nmap + how to detected all machines IP's with range for example 10.64.*.*












0














How to verify the range of all machines with nmap within IP class



 10.64.*.*


For example we tried



nmap -sn 10.64.*.0/24 | grep redhat


in order to capture all machines with redhat name that have IPs from 10.64.1.0 to 10.64.255.255 but this doesn't work.










share|improve this question
























  • Is 10.64.*.* a connected network (i.e. the machine from which you're executing nmap has an IP in the same network)? Is the network subnetmask 255.255.0.0 (/16)?
    – Mr Shunz
    Dec 12 '18 at 15:34
















0














How to verify the range of all machines with nmap within IP class



 10.64.*.*


For example we tried



nmap -sn 10.64.*.0/24 | grep redhat


in order to capture all machines with redhat name that have IPs from 10.64.1.0 to 10.64.255.255 but this doesn't work.










share|improve this question
























  • Is 10.64.*.* a connected network (i.e. the machine from which you're executing nmap has an IP in the same network)? Is the network subnetmask 255.255.0.0 (/16)?
    – Mr Shunz
    Dec 12 '18 at 15:34














0












0








0







How to verify the range of all machines with nmap within IP class



 10.64.*.*


For example we tried



nmap -sn 10.64.*.0/24 | grep redhat


in order to capture all machines with redhat name that have IPs from 10.64.1.0 to 10.64.255.255 but this doesn't work.










share|improve this question















How to verify the range of all machines with nmap within IP class



 10.64.*.*


For example we tried



nmap -sn 10.64.*.0/24 | grep redhat


in order to capture all machines with redhat name that have IPs from 10.64.1.0 to 10.64.255.255 but this doesn't work.







linux networking nmap






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Dec 12 '18 at 15:48









Mr Shunz

1,6681616




1,6681616










asked Dec 12 '18 at 15:23









King David

186119




186119












  • Is 10.64.*.* a connected network (i.e. the machine from which you're executing nmap has an IP in the same network)? Is the network subnetmask 255.255.0.0 (/16)?
    – Mr Shunz
    Dec 12 '18 at 15:34


















  • Is 10.64.*.* a connected network (i.e. the machine from which you're executing nmap has an IP in the same network)? Is the network subnetmask 255.255.0.0 (/16)?
    – Mr Shunz
    Dec 12 '18 at 15:34
















Is 10.64.*.* a connected network (i.e. the machine from which you're executing nmap has an IP in the same network)? Is the network subnetmask 255.255.0.0 (/16)?
– Mr Shunz
Dec 12 '18 at 15:34




Is 10.64.*.* a connected network (i.e. the machine from which you're executing nmap has an IP in the same network)? Is the network subnetmask 255.255.0.0 (/16)?
– Mr Shunz
Dec 12 '18 at 15:34










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1














Using nmap to scan 10.64.*.*will take a lot of time as there are 4096 addresses to scan.
Also, for OS detection use -O option with nmap.
-sn only shows available host.
You can use -v to see the verbose output.
I hope this helps!!






share|improve this answer





















  • is it possible to find first the first three octat with nmap ? ( for example in some cluster we have 10.64.30.xxx and 19.64.31.xxx ( is it possible to find it by nmap or other tool ?
    – King David
    Dec 12 '18 at 16:02












  • If your ip is in the cluster you can check it by ifconfig utility.
    – CHETAN ARORA
    Dec 12 '18 at 16:07










  • but other machines could be with other octata
    – King David
    Dec 12 '18 at 16:12










  • Ifconfig utility gives subnet mask. E.g. if my mask is 255.255.254.0 , as it has 23 1’s from beginning. So my ip range would be 10.64.0.0/23 . Try using the verbose output it will solve any doubts itself.
    – CHETAN ARORA
    Dec 12 '18 at 16:26










  • If you're forgoing the port scan, OS detection is likely to be significantly less reliable. Also, you can speed things up further by adding -PR to use ARP to find hosts that are online and -T4 to generally speed things up.
    – Austin Hemmelgarn
    Dec 12 '18 at 19:42



















1














Try for the target the syntax of 10.64.0.0/16 or 10.64.0-255.1-254.






share|improve this answer





















  • when I didi it then nmap stuck , ( we cant to cntrl C also )
    – King David
    Dec 12 '18 at 15:34












  • I did it without the | grep , but I see nmap take a lot of time , and I must to get results ate least in one min
    – King David
    Dec 12 '18 at 15:47










  • Try to add the -T5 parameter to use the full available bandwidth, but may slow down the rest of the network.
    – harrymc
    Dec 12 '18 at 16:12











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1382997%2fnmap-how-to-detected-all-machines-ips-with-range-for-example-10-64%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1














Using nmap to scan 10.64.*.*will take a lot of time as there are 4096 addresses to scan.
Also, for OS detection use -O option with nmap.
-sn only shows available host.
You can use -v to see the verbose output.
I hope this helps!!






share|improve this answer





















  • is it possible to find first the first three octat with nmap ? ( for example in some cluster we have 10.64.30.xxx and 19.64.31.xxx ( is it possible to find it by nmap or other tool ?
    – King David
    Dec 12 '18 at 16:02












  • If your ip is in the cluster you can check it by ifconfig utility.
    – CHETAN ARORA
    Dec 12 '18 at 16:07










  • but other machines could be with other octata
    – King David
    Dec 12 '18 at 16:12










  • Ifconfig utility gives subnet mask. E.g. if my mask is 255.255.254.0 , as it has 23 1’s from beginning. So my ip range would be 10.64.0.0/23 . Try using the verbose output it will solve any doubts itself.
    – CHETAN ARORA
    Dec 12 '18 at 16:26










  • If you're forgoing the port scan, OS detection is likely to be significantly less reliable. Also, you can speed things up further by adding -PR to use ARP to find hosts that are online and -T4 to generally speed things up.
    – Austin Hemmelgarn
    Dec 12 '18 at 19:42
















1














Using nmap to scan 10.64.*.*will take a lot of time as there are 4096 addresses to scan.
Also, for OS detection use -O option with nmap.
-sn only shows available host.
You can use -v to see the verbose output.
I hope this helps!!






share|improve this answer





















  • is it possible to find first the first three octat with nmap ? ( for example in some cluster we have 10.64.30.xxx and 19.64.31.xxx ( is it possible to find it by nmap or other tool ?
    – King David
    Dec 12 '18 at 16:02












  • If your ip is in the cluster you can check it by ifconfig utility.
    – CHETAN ARORA
    Dec 12 '18 at 16:07










  • but other machines could be with other octata
    – King David
    Dec 12 '18 at 16:12










  • Ifconfig utility gives subnet mask. E.g. if my mask is 255.255.254.0 , as it has 23 1’s from beginning. So my ip range would be 10.64.0.0/23 . Try using the verbose output it will solve any doubts itself.
    – CHETAN ARORA
    Dec 12 '18 at 16:26










  • If you're forgoing the port scan, OS detection is likely to be significantly less reliable. Also, you can speed things up further by adding -PR to use ARP to find hosts that are online and -T4 to generally speed things up.
    – Austin Hemmelgarn
    Dec 12 '18 at 19:42














1












1








1






Using nmap to scan 10.64.*.*will take a lot of time as there are 4096 addresses to scan.
Also, for OS detection use -O option with nmap.
-sn only shows available host.
You can use -v to see the verbose output.
I hope this helps!!






share|improve this answer












Using nmap to scan 10.64.*.*will take a lot of time as there are 4096 addresses to scan.
Also, for OS detection use -O option with nmap.
-sn only shows available host.
You can use -v to see the verbose output.
I hope this helps!!







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Dec 12 '18 at 15:58









CHETAN ARORA

261




261












  • is it possible to find first the first three octat with nmap ? ( for example in some cluster we have 10.64.30.xxx and 19.64.31.xxx ( is it possible to find it by nmap or other tool ?
    – King David
    Dec 12 '18 at 16:02












  • If your ip is in the cluster you can check it by ifconfig utility.
    – CHETAN ARORA
    Dec 12 '18 at 16:07










  • but other machines could be with other octata
    – King David
    Dec 12 '18 at 16:12










  • Ifconfig utility gives subnet mask. E.g. if my mask is 255.255.254.0 , as it has 23 1’s from beginning. So my ip range would be 10.64.0.0/23 . Try using the verbose output it will solve any doubts itself.
    – CHETAN ARORA
    Dec 12 '18 at 16:26










  • If you're forgoing the port scan, OS detection is likely to be significantly less reliable. Also, you can speed things up further by adding -PR to use ARP to find hosts that are online and -T4 to generally speed things up.
    – Austin Hemmelgarn
    Dec 12 '18 at 19:42


















  • is it possible to find first the first three octat with nmap ? ( for example in some cluster we have 10.64.30.xxx and 19.64.31.xxx ( is it possible to find it by nmap or other tool ?
    – King David
    Dec 12 '18 at 16:02












  • If your ip is in the cluster you can check it by ifconfig utility.
    – CHETAN ARORA
    Dec 12 '18 at 16:07










  • but other machines could be with other octata
    – King David
    Dec 12 '18 at 16:12










  • Ifconfig utility gives subnet mask. E.g. if my mask is 255.255.254.0 , as it has 23 1’s from beginning. So my ip range would be 10.64.0.0/23 . Try using the verbose output it will solve any doubts itself.
    – CHETAN ARORA
    Dec 12 '18 at 16:26










  • If you're forgoing the port scan, OS detection is likely to be significantly less reliable. Also, you can speed things up further by adding -PR to use ARP to find hosts that are online and -T4 to generally speed things up.
    – Austin Hemmelgarn
    Dec 12 '18 at 19:42
















is it possible to find first the first three octat with nmap ? ( for example in some cluster we have 10.64.30.xxx and 19.64.31.xxx ( is it possible to find it by nmap or other tool ?
– King David
Dec 12 '18 at 16:02






is it possible to find first the first three octat with nmap ? ( for example in some cluster we have 10.64.30.xxx and 19.64.31.xxx ( is it possible to find it by nmap or other tool ?
– King David
Dec 12 '18 at 16:02














If your ip is in the cluster you can check it by ifconfig utility.
– CHETAN ARORA
Dec 12 '18 at 16:07




If your ip is in the cluster you can check it by ifconfig utility.
– CHETAN ARORA
Dec 12 '18 at 16:07












but other machines could be with other octata
– King David
Dec 12 '18 at 16:12




but other machines could be with other octata
– King David
Dec 12 '18 at 16:12












Ifconfig utility gives subnet mask. E.g. if my mask is 255.255.254.0 , as it has 23 1’s from beginning. So my ip range would be 10.64.0.0/23 . Try using the verbose output it will solve any doubts itself.
– CHETAN ARORA
Dec 12 '18 at 16:26




Ifconfig utility gives subnet mask. E.g. if my mask is 255.255.254.0 , as it has 23 1’s from beginning. So my ip range would be 10.64.0.0/23 . Try using the verbose output it will solve any doubts itself.
– CHETAN ARORA
Dec 12 '18 at 16:26












If you're forgoing the port scan, OS detection is likely to be significantly less reliable. Also, you can speed things up further by adding -PR to use ARP to find hosts that are online and -T4 to generally speed things up.
– Austin Hemmelgarn
Dec 12 '18 at 19:42




If you're forgoing the port scan, OS detection is likely to be significantly less reliable. Also, you can speed things up further by adding -PR to use ARP to find hosts that are online and -T4 to generally speed things up.
– Austin Hemmelgarn
Dec 12 '18 at 19:42













1














Try for the target the syntax of 10.64.0.0/16 or 10.64.0-255.1-254.






share|improve this answer





















  • when I didi it then nmap stuck , ( we cant to cntrl C also )
    – King David
    Dec 12 '18 at 15:34












  • I did it without the | grep , but I see nmap take a lot of time , and I must to get results ate least in one min
    – King David
    Dec 12 '18 at 15:47










  • Try to add the -T5 parameter to use the full available bandwidth, but may slow down the rest of the network.
    – harrymc
    Dec 12 '18 at 16:12
















1














Try for the target the syntax of 10.64.0.0/16 or 10.64.0-255.1-254.






share|improve this answer





















  • when I didi it then nmap stuck , ( we cant to cntrl C also )
    – King David
    Dec 12 '18 at 15:34












  • I did it without the | grep , but I see nmap take a lot of time , and I must to get results ate least in one min
    – King David
    Dec 12 '18 at 15:47










  • Try to add the -T5 parameter to use the full available bandwidth, but may slow down the rest of the network.
    – harrymc
    Dec 12 '18 at 16:12














1












1








1






Try for the target the syntax of 10.64.0.0/16 or 10.64.0-255.1-254.






share|improve this answer












Try for the target the syntax of 10.64.0.0/16 or 10.64.0-255.1-254.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Dec 12 '18 at 15:30









harrymc

253k12262564




253k12262564












  • when I didi it then nmap stuck , ( we cant to cntrl C also )
    – King David
    Dec 12 '18 at 15:34












  • I did it without the | grep , but I see nmap take a lot of time , and I must to get results ate least in one min
    – King David
    Dec 12 '18 at 15:47










  • Try to add the -T5 parameter to use the full available bandwidth, but may slow down the rest of the network.
    – harrymc
    Dec 12 '18 at 16:12


















  • when I didi it then nmap stuck , ( we cant to cntrl C also )
    – King David
    Dec 12 '18 at 15:34












  • I did it without the | grep , but I see nmap take a lot of time , and I must to get results ate least in one min
    – King David
    Dec 12 '18 at 15:47










  • Try to add the -T5 parameter to use the full available bandwidth, but may slow down the rest of the network.
    – harrymc
    Dec 12 '18 at 16:12
















when I didi it then nmap stuck , ( we cant to cntrl C also )
– King David
Dec 12 '18 at 15:34






when I didi it then nmap stuck , ( we cant to cntrl C also )
– King David
Dec 12 '18 at 15:34














I did it without the | grep , but I see nmap take a lot of time , and I must to get results ate least in one min
– King David
Dec 12 '18 at 15:47




I did it without the | grep , but I see nmap take a lot of time , and I must to get results ate least in one min
– King David
Dec 12 '18 at 15:47












Try to add the -T5 parameter to use the full available bandwidth, but may slow down the rest of the network.
– harrymc
Dec 12 '18 at 16:12




Try to add the -T5 parameter to use the full available bandwidth, but may slow down the rest of the network.
– harrymc
Dec 12 '18 at 16:12


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1382997%2fnmap-how-to-detected-all-machines-ips-with-range-for-example-10-64%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

"Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ON'. (on update cascade, on delete cascade,)

Alcedinidae

RAC Tourist Trophy