How do articles with “mind” modify meaning of sentences on this Wikipedia page?
Why are there different usages of the articles with 'mind' throughout the entire article. It seems to me that this is done in arbitrary way?
The mind is a set of cognitive faculties...
...what constitutes a mind and what are its distinguishing properties.
...or whether mind can also be a property of some types of human-made
machines
Some see mind as a property exclusive to humans whereas others
ascribe...
Please, explain meaning of the use of a, the and zero article with 'mind' in here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mind
articles
New contributor
add a comment |
Why are there different usages of the articles with 'mind' throughout the entire article. It seems to me that this is done in arbitrary way?
The mind is a set of cognitive faculties...
...what constitutes a mind and what are its distinguishing properties.
...or whether mind can also be a property of some types of human-made
machines
Some see mind as a property exclusive to humans whereas others
ascribe...
Please, explain meaning of the use of a, the and zero article with 'mind' in here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mind
articles
New contributor
1
References to 'mind' with an article seem to be considering it as part of what makes up a human being, like a part of the body - 'The hand' = hands in general, 'a hand' = a particular one. 'Mind' without an article seems to refer to it as an abstract concept; a 'property' as your quotes say. Hope this makes sense.
– Kate Bunting
2 days ago
What @KateBunting said. But I would add that the zero article usage is at least a little "strange". It treats mind as an (abstract) attribute, akin to how we would use words like consciousness, but it seems to me it's more like soul (or compound nouns like sex drive). Such nouns don't really work very well as (zero-article) "attributes / properties". I'd much prefer to say the property of having a mind / soul might be exclusive to humans (except I don't believe either of those two possible assertions anyway).
– FumbleFingers
2 days ago
But why do we want to say about things in general ('the mind') sometimes and in particular ('a mind') other times. This is not clear to me. Would it be incorrect to say "...what constitutes the mind and what are its distinguishing properties"?
– Oleksiy Plotnyts'kyy
2 days ago
Please read Dr Lawler's piece on generic noun phrases.
– 9fyj'j55-8ujfr5yhjky-'tt6yhkjj
2 days ago
add a comment |
Why are there different usages of the articles with 'mind' throughout the entire article. It seems to me that this is done in arbitrary way?
The mind is a set of cognitive faculties...
...what constitutes a mind and what are its distinguishing properties.
...or whether mind can also be a property of some types of human-made
machines
Some see mind as a property exclusive to humans whereas others
ascribe...
Please, explain meaning of the use of a, the and zero article with 'mind' in here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mind
articles
New contributor
Why are there different usages of the articles with 'mind' throughout the entire article. It seems to me that this is done in arbitrary way?
The mind is a set of cognitive faculties...
...what constitutes a mind and what are its distinguishing properties.
...or whether mind can also be a property of some types of human-made
machines
Some see mind as a property exclusive to humans whereas others
ascribe...
Please, explain meaning of the use of a, the and zero article with 'mind' in here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mind
articles
articles
New contributor
New contributor
edited 2 days ago
Oleksiy Plotnyts'kyy
New contributor
asked 2 days ago
Oleksiy Plotnyts'kyyOleksiy Plotnyts'kyy
63
63
New contributor
New contributor
1
References to 'mind' with an article seem to be considering it as part of what makes up a human being, like a part of the body - 'The hand' = hands in general, 'a hand' = a particular one. 'Mind' without an article seems to refer to it as an abstract concept; a 'property' as your quotes say. Hope this makes sense.
– Kate Bunting
2 days ago
What @KateBunting said. But I would add that the zero article usage is at least a little "strange". It treats mind as an (abstract) attribute, akin to how we would use words like consciousness, but it seems to me it's more like soul (or compound nouns like sex drive). Such nouns don't really work very well as (zero-article) "attributes / properties". I'd much prefer to say the property of having a mind / soul might be exclusive to humans (except I don't believe either of those two possible assertions anyway).
– FumbleFingers
2 days ago
But why do we want to say about things in general ('the mind') sometimes and in particular ('a mind') other times. This is not clear to me. Would it be incorrect to say "...what constitutes the mind and what are its distinguishing properties"?
– Oleksiy Plotnyts'kyy
2 days ago
Please read Dr Lawler's piece on generic noun phrases.
– 9fyj'j55-8ujfr5yhjky-'tt6yhkjj
2 days ago
add a comment |
1
References to 'mind' with an article seem to be considering it as part of what makes up a human being, like a part of the body - 'The hand' = hands in general, 'a hand' = a particular one. 'Mind' without an article seems to refer to it as an abstract concept; a 'property' as your quotes say. Hope this makes sense.
– Kate Bunting
2 days ago
What @KateBunting said. But I would add that the zero article usage is at least a little "strange". It treats mind as an (abstract) attribute, akin to how we would use words like consciousness, but it seems to me it's more like soul (or compound nouns like sex drive). Such nouns don't really work very well as (zero-article) "attributes / properties". I'd much prefer to say the property of having a mind / soul might be exclusive to humans (except I don't believe either of those two possible assertions anyway).
– FumbleFingers
2 days ago
But why do we want to say about things in general ('the mind') sometimes and in particular ('a mind') other times. This is not clear to me. Would it be incorrect to say "...what constitutes the mind and what are its distinguishing properties"?
– Oleksiy Plotnyts'kyy
2 days ago
Please read Dr Lawler's piece on generic noun phrases.
– 9fyj'j55-8ujfr5yhjky-'tt6yhkjj
2 days ago
1
1
References to 'mind' with an article seem to be considering it as part of what makes up a human being, like a part of the body - 'The hand' = hands in general, 'a hand' = a particular one. 'Mind' without an article seems to refer to it as an abstract concept; a 'property' as your quotes say. Hope this makes sense.
– Kate Bunting
2 days ago
References to 'mind' with an article seem to be considering it as part of what makes up a human being, like a part of the body - 'The hand' = hands in general, 'a hand' = a particular one. 'Mind' without an article seems to refer to it as an abstract concept; a 'property' as your quotes say. Hope this makes sense.
– Kate Bunting
2 days ago
What @KateBunting said. But I would add that the zero article usage is at least a little "strange". It treats mind as an (abstract) attribute, akin to how we would use words like consciousness, but it seems to me it's more like soul (or compound nouns like sex drive). Such nouns don't really work very well as (zero-article) "attributes / properties". I'd much prefer to say the property of having a mind / soul might be exclusive to humans (except I don't believe either of those two possible assertions anyway).
– FumbleFingers
2 days ago
What @KateBunting said. But I would add that the zero article usage is at least a little "strange". It treats mind as an (abstract) attribute, akin to how we would use words like consciousness, but it seems to me it's more like soul (or compound nouns like sex drive). Such nouns don't really work very well as (zero-article) "attributes / properties". I'd much prefer to say the property of having a mind / soul might be exclusive to humans (except I don't believe either of those two possible assertions anyway).
– FumbleFingers
2 days ago
But why do we want to say about things in general ('the mind') sometimes and in particular ('a mind') other times. This is not clear to me. Would it be incorrect to say "...what constitutes the mind and what are its distinguishing properties"?
– Oleksiy Plotnyts'kyy
2 days ago
But why do we want to say about things in general ('the mind') sometimes and in particular ('a mind') other times. This is not clear to me. Would it be incorrect to say "...what constitutes the mind and what are its distinguishing properties"?
– Oleksiy Plotnyts'kyy
2 days ago
Please read Dr Lawler's piece on generic noun phrases.
– 9fyj'j55-8ujfr5yhjky-'tt6yhkjj
2 days ago
Please read Dr Lawler's piece on generic noun phrases.
– 9fyj'j55-8ujfr5yhjky-'tt6yhkjj
2 days ago
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Oleksiy Plotnyts'kyy is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f480802%2fhow-do-articles-with-mind-modify-meaning-of-sentences-on-this-wikipedia-page%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Oleksiy Plotnyts'kyy is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Oleksiy Plotnyts'kyy is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Oleksiy Plotnyts'kyy is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Oleksiy Plotnyts'kyy is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f480802%2fhow-do-articles-with-mind-modify-meaning-of-sentences-on-this-wikipedia-page%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
References to 'mind' with an article seem to be considering it as part of what makes up a human being, like a part of the body - 'The hand' = hands in general, 'a hand' = a particular one. 'Mind' without an article seems to refer to it as an abstract concept; a 'property' as your quotes say. Hope this makes sense.
– Kate Bunting
2 days ago
What @KateBunting said. But I would add that the zero article usage is at least a little "strange". It treats mind as an (abstract) attribute, akin to how we would use words like consciousness, but it seems to me it's more like soul (or compound nouns like sex drive). Such nouns don't really work very well as (zero-article) "attributes / properties". I'd much prefer to say the property of having a mind / soul might be exclusive to humans (except I don't believe either of those two possible assertions anyway).
– FumbleFingers
2 days ago
But why do we want to say about things in general ('the mind') sometimes and in particular ('a mind') other times. This is not clear to me. Would it be incorrect to say "...what constitutes the mind and what are its distinguishing properties"?
– Oleksiy Plotnyts'kyy
2 days ago
Please read Dr Lawler's piece on generic noun phrases.
– 9fyj'j55-8ujfr5yhjky-'tt6yhkjj
2 days ago