What are SpaceX Starship/BFR proposed abort modes?












5












$begingroup$


From the different renderings of Starship no escape systems can be seen.



What will the different abort modes both during launch and landing be like?



What happens for example if the first stage suffers a catastrophic failure at or soon after liftoff?



How about landing? What is planned in case of single or multiple engine failures?



Thanks!










share|improve this question







New contributor




GuruGuruSandwich is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$

















    5












    $begingroup$


    From the different renderings of Starship no escape systems can be seen.



    What will the different abort modes both during launch and landing be like?



    What happens for example if the first stage suffers a catastrophic failure at or soon after liftoff?



    How about landing? What is planned in case of single or multiple engine failures?



    Thanks!










    share|improve this question







    New contributor




    GuruGuruSandwich is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.







    $endgroup$















      5












      5








      5





      $begingroup$


      From the different renderings of Starship no escape systems can be seen.



      What will the different abort modes both during launch and landing be like?



      What happens for example if the first stage suffers a catastrophic failure at or soon after liftoff?



      How about landing? What is planned in case of single or multiple engine failures?



      Thanks!










      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      GuruGuruSandwich is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.







      $endgroup$




      From the different renderings of Starship no escape systems can be seen.



      What will the different abort modes both during launch and landing be like?



      What happens for example if the first stage suffers a catastrophic failure at or soon after liftoff?



      How about landing? What is planned in case of single or multiple engine failures?



      Thanks!







      spacex abort bfr






      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      GuruGuruSandwich is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      GuruGuruSandwich is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question






      New contributor




      GuruGuruSandwich is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 2 days ago









      GuruGuruSandwichGuruGuruSandwich

      283




      283




      New contributor




      GuruGuruSandwich is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      GuruGuruSandwich is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      GuruGuruSandwich is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          9












          $begingroup$

          There are no published/proposed abort modes for ascent. We can speculate that some incidents can be survived by letting Starship tumble free and light it's own engines to burn to a low orbit or land depending on altitude and velocity, but that capability has not been proposed by SpaceX.



          Landing redundancy is provided by carrying 7 deep throttling, sea level capable engines on the current edition - meaning a redundant number of engines can start the landing burn at low throttle levels, increasing throttle if engines drop out.



          But even that is speculative based on the current design. SpaceX has not discussed abort modes other than mentioning that airlines do not have escape capsules or parachutes, and stating that they are aiming for that level of reliability.



          From the first IAC presentation, a vague response from Elon about abort abilities and their impracticality with this platform:




          Oh launch abort, the spacecraft itself is capable of aborting from the
          booster, the erm… Launch abort on the spaceship itself is kinda
          pointless, if you’re on Mars you’re taking off or you’re not taking
          off. You know, parachutes don’t work too well and [you can’t have]
          some standard abort system, and just how do you abort 100 people it’s
          just not feasible, the key is to make the spaceship itself extremely
          safe and reliable, and have redundancy in the engines, high safety
          margins and have [it be] well tested. Much like a commercial airliner.
          Like they don’t give you parachutes.







          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$





















            5












            $begingroup$

            Really this is several questions. Launch abort, and landing abort/recovery questions.



            Launch abort, there is not yet a lot of good answers, and may have to wait for future information.



            Landing abort we know they intend to land on at least 3 engines, which they changed from 2 to 3 in the various iterations. This is designed to allow engine out on landing. Multiple engine loss on landing and it just going to be a bad day, no matter what.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "508"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });






              GuruGuruSandwich is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f33837%2fwhat-are-spacex-starship-bfr-proposed-abort-modes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              9












              $begingroup$

              There are no published/proposed abort modes for ascent. We can speculate that some incidents can be survived by letting Starship tumble free and light it's own engines to burn to a low orbit or land depending on altitude and velocity, but that capability has not been proposed by SpaceX.



              Landing redundancy is provided by carrying 7 deep throttling, sea level capable engines on the current edition - meaning a redundant number of engines can start the landing burn at low throttle levels, increasing throttle if engines drop out.



              But even that is speculative based on the current design. SpaceX has not discussed abort modes other than mentioning that airlines do not have escape capsules or parachutes, and stating that they are aiming for that level of reliability.



              From the first IAC presentation, a vague response from Elon about abort abilities and their impracticality with this platform:




              Oh launch abort, the spacecraft itself is capable of aborting from the
              booster, the erm… Launch abort on the spaceship itself is kinda
              pointless, if you’re on Mars you’re taking off or you’re not taking
              off. You know, parachutes don’t work too well and [you can’t have]
              some standard abort system, and just how do you abort 100 people it’s
              just not feasible, the key is to make the spaceship itself extremely
              safe and reliable, and have redundancy in the engines, high safety
              margins and have [it be] well tested. Much like a commercial airliner.
              Like they don’t give you parachutes.







              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$


















                9












                $begingroup$

                There are no published/proposed abort modes for ascent. We can speculate that some incidents can be survived by letting Starship tumble free and light it's own engines to burn to a low orbit or land depending on altitude and velocity, but that capability has not been proposed by SpaceX.



                Landing redundancy is provided by carrying 7 deep throttling, sea level capable engines on the current edition - meaning a redundant number of engines can start the landing burn at low throttle levels, increasing throttle if engines drop out.



                But even that is speculative based on the current design. SpaceX has not discussed abort modes other than mentioning that airlines do not have escape capsules or parachutes, and stating that they are aiming for that level of reliability.



                From the first IAC presentation, a vague response from Elon about abort abilities and their impracticality with this platform:




                Oh launch abort, the spacecraft itself is capable of aborting from the
                booster, the erm… Launch abort on the spaceship itself is kinda
                pointless, if you’re on Mars you’re taking off or you’re not taking
                off. You know, parachutes don’t work too well and [you can’t have]
                some standard abort system, and just how do you abort 100 people it’s
                just not feasible, the key is to make the spaceship itself extremely
                safe and reliable, and have redundancy in the engines, high safety
                margins and have [it be] well tested. Much like a commercial airliner.
                Like they don’t give you parachutes.







                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$
















                  9












                  9








                  9





                  $begingroup$

                  There are no published/proposed abort modes for ascent. We can speculate that some incidents can be survived by letting Starship tumble free and light it's own engines to burn to a low orbit or land depending on altitude and velocity, but that capability has not been proposed by SpaceX.



                  Landing redundancy is provided by carrying 7 deep throttling, sea level capable engines on the current edition - meaning a redundant number of engines can start the landing burn at low throttle levels, increasing throttle if engines drop out.



                  But even that is speculative based on the current design. SpaceX has not discussed abort modes other than mentioning that airlines do not have escape capsules or parachutes, and stating that they are aiming for that level of reliability.



                  From the first IAC presentation, a vague response from Elon about abort abilities and their impracticality with this platform:




                  Oh launch abort, the spacecraft itself is capable of aborting from the
                  booster, the erm… Launch abort on the spaceship itself is kinda
                  pointless, if you’re on Mars you’re taking off or you’re not taking
                  off. You know, parachutes don’t work too well and [you can’t have]
                  some standard abort system, and just how do you abort 100 people it’s
                  just not feasible, the key is to make the spaceship itself extremely
                  safe and reliable, and have redundancy in the engines, high safety
                  margins and have [it be] well tested. Much like a commercial airliner.
                  Like they don’t give you parachutes.







                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  There are no published/proposed abort modes for ascent. We can speculate that some incidents can be survived by letting Starship tumble free and light it's own engines to burn to a low orbit or land depending on altitude and velocity, but that capability has not been proposed by SpaceX.



                  Landing redundancy is provided by carrying 7 deep throttling, sea level capable engines on the current edition - meaning a redundant number of engines can start the landing burn at low throttle levels, increasing throttle if engines drop out.



                  But even that is speculative based on the current design. SpaceX has not discussed abort modes other than mentioning that airlines do not have escape capsules or parachutes, and stating that they are aiming for that level of reliability.



                  From the first IAC presentation, a vague response from Elon about abort abilities and their impracticality with this platform:




                  Oh launch abort, the spacecraft itself is capable of aborting from the
                  booster, the erm… Launch abort on the spaceship itself is kinda
                  pointless, if you’re on Mars you’re taking off or you’re not taking
                  off. You know, parachutes don’t work too well and [you can’t have]
                  some standard abort system, and just how do you abort 100 people it’s
                  just not feasible, the key is to make the spaceship itself extremely
                  safe and reliable, and have redundancy in the engines, high safety
                  margins and have [it be] well tested. Much like a commercial airliner.
                  Like they don’t give you parachutes.








                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 2 days ago

























                  answered 2 days ago









                  SaibooguSaiboogu

                  3,9821828




                  3,9821828























                      5












                      $begingroup$

                      Really this is several questions. Launch abort, and landing abort/recovery questions.



                      Launch abort, there is not yet a lot of good answers, and may have to wait for future information.



                      Landing abort we know they intend to land on at least 3 engines, which they changed from 2 to 3 in the various iterations. This is designed to allow engine out on landing. Multiple engine loss on landing and it just going to be a bad day, no matter what.






                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$


















                        5












                        $begingroup$

                        Really this is several questions. Launch abort, and landing abort/recovery questions.



                        Launch abort, there is not yet a lot of good answers, and may have to wait for future information.



                        Landing abort we know they intend to land on at least 3 engines, which they changed from 2 to 3 in the various iterations. This is designed to allow engine out on landing. Multiple engine loss on landing and it just going to be a bad day, no matter what.






                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$
















                          5












                          5








                          5





                          $begingroup$

                          Really this is several questions. Launch abort, and landing abort/recovery questions.



                          Launch abort, there is not yet a lot of good answers, and may have to wait for future information.



                          Landing abort we know they intend to land on at least 3 engines, which they changed from 2 to 3 in the various iterations. This is designed to allow engine out on landing. Multiple engine loss on landing and it just going to be a bad day, no matter what.






                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          Really this is several questions. Launch abort, and landing abort/recovery questions.



                          Launch abort, there is not yet a lot of good answers, and may have to wait for future information.



                          Landing abort we know they intend to land on at least 3 engines, which they changed from 2 to 3 in the various iterations. This is designed to allow engine out on landing. Multiple engine loss on landing and it just going to be a bad day, no matter what.







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered 2 days ago









                          geoffcgeoffc

                          55.1k9160306




                          55.1k9160306






















                              GuruGuruSandwich is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                              draft saved

                              draft discarded


















                              GuruGuruSandwich is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                              GuruGuruSandwich is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                              GuruGuruSandwich is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Space Exploration Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f33837%2fwhat-are-spacex-starship-bfr-proposed-abort-modes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              "Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

                              Alcedinidae

                              RAC Tourist Trophy