Plausibility of Mushroom Buildings
$begingroup$
How plausible would buildings made inside of, or made using, giant mushrooms be?
Copyright Raphael Lacoste 2018
A staple of the fatasy genre, mushrooms have commonly been seen as magical and unusual. Often we see houses and structures made inside of these mushrooms by magical or nature-loving individuals, but how possible would this be?
If we assume that they could grow (either through magical or natural means) could you make a house inside of, or using, the giant mushrooms? To qualify as a house, it needs to be someone’s permanent place of residence and contain at least one room.
reality-check magic environment flora architecture
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
How plausible would buildings made inside of, or made using, giant mushrooms be?
Copyright Raphael Lacoste 2018
A staple of the fatasy genre, mushrooms have commonly been seen as magical and unusual. Often we see houses and structures made inside of these mushrooms by magical or nature-loving individuals, but how possible would this be?
If we assume that they could grow (either through magical or natural means) could you make a house inside of, or using, the giant mushrooms? To qualify as a house, it needs to be someone’s permanent place of residence and contain at least one room.
reality-check magic environment flora architecture
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Welcome to Worldbuilding.SE! We're glad you could join us! When you have a moment, please click here to learn more about our culture and take our tour. The SE model is one-specific-question/one-best-answer. You've asked multiple questions, which will likely get the question closed as too broad. Can you narrow this down to one, specific question? (You can always ask more questions.)
$endgroup$
– JBH
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@JBH Thank you. I have edited out the second, less important question. I thought that the two would have been closely-related enough as to not appear too broad but better safe than sorry.
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
How plausible would buildings made inside of, or made using, giant mushrooms be?
Copyright Raphael Lacoste 2018
A staple of the fatasy genre, mushrooms have commonly been seen as magical and unusual. Often we see houses and structures made inside of these mushrooms by magical or nature-loving individuals, but how possible would this be?
If we assume that they could grow (either through magical or natural means) could you make a house inside of, or using, the giant mushrooms? To qualify as a house, it needs to be someone’s permanent place of residence and contain at least one room.
reality-check magic environment flora architecture
New contributor
$endgroup$
How plausible would buildings made inside of, or made using, giant mushrooms be?
Copyright Raphael Lacoste 2018
A staple of the fatasy genre, mushrooms have commonly been seen as magical and unusual. Often we see houses and structures made inside of these mushrooms by magical or nature-loving individuals, but how possible would this be?
If we assume that they could grow (either through magical or natural means) could you make a house inside of, or using, the giant mushrooms? To qualify as a house, it needs to be someone’s permanent place of residence and contain at least one room.
reality-check magic environment flora architecture
reality-check magic environment flora architecture
New contributor
New contributor
edited 4 hours ago
chasly from UK
17.6k776160
17.6k776160
New contributor
asked 7 hours ago
Liam MorrisLiam Morris
566
566
New contributor
New contributor
$begingroup$
Welcome to Worldbuilding.SE! We're glad you could join us! When you have a moment, please click here to learn more about our culture and take our tour. The SE model is one-specific-question/one-best-answer. You've asked multiple questions, which will likely get the question closed as too broad. Can you narrow this down to one, specific question? (You can always ask more questions.)
$endgroup$
– JBH
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@JBH Thank you. I have edited out the second, less important question. I thought that the two would have been closely-related enough as to not appear too broad but better safe than sorry.
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Welcome to Worldbuilding.SE! We're glad you could join us! When you have a moment, please click here to learn more about our culture and take our tour. The SE model is one-specific-question/one-best-answer. You've asked multiple questions, which will likely get the question closed as too broad. Can you narrow this down to one, specific question? (You can always ask more questions.)
$endgroup$
– JBH
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@JBH Thank you. I have edited out the second, less important question. I thought that the two would have been closely-related enough as to not appear too broad but better safe than sorry.
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Welcome to Worldbuilding.SE! We're glad you could join us! When you have a moment, please click here to learn more about our culture and take our tour. The SE model is one-specific-question/one-best-answer. You've asked multiple questions, which will likely get the question closed as too broad. Can you narrow this down to one, specific question? (You can always ask more questions.)
$endgroup$
– JBH
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Welcome to Worldbuilding.SE! We're glad you could join us! When you have a moment, please click here to learn more about our culture and take our tour. The SE model is one-specific-question/one-best-answer. You've asked multiple questions, which will likely get the question closed as too broad. Can you narrow this down to one, specific question? (You can always ask more questions.)
$endgroup$
– JBH
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@JBH Thank you. I have edited out the second, less important question. I thought that the two would have been closely-related enough as to not appear too broad but better safe than sorry.
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@JBH Thank you. I have edited out the second, less important question. I thought that the two would have been closely-related enough as to not appear too broad but better safe than sorry.
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
6 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Prototaxites!
Fossil mushrooms are rarities. Mushrooms are the fungal equivalent of flowers - spongy, ephemeral, disposable bodies generated to serve a reproductive need. You could not use mushrooms for wood.
The prototaxites were not mushrooms. They were large and substantial; up to 7 meters high.
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/long-before-trees-overtook-the-land-earth-was-covered-by-giant-mushrooms-13709647/
They were not temporary structures like mushrooms, but perennial like trees. I deduce this from the presence of growth rings in the fossil prototaxites.
https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Transversely-sectioned-Prototaxites-fossil-This-overview-image-originating-from-a_fig1_51174561
The presence of rings means this structure endured shifts in growing conditions over time. This thing was there for many seasons. On earth, that means it weathered storms and wind: no small feat for an upright thing this size.
There is an analogous modern fungus: the bracket fungus aka "shelf fungus".
The shelf is also a spore-making body but a permanent one, and it also can persist many seasons, laying down growth rings with the seasons. Bracket fungi are as tough as wood.
https://herbarium.usu.edu/fun-with-fungi/shelf-fungi
Woody shelves may be several years old. They add a new layer of spore
tissue every growing season. The old layer is covered by the new one.
These layers look like growth rings in a tree. One author reported
counting 37 rings. Ten layers may mean the shelf is 10 years-old if
there is only one growing season (spring). If there are two growing
seasons per year (spring and fall), it may only be 5 years-old.
One of the largest shelves weighs 300 pounds…
Woody shelves are impossible to break with your hands and difficult to
cut. This toughness results from the kinds of hyphae (filaments) that
are used to construct the shelf. Easily crushed mushrooms are made of
thin-walled hyphae. Some of the hyphae in woody shelves are
thick-walled and the hyphae are interwoven making them tougher. They
resist tearing or splitting because there are no planes to split along
in the tissue.
A bracket fungus large enough could be used for wood. The medium to small ones are used to make real shelves and durable beads.
It is reasonable to assume the prototaxites were of a composition similar to modern bracket fungi and so suitable for use as a wood equivalent. A redwood-sized Prototaxite could be hollowed out and used as a dwelling.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Buildings made out of mushrooms already exist, so I would say that the plausibility is very high. The vegetative part of the fungus, called mycelium, can be fashioned into to "bricks" by growing them in brick shaped molds and adding in some corn husks. Using these "bricks" a builder can construct many different types of buildings.
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
@d-b I've flagged your comment as offensive. If you were able to see the edit history and the voting history then you would understand why I made the comment I did, and see that I upvoted the answer once the edit had been made. When you have more experience you will see.
$endgroup$
– Agrajag
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The thing about mushrooms is that they grow on decay; on dead wood, plant matter and organic waste. They require either the fuel of other plants, or the symbiosis with them. In the latter case, there would either have to be millennia of cultivation and harmony between the humans and mushrooms, allowing for enough food to be provided to the mushrooms to allow for them to grow and be relatively stable. Or, trees that are large enough to support mushroom tree-houses.
So to try and answer your question, I think growing house sized mushrooms is out of the question, esp. wrt their decay cycles and relative softness. However, mushroom mattresses growing on trees could be a nice substitute.
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Can you tell me more about these mushroom tree-houses and mushroom matresses?
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
6 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "579"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Liam Morris is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f141173%2fplausibility-of-mushroom-buildings%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Prototaxites!
Fossil mushrooms are rarities. Mushrooms are the fungal equivalent of flowers - spongy, ephemeral, disposable bodies generated to serve a reproductive need. You could not use mushrooms for wood.
The prototaxites were not mushrooms. They were large and substantial; up to 7 meters high.
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/long-before-trees-overtook-the-land-earth-was-covered-by-giant-mushrooms-13709647/
They were not temporary structures like mushrooms, but perennial like trees. I deduce this from the presence of growth rings in the fossil prototaxites.
https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Transversely-sectioned-Prototaxites-fossil-This-overview-image-originating-from-a_fig1_51174561
The presence of rings means this structure endured shifts in growing conditions over time. This thing was there for many seasons. On earth, that means it weathered storms and wind: no small feat for an upright thing this size.
There is an analogous modern fungus: the bracket fungus aka "shelf fungus".
The shelf is also a spore-making body but a permanent one, and it also can persist many seasons, laying down growth rings with the seasons. Bracket fungi are as tough as wood.
https://herbarium.usu.edu/fun-with-fungi/shelf-fungi
Woody shelves may be several years old. They add a new layer of spore
tissue every growing season. The old layer is covered by the new one.
These layers look like growth rings in a tree. One author reported
counting 37 rings. Ten layers may mean the shelf is 10 years-old if
there is only one growing season (spring). If there are two growing
seasons per year (spring and fall), it may only be 5 years-old.
One of the largest shelves weighs 300 pounds…
Woody shelves are impossible to break with your hands and difficult to
cut. This toughness results from the kinds of hyphae (filaments) that
are used to construct the shelf. Easily crushed mushrooms are made of
thin-walled hyphae. Some of the hyphae in woody shelves are
thick-walled and the hyphae are interwoven making them tougher. They
resist tearing or splitting because there are no planes to split along
in the tissue.
A bracket fungus large enough could be used for wood. The medium to small ones are used to make real shelves and durable beads.
It is reasonable to assume the prototaxites were of a composition similar to modern bracket fungi and so suitable for use as a wood equivalent. A redwood-sized Prototaxite could be hollowed out and used as a dwelling.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Prototaxites!
Fossil mushrooms are rarities. Mushrooms are the fungal equivalent of flowers - spongy, ephemeral, disposable bodies generated to serve a reproductive need. You could not use mushrooms for wood.
The prototaxites were not mushrooms. They were large and substantial; up to 7 meters high.
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/long-before-trees-overtook-the-land-earth-was-covered-by-giant-mushrooms-13709647/
They were not temporary structures like mushrooms, but perennial like trees. I deduce this from the presence of growth rings in the fossil prototaxites.
https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Transversely-sectioned-Prototaxites-fossil-This-overview-image-originating-from-a_fig1_51174561
The presence of rings means this structure endured shifts in growing conditions over time. This thing was there for many seasons. On earth, that means it weathered storms and wind: no small feat for an upright thing this size.
There is an analogous modern fungus: the bracket fungus aka "shelf fungus".
The shelf is also a spore-making body but a permanent one, and it also can persist many seasons, laying down growth rings with the seasons. Bracket fungi are as tough as wood.
https://herbarium.usu.edu/fun-with-fungi/shelf-fungi
Woody shelves may be several years old. They add a new layer of spore
tissue every growing season. The old layer is covered by the new one.
These layers look like growth rings in a tree. One author reported
counting 37 rings. Ten layers may mean the shelf is 10 years-old if
there is only one growing season (spring). If there are two growing
seasons per year (spring and fall), it may only be 5 years-old.
One of the largest shelves weighs 300 pounds…
Woody shelves are impossible to break with your hands and difficult to
cut. This toughness results from the kinds of hyphae (filaments) that
are used to construct the shelf. Easily crushed mushrooms are made of
thin-walled hyphae. Some of the hyphae in woody shelves are
thick-walled and the hyphae are interwoven making them tougher. They
resist tearing or splitting because there are no planes to split along
in the tissue.
A bracket fungus large enough could be used for wood. The medium to small ones are used to make real shelves and durable beads.
It is reasonable to assume the prototaxites were of a composition similar to modern bracket fungi and so suitable for use as a wood equivalent. A redwood-sized Prototaxite could be hollowed out and used as a dwelling.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Prototaxites!
Fossil mushrooms are rarities. Mushrooms are the fungal equivalent of flowers - spongy, ephemeral, disposable bodies generated to serve a reproductive need. You could not use mushrooms for wood.
The prototaxites were not mushrooms. They were large and substantial; up to 7 meters high.
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/long-before-trees-overtook-the-land-earth-was-covered-by-giant-mushrooms-13709647/
They were not temporary structures like mushrooms, but perennial like trees. I deduce this from the presence of growth rings in the fossil prototaxites.
https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Transversely-sectioned-Prototaxites-fossil-This-overview-image-originating-from-a_fig1_51174561
The presence of rings means this structure endured shifts in growing conditions over time. This thing was there for many seasons. On earth, that means it weathered storms and wind: no small feat for an upright thing this size.
There is an analogous modern fungus: the bracket fungus aka "shelf fungus".
The shelf is also a spore-making body but a permanent one, and it also can persist many seasons, laying down growth rings with the seasons. Bracket fungi are as tough as wood.
https://herbarium.usu.edu/fun-with-fungi/shelf-fungi
Woody shelves may be several years old. They add a new layer of spore
tissue every growing season. The old layer is covered by the new one.
These layers look like growth rings in a tree. One author reported
counting 37 rings. Ten layers may mean the shelf is 10 years-old if
there is only one growing season (spring). If there are two growing
seasons per year (spring and fall), it may only be 5 years-old.
One of the largest shelves weighs 300 pounds…
Woody shelves are impossible to break with your hands and difficult to
cut. This toughness results from the kinds of hyphae (filaments) that
are used to construct the shelf. Easily crushed mushrooms are made of
thin-walled hyphae. Some of the hyphae in woody shelves are
thick-walled and the hyphae are interwoven making them tougher. They
resist tearing or splitting because there are no planes to split along
in the tissue.
A bracket fungus large enough could be used for wood. The medium to small ones are used to make real shelves and durable beads.
It is reasonable to assume the prototaxites were of a composition similar to modern bracket fungi and so suitable for use as a wood equivalent. A redwood-sized Prototaxite could be hollowed out and used as a dwelling.
$endgroup$
Prototaxites!
Fossil mushrooms are rarities. Mushrooms are the fungal equivalent of flowers - spongy, ephemeral, disposable bodies generated to serve a reproductive need. You could not use mushrooms for wood.
The prototaxites were not mushrooms. They were large and substantial; up to 7 meters high.
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/long-before-trees-overtook-the-land-earth-was-covered-by-giant-mushrooms-13709647/
They were not temporary structures like mushrooms, but perennial like trees. I deduce this from the presence of growth rings in the fossil prototaxites.
https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Transversely-sectioned-Prototaxites-fossil-This-overview-image-originating-from-a_fig1_51174561
The presence of rings means this structure endured shifts in growing conditions over time. This thing was there for many seasons. On earth, that means it weathered storms and wind: no small feat for an upright thing this size.
There is an analogous modern fungus: the bracket fungus aka "shelf fungus".
The shelf is also a spore-making body but a permanent one, and it also can persist many seasons, laying down growth rings with the seasons. Bracket fungi are as tough as wood.
https://herbarium.usu.edu/fun-with-fungi/shelf-fungi
Woody shelves may be several years old. They add a new layer of spore
tissue every growing season. The old layer is covered by the new one.
These layers look like growth rings in a tree. One author reported
counting 37 rings. Ten layers may mean the shelf is 10 years-old if
there is only one growing season (spring). If there are two growing
seasons per year (spring and fall), it may only be 5 years-old.
One of the largest shelves weighs 300 pounds…
Woody shelves are impossible to break with your hands and difficult to
cut. This toughness results from the kinds of hyphae (filaments) that
are used to construct the shelf. Easily crushed mushrooms are made of
thin-walled hyphae. Some of the hyphae in woody shelves are
thick-walled and the hyphae are interwoven making them tougher. They
resist tearing or splitting because there are no planes to split along
in the tissue.
A bracket fungus large enough could be used for wood. The medium to small ones are used to make real shelves and durable beads.
It is reasonable to assume the prototaxites were of a composition similar to modern bracket fungi and so suitable for use as a wood equivalent. A redwood-sized Prototaxite could be hollowed out and used as a dwelling.
answered 5 hours ago
WillkWillk
112k26209466
112k26209466
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Buildings made out of mushrooms already exist, so I would say that the plausibility is very high. The vegetative part of the fungus, called mycelium, can be fashioned into to "bricks" by growing them in brick shaped molds and adding in some corn husks. Using these "bricks" a builder can construct many different types of buildings.
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
@d-b I've flagged your comment as offensive. If you were able to see the edit history and the voting history then you would understand why I made the comment I did, and see that I upvoted the answer once the edit had been made. When you have more experience you will see.
$endgroup$
– Agrajag
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Buildings made out of mushrooms already exist, so I would say that the plausibility is very high. The vegetative part of the fungus, called mycelium, can be fashioned into to "bricks" by growing them in brick shaped molds and adding in some corn husks. Using these "bricks" a builder can construct many different types of buildings.
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
@d-b I've flagged your comment as offensive. If you were able to see the edit history and the voting history then you would understand why I made the comment I did, and see that I upvoted the answer once the edit had been made. When you have more experience you will see.
$endgroup$
– Agrajag
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Buildings made out of mushrooms already exist, so I would say that the plausibility is very high. The vegetative part of the fungus, called mycelium, can be fashioned into to "bricks" by growing them in brick shaped molds and adding in some corn husks. Using these "bricks" a builder can construct many different types of buildings.
New contributor
$endgroup$
Buildings made out of mushrooms already exist, so I would say that the plausibility is very high. The vegetative part of the fungus, called mycelium, can be fashioned into to "bricks" by growing them in brick shaped molds and adding in some corn husks. Using these "bricks" a builder can construct many different types of buildings.
New contributor
edited 3 hours ago
New contributor
answered 3 hours ago
SciFiGuySciFiGuy
3164
3164
New contributor
New contributor
$begingroup$
@d-b I've flagged your comment as offensive. If you were able to see the edit history and the voting history then you would understand why I made the comment I did, and see that I upvoted the answer once the edit had been made. When you have more experience you will see.
$endgroup$
– Agrajag
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
@d-b I've flagged your comment as offensive. If you were able to see the edit history and the voting history then you would understand why I made the comment I did, and see that I upvoted the answer once the edit had been made. When you have more experience you will see.
$endgroup$
– Agrajag
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@d-b I've flagged your comment as offensive. If you were able to see the edit history and the voting history then you would understand why I made the comment I did, and see that I upvoted the answer once the edit had been made. When you have more experience you will see.
$endgroup$
– Agrajag
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@d-b I've flagged your comment as offensive. If you were able to see the edit history and the voting history then you would understand why I made the comment I did, and see that I upvoted the answer once the edit had been made. When you have more experience you will see.
$endgroup$
– Agrajag
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The thing about mushrooms is that they grow on decay; on dead wood, plant matter and organic waste. They require either the fuel of other plants, or the symbiosis with them. In the latter case, there would either have to be millennia of cultivation and harmony between the humans and mushrooms, allowing for enough food to be provided to the mushrooms to allow for them to grow and be relatively stable. Or, trees that are large enough to support mushroom tree-houses.
So to try and answer your question, I think growing house sized mushrooms is out of the question, esp. wrt their decay cycles and relative softness. However, mushroom mattresses growing on trees could be a nice substitute.
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Can you tell me more about these mushroom tree-houses and mushroom matresses?
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The thing about mushrooms is that they grow on decay; on dead wood, plant matter and organic waste. They require either the fuel of other plants, or the symbiosis with them. In the latter case, there would either have to be millennia of cultivation and harmony between the humans and mushrooms, allowing for enough food to be provided to the mushrooms to allow for them to grow and be relatively stable. Or, trees that are large enough to support mushroom tree-houses.
So to try and answer your question, I think growing house sized mushrooms is out of the question, esp. wrt their decay cycles and relative softness. However, mushroom mattresses growing on trees could be a nice substitute.
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Can you tell me more about these mushroom tree-houses and mushroom matresses?
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The thing about mushrooms is that they grow on decay; on dead wood, plant matter and organic waste. They require either the fuel of other plants, or the symbiosis with them. In the latter case, there would either have to be millennia of cultivation and harmony between the humans and mushrooms, allowing for enough food to be provided to the mushrooms to allow for them to grow and be relatively stable. Or, trees that are large enough to support mushroom tree-houses.
So to try and answer your question, I think growing house sized mushrooms is out of the question, esp. wrt their decay cycles and relative softness. However, mushroom mattresses growing on trees could be a nice substitute.
New contributor
$endgroup$
The thing about mushrooms is that they grow on decay; on dead wood, plant matter and organic waste. They require either the fuel of other plants, or the symbiosis with them. In the latter case, there would either have to be millennia of cultivation and harmony between the humans and mushrooms, allowing for enough food to be provided to the mushrooms to allow for them to grow and be relatively stable. Or, trees that are large enough to support mushroom tree-houses.
So to try and answer your question, I think growing house sized mushrooms is out of the question, esp. wrt their decay cycles and relative softness. However, mushroom mattresses growing on trees could be a nice substitute.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 6 hours ago
Aloysius AniseAloysius Anise
464
464
New contributor
New contributor
$begingroup$
Can you tell me more about these mushroom tree-houses and mushroom matresses?
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Can you tell me more about these mushroom tree-houses and mushroom matresses?
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Can you tell me more about these mushroom tree-houses and mushroom matresses?
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Can you tell me more about these mushroom tree-houses and mushroom matresses?
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
6 hours ago
add a comment |
Liam Morris is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Liam Morris is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Liam Morris is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Liam Morris is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f141173%2fplausibility-of-mushroom-buildings%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Welcome to Worldbuilding.SE! We're glad you could join us! When you have a moment, please click here to learn more about our culture and take our tour. The SE model is one-specific-question/one-best-answer. You've asked multiple questions, which will likely get the question closed as too broad. Can you narrow this down to one, specific question? (You can always ask more questions.)
$endgroup$
– JBH
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@JBH Thank you. I have edited out the second, less important question. I thought that the two would have been closely-related enough as to not appear too broad but better safe than sorry.
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
6 hours ago