Request info on 12/48v PSU
$begingroup$
I've got a power supply unit from a defunct/decommissioned Satellite Internet setup, and I'm hoping to get clarification on some of the markings on the label.
In the following picture, there's four pin numbers, followed underneath of pins 1 and 2 both volts and max amps, and pins 3 and 4 simply "RETURN".
My question is whether I'm reading the label correctly. (Technically, I've got a few questions here).
Does max(A) under pin 1 mean that at 12v I've got 2.99A available, and at the 48v pin, I've got a max of 0.82A?
Also, when pins 3 and 4 are reflected as return, I'm assuming that means ground, yes?
I'll summarize my questions here to consolidate:
Is pin 1 +12v @ 2.99A?
Is pin 2 +48v @ 0.82A?
Are pins 3 and 4 ground pins, that could (and potentially should) be wired together if both pin 1 and 2 are in use simultaneously?
Here's the pic of the label of the power supply in question:

power-supply
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I've got a power supply unit from a defunct/decommissioned Satellite Internet setup, and I'm hoping to get clarification on some of the markings on the label.
In the following picture, there's four pin numbers, followed underneath of pins 1 and 2 both volts and max amps, and pins 3 and 4 simply "RETURN".
My question is whether I'm reading the label correctly. (Technically, I've got a few questions here).
Does max(A) under pin 1 mean that at 12v I've got 2.99A available, and at the 48v pin, I've got a max of 0.82A?
Also, when pins 3 and 4 are reflected as return, I'm assuming that means ground, yes?
I'll summarize my questions here to consolidate:
Is pin 1 +12v @ 2.99A?
Is pin 2 +48v @ 0.82A?
Are pins 3 and 4 ground pins, that could (and potentially should) be wired together if both pin 1 and 2 are in use simultaneously?
Here's the pic of the label of the power supply in question:

power-supply
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
To me it seems your interpretation of the label is correct.
$endgroup$
– K. S.
Mar 24 at 0:42
1
$begingroup$
@K.S. I thought so. It appears obvious, but I thought I'd ask the experts.
$endgroup$
– stevieb
Mar 24 at 0:44
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I've got a power supply unit from a defunct/decommissioned Satellite Internet setup, and I'm hoping to get clarification on some of the markings on the label.
In the following picture, there's four pin numbers, followed underneath of pins 1 and 2 both volts and max amps, and pins 3 and 4 simply "RETURN".
My question is whether I'm reading the label correctly. (Technically, I've got a few questions here).
Does max(A) under pin 1 mean that at 12v I've got 2.99A available, and at the 48v pin, I've got a max of 0.82A?
Also, when pins 3 and 4 are reflected as return, I'm assuming that means ground, yes?
I'll summarize my questions here to consolidate:
Is pin 1 +12v @ 2.99A?
Is pin 2 +48v @ 0.82A?
Are pins 3 and 4 ground pins, that could (and potentially should) be wired together if both pin 1 and 2 are in use simultaneously?
Here's the pic of the label of the power supply in question:

power-supply
$endgroup$
I've got a power supply unit from a defunct/decommissioned Satellite Internet setup, and I'm hoping to get clarification on some of the markings on the label.
In the following picture, there's four pin numbers, followed underneath of pins 1 and 2 both volts and max amps, and pins 3 and 4 simply "RETURN".
My question is whether I'm reading the label correctly. (Technically, I've got a few questions here).
Does max(A) under pin 1 mean that at 12v I've got 2.99A available, and at the 48v pin, I've got a max of 0.82A?
Also, when pins 3 and 4 are reflected as return, I'm assuming that means ground, yes?
I'll summarize my questions here to consolidate:
Is pin 1 +12v @ 2.99A?
Is pin 2 +48v @ 0.82A?
Are pins 3 and 4 ground pins, that could (and potentially should) be wired together if both pin 1 and 2 are in use simultaneously?
Here's the pic of the label of the power supply in question:

power-supply
power-supply
edited Mar 24 at 14:37
Electric_90
1,565519
1,565519
asked Mar 24 at 0:33
steviebstevieb
1338
1338
2
$begingroup$
To me it seems your interpretation of the label is correct.
$endgroup$
– K. S.
Mar 24 at 0:42
1
$begingroup$
@K.S. I thought so. It appears obvious, but I thought I'd ask the experts.
$endgroup$
– stevieb
Mar 24 at 0:44
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
To me it seems your interpretation of the label is correct.
$endgroup$
– K. S.
Mar 24 at 0:42
1
$begingroup$
@K.S. I thought so. It appears obvious, but I thought I'd ask the experts.
$endgroup$
– stevieb
Mar 24 at 0:44
2
2
$begingroup$
To me it seems your interpretation of the label is correct.
$endgroup$
– K. S.
Mar 24 at 0:42
$begingroup$
To me it seems your interpretation of the label is correct.
$endgroup$
– K. S.
Mar 24 at 0:42
1
1
$begingroup$
@K.S. I thought so. It appears obvious, but I thought I'd ask the experts.
$endgroup$
– stevieb
Mar 24 at 0:44
$begingroup$
@K.S. I thought so. It appears obvious, but I thought I'd ask the experts.
$endgroup$
– stevieb
Mar 24 at 0:44
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Yes, your interpretation of the label is correct as far as I can tell.
Note also that $12 mathrm{V}·2.99 mathrm{A} + 48 mathrm{V}·0.82 mathrm{A} = 75.24 mathrm{W}$, in agreement with the 75 W power rating. This, combined with how simple this interpretation of the markings is, is sufficient evidence for me to say with confidence that you are correct.

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab
$endgroup$
add a comment |
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("schematics", function () {
StackExchange.schematics.init();
});
}, "cicuitlab");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "135"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f428753%2frequest-info-on-12-48v-psu%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Yes, your interpretation of the label is correct as far as I can tell.
Note also that $12 mathrm{V}·2.99 mathrm{A} + 48 mathrm{V}·0.82 mathrm{A} = 75.24 mathrm{W}$, in agreement with the 75 W power rating. This, combined with how simple this interpretation of the markings is, is sufficient evidence for me to say with confidence that you are correct.

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, your interpretation of the label is correct as far as I can tell.
Note also that $12 mathrm{V}·2.99 mathrm{A} + 48 mathrm{V}·0.82 mathrm{A} = 75.24 mathrm{W}$, in agreement with the 75 W power rating. This, combined with how simple this interpretation of the markings is, is sufficient evidence for me to say with confidence that you are correct.

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, your interpretation of the label is correct as far as I can tell.
Note also that $12 mathrm{V}·2.99 mathrm{A} + 48 mathrm{V}·0.82 mathrm{A} = 75.24 mathrm{W}$, in agreement with the 75 W power rating. This, combined with how simple this interpretation of the markings is, is sufficient evidence for me to say with confidence that you are correct.

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab
$endgroup$
Yes, your interpretation of the label is correct as far as I can tell.
Note also that $12 mathrm{V}·2.99 mathrm{A} + 48 mathrm{V}·0.82 mathrm{A} = 75.24 mathrm{W}$, in agreement with the 75 W power rating. This, combined with how simple this interpretation of the markings is, is sufficient evidence for me to say with confidence that you are correct.

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab
edited Mar 24 at 1:58
Jasen
11.5k1531
11.5k1531
answered Mar 24 at 0:50
HearthHearth
4,7551237
4,7551237
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f428753%2frequest-info-on-12-48v-psu%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown

2
$begingroup$
To me it seems your interpretation of the label is correct.
$endgroup$
– K. S.
Mar 24 at 0:42
1
$begingroup$
@K.S. I thought so. It appears obvious, but I thought I'd ask the experts.
$endgroup$
– stevieb
Mar 24 at 0:44