How do articles with “mind” modify meaning of sentences on this Wikipedia page?












-1















Why are there different usages of the articles with 'mind' throughout the entire article. It seems to me that this is done in arbitrary way?




The mind is a set of cognitive faculties...



...what constitutes a mind and what are its distinguishing properties.



...or whether mind can also be a property of some types of human-made
machines



Some see mind as a property exclusive to humans whereas others
ascribe...




Please, explain meaning of the use of a, the and zero article with 'mind' in here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mind










share|improve this question









New contributor




Oleksiy Plotnyts'kyy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1





    References to 'mind' with an article seem to be considering it as part of what makes up a human being, like a part of the body - 'The hand' = hands in general, 'a hand' = a particular one. 'Mind' without an article seems to refer to it as an abstract concept; a 'property' as your quotes say. Hope this makes sense.

    – Kate Bunting
    2 days ago











  • What @KateBunting said. But I would add that the zero article usage is at least a little "strange". It treats mind as an (abstract) attribute, akin to how we would use words like consciousness, but it seems to me it's more like soul (or compound nouns like sex drive). Such nouns don't really work very well as (zero-article) "attributes / properties". I'd much prefer to say the property of having a mind / soul might be exclusive to humans (except I don't believe either of those two possible assertions anyway).

    – FumbleFingers
    2 days ago











  • But why do we want to say about things in general ('the mind') sometimes and in particular ('a mind') other times. This is not clear to me. Would it be incorrect to say "...what constitutes the mind and what are its distinguishing properties"?

    – Oleksiy Plotnyts'kyy
    2 days ago













  • Please read Dr Lawler's piece on generic noun phrases.

    – 9fyj'j55-8ujfr5yhjky-'tt6yhkjj
    2 days ago
















-1















Why are there different usages of the articles with 'mind' throughout the entire article. It seems to me that this is done in arbitrary way?




The mind is a set of cognitive faculties...



...what constitutes a mind and what are its distinguishing properties.



...or whether mind can also be a property of some types of human-made
machines



Some see mind as a property exclusive to humans whereas others
ascribe...




Please, explain meaning of the use of a, the and zero article with 'mind' in here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mind










share|improve this question









New contributor




Oleksiy Plotnyts'kyy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1





    References to 'mind' with an article seem to be considering it as part of what makes up a human being, like a part of the body - 'The hand' = hands in general, 'a hand' = a particular one. 'Mind' without an article seems to refer to it as an abstract concept; a 'property' as your quotes say. Hope this makes sense.

    – Kate Bunting
    2 days ago











  • What @KateBunting said. But I would add that the zero article usage is at least a little "strange". It treats mind as an (abstract) attribute, akin to how we would use words like consciousness, but it seems to me it's more like soul (or compound nouns like sex drive). Such nouns don't really work very well as (zero-article) "attributes / properties". I'd much prefer to say the property of having a mind / soul might be exclusive to humans (except I don't believe either of those two possible assertions anyway).

    – FumbleFingers
    2 days ago











  • But why do we want to say about things in general ('the mind') sometimes and in particular ('a mind') other times. This is not clear to me. Would it be incorrect to say "...what constitutes the mind and what are its distinguishing properties"?

    – Oleksiy Plotnyts'kyy
    2 days ago













  • Please read Dr Lawler's piece on generic noun phrases.

    – 9fyj'j55-8ujfr5yhjky-'tt6yhkjj
    2 days ago














-1












-1








-1








Why are there different usages of the articles with 'mind' throughout the entire article. It seems to me that this is done in arbitrary way?




The mind is a set of cognitive faculties...



...what constitutes a mind and what are its distinguishing properties.



...or whether mind can also be a property of some types of human-made
machines



Some see mind as a property exclusive to humans whereas others
ascribe...




Please, explain meaning of the use of a, the and zero article with 'mind' in here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mind










share|improve this question









New contributor




Oleksiy Plotnyts'kyy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












Why are there different usages of the articles with 'mind' throughout the entire article. It seems to me that this is done in arbitrary way?




The mind is a set of cognitive faculties...



...what constitutes a mind and what are its distinguishing properties.



...or whether mind can also be a property of some types of human-made
machines



Some see mind as a property exclusive to humans whereas others
ascribe...




Please, explain meaning of the use of a, the and zero article with 'mind' in here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mind







articles






share|improve this question









New contributor




Oleksiy Plotnyts'kyy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Oleksiy Plotnyts'kyy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 days ago







Oleksiy Plotnyts'kyy













New contributor




Oleksiy Plotnyts'kyy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 days ago









Oleksiy Plotnyts'kyyOleksiy Plotnyts'kyy

63




63




New contributor




Oleksiy Plotnyts'kyy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Oleksiy Plotnyts'kyy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Oleksiy Plotnyts'kyy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 1





    References to 'mind' with an article seem to be considering it as part of what makes up a human being, like a part of the body - 'The hand' = hands in general, 'a hand' = a particular one. 'Mind' without an article seems to refer to it as an abstract concept; a 'property' as your quotes say. Hope this makes sense.

    – Kate Bunting
    2 days ago











  • What @KateBunting said. But I would add that the zero article usage is at least a little "strange". It treats mind as an (abstract) attribute, akin to how we would use words like consciousness, but it seems to me it's more like soul (or compound nouns like sex drive). Such nouns don't really work very well as (zero-article) "attributes / properties". I'd much prefer to say the property of having a mind / soul might be exclusive to humans (except I don't believe either of those two possible assertions anyway).

    – FumbleFingers
    2 days ago











  • But why do we want to say about things in general ('the mind') sometimes and in particular ('a mind') other times. This is not clear to me. Would it be incorrect to say "...what constitutes the mind and what are its distinguishing properties"?

    – Oleksiy Plotnyts'kyy
    2 days ago













  • Please read Dr Lawler's piece on generic noun phrases.

    – 9fyj'j55-8ujfr5yhjky-'tt6yhkjj
    2 days ago














  • 1





    References to 'mind' with an article seem to be considering it as part of what makes up a human being, like a part of the body - 'The hand' = hands in general, 'a hand' = a particular one. 'Mind' without an article seems to refer to it as an abstract concept; a 'property' as your quotes say. Hope this makes sense.

    – Kate Bunting
    2 days ago











  • What @KateBunting said. But I would add that the zero article usage is at least a little "strange". It treats mind as an (abstract) attribute, akin to how we would use words like consciousness, but it seems to me it's more like soul (or compound nouns like sex drive). Such nouns don't really work very well as (zero-article) "attributes / properties". I'd much prefer to say the property of having a mind / soul might be exclusive to humans (except I don't believe either of those two possible assertions anyway).

    – FumbleFingers
    2 days ago











  • But why do we want to say about things in general ('the mind') sometimes and in particular ('a mind') other times. This is not clear to me. Would it be incorrect to say "...what constitutes the mind and what are its distinguishing properties"?

    – Oleksiy Plotnyts'kyy
    2 days ago













  • Please read Dr Lawler's piece on generic noun phrases.

    – 9fyj'j55-8ujfr5yhjky-'tt6yhkjj
    2 days ago








1




1





References to 'mind' with an article seem to be considering it as part of what makes up a human being, like a part of the body - 'The hand' = hands in general, 'a hand' = a particular one. 'Mind' without an article seems to refer to it as an abstract concept; a 'property' as your quotes say. Hope this makes sense.

– Kate Bunting
2 days ago





References to 'mind' with an article seem to be considering it as part of what makes up a human being, like a part of the body - 'The hand' = hands in general, 'a hand' = a particular one. 'Mind' without an article seems to refer to it as an abstract concept; a 'property' as your quotes say. Hope this makes sense.

– Kate Bunting
2 days ago













What @KateBunting said. But I would add that the zero article usage is at least a little "strange". It treats mind as an (abstract) attribute, akin to how we would use words like consciousness, but it seems to me it's more like soul (or compound nouns like sex drive). Such nouns don't really work very well as (zero-article) "attributes / properties". I'd much prefer to say the property of having a mind / soul might be exclusive to humans (except I don't believe either of those two possible assertions anyway).

– FumbleFingers
2 days ago





What @KateBunting said. But I would add that the zero article usage is at least a little "strange". It treats mind as an (abstract) attribute, akin to how we would use words like consciousness, but it seems to me it's more like soul (or compound nouns like sex drive). Such nouns don't really work very well as (zero-article) "attributes / properties". I'd much prefer to say the property of having a mind / soul might be exclusive to humans (except I don't believe either of those two possible assertions anyway).

– FumbleFingers
2 days ago













But why do we want to say about things in general ('the mind') sometimes and in particular ('a mind') other times. This is not clear to me. Would it be incorrect to say "...what constitutes the mind and what are its distinguishing properties"?

– Oleksiy Plotnyts'kyy
2 days ago







But why do we want to say about things in general ('the mind') sometimes and in particular ('a mind') other times. This is not clear to me. Would it be incorrect to say "...what constitutes the mind and what are its distinguishing properties"?

– Oleksiy Plotnyts'kyy
2 days ago















Please read Dr Lawler's piece on generic noun phrases.

– 9fyj'j55-8ujfr5yhjky-'tt6yhkjj
2 days ago





Please read Dr Lawler's piece on generic noun phrases.

– 9fyj'j55-8ujfr5yhjky-'tt6yhkjj
2 days ago










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});






Oleksiy Plotnyts'kyy is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f480802%2fhow-do-articles-with-mind-modify-meaning-of-sentences-on-this-wikipedia-page%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








Oleksiy Plotnyts'kyy is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















Oleksiy Plotnyts'kyy is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













Oleksiy Plotnyts'kyy is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Oleksiy Plotnyts'kyy is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f480802%2fhow-do-articles-with-mind-modify-meaning-of-sentences-on-this-wikipedia-page%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

"Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

Alcedinidae

Origin of the phrase “under your belt”?