Dragon forelimb placement
$begingroup$
Most dragons (before Skyrim and GoT) had six limbs in total, four legs and a pair of wings.
The question is how would a dragon's forelimbs be placed? It's obvious they have good terrestrial capabilities, without having long noodle legs. But then there's the flight muscle, it needs lots of space and a large attachment site, same goes for the wings. But how should I put the front legs on the dragon so that it doesn't interfere with the wings' motion? Sure, those things only move during climb out, but it' still troubling. Whatever I choose should be compact.
How and where would the front limbs of the dragon connect to the rest of the skeleton?
science-based creature-design dragons bio-mechanics
edited Apr 6 at 18:38
Cyn
12k12758
asked Apr 6 at 17:07
MephistophelesMephistopheles
2,2392935
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Most dragons (before Skyrim and GoT) had six limbs in total, four legs and a pair of wings.
The question is how would a dragon's forelimbs be placed? It's obvious they have good terrestrial capabilities, without having long noodle legs. But then there's the flight muscle, it needs lots of space and a large attachment site, same goes for the wings. But how should I put the front legs on the dragon so that it doesn't interfere with the wings' motion? Sure, those things only move during climb out, but it' still troubling. Whatever I choose should be compact.
How and where would the front limbs of the dragon connect to the rest of the skeleton?
science-based creature-design dragons bio-mechanics
edited Apr 6 at 18:38
Cyn
12k12758
asked Apr 6 at 17:07
MephistophelesMephistopheles
2,2392935
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Depends on the dragon's attitude in flight. The wings must attach to the spinal column so that when the dragon assumes the flight attitude the attachment is above the center of gravity (or maybe a little forward of it if the dragon has a suitable tail which can act as an airfoil). Conversely, if you fix the attachment of the wings to the spinal column you can assume that in flight the dragon will assume the attitude which brings the center of gravity below the wing attachment point. As for the muscles, they don't interfere; flight muscles attach most likely to the sternum, unlike limb muscles.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
Apr 6 at 17:44
$begingroup$
There is no way to answer this question where it would connect would depend entirely on how and where the limb evolved, what joints it has, and where the muscles are ect. flight musculature is not uniform in vertebrates. Birds and bats have a very different layout of flight muscles for instance. Since we don't know these things we can not give a definitive answer, there are many many correct answers. The only thing you can do is lay out the limbs so their range of movements do not meet each other.
$endgroup$
– John
Apr 6 at 21:33
$begingroup$
I can suggest you look at the art from, A Natural History of Dragons: A Memoir by Lady Trent, it has probably the most sound anatomy I have ever seen for dragons, with a minimum of interference between the limbs. This will show you at least one way it can be done.
$endgroup$
– John
Apr 6 at 21:38
$begingroup$
But do dragons really need large flight muscles? If they exist in a world with magic, then a reasonable explanation is that they evolved a natural flight magic that offsets their mass and lets their wings be much weaker than otherwise required. Same explanation for the firebreathing - human mages study to recreate the same fire spells that dragons know genetically.
$endgroup$
– Sir Adelaide
Apr 7 at 12:12
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Most dragons (before Skyrim and GoT) had six limbs in total, four legs and a pair of wings.
The question is how would a dragon's forelimbs be placed? It's obvious they have good terrestrial capabilities, without having long noodle legs. But then there's the flight muscle, it needs lots of space and a large attachment site, same goes for the wings. But how should I put the front legs on the dragon so that it doesn't interfere with the wings' motion? Sure, those things only move during climb out, but it' still troubling. Whatever I choose should be compact.
How and where would the front limbs of the dragon connect to the rest of the skeleton?
science-based creature-design dragons bio-mechanics
edited Apr 6 at 18:38
Cyn
12k12758
asked Apr 6 at 17:07
MephistophelesMephistopheles
2,2392935
$endgroup$
Most dragons (before Skyrim and GoT) had six limbs in total, four legs and a pair of wings.
The question is how would a dragon's forelimbs be placed? It's obvious they have good terrestrial capabilities, without having long noodle legs. But then there's the flight muscle, it needs lots of space and a large attachment site, same goes for the wings. But how should I put the front legs on the dragon so that it doesn't interfere with the wings' motion? Sure, those things only move during climb out, but it' still troubling. Whatever I choose should be compact.
How and where would the front limbs of the dragon connect to the rest of the skeleton?
science-based creature-design dragons bio-mechanics
science-based creature-design dragons bio-mechanics
edited Apr 6 at 18:38
Cyn
12k12758
asked Apr 6 at 17:07
MephistophelesMephistopheles
2,2392935
edited Apr 6 at 18:38
Cyn
12k12758
asked Apr 6 at 17:07
MephistophelesMephistopheles
2,2392935
edited Apr 6 at 18:38
Cyn
12k12758
edited Apr 6 at 18:38
Cyn
12k12758
edited Apr 6 at 18:38
Cyn
12k12758
12k12758
asked Apr 6 at 17:07
MephistophelesMephistopheles
2,2392935
asked Apr 6 at 17:07
MephistophelesMephistopheles
2,2392935
asked Apr 6 at 17:07
MephistophelesMephistopheles
2,2392935
2,2392935
$begingroup$
Depends on the dragon's attitude in flight. The wings must attach to the spinal column so that when the dragon assumes the flight attitude the attachment is above the center of gravity (or maybe a little forward of it if the dragon has a suitable tail which can act as an airfoil). Conversely, if you fix the attachment of the wings to the spinal column you can assume that in flight the dragon will assume the attitude which brings the center of gravity below the wing attachment point. As for the muscles, they don't interfere; flight muscles attach most likely to the sternum, unlike limb muscles.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
Apr 6 at 17:44
$begingroup$
There is no way to answer this question where it would connect would depend entirely on how and where the limb evolved, what joints it has, and where the muscles are ect. flight musculature is not uniform in vertebrates. Birds and bats have a very different layout of flight muscles for instance. Since we don't know these things we can not give a definitive answer, there are many many correct answers. The only thing you can do is lay out the limbs so their range of movements do not meet each other.
$endgroup$
– John
Apr 6 at 21:33
$begingroup$
I can suggest you look at the art from, A Natural History of Dragons: A Memoir by Lady Trent, it has probably the most sound anatomy I have ever seen for dragons, with a minimum of interference between the limbs. This will show you at least one way it can be done.
$endgroup$
– John
Apr 6 at 21:38
$begingroup$
But do dragons really need large flight muscles? If they exist in a world with magic, then a reasonable explanation is that they evolved a natural flight magic that offsets their mass and lets their wings be much weaker than otherwise required. Same explanation for the firebreathing - human mages study to recreate the same fire spells that dragons know genetically.
$endgroup$
– Sir Adelaide
Apr 7 at 12:12
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Depends on the dragon's attitude in flight. The wings must attach to the spinal column so that when the dragon assumes the flight attitude the attachment is above the center of gravity (or maybe a little forward of it if the dragon has a suitable tail which can act as an airfoil). Conversely, if you fix the attachment of the wings to the spinal column you can assume that in flight the dragon will assume the attitude which brings the center of gravity below the wing attachment point. As for the muscles, they don't interfere; flight muscles attach most likely to the sternum, unlike limb muscles.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
Apr 6 at 17:44
$begingroup$
There is no way to answer this question where it would connect would depend entirely on how and where the limb evolved, what joints it has, and where the muscles are ect. flight musculature is not uniform in vertebrates. Birds and bats have a very different layout of flight muscles for instance. Since we don't know these things we can not give a definitive answer, there are many many correct answers. The only thing you can do is lay out the limbs so their range of movements do not meet each other.
$endgroup$
– John
Apr 6 at 21:33
$begingroup$
I can suggest you look at the art from, A Natural History of Dragons: A Memoir by Lady Trent, it has probably the most sound anatomy I have ever seen for dragons, with a minimum of interference between the limbs. This will show you at least one way it can be done.
$endgroup$
– John
Apr 6 at 21:38
$begingroup$
But do dragons really need large flight muscles? If they exist in a world with magic, then a reasonable explanation is that they evolved a natural flight magic that offsets their mass and lets their wings be much weaker than otherwise required. Same explanation for the firebreathing - human mages study to recreate the same fire spells that dragons know genetically.
$endgroup$
– Sir Adelaide
Apr 7 at 12:12
$begingroup$
Depends on the dragon's attitude in flight. The wings must attach to the spinal column so that when the dragon assumes the flight attitude the attachment is above the center of gravity (or maybe a little forward of it if the dragon has a suitable tail which can act as an airfoil). Conversely, if you fix the attachment of the wings to the spinal column you can assume that in flight the dragon will assume the attitude which brings the center of gravity below the wing attachment point. As for the muscles, they don't interfere; flight muscles attach most likely to the sternum, unlike limb muscles.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
Apr 6 at 17:44
$begingroup$
Depends on the dragon's attitude in flight. The wings must attach to the spinal column so that when the dragon assumes the flight attitude the attachment is above the center of gravity (or maybe a little forward of it if the dragon has a suitable tail which can act as an airfoil). Conversely, if you fix the attachment of the wings to the spinal column you can assume that in flight the dragon will assume the attitude which brings the center of gravity below the wing attachment point. As for the muscles, they don't interfere; flight muscles attach most likely to the sternum, unlike limb muscles.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
Apr 6 at 17:44
$begingroup$
There is no way to answer this question where it would connect would depend entirely on how and where the limb evolved, what joints it has, and where the muscles are ect. flight musculature is not uniform in vertebrates. Birds and bats have a very different layout of flight muscles for instance. Since we don't know these things we can not give a definitive answer, there are many many correct answers. The only thing you can do is lay out the limbs so their range of movements do not meet each other.
$endgroup$
– John
Apr 6 at 21:33
$begingroup$
There is no way to answer this question where it would connect would depend entirely on how and where the limb evolved, what joints it has, and where the muscles are ect. flight musculature is not uniform in vertebrates. Birds and bats have a very different layout of flight muscles for instance. Since we don't know these things we can not give a definitive answer, there are many many correct answers. The only thing you can do is lay out the limbs so their range of movements do not meet each other.
$endgroup$
– John
Apr 6 at 21:33
$begingroup$
I can suggest you look at the art from, A Natural History of Dragons: A Memoir by Lady Trent, it has probably the most sound anatomy I have ever seen for dragons, with a minimum of interference between the limbs. This will show you at least one way it can be done.
$endgroup$
– John
Apr 6 at 21:38
$begingroup$
I can suggest you look at the art from, A Natural History of Dragons: A Memoir by Lady Trent, it has probably the most sound anatomy I have ever seen for dragons, with a minimum of interference between the limbs. This will show you at least one way it can be done.
$endgroup$
– John
Apr 6 at 21:38
$begingroup$
But do dragons really need large flight muscles? If they exist in a world with magic, then a reasonable explanation is that they evolved a natural flight magic that offsets their mass and lets their wings be much weaker than otherwise required. Same explanation for the firebreathing - human mages study to recreate the same fire spells that dragons know genetically.
$endgroup$
– Sir Adelaide
Apr 7 at 12:12
$begingroup$
But do dragons really need large flight muscles? If they exist in a world with magic, then a reasonable explanation is that they evolved a natural flight magic that offsets their mass and lets their wings be much weaker than otherwise required. Same explanation for the firebreathing - human mages study to recreate the same fire spells that dragons know genetically.
$endgroup$
– Sir Adelaide
Apr 7 at 12:12
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Im not an avian biologists so i do not know if this configuration would be biomechanically sound, however it may prove to be some help to you.
Credit to Christopher Stoll
Shown here is a break down of the skin, muscle and bone layers of Toothless from the How to Train Your Dragon series. This image clearly depicts how and where the bones connect and where the muscle attatches to the skeleton. As i mentioned, i am not an avian biologist so i do not know if this setup would actually be functional in the real world, you may very well be able to draw inspiration from this though.
Edit: As you specified for an image containing the pectoralis, i found another one that depicts it.
http://mythicalanimalscience.blogspot.com/2015/04/dragons.html
answered Apr 6 at 18:32
Liam MorrisLiam Morris
2,597432
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
@Mephistopheles Due to how it's positioned you cannot see it on the leg portion. It is hidden beneath what have to be the triceps as the attachment of the pectoralis is too high up. The weird "necktie" muscle is supposed to be the pectoralis major of the wings, but it's very small andhow it's positioned means it would move the front paws backwards and forwards with each wingbeat while losing some power. The second picture has the wingmuscles behind the front paws, which means the wings are farther behind and would have the dragon fly face downwards but it might work.
$endgroup$
– Demigan
Apr 6 at 19:59
1
$begingroup$
Regarding picture #2 Thank's you just solved (almost) all of my problems!
$endgroup$
– Mephistopheles
Apr 6 at 20:00
3
$begingroup$
@LiamMorris not an unsurmountable problem, but the artist of the drawing was so focused on the wings that he forgot to give the front paws proper joints. It can only move the paws straight forwards, and is very limited in it's motion. Again this isn't insurmountable. The artist also forgot to make the lower ribs stronger, as right now the sternum would be pulled into the abdomen and wreak havoc with the organs there with each wingbeat. an elongated ribcage would make the dragon walk very stiffly but allow it to fly without commiting seppuku.
$endgroup$
– Demigan
Apr 6 at 20:13
1
$begingroup$
Let us continue this discussion in chat.
$endgroup$
– Demigan
Apr 6 at 20:46
1
$begingroup$
considering the first image basically has no flight muscles, no it cannot be sound.
$endgroup$
– John
Apr 6 at 21:34
|
show 13 more comments
$begingroup$
The problem with wings is the necessary amount of power to lift the creature.
This is a bird skeleton:
Note the size of the sternum (the bone that all your ribs connect to). It's massive in comparison to ours and stands far out of the chest while a human sternum is basically flat in comparison. This sternum is what your pectoralis major muscles are attached to (the chest muscles).
The sheer size is because the muscles attached to it, shown here:
These absolutely humongous muscles are required to lift the weight of the entire creature up in the air, and the larger the bird the more % of the bird must be pectoralis major muscles just to keep it in the air due to the square cube law, but you can ignore this for the sake of cool. Despite this suspension of belief on the part of the square cube law you still want a bodyplan that can handle 4 paws and 2 wings simultaneously.
Note how these skeletons lack a large scapula. In the first picture you can see it mentioned but it's tiny and largely immobilized because everything is focused on that up/down movement of the arms, not about reaching forwards, backwards, upwards or downwards.
Having to have muscles attached to the chest for these extra appandages would diminish the amount of muscles for your wings. You could slightly circumvent this through kinematic chains.
An example of a kinematic chain is your quadriceps of your leg, or any other muscle that moves over more than 1 joint in the body. If you have muscles pull on one end of the bone they are attached to, you can use that to pull on the quadriceps, the quadriceps us that to pull on the muscle one joint removed, allowing you to transfer the muscle power from one bodypart to another. You attach a portion of the pectoralis major muscles to the dragon's leg, and have muscles above it attached to the wing (likely an adapted version of the triceps, romboideus, one part of the deloideus and trapezius). When flying the leg will be pulled down in the same motion as the wings and the muscles above that will simultaneously pull on the wings, allowing you to transfer the muscle power that went into the leg into the wing as well. This isn't wildly efficient and would likely make the leg flop up and down with the wingbeats, but it's an option. Ofcourse if you time it right and pull just as hard on the leg as on the wings, the leg would effectively keep still during flight. Although you'd be better off pulling it in as it would stretch the muscles above it and with that pull the wings.
answered Apr 6 at 20:08
DemiganDemigan
11.1k11053
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Although note in birds that swelling is the muscles to flap and the muscles to lift the limbs, birds layer thos muscles on top of each other.
$endgroup$
– John
Apr 6 at 21:30
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Split the forelimb.
Making a 6 limbed creature from a tetrapod body plan is tricky. WB stack is littered with efforts on this front. Here is a new idea.
First, comparative skeletal anatomy.
https://www.slideshare.net/OmerRasool1/comparative-anatomy-skeletal-system-71723331
Look at the whale. Now imagine splitting the distal forelimb into two limbs: one with the radius as core and the other with the ulna. The radius and associated digits (5 at baseline but you can add more digits; polydactyly is fine) becomes the robust wing, availing itself of the scapula and other support structures.
The ulna also has digits and is much less robust. It would not be a stocky limb to match the hindlimb but something more like a Tyrannosaurus. These small forelimbs would touch the ground and allow ambulation but for fast motion they are not the equal to the hind limbs.
Having powerful back legs, powerful wings and spindly forelimbs means these dragons would not look like Toothless or Smaug.
Running at speed would be bipedal. The dragon would rear up and run like a bird. Wings might be used while running for propulsion or to jump. Some people think this use is how birds evolved wings in the first place.
The small front limbs would lend themselves to more delicate manipulation. Dragons could sit up and have a smoke, or play cards.
Front limbs might move during flight because they retain a connection to the humerus. Probably it would be some sort of rhythmic movement mirroring the wings.
In general I think dragons are depicted as too robust. I picture this dragon as along the lines of a crane.
answered Apr 6 at 19:37
WillkWillk
119k28224496
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
What if I made the bone larger, but hollow, and used my graphene-magic on it?
$endgroup$
– Mephistopheles
Apr 6 at 19:45
$begingroup$
All the bones should be hollow to reduce weight, bird style. Hollow long bones should not be too troublesome - mammals have hollow bones too, but use the space for bone marrow. Your dragon can make blood in its spleen and have air inside its hollow bones.
$endgroup$
– Willk
Apr 6 at 20:08
$begingroup$
Your forelimb description made me think, Wasn't there a question awhile back asking how a dragon would go about knitting/sewing? Ha, there was!
$endgroup$
– EveryBitHelps
Apr 6 at 23:27
1
$begingroup$
One problem with this proposal is the lack of necessary musculature. In terrestrial vertebrates, both bones are operated by the same set of muscles. In your dragon, you'd have to add new muscles, as well as rework the elbow entirely because you want the radius and ulna to face opposite each other rather than parallel. I do like the idea though.
$endgroup$
– John Dvorak
Apr 7 at 12:08
$begingroup$
@Willk nice idea but you don't have to assume that the ulna isn't robust enough; sizing anything up or down is pretty easy for evolution, it's merely a question of how long the growth phase is allowed. Just look at the images you provided yourself for examples :-)
$endgroup$
– toolforger
Apr 7 at 16:39
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Any depiction by Larry Elmore should suffice. More like angles; their forelegs are actually arms, and the wings protrude from their back, beginning just below the shoulder blades.
Dragonlance's blue dragon, Skie, as pictured by Larry Elmore in the original cover art for, Dragons of Winter Night.
answered Apr 6 at 23:09
MazuraMazura
2,708914
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
It's a nice picture, and typical Fantasy depiction... but from an anatomy point of view it is plainly insufficient. Wings typically require a massive muscle to beat them (it has to lift the whole body, after all), and it's very unclear in your picture where said muscle would be. Actually, it looks like there's no such muscle and the wings are just aesthetic but non-functional.
$endgroup$
– Matthieu M.
Apr 7 at 9:24
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "579"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143396%2fdragon-forelimb-placement%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Im not an avian biologists so i do not know if this configuration would be biomechanically sound, however it may prove to be some help to you.
Credit to Christopher Stoll
Shown here is a break down of the skin, muscle and bone layers of Toothless from the How to Train Your Dragon series. This image clearly depicts how and where the bones connect and where the muscle attatches to the skeleton. As i mentioned, i am not an avian biologist so i do not know if this setup would actually be functional in the real world, you may very well be able to draw inspiration from this though.
Edit: As you specified for an image containing the pectoralis, i found another one that depicts it.
http://mythicalanimalscience.blogspot.com/2015/04/dragons.html
answered Apr 6 at 18:32
Liam MorrisLiam Morris
2,597432
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
@Mephistopheles Due to how it's positioned you cannot see it on the leg portion. It is hidden beneath what have to be the triceps as the attachment of the pectoralis is too high up. The weird "necktie" muscle is supposed to be the pectoralis major of the wings, but it's very small andhow it's positioned means it would move the front paws backwards and forwards with each wingbeat while losing some power. The second picture has the wingmuscles behind the front paws, which means the wings are farther behind and would have the dragon fly face downwards but it might work.
$endgroup$
– Demigan
Apr 6 at 19:59
1
$begingroup$
Regarding picture #2 Thank's you just solved (almost) all of my problems!
$endgroup$
– Mephistopheles
Apr 6 at 20:00
3
$begingroup$
@LiamMorris not an unsurmountable problem, but the artist of the drawing was so focused on the wings that he forgot to give the front paws proper joints. It can only move the paws straight forwards, and is very limited in it's motion. Again this isn't insurmountable. The artist also forgot to make the lower ribs stronger, as right now the sternum would be pulled into the abdomen and wreak havoc with the organs there with each wingbeat. an elongated ribcage would make the dragon walk very stiffly but allow it to fly without commiting seppuku.
$endgroup$
– Demigan
Apr 6 at 20:13
1
$begingroup$
Let us continue this discussion in chat.
$endgroup$
– Demigan
Apr 6 at 20:46
1
$begingroup$
considering the first image basically has no flight muscles, no it cannot be sound.
$endgroup$
– John
Apr 6 at 21:34
|
show 13 more comments
$begingroup$
Im not an avian biologists so i do not know if this configuration would be biomechanically sound, however it may prove to be some help to you.
Credit to Christopher Stoll
Shown here is a break down of the skin, muscle and bone layers of Toothless from the How to Train Your Dragon series. This image clearly depicts how and where the bones connect and where the muscle attatches to the skeleton. As i mentioned, i am not an avian biologist so i do not know if this setup would actually be functional in the real world, you may very well be able to draw inspiration from this though.
Edit: As you specified for an image containing the pectoralis, i found another one that depicts it.
http://mythicalanimalscience.blogspot.com/2015/04/dragons.html
answered Apr 6 at 18:32
Liam MorrisLiam Morris
2,597432
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
@Mephistopheles Due to how it's positioned you cannot see it on the leg portion. It is hidden beneath what have to be the triceps as the attachment of the pectoralis is too high up. The weird "necktie" muscle is supposed to be the pectoralis major of the wings, but it's very small andhow it's positioned means it would move the front paws backwards and forwards with each wingbeat while losing some power. The second picture has the wingmuscles behind the front paws, which means the wings are farther behind and would have the dragon fly face downwards but it might work.
$endgroup$
– Demigan
Apr 6 at 19:59
1
$begingroup$
Regarding picture #2 Thank's you just solved (almost) all of my problems!
$endgroup$
– Mephistopheles
Apr 6 at 20:00
3
$begingroup$
@LiamMorris not an unsurmountable problem, but the artist of the drawing was so focused on the wings that he forgot to give the front paws proper joints. It can only move the paws straight forwards, and is very limited in it's motion. Again this isn't insurmountable. The artist also forgot to make the lower ribs stronger, as right now the sternum would be pulled into the abdomen and wreak havoc with the organs there with each wingbeat. an elongated ribcage would make the dragon walk very stiffly but allow it to fly without commiting seppuku.
$endgroup$
– Demigan
Apr 6 at 20:13
1
$begingroup$
Let us continue this discussion in chat.
$endgroup$
– Demigan
Apr 6 at 20:46
1
$begingroup$
considering the first image basically has no flight muscles, no it cannot be sound.
$endgroup$
– John
Apr 6 at 21:34
|
show 13 more comments
$begingroup$
Im not an avian biologists so i do not know if this configuration would be biomechanically sound, however it may prove to be some help to you.
Credit to Christopher Stoll
Shown here is a break down of the skin, muscle and bone layers of Toothless from the How to Train Your Dragon series. This image clearly depicts how and where the bones connect and where the muscle attatches to the skeleton. As i mentioned, i am not an avian biologist so i do not know if this setup would actually be functional in the real world, you may very well be able to draw inspiration from this though.
Edit: As you specified for an image containing the pectoralis, i found another one that depicts it.
http://mythicalanimalscience.blogspot.com/2015/04/dragons.html
answered Apr 6 at 18:32
Liam MorrisLiam Morris
2,597432
$endgroup$
Im not an avian biologists so i do not know if this configuration would be biomechanically sound, however it may prove to be some help to you.
Credit to Christopher Stoll
Shown here is a break down of the skin, muscle and bone layers of Toothless from the How to Train Your Dragon series. This image clearly depicts how and where the bones connect and where the muscle attatches to the skeleton. As i mentioned, i am not an avian biologist so i do not know if this setup would actually be functional in the real world, you may very well be able to draw inspiration from this though.
Edit: As you specified for an image containing the pectoralis, i found another one that depicts it.
http://mythicalanimalscience.blogspot.com/2015/04/dragons.html
answered Apr 6 at 18:32
Liam MorrisLiam Morris
2,597432
edited Apr 6 at 20:01
answered Apr 6 at 18:32
Liam MorrisLiam Morris
2,597432
answered Apr 6 at 18:32
Liam MorrisLiam Morris
2,597432
answered Apr 6 at 18:32
Liam MorrisLiam Morris
2,597432
2,597432
2
$begingroup$
@Mephistopheles Due to how it's positioned you cannot see it on the leg portion. It is hidden beneath what have to be the triceps as the attachment of the pectoralis is too high up. The weird "necktie" muscle is supposed to be the pectoralis major of the wings, but it's very small andhow it's positioned means it would move the front paws backwards and forwards with each wingbeat while losing some power. The second picture has the wingmuscles behind the front paws, which means the wings are farther behind and would have the dragon fly face downwards but it might work.
$endgroup$
– Demigan
Apr 6 at 19:59
1
$begingroup$
Regarding picture #2 Thank's you just solved (almost) all of my problems!
$endgroup$
– Mephistopheles
Apr 6 at 20:00
3
$begingroup$
@LiamMorris not an unsurmountable problem, but the artist of the drawing was so focused on the wings that he forgot to give the front paws proper joints. It can only move the paws straight forwards, and is very limited in it's motion. Again this isn't insurmountable. The artist also forgot to make the lower ribs stronger, as right now the sternum would be pulled into the abdomen and wreak havoc with the organs there with each wingbeat. an elongated ribcage would make the dragon walk very stiffly but allow it to fly without commiting seppuku.
$endgroup$
– Demigan
Apr 6 at 20:13
1
$begingroup$
Let us continue this discussion in chat.
$endgroup$
– Demigan
Apr 6 at 20:46
1
$begingroup$
considering the first image basically has no flight muscles, no it cannot be sound.
$endgroup$
– John
Apr 6 at 21:34
|
show 13 more comments
2
$begingroup$
@Mephistopheles Due to how it's positioned you cannot see it on the leg portion. It is hidden beneath what have to be the triceps as the attachment of the pectoralis is too high up. The weird "necktie" muscle is supposed to be the pectoralis major of the wings, but it's very small andhow it's positioned means it would move the front paws backwards and forwards with each wingbeat while losing some power. The second picture has the wingmuscles behind the front paws, which means the wings are farther behind and would have the dragon fly face downwards but it might work.
$endgroup$
– Demigan
Apr 6 at 19:59
1
$begingroup$
Regarding picture #2 Thank's you just solved (almost) all of my problems!
$endgroup$
– Mephistopheles
Apr 6 at 20:00
3
$begingroup$
@LiamMorris not an unsurmountable problem, but the artist of the drawing was so focused on the wings that he forgot to give the front paws proper joints. It can only move the paws straight forwards, and is very limited in it's motion. Again this isn't insurmountable. The artist also forgot to make the lower ribs stronger, as right now the sternum would be pulled into the abdomen and wreak havoc with the organs there with each wingbeat. an elongated ribcage would make the dragon walk very stiffly but allow it to fly without commiting seppuku.
$endgroup$
– Demigan
Apr 6 at 20:13
1
$begingroup$
Let us continue this discussion in chat.
$endgroup$
– Demigan
Apr 6 at 20:46
1
$begingroup$
considering the first image basically has no flight muscles, no it cannot be sound.
$endgroup$
– John
Apr 6 at 21:34
2
2
$begingroup$
@Mephistopheles Due to how it's positioned you cannot see it on the leg portion. It is hidden beneath what have to be the triceps as the attachment of the pectoralis is too high up. The weird "necktie" muscle is supposed to be the pectoralis major of the wings, but it's very small andhow it's positioned means it would move the front paws backwards and forwards with each wingbeat while losing some power. The second picture has the wingmuscles behind the front paws, which means the wings are farther behind and would have the dragon fly face downwards but it might work.
$endgroup$
– Demigan
Apr 6 at 19:59
$begingroup$
@Mephistopheles Due to how it's positioned you cannot see it on the leg portion. It is hidden beneath what have to be the triceps as the attachment of the pectoralis is too high up. The weird "necktie" muscle is supposed to be the pectoralis major of the wings, but it's very small andhow it's positioned means it would move the front paws backwards and forwards with each wingbeat while losing some power. The second picture has the wingmuscles behind the front paws, which means the wings are farther behind and would have the dragon fly face downwards but it might work.
$endgroup$
– Demigan
Apr 6 at 19:59
1
1
$begingroup$
Regarding picture #2 Thank's you just solved (almost) all of my problems!
$endgroup$
– Mephistopheles
Apr 6 at 20:00
$begingroup$
Regarding picture #2 Thank's you just solved (almost) all of my problems!
$endgroup$
– Mephistopheles
Apr 6 at 20:00
3
3
$begingroup$
@LiamMorris not an unsurmountable problem, but the artist of the drawing was so focused on the wings that he forgot to give the front paws proper joints. It can only move the paws straight forwards, and is very limited in it's motion. Again this isn't insurmountable. The artist also forgot to make the lower ribs stronger, as right now the sternum would be pulled into the abdomen and wreak havoc with the organs there with each wingbeat. an elongated ribcage would make the dragon walk very stiffly but allow it to fly without commiting seppuku.
$endgroup$
– Demigan
Apr 6 at 20:13
$begingroup$
@LiamMorris not an unsurmountable problem, but the artist of the drawing was so focused on the wings that he forgot to give the front paws proper joints. It can only move the paws straight forwards, and is very limited in it's motion. Again this isn't insurmountable. The artist also forgot to make the lower ribs stronger, as right now the sternum would be pulled into the abdomen and wreak havoc with the organs there with each wingbeat. an elongated ribcage would make the dragon walk very stiffly but allow it to fly without commiting seppuku.
$endgroup$
– Demigan
Apr 6 at 20:13
1
1
$begingroup$
Let us continue this discussion in chat.
$endgroup$
– Demigan
Apr 6 at 20:46
$begingroup$
Let us continue this discussion in chat.
$endgroup$
– Demigan
Apr 6 at 20:46
1
1
$begingroup$
considering the first image basically has no flight muscles, no it cannot be sound.
$endgroup$
– John
Apr 6 at 21:34
$begingroup$
considering the first image basically has no flight muscles, no it cannot be sound.
$endgroup$
– John
Apr 6 at 21:34
|
show 13 more comments
$begingroup$
The problem with wings is the necessary amount of power to lift the creature.
This is a bird skeleton:
Note the size of the sternum (the bone that all your ribs connect to). It's massive in comparison to ours and stands far out of the chest while a human sternum is basically flat in comparison. This sternum is what your pectoralis major muscles are attached to (the chest muscles).
The sheer size is because the muscles attached to it, shown here:
These absolutely humongous muscles are required to lift the weight of the entire creature up in the air, and the larger the bird the more % of the bird must be pectoralis major muscles just to keep it in the air due to the square cube law, but you can ignore this for the sake of cool. Despite this suspension of belief on the part of the square cube law you still want a bodyplan that can handle 4 paws and 2 wings simultaneously.
Note how these skeletons lack a large scapula. In the first picture you can see it mentioned but it's tiny and largely immobilized because everything is focused on that up/down movement of the arms, not about reaching forwards, backwards, upwards or downwards.
Having to have muscles attached to the chest for these extra appandages would diminish the amount of muscles for your wings. You could slightly circumvent this through kinematic chains.
An example of a kinematic chain is your quadriceps of your leg, or any other muscle that moves over more than 1 joint in the body. If you have muscles pull on one end of the bone they are attached to, you can use that to pull on the quadriceps, the quadriceps us that to pull on the muscle one joint removed, allowing you to transfer the muscle power from one bodypart to another. You attach a portion of the pectoralis major muscles to the dragon's leg, and have muscles above it attached to the wing (likely an adapted version of the triceps, romboideus, one part of the deloideus and trapezius). When flying the leg will be pulled down in the same motion as the wings and the muscles above that will simultaneously pull on the wings, allowing you to transfer the muscle power that went into the leg into the wing as well. This isn't wildly efficient and would likely make the leg flop up and down with the wingbeats, but it's an option. Ofcourse if you time it right and pull just as hard on the leg as on the wings, the leg would effectively keep still during flight. Although you'd be better off pulling it in as it would stretch the muscles above it and with that pull the wings.
answered Apr 6 at 20:08
DemiganDemigan
11.1k11053
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Although note in birds that swelling is the muscles to flap and the muscles to lift the limbs, birds layer thos muscles on top of each other.
$endgroup$
– John
Apr 6 at 21:30
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The problem with wings is the necessary amount of power to lift the creature.
This is a bird skeleton:
Note the size of the sternum (the bone that all your ribs connect to). It's massive in comparison to ours and stands far out of the chest while a human sternum is basically flat in comparison. This sternum is what your pectoralis major muscles are attached to (the chest muscles).
The sheer size is because the muscles attached to it, shown here:
These absolutely humongous muscles are required to lift the weight of the entire creature up in the air, and the larger the bird the more % of the bird must be pectoralis major muscles just to keep it in the air due to the square cube law, but you can ignore this for the sake of cool. Despite this suspension of belief on the part of the square cube law you still want a bodyplan that can handle 4 paws and 2 wings simultaneously.
Note how these skeletons lack a large scapula. In the first picture you can see it mentioned but it's tiny and largely immobilized because everything is focused on that up/down movement of the arms, not about reaching forwards, backwards, upwards or downwards.
Having to have muscles attached to the chest for these extra appandages would diminish the amount of muscles for your wings. You could slightly circumvent this through kinematic chains.
An example of a kinematic chain is your quadriceps of your leg, or any other muscle that moves over more than 1 joint in the body. If you have muscles pull on one end of the bone they are attached to, you can use that to pull on the quadriceps, the quadriceps us that to pull on the muscle one joint removed, allowing you to transfer the muscle power from one bodypart to another. You attach a portion of the pectoralis major muscles to the dragon's leg, and have muscles above it attached to the wing (likely an adapted version of the triceps, romboideus, one part of the deloideus and trapezius). When flying the leg will be pulled down in the same motion as the wings and the muscles above that will simultaneously pull on the wings, allowing you to transfer the muscle power that went into the leg into the wing as well. This isn't wildly efficient and would likely make the leg flop up and down with the wingbeats, but it's an option. Ofcourse if you time it right and pull just as hard on the leg as on the wings, the leg would effectively keep still during flight. Although you'd be better off pulling it in as it would stretch the muscles above it and with that pull the wings.
answered Apr 6 at 20:08
DemiganDemigan
11.1k11053
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Although note in birds that swelling is the muscles to flap and the muscles to lift the limbs, birds layer thos muscles on top of each other.
$endgroup$
– John
Apr 6 at 21:30
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The problem with wings is the necessary amount of power to lift the creature.
This is a bird skeleton:
Note the size of the sternum (the bone that all your ribs connect to). It's massive in comparison to ours and stands far out of the chest while a human sternum is basically flat in comparison. This sternum is what your pectoralis major muscles are attached to (the chest muscles).
The sheer size is because the muscles attached to it, shown here:
These absolutely humongous muscles are required to lift the weight of the entire creature up in the air, and the larger the bird the more % of the bird must be pectoralis major muscles just to keep it in the air due to the square cube law, but you can ignore this for the sake of cool. Despite this suspension of belief on the part of the square cube law you still want a bodyplan that can handle 4 paws and 2 wings simultaneously.
Note how these skeletons lack a large scapula. In the first picture you can see it mentioned but it's tiny and largely immobilized because everything is focused on that up/down movement of the arms, not about reaching forwards, backwards, upwards or downwards.
Having to have muscles attached to the chest for these extra appandages would diminish the amount of muscles for your wings. You could slightly circumvent this through kinematic chains.
An example of a kinematic chain is your quadriceps of your leg, or any other muscle that moves over more than 1 joint in the body. If you have muscles pull on one end of the bone they are attached to, you can use that to pull on the quadriceps, the quadriceps us that to pull on the muscle one joint removed, allowing you to transfer the muscle power from one bodypart to another. You attach a portion of the pectoralis major muscles to the dragon's leg, and have muscles above it attached to the wing (likely an adapted version of the triceps, romboideus, one part of the deloideus and trapezius). When flying the leg will be pulled down in the same motion as the wings and the muscles above that will simultaneously pull on the wings, allowing you to transfer the muscle power that went into the leg into the wing as well. This isn't wildly efficient and would likely make the leg flop up and down with the wingbeats, but it's an option. Ofcourse if you time it right and pull just as hard on the leg as on the wings, the leg would effectively keep still during flight. Although you'd be better off pulling it in as it would stretch the muscles above it and with that pull the wings.
answered Apr 6 at 20:08
DemiganDemigan
11.1k11053
$endgroup$
The problem with wings is the necessary amount of power to lift the creature.
This is a bird skeleton:
Note the size of the sternum (the bone that all your ribs connect to). It's massive in comparison to ours and stands far out of the chest while a human sternum is basically flat in comparison. This sternum is what your pectoralis major muscles are attached to (the chest muscles).
The sheer size is because the muscles attached to it, shown here:
These absolutely humongous muscles are required to lift the weight of the entire creature up in the air, and the larger the bird the more % of the bird must be pectoralis major muscles just to keep it in the air due to the square cube law, but you can ignore this for the sake of cool. Despite this suspension of belief on the part of the square cube law you still want a bodyplan that can handle 4 paws and 2 wings simultaneously.
Note how these skeletons lack a large scapula. In the first picture you can see it mentioned but it's tiny and largely immobilized because everything is focused on that up/down movement of the arms, not about reaching forwards, backwards, upwards or downwards.
Having to have muscles attached to the chest for these extra appandages would diminish the amount of muscles for your wings. You could slightly circumvent this through kinematic chains.
An example of a kinematic chain is your quadriceps of your leg, or any other muscle that moves over more than 1 joint in the body. If you have muscles pull on one end of the bone they are attached to, you can use that to pull on the quadriceps, the quadriceps us that to pull on the muscle one joint removed, allowing you to transfer the muscle power from one bodypart to another. You attach a portion of the pectoralis major muscles to the dragon's leg, and have muscles above it attached to the wing (likely an adapted version of the triceps, romboideus, one part of the deloideus and trapezius). When flying the leg will be pulled down in the same motion as the wings and the muscles above that will simultaneously pull on the wings, allowing you to transfer the muscle power that went into the leg into the wing as well. This isn't wildly efficient and would likely make the leg flop up and down with the wingbeats, but it's an option. Ofcourse if you time it right and pull just as hard on the leg as on the wings, the leg would effectively keep still during flight. Although you'd be better off pulling it in as it would stretch the muscles above it and with that pull the wings.
answered Apr 6 at 20:08
DemiganDemigan
11.1k11053
answered Apr 6 at 20:08
DemiganDemigan
11.1k11053
answered Apr 6 at 20:08
DemiganDemigan
11.1k11053
answered Apr 6 at 20:08
DemiganDemigan
11.1k11053
11.1k11053
$begingroup$
Although note in birds that swelling is the muscles to flap and the muscles to lift the limbs, birds layer thos muscles on top of each other.
$endgroup$
– John
Apr 6 at 21:30
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Although note in birds that swelling is the muscles to flap and the muscles to lift the limbs, birds layer thos muscles on top of each other.
$endgroup$
– John
Apr 6 at 21:30
$begingroup$
Although note in birds that swelling is the muscles to flap and the muscles to lift the limbs, birds layer thos muscles on top of each other.
$endgroup$
– John
Apr 6 at 21:30
$begingroup$
Although note in birds that swelling is the muscles to flap and the muscles to lift the limbs, birds layer thos muscles on top of each other.
$endgroup$
– John
Apr 6 at 21:30
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Split the forelimb.
Making a 6 limbed creature from a tetrapod body plan is tricky. WB stack is littered with efforts on this front. Here is a new idea.
First, comparative skeletal anatomy.
https://www.slideshare.net/OmerRasool1/comparative-anatomy-skeletal-system-71723331
Look at the whale. Now imagine splitting the distal forelimb into two limbs: one with the radius as core and the other with the ulna. The radius and associated digits (5 at baseline but you can add more digits; polydactyly is fine) becomes the robust wing, availing itself of the scapula and other support structures.
The ulna also has digits and is much less robust. It would not be a stocky limb to match the hindlimb but something more like a Tyrannosaurus. These small forelimbs would touch the ground and allow ambulation but for fast motion they are not the equal to the hind limbs.
Having powerful back legs, powerful wings and spindly forelimbs means these dragons would not look like Toothless or Smaug.
Running at speed would be bipedal. The dragon would rear up and run like a bird. Wings might be used while running for propulsion or to jump. Some people think this use is how birds evolved wings in the first place.
The small front limbs would lend themselves to more delicate manipulation. Dragons could sit up and have a smoke, or play cards.
Front limbs might move during flight because they retain a connection to the humerus. Probably it would be some sort of rhythmic movement mirroring the wings.
In general I think dragons are depicted as too robust. I picture this dragon as along the lines of a crane.
answered Apr 6 at 19:37
WillkWillk
119k28224496
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
What if I made the bone larger, but hollow, and used my graphene-magic on it?
$endgroup$
– Mephistopheles
Apr 6 at 19:45
$begingroup$
All the bones should be hollow to reduce weight, bird style. Hollow long bones should not be too troublesome - mammals have hollow bones too, but use the space for bone marrow. Your dragon can make blood in its spleen and have air inside its hollow bones.
$endgroup$
– Willk
Apr 6 at 20:08
$begingroup$
Your forelimb description made me think, Wasn't there a question awhile back asking how a dragon would go about knitting/sewing? Ha, there was!
$endgroup$
– EveryBitHelps
Apr 6 at 23:27
1
$begingroup$
One problem with this proposal is the lack of necessary musculature. In terrestrial vertebrates, both bones are operated by the same set of muscles. In your dragon, you'd have to add new muscles, as well as rework the elbow entirely because you want the radius and ulna to face opposite each other rather than parallel. I do like the idea though.
$endgroup$
– John Dvorak
Apr 7 at 12:08
$begingroup$
@Willk nice idea but you don't have to assume that the ulna isn't robust enough; sizing anything up or down is pretty easy for evolution, it's merely a question of how long the growth phase is allowed. Just look at the images you provided yourself for examples :-)
$endgroup$
– toolforger
Apr 7 at 16:39
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Split the forelimb.
Making a 6 limbed creature from a tetrapod body plan is tricky. WB stack is littered with efforts on this front. Here is a new idea.
First, comparative skeletal anatomy.
https://www.slideshare.net/OmerRasool1/comparative-anatomy-skeletal-system-71723331
Look at the whale. Now imagine splitting the distal forelimb into two limbs: one with the radius as core and the other with the ulna. The radius and associated digits (5 at baseline but you can add more digits; polydactyly is fine) becomes the robust wing, availing itself of the scapula and other support structures.
The ulna also has digits and is much less robust. It would not be a stocky limb to match the hindlimb but something more like a Tyrannosaurus. These small forelimbs would touch the ground and allow ambulation but for fast motion they are not the equal to the hind limbs.
Having powerful back legs, powerful wings and spindly forelimbs means these dragons would not look like Toothless or Smaug.
Running at speed would be bipedal. The dragon would rear up and run like a bird. Wings might be used while running for propulsion or to jump. Some people think this use is how birds evolved wings in the first place.
The small front limbs would lend themselves to more delicate manipulation. Dragons could sit up and have a smoke, or play cards.
Front limbs might move during flight because they retain a connection to the humerus. Probably it would be some sort of rhythmic movement mirroring the wings.
In general I think dragons are depicted as too robust. I picture this dragon as along the lines of a crane.
answered Apr 6 at 19:37
WillkWillk
119k28224496
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
What if I made the bone larger, but hollow, and used my graphene-magic on it?
$endgroup$
– Mephistopheles
Apr 6 at 19:45
$begingroup$
All the bones should be hollow to reduce weight, bird style. Hollow long bones should not be too troublesome - mammals have hollow bones too, but use the space for bone marrow. Your dragon can make blood in its spleen and have air inside its hollow bones.
$endgroup$
– Willk
Apr 6 at 20:08
$begingroup$
Your forelimb description made me think, Wasn't there a question awhile back asking how a dragon would go about knitting/sewing? Ha, there was!
$endgroup$
– EveryBitHelps
Apr 6 at 23:27
1
$begingroup$
One problem with this proposal is the lack of necessary musculature. In terrestrial vertebrates, both bones are operated by the same set of muscles. In your dragon, you'd have to add new muscles, as well as rework the elbow entirely because you want the radius and ulna to face opposite each other rather than parallel. I do like the idea though.
$endgroup$
– John Dvorak
Apr 7 at 12:08
$begingroup$
@Willk nice idea but you don't have to assume that the ulna isn't robust enough; sizing anything up or down is pretty easy for evolution, it's merely a question of how long the growth phase is allowed. Just look at the images you provided yourself for examples :-)
$endgroup$
– toolforger
Apr 7 at 16:39
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Split the forelimb.
Making a 6 limbed creature from a tetrapod body plan is tricky. WB stack is littered with efforts on this front. Here is a new idea.
First, comparative skeletal anatomy.
https://www.slideshare.net/OmerRasool1/comparative-anatomy-skeletal-system-71723331
Look at the whale. Now imagine splitting the distal forelimb into two limbs: one with the radius as core and the other with the ulna. The radius and associated digits (5 at baseline but you can add more digits; polydactyly is fine) becomes the robust wing, availing itself of the scapula and other support structures.
The ulna also has digits and is much less robust. It would not be a stocky limb to match the hindlimb but something more like a Tyrannosaurus. These small forelimbs would touch the ground and allow ambulation but for fast motion they are not the equal to the hind limbs.
Having powerful back legs, powerful wings and spindly forelimbs means these dragons would not look like Toothless or Smaug.
Running at speed would be bipedal. The dragon would rear up and run like a bird. Wings might be used while running for propulsion or to jump. Some people think this use is how birds evolved wings in the first place.
The small front limbs would lend themselves to more delicate manipulation. Dragons could sit up and have a smoke, or play cards.
Front limbs might move during flight because they retain a connection to the humerus. Probably it would be some sort of rhythmic movement mirroring the wings.
In general I think dragons are depicted as too robust. I picture this dragon as along the lines of a crane.
answered Apr 6 at 19:37
WillkWillk
119k28224496
$endgroup$
Split the forelimb.
Making a 6 limbed creature from a tetrapod body plan is tricky. WB stack is littered with efforts on this front. Here is a new idea.
First, comparative skeletal anatomy.
https://www.slideshare.net/OmerRasool1/comparative-anatomy-skeletal-system-71723331
Look at the whale. Now imagine splitting the distal forelimb into two limbs: one with the radius as core and the other with the ulna. The radius and associated digits (5 at baseline but you can add more digits; polydactyly is fine) becomes the robust wing, availing itself of the scapula and other support structures.
The ulna also has digits and is much less robust. It would not be a stocky limb to match the hindlimb but something more like a Tyrannosaurus. These small forelimbs would touch the ground and allow ambulation but for fast motion they are not the equal to the hind limbs.
Having powerful back legs, powerful wings and spindly forelimbs means these dragons would not look like Toothless or Smaug.
Running at speed would be bipedal. The dragon would rear up and run like a bird. Wings might be used while running for propulsion or to jump. Some people think this use is how birds evolved wings in the first place.
The small front limbs would lend themselves to more delicate manipulation. Dragons could sit up and have a smoke, or play cards.
Front limbs might move during flight because they retain a connection to the humerus. Probably it would be some sort of rhythmic movement mirroring the wings.
In general I think dragons are depicted as too robust. I picture this dragon as along the lines of a crane.
answered Apr 6 at 19:37
WillkWillk
119k28224496
answered Apr 6 at 19:37
WillkWillk
119k28224496
answered Apr 6 at 19:37
WillkWillk
119k28224496
answered Apr 6 at 19:37
WillkWillk
119k28224496
119k28224496
$begingroup$
What if I made the bone larger, but hollow, and used my graphene-magic on it?
$endgroup$
– Mephistopheles
Apr 6 at 19:45
$begingroup$
All the bones should be hollow to reduce weight, bird style. Hollow long bones should not be too troublesome - mammals have hollow bones too, but use the space for bone marrow. Your dragon can make blood in its spleen and have air inside its hollow bones.
$endgroup$
– Willk
Apr 6 at 20:08
$begingroup$
Your forelimb description made me think, Wasn't there a question awhile back asking how a dragon would go about knitting/sewing? Ha, there was!
$endgroup$
– EveryBitHelps
Apr 6 at 23:27
1
$begingroup$
One problem with this proposal is the lack of necessary musculature. In terrestrial vertebrates, both bones are operated by the same set of muscles. In your dragon, you'd have to add new muscles, as well as rework the elbow entirely because you want the radius and ulna to face opposite each other rather than parallel. I do like the idea though.
$endgroup$
– John Dvorak
Apr 7 at 12:08
$begingroup$
@Willk nice idea but you don't have to assume that the ulna isn't robust enough; sizing anything up or down is pretty easy for evolution, it's merely a question of how long the growth phase is allowed. Just look at the images you provided yourself for examples :-)
$endgroup$
– toolforger
Apr 7 at 16:39
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What if I made the bone larger, but hollow, and used my graphene-magic on it?
$endgroup$
– Mephistopheles
Apr 6 at 19:45
$begingroup$
All the bones should be hollow to reduce weight, bird style. Hollow long bones should not be too troublesome - mammals have hollow bones too, but use the space for bone marrow. Your dragon can make blood in its spleen and have air inside its hollow bones.
$endgroup$
– Willk
Apr 6 at 20:08
$begingroup$
Your forelimb description made me think, Wasn't there a question awhile back asking how a dragon would go about knitting/sewing? Ha, there was!
$endgroup$
– EveryBitHelps
Apr 6 at 23:27
1
$begingroup$
One problem with this proposal is the lack of necessary musculature. In terrestrial vertebrates, both bones are operated by the same set of muscles. In your dragon, you'd have to add new muscles, as well as rework the elbow entirely because you want the radius and ulna to face opposite each other rather than parallel. I do like the idea though.
$endgroup$
– John Dvorak
Apr 7 at 12:08
$begingroup$
@Willk nice idea but you don't have to assume that the ulna isn't robust enough; sizing anything up or down is pretty easy for evolution, it's merely a question of how long the growth phase is allowed. Just look at the images you provided yourself for examples :-)
$endgroup$
– toolforger
Apr 7 at 16:39
$begingroup$
What if I made the bone larger, but hollow, and used my graphene-magic on it?
$endgroup$
– Mephistopheles
Apr 6 at 19:45
$begingroup$
What if I made the bone larger, but hollow, and used my graphene-magic on it?
$endgroup$
– Mephistopheles
Apr 6 at 19:45
$begingroup$
All the bones should be hollow to reduce weight, bird style. Hollow long bones should not be too troublesome - mammals have hollow bones too, but use the space for bone marrow. Your dragon can make blood in its spleen and have air inside its hollow bones.
$endgroup$
– Willk
Apr 6 at 20:08
$begingroup$
All the bones should be hollow to reduce weight, bird style. Hollow long bones should not be too troublesome - mammals have hollow bones too, but use the space for bone marrow. Your dragon can make blood in its spleen and have air inside its hollow bones.
$endgroup$
– Willk
Apr 6 at 20:08
$begingroup$
Your forelimb description made me think, Wasn't there a question awhile back asking how a dragon would go about knitting/sewing? Ha, there was!
$endgroup$
– EveryBitHelps
Apr 6 at 23:27
$begingroup$
Your forelimb description made me think, Wasn't there a question awhile back asking how a dragon would go about knitting/sewing? Ha, there was!
$endgroup$
– EveryBitHelps
Apr 6 at 23:27
1
1
$begingroup$
One problem with this proposal is the lack of necessary musculature. In terrestrial vertebrates, both bones are operated by the same set of muscles. In your dragon, you'd have to add new muscles, as well as rework the elbow entirely because you want the radius and ulna to face opposite each other rather than parallel. I do like the idea though.
$endgroup$
– John Dvorak
Apr 7 at 12:08
$begingroup$
One problem with this proposal is the lack of necessary musculature. In terrestrial vertebrates, both bones are operated by the same set of muscles. In your dragon, you'd have to add new muscles, as well as rework the elbow entirely because you want the radius and ulna to face opposite each other rather than parallel. I do like the idea though.
$endgroup$
– John Dvorak
Apr 7 at 12:08
$begingroup$
@Willk nice idea but you don't have to assume that the ulna isn't robust enough; sizing anything up or down is pretty easy for evolution, it's merely a question of how long the growth phase is allowed. Just look at the images you provided yourself for examples :-)
$endgroup$
– toolforger
Apr 7 at 16:39
$begingroup$
@Willk nice idea but you don't have to assume that the ulna isn't robust enough; sizing anything up or down is pretty easy for evolution, it's merely a question of how long the growth phase is allowed. Just look at the images you provided yourself for examples :-)
$endgroup$
– toolforger
Apr 7 at 16:39
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Any depiction by Larry Elmore should suffice. More like angles; their forelegs are actually arms, and the wings protrude from their back, beginning just below the shoulder blades.
Dragonlance's blue dragon, Skie, as pictured by Larry Elmore in the original cover art for, Dragons of Winter Night.
answered Apr 6 at 23:09
MazuraMazura
2,708914
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
It's a nice picture, and typical Fantasy depiction... but from an anatomy point of view it is plainly insufficient. Wings typically require a massive muscle to beat them (it has to lift the whole body, after all), and it's very unclear in your picture where said muscle would be. Actually, it looks like there's no such muscle and the wings are just aesthetic but non-functional.
$endgroup$
– Matthieu M.
Apr 7 at 9:24
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Any depiction by Larry Elmore should suffice. More like angles; their forelegs are actually arms, and the wings protrude from their back, beginning just below the shoulder blades.
Dragonlance's blue dragon, Skie, as pictured by Larry Elmore in the original cover art for, Dragons of Winter Night.
answered Apr 6 at 23:09
MazuraMazura
2,708914
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
It's a nice picture, and typical Fantasy depiction... but from an anatomy point of view it is plainly insufficient. Wings typically require a massive muscle to beat them (it has to lift the whole body, after all), and it's very unclear in your picture where said muscle would be. Actually, it looks like there's no such muscle and the wings are just aesthetic but non-functional.
$endgroup$
– Matthieu M.
Apr 7 at 9:24
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Any depiction by Larry Elmore should suffice. More like angles; their forelegs are actually arms, and the wings protrude from their back, beginning just below the shoulder blades.
Dragonlance's blue dragon, Skie, as pictured by Larry Elmore in the original cover art for, Dragons of Winter Night.
answered Apr 6 at 23:09
MazuraMazura
2,708914
$endgroup$
Any depiction by Larry Elmore should suffice. More like angles; their forelegs are actually arms, and the wings protrude from their back, beginning just below the shoulder blades.
Dragonlance's blue dragon, Skie, as pictured by Larry Elmore in the original cover art for, Dragons of Winter Night.
answered Apr 6 at 23:09
MazuraMazura
2,708914
answered Apr 6 at 23:09
MazuraMazura
2,708914
answered Apr 6 at 23:09
MazuraMazura
2,708914
answered Apr 6 at 23:09
MazuraMazura
2,708914
2,708914
$begingroup$
It's a nice picture, and typical Fantasy depiction... but from an anatomy point of view it is plainly insufficient. Wings typically require a massive muscle to beat them (it has to lift the whole body, after all), and it's very unclear in your picture where said muscle would be. Actually, it looks like there's no such muscle and the wings are just aesthetic but non-functional.
$endgroup$
– Matthieu M.
Apr 7 at 9:24
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's a nice picture, and typical Fantasy depiction... but from an anatomy point of view it is plainly insufficient. Wings typically require a massive muscle to beat them (it has to lift the whole body, after all), and it's very unclear in your picture where said muscle would be. Actually, it looks like there's no such muscle and the wings are just aesthetic but non-functional.
$endgroup$
– Matthieu M.
Apr 7 at 9:24
$begingroup$
It's a nice picture, and typical Fantasy depiction... but from an anatomy point of view it is plainly insufficient. Wings typically require a massive muscle to beat them (it has to lift the whole body, after all), and it's very unclear in your picture where said muscle would be. Actually, it looks like there's no such muscle and the wings are just aesthetic but non-functional.
$endgroup$
– Matthieu M.
Apr 7 at 9:24
$begingroup$
It's a nice picture, and typical Fantasy depiction... but from an anatomy point of view it is plainly insufficient. Wings typically require a massive muscle to beat them (it has to lift the whole body, after all), and it's very unclear in your picture where said muscle would be. Actually, it looks like there's no such muscle and the wings are just aesthetic but non-functional.
$endgroup$
– Matthieu M.
Apr 7 at 9:24
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143396%2fdragon-forelimb-placement%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Depends on the dragon's attitude in flight. The wings must attach to the spinal column so that when the dragon assumes the flight attitude the attachment is above the center of gravity (or maybe a little forward of it if the dragon has a suitable tail which can act as an airfoil). Conversely, if you fix the attachment of the wings to the spinal column you can assume that in flight the dragon will assume the attitude which brings the center of gravity below the wing attachment point. As for the muscles, they don't interfere; flight muscles attach most likely to the sternum, unlike limb muscles.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
Apr 6 at 17:44
$begingroup$
There is no way to answer this question where it would connect would depend entirely on how and where the limb evolved, what joints it has, and where the muscles are ect. flight musculature is not uniform in vertebrates. Birds and bats have a very different layout of flight muscles for instance. Since we don't know these things we can not give a definitive answer, there are many many correct answers. The only thing you can do is lay out the limbs so their range of movements do not meet each other.
$endgroup$
– John
Apr 6 at 21:33
$begingroup$
I can suggest you look at the art from, A Natural History of Dragons: A Memoir by Lady Trent, it has probably the most sound anatomy I have ever seen for dragons, with a minimum of interference between the limbs. This will show you at least one way it can be done.
$endgroup$
– John
Apr 6 at 21:38
$begingroup$
But do dragons really need large flight muscles? If they exist in a world with magic, then a reasonable explanation is that they evolved a natural flight magic that offsets their mass and lets their wings be much weaker than otherwise required. Same explanation for the firebreathing - human mages study to recreate the same fire spells that dragons know genetically.
$endgroup$
– Sir Adelaide
Apr 7 at 12:12