What is the word used to describe the redundancy of using two synonyms to define one thing?












1
















  • Incorrect: a baby lamb

  • Correct?: 'a baby sheep', or just 'a lamb'


Is there even one word used to describe this duplication? Or would you just identify the mistake as "a redundant word"?










share|improve this question




















  • 2





    A pleonasm: the use of more words than are required to express an idea.

    – user66974
    May 27 '15 at 5:09






  • 2





    In your particular example "baby" adds a little more than just emphasis. If a lamb is "a young sheep", a "baby lamb" is younger still -- not much more than a newborn (and presumably too cute to taste good -- yet).

    – Chris H
    May 27 '15 at 10:09











  • See my tongue-in-cheek answer at english.stackexchange.com/questions/375945/…

    – Mark Hubbard
    Jul 26 '18 at 14:33











  • A doublet of synonyms is frequently used for emphasis.

    – Glenn
    Aug 6 '18 at 15:40











  • It's called "English".

    – Hot Licks
    2 hours ago
















1
















  • Incorrect: a baby lamb

  • Correct?: 'a baby sheep', or just 'a lamb'


Is there even one word used to describe this duplication? Or would you just identify the mistake as "a redundant word"?










share|improve this question




















  • 2





    A pleonasm: the use of more words than are required to express an idea.

    – user66974
    May 27 '15 at 5:09






  • 2





    In your particular example "baby" adds a little more than just emphasis. If a lamb is "a young sheep", a "baby lamb" is younger still -- not much more than a newborn (and presumably too cute to taste good -- yet).

    – Chris H
    May 27 '15 at 10:09











  • See my tongue-in-cheek answer at english.stackexchange.com/questions/375945/…

    – Mark Hubbard
    Jul 26 '18 at 14:33











  • A doublet of synonyms is frequently used for emphasis.

    – Glenn
    Aug 6 '18 at 15:40











  • It's called "English".

    – Hot Licks
    2 hours ago














1












1








1









  • Incorrect: a baby lamb

  • Correct?: 'a baby sheep', or just 'a lamb'


Is there even one word used to describe this duplication? Or would you just identify the mistake as "a redundant word"?










share|improve this question

















  • Incorrect: a baby lamb

  • Correct?: 'a baby sheep', or just 'a lamb'


Is there even one word used to describe this duplication? Or would you just identify the mistake as "a redundant word"?







single-word-requests






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 7 hours ago









Laurel

33k664117




33k664117










asked May 27 '15 at 5:03









Jessica HolmesJessica Holmes

1413




1413








  • 2





    A pleonasm: the use of more words than are required to express an idea.

    – user66974
    May 27 '15 at 5:09






  • 2





    In your particular example "baby" adds a little more than just emphasis. If a lamb is "a young sheep", a "baby lamb" is younger still -- not much more than a newborn (and presumably too cute to taste good -- yet).

    – Chris H
    May 27 '15 at 10:09











  • See my tongue-in-cheek answer at english.stackexchange.com/questions/375945/…

    – Mark Hubbard
    Jul 26 '18 at 14:33











  • A doublet of synonyms is frequently used for emphasis.

    – Glenn
    Aug 6 '18 at 15:40











  • It's called "English".

    – Hot Licks
    2 hours ago














  • 2





    A pleonasm: the use of more words than are required to express an idea.

    – user66974
    May 27 '15 at 5:09






  • 2





    In your particular example "baby" adds a little more than just emphasis. If a lamb is "a young sheep", a "baby lamb" is younger still -- not much more than a newborn (and presumably too cute to taste good -- yet).

    – Chris H
    May 27 '15 at 10:09











  • See my tongue-in-cheek answer at english.stackexchange.com/questions/375945/…

    – Mark Hubbard
    Jul 26 '18 at 14:33











  • A doublet of synonyms is frequently used for emphasis.

    – Glenn
    Aug 6 '18 at 15:40











  • It's called "English".

    – Hot Licks
    2 hours ago








2




2





A pleonasm: the use of more words than are required to express an idea.

– user66974
May 27 '15 at 5:09





A pleonasm: the use of more words than are required to express an idea.

– user66974
May 27 '15 at 5:09




2




2





In your particular example "baby" adds a little more than just emphasis. If a lamb is "a young sheep", a "baby lamb" is younger still -- not much more than a newborn (and presumably too cute to taste good -- yet).

– Chris H
May 27 '15 at 10:09





In your particular example "baby" adds a little more than just emphasis. If a lamb is "a young sheep", a "baby lamb" is younger still -- not much more than a newborn (and presumably too cute to taste good -- yet).

– Chris H
May 27 '15 at 10:09













See my tongue-in-cheek answer at english.stackexchange.com/questions/375945/…

– Mark Hubbard
Jul 26 '18 at 14:33





See my tongue-in-cheek answer at english.stackexchange.com/questions/375945/…

– Mark Hubbard
Jul 26 '18 at 14:33













A doublet of synonyms is frequently used for emphasis.

– Glenn
Aug 6 '18 at 15:40





A doublet of synonyms is frequently used for emphasis.

– Glenn
Aug 6 '18 at 15:40













It's called "English".

– Hot Licks
2 hours ago





It's called "English".

– Hot Licks
2 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2














It seems that the linguistic term is "redundancy":




In English usage, redundancy is usually defined as the use of two or more words that say the same thing, but we also use the term to refer to any expression in which a modifier’s meaning is contained in the word it modifies (e.g., early beginnings, merge together—many more are listed below). Think of redundancies as word overflows.



This list is far from complete, and we’re developing it organically (i.e., adding redundancies as they come up in our work) rather than compiling the list by stealing from other online sources, which would be too easy. If you feel strongly that any redundancy should be added here, please comment.




Or, as Josh61 noted, pleonasms, specifically semantic pleonasms:




Pleonasm (/ˈpliːənæzəm/, from Greek πλεονασμός pleonasmos from πλέον pleon "more, too much") is the use of more words or parts of words than is necessary for clear expression: examples are black darkness, or burning fire. Such redundancy is, by traditional rhetorical criteria, a manifestation of tautology.



Semantic pleonasm is a question more of style and usage than of grammar. Linguists usually call this redundancy to avoid confusion with syntactic pleonasm, a more important phenomenon for theoretical linguistics.







share|improve this answer































    0














    Tautology!



    The saying of the same thing twice over in different words, generally considered to be a fault of style (e.g. they arrived one after the other in succession ).
    synonyms: repetition, repetitiveness, repetitiousness, reiteration, redundancy, superfluity, periphrasis, iteration, duplication; More
    a phrase or expression in which the same thing is said twice in different words.
    plural noun: tautologies
    LOGIC
    a statement that is true by necessity or by virtue of its logical form.






    share|improve this answer
























    • 'Baby' and 'lamb' are different things. Had the writer said, 'an infant sheep, just a lamb' that would be a tautology. The two comments have expressed all that can be said and your answer has neither added anything more, nor is it correct. But do not be discouraged. Keep trying.

      – Nigel J
      Nov 17 '17 at 4:39











    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "97"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f248760%2fwhat-is-the-word-used-to-describe-the-redundancy-of-using-two-synonyms-to-define%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2














    It seems that the linguistic term is "redundancy":




    In English usage, redundancy is usually defined as the use of two or more words that say the same thing, but we also use the term to refer to any expression in which a modifier’s meaning is contained in the word it modifies (e.g., early beginnings, merge together—many more are listed below). Think of redundancies as word overflows.



    This list is far from complete, and we’re developing it organically (i.e., adding redundancies as they come up in our work) rather than compiling the list by stealing from other online sources, which would be too easy. If you feel strongly that any redundancy should be added here, please comment.




    Or, as Josh61 noted, pleonasms, specifically semantic pleonasms:




    Pleonasm (/ˈpliːənæzəm/, from Greek πλεονασμός pleonasmos from πλέον pleon "more, too much") is the use of more words or parts of words than is necessary for clear expression: examples are black darkness, or burning fire. Such redundancy is, by traditional rhetorical criteria, a manifestation of tautology.



    Semantic pleonasm is a question more of style and usage than of grammar. Linguists usually call this redundancy to avoid confusion with syntactic pleonasm, a more important phenomenon for theoretical linguistics.







    share|improve this answer




























      2














      It seems that the linguistic term is "redundancy":




      In English usage, redundancy is usually defined as the use of two or more words that say the same thing, but we also use the term to refer to any expression in which a modifier’s meaning is contained in the word it modifies (e.g., early beginnings, merge together—many more are listed below). Think of redundancies as word overflows.



      This list is far from complete, and we’re developing it organically (i.e., adding redundancies as they come up in our work) rather than compiling the list by stealing from other online sources, which would be too easy. If you feel strongly that any redundancy should be added here, please comment.




      Or, as Josh61 noted, pleonasms, specifically semantic pleonasms:




      Pleonasm (/ˈpliːənæzəm/, from Greek πλεονασμός pleonasmos from πλέον pleon "more, too much") is the use of more words or parts of words than is necessary for clear expression: examples are black darkness, or burning fire. Such redundancy is, by traditional rhetorical criteria, a manifestation of tautology.



      Semantic pleonasm is a question more of style and usage than of grammar. Linguists usually call this redundancy to avoid confusion with syntactic pleonasm, a more important phenomenon for theoretical linguistics.







      share|improve this answer


























        2












        2








        2







        It seems that the linguistic term is "redundancy":




        In English usage, redundancy is usually defined as the use of two or more words that say the same thing, but we also use the term to refer to any expression in which a modifier’s meaning is contained in the word it modifies (e.g., early beginnings, merge together—many more are listed below). Think of redundancies as word overflows.



        This list is far from complete, and we’re developing it organically (i.e., adding redundancies as they come up in our work) rather than compiling the list by stealing from other online sources, which would be too easy. If you feel strongly that any redundancy should be added here, please comment.




        Or, as Josh61 noted, pleonasms, specifically semantic pleonasms:




        Pleonasm (/ˈpliːənæzəm/, from Greek πλεονασμός pleonasmos from πλέον pleon "more, too much") is the use of more words or parts of words than is necessary for clear expression: examples are black darkness, or burning fire. Such redundancy is, by traditional rhetorical criteria, a manifestation of tautology.



        Semantic pleonasm is a question more of style and usage than of grammar. Linguists usually call this redundancy to avoid confusion with syntactic pleonasm, a more important phenomenon for theoretical linguistics.







        share|improve this answer













        It seems that the linguistic term is "redundancy":




        In English usage, redundancy is usually defined as the use of two or more words that say the same thing, but we also use the term to refer to any expression in which a modifier’s meaning is contained in the word it modifies (e.g., early beginnings, merge together—many more are listed below). Think of redundancies as word overflows.



        This list is far from complete, and we’re developing it organically (i.e., adding redundancies as they come up in our work) rather than compiling the list by stealing from other online sources, which would be too easy. If you feel strongly that any redundancy should be added here, please comment.




        Or, as Josh61 noted, pleonasms, specifically semantic pleonasms:




        Pleonasm (/ˈpliːənæzəm/, from Greek πλεονασμός pleonasmos from πλέον pleon "more, too much") is the use of more words or parts of words than is necessary for clear expression: examples are black darkness, or burning fire. Such redundancy is, by traditional rhetorical criteria, a manifestation of tautology.



        Semantic pleonasm is a question more of style and usage than of grammar. Linguists usually call this redundancy to avoid confusion with syntactic pleonasm, a more important phenomenon for theoretical linguistics.








        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered May 27 '15 at 6:20









        CatijaCatija

        3,4041224




        3,4041224

























            0














            Tautology!



            The saying of the same thing twice over in different words, generally considered to be a fault of style (e.g. they arrived one after the other in succession ).
            synonyms: repetition, repetitiveness, repetitiousness, reiteration, redundancy, superfluity, periphrasis, iteration, duplication; More
            a phrase or expression in which the same thing is said twice in different words.
            plural noun: tautologies
            LOGIC
            a statement that is true by necessity or by virtue of its logical form.






            share|improve this answer
























            • 'Baby' and 'lamb' are different things. Had the writer said, 'an infant sheep, just a lamb' that would be a tautology. The two comments have expressed all that can be said and your answer has neither added anything more, nor is it correct. But do not be discouraged. Keep trying.

              – Nigel J
              Nov 17 '17 at 4:39
















            0














            Tautology!



            The saying of the same thing twice over in different words, generally considered to be a fault of style (e.g. they arrived one after the other in succession ).
            synonyms: repetition, repetitiveness, repetitiousness, reiteration, redundancy, superfluity, periphrasis, iteration, duplication; More
            a phrase or expression in which the same thing is said twice in different words.
            plural noun: tautologies
            LOGIC
            a statement that is true by necessity or by virtue of its logical form.






            share|improve this answer
























            • 'Baby' and 'lamb' are different things. Had the writer said, 'an infant sheep, just a lamb' that would be a tautology. The two comments have expressed all that can be said and your answer has neither added anything more, nor is it correct. But do not be discouraged. Keep trying.

              – Nigel J
              Nov 17 '17 at 4:39














            0












            0








            0







            Tautology!



            The saying of the same thing twice over in different words, generally considered to be a fault of style (e.g. they arrived one after the other in succession ).
            synonyms: repetition, repetitiveness, repetitiousness, reiteration, redundancy, superfluity, periphrasis, iteration, duplication; More
            a phrase or expression in which the same thing is said twice in different words.
            plural noun: tautologies
            LOGIC
            a statement that is true by necessity or by virtue of its logical form.






            share|improve this answer













            Tautology!



            The saying of the same thing twice over in different words, generally considered to be a fault of style (e.g. they arrived one after the other in succession ).
            synonyms: repetition, repetitiveness, repetitiousness, reiteration, redundancy, superfluity, periphrasis, iteration, duplication; More
            a phrase or expression in which the same thing is said twice in different words.
            plural noun: tautologies
            LOGIC
            a statement that is true by necessity or by virtue of its logical form.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Nov 17 '17 at 2:15









            Shrenik JobanputraShrenik Jobanputra

            91




            91













            • 'Baby' and 'lamb' are different things. Had the writer said, 'an infant sheep, just a lamb' that would be a tautology. The two comments have expressed all that can be said and your answer has neither added anything more, nor is it correct. But do not be discouraged. Keep trying.

              – Nigel J
              Nov 17 '17 at 4:39



















            • 'Baby' and 'lamb' are different things. Had the writer said, 'an infant sheep, just a lamb' that would be a tautology. The two comments have expressed all that can be said and your answer has neither added anything more, nor is it correct. But do not be discouraged. Keep trying.

              – Nigel J
              Nov 17 '17 at 4:39

















            'Baby' and 'lamb' are different things. Had the writer said, 'an infant sheep, just a lamb' that would be a tautology. The two comments have expressed all that can be said and your answer has neither added anything more, nor is it correct. But do not be discouraged. Keep trying.

            – Nigel J
            Nov 17 '17 at 4:39





            'Baby' and 'lamb' are different things. Had the writer said, 'an infant sheep, just a lamb' that would be a tautology. The two comments have expressed all that can be said and your answer has neither added anything more, nor is it correct. But do not be discouraged. Keep trying.

            – Nigel J
            Nov 17 '17 at 4:39


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f248760%2fwhat-is-the-word-used-to-describe-the-redundancy-of-using-two-synonyms-to-define%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

            Alcedinidae

            Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]