Undesirable shadows with Haskell OpenGL











up vote
6
down vote

favorite
1












I have drawn the Barth sextic with Haskell OpenGL and there's a problem. I have also drawn it in R (with packages rgl and misc3d) and there's no problem. The two algorithms (in Haskell and R) are very similar. The Barth sextic is an implicit surface, and in Haskell I compute a triangulation of this surface with a marching cubes algorithm that I got by translating the one of misc3d to Haskell and C. I use the vertex normals, each defined by the gradient of the implicit equation.



Here is the problem:



enter image description here



I don't want these black shadows. When I look at the back of the sextic, by a 180° rotation, there's no such shadow:



enter image description here



The full code is available in this Github repo. Here are the parts of the code relevant to the colors:



fuchsia :: Color4 GLfloat
fuchsia = Color4 1.00 0.00 1.00 1
discord :: Color4 GLfloat
discord = Color4 0.21 0.22 0.25 1

renderPrimitive Triangles $ mapM_ drawTriangle triangles
swapBuffers
where
drawTriangle ((v1,v2,v3), (n1,n2,n3)) = do
materialDiffuse FrontAndBack $= fuchsia
normal n1
vertex v1
normal n2
vertex v2
normal n3
vertex v3

clearColor $= discord
materialAmbient FrontAndBack $= black
materialDiffuse FrontAndBack $= white
materialEmission FrontAndBack $= black
lighting $= Enabled
lightModelTwoSide $= Enabled
light (Light 0) $= Enabled
position (Light 0) $= Vertex4 0 0 (-1000) 1
ambient (Light 0) $= white
diffuse (Light 0) $= white
specular (Light 0) $= white


I have tried to change the colors in this last piece of code, but no way to get rid of these shadows. Am I doing something bad with the colors? I am sure the normals are correct because this works in R. However the shadows appear where the surface is not smooth, so I'm wondering whether the issue is caused by the normals.



The R rendering:



gfycat



Edit



I have managed to get rid of these shadows:



enter image description here



I don't really know how, I've done so many attempts... But anyway, now the problem is that the back of the sextic is too lighty:



enter image description here










share|improve this question




















  • 1




    Color-debug the normals
    – Nadir
    Nov 16 at 10:30










  • @Nadir What do you mean?
    – Stéphane Laurent
    Nov 16 at 10:37






  • 1




    Instead of drawing the shaded color of your implicit surface, set the color output as if the normal vector would be a color.
    – Nadir
    Nov 16 at 11:08






  • 1




    The thing is that the real normals of the surface are changing too quickly and the coarse triangulation cannot reproduce them. Therefore, one thing you can try is to increase the Marching Cubes resolution. Cusps like these are always problematic for per-vertex normals since you cannot reasonably interpolate them. A second option would be to leave them as corners and duplicate the vertices using separate normals (which you evaluate a bit off the vertex inside the face).
    – Nico Schertler
    Nov 16 at 13:46






  • 1




    That's really weird. I observe a similar behavior when there's only one light, at (0,0,0), which is the center of the object.
    – Stéphane Laurent
    Nov 16 at 17:05















up vote
6
down vote

favorite
1












I have drawn the Barth sextic with Haskell OpenGL and there's a problem. I have also drawn it in R (with packages rgl and misc3d) and there's no problem. The two algorithms (in Haskell and R) are very similar. The Barth sextic is an implicit surface, and in Haskell I compute a triangulation of this surface with a marching cubes algorithm that I got by translating the one of misc3d to Haskell and C. I use the vertex normals, each defined by the gradient of the implicit equation.



Here is the problem:



enter image description here



I don't want these black shadows. When I look at the back of the sextic, by a 180° rotation, there's no such shadow:



enter image description here



The full code is available in this Github repo. Here are the parts of the code relevant to the colors:



fuchsia :: Color4 GLfloat
fuchsia = Color4 1.00 0.00 1.00 1
discord :: Color4 GLfloat
discord = Color4 0.21 0.22 0.25 1

renderPrimitive Triangles $ mapM_ drawTriangle triangles
swapBuffers
where
drawTriangle ((v1,v2,v3), (n1,n2,n3)) = do
materialDiffuse FrontAndBack $= fuchsia
normal n1
vertex v1
normal n2
vertex v2
normal n3
vertex v3

clearColor $= discord
materialAmbient FrontAndBack $= black
materialDiffuse FrontAndBack $= white
materialEmission FrontAndBack $= black
lighting $= Enabled
lightModelTwoSide $= Enabled
light (Light 0) $= Enabled
position (Light 0) $= Vertex4 0 0 (-1000) 1
ambient (Light 0) $= white
diffuse (Light 0) $= white
specular (Light 0) $= white


I have tried to change the colors in this last piece of code, but no way to get rid of these shadows. Am I doing something bad with the colors? I am sure the normals are correct because this works in R. However the shadows appear where the surface is not smooth, so I'm wondering whether the issue is caused by the normals.



The R rendering:



gfycat



Edit



I have managed to get rid of these shadows:



enter image description here



I don't really know how, I've done so many attempts... But anyway, now the problem is that the back of the sextic is too lighty:



enter image description here










share|improve this question




















  • 1




    Color-debug the normals
    – Nadir
    Nov 16 at 10:30










  • @Nadir What do you mean?
    – Stéphane Laurent
    Nov 16 at 10:37






  • 1




    Instead of drawing the shaded color of your implicit surface, set the color output as if the normal vector would be a color.
    – Nadir
    Nov 16 at 11:08






  • 1




    The thing is that the real normals of the surface are changing too quickly and the coarse triangulation cannot reproduce them. Therefore, one thing you can try is to increase the Marching Cubes resolution. Cusps like these are always problematic for per-vertex normals since you cannot reasonably interpolate them. A second option would be to leave them as corners and duplicate the vertices using separate normals (which you evaluate a bit off the vertex inside the face).
    – Nico Schertler
    Nov 16 at 13:46






  • 1




    That's really weird. I observe a similar behavior when there's only one light, at (0,0,0), which is the center of the object.
    – Stéphane Laurent
    Nov 16 at 17:05













up vote
6
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
6
down vote

favorite
1






1





I have drawn the Barth sextic with Haskell OpenGL and there's a problem. I have also drawn it in R (with packages rgl and misc3d) and there's no problem. The two algorithms (in Haskell and R) are very similar. The Barth sextic is an implicit surface, and in Haskell I compute a triangulation of this surface with a marching cubes algorithm that I got by translating the one of misc3d to Haskell and C. I use the vertex normals, each defined by the gradient of the implicit equation.



Here is the problem:



enter image description here



I don't want these black shadows. When I look at the back of the sextic, by a 180° rotation, there's no such shadow:



enter image description here



The full code is available in this Github repo. Here are the parts of the code relevant to the colors:



fuchsia :: Color4 GLfloat
fuchsia = Color4 1.00 0.00 1.00 1
discord :: Color4 GLfloat
discord = Color4 0.21 0.22 0.25 1

renderPrimitive Triangles $ mapM_ drawTriangle triangles
swapBuffers
where
drawTriangle ((v1,v2,v3), (n1,n2,n3)) = do
materialDiffuse FrontAndBack $= fuchsia
normal n1
vertex v1
normal n2
vertex v2
normal n3
vertex v3

clearColor $= discord
materialAmbient FrontAndBack $= black
materialDiffuse FrontAndBack $= white
materialEmission FrontAndBack $= black
lighting $= Enabled
lightModelTwoSide $= Enabled
light (Light 0) $= Enabled
position (Light 0) $= Vertex4 0 0 (-1000) 1
ambient (Light 0) $= white
diffuse (Light 0) $= white
specular (Light 0) $= white


I have tried to change the colors in this last piece of code, but no way to get rid of these shadows. Am I doing something bad with the colors? I am sure the normals are correct because this works in R. However the shadows appear where the surface is not smooth, so I'm wondering whether the issue is caused by the normals.



The R rendering:



gfycat



Edit



I have managed to get rid of these shadows:



enter image description here



I don't really know how, I've done so many attempts... But anyway, now the problem is that the back of the sextic is too lighty:



enter image description here










share|improve this question















I have drawn the Barth sextic with Haskell OpenGL and there's a problem. I have also drawn it in R (with packages rgl and misc3d) and there's no problem. The two algorithms (in Haskell and R) are very similar. The Barth sextic is an implicit surface, and in Haskell I compute a triangulation of this surface with a marching cubes algorithm that I got by translating the one of misc3d to Haskell and C. I use the vertex normals, each defined by the gradient of the implicit equation.



Here is the problem:



enter image description here



I don't want these black shadows. When I look at the back of the sextic, by a 180° rotation, there's no such shadow:



enter image description here



The full code is available in this Github repo. Here are the parts of the code relevant to the colors:



fuchsia :: Color4 GLfloat
fuchsia = Color4 1.00 0.00 1.00 1
discord :: Color4 GLfloat
discord = Color4 0.21 0.22 0.25 1

renderPrimitive Triangles $ mapM_ drawTriangle triangles
swapBuffers
where
drawTriangle ((v1,v2,v3), (n1,n2,n3)) = do
materialDiffuse FrontAndBack $= fuchsia
normal n1
vertex v1
normal n2
vertex v2
normal n3
vertex v3

clearColor $= discord
materialAmbient FrontAndBack $= black
materialDiffuse FrontAndBack $= white
materialEmission FrontAndBack $= black
lighting $= Enabled
lightModelTwoSide $= Enabled
light (Light 0) $= Enabled
position (Light 0) $= Vertex4 0 0 (-1000) 1
ambient (Light 0) $= white
diffuse (Light 0) $= white
specular (Light 0) $= white


I have tried to change the colors in this last piece of code, but no way to get rid of these shadows. Am I doing something bad with the colors? I am sure the normals are correct because this works in R. However the shadows appear where the surface is not smooth, so I'm wondering whether the issue is caused by the normals.



The R rendering:



gfycat



Edit



I have managed to get rid of these shadows:



enter image description here



I don't really know how, I've done so many attempts... But anyway, now the problem is that the back of the sextic is too lighty:



enter image description here







haskell opengl marching-cubes






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 17 at 10:17

























asked Nov 16 at 8:11









Stéphane Laurent

11.9k65291




11.9k65291








  • 1




    Color-debug the normals
    – Nadir
    Nov 16 at 10:30










  • @Nadir What do you mean?
    – Stéphane Laurent
    Nov 16 at 10:37






  • 1




    Instead of drawing the shaded color of your implicit surface, set the color output as if the normal vector would be a color.
    – Nadir
    Nov 16 at 11:08






  • 1




    The thing is that the real normals of the surface are changing too quickly and the coarse triangulation cannot reproduce them. Therefore, one thing you can try is to increase the Marching Cubes resolution. Cusps like these are always problematic for per-vertex normals since you cannot reasonably interpolate them. A second option would be to leave them as corners and duplicate the vertices using separate normals (which you evaluate a bit off the vertex inside the face).
    – Nico Schertler
    Nov 16 at 13:46






  • 1




    That's really weird. I observe a similar behavior when there's only one light, at (0,0,0), which is the center of the object.
    – Stéphane Laurent
    Nov 16 at 17:05














  • 1




    Color-debug the normals
    – Nadir
    Nov 16 at 10:30










  • @Nadir What do you mean?
    – Stéphane Laurent
    Nov 16 at 10:37






  • 1




    Instead of drawing the shaded color of your implicit surface, set the color output as if the normal vector would be a color.
    – Nadir
    Nov 16 at 11:08






  • 1




    The thing is that the real normals of the surface are changing too quickly and the coarse triangulation cannot reproduce them. Therefore, one thing you can try is to increase the Marching Cubes resolution. Cusps like these are always problematic for per-vertex normals since you cannot reasonably interpolate them. A second option would be to leave them as corners and duplicate the vertices using separate normals (which you evaluate a bit off the vertex inside the face).
    – Nico Schertler
    Nov 16 at 13:46






  • 1




    That's really weird. I observe a similar behavior when there's only one light, at (0,0,0), which is the center of the object.
    – Stéphane Laurent
    Nov 16 at 17:05








1




1




Color-debug the normals
– Nadir
Nov 16 at 10:30




Color-debug the normals
– Nadir
Nov 16 at 10:30












@Nadir What do you mean?
– Stéphane Laurent
Nov 16 at 10:37




@Nadir What do you mean?
– Stéphane Laurent
Nov 16 at 10:37




1




1




Instead of drawing the shaded color of your implicit surface, set the color output as if the normal vector would be a color.
– Nadir
Nov 16 at 11:08




Instead of drawing the shaded color of your implicit surface, set the color output as if the normal vector would be a color.
– Nadir
Nov 16 at 11:08




1




1




The thing is that the real normals of the surface are changing too quickly and the coarse triangulation cannot reproduce them. Therefore, one thing you can try is to increase the Marching Cubes resolution. Cusps like these are always problematic for per-vertex normals since you cannot reasonably interpolate them. A second option would be to leave them as corners and duplicate the vertices using separate normals (which you evaluate a bit off the vertex inside the face).
– Nico Schertler
Nov 16 at 13:46




The thing is that the real normals of the surface are changing too quickly and the coarse triangulation cannot reproduce them. Therefore, one thing you can try is to increase the Marching Cubes resolution. Cusps like these are always problematic for per-vertex normals since you cannot reasonably interpolate them. A second option would be to leave them as corners and duplicate the vertices using separate normals (which you evaluate a bit off the vertex inside the face).
– Nico Schertler
Nov 16 at 13:46




1




1




That's really weird. I observe a similar behavior when there's only one light, at (0,0,0), which is the center of the object.
– Stéphane Laurent
Nov 16 at 17:05




That's really weird. I observe a similar behavior when there's only one light, at (0,0,0), which is the center of the object.
– Stéphane Laurent
Nov 16 at 17:05












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote













Now the rendering is nice :-)



enter image description here



I don't know what caused the problem because I have done numerous changes... Here are the relevant parts of the code:



resize :: Double -> Size -> IO ()
resize zoom s@(Size w h) = do
viewport $= (Position 0 0, s)
matrixMode $= Projection
loadIdentity
perspective 45.0 (w'/h') 1.0 100.0
lookAt (Vertex3 0 0 (-6+zoom)) (Vertex3 0 0 0) (Vector3 0 1 0)
matrixMode $= Modelview 0
where
w' = realToFrac w
h' = realToFrac h




main :: IO ()
main = do
_ <- getArgsAndInitialize
_ <- createWindow "Barth Sextic"
windowSize $= Size 500 500
initialDisplayMode $= [RGBMode, DoubleBuffered, WithDepthBuffer]
clearColor $= discord
clientState ColorArray $= Disabled -- this is a default option, I think
materialAmbient Front $= black
materialDiffuse Front $= white
materialEmission Front $= Color4 0 0 0 0
materialSpecular Front $= white
materialShininess Front $= 50
lighting $= Enabled
light (Light 0) $= Enabled
position (Light 0) $= Vertex4 500 500 (-1000) 1
diffuse (Light 0) $= white
specular (Light 0) $= white
lightModelAmbient $= Color4 0.35 0.35 0.35 1
depthMask $= Enabled -- this is default option
depthFunc $= Just Lequal
shadeModel $= Smooth
fog $= Disabled -- this is default option, I think
polygonMode $= (Fill, Fill) -- this is default option
polygonSmooth $= Enabled
cullFace $= Just Front
rescaleNormal $= Enabled
......


I have also changed the order of the vertices of each triangle:



drawTriangle ((v1,v2,v3), (n1,n2,n3)) = do
materialDiffuse Front $= fuchsia
normal n1
vertex v1
normal n3
vertex v3
normal n2
vertex v2


This answer is a bit premature. I will investigate more later, and I'll edit to write my findings.



EDIT



Well, I have done further investigations and sadly, my conclusion is that I have no explanation: I have reverted all my changes, and no way to reproduce the issue !!



Now I use this shorter code:



display :: ...... -> displayCallback
......
renderPrimitive Triangles $
mapM_ drawTriangle triangles
swapBuffers
where
drawTriangle ((v1,v2,v3), (n1,n2,n3)) = do
materialDiffuse Front $= fuchsia
normal n1
vertex v1
normal n2
vertex v2
normal n3
vertex v3




resize :: Double -> Size -> IO ()
resize zoom s@(Size w h) = do
viewport $= (Position 0 0, s)
matrixMode $= Projection
loadIdentity
perspective 45.0 (w'/h') 1.0 100.0
lookAt (Vertex3 0 0 (-6+zoom)) (Vertex3 0 0 0) (Vector3 0 1 0)
matrixMode $= Modelview 0
where
w' = realToFrac w
h' = realToFrac h


The two MatrixMode are important.



main :: IO ()
main = do
_ <- getArgsAndInitialize
_ <- createWindow "Barth Sextic"
windowSize $= Size 500 500
initialDisplayMode $= [RGBMode, DoubleBuffered, WithDepthBuffer]
clearColor $= discord
materialAmbient Front $= black
materialDiffuse Front $= white
materialEmission Front $= black
lighting $= Enabled
light (Light 0) $= Enabled
position (Light 0) $= Vertex4 500 500 (-1000) 1
ambient (Light 0) $= white
diffuse (Light 0) $= white
specular (Light 0) $= white
depthFunc $= Just Less
shadeModel $= Smooth
cullFace $= Just Back
......


polygonSmooth and rescaleNormal were useless. I have also changed the position of the light but this is not the point which caused the issue. The cullFace is not necessary but it is good because there's no visible back face.






share|improve this answer























  • There are two things that stand out to me here: - rescaleNormal $= Enabled, which may be correctly "fixing" your normals. - The location of your light is in a much different position. My hunch is that the likely cause of your original problem was due to incorrect normals.
    – Mokosha
    Nov 18 at 8:53










  • Thanks @Mokosha. I will try later to unset each option one by one, in order to find the smoking gun. I have also changed the order of the vertices of each triangle, I would not be surprised if this was the source of the problem.
    – Stéphane Laurent
    Nov 18 at 9:00










  • @Mokosha Nope. The rescaleNormal has no effect, and the issue was not due to the position of the light (see my edit). I'm lost. I am sure I have reproduced the code which caused the issue, but now it causes no issue... Surely I forget a subtle point, or this was a bug.
    – Stéphane Laurent
    2 days ago











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53333805%2fundesirable-shadows-with-haskell-opengl%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
1
down vote













Now the rendering is nice :-)



enter image description here



I don't know what caused the problem because I have done numerous changes... Here are the relevant parts of the code:



resize :: Double -> Size -> IO ()
resize zoom s@(Size w h) = do
viewport $= (Position 0 0, s)
matrixMode $= Projection
loadIdentity
perspective 45.0 (w'/h') 1.0 100.0
lookAt (Vertex3 0 0 (-6+zoom)) (Vertex3 0 0 0) (Vector3 0 1 0)
matrixMode $= Modelview 0
where
w' = realToFrac w
h' = realToFrac h




main :: IO ()
main = do
_ <- getArgsAndInitialize
_ <- createWindow "Barth Sextic"
windowSize $= Size 500 500
initialDisplayMode $= [RGBMode, DoubleBuffered, WithDepthBuffer]
clearColor $= discord
clientState ColorArray $= Disabled -- this is a default option, I think
materialAmbient Front $= black
materialDiffuse Front $= white
materialEmission Front $= Color4 0 0 0 0
materialSpecular Front $= white
materialShininess Front $= 50
lighting $= Enabled
light (Light 0) $= Enabled
position (Light 0) $= Vertex4 500 500 (-1000) 1
diffuse (Light 0) $= white
specular (Light 0) $= white
lightModelAmbient $= Color4 0.35 0.35 0.35 1
depthMask $= Enabled -- this is default option
depthFunc $= Just Lequal
shadeModel $= Smooth
fog $= Disabled -- this is default option, I think
polygonMode $= (Fill, Fill) -- this is default option
polygonSmooth $= Enabled
cullFace $= Just Front
rescaleNormal $= Enabled
......


I have also changed the order of the vertices of each triangle:



drawTriangle ((v1,v2,v3), (n1,n2,n3)) = do
materialDiffuse Front $= fuchsia
normal n1
vertex v1
normal n3
vertex v3
normal n2
vertex v2


This answer is a bit premature. I will investigate more later, and I'll edit to write my findings.



EDIT



Well, I have done further investigations and sadly, my conclusion is that I have no explanation: I have reverted all my changes, and no way to reproduce the issue !!



Now I use this shorter code:



display :: ...... -> displayCallback
......
renderPrimitive Triangles $
mapM_ drawTriangle triangles
swapBuffers
where
drawTriangle ((v1,v2,v3), (n1,n2,n3)) = do
materialDiffuse Front $= fuchsia
normal n1
vertex v1
normal n2
vertex v2
normal n3
vertex v3




resize :: Double -> Size -> IO ()
resize zoom s@(Size w h) = do
viewport $= (Position 0 0, s)
matrixMode $= Projection
loadIdentity
perspective 45.0 (w'/h') 1.0 100.0
lookAt (Vertex3 0 0 (-6+zoom)) (Vertex3 0 0 0) (Vector3 0 1 0)
matrixMode $= Modelview 0
where
w' = realToFrac w
h' = realToFrac h


The two MatrixMode are important.



main :: IO ()
main = do
_ <- getArgsAndInitialize
_ <- createWindow "Barth Sextic"
windowSize $= Size 500 500
initialDisplayMode $= [RGBMode, DoubleBuffered, WithDepthBuffer]
clearColor $= discord
materialAmbient Front $= black
materialDiffuse Front $= white
materialEmission Front $= black
lighting $= Enabled
light (Light 0) $= Enabled
position (Light 0) $= Vertex4 500 500 (-1000) 1
ambient (Light 0) $= white
diffuse (Light 0) $= white
specular (Light 0) $= white
depthFunc $= Just Less
shadeModel $= Smooth
cullFace $= Just Back
......


polygonSmooth and rescaleNormal were useless. I have also changed the position of the light but this is not the point which caused the issue. The cullFace is not necessary but it is good because there's no visible back face.






share|improve this answer























  • There are two things that stand out to me here: - rescaleNormal $= Enabled, which may be correctly "fixing" your normals. - The location of your light is in a much different position. My hunch is that the likely cause of your original problem was due to incorrect normals.
    – Mokosha
    Nov 18 at 8:53










  • Thanks @Mokosha. I will try later to unset each option one by one, in order to find the smoking gun. I have also changed the order of the vertices of each triangle, I would not be surprised if this was the source of the problem.
    – Stéphane Laurent
    Nov 18 at 9:00










  • @Mokosha Nope. The rescaleNormal has no effect, and the issue was not due to the position of the light (see my edit). I'm lost. I am sure I have reproduced the code which caused the issue, but now it causes no issue... Surely I forget a subtle point, or this was a bug.
    – Stéphane Laurent
    2 days ago















up vote
1
down vote













Now the rendering is nice :-)



enter image description here



I don't know what caused the problem because I have done numerous changes... Here are the relevant parts of the code:



resize :: Double -> Size -> IO ()
resize zoom s@(Size w h) = do
viewport $= (Position 0 0, s)
matrixMode $= Projection
loadIdentity
perspective 45.0 (w'/h') 1.0 100.0
lookAt (Vertex3 0 0 (-6+zoom)) (Vertex3 0 0 0) (Vector3 0 1 0)
matrixMode $= Modelview 0
where
w' = realToFrac w
h' = realToFrac h




main :: IO ()
main = do
_ <- getArgsAndInitialize
_ <- createWindow "Barth Sextic"
windowSize $= Size 500 500
initialDisplayMode $= [RGBMode, DoubleBuffered, WithDepthBuffer]
clearColor $= discord
clientState ColorArray $= Disabled -- this is a default option, I think
materialAmbient Front $= black
materialDiffuse Front $= white
materialEmission Front $= Color4 0 0 0 0
materialSpecular Front $= white
materialShininess Front $= 50
lighting $= Enabled
light (Light 0) $= Enabled
position (Light 0) $= Vertex4 500 500 (-1000) 1
diffuse (Light 0) $= white
specular (Light 0) $= white
lightModelAmbient $= Color4 0.35 0.35 0.35 1
depthMask $= Enabled -- this is default option
depthFunc $= Just Lequal
shadeModel $= Smooth
fog $= Disabled -- this is default option, I think
polygonMode $= (Fill, Fill) -- this is default option
polygonSmooth $= Enabled
cullFace $= Just Front
rescaleNormal $= Enabled
......


I have also changed the order of the vertices of each triangle:



drawTriangle ((v1,v2,v3), (n1,n2,n3)) = do
materialDiffuse Front $= fuchsia
normal n1
vertex v1
normal n3
vertex v3
normal n2
vertex v2


This answer is a bit premature. I will investigate more later, and I'll edit to write my findings.



EDIT



Well, I have done further investigations and sadly, my conclusion is that I have no explanation: I have reverted all my changes, and no way to reproduce the issue !!



Now I use this shorter code:



display :: ...... -> displayCallback
......
renderPrimitive Triangles $
mapM_ drawTriangle triangles
swapBuffers
where
drawTriangle ((v1,v2,v3), (n1,n2,n3)) = do
materialDiffuse Front $= fuchsia
normal n1
vertex v1
normal n2
vertex v2
normal n3
vertex v3




resize :: Double -> Size -> IO ()
resize zoom s@(Size w h) = do
viewport $= (Position 0 0, s)
matrixMode $= Projection
loadIdentity
perspective 45.0 (w'/h') 1.0 100.0
lookAt (Vertex3 0 0 (-6+zoom)) (Vertex3 0 0 0) (Vector3 0 1 0)
matrixMode $= Modelview 0
where
w' = realToFrac w
h' = realToFrac h


The two MatrixMode are important.



main :: IO ()
main = do
_ <- getArgsAndInitialize
_ <- createWindow "Barth Sextic"
windowSize $= Size 500 500
initialDisplayMode $= [RGBMode, DoubleBuffered, WithDepthBuffer]
clearColor $= discord
materialAmbient Front $= black
materialDiffuse Front $= white
materialEmission Front $= black
lighting $= Enabled
light (Light 0) $= Enabled
position (Light 0) $= Vertex4 500 500 (-1000) 1
ambient (Light 0) $= white
diffuse (Light 0) $= white
specular (Light 0) $= white
depthFunc $= Just Less
shadeModel $= Smooth
cullFace $= Just Back
......


polygonSmooth and rescaleNormal were useless. I have also changed the position of the light but this is not the point which caused the issue. The cullFace is not necessary but it is good because there's no visible back face.






share|improve this answer























  • There are two things that stand out to me here: - rescaleNormal $= Enabled, which may be correctly "fixing" your normals. - The location of your light is in a much different position. My hunch is that the likely cause of your original problem was due to incorrect normals.
    – Mokosha
    Nov 18 at 8:53










  • Thanks @Mokosha. I will try later to unset each option one by one, in order to find the smoking gun. I have also changed the order of the vertices of each triangle, I would not be surprised if this was the source of the problem.
    – Stéphane Laurent
    Nov 18 at 9:00










  • @Mokosha Nope. The rescaleNormal has no effect, and the issue was not due to the position of the light (see my edit). I'm lost. I am sure I have reproduced the code which caused the issue, but now it causes no issue... Surely I forget a subtle point, or this was a bug.
    – Stéphane Laurent
    2 days ago













up vote
1
down vote










up vote
1
down vote









Now the rendering is nice :-)



enter image description here



I don't know what caused the problem because I have done numerous changes... Here are the relevant parts of the code:



resize :: Double -> Size -> IO ()
resize zoom s@(Size w h) = do
viewport $= (Position 0 0, s)
matrixMode $= Projection
loadIdentity
perspective 45.0 (w'/h') 1.0 100.0
lookAt (Vertex3 0 0 (-6+zoom)) (Vertex3 0 0 0) (Vector3 0 1 0)
matrixMode $= Modelview 0
where
w' = realToFrac w
h' = realToFrac h




main :: IO ()
main = do
_ <- getArgsAndInitialize
_ <- createWindow "Barth Sextic"
windowSize $= Size 500 500
initialDisplayMode $= [RGBMode, DoubleBuffered, WithDepthBuffer]
clearColor $= discord
clientState ColorArray $= Disabled -- this is a default option, I think
materialAmbient Front $= black
materialDiffuse Front $= white
materialEmission Front $= Color4 0 0 0 0
materialSpecular Front $= white
materialShininess Front $= 50
lighting $= Enabled
light (Light 0) $= Enabled
position (Light 0) $= Vertex4 500 500 (-1000) 1
diffuse (Light 0) $= white
specular (Light 0) $= white
lightModelAmbient $= Color4 0.35 0.35 0.35 1
depthMask $= Enabled -- this is default option
depthFunc $= Just Lequal
shadeModel $= Smooth
fog $= Disabled -- this is default option, I think
polygonMode $= (Fill, Fill) -- this is default option
polygonSmooth $= Enabled
cullFace $= Just Front
rescaleNormal $= Enabled
......


I have also changed the order of the vertices of each triangle:



drawTriangle ((v1,v2,v3), (n1,n2,n3)) = do
materialDiffuse Front $= fuchsia
normal n1
vertex v1
normal n3
vertex v3
normal n2
vertex v2


This answer is a bit premature. I will investigate more later, and I'll edit to write my findings.



EDIT



Well, I have done further investigations and sadly, my conclusion is that I have no explanation: I have reverted all my changes, and no way to reproduce the issue !!



Now I use this shorter code:



display :: ...... -> displayCallback
......
renderPrimitive Triangles $
mapM_ drawTriangle triangles
swapBuffers
where
drawTriangle ((v1,v2,v3), (n1,n2,n3)) = do
materialDiffuse Front $= fuchsia
normal n1
vertex v1
normal n2
vertex v2
normal n3
vertex v3




resize :: Double -> Size -> IO ()
resize zoom s@(Size w h) = do
viewport $= (Position 0 0, s)
matrixMode $= Projection
loadIdentity
perspective 45.0 (w'/h') 1.0 100.0
lookAt (Vertex3 0 0 (-6+zoom)) (Vertex3 0 0 0) (Vector3 0 1 0)
matrixMode $= Modelview 0
where
w' = realToFrac w
h' = realToFrac h


The two MatrixMode are important.



main :: IO ()
main = do
_ <- getArgsAndInitialize
_ <- createWindow "Barth Sextic"
windowSize $= Size 500 500
initialDisplayMode $= [RGBMode, DoubleBuffered, WithDepthBuffer]
clearColor $= discord
materialAmbient Front $= black
materialDiffuse Front $= white
materialEmission Front $= black
lighting $= Enabled
light (Light 0) $= Enabled
position (Light 0) $= Vertex4 500 500 (-1000) 1
ambient (Light 0) $= white
diffuse (Light 0) $= white
specular (Light 0) $= white
depthFunc $= Just Less
shadeModel $= Smooth
cullFace $= Just Back
......


polygonSmooth and rescaleNormal were useless. I have also changed the position of the light but this is not the point which caused the issue. The cullFace is not necessary but it is good because there's no visible back face.






share|improve this answer














Now the rendering is nice :-)



enter image description here



I don't know what caused the problem because I have done numerous changes... Here are the relevant parts of the code:



resize :: Double -> Size -> IO ()
resize zoom s@(Size w h) = do
viewport $= (Position 0 0, s)
matrixMode $= Projection
loadIdentity
perspective 45.0 (w'/h') 1.0 100.0
lookAt (Vertex3 0 0 (-6+zoom)) (Vertex3 0 0 0) (Vector3 0 1 0)
matrixMode $= Modelview 0
where
w' = realToFrac w
h' = realToFrac h




main :: IO ()
main = do
_ <- getArgsAndInitialize
_ <- createWindow "Barth Sextic"
windowSize $= Size 500 500
initialDisplayMode $= [RGBMode, DoubleBuffered, WithDepthBuffer]
clearColor $= discord
clientState ColorArray $= Disabled -- this is a default option, I think
materialAmbient Front $= black
materialDiffuse Front $= white
materialEmission Front $= Color4 0 0 0 0
materialSpecular Front $= white
materialShininess Front $= 50
lighting $= Enabled
light (Light 0) $= Enabled
position (Light 0) $= Vertex4 500 500 (-1000) 1
diffuse (Light 0) $= white
specular (Light 0) $= white
lightModelAmbient $= Color4 0.35 0.35 0.35 1
depthMask $= Enabled -- this is default option
depthFunc $= Just Lequal
shadeModel $= Smooth
fog $= Disabled -- this is default option, I think
polygonMode $= (Fill, Fill) -- this is default option
polygonSmooth $= Enabled
cullFace $= Just Front
rescaleNormal $= Enabled
......


I have also changed the order of the vertices of each triangle:



drawTriangle ((v1,v2,v3), (n1,n2,n3)) = do
materialDiffuse Front $= fuchsia
normal n1
vertex v1
normal n3
vertex v3
normal n2
vertex v2


This answer is a bit premature. I will investigate more later, and I'll edit to write my findings.



EDIT



Well, I have done further investigations and sadly, my conclusion is that I have no explanation: I have reverted all my changes, and no way to reproduce the issue !!



Now I use this shorter code:



display :: ...... -> displayCallback
......
renderPrimitive Triangles $
mapM_ drawTriangle triangles
swapBuffers
where
drawTriangle ((v1,v2,v3), (n1,n2,n3)) = do
materialDiffuse Front $= fuchsia
normal n1
vertex v1
normal n2
vertex v2
normal n3
vertex v3




resize :: Double -> Size -> IO ()
resize zoom s@(Size w h) = do
viewport $= (Position 0 0, s)
matrixMode $= Projection
loadIdentity
perspective 45.0 (w'/h') 1.0 100.0
lookAt (Vertex3 0 0 (-6+zoom)) (Vertex3 0 0 0) (Vector3 0 1 0)
matrixMode $= Modelview 0
where
w' = realToFrac w
h' = realToFrac h


The two MatrixMode are important.



main :: IO ()
main = do
_ <- getArgsAndInitialize
_ <- createWindow "Barth Sextic"
windowSize $= Size 500 500
initialDisplayMode $= [RGBMode, DoubleBuffered, WithDepthBuffer]
clearColor $= discord
materialAmbient Front $= black
materialDiffuse Front $= white
materialEmission Front $= black
lighting $= Enabled
light (Light 0) $= Enabled
position (Light 0) $= Vertex4 500 500 (-1000) 1
ambient (Light 0) $= white
diffuse (Light 0) $= white
specular (Light 0) $= white
depthFunc $= Just Less
shadeModel $= Smooth
cullFace $= Just Back
......


polygonSmooth and rescaleNormal were useless. I have also changed the position of the light but this is not the point which caused the issue. The cullFace is not necessary but it is good because there's no visible back face.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 2 days ago

























answered Nov 17 at 20:55









Stéphane Laurent

11.9k65291




11.9k65291












  • There are two things that stand out to me here: - rescaleNormal $= Enabled, which may be correctly "fixing" your normals. - The location of your light is in a much different position. My hunch is that the likely cause of your original problem was due to incorrect normals.
    – Mokosha
    Nov 18 at 8:53










  • Thanks @Mokosha. I will try later to unset each option one by one, in order to find the smoking gun. I have also changed the order of the vertices of each triangle, I would not be surprised if this was the source of the problem.
    – Stéphane Laurent
    Nov 18 at 9:00










  • @Mokosha Nope. The rescaleNormal has no effect, and the issue was not due to the position of the light (see my edit). I'm lost. I am sure I have reproduced the code which caused the issue, but now it causes no issue... Surely I forget a subtle point, or this was a bug.
    – Stéphane Laurent
    2 days ago


















  • There are two things that stand out to me here: - rescaleNormal $= Enabled, which may be correctly "fixing" your normals. - The location of your light is in a much different position. My hunch is that the likely cause of your original problem was due to incorrect normals.
    – Mokosha
    Nov 18 at 8:53










  • Thanks @Mokosha. I will try later to unset each option one by one, in order to find the smoking gun. I have also changed the order of the vertices of each triangle, I would not be surprised if this was the source of the problem.
    – Stéphane Laurent
    Nov 18 at 9:00










  • @Mokosha Nope. The rescaleNormal has no effect, and the issue was not due to the position of the light (see my edit). I'm lost. I am sure I have reproduced the code which caused the issue, but now it causes no issue... Surely I forget a subtle point, or this was a bug.
    – Stéphane Laurent
    2 days ago
















There are two things that stand out to me here: - rescaleNormal $= Enabled, which may be correctly "fixing" your normals. - The location of your light is in a much different position. My hunch is that the likely cause of your original problem was due to incorrect normals.
– Mokosha
Nov 18 at 8:53




There are two things that stand out to me here: - rescaleNormal $= Enabled, which may be correctly "fixing" your normals. - The location of your light is in a much different position. My hunch is that the likely cause of your original problem was due to incorrect normals.
– Mokosha
Nov 18 at 8:53












Thanks @Mokosha. I will try later to unset each option one by one, in order to find the smoking gun. I have also changed the order of the vertices of each triangle, I would not be surprised if this was the source of the problem.
– Stéphane Laurent
Nov 18 at 9:00




Thanks @Mokosha. I will try later to unset each option one by one, in order to find the smoking gun. I have also changed the order of the vertices of each triangle, I would not be surprised if this was the source of the problem.
– Stéphane Laurent
Nov 18 at 9:00












@Mokosha Nope. The rescaleNormal has no effect, and the issue was not due to the position of the light (see my edit). I'm lost. I am sure I have reproduced the code which caused the issue, but now it causes no issue... Surely I forget a subtle point, or this was a bug.
– Stéphane Laurent
2 days ago




@Mokosha Nope. The rescaleNormal has no effect, and the issue was not due to the position of the light (see my edit). I'm lost. I am sure I have reproduced the code which caused the issue, but now it causes no issue... Surely I forget a subtle point, or this was a bug.
– Stéphane Laurent
2 days ago


















 

draft saved


draft discarded



















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53333805%2fundesirable-shadows-with-haskell-opengl%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

"Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

Alcedinidae

Origin of the phrase “under your belt”?