Multiple External Internet Providers - Edge Router?
I have the desire for the following type of configuration below. I want to combine internet providers, but want to make sure all traffic non natted gets through to the Comcast connection, I am assuming that I can do all this fine with the router, looking for advise here if you have any.
But with the (Ubiquity) Edge Router, is it possible to assign out to other routers, and edge servers one of the dedicated IP's? Is there any advise here?
networking router
asked Jan 13 at 20:26
Bill DaughertyBill Daugherty
1055
add a comment |
I have the desire for the following type of configuration below. I want to combine internet providers, but want to make sure all traffic non natted gets through to the Comcast connection, I am assuming that I can do all this fine with the router, looking for advise here if you have any.
But with the (Ubiquity) Edge Router, is it possible to assign out to other routers, and edge servers one of the dedicated IP's? Is there any advise here?
networking router
asked Jan 13 at 20:26
Bill DaughertyBill Daugherty
1055
I’m assuming both ATT and Comcast modems are in bridge mode. I think some complication here is that you are trying to “pass through” a public IP to a private device. That’s not really how a router works. Typically you really only need one router with 3 interfaces. 1 interface each for ATT and Comcast with the public IPs assigned to those interfaces. Then a third interface connecting to one internal network. With a series of NAT and routing rules you can direct all traffic on one particular public IP to one particular server. But all internal devices still have private IPs. No “pass through.”
– Appleoddity
Jan 14 at 3:33
It’s called one-to-one NAT. An internal server has IP 10.0.0.2 and is connected through one-to-one NAT to public IP 1.1.1.2. All outbound traffic from 10.0.0.2 is NATd to 1.1.1.2 and all inbound traffic destined to 1.1.1.2 is NATd to 10.0.0.2. The internal server never sees the IP 1.1.1.2.
– Appleoddity
Jan 14 at 3:35
add a comment |
I have the desire for the following type of configuration below. I want to combine internet providers, but want to make sure all traffic non natted gets through to the Comcast connection, I am assuming that I can do all this fine with the router, looking for advise here if you have any.
But with the (Ubiquity) Edge Router, is it possible to assign out to other routers, and edge servers one of the dedicated IP's? Is there any advise here?
networking router
asked Jan 13 at 20:26
Bill DaughertyBill Daugherty
1055
I have the desire for the following type of configuration below. I want to combine internet providers, but want to make sure all traffic non natted gets through to the Comcast connection, I am assuming that I can do all this fine with the router, looking for advise here if you have any.
But with the (Ubiquity) Edge Router, is it possible to assign out to other routers, and edge servers one of the dedicated IP's? Is there any advise here?
networking router
networking router
asked Jan 13 at 20:26
Bill DaughertyBill Daugherty
1055
asked Jan 13 at 20:26
Bill DaughertyBill Daugherty
1055
asked Jan 13 at 20:26
Bill DaughertyBill Daugherty
1055
asked Jan 13 at 20:26
Bill DaughertyBill Daugherty
1055
asked Jan 13 at 20:26
Bill DaughertyBill Daugherty
1055
1055
I’m assuming both ATT and Comcast modems are in bridge mode. I think some complication here is that you are trying to “pass through” a public IP to a private device. That’s not really how a router works. Typically you really only need one router with 3 interfaces. 1 interface each for ATT and Comcast with the public IPs assigned to those interfaces. Then a third interface connecting to one internal network. With a series of NAT and routing rules you can direct all traffic on one particular public IP to one particular server. But all internal devices still have private IPs. No “pass through.”
– Appleoddity
Jan 14 at 3:33
It’s called one-to-one NAT. An internal server has IP 10.0.0.2 and is connected through one-to-one NAT to public IP 1.1.1.2. All outbound traffic from 10.0.0.2 is NATd to 1.1.1.2 and all inbound traffic destined to 1.1.1.2 is NATd to 10.0.0.2. The internal server never sees the IP 1.1.1.2.
– Appleoddity
Jan 14 at 3:35
add a comment |
I’m assuming both ATT and Comcast modems are in bridge mode. I think some complication here is that you are trying to “pass through” a public IP to a private device. That’s not really how a router works. Typically you really only need one router with 3 interfaces. 1 interface each for ATT and Comcast with the public IPs assigned to those interfaces. Then a third interface connecting to one internal network. With a series of NAT and routing rules you can direct all traffic on one particular public IP to one particular server. But all internal devices still have private IPs. No “pass through.”
– Appleoddity
Jan 14 at 3:33
It’s called one-to-one NAT. An internal server has IP 10.0.0.2 and is connected through one-to-one NAT to public IP 1.1.1.2. All outbound traffic from 10.0.0.2 is NATd to 1.1.1.2 and all inbound traffic destined to 1.1.1.2 is NATd to 10.0.0.2. The internal server never sees the IP 1.1.1.2.
– Appleoddity
Jan 14 at 3:35
I’m assuming both ATT and Comcast modems are in bridge mode. I think some complication here is that you are trying to “pass through” a public IP to a private device. That’s not really how a router works. Typically you really only need one router with 3 interfaces. 1 interface each for ATT and Comcast with the public IPs assigned to those interfaces. Then a third interface connecting to one internal network. With a series of NAT and routing rules you can direct all traffic on one particular public IP to one particular server. But all internal devices still have private IPs. No “pass through.”
– Appleoddity
Jan 14 at 3:33
I’m assuming both ATT and Comcast modems are in bridge mode. I think some complication here is that you are trying to “pass through” a public IP to a private device. That’s not really how a router works. Typically you really only need one router with 3 interfaces. 1 interface each for ATT and Comcast with the public IPs assigned to those interfaces. Then a third interface connecting to one internal network. With a series of NAT and routing rules you can direct all traffic on one particular public IP to one particular server. But all internal devices still have private IPs. No “pass through.”
– Appleoddity
Jan 14 at 3:33
It’s called one-to-one NAT. An internal server has IP 10.0.0.2 and is connected through one-to-one NAT to public IP 1.1.1.2. All outbound traffic from 10.0.0.2 is NATd to 1.1.1.2 and all inbound traffic destined to 1.1.1.2 is NATd to 10.0.0.2. The internal server never sees the IP 1.1.1.2.
– Appleoddity
Jan 14 at 3:35
It’s called one-to-one NAT. An internal server has IP 10.0.0.2 and is connected through one-to-one NAT to public IP 1.1.1.2. All outbound traffic from 10.0.0.2 is NATd to 1.1.1.2 and all inbound traffic destined to 1.1.1.2 is NATd to 10.0.0.2. The internal server never sees the IP 1.1.1.2.
– Appleoddity
Jan 14 at 3:35
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1393885%2fmultiple-external-internet-providers-edge-router%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1393885%2fmultiple-external-internet-providers-edge-router%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
I’m assuming both ATT and Comcast modems are in bridge mode. I think some complication here is that you are trying to “pass through” a public IP to a private device. That’s not really how a router works. Typically you really only need one router with 3 interfaces. 1 interface each for ATT and Comcast with the public IPs assigned to those interfaces. Then a third interface connecting to one internal network. With a series of NAT and routing rules you can direct all traffic on one particular public IP to one particular server. But all internal devices still have private IPs. No “pass through.”
– Appleoddity
Jan 14 at 3:33
It’s called one-to-one NAT. An internal server has IP 10.0.0.2 and is connected through one-to-one NAT to public IP 1.1.1.2. All outbound traffic from 10.0.0.2 is NATd to 1.1.1.2 and all inbound traffic destined to 1.1.1.2 is NATd to 10.0.0.2. The internal server never sees the IP 1.1.1.2.
– Appleoddity
Jan 14 at 3:35