My boss gave me an end date for my job- but he wants a very complex project done before then
I've been working as a software engineer contractor for the last year and a half, at a company that has been promising to onboard me as a full employee for over seven months. However, I was recently told that our whole team is being eliminated, and most of the team members will end up getting moved to different teams.
I was then later told by my boss that I will be one of the first employees to be "rolled off," at the end of March, and they do not have any position lined up for me afterwards. Furthermore, he expects a very complex project to be done before that time - including documentation, testing, etc.. I am the only person who knows all the details of this project, and I have been pushing to work on it for over a year, but this has mostly been ignored until now.
The timeline he has given is very unreasonable for this project, especially considering I have a lot of PTO to use before my contract is over. Because of this, I am planning on giving them an ultimatum: they can either guarantee me work until the official end-date of my contract (in July), or I will leave immediately without doing any work on this project. My contract gives both parties the right to sever it at any time, so I am within my rights.
Would you consider this course of action reasonable? If so, would there be any downsides, besides the possibility of being unemployed for a few months?
software-industry manager termination contracting
|
show 6 more comments
I've been working as a software engineer contractor for the last year and a half, at a company that has been promising to onboard me as a full employee for over seven months. However, I was recently told that our whole team is being eliminated, and most of the team members will end up getting moved to different teams.
I was then later told by my boss that I will be one of the first employees to be "rolled off," at the end of March, and they do not have any position lined up for me afterwards. Furthermore, he expects a very complex project to be done before that time - including documentation, testing, etc.. I am the only person who knows all the details of this project, and I have been pushing to work on it for over a year, but this has mostly been ignored until now.
The timeline he has given is very unreasonable for this project, especially considering I have a lot of PTO to use before my contract is over. Because of this, I am planning on giving them an ultimatum: they can either guarantee me work until the official end-date of my contract (in July), or I will leave immediately without doing any work on this project. My contract gives both parties the right to sever it at any time, so I am within my rights.
Would you consider this course of action reasonable? If so, would there be any downsides, besides the possibility of being unemployed for a few months?
software-industry manager termination contracting
17
They can always pay you in lieu of that PTO you have yet to spend, just saying...
– DarkCygnus
11 hours ago
9
" would there be any downsides, besides the possibility of being unemployed for a few months?" - a poor reference in the future. You may not care.
– Joe Strazzere
11 hours ago
4
Have you expressed any of your concerns to your boss, specifically as it relates to the PTO your owed? Curious though, most contractors don't get paid time off....
– Mister Positive
11 hours ago
10
>"they can guarantee me work until the official end-date ..." They will simply: lie to your face. As they have been lying to your face for seven months.
– Fattie
11 hours ago
21
Complex or not, you are paid contractually. Trying to finish the complex project is the goal for your boss, but the goal for you, as a contractor worker, is to show up and do your best work. Simply put, if finishing is not reasonable, you should tell him you probably won't finish in the time allotted, and explain why or show your estimate.
– Mike
11 hours ago
|
show 6 more comments
I've been working as a software engineer contractor for the last year and a half, at a company that has been promising to onboard me as a full employee for over seven months. However, I was recently told that our whole team is being eliminated, and most of the team members will end up getting moved to different teams.
I was then later told by my boss that I will be one of the first employees to be "rolled off," at the end of March, and they do not have any position lined up for me afterwards. Furthermore, he expects a very complex project to be done before that time - including documentation, testing, etc.. I am the only person who knows all the details of this project, and I have been pushing to work on it for over a year, but this has mostly been ignored until now.
The timeline he has given is very unreasonable for this project, especially considering I have a lot of PTO to use before my contract is over. Because of this, I am planning on giving them an ultimatum: they can either guarantee me work until the official end-date of my contract (in July), or I will leave immediately without doing any work on this project. My contract gives both parties the right to sever it at any time, so I am within my rights.
Would you consider this course of action reasonable? If so, would there be any downsides, besides the possibility of being unemployed for a few months?
software-industry manager termination contracting
I've been working as a software engineer contractor for the last year and a half, at a company that has been promising to onboard me as a full employee for over seven months. However, I was recently told that our whole team is being eliminated, and most of the team members will end up getting moved to different teams.
I was then later told by my boss that I will be one of the first employees to be "rolled off," at the end of March, and they do not have any position lined up for me afterwards. Furthermore, he expects a very complex project to be done before that time - including documentation, testing, etc.. I am the only person who knows all the details of this project, and I have been pushing to work on it for over a year, but this has mostly been ignored until now.
The timeline he has given is very unreasonable for this project, especially considering I have a lot of PTO to use before my contract is over. Because of this, I am planning on giving them an ultimatum: they can either guarantee me work until the official end-date of my contract (in July), or I will leave immediately without doing any work on this project. My contract gives both parties the right to sever it at any time, so I am within my rights.
Would you consider this course of action reasonable? If so, would there be any downsides, besides the possibility of being unemployed for a few months?
software-industry manager termination contracting
software-industry manager termination contracting
edited 11 hours ago
DarkCygnus
36.4k1773155
36.4k1773155
asked 11 hours ago
Austin GamezAustin Gamez
16524
16524
17
They can always pay you in lieu of that PTO you have yet to spend, just saying...
– DarkCygnus
11 hours ago
9
" would there be any downsides, besides the possibility of being unemployed for a few months?" - a poor reference in the future. You may not care.
– Joe Strazzere
11 hours ago
4
Have you expressed any of your concerns to your boss, specifically as it relates to the PTO your owed? Curious though, most contractors don't get paid time off....
– Mister Positive
11 hours ago
10
>"they can guarantee me work until the official end-date ..." They will simply: lie to your face. As they have been lying to your face for seven months.
– Fattie
11 hours ago
21
Complex or not, you are paid contractually. Trying to finish the complex project is the goal for your boss, but the goal for you, as a contractor worker, is to show up and do your best work. Simply put, if finishing is not reasonable, you should tell him you probably won't finish in the time allotted, and explain why or show your estimate.
– Mike
11 hours ago
|
show 6 more comments
17
They can always pay you in lieu of that PTO you have yet to spend, just saying...
– DarkCygnus
11 hours ago
9
" would there be any downsides, besides the possibility of being unemployed for a few months?" - a poor reference in the future. You may not care.
– Joe Strazzere
11 hours ago
4
Have you expressed any of your concerns to your boss, specifically as it relates to the PTO your owed? Curious though, most contractors don't get paid time off....
– Mister Positive
11 hours ago
10
>"they can guarantee me work until the official end-date ..." They will simply: lie to your face. As they have been lying to your face for seven months.
– Fattie
11 hours ago
21
Complex or not, you are paid contractually. Trying to finish the complex project is the goal for your boss, but the goal for you, as a contractor worker, is to show up and do your best work. Simply put, if finishing is not reasonable, you should tell him you probably won't finish in the time allotted, and explain why or show your estimate.
– Mike
11 hours ago
17
17
They can always pay you in lieu of that PTO you have yet to spend, just saying...
– DarkCygnus
11 hours ago
They can always pay you in lieu of that PTO you have yet to spend, just saying...
– DarkCygnus
11 hours ago
9
9
" would there be any downsides, besides the possibility of being unemployed for a few months?" - a poor reference in the future. You may not care.
– Joe Strazzere
11 hours ago
" would there be any downsides, besides the possibility of being unemployed for a few months?" - a poor reference in the future. You may not care.
– Joe Strazzere
11 hours ago
4
4
Have you expressed any of your concerns to your boss, specifically as it relates to the PTO your owed? Curious though, most contractors don't get paid time off....
– Mister Positive
11 hours ago
Have you expressed any of your concerns to your boss, specifically as it relates to the PTO your owed? Curious though, most contractors don't get paid time off....
– Mister Positive
11 hours ago
10
10
>"they can guarantee me work until the official end-date ..." They will simply: lie to your face. As they have been lying to your face for seven months.
– Fattie
11 hours ago
>"they can guarantee me work until the official end-date ..." They will simply: lie to your face. As they have been lying to your face for seven months.
– Fattie
11 hours ago
21
21
Complex or not, you are paid contractually. Trying to finish the complex project is the goal for your boss, but the goal for you, as a contractor worker, is to show up and do your best work. Simply put, if finishing is not reasonable, you should tell him you probably won't finish in the time allotted, and explain why or show your estimate.
– Mike
11 hours ago
Complex or not, you are paid contractually. Trying to finish the complex project is the goal for your boss, but the goal for you, as a contractor worker, is to show up and do your best work. Simply put, if finishing is not reasonable, you should tell him you probably won't finish in the time allotted, and explain why or show your estimate.
– Mike
11 hours ago
|
show 6 more comments
8 Answers
8
active
oldest
votes
There are a number of reasonable responses you could make. That one is rather extreme. In particular, the way you've presented it it sounds rather like blackmail - something you might not want to present the appearance of.
The better way to handle it, I think, would be a bit of an adjustment. Straight up tell the man that there is too much work to get it done in the time allotted, especially given your PTO. Explain why. Tell him when you'd leave work to burn off your PTO and how much you expect that you could get done by then. Tell him how much time you'd need to get it done right, and what that would have to mean for your departure date. If he insists that you get it all done anyway without giving you the time to do it, tell him that you refuse to put in lousy work and offer to leave immediately.
You still get the meat of your argument across, but it's "If you're utterly unreasonable, I'll leave" rather than "If you don't promise to keep me on for extra time, I'll leave." The second is rather more dubious than the first.
2
Also OP can likely just be paid their leave at the end in a sum, rather than needing to use it.
– Tas
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Act out of professionalism, not out of spite.
That said, you can act professionally without making it easy for them.
You need to get your resume out, NOW
Start scheduling interviews ASAP, take time off if you need to, with or without compensation for those interviews
DO THE MINIMUM REQUIRED
It's not personal for them, it shouldn't be for you. They are not owed anything more than your basic output.
THEIR DEADLINES ARE NO LONGER YOUR CONCERN
You won't be there for the end of project, since they cut you off before it could be reasonably completed, don't kill yourself to get it done on time. Being professional does not mean going the extra mile for someone who is showing you no loyalty in return.
YOU ARE NOT LEAVING THEM IN A LURCH, THEY ARE LEAVING THEMSELVES IN ONE
It's not your fault that they cut you off without giving you time to complete the project. Go to work, put in an honest day's effort, but arrive exactly on the hour, leave exactly on the hour, take your allotted breaks, and don't concern yourself.
DO NOT NEGOTIATE, DO NOT TRUST
They have shown a complete disregard for you, even if you did manage to get them to agree to keep you until July, they'd likely have security escort you to the door 30 seconds after they verified the project complete.
You're angry now, but there is nothing to be gained by trying to negotiate with people who have already proven that they will act in bad faith. Stay above it all, but don't negotiate. They are not trustworthy.
LEAVE ON A HIGH NOTE
Do your work, do it well, don't stay late or come in early, but put in a full day and be above reproach. If they yell and scream, and try to pressure you, simply tell them that you are sorry, but because you are leaving four months earlier than expected, you simply don't have the time to dedicate to their project, as you have to plan for a period of unemployment and job hunting.
Then, do your work.
On your last day, send out a broadcast email saying what a pleasure it has been to work there, and move on.
They are not worth your time. Give your next employer your efforts, they have acted on bad faith and don't deserve anything more than a view of the back of your head as you walk away.
3
I disagree with the "minimum required". Minimum required would include sloppy and/or slow work.
– David Thornley
9 hours ago
12
@DavidThornley You'd have a point if I hadn't included "Do your work, do it well, don't stay late or come in early"
– Richard U
9 hours ago
21
I think doing your work well but no overtime is the minimum required. Doing slow, sloppy work is less than required!
– Meg
8 hours ago
4
@Meg exactly. Doing substandard work is not doing the minimum, it is doing less than minimum. I wouldn't want to employ anyone who thought that shoddy word meets a minimum standard.
– Richard U
8 hours ago
Re not coming early or staying late, the OP is a contractor and so probably gets paid by the hour. If so, there's no reason not to put in extra hours if management allows. It's more money in the bank while you're between jobs.
– jamesqf
7 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
Consider, the time to complete the project and your end date are not related in any way.
My first position would be to develop a reasonable timeline for the project then present that to management, irrespective of your end date.
At that point, they can either
- pay out your PTO and end the contract early
- offer you an extension until the project is complete
- have you insert some project time to hand it over to a remaining employee to complete.
Since you are already prepared to leave early, it's seems there is little risk to giving them a choice.
6
"Consider, the time to complete the project and your end date are not related in any way." The manager in question seems to be unaware of that reality.
– jpmc26
9 hours ago
3
@jpmc26 Right, so make them aware.
– Konrad Rudolph
7 hours ago
@jpmc26: Isn't being unaware of that sort of reality part of a manager's job description?
– jamesqf
7 hours ago
add a comment |
You should explain to your boss exactly why the timeline for this project is unreasonable. If they still decide that your end date remains unchanged then you simply do your assigned work to the best of your ability until either that date has arrived or you have found a new job. You should be looking for a new job no matter what while you still have one as you know that you will likely no longer be working with this company in the future.
Also, one thing to consider about end dates is that they can be extended. I have worked at a company that was bought out and all employees were given end dates but some were extended due to the circumstances regarding unfinished work that was still necessary. If this project is as important as you have implied, it is possible to have your end date extended however I wouldn't count on that. Brush up your resume and start applying to new companies.
add a comment |
Because of this, I am planning on giving them an ultimatum: they can either guarantee me work until the official end-date of my contract (in July), or I will leave immediately without doing any work on this project.
Assuming you are not bluffing, this gives you two possible outcomes:
a.) You are without a job now.
b.) You are without a job in July.
Would you consider this course of action reasonable? If so, would there be any downsides, besides the possibility of being unemployed for a few months?
I don't see any other downsides, but I don't think it is the best alternative out there.
Either way you will have to look for a new job, so you should as soon as possible.
My contract gives both parties the right to sever it at any time, so I am within my rights.
This gives you the option to quit the moment you got your new job. This seems more flexible to me than to look for a job that starts exactly when your contract is finished.
You don't owe your employer finishing the project.
New contributor
add a comment |
Would you consider this course of action reasonable? If so, would there be any downsides, besides the possibility of being unemployed for a few months?
It's not unreasonable, although I would be more focused on job-hunting than giving ultimatums.
The downside of being unemployed is that it makes the process of job-hunting more difficult for several reasons (some exposed here and here), not to mention the lack of income and having to depend on savings, etc., so I say that your priority should be in finding a new job.
I suggest you simultaneously do the following:
Job-hunt ASAP. Start looking for new jobs, interviews, etc right now, while you are still employed.
Start working on the docs and tests, but also expose to your boss the reasons why such due date is not achievable, and present a date that you consider could be achieved. This will give you at least until March to line up a new job and avoid the unemployment gap.
However, if your boss continues to be unreasonable, and you feel OK and confident in giving the ultimatum (and its possible outcomes), then the way to go is to proceed to give it.
Just, whatever you do, start job-hunting ASAP.
add a comment |
Complex or not, you are paid contractually. Trying to finish the complex project is the goal for your boss, but the goal for you, as a contractor worker, is to show up and do your best work.
Simply put, if finishing is not reasonable, you should tell him you probably won't finish in the time allotted, but you will do your best.
Tell them in writing/email. Make sure there is a record and bcc your own private email account to make sure you have a record. Just in case, as they say.
– StephenG
1 hour ago
add a comment |
A professional way to look at this in the way of project management.
The basic variables are:
- Number of people
- Length of elapsed time.
- Quality
- Scope
As everyone ever responsible for managing a software project has learnt, you have to explain to stakeholders that you cannot fix all of these externally and expect it to add up.
If the company wants to fix the project scope, then they need to vary something else.
Alternatively, you can make the scope a variable. Break the project up into the usual 2-3 day tasks and require the business to prioritise on a regular basis. You simply work through them in order and get as far as you can.
A side effect of this approach in your context is that if by the end of March you are half done, they are in a position to extend. This amount of time is just about enough that if you assign story points to tasks you should have a velocity measure to estimate the overall amount of time required.
Obviously, other answers already articulate some of the ways to communicate this.
Bottom line: Try to take the high ground, and at the same time have a contingency plan for yourself.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "423"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: false,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f128876%2fmy-boss-gave-me-an-end-date-for-my-job-but-he-wants-a-very-complex-project-done%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(function () {
$("#show-editor-button input, #show-editor-button button").click(function () {
var showEditor = function() {
$("#show-editor-button").hide();
$("#post-form").removeClass("dno");
StackExchange.editor.finallyInit();
};
var useFancy = $(this).data('confirm-use-fancy');
if(useFancy == 'True') {
var popupTitle = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-title');
var popupBody = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-body');
var popupAccept = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-accept-button');
$(this).loadPopup({
url: '/post/self-answer-popup',
loaded: function(popup) {
var pTitle = $(popup).find('h2');
var pBody = $(popup).find('.popup-body');
var pSubmit = $(popup).find('.popup-submit');
pTitle.text(popupTitle);
pBody.html(popupBody);
pSubmit.val(popupAccept).click(showEditor);
}
})
} else{
var confirmText = $(this).data('confirm-text');
if (confirmText ? confirm(confirmText) : true) {
showEditor();
}
}
});
});
8 Answers
8
active
oldest
votes
8 Answers
8
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
There are a number of reasonable responses you could make. That one is rather extreme. In particular, the way you've presented it it sounds rather like blackmail - something you might not want to present the appearance of.
The better way to handle it, I think, would be a bit of an adjustment. Straight up tell the man that there is too much work to get it done in the time allotted, especially given your PTO. Explain why. Tell him when you'd leave work to burn off your PTO and how much you expect that you could get done by then. Tell him how much time you'd need to get it done right, and what that would have to mean for your departure date. If he insists that you get it all done anyway without giving you the time to do it, tell him that you refuse to put in lousy work and offer to leave immediately.
You still get the meat of your argument across, but it's "If you're utterly unreasonable, I'll leave" rather than "If you don't promise to keep me on for extra time, I'll leave." The second is rather more dubious than the first.
2
Also OP can likely just be paid their leave at the end in a sum, rather than needing to use it.
– Tas
5 hours ago
add a comment |
There are a number of reasonable responses you could make. That one is rather extreme. In particular, the way you've presented it it sounds rather like blackmail - something you might not want to present the appearance of.
The better way to handle it, I think, would be a bit of an adjustment. Straight up tell the man that there is too much work to get it done in the time allotted, especially given your PTO. Explain why. Tell him when you'd leave work to burn off your PTO and how much you expect that you could get done by then. Tell him how much time you'd need to get it done right, and what that would have to mean for your departure date. If he insists that you get it all done anyway without giving you the time to do it, tell him that you refuse to put in lousy work and offer to leave immediately.
You still get the meat of your argument across, but it's "If you're utterly unreasonable, I'll leave" rather than "If you don't promise to keep me on for extra time, I'll leave." The second is rather more dubious than the first.
2
Also OP can likely just be paid their leave at the end in a sum, rather than needing to use it.
– Tas
5 hours ago
add a comment |
There are a number of reasonable responses you could make. That one is rather extreme. In particular, the way you've presented it it sounds rather like blackmail - something you might not want to present the appearance of.
The better way to handle it, I think, would be a bit of an adjustment. Straight up tell the man that there is too much work to get it done in the time allotted, especially given your PTO. Explain why. Tell him when you'd leave work to burn off your PTO and how much you expect that you could get done by then. Tell him how much time you'd need to get it done right, and what that would have to mean for your departure date. If he insists that you get it all done anyway without giving you the time to do it, tell him that you refuse to put in lousy work and offer to leave immediately.
You still get the meat of your argument across, but it's "If you're utterly unreasonable, I'll leave" rather than "If you don't promise to keep me on for extra time, I'll leave." The second is rather more dubious than the first.
There are a number of reasonable responses you could make. That one is rather extreme. In particular, the way you've presented it it sounds rather like blackmail - something you might not want to present the appearance of.
The better way to handle it, I think, would be a bit of an adjustment. Straight up tell the man that there is too much work to get it done in the time allotted, especially given your PTO. Explain why. Tell him when you'd leave work to burn off your PTO and how much you expect that you could get done by then. Tell him how much time you'd need to get it done right, and what that would have to mean for your departure date. If he insists that you get it all done anyway without giving you the time to do it, tell him that you refuse to put in lousy work and offer to leave immediately.
You still get the meat of your argument across, but it's "If you're utterly unreasonable, I'll leave" rather than "If you don't promise to keep me on for extra time, I'll leave." The second is rather more dubious than the first.
answered 11 hours ago
Ben BardenBen Barden
5,68821218
5,68821218
2
Also OP can likely just be paid their leave at the end in a sum, rather than needing to use it.
– Tas
5 hours ago
add a comment |
2
Also OP can likely just be paid their leave at the end in a sum, rather than needing to use it.
– Tas
5 hours ago
2
2
Also OP can likely just be paid their leave at the end in a sum, rather than needing to use it.
– Tas
5 hours ago
Also OP can likely just be paid their leave at the end in a sum, rather than needing to use it.
– Tas
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Act out of professionalism, not out of spite.
That said, you can act professionally without making it easy for them.
You need to get your resume out, NOW
Start scheduling interviews ASAP, take time off if you need to, with or without compensation for those interviews
DO THE MINIMUM REQUIRED
It's not personal for them, it shouldn't be for you. They are not owed anything more than your basic output.
THEIR DEADLINES ARE NO LONGER YOUR CONCERN
You won't be there for the end of project, since they cut you off before it could be reasonably completed, don't kill yourself to get it done on time. Being professional does not mean going the extra mile for someone who is showing you no loyalty in return.
YOU ARE NOT LEAVING THEM IN A LURCH, THEY ARE LEAVING THEMSELVES IN ONE
It's not your fault that they cut you off without giving you time to complete the project. Go to work, put in an honest day's effort, but arrive exactly on the hour, leave exactly on the hour, take your allotted breaks, and don't concern yourself.
DO NOT NEGOTIATE, DO NOT TRUST
They have shown a complete disregard for you, even if you did manage to get them to agree to keep you until July, they'd likely have security escort you to the door 30 seconds after they verified the project complete.
You're angry now, but there is nothing to be gained by trying to negotiate with people who have already proven that they will act in bad faith. Stay above it all, but don't negotiate. They are not trustworthy.
LEAVE ON A HIGH NOTE
Do your work, do it well, don't stay late or come in early, but put in a full day and be above reproach. If they yell and scream, and try to pressure you, simply tell them that you are sorry, but because you are leaving four months earlier than expected, you simply don't have the time to dedicate to their project, as you have to plan for a period of unemployment and job hunting.
Then, do your work.
On your last day, send out a broadcast email saying what a pleasure it has been to work there, and move on.
They are not worth your time. Give your next employer your efforts, they have acted on bad faith and don't deserve anything more than a view of the back of your head as you walk away.
3
I disagree with the "minimum required". Minimum required would include sloppy and/or slow work.
– David Thornley
9 hours ago
12
@DavidThornley You'd have a point if I hadn't included "Do your work, do it well, don't stay late or come in early"
– Richard U
9 hours ago
21
I think doing your work well but no overtime is the minimum required. Doing slow, sloppy work is less than required!
– Meg
8 hours ago
4
@Meg exactly. Doing substandard work is not doing the minimum, it is doing less than minimum. I wouldn't want to employ anyone who thought that shoddy word meets a minimum standard.
– Richard U
8 hours ago
Re not coming early or staying late, the OP is a contractor and so probably gets paid by the hour. If so, there's no reason not to put in extra hours if management allows. It's more money in the bank while you're between jobs.
– jamesqf
7 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
Act out of professionalism, not out of spite.
That said, you can act professionally without making it easy for them.
You need to get your resume out, NOW
Start scheduling interviews ASAP, take time off if you need to, with or without compensation for those interviews
DO THE MINIMUM REQUIRED
It's not personal for them, it shouldn't be for you. They are not owed anything more than your basic output.
THEIR DEADLINES ARE NO LONGER YOUR CONCERN
You won't be there for the end of project, since they cut you off before it could be reasonably completed, don't kill yourself to get it done on time. Being professional does not mean going the extra mile for someone who is showing you no loyalty in return.
YOU ARE NOT LEAVING THEM IN A LURCH, THEY ARE LEAVING THEMSELVES IN ONE
It's not your fault that they cut you off without giving you time to complete the project. Go to work, put in an honest day's effort, but arrive exactly on the hour, leave exactly on the hour, take your allotted breaks, and don't concern yourself.
DO NOT NEGOTIATE, DO NOT TRUST
They have shown a complete disregard for you, even if you did manage to get them to agree to keep you until July, they'd likely have security escort you to the door 30 seconds after they verified the project complete.
You're angry now, but there is nothing to be gained by trying to negotiate with people who have already proven that they will act in bad faith. Stay above it all, but don't negotiate. They are not trustworthy.
LEAVE ON A HIGH NOTE
Do your work, do it well, don't stay late or come in early, but put in a full day and be above reproach. If they yell and scream, and try to pressure you, simply tell them that you are sorry, but because you are leaving four months earlier than expected, you simply don't have the time to dedicate to their project, as you have to plan for a period of unemployment and job hunting.
Then, do your work.
On your last day, send out a broadcast email saying what a pleasure it has been to work there, and move on.
They are not worth your time. Give your next employer your efforts, they have acted on bad faith and don't deserve anything more than a view of the back of your head as you walk away.
3
I disagree with the "minimum required". Minimum required would include sloppy and/or slow work.
– David Thornley
9 hours ago
12
@DavidThornley You'd have a point if I hadn't included "Do your work, do it well, don't stay late or come in early"
– Richard U
9 hours ago
21
I think doing your work well but no overtime is the minimum required. Doing slow, sloppy work is less than required!
– Meg
8 hours ago
4
@Meg exactly. Doing substandard work is not doing the minimum, it is doing less than minimum. I wouldn't want to employ anyone who thought that shoddy word meets a minimum standard.
– Richard U
8 hours ago
Re not coming early or staying late, the OP is a contractor and so probably gets paid by the hour. If so, there's no reason not to put in extra hours if management allows. It's more money in the bank while you're between jobs.
– jamesqf
7 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
Act out of professionalism, not out of spite.
That said, you can act professionally without making it easy for them.
You need to get your resume out, NOW
Start scheduling interviews ASAP, take time off if you need to, with or without compensation for those interviews
DO THE MINIMUM REQUIRED
It's not personal for them, it shouldn't be for you. They are not owed anything more than your basic output.
THEIR DEADLINES ARE NO LONGER YOUR CONCERN
You won't be there for the end of project, since they cut you off before it could be reasonably completed, don't kill yourself to get it done on time. Being professional does not mean going the extra mile for someone who is showing you no loyalty in return.
YOU ARE NOT LEAVING THEM IN A LURCH, THEY ARE LEAVING THEMSELVES IN ONE
It's not your fault that they cut you off without giving you time to complete the project. Go to work, put in an honest day's effort, but arrive exactly on the hour, leave exactly on the hour, take your allotted breaks, and don't concern yourself.
DO NOT NEGOTIATE, DO NOT TRUST
They have shown a complete disregard for you, even if you did manage to get them to agree to keep you until July, they'd likely have security escort you to the door 30 seconds after they verified the project complete.
You're angry now, but there is nothing to be gained by trying to negotiate with people who have already proven that they will act in bad faith. Stay above it all, but don't negotiate. They are not trustworthy.
LEAVE ON A HIGH NOTE
Do your work, do it well, don't stay late or come in early, but put in a full day and be above reproach. If they yell and scream, and try to pressure you, simply tell them that you are sorry, but because you are leaving four months earlier than expected, you simply don't have the time to dedicate to their project, as you have to plan for a period of unemployment and job hunting.
Then, do your work.
On your last day, send out a broadcast email saying what a pleasure it has been to work there, and move on.
They are not worth your time. Give your next employer your efforts, they have acted on bad faith and don't deserve anything more than a view of the back of your head as you walk away.
Act out of professionalism, not out of spite.
That said, you can act professionally without making it easy for them.
You need to get your resume out, NOW
Start scheduling interviews ASAP, take time off if you need to, with or without compensation for those interviews
DO THE MINIMUM REQUIRED
It's not personal for them, it shouldn't be for you. They are not owed anything more than your basic output.
THEIR DEADLINES ARE NO LONGER YOUR CONCERN
You won't be there for the end of project, since they cut you off before it could be reasonably completed, don't kill yourself to get it done on time. Being professional does not mean going the extra mile for someone who is showing you no loyalty in return.
YOU ARE NOT LEAVING THEM IN A LURCH, THEY ARE LEAVING THEMSELVES IN ONE
It's not your fault that they cut you off without giving you time to complete the project. Go to work, put in an honest day's effort, but arrive exactly on the hour, leave exactly on the hour, take your allotted breaks, and don't concern yourself.
DO NOT NEGOTIATE, DO NOT TRUST
They have shown a complete disregard for you, even if you did manage to get them to agree to keep you until July, they'd likely have security escort you to the door 30 seconds after they verified the project complete.
You're angry now, but there is nothing to be gained by trying to negotiate with people who have already proven that they will act in bad faith. Stay above it all, but don't negotiate. They are not trustworthy.
LEAVE ON A HIGH NOTE
Do your work, do it well, don't stay late or come in early, but put in a full day and be above reproach. If they yell and scream, and try to pressure you, simply tell them that you are sorry, but because you are leaving four months earlier than expected, you simply don't have the time to dedicate to their project, as you have to plan for a period of unemployment and job hunting.
Then, do your work.
On your last day, send out a broadcast email saying what a pleasure it has been to work there, and move on.
They are not worth your time. Give your next employer your efforts, they have acted on bad faith and don't deserve anything more than a view of the back of your head as you walk away.
answered 11 hours ago
Richard URichard U
94.8k68250378
94.8k68250378
3
I disagree with the "minimum required". Minimum required would include sloppy and/or slow work.
– David Thornley
9 hours ago
12
@DavidThornley You'd have a point if I hadn't included "Do your work, do it well, don't stay late or come in early"
– Richard U
9 hours ago
21
I think doing your work well but no overtime is the minimum required. Doing slow, sloppy work is less than required!
– Meg
8 hours ago
4
@Meg exactly. Doing substandard work is not doing the minimum, it is doing less than minimum. I wouldn't want to employ anyone who thought that shoddy word meets a minimum standard.
– Richard U
8 hours ago
Re not coming early or staying late, the OP is a contractor and so probably gets paid by the hour. If so, there's no reason not to put in extra hours if management allows. It's more money in the bank while you're between jobs.
– jamesqf
7 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
3
I disagree with the "minimum required". Minimum required would include sloppy and/or slow work.
– David Thornley
9 hours ago
12
@DavidThornley You'd have a point if I hadn't included "Do your work, do it well, don't stay late or come in early"
– Richard U
9 hours ago
21
I think doing your work well but no overtime is the minimum required. Doing slow, sloppy work is less than required!
– Meg
8 hours ago
4
@Meg exactly. Doing substandard work is not doing the minimum, it is doing less than minimum. I wouldn't want to employ anyone who thought that shoddy word meets a minimum standard.
– Richard U
8 hours ago
Re not coming early or staying late, the OP is a contractor and so probably gets paid by the hour. If so, there's no reason not to put in extra hours if management allows. It's more money in the bank while you're between jobs.
– jamesqf
7 hours ago
3
3
I disagree with the "minimum required". Minimum required would include sloppy and/or slow work.
– David Thornley
9 hours ago
I disagree with the "minimum required". Minimum required would include sloppy and/or slow work.
– David Thornley
9 hours ago
12
12
@DavidThornley You'd have a point if I hadn't included "Do your work, do it well, don't stay late or come in early"
– Richard U
9 hours ago
@DavidThornley You'd have a point if I hadn't included "Do your work, do it well, don't stay late or come in early"
– Richard U
9 hours ago
21
21
I think doing your work well but no overtime is the minimum required. Doing slow, sloppy work is less than required!
– Meg
8 hours ago
I think doing your work well but no overtime is the minimum required. Doing slow, sloppy work is less than required!
– Meg
8 hours ago
4
4
@Meg exactly. Doing substandard work is not doing the minimum, it is doing less than minimum. I wouldn't want to employ anyone who thought that shoddy word meets a minimum standard.
– Richard U
8 hours ago
@Meg exactly. Doing substandard work is not doing the minimum, it is doing less than minimum. I wouldn't want to employ anyone who thought that shoddy word meets a minimum standard.
– Richard U
8 hours ago
Re not coming early or staying late, the OP is a contractor and so probably gets paid by the hour. If so, there's no reason not to put in extra hours if management allows. It's more money in the bank while you're between jobs.
– jamesqf
7 hours ago
Re not coming early or staying late, the OP is a contractor and so probably gets paid by the hour. If so, there's no reason not to put in extra hours if management allows. It's more money in the bank while you're between jobs.
– jamesqf
7 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
Consider, the time to complete the project and your end date are not related in any way.
My first position would be to develop a reasonable timeline for the project then present that to management, irrespective of your end date.
At that point, they can either
- pay out your PTO and end the contract early
- offer you an extension until the project is complete
- have you insert some project time to hand it over to a remaining employee to complete.
Since you are already prepared to leave early, it's seems there is little risk to giving them a choice.
6
"Consider, the time to complete the project and your end date are not related in any way." The manager in question seems to be unaware of that reality.
– jpmc26
9 hours ago
3
@jpmc26 Right, so make them aware.
– Konrad Rudolph
7 hours ago
@jpmc26: Isn't being unaware of that sort of reality part of a manager's job description?
– jamesqf
7 hours ago
add a comment |
Consider, the time to complete the project and your end date are not related in any way.
My first position would be to develop a reasonable timeline for the project then present that to management, irrespective of your end date.
At that point, they can either
- pay out your PTO and end the contract early
- offer you an extension until the project is complete
- have you insert some project time to hand it over to a remaining employee to complete.
Since you are already prepared to leave early, it's seems there is little risk to giving them a choice.
6
"Consider, the time to complete the project and your end date are not related in any way." The manager in question seems to be unaware of that reality.
– jpmc26
9 hours ago
3
@jpmc26 Right, so make them aware.
– Konrad Rudolph
7 hours ago
@jpmc26: Isn't being unaware of that sort of reality part of a manager's job description?
– jamesqf
7 hours ago
add a comment |
Consider, the time to complete the project and your end date are not related in any way.
My first position would be to develop a reasonable timeline for the project then present that to management, irrespective of your end date.
At that point, they can either
- pay out your PTO and end the contract early
- offer you an extension until the project is complete
- have you insert some project time to hand it over to a remaining employee to complete.
Since you are already prepared to leave early, it's seems there is little risk to giving them a choice.
Consider, the time to complete the project and your end date are not related in any way.
My first position would be to develop a reasonable timeline for the project then present that to management, irrespective of your end date.
At that point, they can either
- pay out your PTO and end the contract early
- offer you an extension until the project is complete
- have you insert some project time to hand it over to a remaining employee to complete.
Since you are already prepared to leave early, it's seems there is little risk to giving them a choice.
edited 11 hours ago
answered 11 hours ago
Johns-305Johns-305
3,2901818
3,2901818
6
"Consider, the time to complete the project and your end date are not related in any way." The manager in question seems to be unaware of that reality.
– jpmc26
9 hours ago
3
@jpmc26 Right, so make them aware.
– Konrad Rudolph
7 hours ago
@jpmc26: Isn't being unaware of that sort of reality part of a manager's job description?
– jamesqf
7 hours ago
add a comment |
6
"Consider, the time to complete the project and your end date are not related in any way." The manager in question seems to be unaware of that reality.
– jpmc26
9 hours ago
3
@jpmc26 Right, so make them aware.
– Konrad Rudolph
7 hours ago
@jpmc26: Isn't being unaware of that sort of reality part of a manager's job description?
– jamesqf
7 hours ago
6
6
"Consider, the time to complete the project and your end date are not related in any way." The manager in question seems to be unaware of that reality.
– jpmc26
9 hours ago
"Consider, the time to complete the project and your end date are not related in any way." The manager in question seems to be unaware of that reality.
– jpmc26
9 hours ago
3
3
@jpmc26 Right, so make them aware.
– Konrad Rudolph
7 hours ago
@jpmc26 Right, so make them aware.
– Konrad Rudolph
7 hours ago
@jpmc26: Isn't being unaware of that sort of reality part of a manager's job description?
– jamesqf
7 hours ago
@jpmc26: Isn't being unaware of that sort of reality part of a manager's job description?
– jamesqf
7 hours ago
add a comment |
You should explain to your boss exactly why the timeline for this project is unreasonable. If they still decide that your end date remains unchanged then you simply do your assigned work to the best of your ability until either that date has arrived or you have found a new job. You should be looking for a new job no matter what while you still have one as you know that you will likely no longer be working with this company in the future.
Also, one thing to consider about end dates is that they can be extended. I have worked at a company that was bought out and all employees were given end dates but some were extended due to the circumstances regarding unfinished work that was still necessary. If this project is as important as you have implied, it is possible to have your end date extended however I wouldn't count on that. Brush up your resume and start applying to new companies.
add a comment |
You should explain to your boss exactly why the timeline for this project is unreasonable. If they still decide that your end date remains unchanged then you simply do your assigned work to the best of your ability until either that date has arrived or you have found a new job. You should be looking for a new job no matter what while you still have one as you know that you will likely no longer be working with this company in the future.
Also, one thing to consider about end dates is that they can be extended. I have worked at a company that was bought out and all employees were given end dates but some were extended due to the circumstances regarding unfinished work that was still necessary. If this project is as important as you have implied, it is possible to have your end date extended however I wouldn't count on that. Brush up your resume and start applying to new companies.
add a comment |
You should explain to your boss exactly why the timeline for this project is unreasonable. If they still decide that your end date remains unchanged then you simply do your assigned work to the best of your ability until either that date has arrived or you have found a new job. You should be looking for a new job no matter what while you still have one as you know that you will likely no longer be working with this company in the future.
Also, one thing to consider about end dates is that they can be extended. I have worked at a company that was bought out and all employees were given end dates but some were extended due to the circumstances regarding unfinished work that was still necessary. If this project is as important as you have implied, it is possible to have your end date extended however I wouldn't count on that. Brush up your resume and start applying to new companies.
You should explain to your boss exactly why the timeline for this project is unreasonable. If they still decide that your end date remains unchanged then you simply do your assigned work to the best of your ability until either that date has arrived or you have found a new job. You should be looking for a new job no matter what while you still have one as you know that you will likely no longer be working with this company in the future.
Also, one thing to consider about end dates is that they can be extended. I have worked at a company that was bought out and all employees were given end dates but some were extended due to the circumstances regarding unfinished work that was still necessary. If this project is as important as you have implied, it is possible to have your end date extended however I wouldn't count on that. Brush up your resume and start applying to new companies.
answered 11 hours ago
sf02sf02
6,4383828
6,4383828
add a comment |
add a comment |
Because of this, I am planning on giving them an ultimatum: they can either guarantee me work until the official end-date of my contract (in July), or I will leave immediately without doing any work on this project.
Assuming you are not bluffing, this gives you two possible outcomes:
a.) You are without a job now.
b.) You are without a job in July.
Would you consider this course of action reasonable? If so, would there be any downsides, besides the possibility of being unemployed for a few months?
I don't see any other downsides, but I don't think it is the best alternative out there.
Either way you will have to look for a new job, so you should as soon as possible.
My contract gives both parties the right to sever it at any time, so I am within my rights.
This gives you the option to quit the moment you got your new job. This seems more flexible to me than to look for a job that starts exactly when your contract is finished.
You don't owe your employer finishing the project.
New contributor
add a comment |
Because of this, I am planning on giving them an ultimatum: they can either guarantee me work until the official end-date of my contract (in July), or I will leave immediately without doing any work on this project.
Assuming you are not bluffing, this gives you two possible outcomes:
a.) You are without a job now.
b.) You are without a job in July.
Would you consider this course of action reasonable? If so, would there be any downsides, besides the possibility of being unemployed for a few months?
I don't see any other downsides, but I don't think it is the best alternative out there.
Either way you will have to look for a new job, so you should as soon as possible.
My contract gives both parties the right to sever it at any time, so I am within my rights.
This gives you the option to quit the moment you got your new job. This seems more flexible to me than to look for a job that starts exactly when your contract is finished.
You don't owe your employer finishing the project.
New contributor
add a comment |
Because of this, I am planning on giving them an ultimatum: they can either guarantee me work until the official end-date of my contract (in July), or I will leave immediately without doing any work on this project.
Assuming you are not bluffing, this gives you two possible outcomes:
a.) You are without a job now.
b.) You are without a job in July.
Would you consider this course of action reasonable? If so, would there be any downsides, besides the possibility of being unemployed for a few months?
I don't see any other downsides, but I don't think it is the best alternative out there.
Either way you will have to look for a new job, so you should as soon as possible.
My contract gives both parties the right to sever it at any time, so I am within my rights.
This gives you the option to quit the moment you got your new job. This seems more flexible to me than to look for a job that starts exactly when your contract is finished.
You don't owe your employer finishing the project.
New contributor
Because of this, I am planning on giving them an ultimatum: they can either guarantee me work until the official end-date of my contract (in July), or I will leave immediately without doing any work on this project.
Assuming you are not bluffing, this gives you two possible outcomes:
a.) You are without a job now.
b.) You are without a job in July.
Would you consider this course of action reasonable? If so, would there be any downsides, besides the possibility of being unemployed for a few months?
I don't see any other downsides, but I don't think it is the best alternative out there.
Either way you will have to look for a new job, so you should as soon as possible.
My contract gives both parties the right to sever it at any time, so I am within my rights.
This gives you the option to quit the moment you got your new job. This seems more flexible to me than to look for a job that starts exactly when your contract is finished.
You don't owe your employer finishing the project.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 7 hours ago
HelenaHelena
1314
1314
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Would you consider this course of action reasonable? If so, would there be any downsides, besides the possibility of being unemployed for a few months?
It's not unreasonable, although I would be more focused on job-hunting than giving ultimatums.
The downside of being unemployed is that it makes the process of job-hunting more difficult for several reasons (some exposed here and here), not to mention the lack of income and having to depend on savings, etc., so I say that your priority should be in finding a new job.
I suggest you simultaneously do the following:
Job-hunt ASAP. Start looking for new jobs, interviews, etc right now, while you are still employed.
Start working on the docs and tests, but also expose to your boss the reasons why such due date is not achievable, and present a date that you consider could be achieved. This will give you at least until March to line up a new job and avoid the unemployment gap.
However, if your boss continues to be unreasonable, and you feel OK and confident in giving the ultimatum (and its possible outcomes), then the way to go is to proceed to give it.
Just, whatever you do, start job-hunting ASAP.
add a comment |
Would you consider this course of action reasonable? If so, would there be any downsides, besides the possibility of being unemployed for a few months?
It's not unreasonable, although I would be more focused on job-hunting than giving ultimatums.
The downside of being unemployed is that it makes the process of job-hunting more difficult for several reasons (some exposed here and here), not to mention the lack of income and having to depend on savings, etc., so I say that your priority should be in finding a new job.
I suggest you simultaneously do the following:
Job-hunt ASAP. Start looking for new jobs, interviews, etc right now, while you are still employed.
Start working on the docs and tests, but also expose to your boss the reasons why such due date is not achievable, and present a date that you consider could be achieved. This will give you at least until March to line up a new job and avoid the unemployment gap.
However, if your boss continues to be unreasonable, and you feel OK and confident in giving the ultimatum (and its possible outcomes), then the way to go is to proceed to give it.
Just, whatever you do, start job-hunting ASAP.
add a comment |
Would you consider this course of action reasonable? If so, would there be any downsides, besides the possibility of being unemployed for a few months?
It's not unreasonable, although I would be more focused on job-hunting than giving ultimatums.
The downside of being unemployed is that it makes the process of job-hunting more difficult for several reasons (some exposed here and here), not to mention the lack of income and having to depend on savings, etc., so I say that your priority should be in finding a new job.
I suggest you simultaneously do the following:
Job-hunt ASAP. Start looking for new jobs, interviews, etc right now, while you are still employed.
Start working on the docs and tests, but also expose to your boss the reasons why such due date is not achievable, and present a date that you consider could be achieved. This will give you at least until March to line up a new job and avoid the unemployment gap.
However, if your boss continues to be unreasonable, and you feel OK and confident in giving the ultimatum (and its possible outcomes), then the way to go is to proceed to give it.
Just, whatever you do, start job-hunting ASAP.
Would you consider this course of action reasonable? If so, would there be any downsides, besides the possibility of being unemployed for a few months?
It's not unreasonable, although I would be more focused on job-hunting than giving ultimatums.
The downside of being unemployed is that it makes the process of job-hunting more difficult for several reasons (some exposed here and here), not to mention the lack of income and having to depend on savings, etc., so I say that your priority should be in finding a new job.
I suggest you simultaneously do the following:
Job-hunt ASAP. Start looking for new jobs, interviews, etc right now, while you are still employed.
Start working on the docs and tests, but also expose to your boss the reasons why such due date is not achievable, and present a date that you consider could be achieved. This will give you at least until March to line up a new job and avoid the unemployment gap.
However, if your boss continues to be unreasonable, and you feel OK and confident in giving the ultimatum (and its possible outcomes), then the way to go is to proceed to give it.
Just, whatever you do, start job-hunting ASAP.
edited 7 hours ago
Kat
2,77221318
2,77221318
answered 11 hours ago
DarkCygnusDarkCygnus
36.4k1773155
36.4k1773155
add a comment |
add a comment |
Complex or not, you are paid contractually. Trying to finish the complex project is the goal for your boss, but the goal for you, as a contractor worker, is to show up and do your best work.
Simply put, if finishing is not reasonable, you should tell him you probably won't finish in the time allotted, but you will do your best.
Tell them in writing/email. Make sure there is a record and bcc your own private email account to make sure you have a record. Just in case, as they say.
– StephenG
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Complex or not, you are paid contractually. Trying to finish the complex project is the goal for your boss, but the goal for you, as a contractor worker, is to show up and do your best work.
Simply put, if finishing is not reasonable, you should tell him you probably won't finish in the time allotted, but you will do your best.
Tell them in writing/email. Make sure there is a record and bcc your own private email account to make sure you have a record. Just in case, as they say.
– StephenG
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Complex or not, you are paid contractually. Trying to finish the complex project is the goal for your boss, but the goal for you, as a contractor worker, is to show up and do your best work.
Simply put, if finishing is not reasonable, you should tell him you probably won't finish in the time allotted, but you will do your best.
Complex or not, you are paid contractually. Trying to finish the complex project is the goal for your boss, but the goal for you, as a contractor worker, is to show up and do your best work.
Simply put, if finishing is not reasonable, you should tell him you probably won't finish in the time allotted, but you will do your best.
answered 4 hours ago
MikeMike
712712
712712
Tell them in writing/email. Make sure there is a record and bcc your own private email account to make sure you have a record. Just in case, as they say.
– StephenG
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Tell them in writing/email. Make sure there is a record and bcc your own private email account to make sure you have a record. Just in case, as they say.
– StephenG
1 hour ago
Tell them in writing/email. Make sure there is a record and bcc your own private email account to make sure you have a record. Just in case, as they say.
– StephenG
1 hour ago
Tell them in writing/email. Make sure there is a record and bcc your own private email account to make sure you have a record. Just in case, as they say.
– StephenG
1 hour ago
add a comment |
A professional way to look at this in the way of project management.
The basic variables are:
- Number of people
- Length of elapsed time.
- Quality
- Scope
As everyone ever responsible for managing a software project has learnt, you have to explain to stakeholders that you cannot fix all of these externally and expect it to add up.
If the company wants to fix the project scope, then they need to vary something else.
Alternatively, you can make the scope a variable. Break the project up into the usual 2-3 day tasks and require the business to prioritise on a regular basis. You simply work through them in order and get as far as you can.
A side effect of this approach in your context is that if by the end of March you are half done, they are in a position to extend. This amount of time is just about enough that if you assign story points to tasks you should have a velocity measure to estimate the overall amount of time required.
Obviously, other answers already articulate some of the ways to communicate this.
Bottom line: Try to take the high ground, and at the same time have a contingency plan for yourself.
add a comment |
A professional way to look at this in the way of project management.
The basic variables are:
- Number of people
- Length of elapsed time.
- Quality
- Scope
As everyone ever responsible for managing a software project has learnt, you have to explain to stakeholders that you cannot fix all of these externally and expect it to add up.
If the company wants to fix the project scope, then they need to vary something else.
Alternatively, you can make the scope a variable. Break the project up into the usual 2-3 day tasks and require the business to prioritise on a regular basis. You simply work through them in order and get as far as you can.
A side effect of this approach in your context is that if by the end of March you are half done, they are in a position to extend. This amount of time is just about enough that if you assign story points to tasks you should have a velocity measure to estimate the overall amount of time required.
Obviously, other answers already articulate some of the ways to communicate this.
Bottom line: Try to take the high ground, and at the same time have a contingency plan for yourself.
add a comment |
A professional way to look at this in the way of project management.
The basic variables are:
- Number of people
- Length of elapsed time.
- Quality
- Scope
As everyone ever responsible for managing a software project has learnt, you have to explain to stakeholders that you cannot fix all of these externally and expect it to add up.
If the company wants to fix the project scope, then they need to vary something else.
Alternatively, you can make the scope a variable. Break the project up into the usual 2-3 day tasks and require the business to prioritise on a regular basis. You simply work through them in order and get as far as you can.
A side effect of this approach in your context is that if by the end of March you are half done, they are in a position to extend. This amount of time is just about enough that if you assign story points to tasks you should have a velocity measure to estimate the overall amount of time required.
Obviously, other answers already articulate some of the ways to communicate this.
Bottom line: Try to take the high ground, and at the same time have a contingency plan for yourself.
A professional way to look at this in the way of project management.
The basic variables are:
- Number of people
- Length of elapsed time.
- Quality
- Scope
As everyone ever responsible for managing a software project has learnt, you have to explain to stakeholders that you cannot fix all of these externally and expect it to add up.
If the company wants to fix the project scope, then they need to vary something else.
Alternatively, you can make the scope a variable. Break the project up into the usual 2-3 day tasks and require the business to prioritise on a regular basis. You simply work through them in order and get as far as you can.
A side effect of this approach in your context is that if by the end of March you are half done, they are in a position to extend. This amount of time is just about enough that if you assign story points to tasks you should have a velocity measure to estimate the overall amount of time required.
Obviously, other answers already articulate some of the ways to communicate this.
Bottom line: Try to take the high ground, and at the same time have a contingency plan for yourself.
answered 32 mins ago
KeithKeith
44723
44723
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to The Workplace Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f128876%2fmy-boss-gave-me-an-end-date-for-my-job-but-he-wants-a-very-complex-project-done%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
17
They can always pay you in lieu of that PTO you have yet to spend, just saying...
– DarkCygnus
11 hours ago
9
" would there be any downsides, besides the possibility of being unemployed for a few months?" - a poor reference in the future. You may not care.
– Joe Strazzere
11 hours ago
4
Have you expressed any of your concerns to your boss, specifically as it relates to the PTO your owed? Curious though, most contractors don't get paid time off....
– Mister Positive
11 hours ago
10
>"they can guarantee me work until the official end-date ..." They will simply: lie to your face. As they have been lying to your face for seven months.
– Fattie
11 hours ago
21
Complex or not, you are paid contractually. Trying to finish the complex project is the goal for your boss, but the goal for you, as a contractor worker, is to show up and do your best work. Simply put, if finishing is not reasonable, you should tell him you probably won't finish in the time allotted, and explain why or show your estimate.
– Mike
11 hours ago