Data science related funny quotes
up vote
27
down vote
favorite
It has been customary for the users of different communities to quote funny things about their fields. It may be fun to share your funny things about Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Data Science and the things that you face every day!
machine-learning neural-network deep-learning humor
|
show 4 more comments
up vote
27
down vote
favorite
It has been customary for the users of different communities to quote funny things about their fields. It may be fun to share your funny things about Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Data Science and the things that you face every day!
machine-learning neural-network deep-learning humor
1
Not quite data science, as it's more data management & archiving, but see youtube.com/watch?v=N2zK3sAtr-4
– Joe
Dec 15 at 23:36
2
I like this, but really, does this belong here? Maybe it's better off on the Meta.
– Mr Lister
2 days ago
1
@MrLister as I've mentioned, you can see this post in other comunities too. It has been just for fun :) don't take that seriously. On the other hand I don't think it is off topic. It is about datascience, isn't it?
– Media
2 days ago
1
related: stats.stackexchange.com/questions/1337/statistics-jokes and stats.stackexchange.com/questions/423/…
– moooeeeep
yesterday
1
How many epochs will we need to find ourselves in an epoch (Hellenic meaning), where the machine learning algorithm can make good jokes, to post here?
– gsamaras
15 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
up vote
27
down vote
favorite
up vote
27
down vote
favorite
It has been customary for the users of different communities to quote funny things about their fields. It may be fun to share your funny things about Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Data Science and the things that you face every day!
machine-learning neural-network deep-learning humor
It has been customary for the users of different communities to quote funny things about their fields. It may be fun to share your funny things about Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Data Science and the things that you face every day!
machine-learning neural-network deep-learning humor
machine-learning neural-network deep-learning humor
edited 17 hours ago
community wiki
5 revs, 2 users 70%
Media
1
Not quite data science, as it's more data management & archiving, but see youtube.com/watch?v=N2zK3sAtr-4
– Joe
Dec 15 at 23:36
2
I like this, but really, does this belong here? Maybe it's better off on the Meta.
– Mr Lister
2 days ago
1
@MrLister as I've mentioned, you can see this post in other comunities too. It has been just for fun :) don't take that seriously. On the other hand I don't think it is off topic. It is about datascience, isn't it?
– Media
2 days ago
1
related: stats.stackexchange.com/questions/1337/statistics-jokes and stats.stackexchange.com/questions/423/…
– moooeeeep
yesterday
1
How many epochs will we need to find ourselves in an epoch (Hellenic meaning), where the machine learning algorithm can make good jokes, to post here?
– gsamaras
15 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
1
Not quite data science, as it's more data management & archiving, but see youtube.com/watch?v=N2zK3sAtr-4
– Joe
Dec 15 at 23:36
2
I like this, but really, does this belong here? Maybe it's better off on the Meta.
– Mr Lister
2 days ago
1
@MrLister as I've mentioned, you can see this post in other comunities too. It has been just for fun :) don't take that seriously. On the other hand I don't think it is off topic. It is about datascience, isn't it?
– Media
2 days ago
1
related: stats.stackexchange.com/questions/1337/statistics-jokes and stats.stackexchange.com/questions/423/…
– moooeeeep
yesterday
1
How many epochs will we need to find ourselves in an epoch (Hellenic meaning), where the machine learning algorithm can make good jokes, to post here?
– gsamaras
15 hours ago
1
1
Not quite data science, as it's more data management & archiving, but see youtube.com/watch?v=N2zK3sAtr-4
– Joe
Dec 15 at 23:36
Not quite data science, as it's more data management & archiving, but see youtube.com/watch?v=N2zK3sAtr-4
– Joe
Dec 15 at 23:36
2
2
I like this, but really, does this belong here? Maybe it's better off on the Meta.
– Mr Lister
2 days ago
I like this, but really, does this belong here? Maybe it's better off on the Meta.
– Mr Lister
2 days ago
1
1
@MrLister as I've mentioned, you can see this post in other comunities too. It has been just for fun :) don't take that seriously. On the other hand I don't think it is off topic. It is about datascience, isn't it?
– Media
2 days ago
@MrLister as I've mentioned, you can see this post in other comunities too. It has been just for fun :) don't take that seriously. On the other hand I don't think it is off topic. It is about datascience, isn't it?
– Media
2 days ago
1
1
related: stats.stackexchange.com/questions/1337/statistics-jokes and stats.stackexchange.com/questions/423/…
– moooeeeep
yesterday
related: stats.stackexchange.com/questions/1337/statistics-jokes and stats.stackexchange.com/questions/423/…
– moooeeeep
yesterday
1
1
How many epochs will we need to find ourselves in an epoch (Hellenic meaning), where the machine learning algorithm can make good jokes, to post here?
– gsamaras
15 hours ago
How many epochs will we need to find ourselves in an epoch (Hellenic meaning), where the machine learning algorithm can make good jokes, to post here?
– gsamaras
15 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
10 Answers
10
active
oldest
votes
up vote
31
down vote
Q: How many machine learning specialists does it take to change a light bulb?
A: Just one, but they require a million light bulbs to train properly.
Q: How many machine learning specialists does it take to change a fluorescent light bulb?
A: That wasn't in the training data!
4
I usually find light bulb jokes boring, but this one is cool :D
– Jérémy Blain
Dec 14 at 15:38
@JérémyBlain All the other light bulb jokes were training - we now have to rerun them with this as a model.
– Lio Elbammalf
11 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
26
down vote
Neural Network are not black boxes. They are a big pile of linear algebra :

image from xkcd
1
Ah, yes, there is xkcd about everything!
– val
Dec 14 at 20:47
add a comment |
up vote
10
down vote
If you torture data long enough, it will tell you whatever you want to hear.
Statistics shows that statistics cannot be trusted.
So laconic and true!
– gsamaras
15 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
9
down vote
Frequentists vs. Bayesians
!['Detector! What would the Bayesian statistician say if I asked him whether the--' [roll] 'I AM A NEUTRINO DETECTOR, NOT A LABYRINTH GUARD. SERIOUSLY, DID YOUR BRAIN FALL OUT?' [roll] '... yes.' Frequentists vs. Bayesians – xkcd](https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/frequentists_vs_bayesians.png)
Transcript:
Did the sun just explode?
(It's night, so we're not sure)
[[Two statisticians stand alongside an adorable little computer that is suspiciously similar to K-9 that speaks in Westminster typeface]]
Frequentist Statistician: This neutrino detector measures whether the sun has gone nova.
Bayesian Statistician: Then, it rolls two dice. If they both come up as six, it lies to us. Otherwise, it tells the truth.
FS: Let's try. [[to the detector]] Detector! Has the sun gone nova?
Detector: <<roll>> YES.
Frequentist Statistician:
FS: The probability of this result happening by chance is $frac1{36}=0.027$. Since $p< 0.05$, I conclude that the sun has exploded.
Bayesian Statistician:
BS: Bet you $50 it hasn't.
Title text:
'Detector! What would the Bayesian statistician say if I asked him whether the–' [roll] 'I AM A NEUTRINO DETECTOR, NOT A LABYRINTH GUARD. SERIOUSLY, DID YOUR BRAIN FALL OUT?' [roll] '... yes.'
add a comment |
up vote
9
down vote
I find this funny because it's true.

source
Cute funny...

This one always cracks me up for no reason...

1
But but but, the bar with the large uncertainty is the only one I trust. Who would trust someone who claims to be absolutely sure of everything, rather than the one who rightly puts in a realistic level of uncertainty?
– gerrit
2 days ago
The first one is a twist on XKCD #303 without reference to the source.
– molnarm
14 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote

Unsure whether they qualify, but there are some fun facts taken from various sources:
Beginning from Yann Lecun:
Geoff Hinton doesn't need to make hidden units. They hide by
themselves when he approaches.Geoff Hinton doesn't disagree with you, he contrastively diverges
(from Vincent Vanhoucke)Shakespeare and Bayes are in a boat, fishing. Bayes is trying to figure out which net to cast when Shakespeare says:
"loopy or not loopy? that is the question".Deep Belief Nets actually believe deeply in Geoff Hinton.
Geoff Hinton discovered how the brain really works. Once a year for
the last 25 years.
Bayesians are the only people who can feel marginalized after being integrated
And now the legend:

One from Reddit:
YOLO: you only LEARN once
P.S: Ian Goodfellow and Jurgen Schmidhuber are co-authoring a paper (to be presented at NIPS 2019) on Inverse GANs (More jokes on the topic here)
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote

Let me embrace thee, sour adversity, for wise men say it is the wisest course.
Yann Le Trump! 😂😂😂
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
A: What is machine learning sir?
B: It is not machine learning! It is machine burning, man.

by Davide Mazzini
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
A Machine Learning algorithm walks into a bar.
The bartender asks, "What'll you have?"
The algorithm says, "What's everyone else having?"
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
In 2006, a common joke was that you would get an award for writing a paper that would either have "Karl Marx" or "Neural Network" in the title and get accepted at NIPS. Now that's become the standard for the latter... :D
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "557"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f42621%2fdata-science-related-funny-quotes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
10 Answers
10
active
oldest
votes
10 Answers
10
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
31
down vote
Q: How many machine learning specialists does it take to change a light bulb?
A: Just one, but they require a million light bulbs to train properly.
Q: How many machine learning specialists does it take to change a fluorescent light bulb?
A: That wasn't in the training data!
4
I usually find light bulb jokes boring, but this one is cool :D
– Jérémy Blain
Dec 14 at 15:38
@JérémyBlain All the other light bulb jokes were training - we now have to rerun them with this as a model.
– Lio Elbammalf
11 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
31
down vote
Q: How many machine learning specialists does it take to change a light bulb?
A: Just one, but they require a million light bulbs to train properly.
Q: How many machine learning specialists does it take to change a fluorescent light bulb?
A: That wasn't in the training data!
4
I usually find light bulb jokes boring, but this one is cool :D
– Jérémy Blain
Dec 14 at 15:38
@JérémyBlain All the other light bulb jokes were training - we now have to rerun them with this as a model.
– Lio Elbammalf
11 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
31
down vote
up vote
31
down vote
Q: How many machine learning specialists does it take to change a light bulb?
A: Just one, but they require a million light bulbs to train properly.
Q: How many machine learning specialists does it take to change a fluorescent light bulb?
A: That wasn't in the training data!
Q: How many machine learning specialists does it take to change a light bulb?
A: Just one, but they require a million light bulbs to train properly.
Q: How many machine learning specialists does it take to change a fluorescent light bulb?
A: That wasn't in the training data!
answered Dec 14 at 15:31
community wiki
Nuclear Wang
4
I usually find light bulb jokes boring, but this one is cool :D
– Jérémy Blain
Dec 14 at 15:38
@JérémyBlain All the other light bulb jokes were training - we now have to rerun them with this as a model.
– Lio Elbammalf
11 hours ago
add a comment |
4
I usually find light bulb jokes boring, but this one is cool :D
– Jérémy Blain
Dec 14 at 15:38
@JérémyBlain All the other light bulb jokes were training - we now have to rerun them with this as a model.
– Lio Elbammalf
11 hours ago
4
4
I usually find light bulb jokes boring, but this one is cool :D
– Jérémy Blain
Dec 14 at 15:38
I usually find light bulb jokes boring, but this one is cool :D
– Jérémy Blain
Dec 14 at 15:38
@JérémyBlain All the other light bulb jokes were training - we now have to rerun them with this as a model.
– Lio Elbammalf
11 hours ago
@JérémyBlain All the other light bulb jokes were training - we now have to rerun them with this as a model.
– Lio Elbammalf
11 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
26
down vote
Neural Network are not black boxes. They are a big pile of linear algebra :

image from xkcd
1
Ah, yes, there is xkcd about everything!
– val
Dec 14 at 20:47
add a comment |
up vote
26
down vote
Neural Network are not black boxes. They are a big pile of linear algebra :

image from xkcd
1
Ah, yes, there is xkcd about everything!
– val
Dec 14 at 20:47
add a comment |
up vote
26
down vote
up vote
26
down vote
Neural Network are not black boxes. They are a big pile of linear algebra :

image from xkcd
Neural Network are not black boxes. They are a big pile of linear algebra :

image from xkcd
answered Dec 14 at 15:01
community wiki
Jérémy Blain
1
Ah, yes, there is xkcd about everything!
– val
Dec 14 at 20:47
add a comment |
1
Ah, yes, there is xkcd about everything!
– val
Dec 14 at 20:47
1
1
Ah, yes, there is xkcd about everything!
– val
Dec 14 at 20:47
Ah, yes, there is xkcd about everything!
– val
Dec 14 at 20:47
add a comment |
up vote
10
down vote
If you torture data long enough, it will tell you whatever you want to hear.
Statistics shows that statistics cannot be trusted.
So laconic and true!
– gsamaras
15 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
10
down vote
If you torture data long enough, it will tell you whatever you want to hear.
Statistics shows that statistics cannot be trusted.
So laconic and true!
– gsamaras
15 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
10
down vote
up vote
10
down vote
If you torture data long enough, it will tell you whatever you want to hear.
Statistics shows that statistics cannot be trusted.
If you torture data long enough, it will tell you whatever you want to hear.
Statistics shows that statistics cannot be trusted.
edited 10 hours ago
community wiki
2 revs
sds
So laconic and true!
– gsamaras
15 hours ago
add a comment |
So laconic and true!
– gsamaras
15 hours ago
So laconic and true!
– gsamaras
15 hours ago
So laconic and true!
– gsamaras
15 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
9
down vote
Frequentists vs. Bayesians
!['Detector! What would the Bayesian statistician say if I asked him whether the--' [roll] 'I AM A NEUTRINO DETECTOR, NOT A LABYRINTH GUARD. SERIOUSLY, DID YOUR BRAIN FALL OUT?' [roll] '... yes.' Frequentists vs. Bayesians – xkcd](https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/frequentists_vs_bayesians.png)
Transcript:
Did the sun just explode?
(It's night, so we're not sure)
[[Two statisticians stand alongside an adorable little computer that is suspiciously similar to K-9 that speaks in Westminster typeface]]
Frequentist Statistician: This neutrino detector measures whether the sun has gone nova.
Bayesian Statistician: Then, it rolls two dice. If they both come up as six, it lies to us. Otherwise, it tells the truth.
FS: Let's try. [[to the detector]] Detector! Has the sun gone nova?
Detector: <<roll>> YES.
Frequentist Statistician:
FS: The probability of this result happening by chance is $frac1{36}=0.027$. Since $p< 0.05$, I conclude that the sun has exploded.
Bayesian Statistician:
BS: Bet you $50 it hasn't.
Title text:
'Detector! What would the Bayesian statistician say if I asked him whether the–' [roll] 'I AM A NEUTRINO DETECTOR, NOT A LABYRINTH GUARD. SERIOUSLY, DID YOUR BRAIN FALL OUT?' [roll] '... yes.'
add a comment |
up vote
9
down vote
Frequentists vs. Bayesians
!['Detector! What would the Bayesian statistician say if I asked him whether the--' [roll] 'I AM A NEUTRINO DETECTOR, NOT A LABYRINTH GUARD. SERIOUSLY, DID YOUR BRAIN FALL OUT?' [roll] '... yes.' Frequentists vs. Bayesians – xkcd](https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/frequentists_vs_bayesians.png)
Transcript:
Did the sun just explode?
(It's night, so we're not sure)
[[Two statisticians stand alongside an adorable little computer that is suspiciously similar to K-9 that speaks in Westminster typeface]]
Frequentist Statistician: This neutrino detector measures whether the sun has gone nova.
Bayesian Statistician: Then, it rolls two dice. If they both come up as six, it lies to us. Otherwise, it tells the truth.
FS: Let's try. [[to the detector]] Detector! Has the sun gone nova?
Detector: <<roll>> YES.
Frequentist Statistician:
FS: The probability of this result happening by chance is $frac1{36}=0.027$. Since $p< 0.05$, I conclude that the sun has exploded.
Bayesian Statistician:
BS: Bet you $50 it hasn't.
Title text:
'Detector! What would the Bayesian statistician say if I asked him whether the–' [roll] 'I AM A NEUTRINO DETECTOR, NOT A LABYRINTH GUARD. SERIOUSLY, DID YOUR BRAIN FALL OUT?' [roll] '... yes.'
add a comment |
up vote
9
down vote
up vote
9
down vote
Frequentists vs. Bayesians
!['Detector! What would the Bayesian statistician say if I asked him whether the--' [roll] 'I AM A NEUTRINO DETECTOR, NOT A LABYRINTH GUARD. SERIOUSLY, DID YOUR BRAIN FALL OUT?' [roll] '... yes.' Frequentists vs. Bayesians – xkcd](https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/frequentists_vs_bayesians.png)
Transcript:
Did the sun just explode?
(It's night, so we're not sure)
[[Two statisticians stand alongside an adorable little computer that is suspiciously similar to K-9 that speaks in Westminster typeface]]
Frequentist Statistician: This neutrino detector measures whether the sun has gone nova.
Bayesian Statistician: Then, it rolls two dice. If they both come up as six, it lies to us. Otherwise, it tells the truth.
FS: Let's try. [[to the detector]] Detector! Has the sun gone nova?
Detector: <<roll>> YES.
Frequentist Statistician:
FS: The probability of this result happening by chance is $frac1{36}=0.027$. Since $p< 0.05$, I conclude that the sun has exploded.
Bayesian Statistician:
BS: Bet you $50 it hasn't.
Title text:
'Detector! What would the Bayesian statistician say if I asked him whether the–' [roll] 'I AM A NEUTRINO DETECTOR, NOT A LABYRINTH GUARD. SERIOUSLY, DID YOUR BRAIN FALL OUT?' [roll] '... yes.'
Frequentists vs. Bayesians
!['Detector! What would the Bayesian statistician say if I asked him whether the--' [roll] 'I AM A NEUTRINO DETECTOR, NOT A LABYRINTH GUARD. SERIOUSLY, DID YOUR BRAIN FALL OUT?' [roll] '... yes.' Frequentists vs. Bayesians – xkcd](https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/frequentists_vs_bayesians.png)
Transcript:
Did the sun just explode?
(It's night, so we're not sure)
[[Two statisticians stand alongside an adorable little computer that is suspiciously similar to K-9 that speaks in Westminster typeface]]
Frequentist Statistician: This neutrino detector measures whether the sun has gone nova.
Bayesian Statistician: Then, it rolls two dice. If they both come up as six, it lies to us. Otherwise, it tells the truth.
FS: Let's try. [[to the detector]] Detector! Has the sun gone nova?
Detector: <<roll>> YES.
Frequentist Statistician:
FS: The probability of this result happening by chance is $frac1{36}=0.027$. Since $p< 0.05$, I conclude that the sun has exploded.
Bayesian Statistician:
BS: Bet you $50 it hasn't.
Title text:
'Detector! What would the Bayesian statistician say if I asked him whether the–' [roll] 'I AM A NEUTRINO DETECTOR, NOT A LABYRINTH GUARD. SERIOUSLY, DID YOUR BRAIN FALL OUT?' [roll] '... yes.'
answered Dec 15 at 21:21
community wiki
wizzwizz4
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
9
down vote
I find this funny because it's true.

source
Cute funny...

This one always cracks me up for no reason...

1
But but but, the bar with the large uncertainty is the only one I trust. Who would trust someone who claims to be absolutely sure of everything, rather than the one who rightly puts in a realistic level of uncertainty?
– gerrit
2 days ago
The first one is a twist on XKCD #303 without reference to the source.
– molnarm
14 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
9
down vote
I find this funny because it's true.

source
Cute funny...

This one always cracks me up for no reason...

1
But but but, the bar with the large uncertainty is the only one I trust. Who would trust someone who claims to be absolutely sure of everything, rather than the one who rightly puts in a realistic level of uncertainty?
– gerrit
2 days ago
The first one is a twist on XKCD #303 without reference to the source.
– molnarm
14 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
9
down vote
up vote
9
down vote
I find this funny because it's true.

source
Cute funny...

This one always cracks me up for no reason...

I find this funny because it's true.

source
Cute funny...

This one always cracks me up for no reason...

edited 9 hours ago
community wiki
2 revs
BrunoGL
1
But but but, the bar with the large uncertainty is the only one I trust. Who would trust someone who claims to be absolutely sure of everything, rather than the one who rightly puts in a realistic level of uncertainty?
– gerrit
2 days ago
The first one is a twist on XKCD #303 without reference to the source.
– molnarm
14 hours ago
add a comment |
1
But but but, the bar with the large uncertainty is the only one I trust. Who would trust someone who claims to be absolutely sure of everything, rather than the one who rightly puts in a realistic level of uncertainty?
– gerrit
2 days ago
The first one is a twist on XKCD #303 without reference to the source.
– molnarm
14 hours ago
1
1
But but but, the bar with the large uncertainty is the only one I trust. Who would trust someone who claims to be absolutely sure of everything, rather than the one who rightly puts in a realistic level of uncertainty?
– gerrit
2 days ago
But but but, the bar with the large uncertainty is the only one I trust. Who would trust someone who claims to be absolutely sure of everything, rather than the one who rightly puts in a realistic level of uncertainty?
– gerrit
2 days ago
The first one is a twist on XKCD #303 without reference to the source.
– molnarm
14 hours ago
The first one is a twist on XKCD #303 without reference to the source.
– molnarm
14 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote

Unsure whether they qualify, but there are some fun facts taken from various sources:
Beginning from Yann Lecun:
Geoff Hinton doesn't need to make hidden units. They hide by
themselves when he approaches.Geoff Hinton doesn't disagree with you, he contrastively diverges
(from Vincent Vanhoucke)Shakespeare and Bayes are in a boat, fishing. Bayes is trying to figure out which net to cast when Shakespeare says:
"loopy or not loopy? that is the question".Deep Belief Nets actually believe deeply in Geoff Hinton.
Geoff Hinton discovered how the brain really works. Once a year for
the last 25 years.
Bayesians are the only people who can feel marginalized after being integrated
And now the legend:

One from Reddit:
YOLO: you only LEARN once
P.S: Ian Goodfellow and Jurgen Schmidhuber are co-authoring a paper (to be presented at NIPS 2019) on Inverse GANs (More jokes on the topic here)
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote

Unsure whether they qualify, but there are some fun facts taken from various sources:
Beginning from Yann Lecun:
Geoff Hinton doesn't need to make hidden units. They hide by
themselves when he approaches.Geoff Hinton doesn't disagree with you, he contrastively diverges
(from Vincent Vanhoucke)Shakespeare and Bayes are in a boat, fishing. Bayes is trying to figure out which net to cast when Shakespeare says:
"loopy or not loopy? that is the question".Deep Belief Nets actually believe deeply in Geoff Hinton.
Geoff Hinton discovered how the brain really works. Once a year for
the last 25 years.
Bayesians are the only people who can feel marginalized after being integrated
And now the legend:

One from Reddit:
YOLO: you only LEARN once
P.S: Ian Goodfellow and Jurgen Schmidhuber are co-authoring a paper (to be presented at NIPS 2019) on Inverse GANs (More jokes on the topic here)
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
up vote
5
down vote

Unsure whether they qualify, but there are some fun facts taken from various sources:
Beginning from Yann Lecun:
Geoff Hinton doesn't need to make hidden units. They hide by
themselves when he approaches.Geoff Hinton doesn't disagree with you, he contrastively diverges
(from Vincent Vanhoucke)Shakespeare and Bayes are in a boat, fishing. Bayes is trying to figure out which net to cast when Shakespeare says:
"loopy or not loopy? that is the question".Deep Belief Nets actually believe deeply in Geoff Hinton.
Geoff Hinton discovered how the brain really works. Once a year for
the last 25 years.
Bayesians are the only people who can feel marginalized after being integrated
And now the legend:

One from Reddit:
YOLO: you only LEARN once
P.S: Ian Goodfellow and Jurgen Schmidhuber are co-authoring a paper (to be presented at NIPS 2019) on Inverse GANs (More jokes on the topic here)

Unsure whether they qualify, but there are some fun facts taken from various sources:
Beginning from Yann Lecun:
Geoff Hinton doesn't need to make hidden units. They hide by
themselves when he approaches.Geoff Hinton doesn't disagree with you, he contrastively diverges
(from Vincent Vanhoucke)Shakespeare and Bayes are in a boat, fishing. Bayes is trying to figure out which net to cast when Shakespeare says:
"loopy or not loopy? that is the question".Deep Belief Nets actually believe deeply in Geoff Hinton.
Geoff Hinton discovered how the brain really works. Once a year for
the last 25 years.
Bayesians are the only people who can feel marginalized after being integrated
And now the legend:

One from Reddit:
YOLO: you only LEARN once
P.S: Ian Goodfellow and Jurgen Schmidhuber are co-authoring a paper (to be presented at NIPS 2019) on Inverse GANs (More jokes on the topic here)
answered 2 days ago
community wiki
Failed Scientist
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote

Let me embrace thee, sour adversity, for wise men say it is the wisest course.
Yann Le Trump! 😂😂😂
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote

Let me embrace thee, sour adversity, for wise men say it is the wisest course.
Yann Le Trump! 😂😂😂
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
up vote
4
down vote

Let me embrace thee, sour adversity, for wise men say it is the wisest course.
Yann Le Trump! 😂😂😂

Let me embrace thee, sour adversity, for wise men say it is the wisest course.
Yann Le Trump! 😂😂😂
answered 14 hours ago
community wiki
TitoOrt
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
A: What is machine learning sir?
B: It is not machine learning! It is machine burning, man.

by Davide Mazzini
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
A: What is machine learning sir?
B: It is not machine learning! It is machine burning, man.

by Davide Mazzini
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
A: What is machine learning sir?
B: It is not machine learning! It is machine burning, man.

by Davide Mazzini
A: What is machine learning sir?
B: It is not machine learning! It is machine burning, man.

by Davide Mazzini
edited Dec 14 at 20:17
community wiki
Media
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
A Machine Learning algorithm walks into a bar.
The bartender asks, "What'll you have?"
The algorithm says, "What's everyone else having?"
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
A Machine Learning algorithm walks into a bar.
The bartender asks, "What'll you have?"
The algorithm says, "What's everyone else having?"
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
A Machine Learning algorithm walks into a bar.
The bartender asks, "What'll you have?"
The algorithm says, "What's everyone else having?"
A Machine Learning algorithm walks into a bar.
The bartender asks, "What'll you have?"
The algorithm says, "What's everyone else having?"
answered 15 hours ago
community wiki
gsamaras
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
In 2006, a common joke was that you would get an award for writing a paper that would either have "Karl Marx" or "Neural Network" in the title and get accepted at NIPS. Now that's become the standard for the latter... :D
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
In 2006, a common joke was that you would get an award for writing a paper that would either have "Karl Marx" or "Neural Network" in the title and get accepted at NIPS. Now that's become the standard for the latter... :D
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
In 2006, a common joke was that you would get an award for writing a paper that would either have "Karl Marx" or "Neural Network" in the title and get accepted at NIPS. Now that's become the standard for the latter... :D
In 2006, a common joke was that you would get an award for writing a paper that would either have "Karl Marx" or "Neural Network" in the title and get accepted at NIPS. Now that's become the standard for the latter... :D
answered 2 days ago
community wiki
J. Reinhard
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Data Science Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f42621%2fdata-science-related-funny-quotes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Not quite data science, as it's more data management & archiving, but see youtube.com/watch?v=N2zK3sAtr-4
– Joe
Dec 15 at 23:36
2
I like this, but really, does this belong here? Maybe it's better off on the Meta.
– Mr Lister
2 days ago
1
@MrLister as I've mentioned, you can see this post in other comunities too. It has been just for fun :) don't take that seriously. On the other hand I don't think it is off topic. It is about datascience, isn't it?
– Media
2 days ago
1
related: stats.stackexchange.com/questions/1337/statistics-jokes and stats.stackexchange.com/questions/423/…
– moooeeeep
yesterday
1
How many epochs will we need to find ourselves in an epoch (Hellenic meaning), where the machine learning algorithm can make good jokes, to post here?
– gsamaras
15 hours ago