A term that would define someone who'd prefer to inflict the most pain on someone they sought revenge on...





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







0















This might contain spoilers on Infinity War. At the end, when Thanos completed the Gauntlet with all the stones, rather than killing him quickly with his axe, Thor decided to first make sure Thanos feels pain for all the thing he's done. What would you call Thor in this scenario?



It doesn't need to specifically cater to the description I gave, it could be something that would generally describe him, such as "Malevolent".










share|improve this question















closed as off-topic by tchrist Apr 6 at 1:49


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – tchrist

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

















  • Hello, Martian, and welcome to EL&U. You are asking for a single word specific to this situation, and it may not exist. There are words which could be used, but they are more general, such as : cruel, vindictive,etc. Also, you need to provide a sample sentence with a blank in it to insert the target language.

    – Cascabel
    Apr 5 at 16:51













  • Yes yes, I may need to edit my description (and I will), but those are mostly what I am looking for. General words close to what I described.

    – Martian Marcera
    Apr 5 at 17:03











  • Just as a note, Thor did try to kill Thanos quickly with his axe . . .

    – Jason Bassford
    Apr 5 at 23:14











  • @JasonBassford Thor has an axe? What? The hammer wasn't good enough?

    – Cascabel
    Apr 5 at 23:50













  • @JasonBassford well, I would disagree. Thanos worded it perfectly, "You should have gone with the head." But, this isn't a movie review site.

    – Martian Marcera
    Apr 6 at 2:59


















0















This might contain spoilers on Infinity War. At the end, when Thanos completed the Gauntlet with all the stones, rather than killing him quickly with his axe, Thor decided to first make sure Thanos feels pain for all the thing he's done. What would you call Thor in this scenario?



It doesn't need to specifically cater to the description I gave, it could be something that would generally describe him, such as "Malevolent".










share|improve this question















closed as off-topic by tchrist Apr 6 at 1:49


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – tchrist

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

















  • Hello, Martian, and welcome to EL&U. You are asking for a single word specific to this situation, and it may not exist. There are words which could be used, but they are more general, such as : cruel, vindictive,etc. Also, you need to provide a sample sentence with a blank in it to insert the target language.

    – Cascabel
    Apr 5 at 16:51













  • Yes yes, I may need to edit my description (and I will), but those are mostly what I am looking for. General words close to what I described.

    – Martian Marcera
    Apr 5 at 17:03











  • Just as a note, Thor did try to kill Thanos quickly with his axe . . .

    – Jason Bassford
    Apr 5 at 23:14











  • @JasonBassford Thor has an axe? What? The hammer wasn't good enough?

    – Cascabel
    Apr 5 at 23:50













  • @JasonBassford well, I would disagree. Thanos worded it perfectly, "You should have gone with the head." But, this isn't a movie review site.

    – Martian Marcera
    Apr 6 at 2:59














0












0








0








This might contain spoilers on Infinity War. At the end, when Thanos completed the Gauntlet with all the stones, rather than killing him quickly with his axe, Thor decided to first make sure Thanos feels pain for all the thing he's done. What would you call Thor in this scenario?



It doesn't need to specifically cater to the description I gave, it could be something that would generally describe him, such as "Malevolent".










share|improve this question
















This might contain spoilers on Infinity War. At the end, when Thanos completed the Gauntlet with all the stones, rather than killing him quickly with his axe, Thor decided to first make sure Thanos feels pain for all the thing he's done. What would you call Thor in this scenario?



It doesn't need to specifically cater to the description I gave, it could be something that would generally describe him, such as "Malevolent".







single-word-requests






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 5 at 17:18







Martian Marcera

















asked Apr 5 at 16:14









Martian MarceraMartian Marcera

224




224




closed as off-topic by tchrist Apr 6 at 1:49


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – tchrist

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







closed as off-topic by tchrist Apr 6 at 1:49


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – tchrist

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • Hello, Martian, and welcome to EL&U. You are asking for a single word specific to this situation, and it may not exist. There are words which could be used, but they are more general, such as : cruel, vindictive,etc. Also, you need to provide a sample sentence with a blank in it to insert the target language.

    – Cascabel
    Apr 5 at 16:51













  • Yes yes, I may need to edit my description (and I will), but those are mostly what I am looking for. General words close to what I described.

    – Martian Marcera
    Apr 5 at 17:03











  • Just as a note, Thor did try to kill Thanos quickly with his axe . . .

    – Jason Bassford
    Apr 5 at 23:14











  • @JasonBassford Thor has an axe? What? The hammer wasn't good enough?

    – Cascabel
    Apr 5 at 23:50













  • @JasonBassford well, I would disagree. Thanos worded it perfectly, "You should have gone with the head." But, this isn't a movie review site.

    – Martian Marcera
    Apr 6 at 2:59



















  • Hello, Martian, and welcome to EL&U. You are asking for a single word specific to this situation, and it may not exist. There are words which could be used, but they are more general, such as : cruel, vindictive,etc. Also, you need to provide a sample sentence with a blank in it to insert the target language.

    – Cascabel
    Apr 5 at 16:51













  • Yes yes, I may need to edit my description (and I will), but those are mostly what I am looking for. General words close to what I described.

    – Martian Marcera
    Apr 5 at 17:03











  • Just as a note, Thor did try to kill Thanos quickly with his axe . . .

    – Jason Bassford
    Apr 5 at 23:14











  • @JasonBassford Thor has an axe? What? The hammer wasn't good enough?

    – Cascabel
    Apr 5 at 23:50













  • @JasonBassford well, I would disagree. Thanos worded it perfectly, "You should have gone with the head." But, this isn't a movie review site.

    – Martian Marcera
    Apr 6 at 2:59

















Hello, Martian, and welcome to EL&U. You are asking for a single word specific to this situation, and it may not exist. There are words which could be used, but they are more general, such as : cruel, vindictive,etc. Also, you need to provide a sample sentence with a blank in it to insert the target language.

– Cascabel
Apr 5 at 16:51







Hello, Martian, and welcome to EL&U. You are asking for a single word specific to this situation, and it may not exist. There are words which could be used, but they are more general, such as : cruel, vindictive,etc. Also, you need to provide a sample sentence with a blank in it to insert the target language.

– Cascabel
Apr 5 at 16:51















Yes yes, I may need to edit my description (and I will), but those are mostly what I am looking for. General words close to what I described.

– Martian Marcera
Apr 5 at 17:03





Yes yes, I may need to edit my description (and I will), but those are mostly what I am looking for. General words close to what I described.

– Martian Marcera
Apr 5 at 17:03













Just as a note, Thor did try to kill Thanos quickly with his axe . . .

– Jason Bassford
Apr 5 at 23:14





Just as a note, Thor did try to kill Thanos quickly with his axe . . .

– Jason Bassford
Apr 5 at 23:14













@JasonBassford Thor has an axe? What? The hammer wasn't good enough?

– Cascabel
Apr 5 at 23:50







@JasonBassford Thor has an axe? What? The hammer wasn't good enough?

– Cascabel
Apr 5 at 23:50















@JasonBassford well, I would disagree. Thanos worded it perfectly, "You should have gone with the head." But, this isn't a movie review site.

– Martian Marcera
Apr 6 at 2:59





@JasonBassford well, I would disagree. Thanos worded it perfectly, "You should have gone with the head." But, this isn't a movie review site.

– Martian Marcera
Apr 6 at 2:59










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2














You could describe them as "cruel" or "inhumane." If you want to emphasize the revenge aspect, you could call them "vengeful." To incorporate the idea that they aren't satisfied with an eye for an eye, you could call them "implacably vengeful."






share|improve this answer































    2














    The term sadist or sadism or sadistic works for me.




    The deriving of pleasure from cruelty; thus, a person deriving pleasure from cruelty is a sadist. Adjectival form is sadistic.




    I guess you could say that sadism is an extreme form of schadenfreude, which is the delight one feels in the misfortune or pain of someone else.






    share|improve this answer





















    • 1





      Sadism doesn't suggest that the victim of sadism is guilty of something.

      – We oath to creation
      Apr 5 at 17:44











    • I agree with KTM. However you are going at this in the right direction, Rhetorician. Schadenfroh is an adjective derived from Schadenfreude, so that may work as well.

      – Martian Marcera
      Apr 5 at 18:33


















    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2














    You could describe them as "cruel" or "inhumane." If you want to emphasize the revenge aspect, you could call them "vengeful." To incorporate the idea that they aren't satisfied with an eye for an eye, you could call them "implacably vengeful."






    share|improve this answer




























      2














      You could describe them as "cruel" or "inhumane." If you want to emphasize the revenge aspect, you could call them "vengeful." To incorporate the idea that they aren't satisfied with an eye for an eye, you could call them "implacably vengeful."






      share|improve this answer


























        2












        2








        2







        You could describe them as "cruel" or "inhumane." If you want to emphasize the revenge aspect, you could call them "vengeful." To incorporate the idea that they aren't satisfied with an eye for an eye, you could call them "implacably vengeful."






        share|improve this answer













        You could describe them as "cruel" or "inhumane." If you want to emphasize the revenge aspect, you could call them "vengeful." To incorporate the idea that they aren't satisfied with an eye for an eye, you could call them "implacably vengeful."







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Apr 5 at 23:49









        QazQaz

        3,12421123




        3,12421123

























            2














            The term sadist or sadism or sadistic works for me.




            The deriving of pleasure from cruelty; thus, a person deriving pleasure from cruelty is a sadist. Adjectival form is sadistic.




            I guess you could say that sadism is an extreme form of schadenfreude, which is the delight one feels in the misfortune or pain of someone else.






            share|improve this answer





















            • 1





              Sadism doesn't suggest that the victim of sadism is guilty of something.

              – We oath to creation
              Apr 5 at 17:44











            • I agree with KTM. However you are going at this in the right direction, Rhetorician. Schadenfroh is an adjective derived from Schadenfreude, so that may work as well.

              – Martian Marcera
              Apr 5 at 18:33
















            2














            The term sadist or sadism or sadistic works for me.




            The deriving of pleasure from cruelty; thus, a person deriving pleasure from cruelty is a sadist. Adjectival form is sadistic.




            I guess you could say that sadism is an extreme form of schadenfreude, which is the delight one feels in the misfortune or pain of someone else.






            share|improve this answer





















            • 1





              Sadism doesn't suggest that the victim of sadism is guilty of something.

              – We oath to creation
              Apr 5 at 17:44











            • I agree with KTM. However you are going at this in the right direction, Rhetorician. Schadenfroh is an adjective derived from Schadenfreude, so that may work as well.

              – Martian Marcera
              Apr 5 at 18:33














            2












            2








            2







            The term sadist or sadism or sadistic works for me.




            The deriving of pleasure from cruelty; thus, a person deriving pleasure from cruelty is a sadist. Adjectival form is sadistic.




            I guess you could say that sadism is an extreme form of schadenfreude, which is the delight one feels in the misfortune or pain of someone else.






            share|improve this answer















            The term sadist or sadism or sadistic works for me.




            The deriving of pleasure from cruelty; thus, a person deriving pleasure from cruelty is a sadist. Adjectival form is sadistic.




            I guess you could say that sadism is an extreme form of schadenfreude, which is the delight one feels in the misfortune or pain of someone else.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Apr 6 at 1:21

























            answered Apr 5 at 17:41









            rhetoricianrhetorician

            16.6k22253




            16.6k22253








            • 1





              Sadism doesn't suggest that the victim of sadism is guilty of something.

              – We oath to creation
              Apr 5 at 17:44











            • I agree with KTM. However you are going at this in the right direction, Rhetorician. Schadenfroh is an adjective derived from Schadenfreude, so that may work as well.

              – Martian Marcera
              Apr 5 at 18:33














            • 1





              Sadism doesn't suggest that the victim of sadism is guilty of something.

              – We oath to creation
              Apr 5 at 17:44











            • I agree with KTM. However you are going at this in the right direction, Rhetorician. Schadenfroh is an adjective derived from Schadenfreude, so that may work as well.

              – Martian Marcera
              Apr 5 at 18:33








            1




            1





            Sadism doesn't suggest that the victim of sadism is guilty of something.

            – We oath to creation
            Apr 5 at 17:44





            Sadism doesn't suggest that the victim of sadism is guilty of something.

            – We oath to creation
            Apr 5 at 17:44













            I agree with KTM. However you are going at this in the right direction, Rhetorician. Schadenfroh is an adjective derived from Schadenfreude, so that may work as well.

            – Martian Marcera
            Apr 5 at 18:33





            I agree with KTM. However you are going at this in the right direction, Rhetorician. Schadenfroh is an adjective derived from Schadenfreude, so that may work as well.

            – Martian Marcera
            Apr 5 at 18:33



            Popular posts from this blog

            Paul Cézanne

            UIScrollView CustomStickyHeader Resize height generates problems when scroll is too fast

            Angular material date-picker (MatDatepicker) auto completes the date on focus out