Does a Drow enemy’s poison expire if you wait 1 minute?












18












$begingroup$


In the PHB, when you apply poison on an arrow or a sword, the poison stays effective for 1 minute.



When a Drow hits someone with their crossbow, according to the Monster Manual, that person needs to make a save because of the Drow Poison.



But if you follow that drow for more than 1 minute, will the Drow poison lose its efficacy?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    18












    $begingroup$


    In the PHB, when you apply poison on an arrow or a sword, the poison stays effective for 1 minute.



    When a Drow hits someone with their crossbow, according to the Monster Manual, that person needs to make a save because of the Drow Poison.



    But if you follow that drow for more than 1 minute, will the Drow poison lose its efficacy?










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      18












      18








      18





      $begingroup$


      In the PHB, when you apply poison on an arrow or a sword, the poison stays effective for 1 minute.



      When a Drow hits someone with their crossbow, according to the Monster Manual, that person needs to make a save because of the Drow Poison.



      But if you follow that drow for more than 1 minute, will the Drow poison lose its efficacy?










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      In the PHB, when you apply poison on an arrow or a sword, the poison stays effective for 1 minute.



      When a Drow hits someone with their crossbow, according to the Monster Manual, that person needs to make a save because of the Drow Poison.



      But if you follow that drow for more than 1 minute, will the Drow poison lose its efficacy?







      dnd-5e monsters poison






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 2 days ago









      Sdjz

      11.4k45497




      11.4k45497










      asked 2 days ago









      StrangeGuyStrangeGuy

      12614




      12614






















          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          32












          $begingroup$

          The Drow would still deal poison damage after a minute



          Creature statblocks only do what they say they do. In the statblock for a Drow, they are listed as having a crossbow attack that targets must save against or be poisoned. There's no mention of poison needing to be actively applied to maintain this effect, or of the Drow even having a supply of poisons on-hand.



          DMs can adjudicate the application of a Drow's poison, as a houserule/rule of fun



          Personally, as DM, if I knew a creature's poison attacks were probably caused by a manually applied poison, I'd probably narrate that the poison is applied on either the first round of combat, or in an ambush scenario (which is traditionally where Drow show up in combat) they'd have applied it right before combat began. Alternatively, if the PCs were to get the drop on the Drow, it might be that the Drow have to choose between fighting without poison, or wasting their first turn applying poison.



          One thing to note, however, is that the one minute limit on the poison duration only applies to Player Characters; it is not required to apply to NPCs of any kind. And as DM, you're not required to apply any kind of adjudication on this topic at all: if a statblock says the creature deals poison damage, then they deal poison damage, with no requirement to take into consideration other factors like time or circumstances.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 1




            $begingroup$
            A DM can always adjudicate differently, but the stat block just gives the damage (which includes poison) and does not state anywhere the need for the drow to apply it. Adjudicating application seems like a houserule (which is fine, but should be clear that it's not following the monster stat block)
            $endgroup$
            – NautArch
            2 days ago










          • $begingroup$
            @NautArch Yeah, I've been adding edits to make that a bit clearer. I realized that the original draft was probably a bit too loose in that regard.
            $endgroup$
            – Xirema
            2 days ago






          • 2




            $begingroup$
            Also, if a DM does create a houserule on this, it may change the CR of the drow. May being the operative word :)
            $endgroup$
            – NautArch
            2 days ago



















          19












          $begingroup$

          No, because the drow is counted as an NPC, and therefore, follows different rules than a player character. The drow poison is not specified to be something that the drow must apply to their weaponry; it is an inherent part of the effects of the weaponry used by the drow.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            7












            $begingroup$

            We're looking at two different kinds of poison.



            The basic poison described in the PHB deals an extra 1d4 poison damage to an affected creature, and it dries out and becomes useless after a minute.



            The drow poison used by the drow in the Monster Manual doesn't deal extra damage: It inflicts the poisoned condition and, sometimes, the unconscious condition.



            We know that it's called "drow poison" because it's in the Dungeon Master's Guide (page 256)—where it's described as having the same effects listed in the drow stats. There are bunch of other poisons listed in the same section, including purple worm poison, truth serum, and "burnt othur fumes."



            Many of the DMG poisons are quite nasty, and none of them include any caveats about losing their potency after a set period of time. Basic poison, the only poison readily available enough to show up in the Player's Handbook, looks very tame in comparison—but a dose of basic poison costs just 100 gp, and a dose of drow poison is 200 gp.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$









            • 2




              $begingroup$
              The drow poison is listed along with other sample poisons in the DM's Basic Rules here, just as it appears in the DMG: dndbeyond.com/compendium/rules/basic-rules/…
              $endgroup$
              – V2Blast
              yesterday






            • 2




              $begingroup$
              Not only is there no caveat, in the DMG under poisons under the Injury sub heading (the type of poison drow poison is categorized as) it specifically states that the poison is active until it enters a wound or is washed off.
              $endgroup$
              – lightcat
              yesterday





















            -3












            $begingroup$

            In your specific case of Drow poison:

            Yes, if everyone in your world follows the same laws of nature.

            No, if the NPCs use different rules and exceptions than the players.



            Chemicals react differently when exposed to air. It's up to the DM to decide how fast your chemicals dissipate. The DM is in control. :)



            It's true that NPCs do not have to follow the same rules as the players, but me personally, like the NPCs in my world to follow the same rules as the players. It's great for consistency.






            share|improve this answer










            New contributor




            Charles is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            $endgroup$









            • 3




              $begingroup$
              The asker may not be the DM; they don’t suggest so anywhere.
              $endgroup$
              – SevenSidedDie
              2 days ago










            • $begingroup$
              @SevenSidedDie "The asker may not be the DM"... Why not edit the answer to cover both cases? e.g It's up to the DM... The DM is in control of setting and NPC's
              $endgroup$
              – Nightwolf
              yesterday










            • $begingroup$
              @Nightwolf It would need more edits than that, since every paragraph is coloured by either assuming the asker is a DM or by relating the answerer's experience as a DM. It would be very hard to adjust the latter without putting words in the answerer's mouth, so best for the answerer to do it.
              $endgroup$
              – SevenSidedDie
              yesterday












            • $begingroup$
              @SevenSidedDie Of course I can make the necessary edits to help clear things up. All you had to do was ask. I thought my response could help, and I don't claim to be an writer.
              $endgroup$
              – Charles
              yesterday











            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "122"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f139663%2fdoes-a-drow-enemy-s-poison-expire-if-you-wait-1-minute%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            4 Answers
            4






            active

            oldest

            votes








            4 Answers
            4






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            32












            $begingroup$

            The Drow would still deal poison damage after a minute



            Creature statblocks only do what they say they do. In the statblock for a Drow, they are listed as having a crossbow attack that targets must save against or be poisoned. There's no mention of poison needing to be actively applied to maintain this effect, or of the Drow even having a supply of poisons on-hand.



            DMs can adjudicate the application of a Drow's poison, as a houserule/rule of fun



            Personally, as DM, if I knew a creature's poison attacks were probably caused by a manually applied poison, I'd probably narrate that the poison is applied on either the first round of combat, or in an ambush scenario (which is traditionally where Drow show up in combat) they'd have applied it right before combat began. Alternatively, if the PCs were to get the drop on the Drow, it might be that the Drow have to choose between fighting without poison, or wasting their first turn applying poison.



            One thing to note, however, is that the one minute limit on the poison duration only applies to Player Characters; it is not required to apply to NPCs of any kind. And as DM, you're not required to apply any kind of adjudication on this topic at all: if a statblock says the creature deals poison damage, then they deal poison damage, with no requirement to take into consideration other factors like time or circumstances.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$









            • 1




              $begingroup$
              A DM can always adjudicate differently, but the stat block just gives the damage (which includes poison) and does not state anywhere the need for the drow to apply it. Adjudicating application seems like a houserule (which is fine, but should be clear that it's not following the monster stat block)
              $endgroup$
              – NautArch
              2 days ago










            • $begingroup$
              @NautArch Yeah, I've been adding edits to make that a bit clearer. I realized that the original draft was probably a bit too loose in that regard.
              $endgroup$
              – Xirema
              2 days ago






            • 2




              $begingroup$
              Also, if a DM does create a houserule on this, it may change the CR of the drow. May being the operative word :)
              $endgroup$
              – NautArch
              2 days ago
















            32












            $begingroup$

            The Drow would still deal poison damage after a minute



            Creature statblocks only do what they say they do. In the statblock for a Drow, they are listed as having a crossbow attack that targets must save against or be poisoned. There's no mention of poison needing to be actively applied to maintain this effect, or of the Drow even having a supply of poisons on-hand.



            DMs can adjudicate the application of a Drow's poison, as a houserule/rule of fun



            Personally, as DM, if I knew a creature's poison attacks were probably caused by a manually applied poison, I'd probably narrate that the poison is applied on either the first round of combat, or in an ambush scenario (which is traditionally where Drow show up in combat) they'd have applied it right before combat began. Alternatively, if the PCs were to get the drop on the Drow, it might be that the Drow have to choose between fighting without poison, or wasting their first turn applying poison.



            One thing to note, however, is that the one minute limit on the poison duration only applies to Player Characters; it is not required to apply to NPCs of any kind. And as DM, you're not required to apply any kind of adjudication on this topic at all: if a statblock says the creature deals poison damage, then they deal poison damage, with no requirement to take into consideration other factors like time or circumstances.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$









            • 1




              $begingroup$
              A DM can always adjudicate differently, but the stat block just gives the damage (which includes poison) and does not state anywhere the need for the drow to apply it. Adjudicating application seems like a houserule (which is fine, but should be clear that it's not following the monster stat block)
              $endgroup$
              – NautArch
              2 days ago










            • $begingroup$
              @NautArch Yeah, I've been adding edits to make that a bit clearer. I realized that the original draft was probably a bit too loose in that regard.
              $endgroup$
              – Xirema
              2 days ago






            • 2




              $begingroup$
              Also, if a DM does create a houserule on this, it may change the CR of the drow. May being the operative word :)
              $endgroup$
              – NautArch
              2 days ago














            32












            32








            32





            $begingroup$

            The Drow would still deal poison damage after a minute



            Creature statblocks only do what they say they do. In the statblock for a Drow, they are listed as having a crossbow attack that targets must save against or be poisoned. There's no mention of poison needing to be actively applied to maintain this effect, or of the Drow even having a supply of poisons on-hand.



            DMs can adjudicate the application of a Drow's poison, as a houserule/rule of fun



            Personally, as DM, if I knew a creature's poison attacks were probably caused by a manually applied poison, I'd probably narrate that the poison is applied on either the first round of combat, or in an ambush scenario (which is traditionally where Drow show up in combat) they'd have applied it right before combat began. Alternatively, if the PCs were to get the drop on the Drow, it might be that the Drow have to choose between fighting without poison, or wasting their first turn applying poison.



            One thing to note, however, is that the one minute limit on the poison duration only applies to Player Characters; it is not required to apply to NPCs of any kind. And as DM, you're not required to apply any kind of adjudication on this topic at all: if a statblock says the creature deals poison damage, then they deal poison damage, with no requirement to take into consideration other factors like time or circumstances.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            The Drow would still deal poison damage after a minute



            Creature statblocks only do what they say they do. In the statblock for a Drow, they are listed as having a crossbow attack that targets must save against or be poisoned. There's no mention of poison needing to be actively applied to maintain this effect, or of the Drow even having a supply of poisons on-hand.



            DMs can adjudicate the application of a Drow's poison, as a houserule/rule of fun



            Personally, as DM, if I knew a creature's poison attacks were probably caused by a manually applied poison, I'd probably narrate that the poison is applied on either the first round of combat, or in an ambush scenario (which is traditionally where Drow show up in combat) they'd have applied it right before combat began. Alternatively, if the PCs were to get the drop on the Drow, it might be that the Drow have to choose between fighting without poison, or wasting their first turn applying poison.



            One thing to note, however, is that the one minute limit on the poison duration only applies to Player Characters; it is not required to apply to NPCs of any kind. And as DM, you're not required to apply any kind of adjudication on this topic at all: if a statblock says the creature deals poison damage, then they deal poison damage, with no requirement to take into consideration other factors like time or circumstances.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 2 days ago

























            answered 2 days ago









            XiremaXirema

            17.6k250108




            17.6k250108








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              A DM can always adjudicate differently, but the stat block just gives the damage (which includes poison) and does not state anywhere the need for the drow to apply it. Adjudicating application seems like a houserule (which is fine, but should be clear that it's not following the monster stat block)
              $endgroup$
              – NautArch
              2 days ago










            • $begingroup$
              @NautArch Yeah, I've been adding edits to make that a bit clearer. I realized that the original draft was probably a bit too loose in that regard.
              $endgroup$
              – Xirema
              2 days ago






            • 2




              $begingroup$
              Also, if a DM does create a houserule on this, it may change the CR of the drow. May being the operative word :)
              $endgroup$
              – NautArch
              2 days ago














            • 1




              $begingroup$
              A DM can always adjudicate differently, but the stat block just gives the damage (which includes poison) and does not state anywhere the need for the drow to apply it. Adjudicating application seems like a houserule (which is fine, but should be clear that it's not following the monster stat block)
              $endgroup$
              – NautArch
              2 days ago










            • $begingroup$
              @NautArch Yeah, I've been adding edits to make that a bit clearer. I realized that the original draft was probably a bit too loose in that regard.
              $endgroup$
              – Xirema
              2 days ago






            • 2




              $begingroup$
              Also, if a DM does create a houserule on this, it may change the CR of the drow. May being the operative word :)
              $endgroup$
              – NautArch
              2 days ago








            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            A DM can always adjudicate differently, but the stat block just gives the damage (which includes poison) and does not state anywhere the need for the drow to apply it. Adjudicating application seems like a houserule (which is fine, but should be clear that it's not following the monster stat block)
            $endgroup$
            – NautArch
            2 days ago




            $begingroup$
            A DM can always adjudicate differently, but the stat block just gives the damage (which includes poison) and does not state anywhere the need for the drow to apply it. Adjudicating application seems like a houserule (which is fine, but should be clear that it's not following the monster stat block)
            $endgroup$
            – NautArch
            2 days ago












            $begingroup$
            @NautArch Yeah, I've been adding edits to make that a bit clearer. I realized that the original draft was probably a bit too loose in that regard.
            $endgroup$
            – Xirema
            2 days ago




            $begingroup$
            @NautArch Yeah, I've been adding edits to make that a bit clearer. I realized that the original draft was probably a bit too loose in that regard.
            $endgroup$
            – Xirema
            2 days ago




            2




            2




            $begingroup$
            Also, if a DM does create a houserule on this, it may change the CR of the drow. May being the operative word :)
            $endgroup$
            – NautArch
            2 days ago




            $begingroup$
            Also, if a DM does create a houserule on this, it may change the CR of the drow. May being the operative word :)
            $endgroup$
            – NautArch
            2 days ago













            19












            $begingroup$

            No, because the drow is counted as an NPC, and therefore, follows different rules than a player character. The drow poison is not specified to be something that the drow must apply to their weaponry; it is an inherent part of the effects of the weaponry used by the drow.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              19












              $begingroup$

              No, because the drow is counted as an NPC, and therefore, follows different rules than a player character. The drow poison is not specified to be something that the drow must apply to their weaponry; it is an inherent part of the effects of the weaponry used by the drow.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                19












                19








                19





                $begingroup$

                No, because the drow is counted as an NPC, and therefore, follows different rules than a player character. The drow poison is not specified to be something that the drow must apply to their weaponry; it is an inherent part of the effects of the weaponry used by the drow.






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                No, because the drow is counted as an NPC, and therefore, follows different rules than a player character. The drow poison is not specified to be something that the drow must apply to their weaponry; it is an inherent part of the effects of the weaponry used by the drow.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 2 days ago









                L.S. CooperL.S. Cooper

                4,2701434




                4,2701434























                    7












                    $begingroup$

                    We're looking at two different kinds of poison.



                    The basic poison described in the PHB deals an extra 1d4 poison damage to an affected creature, and it dries out and becomes useless after a minute.



                    The drow poison used by the drow in the Monster Manual doesn't deal extra damage: It inflicts the poisoned condition and, sometimes, the unconscious condition.



                    We know that it's called "drow poison" because it's in the Dungeon Master's Guide (page 256)—where it's described as having the same effects listed in the drow stats. There are bunch of other poisons listed in the same section, including purple worm poison, truth serum, and "burnt othur fumes."



                    Many of the DMG poisons are quite nasty, and none of them include any caveats about losing their potency after a set period of time. Basic poison, the only poison readily available enough to show up in the Player's Handbook, looks very tame in comparison—but a dose of basic poison costs just 100 gp, and a dose of drow poison is 200 gp.






                    share|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$









                    • 2




                      $begingroup$
                      The drow poison is listed along with other sample poisons in the DM's Basic Rules here, just as it appears in the DMG: dndbeyond.com/compendium/rules/basic-rules/…
                      $endgroup$
                      – V2Blast
                      yesterday






                    • 2




                      $begingroup$
                      Not only is there no caveat, in the DMG under poisons under the Injury sub heading (the type of poison drow poison is categorized as) it specifically states that the poison is active until it enters a wound or is washed off.
                      $endgroup$
                      – lightcat
                      yesterday


















                    7












                    $begingroup$

                    We're looking at two different kinds of poison.



                    The basic poison described in the PHB deals an extra 1d4 poison damage to an affected creature, and it dries out and becomes useless after a minute.



                    The drow poison used by the drow in the Monster Manual doesn't deal extra damage: It inflicts the poisoned condition and, sometimes, the unconscious condition.



                    We know that it's called "drow poison" because it's in the Dungeon Master's Guide (page 256)—where it's described as having the same effects listed in the drow stats. There are bunch of other poisons listed in the same section, including purple worm poison, truth serum, and "burnt othur fumes."



                    Many of the DMG poisons are quite nasty, and none of them include any caveats about losing their potency after a set period of time. Basic poison, the only poison readily available enough to show up in the Player's Handbook, looks very tame in comparison—but a dose of basic poison costs just 100 gp, and a dose of drow poison is 200 gp.






                    share|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$









                    • 2




                      $begingroup$
                      The drow poison is listed along with other sample poisons in the DM's Basic Rules here, just as it appears in the DMG: dndbeyond.com/compendium/rules/basic-rules/…
                      $endgroup$
                      – V2Blast
                      yesterday






                    • 2




                      $begingroup$
                      Not only is there no caveat, in the DMG under poisons under the Injury sub heading (the type of poison drow poison is categorized as) it specifically states that the poison is active until it enters a wound or is washed off.
                      $endgroup$
                      – lightcat
                      yesterday
















                    7












                    7








                    7





                    $begingroup$

                    We're looking at two different kinds of poison.



                    The basic poison described in the PHB deals an extra 1d4 poison damage to an affected creature, and it dries out and becomes useless after a minute.



                    The drow poison used by the drow in the Monster Manual doesn't deal extra damage: It inflicts the poisoned condition and, sometimes, the unconscious condition.



                    We know that it's called "drow poison" because it's in the Dungeon Master's Guide (page 256)—where it's described as having the same effects listed in the drow stats. There are bunch of other poisons listed in the same section, including purple worm poison, truth serum, and "burnt othur fumes."



                    Many of the DMG poisons are quite nasty, and none of them include any caveats about losing their potency after a set period of time. Basic poison, the only poison readily available enough to show up in the Player's Handbook, looks very tame in comparison—but a dose of basic poison costs just 100 gp, and a dose of drow poison is 200 gp.






                    share|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    We're looking at two different kinds of poison.



                    The basic poison described in the PHB deals an extra 1d4 poison damage to an affected creature, and it dries out and becomes useless after a minute.



                    The drow poison used by the drow in the Monster Manual doesn't deal extra damage: It inflicts the poisoned condition and, sometimes, the unconscious condition.



                    We know that it's called "drow poison" because it's in the Dungeon Master's Guide (page 256)—where it's described as having the same effects listed in the drow stats. There are bunch of other poisons listed in the same section, including purple worm poison, truth serum, and "burnt othur fumes."



                    Many of the DMG poisons are quite nasty, and none of them include any caveats about losing their potency after a set period of time. Basic poison, the only poison readily available enough to show up in the Player's Handbook, looks very tame in comparison—but a dose of basic poison costs just 100 gp, and a dose of drow poison is 200 gp.







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered yesterday









                    Ryan VeederRyan Veeder

                    2,5081122




                    2,5081122








                    • 2




                      $begingroup$
                      The drow poison is listed along with other sample poisons in the DM's Basic Rules here, just as it appears in the DMG: dndbeyond.com/compendium/rules/basic-rules/…
                      $endgroup$
                      – V2Blast
                      yesterday






                    • 2




                      $begingroup$
                      Not only is there no caveat, in the DMG under poisons under the Injury sub heading (the type of poison drow poison is categorized as) it specifically states that the poison is active until it enters a wound or is washed off.
                      $endgroup$
                      – lightcat
                      yesterday
















                    • 2




                      $begingroup$
                      The drow poison is listed along with other sample poisons in the DM's Basic Rules here, just as it appears in the DMG: dndbeyond.com/compendium/rules/basic-rules/…
                      $endgroup$
                      – V2Blast
                      yesterday






                    • 2




                      $begingroup$
                      Not only is there no caveat, in the DMG under poisons under the Injury sub heading (the type of poison drow poison is categorized as) it specifically states that the poison is active until it enters a wound or is washed off.
                      $endgroup$
                      – lightcat
                      yesterday










                    2




                    2




                    $begingroup$
                    The drow poison is listed along with other sample poisons in the DM's Basic Rules here, just as it appears in the DMG: dndbeyond.com/compendium/rules/basic-rules/…
                    $endgroup$
                    – V2Blast
                    yesterday




                    $begingroup$
                    The drow poison is listed along with other sample poisons in the DM's Basic Rules here, just as it appears in the DMG: dndbeyond.com/compendium/rules/basic-rules/…
                    $endgroup$
                    – V2Blast
                    yesterday




                    2




                    2




                    $begingroup$
                    Not only is there no caveat, in the DMG under poisons under the Injury sub heading (the type of poison drow poison is categorized as) it specifically states that the poison is active until it enters a wound or is washed off.
                    $endgroup$
                    – lightcat
                    yesterday






                    $begingroup$
                    Not only is there no caveat, in the DMG under poisons under the Injury sub heading (the type of poison drow poison is categorized as) it specifically states that the poison is active until it enters a wound or is washed off.
                    $endgroup$
                    – lightcat
                    yesterday













                    -3












                    $begingroup$

                    In your specific case of Drow poison:

                    Yes, if everyone in your world follows the same laws of nature.

                    No, if the NPCs use different rules and exceptions than the players.



                    Chemicals react differently when exposed to air. It's up to the DM to decide how fast your chemicals dissipate. The DM is in control. :)



                    It's true that NPCs do not have to follow the same rules as the players, but me personally, like the NPCs in my world to follow the same rules as the players. It's great for consistency.






                    share|improve this answer










                    New contributor




                    Charles is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.






                    $endgroup$









                    • 3




                      $begingroup$
                      The asker may not be the DM; they don’t suggest so anywhere.
                      $endgroup$
                      – SevenSidedDie
                      2 days ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      @SevenSidedDie "The asker may not be the DM"... Why not edit the answer to cover both cases? e.g It's up to the DM... The DM is in control of setting and NPC's
                      $endgroup$
                      – Nightwolf
                      yesterday










                    • $begingroup$
                      @Nightwolf It would need more edits than that, since every paragraph is coloured by either assuming the asker is a DM or by relating the answerer's experience as a DM. It would be very hard to adjust the latter without putting words in the answerer's mouth, so best for the answerer to do it.
                      $endgroup$
                      – SevenSidedDie
                      yesterday












                    • $begingroup$
                      @SevenSidedDie Of course I can make the necessary edits to help clear things up. All you had to do was ask. I thought my response could help, and I don't claim to be an writer.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Charles
                      yesterday
















                    -3












                    $begingroup$

                    In your specific case of Drow poison:

                    Yes, if everyone in your world follows the same laws of nature.

                    No, if the NPCs use different rules and exceptions than the players.



                    Chemicals react differently when exposed to air. It's up to the DM to decide how fast your chemicals dissipate. The DM is in control. :)



                    It's true that NPCs do not have to follow the same rules as the players, but me personally, like the NPCs in my world to follow the same rules as the players. It's great for consistency.






                    share|improve this answer










                    New contributor




                    Charles is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.






                    $endgroup$









                    • 3




                      $begingroup$
                      The asker may not be the DM; they don’t suggest so anywhere.
                      $endgroup$
                      – SevenSidedDie
                      2 days ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      @SevenSidedDie "The asker may not be the DM"... Why not edit the answer to cover both cases? e.g It's up to the DM... The DM is in control of setting and NPC's
                      $endgroup$
                      – Nightwolf
                      yesterday










                    • $begingroup$
                      @Nightwolf It would need more edits than that, since every paragraph is coloured by either assuming the asker is a DM or by relating the answerer's experience as a DM. It would be very hard to adjust the latter without putting words in the answerer's mouth, so best for the answerer to do it.
                      $endgroup$
                      – SevenSidedDie
                      yesterday












                    • $begingroup$
                      @SevenSidedDie Of course I can make the necessary edits to help clear things up. All you had to do was ask. I thought my response could help, and I don't claim to be an writer.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Charles
                      yesterday














                    -3












                    -3








                    -3





                    $begingroup$

                    In your specific case of Drow poison:

                    Yes, if everyone in your world follows the same laws of nature.

                    No, if the NPCs use different rules and exceptions than the players.



                    Chemicals react differently when exposed to air. It's up to the DM to decide how fast your chemicals dissipate. The DM is in control. :)



                    It's true that NPCs do not have to follow the same rules as the players, but me personally, like the NPCs in my world to follow the same rules as the players. It's great for consistency.






                    share|improve this answer










                    New contributor




                    Charles is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.






                    $endgroup$



                    In your specific case of Drow poison:

                    Yes, if everyone in your world follows the same laws of nature.

                    No, if the NPCs use different rules and exceptions than the players.



                    Chemicals react differently when exposed to air. It's up to the DM to decide how fast your chemicals dissipate. The DM is in control. :)



                    It's true that NPCs do not have to follow the same rules as the players, but me personally, like the NPCs in my world to follow the same rules as the players. It's great for consistency.







                    share|improve this answer










                    New contributor




                    Charles is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.









                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited yesterday





















                    New contributor




                    Charles is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.









                    answered 2 days ago









                    CharlesCharles

                    215




                    215




                    New contributor




                    Charles is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.





                    New contributor





                    Charles is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.






                    Charles is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.








                    • 3




                      $begingroup$
                      The asker may not be the DM; they don’t suggest so anywhere.
                      $endgroup$
                      – SevenSidedDie
                      2 days ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      @SevenSidedDie "The asker may not be the DM"... Why not edit the answer to cover both cases? e.g It's up to the DM... The DM is in control of setting and NPC's
                      $endgroup$
                      – Nightwolf
                      yesterday










                    • $begingroup$
                      @Nightwolf It would need more edits than that, since every paragraph is coloured by either assuming the asker is a DM or by relating the answerer's experience as a DM. It would be very hard to adjust the latter without putting words in the answerer's mouth, so best for the answerer to do it.
                      $endgroup$
                      – SevenSidedDie
                      yesterday












                    • $begingroup$
                      @SevenSidedDie Of course I can make the necessary edits to help clear things up. All you had to do was ask. I thought my response could help, and I don't claim to be an writer.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Charles
                      yesterday














                    • 3




                      $begingroup$
                      The asker may not be the DM; they don’t suggest so anywhere.
                      $endgroup$
                      – SevenSidedDie
                      2 days ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      @SevenSidedDie "The asker may not be the DM"... Why not edit the answer to cover both cases? e.g It's up to the DM... The DM is in control of setting and NPC's
                      $endgroup$
                      – Nightwolf
                      yesterday










                    • $begingroup$
                      @Nightwolf It would need more edits than that, since every paragraph is coloured by either assuming the asker is a DM or by relating the answerer's experience as a DM. It would be very hard to adjust the latter without putting words in the answerer's mouth, so best for the answerer to do it.
                      $endgroup$
                      – SevenSidedDie
                      yesterday












                    • $begingroup$
                      @SevenSidedDie Of course I can make the necessary edits to help clear things up. All you had to do was ask. I thought my response could help, and I don't claim to be an writer.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Charles
                      yesterday








                    3




                    3




                    $begingroup$
                    The asker may not be the DM; they don’t suggest so anywhere.
                    $endgroup$
                    – SevenSidedDie
                    2 days ago




                    $begingroup$
                    The asker may not be the DM; they don’t suggest so anywhere.
                    $endgroup$
                    – SevenSidedDie
                    2 days ago












                    $begingroup$
                    @SevenSidedDie "The asker may not be the DM"... Why not edit the answer to cover both cases? e.g It's up to the DM... The DM is in control of setting and NPC's
                    $endgroup$
                    – Nightwolf
                    yesterday




                    $begingroup$
                    @SevenSidedDie "The asker may not be the DM"... Why not edit the answer to cover both cases? e.g It's up to the DM... The DM is in control of setting and NPC's
                    $endgroup$
                    – Nightwolf
                    yesterday












                    $begingroup$
                    @Nightwolf It would need more edits than that, since every paragraph is coloured by either assuming the asker is a DM or by relating the answerer's experience as a DM. It would be very hard to adjust the latter without putting words in the answerer's mouth, so best for the answerer to do it.
                    $endgroup$
                    – SevenSidedDie
                    yesterday






                    $begingroup$
                    @Nightwolf It would need more edits than that, since every paragraph is coloured by either assuming the asker is a DM or by relating the answerer's experience as a DM. It would be very hard to adjust the latter without putting words in the answerer's mouth, so best for the answerer to do it.
                    $endgroup$
                    – SevenSidedDie
                    yesterday














                    $begingroup$
                    @SevenSidedDie Of course I can make the necessary edits to help clear things up. All you had to do was ask. I thought my response could help, and I don't claim to be an writer.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Charles
                    yesterday




                    $begingroup$
                    @SevenSidedDie Of course I can make the necessary edits to help clear things up. All you had to do was ask. I thought my response could help, and I don't claim to be an writer.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Charles
                    yesterday


















                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f139663%2fdoes-a-drow-enemy-s-poison-expire-if-you-wait-1-minute%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Paul Cézanne

                    UIScrollView CustomStickyHeader Resize height generates problems when scroll is too fast

                    Angular material date-picker (MatDatepicker) auto completes the date on focus out