How can I validate python code in a Jupyter Notebook?
I am looking for a way to do the above within a coding class for students. The idea is to check in the background if the code the students created e.g. returns the correct value or performs the correct routine.
That way I could make sure the code works and will be useful in the forthcoming cells. What would be the best way to do so and to give feedback/hints as to what was done wrong?
This should of course be not visible to the students as they should figure out the answers themselves. Should I send the code to be validated by some other kernel? Is there an optimal way?
python jupyter-notebook jupyter
asked Nov 23 '18 at 9:35
user3507070user3507070
213
add a comment |
I am looking for a way to do the above within a coding class for students. The idea is to check in the background if the code the students created e.g. returns the correct value or performs the correct routine.
That way I could make sure the code works and will be useful in the forthcoming cells. What would be the best way to do so and to give feedback/hints as to what was done wrong?
This should of course be not visible to the students as they should figure out the answers themselves. Should I send the code to be validated by some other kernel? Is there an optimal way?
python jupyter-notebook jupyter
asked Nov 23 '18 at 9:35
user3507070user3507070
213
Perhaps this is better suited for cseducators.stackexchange.com
– juanpa.arrivillaga
Nov 23 '18 at 9:37
add a comment |
I am looking for a way to do the above within a coding class for students. The idea is to check in the background if the code the students created e.g. returns the correct value or performs the correct routine.
That way I could make sure the code works and will be useful in the forthcoming cells. What would be the best way to do so and to give feedback/hints as to what was done wrong?
This should of course be not visible to the students as they should figure out the answers themselves. Should I send the code to be validated by some other kernel? Is there an optimal way?
python jupyter-notebook jupyter
asked Nov 23 '18 at 9:35
user3507070user3507070
213
I am looking for a way to do the above within a coding class for students. The idea is to check in the background if the code the students created e.g. returns the correct value or performs the correct routine.
That way I could make sure the code works and will be useful in the forthcoming cells. What would be the best way to do so and to give feedback/hints as to what was done wrong?
This should of course be not visible to the students as they should figure out the answers themselves. Should I send the code to be validated by some other kernel? Is there an optimal way?
python jupyter-notebook jupyter
python jupyter-notebook jupyter
asked Nov 23 '18 at 9:35
user3507070user3507070
213
asked Nov 23 '18 at 9:35
user3507070user3507070
213
asked Nov 23 '18 at 9:35
user3507070user3507070
213
asked Nov 23 '18 at 9:35
user3507070user3507070
213
asked Nov 23 '18 at 9:35
user3507070user3507070
213
213
Perhaps this is better suited for cseducators.stackexchange.com
– juanpa.arrivillaga
Nov 23 '18 at 9:37
add a comment |
Perhaps this is better suited for cseducators.stackexchange.com
– juanpa.arrivillaga
Nov 23 '18 at 9:37
Perhaps this is better suited for cseducators.stackexchange.com
– juanpa.arrivillaga
Nov 23 '18 at 9:37
Perhaps this is better suited for cseducators.stackexchange.com
– juanpa.arrivillaga
Nov 23 '18 at 9:37
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
You could write tests for the tasks you hand out to your students. Depending on which ones fail proceed to print possible fixes.
answered Nov 23 '18 at 9:39
Daniel EinarsDaniel Einars
5212
add a comment |
This should of course be not visible to the students as they should figure out the answers themselves.
This is usually the wrong tactic. You should provide a set of test cases that expect correct output that the student can run their test against. Recall that Test-Driven Development teaches that application code should only be written to satisfy existing unit tests. Since you're assigning the application code: you need to write the unit tests to be passed!
answered Nov 23 '18 at 9:49
Adam SmithAdam Smith
35.3k73376
add a comment |
It might be overkill for what you want to do, but INGInious might help here. From the website:
INGInious is a secure and automated exercises assessment platform
using your own tests, also providing a pluggable interface with your
existing LMS.
It offers all the infrastructure to test student code and give feedback.
Disclaimer: It is developed by people in my university
answered Nov 23 '18 at 9:58
damienfrancoisdamienfrancois
26.5k55064
add a comment |
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53443995%2fhow-can-i-validate-python-code-in-a-jupyter-notebook%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You could write tests for the tasks you hand out to your students. Depending on which ones fail proceed to print possible fixes.
answered Nov 23 '18 at 9:39
Daniel EinarsDaniel Einars
5212
add a comment |
You could write tests for the tasks you hand out to your students. Depending on which ones fail proceed to print possible fixes.
answered Nov 23 '18 at 9:39
Daniel EinarsDaniel Einars
5212
add a comment |
You could write tests for the tasks you hand out to your students. Depending on which ones fail proceed to print possible fixes.
answered Nov 23 '18 at 9:39
Daniel EinarsDaniel Einars
5212
You could write tests for the tasks you hand out to your students. Depending on which ones fail proceed to print possible fixes.
answered Nov 23 '18 at 9:39
Daniel EinarsDaniel Einars
5212
answered Nov 23 '18 at 9:39
Daniel EinarsDaniel Einars
5212
answered Nov 23 '18 at 9:39
Daniel EinarsDaniel Einars
5212
answered Nov 23 '18 at 9:39
Daniel EinarsDaniel Einars
5212
5212
add a comment |
add a comment |
This should of course be not visible to the students as they should figure out the answers themselves.
This is usually the wrong tactic. You should provide a set of test cases that expect correct output that the student can run their test against. Recall that Test-Driven Development teaches that application code should only be written to satisfy existing unit tests. Since you're assigning the application code: you need to write the unit tests to be passed!
answered Nov 23 '18 at 9:49
Adam SmithAdam Smith
35.3k73376
add a comment |
This should of course be not visible to the students as they should figure out the answers themselves.
This is usually the wrong tactic. You should provide a set of test cases that expect correct output that the student can run their test against. Recall that Test-Driven Development teaches that application code should only be written to satisfy existing unit tests. Since you're assigning the application code: you need to write the unit tests to be passed!
answered Nov 23 '18 at 9:49
Adam SmithAdam Smith
35.3k73376
add a comment |
This should of course be not visible to the students as they should figure out the answers themselves.
This is usually the wrong tactic. You should provide a set of test cases that expect correct output that the student can run their test against. Recall that Test-Driven Development teaches that application code should only be written to satisfy existing unit tests. Since you're assigning the application code: you need to write the unit tests to be passed!
answered Nov 23 '18 at 9:49
Adam SmithAdam Smith
35.3k73376
This should of course be not visible to the students as they should figure out the answers themselves.
This is usually the wrong tactic. You should provide a set of test cases that expect correct output that the student can run their test against. Recall that Test-Driven Development teaches that application code should only be written to satisfy existing unit tests. Since you're assigning the application code: you need to write the unit tests to be passed!
answered Nov 23 '18 at 9:49
Adam SmithAdam Smith
35.3k73376
answered Nov 23 '18 at 9:49
Adam SmithAdam Smith
35.3k73376
answered Nov 23 '18 at 9:49
Adam SmithAdam Smith
35.3k73376
answered Nov 23 '18 at 9:49
Adam SmithAdam Smith
35.3k73376
35.3k73376
add a comment |
add a comment |
It might be overkill for what you want to do, but INGInious might help here. From the website:
INGInious is a secure and automated exercises assessment platform
using your own tests, also providing a pluggable interface with your
existing LMS.
It offers all the infrastructure to test student code and give feedback.
Disclaimer: It is developed by people in my university
answered Nov 23 '18 at 9:58
damienfrancoisdamienfrancois
26.5k55064
add a comment |
It might be overkill for what you want to do, but INGInious might help here. From the website:
INGInious is a secure and automated exercises assessment platform
using your own tests, also providing a pluggable interface with your
existing LMS.
It offers all the infrastructure to test student code and give feedback.
Disclaimer: It is developed by people in my university
answered Nov 23 '18 at 9:58
damienfrancoisdamienfrancois
26.5k55064
add a comment |
It might be overkill for what you want to do, but INGInious might help here. From the website:
INGInious is a secure and automated exercises assessment platform
using your own tests, also providing a pluggable interface with your
existing LMS.
It offers all the infrastructure to test student code and give feedback.
Disclaimer: It is developed by people in my university
answered Nov 23 '18 at 9:58
damienfrancoisdamienfrancois
26.5k55064
It might be overkill for what you want to do, but INGInious might help here. From the website:
INGInious is a secure and automated exercises assessment platform
using your own tests, also providing a pluggable interface with your
existing LMS.
It offers all the infrastructure to test student code and give feedback.
Disclaimer: It is developed by people in my university
answered Nov 23 '18 at 9:58
damienfrancoisdamienfrancois
26.5k55064
answered Nov 23 '18 at 9:58
damienfrancoisdamienfrancois
26.5k55064
answered Nov 23 '18 at 9:58
damienfrancoisdamienfrancois
26.5k55064
answered Nov 23 '18 at 9:58
damienfrancoisdamienfrancois
26.5k55064
26.5k55064
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53443995%2fhow-can-i-validate-python-code-in-a-jupyter-notebook%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Perhaps this is better suited for cseducators.stackexchange.com
– juanpa.arrivillaga
Nov 23 '18 at 9:37