Identify this tree?
I saw this tree in Central Park, NY. Can anyone identify it?

identification trees
add a comment |
I saw this tree in Central Park, NY. Can anyone identify it?

identification trees
I see everyone thinks they're flowerbuds - but are they? They could be leaf buds which sit there till the time is right, your image doesn't magnify too well to see clearly... if they're not flowers, are the buds furry or fuzzy on the outside? And how big is the tree? Impossible to tell from the image, can you add another photo that displays the whole tree so we can see growth habit please?
– Bamboo
Dec 31 '18 at 23:26
add a comment |
I saw this tree in Central Park, NY. Can anyone identify it?

identification trees
I saw this tree in Central Park, NY. Can anyone identify it?

identification trees
identification trees
asked Dec 31 '18 at 22:01
rbhat
436210
436210
I see everyone thinks they're flowerbuds - but are they? They could be leaf buds which sit there till the time is right, your image doesn't magnify too well to see clearly... if they're not flowers, are the buds furry or fuzzy on the outside? And how big is the tree? Impossible to tell from the image, can you add another photo that displays the whole tree so we can see growth habit please?
– Bamboo
Dec 31 '18 at 23:26
add a comment |
I see everyone thinks they're flowerbuds - but are they? They could be leaf buds which sit there till the time is right, your image doesn't magnify too well to see clearly... if they're not flowers, are the buds furry or fuzzy on the outside? And how big is the tree? Impossible to tell from the image, can you add another photo that displays the whole tree so we can see growth habit please?
– Bamboo
Dec 31 '18 at 23:26
I see everyone thinks they're flowerbuds - but are they? They could be leaf buds which sit there till the time is right, your image doesn't magnify too well to see clearly... if they're not flowers, are the buds furry or fuzzy on the outside? And how big is the tree? Impossible to tell from the image, can you add another photo that displays the whole tree so we can see growth habit please?
– Bamboo
Dec 31 '18 at 23:26
I see everyone thinks they're flowerbuds - but are they? They could be leaf buds which sit there till the time is right, your image doesn't magnify too well to see clearly... if they're not flowers, are the buds furry or fuzzy on the outside? And how big is the tree? Impossible to tell from the image, can you add another photo that displays the whole tree so we can see growth habit please?
– Bamboo
Dec 31 '18 at 23:26
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
White/pink flowers before leaves, combined with the light spotty bark on the new shoots indicates a Magnolia. Possibly a star or saucer magnolia, hard to say at this point.
Edit: also in favour of Magnolia is the somewhat crazy branch/twig structure and the way it repairs itself after damage. Magnolia is dramatic due to its tendency to flower very early in the year (this one might do well to slow up and wait until about February) but otherwise is an untidy looking small tree, in detail, but is quite acceptable in overall shape/form from a distance.
add a comment |
I think this might work? Aesculus hippocastanum or Horse Chestnut. Were you able to see any leaves lying on the ground?




It's not likely to be a horse chestnut growing in New York, unless that picture was taken 9 months ago. The buds sometimes don't burst until April in the UK, and never before March.
– alephzero
Dec 31 '18 at 23:14
In London UK, horse chestnuts usually in flower late April or May, well after the leaves have appeared...unlikely to be Aesculus if these are actually flower buds
– Bamboo
Jan 1 at 1:05
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "269"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgardening.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f42990%2fidentify-this-tree%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
White/pink flowers before leaves, combined with the light spotty bark on the new shoots indicates a Magnolia. Possibly a star or saucer magnolia, hard to say at this point.
Edit: also in favour of Magnolia is the somewhat crazy branch/twig structure and the way it repairs itself after damage. Magnolia is dramatic due to its tendency to flower very early in the year (this one might do well to slow up and wait until about February) but otherwise is an untidy looking small tree, in detail, but is quite acceptable in overall shape/form from a distance.
add a comment |
White/pink flowers before leaves, combined with the light spotty bark on the new shoots indicates a Magnolia. Possibly a star or saucer magnolia, hard to say at this point.
Edit: also in favour of Magnolia is the somewhat crazy branch/twig structure and the way it repairs itself after damage. Magnolia is dramatic due to its tendency to flower very early in the year (this one might do well to slow up and wait until about February) but otherwise is an untidy looking small tree, in detail, but is quite acceptable in overall shape/form from a distance.
add a comment |
White/pink flowers before leaves, combined with the light spotty bark on the new shoots indicates a Magnolia. Possibly a star or saucer magnolia, hard to say at this point.
Edit: also in favour of Magnolia is the somewhat crazy branch/twig structure and the way it repairs itself after damage. Magnolia is dramatic due to its tendency to flower very early in the year (this one might do well to slow up and wait until about February) but otherwise is an untidy looking small tree, in detail, but is quite acceptable in overall shape/form from a distance.
White/pink flowers before leaves, combined with the light spotty bark on the new shoots indicates a Magnolia. Possibly a star or saucer magnolia, hard to say at this point.
Edit: also in favour of Magnolia is the somewhat crazy branch/twig structure and the way it repairs itself after damage. Magnolia is dramatic due to its tendency to flower very early in the year (this one might do well to slow up and wait until about February) but otherwise is an untidy looking small tree, in detail, but is quite acceptable in overall shape/form from a distance.
edited 2 days ago
answered Dec 31 '18 at 23:14
Colin Beckingham
6,087326
6,087326
add a comment |
add a comment |
I think this might work? Aesculus hippocastanum or Horse Chestnut. Were you able to see any leaves lying on the ground?




It's not likely to be a horse chestnut growing in New York, unless that picture was taken 9 months ago. The buds sometimes don't burst until April in the UK, and never before March.
– alephzero
Dec 31 '18 at 23:14
In London UK, horse chestnuts usually in flower late April or May, well after the leaves have appeared...unlikely to be Aesculus if these are actually flower buds
– Bamboo
Jan 1 at 1:05
add a comment |
I think this might work? Aesculus hippocastanum or Horse Chestnut. Were you able to see any leaves lying on the ground?




It's not likely to be a horse chestnut growing in New York, unless that picture was taken 9 months ago. The buds sometimes don't burst until April in the UK, and never before March.
– alephzero
Dec 31 '18 at 23:14
In London UK, horse chestnuts usually in flower late April or May, well after the leaves have appeared...unlikely to be Aesculus if these are actually flower buds
– Bamboo
Jan 1 at 1:05
add a comment |
I think this might work? Aesculus hippocastanum or Horse Chestnut. Were you able to see any leaves lying on the ground?




I think this might work? Aesculus hippocastanum or Horse Chestnut. Were you able to see any leaves lying on the ground?




edited Dec 31 '18 at 22:32
answered Dec 31 '18 at 22:26
stormy
37.6k21968
37.6k21968
It's not likely to be a horse chestnut growing in New York, unless that picture was taken 9 months ago. The buds sometimes don't burst until April in the UK, and never before March.
– alephzero
Dec 31 '18 at 23:14
In London UK, horse chestnuts usually in flower late April or May, well after the leaves have appeared...unlikely to be Aesculus if these are actually flower buds
– Bamboo
Jan 1 at 1:05
add a comment |
It's not likely to be a horse chestnut growing in New York, unless that picture was taken 9 months ago. The buds sometimes don't burst until April in the UK, and never before March.
– alephzero
Dec 31 '18 at 23:14
In London UK, horse chestnuts usually in flower late April or May, well after the leaves have appeared...unlikely to be Aesculus if these are actually flower buds
– Bamboo
Jan 1 at 1:05
It's not likely to be a horse chestnut growing in New York, unless that picture was taken 9 months ago. The buds sometimes don't burst until April in the UK, and never before March.
– alephzero
Dec 31 '18 at 23:14
It's not likely to be a horse chestnut growing in New York, unless that picture was taken 9 months ago. The buds sometimes don't burst until April in the UK, and never before March.
– alephzero
Dec 31 '18 at 23:14
In London UK, horse chestnuts usually in flower late April or May, well after the leaves have appeared...unlikely to be Aesculus if these are actually flower buds
– Bamboo
Jan 1 at 1:05
In London UK, horse chestnuts usually in flower late April or May, well after the leaves have appeared...unlikely to be Aesculus if these are actually flower buds
– Bamboo
Jan 1 at 1:05
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Gardening & Landscaping Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgardening.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f42990%2fidentify-this-tree%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
I see everyone thinks they're flowerbuds - but are they? They could be leaf buds which sit there till the time is right, your image doesn't magnify too well to see clearly... if they're not flowers, are the buds furry or fuzzy on the outside? And how big is the tree? Impossible to tell from the image, can you add another photo that displays the whole tree so we can see growth habit please?
– Bamboo
Dec 31 '18 at 23:26