Word meaning “to startle someone by surreptitiously poking them in the sides, from behind”
I inadvertently caused a great deal of amusement among a group of friends by incorrectly using the word "goose" to describe the action of sneaking up behind a person and poking, tickling, or touching them simultaneously on both sides (above the hips, below the rib cage) in order to startle them.
The intended usage (that is to say, "the only relevant meaning of this word inside my head") additionally implies that the target of this action would be person who would not find the behavior objectionable or inappropriate.
As it turns out, the way my comment was interpreted by everyone present was consistent with the only American English definition for "to goose" that is even remotely similar to what I intended. It is a slang definition that refers to surprise contact occurring somewhat lower and toward the back (specifically, on or between the buttocks, like the surprise nipping of a goose), and often with a negative or invasive connotation. British English appears to have a similarly negative and sexual – though perhaps less anatomically precise – slang definition.
Is there any genuinely plausible sense (or perhaps a regional vernacular, particularly in the United States) in which my usage was correct? As a native speaker, I'm confused about how I came to believe that this usage of the word had a different meaning than it apparently does, and if there's a sensible explanation of how I inferred its meaning incorrectly (such as, "well, that is what people mean when they say it in Central Kansas") then I am curious to know.
I did find in informal definition "to prod or urge to action or an emotional reaction" but this seems like it might be a stretch, and in any event this is overshadowed by the fact that it is not the sense of the word that was obvious to any of the hearers.
I am inclined (now) to think there may not be a sense in which my usage could reasonably construed as correct, and if that is indeed the case, then is there actually a word to specifically describe using this tactic of surprise touch to the sides, from behind, in order to startle someone, particularly in a non-sexual sense among friends?
single-word-requests slang colloquialisms
asked Sep 18 '15 at 18:49
Michael - sqlbotMichael - sqlbot
17317
add a comment |
I inadvertently caused a great deal of amusement among a group of friends by incorrectly using the word "goose" to describe the action of sneaking up behind a person and poking, tickling, or touching them simultaneously on both sides (above the hips, below the rib cage) in order to startle them.
The intended usage (that is to say, "the only relevant meaning of this word inside my head") additionally implies that the target of this action would be person who would not find the behavior objectionable or inappropriate.
As it turns out, the way my comment was interpreted by everyone present was consistent with the only American English definition for "to goose" that is even remotely similar to what I intended. It is a slang definition that refers to surprise contact occurring somewhat lower and toward the back (specifically, on or between the buttocks, like the surprise nipping of a goose), and often with a negative or invasive connotation. British English appears to have a similarly negative and sexual – though perhaps less anatomically precise – slang definition.
Is there any genuinely plausible sense (or perhaps a regional vernacular, particularly in the United States) in which my usage was correct? As a native speaker, I'm confused about how I came to believe that this usage of the word had a different meaning than it apparently does, and if there's a sensible explanation of how I inferred its meaning incorrectly (such as, "well, that is what people mean when they say it in Central Kansas") then I am curious to know.
I did find in informal definition "to prod or urge to action or an emotional reaction" but this seems like it might be a stretch, and in any event this is overshadowed by the fact that it is not the sense of the word that was obvious to any of the hearers.
I am inclined (now) to think there may not be a sense in which my usage could reasonably construed as correct, and if that is indeed the case, then is there actually a word to specifically describe using this tactic of surprise touch to the sides, from behind, in order to startle someone, particularly in a non-sexual sense among friends?
single-word-requests slang colloquialisms
asked Sep 18 '15 at 18:49
Michael - sqlbotMichael - sqlbot
17317
There is absolutely no sense, whatever, in which your usage was correct. "goose" only means "on the crack" "in the crack" or perhaps at best "sexually on , in, or around 'the ass'". same in all regions. "I'm confused about how I came to believe that this usage of the word had a different meaning" I find it utterly commonplace that people (including myself) have unique unusual misunderstandings of words; there is nothing to explain.
– Fattie
Sep 18 '15 at 18:56
Regarding the "double tickle from behind" there's no single common term for that. When you say "poke" it's usually understood to mean a light-hearted poke, somewhere innocent (as opposed to a goose or perhaps pinch) - so that's something of an answer. {Note though that "poke" can be a light-hearted term for "have intercourse" in, say, Australia.)
– Fattie
Sep 18 '15 at 18:58
1
I know how you came to believe it was innocuous. The children's game Duck, Duck, Goose!.
– jxh
Sep 18 '15 at 23:53
add a comment |
I inadvertently caused a great deal of amusement among a group of friends by incorrectly using the word "goose" to describe the action of sneaking up behind a person and poking, tickling, or touching them simultaneously on both sides (above the hips, below the rib cage) in order to startle them.
The intended usage (that is to say, "the only relevant meaning of this word inside my head") additionally implies that the target of this action would be person who would not find the behavior objectionable or inappropriate.
As it turns out, the way my comment was interpreted by everyone present was consistent with the only American English definition for "to goose" that is even remotely similar to what I intended. It is a slang definition that refers to surprise contact occurring somewhat lower and toward the back (specifically, on or between the buttocks, like the surprise nipping of a goose), and often with a negative or invasive connotation. British English appears to have a similarly negative and sexual – though perhaps less anatomically precise – slang definition.
Is there any genuinely plausible sense (or perhaps a regional vernacular, particularly in the United States) in which my usage was correct? As a native speaker, I'm confused about how I came to believe that this usage of the word had a different meaning than it apparently does, and if there's a sensible explanation of how I inferred its meaning incorrectly (such as, "well, that is what people mean when they say it in Central Kansas") then I am curious to know.
I did find in informal definition "to prod or urge to action or an emotional reaction" but this seems like it might be a stretch, and in any event this is overshadowed by the fact that it is not the sense of the word that was obvious to any of the hearers.
I am inclined (now) to think there may not be a sense in which my usage could reasonably construed as correct, and if that is indeed the case, then is there actually a word to specifically describe using this tactic of surprise touch to the sides, from behind, in order to startle someone, particularly in a non-sexual sense among friends?
single-word-requests slang colloquialisms
asked Sep 18 '15 at 18:49
Michael - sqlbotMichael - sqlbot
17317
I inadvertently caused a great deal of amusement among a group of friends by incorrectly using the word "goose" to describe the action of sneaking up behind a person and poking, tickling, or touching them simultaneously on both sides (above the hips, below the rib cage) in order to startle them.
The intended usage (that is to say, "the only relevant meaning of this word inside my head") additionally implies that the target of this action would be person who would not find the behavior objectionable or inappropriate.
As it turns out, the way my comment was interpreted by everyone present was consistent with the only American English definition for "to goose" that is even remotely similar to what I intended. It is a slang definition that refers to surprise contact occurring somewhat lower and toward the back (specifically, on or between the buttocks, like the surprise nipping of a goose), and often with a negative or invasive connotation. British English appears to have a similarly negative and sexual – though perhaps less anatomically precise – slang definition.
Is there any genuinely plausible sense (or perhaps a regional vernacular, particularly in the United States) in which my usage was correct? As a native speaker, I'm confused about how I came to believe that this usage of the word had a different meaning than it apparently does, and if there's a sensible explanation of how I inferred its meaning incorrectly (such as, "well, that is what people mean when they say it in Central Kansas") then I am curious to know.
I did find in informal definition "to prod or urge to action or an emotional reaction" but this seems like it might be a stretch, and in any event this is overshadowed by the fact that it is not the sense of the word that was obvious to any of the hearers.
I am inclined (now) to think there may not be a sense in which my usage could reasonably construed as correct, and if that is indeed the case, then is there actually a word to specifically describe using this tactic of surprise touch to the sides, from behind, in order to startle someone, particularly in a non-sexual sense among friends?
single-word-requests slang colloquialisms
single-word-requests slang colloquialisms
asked Sep 18 '15 at 18:49
Michael - sqlbotMichael - sqlbot
17317
asked Sep 18 '15 at 18:49
Michael - sqlbotMichael - sqlbot
17317
asked Sep 18 '15 at 18:49
Michael - sqlbotMichael - sqlbot
17317
asked Sep 18 '15 at 18:49
Michael - sqlbotMichael - sqlbot
17317
asked Sep 18 '15 at 18:49
Michael - sqlbotMichael - sqlbot
17317
17317
There is absolutely no sense, whatever, in which your usage was correct. "goose" only means "on the crack" "in the crack" or perhaps at best "sexually on , in, or around 'the ass'". same in all regions. "I'm confused about how I came to believe that this usage of the word had a different meaning" I find it utterly commonplace that people (including myself) have unique unusual misunderstandings of words; there is nothing to explain.
– Fattie
Sep 18 '15 at 18:56
Regarding the "double tickle from behind" there's no single common term for that. When you say "poke" it's usually understood to mean a light-hearted poke, somewhere innocent (as opposed to a goose or perhaps pinch) - so that's something of an answer. {Note though that "poke" can be a light-hearted term for "have intercourse" in, say, Australia.)
– Fattie
Sep 18 '15 at 18:58
1
I know how you came to believe it was innocuous. The children's game Duck, Duck, Goose!.
– jxh
Sep 18 '15 at 23:53
add a comment |
There is absolutely no sense, whatever, in which your usage was correct. "goose" only means "on the crack" "in the crack" or perhaps at best "sexually on , in, or around 'the ass'". same in all regions. "I'm confused about how I came to believe that this usage of the word had a different meaning" I find it utterly commonplace that people (including myself) have unique unusual misunderstandings of words; there is nothing to explain.
– Fattie
Sep 18 '15 at 18:56
Regarding the "double tickle from behind" there's no single common term for that. When you say "poke" it's usually understood to mean a light-hearted poke, somewhere innocent (as opposed to a goose or perhaps pinch) - so that's something of an answer. {Note though that "poke" can be a light-hearted term for "have intercourse" in, say, Australia.)
– Fattie
Sep 18 '15 at 18:58
1
I know how you came to believe it was innocuous. The children's game Duck, Duck, Goose!.
– jxh
Sep 18 '15 at 23:53
There is absolutely no sense, whatever, in which your usage was correct. "goose" only means "on the crack" "in the crack" or perhaps at best "sexually on , in, or around 'the ass'". same in all regions. "I'm confused about how I came to believe that this usage of the word had a different meaning" I find it utterly commonplace that people (including myself) have unique unusual misunderstandings of words; there is nothing to explain.
– Fattie
Sep 18 '15 at 18:56
There is absolutely no sense, whatever, in which your usage was correct. "goose" only means "on the crack" "in the crack" or perhaps at best "sexually on , in, or around 'the ass'". same in all regions. "I'm confused about how I came to believe that this usage of the word had a different meaning" I find it utterly commonplace that people (including myself) have unique unusual misunderstandings of words; there is nothing to explain.
– Fattie
Sep 18 '15 at 18:56
Regarding the "double tickle from behind" there's no single common term for that. When you say "poke" it's usually understood to mean a light-hearted poke, somewhere innocent (as opposed to a goose or perhaps pinch) - so that's something of an answer. {Note though that "poke" can be a light-hearted term for "have intercourse" in, say, Australia.)
– Fattie
Sep 18 '15 at 18:58
Regarding the "double tickle from behind" there's no single common term for that. When you say "poke" it's usually understood to mean a light-hearted poke, somewhere innocent (as opposed to a goose or perhaps pinch) - so that's something of an answer. {Note though that "poke" can be a light-hearted term for "have intercourse" in, say, Australia.)
– Fattie
Sep 18 '15 at 18:58
1
1
I know how you came to believe it was innocuous. The children's game Duck, Duck, Goose!.
– jxh
Sep 18 '15 at 23:53
I know how you came to believe it was innocuous. The children's game Duck, Duck, Goose!.
– jxh
Sep 18 '15 at 23:53
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
Your sense is not a stretch, although a bit too precise in the "simultaneously on both sides (above the hips, below the rib cage)" element.
- slang. To poke, tickle, etc., (a person) in a sensitive part, esp. the genital or anal regions; sometimes, more specifically, = fuck v. 1.
....
1906 Dial. Notes 3 138 Goose, to create nervous excitement in a person by pointing a finger at him or by touching or tickling him and making a peculiar whistle.
1932 J. T. Farrell Young Lonigan v. 205 Paulie slapped Denny's face. Denny bawled... Paulie goosed him. Denny squirmed.
...
1967 E. Partridge Dict. Slang Suppl. 1152/2 Goose, the predominant post-World War II meaning is ‘to jab a finger in ano, in order to surprise or annoy’.
["goose, v.". OED Online. September 2015. Oxford University Press. http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/80030 (accessed September 18, 2015).]
As you can see from the sequence of quotes and the meaning of the final one, if your sense was transmitted to you by someone, a grandparent for example, who learned the term before the end of WWII (during which the sense of 'to goose' was considerably vulgarized by soldiers), the sense you learned would correspond with what that person was likely to have encountered--aside from the precision I already pointed out.
Nonetheless, your use of the term with the sense you learned is now much more likely to evoke the more vulgar sense than what you intend, even imprecisely (a simple poke to startle)...although I, for one, depending on the context (and particularly the speaker or writer) understand it in the general sense "to poke, tickle, etc., in a sensitive part", rather than the more specific, vulgar sense commonly used.
If you're looking for a replacement phrase or term, what I've heard used is "a poke in the ribs", as in
1949 Lockhart (Texas) Post-Reg. 3 Mar. She laughed and gave him a discomposing poke in the ribs.
This is the common contemporary phrase closest in meaning to your sense of 'a goose'. Obviously it moves the location you specified upward on the torso, omits the simultaneous duality of your poke, and doesn't accommodate concise verbal use.
answered Sep 18 '15 at 19:31
JELJEL
26.9k45190
add a comment |
I agree with Joe Blow's comment - "goose" as a verb invariably means "to grab in the buttocks." As a somewhat reputable example, it's classed under "Romantic Interactions" in the life simulation video game The Sims 2, one of the best-selling PC video games of all time. Here's a video of the action being performed in-game.
Moving on to a better-suited word: when I was in elementary school (5 - 6 years ago), the word of choice to describe that exact action was taze. The second definition on Urban Dictionary confirms this, with 49 upvotes.
taze
when someone pokes your sides from behind
guy : tazes girl
girl :hahahah stop it! :)
by aurora_is_ninja December 24, 2010
This isn't the best word that could be used to describe this, as it has a homophone tase, which means "to shoot with a Taser gun" (Merriam-Webster) - obviously a much more shocking action than your intent.
I haven't heard this word used since about 2010, but I would still recognise its meaning if someone said it to me today. I'm Canadian, so I can't speak for its use elsewhere.
answered Jan 27 '16 at 5:50
OperaticSkeletonOperaticSkeleton
487316
3
I suspect that the "taze" of poking someone is derived from the "tase" meaning to shoot with a taser gun, and is based on the similar shock effect.
– AndyT
Jan 27 '16 at 11:51
add a comment |
Ok, well, poking someone above the waist and below the ribcage is called "tasering" like EVERYWHERE. People who poke you there it makes you feel tickly.
answered Mar 4 '17 at 7:50
MaryMary
1
2
Thanks, @Mary, but we probably need a citation to justify the assertion that this usage is common "like EVERYWHERE."
– Michael - sqlbot
Mar 4 '17 at 14:25
add a comment |
My experience is that Goose is specific to the round back area. Personally I use the word exactly as defined "to prod or urge to action or an emotional reaction", esp in the AD biz when referring to a desired action by the client/consumer. Not sure why that particular definition is surprising to you...
answered Jan 19 '18 at 19:06
Big D RockBig D Rock
1
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f274774%2fword-meaning-to-startle-someone-by-surreptitiously-poking-them-in-the-sides-fr%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Your sense is not a stretch, although a bit too precise in the "simultaneously on both sides (above the hips, below the rib cage)" element.
- slang. To poke, tickle, etc., (a person) in a sensitive part, esp. the genital or anal regions; sometimes, more specifically, = fuck v. 1.
....
1906 Dial. Notes 3 138 Goose, to create nervous excitement in a person by pointing a finger at him or by touching or tickling him and making a peculiar whistle.
1932 J. T. Farrell Young Lonigan v. 205 Paulie slapped Denny's face. Denny bawled... Paulie goosed him. Denny squirmed.
...
1967 E. Partridge Dict. Slang Suppl. 1152/2 Goose, the predominant post-World War II meaning is ‘to jab a finger in ano, in order to surprise or annoy’.
["goose, v.". OED Online. September 2015. Oxford University Press. http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/80030 (accessed September 18, 2015).]
As you can see from the sequence of quotes and the meaning of the final one, if your sense was transmitted to you by someone, a grandparent for example, who learned the term before the end of WWII (during which the sense of 'to goose' was considerably vulgarized by soldiers), the sense you learned would correspond with what that person was likely to have encountered--aside from the precision I already pointed out.
Nonetheless, your use of the term with the sense you learned is now much more likely to evoke the more vulgar sense than what you intend, even imprecisely (a simple poke to startle)...although I, for one, depending on the context (and particularly the speaker or writer) understand it in the general sense "to poke, tickle, etc., in a sensitive part", rather than the more specific, vulgar sense commonly used.
If you're looking for a replacement phrase or term, what I've heard used is "a poke in the ribs", as in
1949 Lockhart (Texas) Post-Reg. 3 Mar. She laughed and gave him a discomposing poke in the ribs.
This is the common contemporary phrase closest in meaning to your sense of 'a goose'. Obviously it moves the location you specified upward on the torso, omits the simultaneous duality of your poke, and doesn't accommodate concise verbal use.
answered Sep 18 '15 at 19:31
JELJEL
26.9k45190
add a comment |
Your sense is not a stretch, although a bit too precise in the "simultaneously on both sides (above the hips, below the rib cage)" element.
- slang. To poke, tickle, etc., (a person) in a sensitive part, esp. the genital or anal regions; sometimes, more specifically, = fuck v. 1.
....
1906 Dial. Notes 3 138 Goose, to create nervous excitement in a person by pointing a finger at him or by touching or tickling him and making a peculiar whistle.
1932 J. T. Farrell Young Lonigan v. 205 Paulie slapped Denny's face. Denny bawled... Paulie goosed him. Denny squirmed.
...
1967 E. Partridge Dict. Slang Suppl. 1152/2 Goose, the predominant post-World War II meaning is ‘to jab a finger in ano, in order to surprise or annoy’.
["goose, v.". OED Online. September 2015. Oxford University Press. http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/80030 (accessed September 18, 2015).]
As you can see from the sequence of quotes and the meaning of the final one, if your sense was transmitted to you by someone, a grandparent for example, who learned the term before the end of WWII (during which the sense of 'to goose' was considerably vulgarized by soldiers), the sense you learned would correspond with what that person was likely to have encountered--aside from the precision I already pointed out.
Nonetheless, your use of the term with the sense you learned is now much more likely to evoke the more vulgar sense than what you intend, even imprecisely (a simple poke to startle)...although I, for one, depending on the context (and particularly the speaker or writer) understand it in the general sense "to poke, tickle, etc., in a sensitive part", rather than the more specific, vulgar sense commonly used.
If you're looking for a replacement phrase or term, what I've heard used is "a poke in the ribs", as in
1949 Lockhart (Texas) Post-Reg. 3 Mar. She laughed and gave him a discomposing poke in the ribs.
This is the common contemporary phrase closest in meaning to your sense of 'a goose'. Obviously it moves the location you specified upward on the torso, omits the simultaneous duality of your poke, and doesn't accommodate concise verbal use.
answered Sep 18 '15 at 19:31
JELJEL
26.9k45190
add a comment |
Your sense is not a stretch, although a bit too precise in the "simultaneously on both sides (above the hips, below the rib cage)" element.
- slang. To poke, tickle, etc., (a person) in a sensitive part, esp. the genital or anal regions; sometimes, more specifically, = fuck v. 1.
....
1906 Dial. Notes 3 138 Goose, to create nervous excitement in a person by pointing a finger at him or by touching or tickling him and making a peculiar whistle.
1932 J. T. Farrell Young Lonigan v. 205 Paulie slapped Denny's face. Denny bawled... Paulie goosed him. Denny squirmed.
...
1967 E. Partridge Dict. Slang Suppl. 1152/2 Goose, the predominant post-World War II meaning is ‘to jab a finger in ano, in order to surprise or annoy’.
["goose, v.". OED Online. September 2015. Oxford University Press. http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/80030 (accessed September 18, 2015).]
As you can see from the sequence of quotes and the meaning of the final one, if your sense was transmitted to you by someone, a grandparent for example, who learned the term before the end of WWII (during which the sense of 'to goose' was considerably vulgarized by soldiers), the sense you learned would correspond with what that person was likely to have encountered--aside from the precision I already pointed out.
Nonetheless, your use of the term with the sense you learned is now much more likely to evoke the more vulgar sense than what you intend, even imprecisely (a simple poke to startle)...although I, for one, depending on the context (and particularly the speaker or writer) understand it in the general sense "to poke, tickle, etc., in a sensitive part", rather than the more specific, vulgar sense commonly used.
If you're looking for a replacement phrase or term, what I've heard used is "a poke in the ribs", as in
1949 Lockhart (Texas) Post-Reg. 3 Mar. She laughed and gave him a discomposing poke in the ribs.
This is the common contemporary phrase closest in meaning to your sense of 'a goose'. Obviously it moves the location you specified upward on the torso, omits the simultaneous duality of your poke, and doesn't accommodate concise verbal use.
answered Sep 18 '15 at 19:31
JELJEL
26.9k45190
Your sense is not a stretch, although a bit too precise in the "simultaneously on both sides (above the hips, below the rib cage)" element.
- slang. To poke, tickle, etc., (a person) in a sensitive part, esp. the genital or anal regions; sometimes, more specifically, = fuck v. 1.
....
1906 Dial. Notes 3 138 Goose, to create nervous excitement in a person by pointing a finger at him or by touching or tickling him and making a peculiar whistle.
1932 J. T. Farrell Young Lonigan v. 205 Paulie slapped Denny's face. Denny bawled... Paulie goosed him. Denny squirmed.
...
1967 E. Partridge Dict. Slang Suppl. 1152/2 Goose, the predominant post-World War II meaning is ‘to jab a finger in ano, in order to surprise or annoy’.
["goose, v.". OED Online. September 2015. Oxford University Press. http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/80030 (accessed September 18, 2015).]
As you can see from the sequence of quotes and the meaning of the final one, if your sense was transmitted to you by someone, a grandparent for example, who learned the term before the end of WWII (during which the sense of 'to goose' was considerably vulgarized by soldiers), the sense you learned would correspond with what that person was likely to have encountered--aside from the precision I already pointed out.
Nonetheless, your use of the term with the sense you learned is now much more likely to evoke the more vulgar sense than what you intend, even imprecisely (a simple poke to startle)...although I, for one, depending on the context (and particularly the speaker or writer) understand it in the general sense "to poke, tickle, etc., in a sensitive part", rather than the more specific, vulgar sense commonly used.
If you're looking for a replacement phrase or term, what I've heard used is "a poke in the ribs", as in
1949 Lockhart (Texas) Post-Reg. 3 Mar. She laughed and gave him a discomposing poke in the ribs.
This is the common contemporary phrase closest in meaning to your sense of 'a goose'. Obviously it moves the location you specified upward on the torso, omits the simultaneous duality of your poke, and doesn't accommodate concise verbal use.
answered Sep 18 '15 at 19:31
JELJEL
26.9k45190
edited Sep 18 '15 at 20:19
answered Sep 18 '15 at 19:31
JELJEL
26.9k45190
answered Sep 18 '15 at 19:31
JELJEL
26.9k45190
answered Sep 18 '15 at 19:31
JELJEL
26.9k45190
26.9k45190
add a comment |
add a comment |
I agree with Joe Blow's comment - "goose" as a verb invariably means "to grab in the buttocks." As a somewhat reputable example, it's classed under "Romantic Interactions" in the life simulation video game The Sims 2, one of the best-selling PC video games of all time. Here's a video of the action being performed in-game.
Moving on to a better-suited word: when I was in elementary school (5 - 6 years ago), the word of choice to describe that exact action was taze. The second definition on Urban Dictionary confirms this, with 49 upvotes.
taze
when someone pokes your sides from behind
guy : tazes girl
girl :hahahah stop it! :)
by aurora_is_ninja December 24, 2010
This isn't the best word that could be used to describe this, as it has a homophone tase, which means "to shoot with a Taser gun" (Merriam-Webster) - obviously a much more shocking action than your intent.
I haven't heard this word used since about 2010, but I would still recognise its meaning if someone said it to me today. I'm Canadian, so I can't speak for its use elsewhere.
answered Jan 27 '16 at 5:50
OperaticSkeletonOperaticSkeleton
487316
3
I suspect that the "taze" of poking someone is derived from the "tase" meaning to shoot with a taser gun, and is based on the similar shock effect.
– AndyT
Jan 27 '16 at 11:51
add a comment |
I agree with Joe Blow's comment - "goose" as a verb invariably means "to grab in the buttocks." As a somewhat reputable example, it's classed under "Romantic Interactions" in the life simulation video game The Sims 2, one of the best-selling PC video games of all time. Here's a video of the action being performed in-game.
Moving on to a better-suited word: when I was in elementary school (5 - 6 years ago), the word of choice to describe that exact action was taze. The second definition on Urban Dictionary confirms this, with 49 upvotes.
taze
when someone pokes your sides from behind
guy : tazes girl
girl :hahahah stop it! :)
by aurora_is_ninja December 24, 2010
This isn't the best word that could be used to describe this, as it has a homophone tase, which means "to shoot with a Taser gun" (Merriam-Webster) - obviously a much more shocking action than your intent.
I haven't heard this word used since about 2010, but I would still recognise its meaning if someone said it to me today. I'm Canadian, so I can't speak for its use elsewhere.
answered Jan 27 '16 at 5:50
OperaticSkeletonOperaticSkeleton
487316
3
I suspect that the "taze" of poking someone is derived from the "tase" meaning to shoot with a taser gun, and is based on the similar shock effect.
– AndyT
Jan 27 '16 at 11:51
add a comment |
I agree with Joe Blow's comment - "goose" as a verb invariably means "to grab in the buttocks." As a somewhat reputable example, it's classed under "Romantic Interactions" in the life simulation video game The Sims 2, one of the best-selling PC video games of all time. Here's a video of the action being performed in-game.
Moving on to a better-suited word: when I was in elementary school (5 - 6 years ago), the word of choice to describe that exact action was taze. The second definition on Urban Dictionary confirms this, with 49 upvotes.
taze
when someone pokes your sides from behind
guy : tazes girl
girl :hahahah stop it! :)
by aurora_is_ninja December 24, 2010
This isn't the best word that could be used to describe this, as it has a homophone tase, which means "to shoot with a Taser gun" (Merriam-Webster) - obviously a much more shocking action than your intent.
I haven't heard this word used since about 2010, but I would still recognise its meaning if someone said it to me today. I'm Canadian, so I can't speak for its use elsewhere.
answered Jan 27 '16 at 5:50
OperaticSkeletonOperaticSkeleton
487316
I agree with Joe Blow's comment - "goose" as a verb invariably means "to grab in the buttocks." As a somewhat reputable example, it's classed under "Romantic Interactions" in the life simulation video game The Sims 2, one of the best-selling PC video games of all time. Here's a video of the action being performed in-game.
Moving on to a better-suited word: when I was in elementary school (5 - 6 years ago), the word of choice to describe that exact action was taze. The second definition on Urban Dictionary confirms this, with 49 upvotes.
taze
when someone pokes your sides from behind
guy : tazes girl
girl :hahahah stop it! :)
by aurora_is_ninja December 24, 2010
This isn't the best word that could be used to describe this, as it has a homophone tase, which means "to shoot with a Taser gun" (Merriam-Webster) - obviously a much more shocking action than your intent.
I haven't heard this word used since about 2010, but I would still recognise its meaning if someone said it to me today. I'm Canadian, so I can't speak for its use elsewhere.
answered Jan 27 '16 at 5:50
OperaticSkeletonOperaticSkeleton
487316
answered Jan 27 '16 at 5:50
OperaticSkeletonOperaticSkeleton
487316
answered Jan 27 '16 at 5:50
OperaticSkeletonOperaticSkeleton
487316
answered Jan 27 '16 at 5:50
OperaticSkeletonOperaticSkeleton
487316
487316
3
I suspect that the "taze" of poking someone is derived from the "tase" meaning to shoot with a taser gun, and is based on the similar shock effect.
– AndyT
Jan 27 '16 at 11:51
add a comment |
3
I suspect that the "taze" of poking someone is derived from the "tase" meaning to shoot with a taser gun, and is based on the similar shock effect.
– AndyT
Jan 27 '16 at 11:51
3
3
I suspect that the "taze" of poking someone is derived from the "tase" meaning to shoot with a taser gun, and is based on the similar shock effect.
– AndyT
Jan 27 '16 at 11:51
I suspect that the "taze" of poking someone is derived from the "tase" meaning to shoot with a taser gun, and is based on the similar shock effect.
– AndyT
Jan 27 '16 at 11:51
add a comment |
Ok, well, poking someone above the waist and below the ribcage is called "tasering" like EVERYWHERE. People who poke you there it makes you feel tickly.
answered Mar 4 '17 at 7:50
MaryMary
1
2
Thanks, @Mary, but we probably need a citation to justify the assertion that this usage is common "like EVERYWHERE."
– Michael - sqlbot
Mar 4 '17 at 14:25
add a comment |
Ok, well, poking someone above the waist and below the ribcage is called "tasering" like EVERYWHERE. People who poke you there it makes you feel tickly.
answered Mar 4 '17 at 7:50
MaryMary
1
2
Thanks, @Mary, but we probably need a citation to justify the assertion that this usage is common "like EVERYWHERE."
– Michael - sqlbot
Mar 4 '17 at 14:25
add a comment |
Ok, well, poking someone above the waist and below the ribcage is called "tasering" like EVERYWHERE. People who poke you there it makes you feel tickly.
answered Mar 4 '17 at 7:50
MaryMary
1
Ok, well, poking someone above the waist and below the ribcage is called "tasering" like EVERYWHERE. People who poke you there it makes you feel tickly.
answered Mar 4 '17 at 7:50
MaryMary
1
answered Mar 4 '17 at 7:50
MaryMary
1
answered Mar 4 '17 at 7:50
MaryMary
1
answered Mar 4 '17 at 7:50
MaryMary
1
1
2
Thanks, @Mary, but we probably need a citation to justify the assertion that this usage is common "like EVERYWHERE."
– Michael - sqlbot
Mar 4 '17 at 14:25
add a comment |
2
Thanks, @Mary, but we probably need a citation to justify the assertion that this usage is common "like EVERYWHERE."
– Michael - sqlbot
Mar 4 '17 at 14:25
2
2
Thanks, @Mary, but we probably need a citation to justify the assertion that this usage is common "like EVERYWHERE."
– Michael - sqlbot
Mar 4 '17 at 14:25
Thanks, @Mary, but we probably need a citation to justify the assertion that this usage is common "like EVERYWHERE."
– Michael - sqlbot
Mar 4 '17 at 14:25
add a comment |
My experience is that Goose is specific to the round back area. Personally I use the word exactly as defined "to prod or urge to action or an emotional reaction", esp in the AD biz when referring to a desired action by the client/consumer. Not sure why that particular definition is surprising to you...
answered Jan 19 '18 at 19:06
Big D RockBig D Rock
1
add a comment |
My experience is that Goose is specific to the round back area. Personally I use the word exactly as defined "to prod or urge to action or an emotional reaction", esp in the AD biz when referring to a desired action by the client/consumer. Not sure why that particular definition is surprising to you...
answered Jan 19 '18 at 19:06
Big D RockBig D Rock
1
add a comment |
My experience is that Goose is specific to the round back area. Personally I use the word exactly as defined "to prod or urge to action or an emotional reaction", esp in the AD biz when referring to a desired action by the client/consumer. Not sure why that particular definition is surprising to you...
answered Jan 19 '18 at 19:06
Big D RockBig D Rock
1
My experience is that Goose is specific to the round back area. Personally I use the word exactly as defined "to prod or urge to action or an emotional reaction", esp in the AD biz when referring to a desired action by the client/consumer. Not sure why that particular definition is surprising to you...
answered Jan 19 '18 at 19:06
Big D RockBig D Rock
1
answered Jan 19 '18 at 19:06
Big D RockBig D Rock
1
answered Jan 19 '18 at 19:06
Big D RockBig D Rock
1
answered Jan 19 '18 at 19:06
Big D RockBig D Rock
1
1
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f274774%2fword-meaning-to-startle-someone-by-surreptitiously-poking-them-in-the-sides-fr%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
There is absolutely no sense, whatever, in which your usage was correct. "goose" only means "on the crack" "in the crack" or perhaps at best "sexually on , in, or around 'the ass'". same in all regions. "I'm confused about how I came to believe that this usage of the word had a different meaning" I find it utterly commonplace that people (including myself) have unique unusual misunderstandings of words; there is nothing to explain.
– Fattie
Sep 18 '15 at 18:56
Regarding the "double tickle from behind" there's no single common term for that. When you say "poke" it's usually understood to mean a light-hearted poke, somewhere innocent (as opposed to a goose or perhaps pinch) - so that's something of an answer. {Note though that "poke" can be a light-hearted term for "have intercourse" in, say, Australia.)
– Fattie
Sep 18 '15 at 18:58
1
I know how you came to believe it was innocuous. The children's game Duck, Duck, Goose!.
– jxh
Sep 18 '15 at 23:53