Data science related funny quotes











up vote
27
down vote

favorite
8












It has been customary for the users of different communities to quote funny things about their fields. It may be fun to share your funny things about Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Data Science and the things that you face every day!










share|improve this question




















  • 1




    Not quite data science, as it's more data management & archiving, but see youtube.com/watch?v=N2zK3sAtr-4
    – Joe
    Dec 15 at 23:36






  • 2




    I like this, but really, does this belong here? Maybe it's better off on the Meta.
    – Mr Lister
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @MrLister as I've mentioned, you can see this post in other comunities too. It has been just for fun :) don't take that seriously. On the other hand I don't think it is off topic. It is about datascience, isn't it?
    – Media
    2 days ago








  • 1




    related: stats.stackexchange.com/questions/1337/statistics-jokes and stats.stackexchange.com/questions/423/…
    – moooeeeep
    yesterday








  • 1




    How many epochs will we need to find ourselves in an epoch (Hellenic meaning), where the machine learning algorithm can make good jokes, to post here?
    – gsamaras
    15 hours ago

















up vote
27
down vote

favorite
8












It has been customary for the users of different communities to quote funny things about their fields. It may be fun to share your funny things about Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Data Science and the things that you face every day!










share|improve this question




















  • 1




    Not quite data science, as it's more data management & archiving, but see youtube.com/watch?v=N2zK3sAtr-4
    – Joe
    Dec 15 at 23:36






  • 2




    I like this, but really, does this belong here? Maybe it's better off on the Meta.
    – Mr Lister
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @MrLister as I've mentioned, you can see this post in other comunities too. It has been just for fun :) don't take that seriously. On the other hand I don't think it is off topic. It is about datascience, isn't it?
    – Media
    2 days ago








  • 1




    related: stats.stackexchange.com/questions/1337/statistics-jokes and stats.stackexchange.com/questions/423/…
    – moooeeeep
    yesterday








  • 1




    How many epochs will we need to find ourselves in an epoch (Hellenic meaning), where the machine learning algorithm can make good jokes, to post here?
    – gsamaras
    15 hours ago















up vote
27
down vote

favorite
8









up vote
27
down vote

favorite
8






8





It has been customary for the users of different communities to quote funny things about their fields. It may be fun to share your funny things about Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Data Science and the things that you face every day!










share|improve this question















It has been customary for the users of different communities to quote funny things about their fields. It may be fun to share your funny things about Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Data Science and the things that you face every day!







machine-learning neural-network deep-learning humor






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 17 hours ago


























community wiki





5 revs, 2 users 70%
Media









  • 1




    Not quite data science, as it's more data management & archiving, but see youtube.com/watch?v=N2zK3sAtr-4
    – Joe
    Dec 15 at 23:36






  • 2




    I like this, but really, does this belong here? Maybe it's better off on the Meta.
    – Mr Lister
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @MrLister as I've mentioned, you can see this post in other comunities too. It has been just for fun :) don't take that seriously. On the other hand I don't think it is off topic. It is about datascience, isn't it?
    – Media
    2 days ago








  • 1




    related: stats.stackexchange.com/questions/1337/statistics-jokes and stats.stackexchange.com/questions/423/…
    – moooeeeep
    yesterday








  • 1




    How many epochs will we need to find ourselves in an epoch (Hellenic meaning), where the machine learning algorithm can make good jokes, to post here?
    – gsamaras
    15 hours ago
















  • 1




    Not quite data science, as it's more data management & archiving, but see youtube.com/watch?v=N2zK3sAtr-4
    – Joe
    Dec 15 at 23:36






  • 2




    I like this, but really, does this belong here? Maybe it's better off on the Meta.
    – Mr Lister
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @MrLister as I've mentioned, you can see this post in other comunities too. It has been just for fun :) don't take that seriously. On the other hand I don't think it is off topic. It is about datascience, isn't it?
    – Media
    2 days ago








  • 1




    related: stats.stackexchange.com/questions/1337/statistics-jokes and stats.stackexchange.com/questions/423/…
    – moooeeeep
    yesterday








  • 1




    How many epochs will we need to find ourselves in an epoch (Hellenic meaning), where the machine learning algorithm can make good jokes, to post here?
    – gsamaras
    15 hours ago










1




1




Not quite data science, as it's more data management & archiving, but see youtube.com/watch?v=N2zK3sAtr-4
– Joe
Dec 15 at 23:36




Not quite data science, as it's more data management & archiving, but see youtube.com/watch?v=N2zK3sAtr-4
– Joe
Dec 15 at 23:36




2




2




I like this, but really, does this belong here? Maybe it's better off on the Meta.
– Mr Lister
2 days ago




I like this, but really, does this belong here? Maybe it's better off on the Meta.
– Mr Lister
2 days ago




1




1




@MrLister as I've mentioned, you can see this post in other comunities too. It has been just for fun :) don't take that seriously. On the other hand I don't think it is off topic. It is about datascience, isn't it?
– Media
2 days ago






@MrLister as I've mentioned, you can see this post in other comunities too. It has been just for fun :) don't take that seriously. On the other hand I don't think it is off topic. It is about datascience, isn't it?
– Media
2 days ago






1




1




related: stats.stackexchange.com/questions/1337/statistics-jokes and stats.stackexchange.com/questions/423/…
– moooeeeep
yesterday






related: stats.stackexchange.com/questions/1337/statistics-jokes and stats.stackexchange.com/questions/423/…
– moooeeeep
yesterday






1




1




How many epochs will we need to find ourselves in an epoch (Hellenic meaning), where the machine learning algorithm can make good jokes, to post here?
– gsamaras
15 hours ago






How many epochs will we need to find ourselves in an epoch (Hellenic meaning), where the machine learning algorithm can make good jokes, to post here?
– gsamaras
15 hours ago












10 Answers
10






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
31
down vote













Q: How many machine learning specialists does it take to change a light bulb?



A: Just one, but they require a million light bulbs to train properly.



Q: How many machine learning specialists does it take to change a fluorescent light bulb?



A: That wasn't in the training data!






share|improve this answer



















  • 4




    I usually find light bulb jokes boring, but this one is cool :D
    – Jérémy Blain
    Dec 14 at 15:38










  • @JérémyBlain All the other light bulb jokes were training - we now have to rerun them with this as a model.
    – Lio Elbammalf
    11 hours ago


















up vote
26
down vote













Neural Network are not black boxes. They are a big pile of linear algebra :



https://xkcd.com/1838/



image from xkcd






share|improve this answer



















  • 1




    Ah, yes, there is xkcd about everything!
    – val
    Dec 14 at 20:47


















up vote
10
down vote














  1. If you torture data long enough, it will tell you whatever you want to hear.


  2. Statistics shows that statistics cannot be trusted.







share|improve this answer























  • So laconic and true!
    – gsamaras
    15 hours ago


















up vote
9
down vote













Frequentists vs. Bayesians



Frequentists vs. Bayesians – xkcd



Transcript:




Did the sun just explode?

(It's night, so we're not sure)



[[Two statisticians stand alongside an adorable little computer that is suspiciously similar to K-9 that speaks in Westminster typeface]]
Frequentist Statistician: This neutrino detector measures whether the sun has gone nova.
Bayesian Statistician: Then, it rolls two dice. If they both come up as six, it lies to us. Otherwise, it tells the truth.
FS: Let's try. [[to the detector]] Detector! Has the sun gone nova?
Detector: <<roll>> YES.



Frequentist Statistician:
FS: The probability of this result happening by chance is $frac1{36}=0.027$. Since $p< 0.05$, I conclude that the sun has exploded.



Bayesian Statistician:
BS: Bet you $50 it hasn't.




Title text:




'Detector! What would the Bayesian statistician say if I asked him whether the–' [roll] 'I AM A NEUTRINO DETECTOR, NOT A LABYRINTH GUARD. SERIOUSLY, DID YOUR BRAIN FALL OUT?' [roll] '... yes.'







share|improve this answer






























    up vote
    9
    down vote













    I find this funny because it's true.



    enter image description here



    source





    Cute funny...



    enter image description here





    This one always cracks me up for no reason...



    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer



















    • 1




      But but but, the bar with the large uncertainty is the only one I trust. Who would trust someone who claims to be absolutely sure of everything, rather than the one who rightly puts in a realistic level of uncertainty?
      – gerrit
      2 days ago










    • The first one is a twist on XKCD #303 without reference to the source.
      – molnarm
      14 hours ago


















    up vote
    5
    down vote













    enter image description here



    Unsure whether they qualify, but there are some fun facts taken from various sources:



    Beginning from Yann Lecun:




    • Geoff Hinton doesn't need to make hidden units. They hide by
      themselves when he approaches.


    • Geoff Hinton doesn't disagree with you, he contrastively diverges

      (from Vincent Vanhoucke)


    • Shakespeare and Bayes are in a boat, fishing. Bayes is trying to figure out which net to cast when Shakespeare says:
      "loopy or not loopy? that is the question".


    • Deep Belief Nets actually believe deeply in Geoff Hinton.


    • Geoff Hinton discovered how the brain really works. Once a year for

      the last 25 years.



    • Bayesians are the only people who can feel marginalized after being integrated



      And now the legend:



      enter image description here




    One from Reddit:



    YOLO: you only LEARN once



    P.S: Ian Goodfellow and Jurgen Schmidhuber are co-authoring a paper (to be presented at NIPS 2019) on Inverse GANs (More jokes on the topic here)






    share|improve this answer






























      up vote
      4
      down vote













      Trump



      Let me embrace thee, sour adversity, for wise men say it is the wisest course.



      Yann Le Trump! 😂😂😂






      share|improve this answer






























        up vote
        2
        down vote













        A: What is machine learning sir?
        B: It is not machine learning! It is machine burning, man.





        enter image description here



        by Davide Mazzini






        share|improve this answer






























          up vote
          2
          down vote













          A Machine Learning algorithm walks into a bar.



          The bartender asks, "What'll you have?"



          The algorithm says, "What's everyone else having?"






          share|improve this answer






























            up vote
            1
            down vote













            In 2006, a common joke was that you would get an award for writing a paper that would either have "Karl Marx" or "Neural Network" in the title and get accepted at NIPS. Now that's become the standard for the latter... :D






            share|improve this answer























              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "557"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f42621%2fdata-science-related-funny-quotes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              10 Answers
              10






              active

              oldest

              votes








              10 Answers
              10






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes








              up vote
              31
              down vote













              Q: How many machine learning specialists does it take to change a light bulb?



              A: Just one, but they require a million light bulbs to train properly.



              Q: How many machine learning specialists does it take to change a fluorescent light bulb?



              A: That wasn't in the training data!






              share|improve this answer



















              • 4




                I usually find light bulb jokes boring, but this one is cool :D
                – Jérémy Blain
                Dec 14 at 15:38










              • @JérémyBlain All the other light bulb jokes were training - we now have to rerun them with this as a model.
                – Lio Elbammalf
                11 hours ago















              up vote
              31
              down vote













              Q: How many machine learning specialists does it take to change a light bulb?



              A: Just one, but they require a million light bulbs to train properly.



              Q: How many machine learning specialists does it take to change a fluorescent light bulb?



              A: That wasn't in the training data!






              share|improve this answer



















              • 4




                I usually find light bulb jokes boring, but this one is cool :D
                – Jérémy Blain
                Dec 14 at 15:38










              • @JérémyBlain All the other light bulb jokes were training - we now have to rerun them with this as a model.
                – Lio Elbammalf
                11 hours ago













              up vote
              31
              down vote










              up vote
              31
              down vote









              Q: How many machine learning specialists does it take to change a light bulb?



              A: Just one, but they require a million light bulbs to train properly.



              Q: How many machine learning specialists does it take to change a fluorescent light bulb?



              A: That wasn't in the training data!






              share|improve this answer














              Q: How many machine learning specialists does it take to change a light bulb?



              A: Just one, but they require a million light bulbs to train properly.



              Q: How many machine learning specialists does it take to change a fluorescent light bulb?



              A: That wasn't in the training data!







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              answered Dec 14 at 15:31


























              community wiki





              Nuclear Wang









              • 4




                I usually find light bulb jokes boring, but this one is cool :D
                – Jérémy Blain
                Dec 14 at 15:38










              • @JérémyBlain All the other light bulb jokes were training - we now have to rerun them with this as a model.
                – Lio Elbammalf
                11 hours ago














              • 4




                I usually find light bulb jokes boring, but this one is cool :D
                – Jérémy Blain
                Dec 14 at 15:38










              • @JérémyBlain All the other light bulb jokes were training - we now have to rerun them with this as a model.
                – Lio Elbammalf
                11 hours ago








              4




              4




              I usually find light bulb jokes boring, but this one is cool :D
              – Jérémy Blain
              Dec 14 at 15:38




              I usually find light bulb jokes boring, but this one is cool :D
              – Jérémy Blain
              Dec 14 at 15:38












              @JérémyBlain All the other light bulb jokes were training - we now have to rerun them with this as a model.
              – Lio Elbammalf
              11 hours ago




              @JérémyBlain All the other light bulb jokes were training - we now have to rerun them with this as a model.
              – Lio Elbammalf
              11 hours ago










              up vote
              26
              down vote













              Neural Network are not black boxes. They are a big pile of linear algebra :



              https://xkcd.com/1838/



              image from xkcd






              share|improve this answer



















              • 1




                Ah, yes, there is xkcd about everything!
                – val
                Dec 14 at 20:47















              up vote
              26
              down vote













              Neural Network are not black boxes. They are a big pile of linear algebra :



              https://xkcd.com/1838/



              image from xkcd






              share|improve this answer



















              • 1




                Ah, yes, there is xkcd about everything!
                – val
                Dec 14 at 20:47













              up vote
              26
              down vote










              up vote
              26
              down vote









              Neural Network are not black boxes. They are a big pile of linear algebra :



              https://xkcd.com/1838/



              image from xkcd






              share|improve this answer














              Neural Network are not black boxes. They are a big pile of linear algebra :



              https://xkcd.com/1838/



              image from xkcd







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              answered Dec 14 at 15:01


























              community wiki





              Jérémy Blain









              • 1




                Ah, yes, there is xkcd about everything!
                – val
                Dec 14 at 20:47














              • 1




                Ah, yes, there is xkcd about everything!
                – val
                Dec 14 at 20:47








              1




              1




              Ah, yes, there is xkcd about everything!
              – val
              Dec 14 at 20:47




              Ah, yes, there is xkcd about everything!
              – val
              Dec 14 at 20:47










              up vote
              10
              down vote














              1. If you torture data long enough, it will tell you whatever you want to hear.


              2. Statistics shows that statistics cannot be trusted.







              share|improve this answer























              • So laconic and true!
                – gsamaras
                15 hours ago















              up vote
              10
              down vote














              1. If you torture data long enough, it will tell you whatever you want to hear.


              2. Statistics shows that statistics cannot be trusted.







              share|improve this answer























              • So laconic and true!
                – gsamaras
                15 hours ago













              up vote
              10
              down vote










              up vote
              10
              down vote










              1. If you torture data long enough, it will tell you whatever you want to hear.


              2. Statistics shows that statistics cannot be trusted.







              share|improve this answer















              1. If you torture data long enough, it will tell you whatever you want to hear.


              2. Statistics shows that statistics cannot be trusted.








              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited 10 hours ago


























              community wiki





              2 revs
              sds













              • So laconic and true!
                – gsamaras
                15 hours ago


















              • So laconic and true!
                – gsamaras
                15 hours ago
















              So laconic and true!
              – gsamaras
              15 hours ago




              So laconic and true!
              – gsamaras
              15 hours ago










              up vote
              9
              down vote













              Frequentists vs. Bayesians



              Frequentists vs. Bayesians – xkcd



              Transcript:




              Did the sun just explode?

              (It's night, so we're not sure)



              [[Two statisticians stand alongside an adorable little computer that is suspiciously similar to K-9 that speaks in Westminster typeface]]
              Frequentist Statistician: This neutrino detector measures whether the sun has gone nova.
              Bayesian Statistician: Then, it rolls two dice. If they both come up as six, it lies to us. Otherwise, it tells the truth.
              FS: Let's try. [[to the detector]] Detector! Has the sun gone nova?
              Detector: <<roll>> YES.



              Frequentist Statistician:
              FS: The probability of this result happening by chance is $frac1{36}=0.027$. Since $p< 0.05$, I conclude that the sun has exploded.



              Bayesian Statistician:
              BS: Bet you $50 it hasn't.




              Title text:




              'Detector! What would the Bayesian statistician say if I asked him whether the–' [roll] 'I AM A NEUTRINO DETECTOR, NOT A LABYRINTH GUARD. SERIOUSLY, DID YOUR BRAIN FALL OUT?' [roll] '... yes.'







              share|improve this answer



























                up vote
                9
                down vote













                Frequentists vs. Bayesians



                Frequentists vs. Bayesians – xkcd



                Transcript:




                Did the sun just explode?

                (It's night, so we're not sure)



                [[Two statisticians stand alongside an adorable little computer that is suspiciously similar to K-9 that speaks in Westminster typeface]]
                Frequentist Statistician: This neutrino detector measures whether the sun has gone nova.
                Bayesian Statistician: Then, it rolls two dice. If they both come up as six, it lies to us. Otherwise, it tells the truth.
                FS: Let's try. [[to the detector]] Detector! Has the sun gone nova?
                Detector: <<roll>> YES.



                Frequentist Statistician:
                FS: The probability of this result happening by chance is $frac1{36}=0.027$. Since $p< 0.05$, I conclude that the sun has exploded.



                Bayesian Statistician:
                BS: Bet you $50 it hasn't.




                Title text:




                'Detector! What would the Bayesian statistician say if I asked him whether the–' [roll] 'I AM A NEUTRINO DETECTOR, NOT A LABYRINTH GUARD. SERIOUSLY, DID YOUR BRAIN FALL OUT?' [roll] '... yes.'







                share|improve this answer

























                  up vote
                  9
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  9
                  down vote









                  Frequentists vs. Bayesians



                  Frequentists vs. Bayesians – xkcd



                  Transcript:




                  Did the sun just explode?

                  (It's night, so we're not sure)



                  [[Two statisticians stand alongside an adorable little computer that is suspiciously similar to K-9 that speaks in Westminster typeface]]
                  Frequentist Statistician: This neutrino detector measures whether the sun has gone nova.
                  Bayesian Statistician: Then, it rolls two dice. If they both come up as six, it lies to us. Otherwise, it tells the truth.
                  FS: Let's try. [[to the detector]] Detector! Has the sun gone nova?
                  Detector: <<roll>> YES.



                  Frequentist Statistician:
                  FS: The probability of this result happening by chance is $frac1{36}=0.027$. Since $p< 0.05$, I conclude that the sun has exploded.



                  Bayesian Statistician:
                  BS: Bet you $50 it hasn't.




                  Title text:




                  'Detector! What would the Bayesian statistician say if I asked him whether the–' [roll] 'I AM A NEUTRINO DETECTOR, NOT A LABYRINTH GUARD. SERIOUSLY, DID YOUR BRAIN FALL OUT?' [roll] '... yes.'







                  share|improve this answer














                  Frequentists vs. Bayesians



                  Frequentists vs. Bayesians – xkcd



                  Transcript:




                  Did the sun just explode?

                  (It's night, so we're not sure)



                  [[Two statisticians stand alongside an adorable little computer that is suspiciously similar to K-9 that speaks in Westminster typeface]]
                  Frequentist Statistician: This neutrino detector measures whether the sun has gone nova.
                  Bayesian Statistician: Then, it rolls two dice. If they both come up as six, it lies to us. Otherwise, it tells the truth.
                  FS: Let's try. [[to the detector]] Detector! Has the sun gone nova?
                  Detector: <<roll>> YES.



                  Frequentist Statistician:
                  FS: The probability of this result happening by chance is $frac1{36}=0.027$. Since $p< 0.05$, I conclude that the sun has exploded.



                  Bayesian Statistician:
                  BS: Bet you $50 it hasn't.




                  Title text:




                  'Detector! What would the Bayesian statistician say if I asked him whether the–' [roll] 'I AM A NEUTRINO DETECTOR, NOT A LABYRINTH GUARD. SERIOUSLY, DID YOUR BRAIN FALL OUT?' [roll] '... yes.'








                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  answered Dec 15 at 21:21


























                  community wiki





                  wizzwizz4























                      up vote
                      9
                      down vote













                      I find this funny because it's true.



                      enter image description here



                      source





                      Cute funny...



                      enter image description here





                      This one always cracks me up for no reason...



                      enter image description here






                      share|improve this answer



















                      • 1




                        But but but, the bar with the large uncertainty is the only one I trust. Who would trust someone who claims to be absolutely sure of everything, rather than the one who rightly puts in a realistic level of uncertainty?
                        – gerrit
                        2 days ago










                      • The first one is a twist on XKCD #303 without reference to the source.
                        – molnarm
                        14 hours ago















                      up vote
                      9
                      down vote













                      I find this funny because it's true.



                      enter image description here



                      source





                      Cute funny...



                      enter image description here





                      This one always cracks me up for no reason...



                      enter image description here






                      share|improve this answer



















                      • 1




                        But but but, the bar with the large uncertainty is the only one I trust. Who would trust someone who claims to be absolutely sure of everything, rather than the one who rightly puts in a realistic level of uncertainty?
                        – gerrit
                        2 days ago










                      • The first one is a twist on XKCD #303 without reference to the source.
                        – molnarm
                        14 hours ago













                      up vote
                      9
                      down vote










                      up vote
                      9
                      down vote









                      I find this funny because it's true.



                      enter image description here



                      source





                      Cute funny...



                      enter image description here





                      This one always cracks me up for no reason...



                      enter image description here






                      share|improve this answer














                      I find this funny because it's true.



                      enter image description here



                      source





                      Cute funny...



                      enter image description here





                      This one always cracks me up for no reason...



                      enter image description here







                      share|improve this answer














                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited 9 hours ago


























                      community wiki





                      2 revs
                      BrunoGL









                      • 1




                        But but but, the bar with the large uncertainty is the only one I trust. Who would trust someone who claims to be absolutely sure of everything, rather than the one who rightly puts in a realistic level of uncertainty?
                        – gerrit
                        2 days ago










                      • The first one is a twist on XKCD #303 without reference to the source.
                        – molnarm
                        14 hours ago














                      • 1




                        But but but, the bar with the large uncertainty is the only one I trust. Who would trust someone who claims to be absolutely sure of everything, rather than the one who rightly puts in a realistic level of uncertainty?
                        – gerrit
                        2 days ago










                      • The first one is a twist on XKCD #303 without reference to the source.
                        – molnarm
                        14 hours ago








                      1




                      1




                      But but but, the bar with the large uncertainty is the only one I trust. Who would trust someone who claims to be absolutely sure of everything, rather than the one who rightly puts in a realistic level of uncertainty?
                      – gerrit
                      2 days ago




                      But but but, the bar with the large uncertainty is the only one I trust. Who would trust someone who claims to be absolutely sure of everything, rather than the one who rightly puts in a realistic level of uncertainty?
                      – gerrit
                      2 days ago












                      The first one is a twist on XKCD #303 without reference to the source.
                      – molnarm
                      14 hours ago




                      The first one is a twist on XKCD #303 without reference to the source.
                      – molnarm
                      14 hours ago










                      up vote
                      5
                      down vote













                      enter image description here



                      Unsure whether they qualify, but there are some fun facts taken from various sources:



                      Beginning from Yann Lecun:




                      • Geoff Hinton doesn't need to make hidden units. They hide by
                        themselves when he approaches.


                      • Geoff Hinton doesn't disagree with you, he contrastively diverges

                        (from Vincent Vanhoucke)


                      • Shakespeare and Bayes are in a boat, fishing. Bayes is trying to figure out which net to cast when Shakespeare says:
                        "loopy or not loopy? that is the question".


                      • Deep Belief Nets actually believe deeply in Geoff Hinton.


                      • Geoff Hinton discovered how the brain really works. Once a year for

                        the last 25 years.



                      • Bayesians are the only people who can feel marginalized after being integrated



                        And now the legend:



                        enter image description here




                      One from Reddit:



                      YOLO: you only LEARN once



                      P.S: Ian Goodfellow and Jurgen Schmidhuber are co-authoring a paper (to be presented at NIPS 2019) on Inverse GANs (More jokes on the topic here)






                      share|improve this answer



























                        up vote
                        5
                        down vote













                        enter image description here



                        Unsure whether they qualify, but there are some fun facts taken from various sources:



                        Beginning from Yann Lecun:




                        • Geoff Hinton doesn't need to make hidden units. They hide by
                          themselves when he approaches.


                        • Geoff Hinton doesn't disagree with you, he contrastively diverges

                          (from Vincent Vanhoucke)


                        • Shakespeare and Bayes are in a boat, fishing. Bayes is trying to figure out which net to cast when Shakespeare says:
                          "loopy or not loopy? that is the question".


                        • Deep Belief Nets actually believe deeply in Geoff Hinton.


                        • Geoff Hinton discovered how the brain really works. Once a year for

                          the last 25 years.



                        • Bayesians are the only people who can feel marginalized after being integrated



                          And now the legend:



                          enter image description here




                        One from Reddit:



                        YOLO: you only LEARN once



                        P.S: Ian Goodfellow and Jurgen Schmidhuber are co-authoring a paper (to be presented at NIPS 2019) on Inverse GANs (More jokes on the topic here)






                        share|improve this answer

























                          up vote
                          5
                          down vote










                          up vote
                          5
                          down vote









                          enter image description here



                          Unsure whether they qualify, but there are some fun facts taken from various sources:



                          Beginning from Yann Lecun:




                          • Geoff Hinton doesn't need to make hidden units. They hide by
                            themselves when he approaches.


                          • Geoff Hinton doesn't disagree with you, he contrastively diverges

                            (from Vincent Vanhoucke)


                          • Shakespeare and Bayes are in a boat, fishing. Bayes is trying to figure out which net to cast when Shakespeare says:
                            "loopy or not loopy? that is the question".


                          • Deep Belief Nets actually believe deeply in Geoff Hinton.


                          • Geoff Hinton discovered how the brain really works. Once a year for

                            the last 25 years.



                          • Bayesians are the only people who can feel marginalized after being integrated



                            And now the legend:



                            enter image description here




                          One from Reddit:



                          YOLO: you only LEARN once



                          P.S: Ian Goodfellow and Jurgen Schmidhuber are co-authoring a paper (to be presented at NIPS 2019) on Inverse GANs (More jokes on the topic here)






                          share|improve this answer














                          enter image description here



                          Unsure whether they qualify, but there are some fun facts taken from various sources:



                          Beginning from Yann Lecun:




                          • Geoff Hinton doesn't need to make hidden units. They hide by
                            themselves when he approaches.


                          • Geoff Hinton doesn't disagree with you, he contrastively diverges

                            (from Vincent Vanhoucke)


                          • Shakespeare and Bayes are in a boat, fishing. Bayes is trying to figure out which net to cast when Shakespeare says:
                            "loopy or not loopy? that is the question".


                          • Deep Belief Nets actually believe deeply in Geoff Hinton.


                          • Geoff Hinton discovered how the brain really works. Once a year for

                            the last 25 years.



                          • Bayesians are the only people who can feel marginalized after being integrated



                            And now the legend:



                            enter image description here




                          One from Reddit:



                          YOLO: you only LEARN once



                          P.S: Ian Goodfellow and Jurgen Schmidhuber are co-authoring a paper (to be presented at NIPS 2019) on Inverse GANs (More jokes on the topic here)







                          share|improve this answer














                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer








                          answered 2 days ago


























                          community wiki





                          Failed Scientist























                              up vote
                              4
                              down vote













                              Trump



                              Let me embrace thee, sour adversity, for wise men say it is the wisest course.



                              Yann Le Trump! 😂😂😂






                              share|improve this answer



























                                up vote
                                4
                                down vote













                                Trump



                                Let me embrace thee, sour adversity, for wise men say it is the wisest course.



                                Yann Le Trump! 😂😂😂






                                share|improve this answer

























                                  up vote
                                  4
                                  down vote










                                  up vote
                                  4
                                  down vote









                                  Trump



                                  Let me embrace thee, sour adversity, for wise men say it is the wisest course.



                                  Yann Le Trump! 😂😂😂






                                  share|improve this answer














                                  Trump



                                  Let me embrace thee, sour adversity, for wise men say it is the wisest course.



                                  Yann Le Trump! 😂😂😂







                                  share|improve this answer














                                  share|improve this answer



                                  share|improve this answer








                                  answered 14 hours ago


























                                  community wiki





                                  TitoOrt























                                      up vote
                                      2
                                      down vote













                                      A: What is machine learning sir?
                                      B: It is not machine learning! It is machine burning, man.





                                      enter image description here



                                      by Davide Mazzini






                                      share|improve this answer



























                                        up vote
                                        2
                                        down vote













                                        A: What is machine learning sir?
                                        B: It is not machine learning! It is machine burning, man.





                                        enter image description here



                                        by Davide Mazzini






                                        share|improve this answer

























                                          up vote
                                          2
                                          down vote










                                          up vote
                                          2
                                          down vote









                                          A: What is machine learning sir?
                                          B: It is not machine learning! It is machine burning, man.





                                          enter image description here



                                          by Davide Mazzini






                                          share|improve this answer














                                          A: What is machine learning sir?
                                          B: It is not machine learning! It is machine burning, man.





                                          enter image description here



                                          by Davide Mazzini







                                          share|improve this answer














                                          share|improve this answer



                                          share|improve this answer








                                          edited Dec 14 at 20:17


























                                          community wiki





                                          Media























                                              up vote
                                              2
                                              down vote













                                              A Machine Learning algorithm walks into a bar.



                                              The bartender asks, "What'll you have?"



                                              The algorithm says, "What's everyone else having?"






                                              share|improve this answer



























                                                up vote
                                                2
                                                down vote













                                                A Machine Learning algorithm walks into a bar.



                                                The bartender asks, "What'll you have?"



                                                The algorithm says, "What's everyone else having?"






                                                share|improve this answer

























                                                  up vote
                                                  2
                                                  down vote










                                                  up vote
                                                  2
                                                  down vote









                                                  A Machine Learning algorithm walks into a bar.



                                                  The bartender asks, "What'll you have?"



                                                  The algorithm says, "What's everyone else having?"






                                                  share|improve this answer














                                                  A Machine Learning algorithm walks into a bar.



                                                  The bartender asks, "What'll you have?"



                                                  The algorithm says, "What's everyone else having?"







                                                  share|improve this answer














                                                  share|improve this answer



                                                  share|improve this answer








                                                  answered 15 hours ago


























                                                  community wiki





                                                  gsamaras























                                                      up vote
                                                      1
                                                      down vote













                                                      In 2006, a common joke was that you would get an award for writing a paper that would either have "Karl Marx" or "Neural Network" in the title and get accepted at NIPS. Now that's become the standard for the latter... :D






                                                      share|improve this answer



























                                                        up vote
                                                        1
                                                        down vote













                                                        In 2006, a common joke was that you would get an award for writing a paper that would either have "Karl Marx" or "Neural Network" in the title and get accepted at NIPS. Now that's become the standard for the latter... :D






                                                        share|improve this answer

























                                                          up vote
                                                          1
                                                          down vote










                                                          up vote
                                                          1
                                                          down vote









                                                          In 2006, a common joke was that you would get an award for writing a paper that would either have "Karl Marx" or "Neural Network" in the title and get accepted at NIPS. Now that's become the standard for the latter... :D






                                                          share|improve this answer














                                                          In 2006, a common joke was that you would get an award for writing a paper that would either have "Karl Marx" or "Neural Network" in the title and get accepted at NIPS. Now that's become the standard for the latter... :D







                                                          share|improve this answer














                                                          share|improve this answer



                                                          share|improve this answer








                                                          answered 2 days ago


























                                                          community wiki





                                                          J. Reinhard































                                                              draft saved

                                                              draft discarded




















































                                                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Data Science Stack Exchange!


                                                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                                              But avoid



                                                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                                                              Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                                                              Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                                                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                                              But avoid



                                                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                                              draft saved


                                                              draft discarded














                                                              StackExchange.ready(
                                                              function () {
                                                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f42621%2fdata-science-related-funny-quotes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                                              }
                                                              );

                                                              Post as a guest















                                                              Required, but never shown





















































                                                              Required, but never shown














                                                              Required, but never shown












                                                              Required, but never shown







                                                              Required, but never shown

































                                                              Required, but never shown














                                                              Required, but never shown












                                                              Required, but never shown







                                                              Required, but never shown