How to discuss my unexpected experimental results? [closed]
In my research, I found that my proposed scheme does not provide very "high performance" gains as compared to the conventional scheme I was testing against.
Still, my results are better and I am submitting them to a conference. How can I rephrase the following in an apt manner?
Here, we would like to mention that this increase is lower than our
initial expectation.
phrase-requests writing-style research
asked Mar 24 at 5:27
SjaffrySjaffry
1124
closed as primarily opinion-based by Jason Bassford, tchrist♦ Mar 24 at 16:11
Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |
In my research, I found that my proposed scheme does not provide very "high performance" gains as compared to the conventional scheme I was testing against.
Still, my results are better and I am submitting them to a conference. How can I rephrase the following in an apt manner?
Here, we would like to mention that this increase is lower than our
initial expectation.
phrase-requests writing-style research
asked Mar 24 at 5:27
SjaffrySjaffry
1124
closed as primarily opinion-based by Jason Bassford, tchrist♦ Mar 24 at 16:11
Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
1
There are many ways to express the idea. The one you have suggested is OK. Unless you give some guidance as to what idea, other than the basic fact, you wish to convey, we have nothing to base advice on. Do you wish to say "We were so wrong!" or "We had hoped for more"?
– TRomano
Mar 24 at 11:19
I mean to say, "We had hoped for more"
– Sjaffry
Mar 25 at 0:05
add a comment |
In my research, I found that my proposed scheme does not provide very "high performance" gains as compared to the conventional scheme I was testing against.
Still, my results are better and I am submitting them to a conference. How can I rephrase the following in an apt manner?
Here, we would like to mention that this increase is lower than our
initial expectation.
phrase-requests writing-style research
asked Mar 24 at 5:27
SjaffrySjaffry
1124
In my research, I found that my proposed scheme does not provide very "high performance" gains as compared to the conventional scheme I was testing against.
Still, my results are better and I am submitting them to a conference. How can I rephrase the following in an apt manner?
Here, we would like to mention that this increase is lower than our
initial expectation.
phrase-requests writing-style research
phrase-requests writing-style research
asked Mar 24 at 5:27
SjaffrySjaffry
1124
asked Mar 24 at 5:27
SjaffrySjaffry
1124
asked Mar 24 at 5:27
SjaffrySjaffry
1124
asked Mar 24 at 5:27
SjaffrySjaffry
1124
asked Mar 24 at 5:27
SjaffrySjaffry
1124
1124
closed as primarily opinion-based by Jason Bassford, tchrist♦ Mar 24 at 16:11
Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
closed as primarily opinion-based by Jason Bassford, tchrist♦ Mar 24 at 16:11
Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
1
There are many ways to express the idea. The one you have suggested is OK. Unless you give some guidance as to what idea, other than the basic fact, you wish to convey, we have nothing to base advice on. Do you wish to say "We were so wrong!" or "We had hoped for more"?
– TRomano
Mar 24 at 11:19
I mean to say, "We had hoped for more"
– Sjaffry
Mar 25 at 0:05
add a comment |
1
There are many ways to express the idea. The one you have suggested is OK. Unless you give some guidance as to what idea, other than the basic fact, you wish to convey, we have nothing to base advice on. Do you wish to say "We were so wrong!" or "We had hoped for more"?
– TRomano
Mar 24 at 11:19
I mean to say, "We had hoped for more"
– Sjaffry
Mar 25 at 0:05
1
1
There are many ways to express the idea. The one you have suggested is OK. Unless you give some guidance as to what idea, other than the basic fact, you wish to convey, we have nothing to base advice on. Do you wish to say "We were so wrong!" or "We had hoped for more"?
– TRomano
Mar 24 at 11:19
There are many ways to express the idea. The one you have suggested is OK. Unless you give some guidance as to what idea, other than the basic fact, you wish to convey, we have nothing to base advice on. Do you wish to say "We were so wrong!" or "We had hoped for more"?
– TRomano
Mar 24 at 11:19
I mean to say, "We had hoped for more"
– Sjaffry
Mar 25 at 0:05
I mean to say, "We had hoped for more"
– Sjaffry
Mar 25 at 0:05
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
It sounds fine to me. I might suggest adding a few additional words - "but is still significant nevertheless". It gives direction to the ultimate idea you are trying to convey.
Here, we would like to mention that this increase is lower than our
initial expectation, but is still significant nevertheless.
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/nevertheless
answered Mar 24 at 11:32
user22542user22542
3,7051411
add a comment |
I am going to drift a little away with this link to your question, but I thought it could be useful or wide-eye open to you. replication crisis
I hesitate if significant is the right word since it must imply a statistic calculus and it means the variables have a certain correlation either positive or negative.
I would just say:
as soon as the scheme is amended the performance is lower. (that has to have an explanation).
answered Mar 24 at 12:45
NicoleNicole
213
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
It sounds fine to me. I might suggest adding a few additional words - "but is still significant nevertheless". It gives direction to the ultimate idea you are trying to convey.
Here, we would like to mention that this increase is lower than our
initial expectation, but is still significant nevertheless.
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/nevertheless
answered Mar 24 at 11:32
user22542user22542
3,7051411
add a comment |
It sounds fine to me. I might suggest adding a few additional words - "but is still significant nevertheless". It gives direction to the ultimate idea you are trying to convey.
Here, we would like to mention that this increase is lower than our
initial expectation, but is still significant nevertheless.
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/nevertheless
answered Mar 24 at 11:32
user22542user22542
3,7051411
add a comment |
It sounds fine to me. I might suggest adding a few additional words - "but is still significant nevertheless". It gives direction to the ultimate idea you are trying to convey.
Here, we would like to mention that this increase is lower than our
initial expectation, but is still significant nevertheless.
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/nevertheless
answered Mar 24 at 11:32
user22542user22542
3,7051411
It sounds fine to me. I might suggest adding a few additional words - "but is still significant nevertheless". It gives direction to the ultimate idea you are trying to convey.
Here, we would like to mention that this increase is lower than our
initial expectation, but is still significant nevertheless.
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/nevertheless
answered Mar 24 at 11:32
user22542user22542
3,7051411
answered Mar 24 at 11:32
user22542user22542
3,7051411
answered Mar 24 at 11:32
user22542user22542
3,7051411
answered Mar 24 at 11:32
user22542user22542
3,7051411
3,7051411
add a comment |
add a comment |
I am going to drift a little away with this link to your question, but I thought it could be useful or wide-eye open to you. replication crisis
I hesitate if significant is the right word since it must imply a statistic calculus and it means the variables have a certain correlation either positive or negative.
I would just say:
as soon as the scheme is amended the performance is lower. (that has to have an explanation).
answered Mar 24 at 12:45
NicoleNicole
213
add a comment |
I am going to drift a little away with this link to your question, but I thought it could be useful or wide-eye open to you. replication crisis
I hesitate if significant is the right word since it must imply a statistic calculus and it means the variables have a certain correlation either positive or negative.
I would just say:
as soon as the scheme is amended the performance is lower. (that has to have an explanation).
answered Mar 24 at 12:45
NicoleNicole
213
add a comment |
I am going to drift a little away with this link to your question, but I thought it could be useful or wide-eye open to you. replication crisis
I hesitate if significant is the right word since it must imply a statistic calculus and it means the variables have a certain correlation either positive or negative.
I would just say:
as soon as the scheme is amended the performance is lower. (that has to have an explanation).
answered Mar 24 at 12:45
NicoleNicole
213
I am going to drift a little away with this link to your question, but I thought it could be useful or wide-eye open to you. replication crisis
I hesitate if significant is the right word since it must imply a statistic calculus and it means the variables have a certain correlation either positive or negative.
I would just say:
as soon as the scheme is amended the performance is lower. (that has to have an explanation).
answered Mar 24 at 12:45
NicoleNicole
213
answered Mar 24 at 12:45
NicoleNicole
213
answered Mar 24 at 12:45
NicoleNicole
213
answered Mar 24 at 12:45
NicoleNicole
213
213
add a comment |
add a comment |
1
There are many ways to express the idea. The one you have suggested is OK. Unless you give some guidance as to what idea, other than the basic fact, you wish to convey, we have nothing to base advice on. Do you wish to say "We were so wrong!" or "We had hoped for more"?
– TRomano
Mar 24 at 11:19
I mean to say, "We had hoped for more"
– Sjaffry
Mar 25 at 0:05