'for' instead of because [duplicate]












0
















This question already has an answer here:




  • When are “because”, “since”,“for” and “as” interchangeable?

    5 answers




Do you think all of the conjunctions below are acceptable? I just feel that 'for' may not work. Thx!



Bullying is unacceptable because it is against the school rules.
as
since
for??






prepositions







share|improve this question







New contributor




Ed Chu is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











marked as duplicate by RegDwigнt♦ 2 days ago


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
















  • For is no longer in common use today in the sense of "because," other than in literary use. It's now only a preposition in general English writing.

    – Kris
    2 days ago











  • It's still grammatical, though.

    – Kris
    2 days ago













  • @Kris When did you decide it was no longer in common use, and whose permission did you get to abolish it for everyday purposes?

    – WS2
    2 days ago













  • Thx for the input! I understand it now that ‘for’ is largely used as a preposition rather than a conjunction in modern day English. Thx!

    – Ed Chu
    2 days ago
















0
















This question already has an answer here:




  • When are “because”, “since”,“for” and “as” interchangeable?

    5 answers




Do you think all of the conjunctions below are acceptable? I just feel that 'for' may not work. Thx!



Bullying is unacceptable because it is against the school rules.
as
since
for??






prepositions







share|improve this question







New contributor




Ed Chu is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











marked as duplicate by RegDwigнt♦ 2 days ago


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
















  • For is no longer in common use today in the sense of "because," other than in literary use. It's now only a preposition in general English writing.

    – Kris
    2 days ago











  • It's still grammatical, though.

    – Kris
    2 days ago













  • @Kris When did you decide it was no longer in common use, and whose permission did you get to abolish it for everyday purposes?

    – WS2
    2 days ago













  • Thx for the input! I understand it now that ‘for’ is largely used as a preposition rather than a conjunction in modern day English. Thx!

    – Ed Chu
    2 days ago














0












0








0


1







This question already has an answer here:




  • When are “because”, “since”,“for” and “as” interchangeable?

    5 answers




Do you think all of the conjunctions below are acceptable? I just feel that 'for' may not work. Thx!



Bullying is unacceptable because it is against the school rules.
as
since
for??






prepositions







share|improve this question







New contributor




Ed Chu is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.













This question already has an answer here:




  • When are “because”, “since”,“for” and “as” interchangeable?

    5 answers




Do you think all of the conjunctions below are acceptable? I just feel that 'for' may not work. Thx!



Bullying is unacceptable because it is against the school rules.
as
since
for??





This question already has an answer here:




  • When are “because”, “since”,“for” and “as” interchangeable?

    5 answers







prepositions




prepositions






share|improve this question







New contributor




Ed Chu is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




Ed Chu is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




Ed Chu is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 days ago









Ed ChuEd Chu

1




1




New contributor




Ed Chu is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Ed Chu is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Ed Chu is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




marked as duplicate by RegDwigнt♦ 2 days ago


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.






marked as duplicate by RegDwigнt♦ 2 days ago


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.















  • For is no longer in common use today in the sense of "because," other than in literary use. It's now only a preposition in general English writing.

    – Kris
    2 days ago











  • It's still grammatical, though.

    – Kris
    2 days ago













  • @Kris When did you decide it was no longer in common use, and whose permission did you get to abolish it for everyday purposes?

    – WS2
    2 days ago













  • Thx for the input! I understand it now that ‘for’ is largely used as a preposition rather than a conjunction in modern day English. Thx!

    – Ed Chu
    2 days ago



















  • For is no longer in common use today in the sense of "because," other than in literary use. It's now only a preposition in general English writing.

    – Kris
    2 days ago











  • It's still grammatical, though.

    – Kris
    2 days ago













  • @Kris When did you decide it was no longer in common use, and whose permission did you get to abolish it for everyday purposes?

    – WS2
    2 days ago













  • Thx for the input! I understand it now that ‘for’ is largely used as a preposition rather than a conjunction in modern day English. Thx!

    – Ed Chu
    2 days ago

















For is no longer in common use today in the sense of "because," other than in literary use. It's now only a preposition in general English writing.

– Kris
2 days ago





For is no longer in common use today in the sense of "because," other than in literary use. It's now only a preposition in general English writing.

– Kris
2 days ago













It's still grammatical, though.

– Kris
2 days ago







It's still grammatical, though.

– Kris
2 days ago















@Kris When did you decide it was no longer in common use, and whose permission did you get to abolish it for everyday purposes?

– WS2
2 days ago







@Kris When did you decide it was no longer in common use, and whose permission did you get to abolish it for everyday purposes?

– WS2
2 days ago















Thx for the input! I understand it now that ‘for’ is largely used as a preposition rather than a conjunction in modern day English. Thx!

– Ed Chu
2 days ago





Thx for the input! I understand it now that ‘for’ is largely used as a preposition rather than a conjunction in modern day English. Thx!

– Ed Chu
2 days ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














'Because', 'as' and 'since' are conjunctions.



'For' is a preposition.



So we can make only the following sentences:



Bullying is unacceptable BECAUSE it is against the school rules.



Bullying is unacceptable AS it is against the school rules.



Bullying is unacceptable SINCE it is against the school rules.






share|improve this answer


























  • And how about "Why is it unacceptable? For it's against school rules."

    – WS2
    2 days ago


















1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0














'Because', 'as' and 'since' are conjunctions.



'For' is a preposition.



So we can make only the following sentences:



Bullying is unacceptable BECAUSE it is against the school rules.



Bullying is unacceptable AS it is against the school rules.



Bullying is unacceptable SINCE it is against the school rules.






share|improve this answer


























  • And how about "Why is it unacceptable? For it's against school rules."

    – WS2
    2 days ago
















0














'Because', 'as' and 'since' are conjunctions.



'For' is a preposition.



So we can make only the following sentences:



Bullying is unacceptable BECAUSE it is against the school rules.



Bullying is unacceptable AS it is against the school rules.



Bullying is unacceptable SINCE it is against the school rules.






share|improve this answer


























  • And how about "Why is it unacceptable? For it's against school rules."

    – WS2
    2 days ago














0












0








0







'Because', 'as' and 'since' are conjunctions.



'For' is a preposition.



So we can make only the following sentences:



Bullying is unacceptable BECAUSE it is against the school rules.



Bullying is unacceptable AS it is against the school rules.



Bullying is unacceptable SINCE it is against the school rules.






share|improve this answer















'Because', 'as' and 'since' are conjunctions.



'For' is a preposition.



So we can make only the following sentences:



Bullying is unacceptable BECAUSE it is against the school rules.



Bullying is unacceptable AS it is against the school rules.



Bullying is unacceptable SINCE it is against the school rules.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 2 days ago

























answered 2 days ago









user307254user307254

2,564514




2,564514













  • And how about "Why is it unacceptable? For it's against school rules."

    – WS2
    2 days ago



















  • And how about "Why is it unacceptable? For it's against school rules."

    – WS2
    2 days ago

















And how about "Why is it unacceptable? For it's against school rules."

– WS2
2 days ago





And how about "Why is it unacceptable? For it's against school rules."

– WS2
2 days ago



-

Popular posts from this blog

If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

Image
5 This question already has an answer here: How do you calculate the likelihood of drawing certain cards in your opening hand? 3 answers There is a funny modern deck where you play Treasure Hunt, but you really need to have it on the starting hand. How many mulligans should I take, if my deck contains 60 cards and contains 4 copies of Treasure Hunt? magic-the-gathering probability share | improve this question asked Nov 23 '18 at 12:12 dan dan 152 4
Read more

Alcedinidae

Image
Alcedinidae Martin-pêcheur à dos bleu ( Alcedo azurea ) Classification (COI) Règne Animalia Embranchement Chordata Sous-embr. Vertebrata Classe Aves Ordre Coraciiformes Famille Alcedinidae Rafinesque, 1815 Les Alcédinidés ou Alcedinidae forment une famille d'oiseaux plus connus sous les noms de martins-pêcheurs et martins-chasseurs. Sommaire 1 Description 2 Répartition et habitat 3 Systématique 3.1 Liste alphabétique des genres 3.2 Liste des espèces 4 Chez les Anciens : l'alcyon 4.1 Étymologie (Littré) 4.2 Oiseau « fabuleux » ? 5 Notes 6 Articles connexes 7 Liens externes 7.1 Bibliographie Description | Ce sont des oiseaux compacts de taille petite à moyenne (10 à 46 cm), au bec droit et long, en forme de poignard. Leurs pattes sont courtes, et ils portent un plumage aux couleurs vives. Répartition et habitat | Cosmopolites, ils fréquentent surtout
Read more

Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]

Image
9 $begingroup$ This question already has an answer here: What happens if we put together a proton and an antineutron? 2 answers Is it theoretically possible to make a "deuterium" atom containing a proton and an antineutron in its nucleus? Would the strong nuclear force cause attraction between a proton and an antineutron? Would such a nucleus be stable, or would the proton somehow annihilate the antineutron when close enough? nuclear-physics antimatter share | cite | improve this question asked yesterday
Read more