree of success of an attempted genocide—can you clarify?

    – 1006a
    yesterday






  • 2





    The word genocide indicates a program or situation that has met or surpassed an extreme threshold. Every genocide is a major genocide; there are no minor ones. Every genocide is a significant genocide; there are no paltry ones. Please edit your post to provide an example of what you are trying to describe.

    – choster
    yesterday






  • 2





    Wow, you need something bigger than genocide? That word was only coined is the WW2 era, I'm assuming because the writer thought they needed a word to mean a really really big mass killing of people. Before then, according to Wikipedia, terms such as "massacre", "crimes against humanity", and "extermination" were used.

    – Zebrafish
    yesterday






  • 1





    in what way is is big? Is it widespread genocide, is it longlasting genocide...

    – Jim
    yesterday






  • 2





    @Jooya I am trying to advise you that genocide is a loaded term. Not every mass killing is a genocide. Do not compare one genocide to another; instead, compare aspects of them. You can say one genocide has a higher death toll than another, that a higher percentage of a population died in one or another. To say one is larger or bloodier or worse than another is to invite offense.

    – choster
    yesterday








4




4





By definition genocide is big—it's the extermination of an entire people, and it's hard to get bigger than "everyone". I suspect either you're talking about the size of the population being murdered, or the degree of success of an attempted genocide—can you clarify?

– 1006a
yesterday





By definition genocide is big—it's the extermination of an entire people, and it's hard to get bigger than "everyone". I suspect either you're talking about the size of the population being murdered, or the degree of success of an attempted genocide—can you clarify?

– 1006a
yesterday




2




2





The word genocide indicates a program or situation that has met or surpassed an extreme threshold. Every genocide is a major genocide; there are no minor ones. Every genocide is a significant genocide; there are no paltry ones. Please edit your post to provide an example of what you are trying to describe.

– choster
yesterday





The word genocide indicates a program or situation that has met or surpassed an extreme threshold. Every genocide is a major genocide; there are no minor ones. Every genocide is a significant genocide; there are no paltry ones. Please edit your post to provide an example of what you are trying to describe.

– choster
yesterday




2




2





Wow, you need something bigger than genocide? That word was only coined is the WW2 era, I'm assuming because the writer thought they needed a word to mean a really really big mass killing of people. Before then, according to Wikipedia, terms such as "massacre", "crimes against humanity", and "extermination" were used.

– Zebrafish
yesterday





Wow, you need something bigger than genocide? That word was only coined is the WW2 era, I'm assuming because the writer thought they needed a word to mean a really really big mass killing of people. Before then, according to Wikipedia, terms such as "massacre", "crimes against humanity", and "extermination" were used.

– Zebrafish
yesterday




1




1





in what way is is big? Is it widespread genocide, is it longlasting genocide...

– Jim
yesterday





in what way is is big? Is it widespread genocide, is it longlasting genocide...

– Jim
yesterday




2




2





@Jooya I am trying to advise you that genocide is a loaded term. Not every mass killing is a genocide. Do not compare one genocide to another; instead, compare aspects of them. You can say one genocide has a higher death toll than another, that a higher percentage of a population died in one or another. To say one is larger or bloodier or worse than another is to invite offense.

– choster
yesterday





@Jooya I am trying to advise you that genocide is a loaded term. Not every mass killing is a genocide. Do not compare one genocide to another; instead, compare aspects of them. You can say one genocide has a higher death toll than another, that a higher percentage of a population died in one or another. To say one is larger or bloodier or worse than another is to invite offense.

– choster
yesterday










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f484161%2fan-adjective-for-genocide-when-we-want-to-say-it-is-a-really-big-one%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f484161%2fan-adjective-for-genocide-when-we-want-to-say-it-is-a-really-big-one%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

Alcedinidae

Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]