Is the action “had ever” understandable











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












What is the correct use "had ever" or "have never" tried it? Are both acceptable? The quote my question comes from is, "Marijuana use seems to be hovering, with about 36 percent of students saying they had ever tried it." "Had ever" just doesn't seem to come together correctly.










share|improve this question






















  • Possible duplicate of Use of “ever” in non-negated sentence. Only Tolkien seems to have broken its negative-polarity status acceptably in recent-ish years. You need 'only' before 'about 36%'. And ' ... have ever ...'.
    – Edwin Ashworth
    Jun 17 at 23:35

















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












What is the correct use "had ever" or "have never" tried it? Are both acceptable? The quote my question comes from is, "Marijuana use seems to be hovering, with about 36 percent of students saying they had ever tried it." "Had ever" just doesn't seem to come together correctly.










share|improve this question






















  • Possible duplicate of Use of “ever” in non-negated sentence. Only Tolkien seems to have broken its negative-polarity status acceptably in recent-ish years. You need 'only' before 'about 36%'. And ' ... have ever ...'.
    – Edwin Ashworth
    Jun 17 at 23:35















up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











What is the correct use "had ever" or "have never" tried it? Are both acceptable? The quote my question comes from is, "Marijuana use seems to be hovering, with about 36 percent of students saying they had ever tried it." "Had ever" just doesn't seem to come together correctly.










share|improve this question













What is the correct use "had ever" or "have never" tried it? Are both acceptable? The quote my question comes from is, "Marijuana use seems to be hovering, with about 36 percent of students saying they had ever tried it." "Had ever" just doesn't seem to come together correctly.







tenses






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Jun 17 at 23:32









MJP

6




6












  • Possible duplicate of Use of “ever” in non-negated sentence. Only Tolkien seems to have broken its negative-polarity status acceptably in recent-ish years. You need 'only' before 'about 36%'. And ' ... have ever ...'.
    – Edwin Ashworth
    Jun 17 at 23:35




















  • Possible duplicate of Use of “ever” in non-negated sentence. Only Tolkien seems to have broken its negative-polarity status acceptably in recent-ish years. You need 'only' before 'about 36%'. And ' ... have ever ...'.
    – Edwin Ashworth
    Jun 17 at 23:35


















Possible duplicate of Use of “ever” in non-negated sentence. Only Tolkien seems to have broken its negative-polarity status acceptably in recent-ish years. You need 'only' before 'about 36%'. And ' ... have ever ...'.
– Edwin Ashworth
Jun 17 at 23:35






Possible duplicate of Use of “ever” in non-negated sentence. Only Tolkien seems to have broken its negative-polarity status acceptably in recent-ish years. You need 'only' before 'about 36%'. And ' ... have ever ...'.
– Edwin Ashworth
Jun 17 at 23:35












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote













'Ever' is not needed in the sentence after 'had'.




Marijuana use seems to be hovering, with about 36 percent of students
saying they had tried it.




Alternatively the negative of the sentence would use 'had never'




Marijuana use seems to be hovering, with about 64 percent of students
saying they had never tried it.







share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    If you had ever stopped to consider this closely, you would realize that the construction sometimes is quite commonplace and unobjectionable.
    – Robusto
    Oct 16 at 22:34











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f450777%2fis-the-action-had-ever-understandable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
0
down vote













'Ever' is not needed in the sentence after 'had'.




Marijuana use seems to be hovering, with about 36 percent of students
saying they had tried it.




Alternatively the negative of the sentence would use 'had never'




Marijuana use seems to be hovering, with about 64 percent of students
saying they had never tried it.







share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    If you had ever stopped to consider this closely, you would realize that the construction sometimes is quite commonplace and unobjectionable.
    – Robusto
    Oct 16 at 22:34















up vote
0
down vote













'Ever' is not needed in the sentence after 'had'.




Marijuana use seems to be hovering, with about 36 percent of students
saying they had tried it.




Alternatively the negative of the sentence would use 'had never'




Marijuana use seems to be hovering, with about 64 percent of students
saying they had never tried it.







share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    If you had ever stopped to consider this closely, you would realize that the construction sometimes is quite commonplace and unobjectionable.
    – Robusto
    Oct 16 at 22:34













up vote
0
down vote










up vote
0
down vote









'Ever' is not needed in the sentence after 'had'.




Marijuana use seems to be hovering, with about 36 percent of students
saying they had tried it.




Alternatively the negative of the sentence would use 'had never'




Marijuana use seems to be hovering, with about 64 percent of students
saying they had never tried it.







share|improve this answer












'Ever' is not needed in the sentence after 'had'.




Marijuana use seems to be hovering, with about 36 percent of students
saying they had tried it.




Alternatively the negative of the sentence would use 'had never'




Marijuana use seems to be hovering, with about 64 percent of students
saying they had never tried it.








share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Jun 17 at 23:39









Manhatton

525110




525110








  • 1




    If you had ever stopped to consider this closely, you would realize that the construction sometimes is quite commonplace and unobjectionable.
    – Robusto
    Oct 16 at 22:34














  • 1




    If you had ever stopped to consider this closely, you would realize that the construction sometimes is quite commonplace and unobjectionable.
    – Robusto
    Oct 16 at 22:34








1




1




If you had ever stopped to consider this closely, you would realize that the construction sometimes is quite commonplace and unobjectionable.
– Robusto
Oct 16 at 22:34




If you had ever stopped to consider this closely, you would realize that the construction sometimes is quite commonplace and unobjectionable.
– Robusto
Oct 16 at 22:34


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f450777%2fis-the-action-had-ever-understandable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

Alcedinidae

Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]