Want to remove unnecessary message












2












$begingroup$


Manipulate[

  ParametricPlot[{t, t}, {t, 0, s}],

  {s, 0, 1, 0.1}]


This code is working in Mathematica, but generates messages (ParametricPlot::plld). I tried Quiet, but result was still the same.



I looked at Off, but not understand how to use it.






plotting error







share|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The reason for the message is that ParametricPlot[{0,0}] doesn't work. If you do something like Manipulate[ParametricPlot[{t, t}, {t, 0, s}], {s, 0.001, 1, 0.1}] instead (note the s initial value to 0.001) it will stop issuing the message.
    $endgroup$
    – Carl Lange
    2 days ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The bigger question here is why does Quiet[ParametricPlot[{t, t}, {t, 0, s}]]; issue a message?
    $endgroup$
    – Jason B.
    2 days ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think it's because it evaluates inside the Quiet, comes back unevaluated, then reevaluates upon return. Try f /; (Print[1]; 1/0) = Null; Quiet[f].
    $endgroup$
    – Chip Hurst
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate: mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/120868/…
    $endgroup$
    – Michael E2
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    Perhaps this might be a helpful example: Manipulate[ ParametricPlot[{Sin[2 t], Cos[3 t]}, {t, 0, 2 Pi}, Mesh -> {{s}}, MeshStyle -> Red, MeshShading -> {ColorData[97][1], None}, PlotRange -> 1], {s, 0, 2 Pi}]
    $endgroup$
    – Michael E2
    2 days ago
















2












$begingroup$


Manipulate[

  ParametricPlot[{t, t}, {t, 0, s}],

  {s, 0, 1, 0.1}]


This code is working in Mathematica, but generates messages (ParametricPlot::plld). I tried Quiet, but result was still the same.



I looked at Off, but not understand how to use it.






plotting error







share|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The reason for the message is that ParametricPlot[{0,0}] doesn't work. If you do something like Manipulate[ParametricPlot[{t, t}, {t, 0, s}], {s, 0.001, 1, 0.1}] instead (note the s initial value to 0.001) it will stop issuing the message.
    $endgroup$
    – Carl Lange
    2 days ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The bigger question here is why does Quiet[ParametricPlot[{t, t}, {t, 0, s}]]; issue a message?
    $endgroup$
    – Jason B.
    2 days ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think it's because it evaluates inside the Quiet, comes back unevaluated, then reevaluates upon return. Try f /; (Print[1]; 1/0) = Null; Quiet[f].
    $endgroup$
    – Chip Hurst
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate: mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/120868/…
    $endgroup$
    – Michael E2
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    Perhaps this might be a helpful example: Manipulate[ ParametricPlot[{Sin[2 t], Cos[3 t]}, {t, 0, 2 Pi}, Mesh -> {{s}}, MeshStyle -> Red, MeshShading -> {ColorData[97][1], None}, PlotRange -> 1], {s, 0, 2 Pi}]
    $endgroup$
    – Michael E2
    2 days ago














2












2








2





$begingroup$


Manipulate[

  ParametricPlot[{t, t}, {t, 0, s}],

  {s, 0, 1, 0.1}]


This code is working in Mathematica, but generates messages (ParametricPlot::plld). I tried Quiet, but result was still the same.



I looked at Off, but not understand how to use it.






plotting error







share|improve this question











$endgroup$




Manipulate[

  ParametricPlot[{t, t}, {t, 0, s}],

  {s, 0, 1, 0.1}]


This code is working in Mathematica, but generates messages (ParametricPlot::plld). I tried Quiet, but result was still the same.



I looked at Off, but not understand how to use it.






plotting error




plotting error






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 days ago









Michael E2

146k12197469




146k12197469










asked 2 days ago









GoldyGoldy

1652




1652












  • $begingroup$
    The reason for the message is that ParametricPlot[{0,0}] doesn't work. If you do something like Manipulate[ParametricPlot[{t, t}, {t, 0, s}], {s, 0.001, 1, 0.1}] instead (note the s initial value to 0.001) it will stop issuing the message.
    $endgroup$
    – Carl Lange
    2 days ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The bigger question here is why does Quiet[ParametricPlot[{t, t}, {t, 0, s}]]; issue a message?
    $endgroup$
    – Jason B.
    2 days ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think it's because it evaluates inside the Quiet, comes back unevaluated, then reevaluates upon return. Try f /; (Print[1]; 1/0) = Null; Quiet[f].
    $endgroup$
    – Chip Hurst
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate: mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/120868/…
    $endgroup$
    – Michael E2
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    Perhaps this might be a helpful example: Manipulate[ ParametricPlot[{Sin[2 t], Cos[3 t]}, {t, 0, 2 Pi}, Mesh -> {{s}}, MeshStyle -> Red, MeshShading -> {ColorData[97][1], None}, PlotRange -> 1], {s, 0, 2 Pi}]
    $endgroup$
    – Michael E2
    2 days ago


















  • $begingroup$
    The reason for the message is that ParametricPlot[{0,0}] doesn't work. If you do something like Manipulate[ParametricPlot[{t, t}, {t, 0, s}], {s, 0.001, 1, 0.1}] instead (note the s initial value to 0.001) it will stop issuing the message.
    $endgroup$
    – Carl Lange
    2 days ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The bigger question here is why does Quiet[ParametricPlot[{t, t}, {t, 0, s}]]; issue a message?
    $endgroup$
    – Jason B.
    2 days ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think it's because it evaluates inside the Quiet, comes back unevaluated, then reevaluates upon return. Try f /; (Print[1]; 1/0) = Null; Quiet[f].
    $endgroup$
    – Chip Hurst
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate: mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/120868/…
    $endgroup$
    – Michael E2
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    Perhaps this might be a helpful example: Manipulate[ ParametricPlot[{Sin[2 t], Cos[3 t]}, {t, 0, 2 Pi}, Mesh -> {{s}}, MeshStyle -> Red, MeshShading -> {ColorData[97][1], None}, PlotRange -> 1], {s, 0, 2 Pi}]
    $endgroup$
    – Michael E2
    2 days ago
















$begingroup$
The reason for the message is that ParametricPlot[{0,0}] doesn't work. If you do something like Manipulate[ParametricPlot[{t, t}, {t, 0, s}], {s, 0.001, 1, 0.1}] instead (note the s initial value to 0.001) it will stop issuing the message.
$endgroup$
– Carl Lange
2 days ago




$begingroup$
The reason for the message is that ParametricPlot[{0,0}] doesn't work. If you do something like Manipulate[ParametricPlot[{t, t}, {t, 0, s}], {s, 0.001, 1, 0.1}] instead (note the s initial value to 0.001) it will stop issuing the message.
$endgroup$
– Carl Lange
2 days ago




2




2




$begingroup$
The bigger question here is why does Quiet[ParametricPlot[{t, t}, {t, 0, s}]]; issue a message?
$endgroup$
– Jason B.
2 days ago




$begingroup$
The bigger question here is why does Quiet[ParametricPlot[{t, t}, {t, 0, s}]]; issue a message?
$endgroup$
– Jason B.
2 days ago




1




1




$begingroup$
I think it's because it evaluates inside the Quiet, comes back unevaluated, then reevaluates upon return. Try f /; (Print[1]; 1/0) = Null; Quiet[f].
$endgroup$
– Chip Hurst
2 days ago




$begingroup$
I think it's because it evaluates inside the Quiet, comes back unevaluated, then reevaluates upon return. Try f /; (Print[1]; 1/0) = Null; Quiet[f].
$endgroup$
– Chip Hurst
2 days ago












$begingroup$
Possible duplicate: mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/120868/…
$endgroup$
– Michael E2
2 days ago




$begingroup$
Possible duplicate: mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/120868/…
$endgroup$
– Michael E2
2 days ago












$begingroup$
Perhaps this might be a helpful example: Manipulate[ ParametricPlot[{Sin[2 t], Cos[3 t]}, {t, 0, 2 Pi}, Mesh -> {{s}}, MeshStyle -> Red, MeshShading -> {ColorData[97][1], None}, PlotRange -> 1], {s, 0, 2 Pi}]
$endgroup$
– Michael E2
2 days ago




$begingroup$
Perhaps this might be a helpful example: Manipulate[ ParametricPlot[{Sin[2 t], Cos[3 t]}, {t, 0, 2 Pi}, Mesh -> {{s}}, MeshStyle -> Red, MeshShading -> {ColorData[97][1], None}, PlotRange -> 1], {s, 0, 2 Pi}]
$endgroup$
– Michael E2
2 days ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















6












$begingroup$

The error message is




ParametricPlot: Endpoints for t [...] must have distinct machine-precision numerical values.




The endpoints for t are 0 and s, so when s is 0, ParametricPlot tries to plot t from 0 to 0 and produces this message.



You can solve the problem by setting the lower bound of s to a value strictly larger than 0:



Manipulate[ParametricPlot[{t,t},{t,0,s}],{s,0.1,1,0.1}]]





share|improve this answer








New contributor




Armavica is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "387"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f190189%2fwant-to-remove-unnecessary-message%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    6












    $begingroup$

    The error message is




    ParametricPlot: Endpoints for t [...] must have distinct machine-precision numerical values.




    The endpoints for t are 0 and s, so when s is 0, ParametricPlot tries to plot t from 0 to 0 and produces this message.



    You can solve the problem by setting the lower bound of s to a value strictly larger than 0:



    Manipulate[ParametricPlot[{t,t},{t,0,s}],{s,0.1,1,0.1}]]





    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Armavica is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$


















      6












      $begingroup$

      The error message is




      ParametricPlot: Endpoints for t [...] must have distinct machine-precision numerical values.




      The endpoints for t are 0 and s, so when s is 0, ParametricPlot tries to plot t from 0 to 0 and produces this message.



      You can solve the problem by setting the lower bound of s to a value strictly larger than 0:



      Manipulate[ParametricPlot[{t,t},{t,0,s}],{s,0.1,1,0.1}]]





      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      Armavica is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      $endgroup$
















        6












        6








        6





        $begingroup$

        The error message is




        ParametricPlot: Endpoints for t [...] must have distinct machine-precision numerical values.




        The endpoints for t are 0 and s, so when s is 0, ParametricPlot tries to plot t from 0 to 0 and produces this message.



        You can solve the problem by setting the lower bound of s to a value strictly larger than 0:



        Manipulate[ParametricPlot[{t,t},{t,0,s}],{s,0.1,1,0.1}]]





        share|improve this answer








        New contributor




        Armavica is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        $endgroup$



        The error message is




        ParametricPlot: Endpoints for t [...] must have distinct machine-precision numerical values.




        The endpoints for t are 0 and s, so when s is 0, ParametricPlot tries to plot t from 0 to 0 and produces this message.



        You can solve the problem by setting the lower bound of s to a value strictly larger than 0:



        Manipulate[ParametricPlot[{t,t},{t,0,s}],{s,0.1,1,0.1}]]






        share|improve this answer








        New contributor




        Armavica is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer






        New contributor




        Armavica is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        answered 2 days ago









        ArmavicaArmavica

        762




        762




        New contributor




        Armavica is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





        New contributor





        Armavica is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        Armavica is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f190189%2fwant-to-remove-unnecessary-message%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            If I really need a card on my start hand, how many mulligans make sense? [duplicate]

            Image
            5 This question already has an answer here: How do you calculate the likelihood of drawing certain cards in your opening hand? 3 answers There is a funny modern deck where you play Treasure Hunt, but you really need to have it on the starting hand. How many mulligans should I take, if my deck contains 60 cards and contains 4 copies of Treasure Hunt? magic-the-gathering probability share | improve this question asked Nov 23 '18 at 12:12 dan dan 152 4
            Read more

            Alcedinidae

            Image
            Alcedinidae Martin-pêcheur à dos bleu ( Alcedo azurea ) Classification (COI) Règne Animalia Embranchement Chordata Sous-embr. Vertebrata Classe Aves Ordre Coraciiformes Famille Alcedinidae Rafinesque, 1815 Les Alcédinidés ou Alcedinidae forment une famille d'oiseaux plus connus sous les noms de martins-pêcheurs et martins-chasseurs. Sommaire 1 Description 2 Répartition et habitat 3 Systématique 3.1 Liste alphabétique des genres 3.2 Liste des espèces 4 Chez les Anciens : l'alcyon 4.1 Étymologie (Littré) 4.2 Oiseau « fabuleux » ? 5 Notes 6 Articles connexes 7 Liens externes 7.1 Bibliographie Description | Ce sont des oiseaux compacts de taille petite à moyenne (10 à 46 cm), au bec droit et long, en forme de poignard. Leurs pattes sont courtes, et ils portent un plumage aux couleurs vives. Répartition et habitat | Cosmopolites, ils fréquentent surtout
            Read more

            Can an atomic nucleus contain both particles and antiparticles? [duplicate]

            Image
            9 $begingroup$ This question already has an answer here: What happens if we put together a proton and an antineutron? 2 answers Is it theoretically possible to make a "deuterium" atom containing a proton and an antineutron in its nucleus? Would the strong nuclear force cause attraction between a proton and an antineutron? Would such a nucleus be stable, or would the proton somehow annihilate the antineutron when close enough? nuclear-physics antimatter share | cite | improve this question asked yesterday
            Read more