We, Jim and I, went to the shop. OR We - Jim and I - went to the shop [on hold]












-2















Which of the two would be considered correct if not both.






grammaticality







share|improve this question







New contributor




Nigel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











put on hold as primarily opinion-based by Jason Bassford, J. Taylor, Robusto, Skooba, 9fyj'j55-8ujfr5yhjky-'tt6yhkjj 2 days ago


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.











  • 2





    Or "We (Jim and I) went to the shop".

    – AndyT
    2 days ago
















-2















Which of the two would be considered correct if not both.






grammaticality







share|improve this question







New contributor




Nigel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











put on hold as primarily opinion-based by Jason Bassford, J. Taylor, Robusto, Skooba, 9fyj'j55-8ujfr5yhjky-'tt6yhkjj 2 days ago


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.











  • 2





    Or "We (Jim and I) went to the shop".

    – AndyT
    2 days ago














-2












-2








-2








Which of the two would be considered correct if not both.






grammaticality







share|improve this question







New contributor




Nigel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












Which of the two would be considered correct if not both.






grammaticality




grammaticality






share|improve this question







New contributor




Nigel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




Nigel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




Nigel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 days ago









NigelNigel

1




1




New contributor




Nigel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Nigel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Nigel is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




put on hold as primarily opinion-based by Jason Bassford, J. Taylor, Robusto, Skooba, 9fyj'j55-8ujfr5yhjky-'tt6yhkjj 2 days ago


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.






put on hold as primarily opinion-based by Jason Bassford, J. Taylor, Robusto, Skooba, 9fyj'j55-8ujfr5yhjky-'tt6yhkjj 2 days ago


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.










  • 2





    Or "We (Jim and I) went to the shop".

    – AndyT
    2 days ago














  • 2





    Or "We (Jim and I) went to the shop".

    – AndyT
    2 days ago








2




2





Or "We (Jim and I) went to the shop".

– AndyT
2 days ago





Or "We (Jim and I) went to the shop".

– AndyT
2 days ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















-1














The 1st is perfect use for a business meeting in the UK






share|improve this answer








New contributor




Paul Mathew is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • Hi Paul, welcome to EL&U. This isn't a bad start, but it's too short: the system has flagged it as "low-quality because of its length and content." An answer on EL&U is expected to be authoritative, detailed, and explain why it is correct. It's best if you edit your answer to provide more information - e.g., why is it "perfect use"? However, given the low quality of the question itself, editing may not be worth the effort; you can always delete it instead. For further guidance, see How to Answer and take the EL&U Tour :-)

    – Chappo
    yesterday


















1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









-1














The 1st is perfect use for a business meeting in the UK






share|improve this answer








New contributor




Paul Mathew is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • Hi Paul, welcome to EL&U. This isn't a bad start, but it's too short: the system has flagged it as "low-quality because of its length and content." An answer on EL&U is expected to be authoritative, detailed, and explain why it is correct. It's best if you edit your answer to provide more information - e.g., why is it "perfect use"? However, given the low quality of the question itself, editing may not be worth the effort; you can always delete it instead. For further guidance, see How to Answer and take the EL&U Tour :-)

    – Chappo
    yesterday
















-1














The 1st is perfect use for a business meeting in the UK






share|improve this answer








New contributor




Paul Mathew is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • Hi Paul, welcome to EL&U. This isn't a bad start, but it's too short: the system has flagged it as "low-quality because of its length and content." An answer on EL&U is expected to be authoritative, detailed, and explain why it is correct. It's best if you edit your answer to provide more information - e.g., why is it "perfect use"? However, given the low quality of the question itself, editing may not be worth the effort; you can always delete it instead. For further guidance, see How to Answer and take the EL&U Tour :-)

    – Chappo
    yesterday














-1












-1








-1







The 1st is perfect use for a business meeting in the UK






share|improve this answer








New contributor




Paul Mathew is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










The 1st is perfect use for a business meeting in the UK







share|improve this answer








New contributor




Paul Mathew is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer






New contributor




Paul Mathew is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









answered 2 days ago









Paul MathewPaul Mathew

11




11




New contributor




Paul Mathew is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Paul Mathew is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Paul Mathew is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.













  • Hi Paul, welcome to EL&U. This isn't a bad start, but it's too short: the system has flagged it as "low-quality because of its length and content." An answer on EL&U is expected to be authoritative, detailed, and explain why it is correct. It's best if you edit your answer to provide more information - e.g., why is it "perfect use"? However, given the low quality of the question itself, editing may not be worth the effort; you can always delete it instead. For further guidance, see How to Answer and take the EL&U Tour :-)

    – Chappo
    yesterday



















  • Hi Paul, welcome to EL&U. This isn't a bad start, but it's too short: the system has flagged it as "low-quality because of its length and content." An answer on EL&U is expected to be authoritative, detailed, and explain why it is correct. It's best if you edit your answer to provide more information - e.g., why is it "perfect use"? However, given the low quality of the question itself, editing may not be worth the effort; you can always delete it instead. For further guidance, see How to Answer and take the EL&U Tour :-)

    – Chappo
    yesterday

















Hi Paul, welcome to EL&U. This isn't a bad start, but it's too short: the system has flagged it as "low-quality because of its length and content." An answer on EL&U is expected to be authoritative, detailed, and explain why it is correct. It's best if you edit your answer to provide more information - e.g., why is it "perfect use"? However, given the low quality of the question itself, editing may not be worth the effort; you can always delete it instead. For further guidance, see How to Answer and take the EL&U Tour :-)

– Chappo
yesterday





Hi Paul, welcome to EL&U. This isn't a bad start, but it's too short: the system has flagged it as "low-quality because of its length and content." An answer on EL&U is expected to be authoritative, detailed, and explain why it is correct. It's best if you edit your answer to provide more information - e.g., why is it "perfect use"? However, given the low quality of the question itself, editing may not be worth the effort; you can always delete it instead. For further guidance, see How to Answer and take the EL&U Tour :-)

– Chappo
yesterday



-

Popular posts from this blog

"Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

Image
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box; } 2 total noob sorry any help greatly appreciated. I keep getting this "Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'." heres my codes code one CREATE TABLE supplier ( supplierID INT PRIMARY KEY, ISBN INT FOREIGN KEY REFERENCES book(ISBN), price DECIMAL (5,2), ON UPDATE CASCADE, ON DELETE CASCADE, ); code two CREATE TABLE orders ( orderID INT PRIMARY KEY, customerID INT FOREIGN KEY REFERENCES customer(customerID), ISBN INT FOREIGN KEY REFERENCES book(ISBN), orderDate date, ON UPDATE CASCADE, ON DELETE CASCADE, ); Ive run out of stuff to try other than dumbing it down to uselessness.
Read more

Alcedinidae

Image
Alcedinidae Martin-pêcheur à dos bleu ( Alcedo azurea ) Classification (COI) Règne Animalia Embranchement Chordata Sous-embr. Vertebrata Classe Aves Ordre Coraciiformes Famille Alcedinidae Rafinesque, 1815 Les Alcédinidés ou Alcedinidae forment une famille d'oiseaux plus connus sous les noms de martins-pêcheurs et martins-chasseurs. Sommaire 1 Description 2 Répartition et habitat 3 Systématique 3.1 Liste alphabétique des genres 3.2 Liste des espèces 4 Chez les Anciens : l'alcyon 4.1 Étymologie (Littré) 4.2 Oiseau « fabuleux » ? 5 Notes 6 Articles connexes 7 Liens externes 7.1 Bibliographie Description | Ce sont des oiseaux compacts de taille petite à moyenne (10 à 46 cm), au bec droit et long, en forme de poignard. Leurs pattes sont courtes, et ils portent un plumage aux couleurs vives. Répartition et habitat | Cosmopolites, ils fréquentent surtout
Read more

RAC Tourist Trophy

Image
Pour les articles homonymes, voir Tourist Trophy. Le RAC Tourist Trophy est une course automobile organisée par le Royal Automobile Club d'Angleterre. Créée en 1905, cette course a fait partie des épreuves comptant pour le championnat du monde des voitures de sport entre 1953 et 1955, en 1958 et 1959, et entre 1962 et 1965. Après une interruption de 17 ans (l'épreuve s'arrête après 1988), le RAC Tourist Trophy reprend en 2005 sous l'égide de la FIA GT. Palmarès | John Napier sur Arrol-Johnston, vainqueur du premier RAC Tourist Trophy, en 1905. L'honorable C.S. Rolls, vainqueur du RAC Tourist Trophy 1906. Ernest Curtis, sur Rover 20 hp, vainqueur du RAC Tourist Trophy 1907. William Watson, vainqueur du RAC Tourist Trophy 1908. Kenelm Lee Guinness, vainqueur du RAC Tourist Trophy 1914 sur Sunbeam. Départ du RAC Tourist Trophy 1928. Louis Gérard, vainqueur du RAC Tourist Trophy 1938 sur Delage. Année Circuit Vainqueur
Read more