How to label equation with particular format?
I have several equations, I want to label equation 1 and 2 to be (eqt1) and (eqt2), any other equations after it use normal equation number, say (1), (2), (3),... How to do it in latex?
E.g.
begin{align}
1+1=2 (eqt1)
end{align}
begin{align}
2+3=5 (eqt2)
end{align}
begin{align}
3+3=6 (1)
end{align}
begin{align}
4+3=7 (2)
end{align}
equations numbering
New contributor
|
show 3 more comments
I have several equations, I want to label equation 1 and 2 to be (eqt1) and (eqt2), any other equations after it use normal equation number, say (1), (2), (3),... How to do it in latex?
E.g.
begin{align}
1+1=2 (eqt1)
end{align}
begin{align}
2+3=5 (eqt2)
end{align}
begin{align}
3+3=6 (1)
end{align}
begin{align}
4+3=7 (2)
end{align}
equations numbering
New contributor
That's the work fortag{hello}
– JouleV
2 days ago
please have a look at tex.stackexchange.com/questions/28894/modify-eqref-command
– Yorgos
2 days ago
@Yorgos We can straightaway achieve it withtag{...}
(which is part ofamsmath
package) to customise thelabel
of equations and then use the normal way of cross-referencing the equations witheqref{...}
.
– Raaja
2 days ago
1
@Raaja oo nice... i didn't know this command, since i am usingmathtools
instead ofamsmath
– Yorgos
2 days ago
@Yorgos [Fun-fact] It is applicable formathtools
as well ;)
– Raaja
2 days ago
|
show 3 more comments
I have several equations, I want to label equation 1 and 2 to be (eqt1) and (eqt2), any other equations after it use normal equation number, say (1), (2), (3),... How to do it in latex?
E.g.
begin{align}
1+1=2 (eqt1)
end{align}
begin{align}
2+3=5 (eqt2)
end{align}
begin{align}
3+3=6 (1)
end{align}
begin{align}
4+3=7 (2)
end{align}
equations numbering
New contributor
I have several equations, I want to label equation 1 and 2 to be (eqt1) and (eqt2), any other equations after it use normal equation number, say (1), (2), (3),... How to do it in latex?
E.g.
begin{align}
1+1=2 (eqt1)
end{align}
begin{align}
2+3=5 (eqt2)
end{align}
begin{align}
3+3=6 (1)
end{align}
begin{align}
4+3=7 (2)
end{align}
equations numbering
equations numbering
New contributor
New contributor
edited 2 days ago
Raaja
2,4552732
2,4552732
New contributor
asked 2 days ago
will_cheukwill_cheuk
161
161
New contributor
New contributor
That's the work fortag{hello}
– JouleV
2 days ago
please have a look at tex.stackexchange.com/questions/28894/modify-eqref-command
– Yorgos
2 days ago
@Yorgos We can straightaway achieve it withtag{...}
(which is part ofamsmath
package) to customise thelabel
of equations and then use the normal way of cross-referencing the equations witheqref{...}
.
– Raaja
2 days ago
1
@Raaja oo nice... i didn't know this command, since i am usingmathtools
instead ofamsmath
– Yorgos
2 days ago
@Yorgos [Fun-fact] It is applicable formathtools
as well ;)
– Raaja
2 days ago
|
show 3 more comments
That's the work fortag{hello}
– JouleV
2 days ago
please have a look at tex.stackexchange.com/questions/28894/modify-eqref-command
– Yorgos
2 days ago
@Yorgos We can straightaway achieve it withtag{...}
(which is part ofamsmath
package) to customise thelabel
of equations and then use the normal way of cross-referencing the equations witheqref{...}
.
– Raaja
2 days ago
1
@Raaja oo nice... i didn't know this command, since i am usingmathtools
instead ofamsmath
– Yorgos
2 days ago
@Yorgos [Fun-fact] It is applicable formathtools
as well ;)
– Raaja
2 days ago
That's the work for
tag{hello}
– JouleV
2 days ago
That's the work for
tag{hello}
– JouleV
2 days ago
please have a look at tex.stackexchange.com/questions/28894/modify-eqref-command
– Yorgos
2 days ago
please have a look at tex.stackexchange.com/questions/28894/modify-eqref-command
– Yorgos
2 days ago
@Yorgos We can straightaway achieve it with
tag{...}
(which is part of amsmath
package) to customise the label
of equations and then use the normal way of cross-referencing the equations with eqref{...}
.– Raaja
2 days ago
@Yorgos We can straightaway achieve it with
tag{...}
(which is part of amsmath
package) to customise the label
of equations and then use the normal way of cross-referencing the equations with eqref{...}
.– Raaja
2 days ago
1
1
@Raaja oo nice... i didn't know this command, since i am using
mathtools
instead of amsmath
– Yorgos
2 days ago
@Raaja oo nice... i didn't know this command, since i am using
mathtools
instead of amsmath
– Yorgos
2 days ago
@Yorgos [Fun-fact] It is applicable for
mathtools
as well ;)– Raaja
2 days ago
@Yorgos [Fun-fact] It is applicable for
mathtools
as well ;)– Raaja
2 days ago
|
show 3 more comments
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
With amsmath
package, you can achieve it with tag
environment.
documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{align}
label{e1} 1+1=2 tag{eqt1}
end{align}
begin{align}
label{e2} 2+3=5 tag{eqt2}
end{align}
begin{align}
label{e3} 3+3=6
end{align}
begin{align}
label{e4} 4+3=7
end{align}
I am referring eqref{e1}, eqref{e2}, eqref{e3}, eqref{e4}.
end{document}
Which would give you
add a comment |
Another possibility, using the same equation counter as the default: mathtools
has a newtagform
command, which can be used to customise the appearance of the equation number, and a usetagform
command which can be used within the document body:
documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
newtagform{eqt}{(eqt,}{)}
begin{document}
usetagform{eqt}
begin{align}
label{e1} 1+1=2
end{align}
begin{align}
label{e2} 2+3=5
end{align}
usetagform{default}
begin{align}
label{e3} 3+3=6
end{align}
begin{align}
label{e4} 4+3=7
end{align}
end{document}
The OP asked for(eqt1), (eqt2), (1), (2)
. You have given them(eqt1), (eqt2), (3), (4)
. You would need to reset the counter after(eqt2)
to give the behaviour asked for
– lioness99a
2 days ago
1
This was not quite clear to me. I indeed mentioned that in what I propose, both types of equation share the same counter – only the formatting differs.
– Bernard
2 days ago
They said they wanted to have(eqt1)
and(eqt2)
and then start counting from(1)
again. Your answer continues counting after(eqt2)
with(3)
so you need to includesetcounter{equation}{0}
at that point to get the behaviour the OP wanted
– lioness99a
2 days ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
will_cheuk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f469677%2fhow-to-label-equation-with-particular-format%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
With amsmath
package, you can achieve it with tag
environment.
documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{align}
label{e1} 1+1=2 tag{eqt1}
end{align}
begin{align}
label{e2} 2+3=5 tag{eqt2}
end{align}
begin{align}
label{e3} 3+3=6
end{align}
begin{align}
label{e4} 4+3=7
end{align}
I am referring eqref{e1}, eqref{e2}, eqref{e3}, eqref{e4}.
end{document}
Which would give you
add a comment |
With amsmath
package, you can achieve it with tag
environment.
documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{align}
label{e1} 1+1=2 tag{eqt1}
end{align}
begin{align}
label{e2} 2+3=5 tag{eqt2}
end{align}
begin{align}
label{e3} 3+3=6
end{align}
begin{align}
label{e4} 4+3=7
end{align}
I am referring eqref{e1}, eqref{e2}, eqref{e3}, eqref{e4}.
end{document}
Which would give you
add a comment |
With amsmath
package, you can achieve it with tag
environment.
documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{align}
label{e1} 1+1=2 tag{eqt1}
end{align}
begin{align}
label{e2} 2+3=5 tag{eqt2}
end{align}
begin{align}
label{e3} 3+3=6
end{align}
begin{align}
label{e4} 4+3=7
end{align}
I am referring eqref{e1}, eqref{e2}, eqref{e3}, eqref{e4}.
end{document}
Which would give you
With amsmath
package, you can achieve it with tag
environment.
documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{align}
label{e1} 1+1=2 tag{eqt1}
end{align}
begin{align}
label{e2} 2+3=5 tag{eqt2}
end{align}
begin{align}
label{e3} 3+3=6
end{align}
begin{align}
label{e4} 4+3=7
end{align}
I am referring eqref{e1}, eqref{e2}, eqref{e3}, eqref{e4}.
end{document}
Which would give you
answered 2 days ago
RaajaRaaja
2,4552732
2,4552732
add a comment |
add a comment |
Another possibility, using the same equation counter as the default: mathtools
has a newtagform
command, which can be used to customise the appearance of the equation number, and a usetagform
command which can be used within the document body:
documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
newtagform{eqt}{(eqt,}{)}
begin{document}
usetagform{eqt}
begin{align}
label{e1} 1+1=2
end{align}
begin{align}
label{e2} 2+3=5
end{align}
usetagform{default}
begin{align}
label{e3} 3+3=6
end{align}
begin{align}
label{e4} 4+3=7
end{align}
end{document}
The OP asked for(eqt1), (eqt2), (1), (2)
. You have given them(eqt1), (eqt2), (3), (4)
. You would need to reset the counter after(eqt2)
to give the behaviour asked for
– lioness99a
2 days ago
1
This was not quite clear to me. I indeed mentioned that in what I propose, both types of equation share the same counter – only the formatting differs.
– Bernard
2 days ago
They said they wanted to have(eqt1)
and(eqt2)
and then start counting from(1)
again. Your answer continues counting after(eqt2)
with(3)
so you need to includesetcounter{equation}{0}
at that point to get the behaviour the OP wanted
– lioness99a
2 days ago
add a comment |
Another possibility, using the same equation counter as the default: mathtools
has a newtagform
command, which can be used to customise the appearance of the equation number, and a usetagform
command which can be used within the document body:
documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
newtagform{eqt}{(eqt,}{)}
begin{document}
usetagform{eqt}
begin{align}
label{e1} 1+1=2
end{align}
begin{align}
label{e2} 2+3=5
end{align}
usetagform{default}
begin{align}
label{e3} 3+3=6
end{align}
begin{align}
label{e4} 4+3=7
end{align}
end{document}
The OP asked for(eqt1), (eqt2), (1), (2)
. You have given them(eqt1), (eqt2), (3), (4)
. You would need to reset the counter after(eqt2)
to give the behaviour asked for
– lioness99a
2 days ago
1
This was not quite clear to me. I indeed mentioned that in what I propose, both types of equation share the same counter – only the formatting differs.
– Bernard
2 days ago
They said they wanted to have(eqt1)
and(eqt2)
and then start counting from(1)
again. Your answer continues counting after(eqt2)
with(3)
so you need to includesetcounter{equation}{0}
at that point to get the behaviour the OP wanted
– lioness99a
2 days ago
add a comment |
Another possibility, using the same equation counter as the default: mathtools
has a newtagform
command, which can be used to customise the appearance of the equation number, and a usetagform
command which can be used within the document body:
documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
newtagform{eqt}{(eqt,}{)}
begin{document}
usetagform{eqt}
begin{align}
label{e1} 1+1=2
end{align}
begin{align}
label{e2} 2+3=5
end{align}
usetagform{default}
begin{align}
label{e3} 3+3=6
end{align}
begin{align}
label{e4} 4+3=7
end{align}
end{document}
Another possibility, using the same equation counter as the default: mathtools
has a newtagform
command, which can be used to customise the appearance of the equation number, and a usetagform
command which can be used within the document body:
documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
newtagform{eqt}{(eqt,}{)}
begin{document}
usetagform{eqt}
begin{align}
label{e1} 1+1=2
end{align}
begin{align}
label{e2} 2+3=5
end{align}
usetagform{default}
begin{align}
label{e3} 3+3=6
end{align}
begin{align}
label{e4} 4+3=7
end{align}
end{document}
edited 2 days ago
Raaja
2,4552732
2,4552732
answered 2 days ago
BernardBernard
167k769194
167k769194
The OP asked for(eqt1), (eqt2), (1), (2)
. You have given them(eqt1), (eqt2), (3), (4)
. You would need to reset the counter after(eqt2)
to give the behaviour asked for
– lioness99a
2 days ago
1
This was not quite clear to me. I indeed mentioned that in what I propose, both types of equation share the same counter – only the formatting differs.
– Bernard
2 days ago
They said they wanted to have(eqt1)
and(eqt2)
and then start counting from(1)
again. Your answer continues counting after(eqt2)
with(3)
so you need to includesetcounter{equation}{0}
at that point to get the behaviour the OP wanted
– lioness99a
2 days ago
add a comment |
The OP asked for(eqt1), (eqt2), (1), (2)
. You have given them(eqt1), (eqt2), (3), (4)
. You would need to reset the counter after(eqt2)
to give the behaviour asked for
– lioness99a
2 days ago
1
This was not quite clear to me. I indeed mentioned that in what I propose, both types of equation share the same counter – only the formatting differs.
– Bernard
2 days ago
They said they wanted to have(eqt1)
and(eqt2)
and then start counting from(1)
again. Your answer continues counting after(eqt2)
with(3)
so you need to includesetcounter{equation}{0}
at that point to get the behaviour the OP wanted
– lioness99a
2 days ago
The OP asked for
(eqt1), (eqt2), (1), (2)
. You have given them (eqt1), (eqt2), (3), (4)
. You would need to reset the counter after (eqt2)
to give the behaviour asked for– lioness99a
2 days ago
The OP asked for
(eqt1), (eqt2), (1), (2)
. You have given them (eqt1), (eqt2), (3), (4)
. You would need to reset the counter after (eqt2)
to give the behaviour asked for– lioness99a
2 days ago
1
1
This was not quite clear to me. I indeed mentioned that in what I propose, both types of equation share the same counter – only the formatting differs.
– Bernard
2 days ago
This was not quite clear to me. I indeed mentioned that in what I propose, both types of equation share the same counter – only the formatting differs.
– Bernard
2 days ago
They said they wanted to have
(eqt1)
and (eqt2)
and then start counting from (1)
again. Your answer continues counting after (eqt2)
with (3)
so you need to include setcounter{equation}{0}
at that point to get the behaviour the OP wanted– lioness99a
2 days ago
They said they wanted to have
(eqt1)
and (eqt2)
and then start counting from (1)
again. Your answer continues counting after (eqt2)
with (3)
so you need to include setcounter{equation}{0}
at that point to get the behaviour the OP wanted– lioness99a
2 days ago
add a comment |
will_cheuk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
will_cheuk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
will_cheuk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
will_cheuk is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f469677%2fhow-to-label-equation-with-particular-format%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
That's the work for
tag{hello}
– JouleV
2 days ago
please have a look at tex.stackexchange.com/questions/28894/modify-eqref-command
– Yorgos
2 days ago
@Yorgos We can straightaway achieve it with
tag{...}
(which is part ofamsmath
package) to customise thelabel
of equations and then use the normal way of cross-referencing the equations witheqref{...}
.– Raaja
2 days ago
1
@Raaja oo nice... i didn't know this command, since i am using
mathtools
instead ofamsmath
– Yorgos
2 days ago
@Yorgos [Fun-fact] It is applicable for
mathtools
as well ;)– Raaja
2 days ago