is the sentence complete? [on hold]
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
Although initially conferred of the armed forces solely on the basis of their performance in combat, the award now recognises all contributions to national life.
I only can find one verb (recognise) here. Is there any verb in "Although initially conferred of the armed forces solely on the basis of their performance in combat,..."
If not, why is the sentence complete?
grammaticality
put on hold as off-topic by Dan Bron, Mark Beadles, Jason Bassford, Lambie, J. Taylor yesterday
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – Mark Beadles, Jason Bassford, J. Taylor
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
Although initially conferred of the armed forces solely on the basis of their performance in combat, the award now recognises all contributions to national life.
I only can find one verb (recognise) here. Is there any verb in "Although initially conferred of the armed forces solely on the basis of their performance in combat,..."
If not, why is the sentence complete?
grammaticality
put on hold as off-topic by Dan Bron, Mark Beadles, Jason Bassford, Lambie, J. Taylor yesterday
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – Mark Beadles, Jason Bassford, J. Taylor
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
1
Where do you think another verb should go? 'Although' introduces a subordinate adverbial clause. It probably should be 'in the armed forces' though.
– Mitch
2 days ago
1
@DC glory: the original has "upon," not "of" (ieltsasia.org/hk/sites/www.ieltsasia.org.hk/files/…).
– Wordster
2 days ago
@Mitch Thanks, Mitch. It meant we do need a verb in a subordinate adverbial clause?
– DC glory
2 days ago
@Wordster thanks. It is much better than using application.
– DC glory
2 days ago
I'm surprised that nobody else has said this, but confer is a verb—and only a verb.
– Jason Bassford
2 days ago
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
Although initially conferred of the armed forces solely on the basis of their performance in combat, the award now recognises all contributions to national life.
I only can find one verb (recognise) here. Is there any verb in "Although initially conferred of the armed forces solely on the basis of their performance in combat,..."
If not, why is the sentence complete?
grammaticality
Although initially conferred of the armed forces solely on the basis of their performance in combat, the award now recognises all contributions to national life.
I only can find one verb (recognise) here. Is there any verb in "Although initially conferred of the armed forces solely on the basis of their performance in combat,..."
If not, why is the sentence complete?
grammaticality
grammaticality
edited yesterday
Barmar
9,4671429
9,4671429
asked 2 days ago
DC glory
1
1
put on hold as off-topic by Dan Bron, Mark Beadles, Jason Bassford, Lambie, J. Taylor yesterday
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – Mark Beadles, Jason Bassford, J. Taylor
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
put on hold as off-topic by Dan Bron, Mark Beadles, Jason Bassford, Lambie, J. Taylor yesterday
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – Mark Beadles, Jason Bassford, J. Taylor
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
1
Where do you think another verb should go? 'Although' introduces a subordinate adverbial clause. It probably should be 'in the armed forces' though.
– Mitch
2 days ago
1
@DC glory: the original has "upon," not "of" (ieltsasia.org/hk/sites/www.ieltsasia.org.hk/files/…).
– Wordster
2 days ago
@Mitch Thanks, Mitch. It meant we do need a verb in a subordinate adverbial clause?
– DC glory
2 days ago
@Wordster thanks. It is much better than using application.
– DC glory
2 days ago
I'm surprised that nobody else has said this, but confer is a verb—and only a verb.
– Jason Bassford
2 days ago
|
show 1 more comment
1
Where do you think another verb should go? 'Although' introduces a subordinate adverbial clause. It probably should be 'in the armed forces' though.
– Mitch
2 days ago
1
@DC glory: the original has "upon," not "of" (ieltsasia.org/hk/sites/www.ieltsasia.org.hk/files/…).
– Wordster
2 days ago
@Mitch Thanks, Mitch. It meant we do need a verb in a subordinate adverbial clause?
– DC glory
2 days ago
@Wordster thanks. It is much better than using application.
– DC glory
2 days ago
I'm surprised that nobody else has said this, but confer is a verb—and only a verb.
– Jason Bassford
2 days ago
1
1
Where do you think another verb should go? 'Although' introduces a subordinate adverbial clause. It probably should be 'in the armed forces' though.
– Mitch
2 days ago
Where do you think another verb should go? 'Although' introduces a subordinate adverbial clause. It probably should be 'in the armed forces' though.
– Mitch
2 days ago
1
1
@DC glory: the original has "upon," not "of" (ieltsasia.org/hk/sites/www.ieltsasia.org.hk/files/…).
– Wordster
2 days ago
@DC glory: the original has "upon," not "of" (ieltsasia.org/hk/sites/www.ieltsasia.org.hk/files/…).
– Wordster
2 days ago
@Mitch Thanks, Mitch. It meant we do need a verb in a subordinate adverbial clause?
– DC glory
2 days ago
@Mitch Thanks, Mitch. It meant we do need a verb in a subordinate adverbial clause?
– DC glory
2 days ago
@Wordster thanks. It is much better than using application.
– DC glory
2 days ago
@Wordster thanks. It is much better than using application.
– DC glory
2 days ago
I'm surprised that nobody else has said this, but confer is a verb—and only a verb.
– Jason Bassford
2 days ago
I'm surprised that nobody else has said this, but confer is a verb—and only a verb.
– Jason Bassford
2 days ago
|
show 1 more comment
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
Confer and recognise are both verbs in that sentence, and it is a complete sentence.
New contributor
Thomas Quinlan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Hi Thomas. Please note, the system has flagged your answer for deletion as "low-quality because of its length and content." An answer on this site is expected to be authoritative, detailed, and explain why it is correct; it's not sufficient to post an unsupported opinion. You can edit your answer to avoid deletion; for further guidance, see How to Answer. :-)
– Chappo
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
-2
down vote
You don't always need a verb in a relative clause. For instance, the following is acceptable:
Although initially gold, the award is now silver.
There's an elided subject and verb in the relative clause, it's equivalent to:
Although it was initially gold, the award is now silver.
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
Confer and recognise are both verbs in that sentence, and it is a complete sentence.
New contributor
Thomas Quinlan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Hi Thomas. Please note, the system has flagged your answer for deletion as "low-quality because of its length and content." An answer on this site is expected to be authoritative, detailed, and explain why it is correct; it's not sufficient to post an unsupported opinion. You can edit your answer to avoid deletion; for further guidance, see How to Answer. :-)
– Chappo
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Confer and recognise are both verbs in that sentence, and it is a complete sentence.
New contributor
Thomas Quinlan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Hi Thomas. Please note, the system has flagged your answer for deletion as "low-quality because of its length and content." An answer on this site is expected to be authoritative, detailed, and explain why it is correct; it's not sufficient to post an unsupported opinion. You can edit your answer to avoid deletion; for further guidance, see How to Answer. :-)
– Chappo
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Confer and recognise are both verbs in that sentence, and it is a complete sentence.
New contributor
Thomas Quinlan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Confer and recognise are both verbs in that sentence, and it is a complete sentence.
New contributor
Thomas Quinlan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Thomas Quinlan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered yesterday
Thomas Quinlan
2963
2963
New contributor
Thomas Quinlan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Thomas Quinlan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Thomas Quinlan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Hi Thomas. Please note, the system has flagged your answer for deletion as "low-quality because of its length and content." An answer on this site is expected to be authoritative, detailed, and explain why it is correct; it's not sufficient to post an unsupported opinion. You can edit your answer to avoid deletion; for further guidance, see How to Answer. :-)
– Chappo
yesterday
add a comment |
Hi Thomas. Please note, the system has flagged your answer for deletion as "low-quality because of its length and content." An answer on this site is expected to be authoritative, detailed, and explain why it is correct; it's not sufficient to post an unsupported opinion. You can edit your answer to avoid deletion; for further guidance, see How to Answer. :-)
– Chappo
yesterday
Hi Thomas. Please note, the system has flagged your answer for deletion as "low-quality because of its length and content." An answer on this site is expected to be authoritative, detailed, and explain why it is correct; it's not sufficient to post an unsupported opinion. You can edit your answer to avoid deletion; for further guidance, see How to Answer. :-)
– Chappo
yesterday
Hi Thomas. Please note, the system has flagged your answer for deletion as "low-quality because of its length and content." An answer on this site is expected to be authoritative, detailed, and explain why it is correct; it's not sufficient to post an unsupported opinion. You can edit your answer to avoid deletion; for further guidance, see How to Answer. :-)
– Chappo
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
-2
down vote
You don't always need a verb in a relative clause. For instance, the following is acceptable:
Although initially gold, the award is now silver.
There's an elided subject and verb in the relative clause, it's equivalent to:
Although it was initially gold, the award is now silver.
add a comment |
up vote
-2
down vote
You don't always need a verb in a relative clause. For instance, the following is acceptable:
Although initially gold, the award is now silver.
There's an elided subject and verb in the relative clause, it's equivalent to:
Although it was initially gold, the award is now silver.
add a comment |
up vote
-2
down vote
up vote
-2
down vote
You don't always need a verb in a relative clause. For instance, the following is acceptable:
Although initially gold, the award is now silver.
There's an elided subject and verb in the relative clause, it's equivalent to:
Although it was initially gold, the award is now silver.
You don't always need a verb in a relative clause. For instance, the following is acceptable:
Although initially gold, the award is now silver.
There's an elided subject and verb in the relative clause, it's equivalent to:
Although it was initially gold, the award is now silver.
answered yesterday
Barmar
9,4671429
9,4671429
add a comment |
add a comment |
1
Where do you think another verb should go? 'Although' introduces a subordinate adverbial clause. It probably should be 'in the armed forces' though.
– Mitch
2 days ago
1
@DC glory: the original has "upon," not "of" (ieltsasia.org/hk/sites/www.ieltsasia.org.hk/files/…).
– Wordster
2 days ago
@Mitch Thanks, Mitch. It meant we do need a verb in a subordinate adverbial clause?
– DC glory
2 days ago
@Wordster thanks. It is much better than using application.
– DC glory
2 days ago
I'm surprised that nobody else has said this, but confer is a verb—and only a verb.
– Jason Bassford
2 days ago