Openstack HEAT condition for resource properties












0















"Conditions (..) They can be associated with resources and resource properties in the resources section (..)" - as the official openstack's docs said I can do that. But attached examples do not contains these with "resource properties".



I have my example, when user can set parameter to NOT create port2 AND not attach port2 (because port2 does not exist):



parameters:
global_port2_create:
description: Do you want eth1 (port2)
type: string
default: true

conditions:
create_port2: {equals : [{get_param: global_port2_create}, "true"]}

resources:
node_port1:
type: OS::Neutron::Port
properties:
network_id: {get_param: global_port1_net_id }
fixed_ips:
- subnet_id: {get_param: global_port1_net_id }
- ip_address: {get_param: node_port1_ip }
security_groups: {get_param: global_port1_security_groups_ids}
node_port2:
type: OS::Neutron::Port
condition: create_port2
properties:
network_id: {get_param: global_port_net_id }
fixed_ips:
- subnet_id: {get_param: global_port2_net_id }
- ip_address: {get_param: node5_port2_ip }
security_groups: {get_param: global_port2_security_groups_ids}
node5_server:
type: OS::Nova::Server
depends_on: [ node5_port1, node5_port2 ]
properties:
name: some_name
image: { get_param: global_image }
availability_zone: some_az
networks:
- port: { get_resource: node5_port1 }
- port: { get_resource: node5_port2 } #How to use a condition here?


I know, i can do a ResourceGroup with both ports and iterate them, but I do not want this resolution.
Maybe like this?



      networks:
- port: { get_resource: node5_port1 }
- port:
condition: create_port2
get_resource: node5_port2


Anyone have any ideas how to accomplish this?










share|improve this question



























    0















    "Conditions (..) They can be associated with resources and resource properties in the resources section (..)" - as the official openstack's docs said I can do that. But attached examples do not contains these with "resource properties".



    I have my example, when user can set parameter to NOT create port2 AND not attach port2 (because port2 does not exist):



    parameters:
    global_port2_create:
    description: Do you want eth1 (port2)
    type: string
    default: true

    conditions:
    create_port2: {equals : [{get_param: global_port2_create}, "true"]}

    resources:
    node_port1:
    type: OS::Neutron::Port
    properties:
    network_id: {get_param: global_port1_net_id }
    fixed_ips:
    - subnet_id: {get_param: global_port1_net_id }
    - ip_address: {get_param: node_port1_ip }
    security_groups: {get_param: global_port1_security_groups_ids}
    node_port2:
    type: OS::Neutron::Port
    condition: create_port2
    properties:
    network_id: {get_param: global_port_net_id }
    fixed_ips:
    - subnet_id: {get_param: global_port2_net_id }
    - ip_address: {get_param: node5_port2_ip }
    security_groups: {get_param: global_port2_security_groups_ids}
    node5_server:
    type: OS::Nova::Server
    depends_on: [ node5_port1, node5_port2 ]
    properties:
    name: some_name
    image: { get_param: global_image }
    availability_zone: some_az
    networks:
    - port: { get_resource: node5_port1 }
    - port: { get_resource: node5_port2 } #How to use a condition here?


    I know, i can do a ResourceGroup with both ports and iterate them, but I do not want this resolution.
    Maybe like this?



          networks:
    - port: { get_resource: node5_port1 }
    - port:
    condition: create_port2
    get_resource: node5_port2


    Anyone have any ideas how to accomplish this?










    share|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0








      "Conditions (..) They can be associated with resources and resource properties in the resources section (..)" - as the official openstack's docs said I can do that. But attached examples do not contains these with "resource properties".



      I have my example, when user can set parameter to NOT create port2 AND not attach port2 (because port2 does not exist):



      parameters:
      global_port2_create:
      description: Do you want eth1 (port2)
      type: string
      default: true

      conditions:
      create_port2: {equals : [{get_param: global_port2_create}, "true"]}

      resources:
      node_port1:
      type: OS::Neutron::Port
      properties:
      network_id: {get_param: global_port1_net_id }
      fixed_ips:
      - subnet_id: {get_param: global_port1_net_id }
      - ip_address: {get_param: node_port1_ip }
      security_groups: {get_param: global_port1_security_groups_ids}
      node_port2:
      type: OS::Neutron::Port
      condition: create_port2
      properties:
      network_id: {get_param: global_port_net_id }
      fixed_ips:
      - subnet_id: {get_param: global_port2_net_id }
      - ip_address: {get_param: node5_port2_ip }
      security_groups: {get_param: global_port2_security_groups_ids}
      node5_server:
      type: OS::Nova::Server
      depends_on: [ node5_port1, node5_port2 ]
      properties:
      name: some_name
      image: { get_param: global_image }
      availability_zone: some_az
      networks:
      - port: { get_resource: node5_port1 }
      - port: { get_resource: node5_port2 } #How to use a condition here?


      I know, i can do a ResourceGroup with both ports and iterate them, but I do not want this resolution.
      Maybe like this?



            networks:
      - port: { get_resource: node5_port1 }
      - port:
      condition: create_port2
      get_resource: node5_port2


      Anyone have any ideas how to accomplish this?










      share|improve this question














      "Conditions (..) They can be associated with resources and resource properties in the resources section (..)" - as the official openstack's docs said I can do that. But attached examples do not contains these with "resource properties".



      I have my example, when user can set parameter to NOT create port2 AND not attach port2 (because port2 does not exist):



      parameters:
      global_port2_create:
      description: Do you want eth1 (port2)
      type: string
      default: true

      conditions:
      create_port2: {equals : [{get_param: global_port2_create}, "true"]}

      resources:
      node_port1:
      type: OS::Neutron::Port
      properties:
      network_id: {get_param: global_port1_net_id }
      fixed_ips:
      - subnet_id: {get_param: global_port1_net_id }
      - ip_address: {get_param: node_port1_ip }
      security_groups: {get_param: global_port1_security_groups_ids}
      node_port2:
      type: OS::Neutron::Port
      condition: create_port2
      properties:
      network_id: {get_param: global_port_net_id }
      fixed_ips:
      - subnet_id: {get_param: global_port2_net_id }
      - ip_address: {get_param: node5_port2_ip }
      security_groups: {get_param: global_port2_security_groups_ids}
      node5_server:
      type: OS::Nova::Server
      depends_on: [ node5_port1, node5_port2 ]
      properties:
      name: some_name
      image: { get_param: global_image }
      availability_zone: some_az
      networks:
      - port: { get_resource: node5_port1 }
      - port: { get_resource: node5_port2 } #How to use a condition here?


      I know, i can do a ResourceGroup with both ports and iterate them, but I do not want this resolution.
      Maybe like this?



            networks:
      - port: { get_resource: node5_port1 }
      - port:
      condition: create_port2
      get_resource: node5_port2


      Anyone have any ideas how to accomplish this?







      openstack openstack-heat






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 20 '18 at 21:14









      ProximmProximm

      112




      112
























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53401627%2fopenstack-heat-condition-for-resource-properties%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53401627%2fopenstack-heat-condition-for-resource-properties%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          "Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

          Alcedinidae

          Origin of the phrase “under your belt”?