Is this statement correct? If yes, why? [on hold]












0















It's 2 p.m. now.
I was waiting for a bus for 2 hours this morning.






grammaticality







share|improve this question













put on hold as off-topic by Lawrence, tchrist♦ 2 days ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Proofreading questions are off-topic unless a specific source of concern in the text is clearly identified." – Lawrence, tchrist

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.














  • Why wouldn't it be correct? If you don't say why you think it's wrong, your question is going to be closed because it's proofreading. My guess is you think it should be waited rather than was waiting.

    – Peter Shor
    2 days ago













  • Yes, that's what I considered to be right because it's not too good to say 'I am waiting for you for 2 hours'...

    – gerol2000
    2 days ago











  • I was waiting for a bus for two hours this morning is perfectly grammatical, but you would probably use waited instead unless your next sentence was something like During that time, I saw seven busses pass my stop, all packed so full they couldn't hold any more passengers.

    – Peter Shor
    2 days ago













  • I have got it. Thank you. But I just can't figure out why in Present I should say 'I have waited/been waiting for '2 hours'.

    – gerol2000
    2 days ago











  • @gero2000: Because we don't use the present or present continuous tense in English when we have a past time indicator in the sentence. So you can say I am waiting for a bus, but you have to say I have been waiting for a bus for two hours. (And we generally use the present tense for stative verbs and habitual actions; I wait for a bus every day.)

    – Peter Shor
    2 days ago


















0















It's 2 p.m. now.
I was waiting for a bus for 2 hours this morning.






grammaticality







share|improve this question













put on hold as off-topic by Lawrence, tchrist♦ 2 days ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Proofreading questions are off-topic unless a specific source of concern in the text is clearly identified." – Lawrence, tchrist

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.














  • Why wouldn't it be correct? If you don't say why you think it's wrong, your question is going to be closed because it's proofreading. My guess is you think it should be waited rather than was waiting.

    – Peter Shor
    2 days ago













  • Yes, that's what I considered to be right because it's not too good to say 'I am waiting for you for 2 hours'...

    – gerol2000
    2 days ago











  • I was waiting for a bus for two hours this morning is perfectly grammatical, but you would probably use waited instead unless your next sentence was something like During that time, I saw seven busses pass my stop, all packed so full they couldn't hold any more passengers.

    – Peter Shor
    2 days ago













  • I have got it. Thank you. But I just can't figure out why in Present I should say 'I have waited/been waiting for '2 hours'.

    – gerol2000
    2 days ago











  • @gero2000: Because we don't use the present or present continuous tense in English when we have a past time indicator in the sentence. So you can say I am waiting for a bus, but you have to say I have been waiting for a bus for two hours. (And we generally use the present tense for stative verbs and habitual actions; I wait for a bus every day.)

    – Peter Shor
    2 days ago
















0












0








0








It's 2 p.m. now.
I was waiting for a bus for 2 hours this morning.






grammaticality







share|improve this question














It's 2 p.m. now.
I was waiting for a bus for 2 hours this morning.






grammaticality




grammaticality






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 2 days ago









gerol2000gerol2000

816




816




put on hold as off-topic by Lawrence, tchrist♦ 2 days ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Proofreading questions are off-topic unless a specific source of concern in the text is clearly identified." – Lawrence, tchrist

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




put on hold as off-topic by Lawrence, tchrist♦ 2 days ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Proofreading questions are off-topic unless a specific source of concern in the text is clearly identified." – Lawrence, tchrist

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • Why wouldn't it be correct? If you don't say why you think it's wrong, your question is going to be closed because it's proofreading. My guess is you think it should be waited rather than was waiting.

    – Peter Shor
    2 days ago













  • Yes, that's what I considered to be right because it's not too good to say 'I am waiting for you for 2 hours'...

    – gerol2000
    2 days ago











  • I was waiting for a bus for two hours this morning is perfectly grammatical, but you would probably use waited instead unless your next sentence was something like During that time, I saw seven busses pass my stop, all packed so full they couldn't hold any more passengers.

    – Peter Shor
    2 days ago













  • I have got it. Thank you. But I just can't figure out why in Present I should say 'I have waited/been waiting for '2 hours'.

    – gerol2000
    2 days ago











  • @gero2000: Because we don't use the present or present continuous tense in English when we have a past time indicator in the sentence. So you can say I am waiting for a bus, but you have to say I have been waiting for a bus for two hours. (And we generally use the present tense for stative verbs and habitual actions; I wait for a bus every day.)

    – Peter Shor
    2 days ago





















  • Why wouldn't it be correct? If you don't say why you think it's wrong, your question is going to be closed because it's proofreading. My guess is you think it should be waited rather than was waiting.

    – Peter Shor
    2 days ago













  • Yes, that's what I considered to be right because it's not too good to say 'I am waiting for you for 2 hours'...

    – gerol2000
    2 days ago











  • I was waiting for a bus for two hours this morning is perfectly grammatical, but you would probably use waited instead unless your next sentence was something like During that time, I saw seven busses pass my stop, all packed so full they couldn't hold any more passengers.

    – Peter Shor
    2 days ago













  • I have got it. Thank you. But I just can't figure out why in Present I should say 'I have waited/been waiting for '2 hours'.

    – gerol2000
    2 days ago











  • @gero2000: Because we don't use the present or present continuous tense in English when we have a past time indicator in the sentence. So you can say I am waiting for a bus, but you have to say I have been waiting for a bus for two hours. (And we generally use the present tense for stative verbs and habitual actions; I wait for a bus every day.)

    – Peter Shor
    2 days ago



















Why wouldn't it be correct? If you don't say why you think it's wrong, your question is going to be closed because it's proofreading. My guess is you think it should be waited rather than was waiting.

– Peter Shor
2 days ago







Why wouldn't it be correct? If you don't say why you think it's wrong, your question is going to be closed because it's proofreading. My guess is you think it should be waited rather than was waiting.

– Peter Shor
2 days ago















Yes, that's what I considered to be right because it's not too good to say 'I am waiting for you for 2 hours'...

– gerol2000
2 days ago





Yes, that's what I considered to be right because it's not too good to say 'I am waiting for you for 2 hours'...

– gerol2000
2 days ago













I was waiting for a bus for two hours this morning is perfectly grammatical, but you would probably use waited instead unless your next sentence was something like During that time, I saw seven busses pass my stop, all packed so full they couldn't hold any more passengers.

– Peter Shor
2 days ago







I was waiting for a bus for two hours this morning is perfectly grammatical, but you would probably use waited instead unless your next sentence was something like During that time, I saw seven busses pass my stop, all packed so full they couldn't hold any more passengers.

– Peter Shor
2 days ago















I have got it. Thank you. But I just can't figure out why in Present I should say 'I have waited/been waiting for '2 hours'.

– gerol2000
2 days ago





I have got it. Thank you. But I just can't figure out why in Present I should say 'I have waited/been waiting for '2 hours'.

– gerol2000
2 days ago













@gero2000: Because we don't use the present or present continuous tense in English when we have a past time indicator in the sentence. So you can say I am waiting for a bus, but you have to say I have been waiting for a bus for two hours. (And we generally use the present tense for stative verbs and habitual actions; I wait for a bus every day.)

– Peter Shor
2 days ago







@gero2000: Because we don't use the present or present continuous tense in English when we have a past time indicator in the sentence. So you can say I am waiting for a bus, but you have to say I have been waiting for a bus for two hours. (And we generally use the present tense for stative verbs and habitual actions; I wait for a bus every day.)

– Peter Shor
2 days ago












0






active

oldest

votes

















0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes

-

Popular posts from this blog

"Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

Image
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box; } 2 total noob sorry any help greatly appreciated. I keep getting this "Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'." heres my codes code one CREATE TABLE supplier ( supplierID INT PRIMARY KEY, ISBN INT FOREIGN KEY REFERENCES book(ISBN), price DECIMAL (5,2), ON UPDATE CASCADE, ON DELETE CASCADE, ); code two CREATE TABLE orders ( orderID INT PRIMARY KEY, customerID INT FOREIGN KEY REFERENCES customer(customerID), ISBN INT FOREIGN KEY REFERENCES book(ISBN), orderDate date, ON UPDATE CASCADE, ON DELETE CASCADE, ); Ive run out of stuff to try other than dumbing it down to uselessness.
Read more

Alcedinidae

Image
Alcedinidae Martin-pêcheur à dos bleu ( Alcedo azurea ) Classification (COI) Règne Animalia Embranchement Chordata Sous-embr. Vertebrata Classe Aves Ordre Coraciiformes Famille Alcedinidae Rafinesque, 1815 Les Alcédinidés ou Alcedinidae forment une famille d'oiseaux plus connus sous les noms de martins-pêcheurs et martins-chasseurs. Sommaire 1 Description 2 Répartition et habitat 3 Systématique 3.1 Liste alphabétique des genres 3.2 Liste des espèces 4 Chez les Anciens : l'alcyon 4.1 Étymologie (Littré) 4.2 Oiseau « fabuleux » ? 5 Notes 6 Articles connexes 7 Liens externes 7.1 Bibliographie Description | Ce sont des oiseaux compacts de taille petite à moyenne (10 à 46 cm), au bec droit et long, en forme de poignard. Leurs pattes sont courtes, et ils portent un plumage aux couleurs vives. Répartition et habitat | Cosmopolites, ils fréquentent surtout
Read more

RAC Tourist Trophy

Image
Pour les articles homonymes, voir Tourist Trophy. Le RAC Tourist Trophy est une course automobile organisée par le Royal Automobile Club d'Angleterre. Créée en 1905, cette course a fait partie des épreuves comptant pour le championnat du monde des voitures de sport entre 1953 et 1955, en 1958 et 1959, et entre 1962 et 1965. Après une interruption de 17 ans (l'épreuve s'arrête après 1988), le RAC Tourist Trophy reprend en 2005 sous l'égide de la FIA GT. Palmarès | John Napier sur Arrol-Johnston, vainqueur du premier RAC Tourist Trophy, en 1905. L'honorable C.S. Rolls, vainqueur du RAC Tourist Trophy 1906. Ernest Curtis, sur Rover 20 hp, vainqueur du RAC Tourist Trophy 1907. William Watson, vainqueur du RAC Tourist Trophy 1908. Kenelm Lee Guinness, vainqueur du RAC Tourist Trophy 1914 sur Sunbeam. Départ du RAC Tourist Trophy 1928. Louis Gérard, vainqueur du RAC Tourist Trophy 1938 sur Delage. Année Circuit Vainqueur
Read more